IR 05000445/1978023
| ML19261B544 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/04/1979 |
| From: | Crossman W, Randy Hall, Rosenberg A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19261B542 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-445-78-23, 50-446-78-23, NUDOCS 7902280166 | |
| Download: ML19261B544 (7) | |
Text
.
k U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTI0tl AtlD ENFORCEMENT REGI0ft IV Report No. 50-445/78-23; 50-446/78-23 Docket No. 50-445; 50-446 Category A2 Licensee:
Texas Utilities Generating Company 2001 Bryan Tower Dallas, Texas 75201 Facility Name:
Comanche Peak, Units 1 & 2 Inspection at:
Comanche Peak Site, Glen Rose, Texas Inspection conducted:
December 18-20, 1978 ed
/['
-f
- -
Inspectors:
A. B. Rosenberg, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Date'
Support Section (Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 & 4)
31_cr k _.
1/2l[79
.
A. B. Beach, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Support Date Section (Paragraph 3)
Reviewed-b
/[f
R. G. Taylor, Resident inspector, Projects Section Date m-
--
//f!79 Approved:
W W. A. Crossman, Chief, Projects Section Date
- - l r l
-
,
.A
{ if-7/
<
R. E. Hall, Chief, Engineering Support Section Date 7 9 0 2 2 8 01(o b
.
Inspection Summary:
Inspection on December 18-20,1978 (Report No. 50-445/78-23; 50-446/78-23)
Areas inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of construction activi-ties related to an overall review and inspection of the licensee's site QA program implementation.
Specific areas inspected included the QA/QC organization, document control, design control, procurement control, equipment installation control and audits.
The inspection involved forty-five inspector-hours on site by two NRC inspectors.
Results:
No items of noncanpliance or deviations were identified.
-2-
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Principal Licensea Personnel
- D. E. Deviney, TUSI, QA Technician
- H. O. Kirkland, TUSI/B&R, Project General Manager
- J. T. Merritt, TUSI, Resident Manager
- R. G. Tolson, TUGCO, Site QA Supervisor
_0ther Personnel R. Backer, Procurement Vendor Surveiliance, Brown & Root (B&R)
J. Davis, QA Supervisor, B&R R. V. Fleck, Civil Inspection Supervisor, Gibbs & Hill (G&H)
C. W. Killough, Site Surveillance Coordinator, B&R R. Murray, Field Support Design Group, B&R R. M. Osborne, Senior QC Supervisor, B&R R. C. Scott, Site QA Manager, B&R K. W. Silverthorne, QC Engineer-Mechanical, B&R R. Taylor, Document Control Supervisor, B&R The IE inspectors also interviewed other licensee and contractor personnel d-ing the course of the inspection.
- denotes those present at the exit interview.
2.
Site Tour The IE inspectors toured the various areas of the site to observe construction activities in progress and to inspect housekeeping.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Mid Term Construction Pennit QA Inspection The mid term QA inspection is performed to determine whether the establishment and implementation of the site quality assurance program for past, current and upcoming site related activities in the areas of design, procurement, and construction are con-sistent with the status of the project and the Quality Assurance program described in the Safety Analysis Report.
The specific areas inspected included: QA/QC organization; QA manual-document control; procurement control; control of equipment installations; and audits. Mr. R. G. Taylor (NRC Resident Inspector) performed a portion of the mid term QA inspection concerning Qualty Assurance manuals review.
The manuals review of the inspection is documented in inspection report No. 50-445/78-20; 50-446/78-20.
-3-
a.
QA/QC Organization Brown & Root is the designated constructor for Comanche Peak Stear r!ectric Station (CPSES). The B&R QA and QC Managers repo,
- rectly to the TUGC0 Site QA Supervisor.
The TUGC0 Siic Supervisor also has three non-B&R supervisors report-
,
ing directly to him (Civil Inspection, Product Assurance and Records Management).
The IE inspector determined that personnel were assigned re-sponsibility for: (1) continuing development of QA/QC procedures; (2) inspections; (3) audits and site surveillance; and (4)
management of the site QA/QC program implementation.
b.
QA Manual Document Control The QA manual and QA manual procedures were reviewed with two individuals that were assigned unrelated QA/QC activities.
