IR 05000483/1984007
| ML20244C874 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 03/28/1984 |
| From: | Creed J, Pirtle G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20087N163 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-483-84-07, 50-483-84-7, NUDOCS 8404030181 | |
| Download: ML20244C874 (4) | |
Text
,
t
'
.
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Report No. 50-483/84-07(DRMSP)
License No..CPPR-139
-
Docket No. 50-483
-
.
Licensee:
Union Electric Company Post Office Box 149 - Mail Code 400 St. Louis, MO 63166 Facility Name: Callaway County Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Inspection At: Callaway County, M0 Inspection Conducted: March 5-6, 1984 on Site March 14, 1984 in Region III Office Type of Inspection: Pre-Operational Physical Protection Inspection Date of Previous Physical Protection Inspection: January 30-February 3, 1984 Inspector:
S,$ 9 M Des m^=4 2.B GM
'
G. L. Pirtle Date Physical Protection Specialist Approved By:
N#8!8 y R. Creed, Chief Date'
Safeguards Section
.
Inspection on March 5-6 and 14, 1984 (Report No. 50-483/84-07 (DRMSP) )
Areas Inspected:
Included a review of licensee's actions on previous inspection findings; schedule for implementation of the security program; progress in testing of security related equipment; and access controls for personnel.
The inspection involved 14 inspector-hours by one NRC inspector.
Two of the.14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> were com-pleted at the NRC Regional Office.
Results:
Nine of twenty-four inspection findings identified in Report 50-483/84-05
.
(DRMSP) were closed.
Extensive discussions were held with licensee representatives pertaining to full implementation of the security. program which continues to be a major concern.
'
(Details - UNCLASSIFIED )-
.
-
-
( {YhY Enclosure contains SAFEGUARDS lif0li:h.jTION Upon separation this
.i y
5, pageisDecontrogs )/ fr "3L T ,
'
_ - ..m ., n , ,, s , i 4nn ,o, N l k '. k k.
k' VIM i i 1111 ' DETAILS lWARNINGT ' Unauthorized Diccio ure is Prohibits 1.
Key Persons contacted Section 147 Atemic C gy Act 1954 And 10.CTR 73.21. Vielutions Subjet
- P. Appleby, Assistant Manager, Union Electric (UE) 'To Civil And Criminal Sanctions.
- L. Kanuckel, Quality Assurance Assistant Engineer (UE)
D. Fonner, Security System Engineer (UE)
- G. Pendergraff, Superintendent of Security (UE)
- J. Clark, Assistant Superintendent of Security (UE)
- B. Scott,' Site Security Supervisor, Burns International Security Se rvices, Inc. (BISSI)
- G. Hill, Site Training Supervisor (BISSI)
- R. Watts, CAS/SAS Training Instructor (BISSI)
- J. Snavely, District Manager (BISSI)
B. Little, Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC Region III The inspector also interviewed other security force personnel during the inspection.
- Denotes those present at the exit meeting on March 6, 1984.
2.
Licensee's Actions on Previous Inspection Findings , The following inspection findings identified in paragraph 3.d of Inspection Report 50-483/84-05(DRMSP) are considered closed (references in parenthesis after each finding denotes the paragraph number in Inspection Report 50-483/ 84-05 (DRMSP) : a.
Test sources have been obtained for explosive detectors (3d(1)). b.
Metal detectors were modified to allow detection of firearms (3d(2)).
Duress alarms were verified as functional (3d(4)). c.
d.
The Hotline (ring-back) phone for the CAS/SAS had been installed and was functional (3d(6)). Permanent batteries and chargers had been installed for security radio e.
consoles (3d(9)). f.
A barrier had been installed on the Refueling Water Storage Tank
1 adder (3d(14)). Outriggers on part of the PA fence where concrete was recently poured g.
had been repaired (3d(18)). h.
Psychological evaluation determinations for the security force were l ) ( signed (3d(23)). J 1.
The proposed number and location of VA keys within the plant appear adequate (3d(24)). , , T en v n, m 1,, e
- 4h
.. > o,,, SIN .1 . N
it1 ' 1I i1 k IVlM i 1 , - l d, E ~ .J
t= 1. sin i u.
,, , sg ,1 ,,,, ,. ' _ ' 5 \\ I i \\ l' f P'% R lt], g . (1) Licensee personnel would continue to obtain.securAty badges but the turnstiles would not be used due to security computer problems (refer to paragraph 5 for related information).
Search equipment would also continue to be used.
Contractor personnel would be exempt from badging and search requirements until March 24, 1984.
(2) Effective March 17, 1984, licensee vehicles entering the Protected Area would be controlled.
(3) Effective March 24, 1984, Protected and Vital Area access would be fully implemented for licensee personnel, except for three security doors which would be guarded by Security personnel.
Construction personnel would be exempt from using card readers and would enter areas of the plant controlled by posted watchmen.
One or two openings within the Protected Area perimeter fence would be used for entry / exit of construction personnel. This configuration would place partial day-to-day operational demands on the security computer system.
(4) Effective April 6, 1984 all Protected and Vital Area portals and alarms would be closed and monitored and the security program would be fully implemented.
No personnel would be exempt from program requirements.
, The licensee representatives were advised that the new schedule continued c.
to be a major concern.
Adherence to past schedules had been poor and the delay in implementation further reduces the time available to resolve technical problems encountered with the security computerized system.
The ' licensee was also advised that failure of the security system to support the March 24, 1984 partial implementation date may warrant discussions with the Regional staff at the Region III Headquarters.
