IR 05000460/1985001

Meeting Repts 50-460/85-01 & 50-508/85-01 on 850522.Item Discussed:Proposed Readiness Review Program,Including Preservation Program for Unit 3

ML20127J326
Person / Time
Site:	Satsop, Washington Public Power Supply System
Issue date:	06/06/1985
From:	Dodds R, Kirsch D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20127J317	List: IR 05000460/1985001 ML20127J313
References
50-460-85-01-MM, 50-460-85-1-MM, 50-508-85-01, 50-508-85-1, NUDOCS 8506260554
Download: ML20127J326 (21)

Text

.-- .__... . ..- - - .

_

- - '

l l

!

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s

REGION V

Report Nos: 50-460/85-01 and 50-508/85-01

- Docket Nos: 50-460/and 50-508 Construction Permit No: CPPR-134 and CPPR-154 Licensee: Washington Public Power Supply System 3000 George. Washington Way

- Richaland, Washington' 99352 Facility Names: Washington Nuclear Projects 1 and 3 Meeting at: Region V, Walnut Creek, California Date: Ma,y 22, 1985 Prepared by: l^

R. T. Dodds,4hief, Reactor Projcet, Section 1 @at( Signed Approved by: .k

. F. Kirlich,- Acting Director, Division Reactor

~d4I[

Irat( Signed l

Safety & Projects  ;

Summary:

Meeting on May 22, 1985, to discuss the Supply System proposed readiness review program for Phase I for the subject facilities, including the l- preservation program for Unit !

l

,

I i l l 8506260554 850607 4 PDR ADOCK 05000460 0 PDR i 1

\ l

'

,

' J

l

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

-

,

. .

,

Details

'

l. Personnel Attending Meeting RV-NRC D. F. Kirsch, Acting Director, DRSP R. T. Dodds, Chief, Reactor Project Section 1 NRR-NRC F. J. Miraglia, Deputy Director of Licensing T. S. Michaels, Project Manager IE-NRC G. T. Ankrum, Chief, Quality Assurance Branch W. M. Hill, Sr. Engineer, Quality Assurance Branch WPPSS R. B. Glasscock, Director, Licensing and Assurance L. J. Garvin, Manager, Construction Quality Assurance D. I. Hulbert, Assistant Program Director, Engineering 2. General The Supply System's January 31, 1985, letter to Region V outlined a proposal for a series of Readiness Reviews at the WNP-1 and WNP-3 projects. The Supply System has met with members of the staff of Region V, the Office of Inspection and Enforcement and most recently with members of both the NRR and I&E offices. The topics of discussion included the future of the delayed projects, preservation plans and how the Supply System plans to implement the Readiness Review concept during the construction delays and after construction resume In a March 20, 1985, letter the Supply System provided Region V and members of the staffs of NRR and I&E with a commitment to complete the delayed projects and to complete the Readiness Reviews, along with an outline of the schedule for Phase Ilof the Readiness Revie Phase I, for WNP-3, will begin approximately July 1, 1985, and be '

complete prior to resumption of construction. This phase of the reviews would focus on the des'an and construction completed to date. It would assess the design and construction processes and sample the products of both processes so that conclusions can be drawn about the adequacy of the completed work. Phase I of the Readiness Review process for WNP-1 will begin after the Supply System has gained experience from the performance of reviews at WNP- Phase II of the Readiness Reviews will begin following resumption of construction and will include all aspects of new or changed design and construction, and readiness for operations. The goal of. Phase II will be to give additional assurance that the projects are ready to operate by

_____________ _ _ _ -

. .

-2-conducting a series of reviews that address the adequacy of the design and the design construction processes used to compete the project Closely related to the Readiness Review, which affirms adequacy of design and construction, is the program used to control preservation of equipment and structures at the delayed projects. In mid-April, 1985, the Supply System submitted a working copy of the Preservation Program in effect at WNP-3 to Region V for review prior to meeting with Region V and other concerned NRC offices. Following the meeting the Supply System will formally submit the Preservation Program for NRC review and approva Since March, 1985, regional power planning has progressed with indications that both WNP-3 and WNP-1 are still being considered a potential future power source, and both projects remain a cost effective source of power. According to the licensee, all indications are that the projects will be complete As discussed above, the Supply System has been implementing a Preservation Program and is totally committed to perform a series of Readiness Reviews at the delayed projects. The results of these programs will enable the Supply System to finish construction and bring both projects to successful operation status. The Supply System is requesting that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission agree to review the program descriptions of the Readiness Reviews at WNP-3 and WNP-1 for approval, agree to participate in the Readiness Review at WNP-3 and WNP-1, and review the Preservation Program Description for approva Attached is a copy of the slides used by the licensee during the presentation of the proposed program. The licensee agreed that the first order of business will be to formally submit the Preservation Program and Design Review Program to the NRC for revie .