The civil discipline manual and the civil quality procedures were reviewed with the Civil Inspection Supervisor. The ASME me-chanical discipline manual and the mechanical quality procedures were reviewed with the QC Mechanical Engineer.
Each individual discussed in general the QA/QC document control portions of their respective manuals and their responsiblities in relation to QA/QC activities.
s Several procedures from the QA/QC manual documents were selected and were made available by each of the individuals.
The indi-vidual then verified that the documents were not superseded by a later revision. The Civil Inspection Supervisor verified the following procedures were to the most current revision:
Ql-QP-ll.0-1 Cadweld Inspection Activities CP-QP-ll.0 Civil Inspection Activities The QC Mechanical Engineer verified the following procedures were to the most current revision:
Ql-QAP-10.3-2 Welder Surveillance CP-QAP-10.1 Field Inspection
_4-
.
c.
Design Control Site-originated design activities are controlled by CPP-EP-1.
This procedure was reviewed with the Field Support Design Supervisor, as were the field documents used for site-origi-nated design changes. This review included a discussion as to how tne requirements of CPP-EP-1 were being implemented within the design activities being followed at the site.
A general sampling of five design changes indicated timely resolution and close out.
Licensee surveillance records of site-design activities were also reviewed.
Surveillance records, specif%11y audits TGH-4 and TGH-8, indicated timely surveillars and audits are being performed by the licensee as prescribed by ANSI N45.2.11.
d.
Drawing Control Drawing control procedures for both on-site and off-site originated drawings were reviewed. The Document Control Supervisor reviewed his responsibilities in relation to the Brown & Root and/or TUSI QA manual provisions for the Document Control Center.
A sampling of approximately ten drawings were reviewed to verify that reproducibles were available and to verify that the drawings i are to the most current revision.
The individual then reviewed the procedures used in the Document Control Center to ensure that a drawing revision was consistent with the revision number indicated on the drawing b9ing used.
Facilities relating to storage and control of both working and design drawings were physically examined.
Microfilm and card facilities were also toured.
e.
Procurement Control Site-originated procurement activities are controlled by the Brown & Root and/or TUSI QA manual. These procedures were reviewed with the Vendor Surveillance Supervisor.
The Vendor Surveillance Supervisor reviewed the QA manual provisions re-lative to his job function.
Facilities used for the storage and control of all procurement documents were physically examined.
A general description of how documents were reviewnd for quality input and checked to ascertain compliance with the specifications was then explained by the Vendor Surveillance Supervisor.
-5-
'
.
Two separate procurement packages were investigated; one was selected for structural support materials (AFC0 Steel, Job Number 35-1195-18G27), and one was selected for weld rod materials (Chemtron, Job Number 35-1195-20726).
The proper standards were specified and the proper material certifications were provided.
Each supplier had been prequalified, and all of the activities investigated were performed as required by the applicable procedures.
From a review of audits TCP-1 and TCP-2, it was verified that surveillance and audits were being performed of site-procurement activities.
f.
Control of Equipment Installations The IE inspector reviewed the installation documentation for four components: pressurizer; diesel generators; positive displacement pumps (chemical and volume control system); and ventilatioci exhaust filter racks.
These components were in various stages of installation from stored-in-place to prelim-inary alignment.
Mechanical and electrical hook-ups were not complete.
The rigging and mechanical installation travelers were reviewed and found to reflect a logical sequence for the installations.
Quality Control routinely verifies that the approved traveler, which includes the specific installation procedures is available at the installation.
Where portions of the installations were complete, the travelers were appro-priately signed off.
In the case of the diesel generator, the travelers reflected the installation requirements of the manufacturer.
g.
Audits The IE inspector reviewed the licensee and constructors audit and site surveillance activities.
The specific topics dis-cussed in the audits and site surveillance activities include procurement, document control, receiving inspection, concrete construction, piping and cable trays.
Each of the eighteen quality assurance criteria of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B were reviewed on an annual basis or more frequently.
The records reviewed for six audits indicated that findings were consist-ently corrected and followed up.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
-6-
'
..
4.
Exit Interview The IE inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in para-graph 1) and Mr. R. G. Taylor (NRC Resident Inspector) at the con-clusion of the inspection on December 20, 1978.
The IE inspectors s
summarized the purpose, scope and findings of the inspection.
,
-7-