The licensee stated that the necessity to complete construction acti-vities primarily caused the delay in implementation.
Approximately 4,500 personnel required access to the site until early April.
Existing security facilities could not efficiently process that number of personnel in a timely manner.
d.
Extensive discussions were held during the onsite visit with the Superin-tendent of Security pertaining to progress in implementation of the , security program. Problems with security equipment, the proposed imple-(mentationschedule,personnelscreeningprogress,statusofordered
~ security badges, and status of the March 1984 QA audit of the security program were topics discussed.
5.
Testing and Maintenance (MC81142B) The inspector discussed the licensee's progress with completion of acceptance testing of security equipment. The status of equipment acceptance testing is as follows: a.
Vital Area Doors: Security equipment acceptance testing for all but four vital area doors has been completed. Acceptance testing for the ' , y <.. ,,. m , ,- m , _ , .. - n\\N \\]l. N \\' b lh ,h k 5V2 N l l u E' E ' N# 4 9 e
_ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - -_ -_- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ [n[ __ _ _ _ - - - - ,, n nc
ri > si n ri u m n . n um .i
5 V N ' ' ' ' and secondary computers which control the terminals, console operator errors, and uncontrolled reconfiguration of the system which can and has
' brought down the primary computer without the secondary computer assumi operation.
The re-configurations pose the most difficult problem at this time.
The licensee has requested vendor hardware and sof tware expertise support and vendor representatives have been onsite to address the q problem.
The licensee feels the problem is primarily software-related { at this time but their analysis is continuing.
for turnstile card readers were not implemented on MarchUse of security badges j 10, 1984 due to computer system problems.
Total integration of the computerized system has yet to be accomplished.
March 24, 1984.
Partial integration is planned for { Discussions with the Security System Engineer also disclosed that the licensee is considering providing primary security system maintenance support through contractors.
A final determination has not been made.
6.
Access Control - Personnel (MC81170B) The licensee has continued review of personnel screening results and a.
issuance of security badges.
Verification of completion of screening requirements for contractor personnel needs to be completed prior to implementation of the security program. The UE Quality Amaurance Department conducted an audit of the UE screening program at Corporate Headquarters during January 9-18, 1984.
Six deficiencies were noted.
Three of the deficiencies were described as programmatic, the remaining three deficiencies were described as implementation deficiencies.
The f audit deficiencies require correction / resolution prior to issuance of an operating license.
, b.
DELETED - Not within the scope of this reouest.
w . O h e ~~ i; f , Qlh" 4-) f 4. -6 '" l ,
, .'j A 'j ' ' 0,' l ' " ' II l 'u'Al '! '5 ' . , . - . WAY 10 W . E' P ' Docket No. 50-483 Docket No. 70-2915 Union Electric Company ATTN: Mr. Donald F. Schnell Vice President - Nuclear Post Office Box 149 Mail Code 400 St. Louis, MO 63166 . Gentlemen: This refers to the pre-operational physical protection inspection and SNM Control and Accountability inspection conducted by Messrs. G.:.L. Pirtle, J. R. Kniceley and J. R. Creed of this office on April 2-13 and 23,1984, of activities at the Callaway County Nuclear Station, Unit 1, authorized by NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-139 and to the discussion of our findings with Mr. S. Miltenberger and other members of your steff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas exexined during the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and t interviews with personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in non- , compliance with NRC requirements, as described in the enclosed Appendix.
The inspection showed that action had been taken to correct the. identified noncom-pliance and to prevent recurrence.
Consequently, no reply to this noncompli-ance is required and we have no further questions regarding this matter at l this time.
, The enclosed report does contain certain findings which must be corrected and/or resolved prior to issuance of an operating license. These findings will be reviewed during future pre-operational inspections.
No written response is needed at this time.
j . Adherence to a security system implementation schedule and validation of l screening results for personnel issued security badges continue to warrant I management review and oversight.
Enclosure contains SAFEGUARDS INFCTJ1ATION i Upon separation this page is Decontrolled -
,y
hI pur e7o s - U\\ T.
~SA l ' 'A ll Z l ',' l Mv' Al 'l u ,
ESA A l IS N lUl 1 M "".
. . . Union Electric Company
tM 10 W Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject matter which is exempt from disclosure according to Section 73.21(c)(2) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 73, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
This information must be handled and protected in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 73,21.
Consequently, the enclosure to this letter and our report of this ir.spedion will not be placed in the Public Document Room.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
I
Sincerely, I If{ W.
Ax o, Chief Materials and Safeguards Branch' i Enclosures: 1.
Appendix, Notice of Violation 2.
Inspection Report
No. 50-483/84-17(DRMSP) (UNCLASSIFIEDSAFEGUARDS i INFORMATION) cc w/cncis: W. H. Weber, Manager, Nuclear Construction S. E. Miltenberger, Plant Manager IE File IE/DQASIP/ORPB . IE/ES NMSS/SGPL NRR/DL/SSPB ACRS cc w/encls, w/o UNCLASSIFIED . : DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS) Resident Inspector, RIII Region IV K. Drey Enclosure contains Chris R. Rogers, P.E. SAFEGUARDS INFORIMTION Utility Division, Missouri Upon separation this Public Service Commission page is Decontrolled II II RIII RK RIII f le/jp gLhiceley d Ike Ax ! 5f(T ' / $-2 /04/84
SA
A ? 13
- n a A
uc; 1 }}