L

.

. .

.

READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM WHAT IS IT: ,

e A SERIES OF REVIEWS TO ASSESS THE ADEQUACY OF AN ACTIVIT e FOR THE SUPPLY SYSTEM THE SERIES OF REVIEWS ENCOMPASS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ALL ASPECTS OF DESIGN. CONSTRUCTION AND PREPARATION FOR OPERATION e PROGRAM HAS SUPPLY SYSTEM MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMEN ALONG WITH NRC PARTICIPATIO .

. .

.

i l

WHAT DOES THE PROGRAM ACCOMPLISH 7

.

.

e GIVES MANAGEMENT ADDITIONAL ASSURANCE THAT QUALITY-RELATED PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN DETECTE e PRO 6 RAM 6IVES CONFIDENCE AS THE WORK PROGRESSE e PRECLUDES SURPRISES AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION.

,

<

!

- , . . - , - -_ - . . _ . . . . _ _ . . _ _ . _ . _ . , _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ , , . , _ . _ _ _ , , _ , . _ _ . . . _ , , . _ , _ _ , . . _ _ , , _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ , . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _

_ , _ _ , . _ .

.

. .

.

l

!

!

i

. READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM GOALS

.

i

. e WHEN A REVIEW IS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED. ALL ISSUES RELATED TO THAT SUBJECT WILL HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AND ANSWERE t i

e FSAR AND SER QUESTIONS FINISHED.

!

i i

i

_ - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ - - -

6 9

CURRENT ACTIVITIES ,

,

e NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY - SOME SMART WORK TO HELP PRESERVATION e SOME DESIGN ON-GOING e DESIGN STATUSING BEING CONDUCTED e PRESERVATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED e NO PREPARATION FOR OPERATION

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

. .

.

SUPPLY SYSTEM READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM

,

SINCE OUR PROJECTS ARE NOT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION,

.

OUR REVIEW PRO 6 RAM MUST BE DIVIDED INTO TWO PHASE e INITIAL PHASE -

TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BEFORE RESUMPTION OF CONSTRUCTIO e SECOND PHASE -

BEGINS FOLLOWING RESUMPTION OF CONSTRUCTION AND IS COMPLETE BEFORE OPERATING LICENS ..

, _ . _ - - - _ - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

.

. .

- ,

r INITIAL PHASE .

!

I e REVIEW OF WORK COMPLETED TO DAT e FOCUS ON DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESSE e SAMPLE PRODUCTS OF THESE PROCESSES AND DRAW CONCLUSIONS FROM THE RESULTS OF THE REVIEW .

,

. .

. ,

i DESIGN REVIEWS e SELECT REVIEW TOPIC e SELECT ITEMS FOR REVIEW BASED ON TOPIC. COMPLEXI-BILITY. RESOURCE AVAILABILITY. FEEDBACK FROM CONSTRUCTION REVIEW AND OTHER DESIGN REVIEW .

.

9 DETERMINE LATEST "PR000CT" DOCUMENTS I

EXAMPLES:

-

DRAWINGS

-

LISTS (I.E.. INSTRUMENT. SETPOINT. ETC.)

-

VENDOR MANUALS

-

DESIGN REPORTS

-

PROCUREMENT / FABRICATION SPECIFICATIONS

-

UNINCORPORATED DESIGN CHANGE DOCUMENTS e DETERMINE APPLICABLE CRITERIA / INPUT DOCUMENTS EXAMPLES:

i

'

-

LICENSING (SAR. QUESTIONS. POSITIONS. OTHER)

-

DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS '

-

CALCULATIONS

-

DTHER DESIGN BASES

-

VENDOR MANUALS

-

,

INTERFACE DOCUMENTS I

-

STANDARDS. GUIDES

-

CODES

,

---y . -- -- .- ----m.-- , - . - - - - - - - - - _ - - . . - - - - - ~ , _ _ - - - - . . , , - - . ~ . _ - - - - _ _ - - ,,

_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . .

. .

l

,

o PREPARE CHECKLISTS APPROPRIATE TO SUBJECT SUCH AS:

-

APPLICABLE CRITERIA INCORPORATE 07

-

CORRECT DESIGN INPUT 7

-

VALIO ANALYTICAL N00ELS7 -

AS-BUILT FEEDBACK 7

-

DESIGN CHANGE CONTROL WORKING 7

-

EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION ADDRESSED PROPERLY 7

-

DESIGN DATA INTERFACE WORKIN67

-

SYSTEM INTERACTION CONSIDERED 7

-

DOCUMENT CONTROL WORKING 7 l e REVIEWS WILL BE CONOUCTED BY GUALIFIED ENGINEERS THAT ARE INDEPENDENT OF THE ORIGINAL DESIG e MANAGEMENT AND TEAM LEADERS lJR REVIEWS WILL BE CORPORATE (NON-PROJECT) ENGINEER e TEAM LEADERS FOR REVIEWS WILL HAVE EXPERIENCE IN CONOUCTING OTHER SIMILAR REVIEW EFFORT .

. .

'

l

,

i

,

e FINDINes DOCUMENTED ,

!

e MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF REsULTs ,

.

e FOLLOWue ACTIONITRACKING

-

NCRs

-

QFRs

-

DIRECTIVES

-

COMMITMENT TRACKING e FEEosAcx TO SussEQUENT REVIEWS I

e REPORTS OF REVIEWS SusMITTED TO NRC FOR REVIEW /

APPROVAL.

i e

'

I

,

l

.

i

. _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _

.

. .

.

CONSTRUCTION REVIEW e SAMPLE EACH CONTRACTORS WORK

.

.

e SAMPLE SIZE DEPENDENT ON NATURE AND AMOUNT OF WOR HISTORY OF CONTRACTOR AND THE RESULTS OF ANY SPECIAL PROGRAM e REVIEW WILL CONSIST OF REINSPECTION /WALKDOWNS USING THE SAME CRITERIA AS USED FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION e WALKDOWNS INCLUDE DESIGN ENGINEERS -

TO ASSESS EFFECT OF OTHER CONSTRUCTIO DEFICIENCIES WILL BE DOCUMENTED AND RESOLVE e THE NEED FOR INCREASED SAMPLING WILL BE BASED UPON THE NUMBER AND SIGNIFICANCE OF DEFICIENCIES.

u______--_

.. .s s - a m a a - ....

.

,

-

x ,

>

. . .

-

., .

. ,

..

-

, , ,

i N '

s. . .

' ,

b '

y., 3 ,y

'

s J'

, ,

1 g

.

,

. ht .l y '

'

i %.~

1 ,

,

. . .

J,.. INITIALJPHASE -'G0AL

,

, _

t

.

N "

., .

. REVIEW.F0!t1CCEPTANCE.THEDESIGNd.ND, CONS.T,RUCTION

,

.,

,

%J ,

THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED'TO DAT THExRESULTS OF THE INITIAL PliASE WILL BE THE FIRST INCREMENTAL ACCEPTANC .: t

.

OF THE PROJEC 'O

-

's J ,\

' 3

s N- ,

,

, .

%

, \

_,% o 4 g D q

,i

%.

k

'

t

.

'.'

,

, $ .\ ,~ .

.. >

- ?

• ,

> ' %

\ s^

!

l I

+

( .

l

. -4 i a 5, +.

\, '

I l'

l . <

r

,b s i

'

i

'

.

e

{ s aY_- -

. _ _ _ - _ . _ _ . . - - _ _ - . - -

.

. .

.

n PRESERVATION

.

.

e PRESERVATION PROGRAMS HAVE BEEN IN PLACE SINCE DELAY BEGA e EQUIPMENT AND STRUCTURE CATEGORIZED BY ENGINEERIN e PRESERVE AT ALL COSTS e MINIMAL ATTENTION NEEDED e LEFT AS IS

e EQUIPMENT GROUPED BY GENERIC TYP e PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE WERE ESTABLISHED FOR GENERIC TYPE AND BASED ON THE EQUIPMENT'S CATEGOR .

h

.

. .

.

e SPECIAL MAINTENANCE FOR EQUIPMENT WERE IDENTIFIED BY EXCEPTION TO THE GENERIC TYP .

.

e THE PRESERVATION PROGRAM IS NOW IN PLACE AND IS BEING MONITORED FOR EFFECTIVENES e ADDITIONALLY. THE SUPPLY SYSTEM HAS A CORROSION MONITORING PROGRAM ESTABLISHED AT EACH PROJECT TO FEED CHANGES TO THE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENT e WORKING COPY OF WNP-3 PRESERVATION PROGRAM SENT TO REGION V ON APRIL 26, 198 e REQUEST EARLY MEETING TO DISCUSS DETAILED COMMENT . _ . - _ --- _ .. ..

.

. .

.

SECOND PHASE COMPLETE THE READINESS REVIEW PROGRAMS ,

.

e REVIEWS WILL INCLUDE CONTROL SYSTEMS PUT IN PLACE BY CONTRACTORS AT THE RESTARTED PROJECTS.

,

e REVIEWS WILL INCLUDE ALL OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS AND PUNCH-LISTED ITEMS FROM THE INITIAL PHAS e REVIEWS WILL BE CONDUCTED TO INCREMENTALLY ACCEPT THE PROJECT WORK AS IT PROGRESSES TOWARD LICENSING AND FUEL LOA e DETAILS OF THE SECOND PHASE WILL BE DISCUSSED l BEFORE RESTART OF CONSTRUCTIO e GDAL: COMPLETION OF THE SERIES OF REVIEWS WILL RESULT IN AN SER WITH NO OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS.

l l

l l

,

- - .

. .

.

SCHEDULE

.

NEAR TERM (APPROXIMATE DATES)

.

WEEK OF MAY 27, 1985 -

SUBMIT DRAFT PROGRAM DESCRIPTION OF DESIGN PORTION OF READINESS REVIE WEEK OF JUNE 10, 1985 -

MEETING TO DISCUSS:

o PRESERVATION PROGRAM e DESIGN REVIEW WEEK OF JUNE 24, 1985 -

SUBMIT FINAL VERSION OF PROGRAM DESCRIPTION OF l DESIGN REVIEW WEET. OF JULY 1, 1985 -

SUBMIT FINAL VERSION OF PRESERVATION PROGRAM

-

BEGIN IMPLEMENTATION OF DESIGN REVIEWS l

!

L

.

. .

.

NEAR TERM SCHEDULE (CONTINUED)

WEEK OF JULY 22, 1985 -

MEETING TO DISCUSS:

e CONSTRUCTION REVIEW ,

PORTION OF READINESS REVIEWS WEEK OF AUG. 12, 1985 -

SUBMIT INITIAL DRAFT OF PROGRAM DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION REVIEW WEEK OF SEPT. 9, 1985 -

MEETING TO DISCUSS:

o COMMENTS ON CONSTRUCTION REVIEW PROGRAM DESCRIPTION WEEK OF SEPT. 30, 1985 -

SUBMIT FINAL VERSION OF CONSTRUCTION REVIEW PROGPAM DESCRIPTION l

I WEEK OF JAN. 2. 1986 -

BEGIN IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTRUCTION REVIEW

,

, ,

t

SCHEDULE LONG TERM

.

DESIGN REVIEW START -

JULY 1. 1985 FIRST REPORT TO NRC - JANUARY. 1986 REVIEW REPORTS SUBMITTED TO NRC EVERY 3-4 MONTHS i THEREAFTE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW r START -

JANUARY. 1986 FIRST REPORT TO NRC - JULY 1986 l REVIEW REPORTS SUBMITTED TO NRC EVERY 2-3 MONTHS THEREAFTER.

l'

,

.- ,

BUDGET 12a5 1216 128Z CALENDER -

YEAR GIB1 _1_ 4 _1_ _2_ 3 4 _1_ _2_ _3_ 4 DESIGN 3 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 REVIEW CONSTRUCTION 1 2 4 5 7 8 8 8 8 8 REVIEWS MANAGEMENT / 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 QA COSTS:

TRAVEL $K 15 15 12 12 9 9 9 9 9 9 NRC 7 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?