IR 05000445/1973001

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Regulatory Operations Insp Repts 50-445/73-01 & 50-446/73-01 on 730215.No Unresolved Items or Enforcement Actions Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Organizations,Reactor Operator Insp, Operator Responsibilities & inspector-licensee Relationship
ML20212N861
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 03/01/1973
From: Flora J, Madsen G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20212N850 List:
References
FOIA-87-119 50-445-73-01, 50-445-73-1, 50-446-73-01, 50-446-73-1, NUDOCS 8703130187
Download: ML20212N861 (6)


Text

.

m

. .

. ,,

.

.

n U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION i REGION IV DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS

I g. ;4 RO Inspection Report No. 73-01 License N Texas Utilities Services, In Priority

.

Comanche Peak Electric Stations Units 18e 2

'

Category A-1 Type of Licensee: Westinghouse,1150 Mwe (PWR)

I i

Type of Inspection: Announced, Initial Corporate Management Meeting i Date of Inspection: February 15, 1973 Date of Previous Inspection: None t

j Principal In spector: Not Currently Assigned 1.Q

.Sa 47A.l.i l Regulatory Operations Representatives:

bw L

~

t*ltG e5 3

-

, . lora, Director, RO:IV Date

.

,I 2 d 4L.L,a a,hs G. L. Madsen, Chief, Reactor Construction and Date Operations Branch, RO:IV

Reviewed by:  !* bD T J. \ . Flora, Director, RO:IV Date l

'

Proprietary Information:

Fo14-07-1I9 None (continued)

i

,

8703130187 PDR FOIA 8701)))

WILLIAM 87-119 PDR

_

_.-.

. . - . - - - - - - . . . - - - - - - - . - - --

'

.

  • '

.

.gg' 'y

..

.f

.

,

, , .

,

- - .. .

,

,

..

.

. .

.

.

,.

. .

.. .

.>

'cca

.

J. G. Keppler, RO:HQ (1) .

-

j- .

- *

J. B. Henderson,.RO:HQ (1)

3 .

RO:HQ (5) .

'

DR Central Files (1) ~

.....

'

RS- Q (3)

~

'

.

'

'

, '

HQ (13) .

PDR:HQ (1) '

-

'a .

NSIC (1)

.

DTIE (1)

. .

+ -

.;

-

' -

. . . . .

,

.

'

-

- -

,, ., .

. . ,

. .

. .

.

i ..

,

, . .

, .

.

.

.

i .

.

.

-

. .

..

I

-! .,

. .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. .

- ,

' ,

-

-

,_ ,

t

.

,

.

.  : .

, , .

-

.

. ,

-

.

. . -

, .

,

-

.-

.

t .

A

.

. . . . .

..

..1 -

.

.

, ,

..

t . .. .. .

.

. .

.

..

,, . .

-

- .

.

. ..

'.

'

-

. . . .

  • * *

,, . e .

n *

, ,

. *.

b

.

i ' *

, _

, .-

.

.

.

t .

. . .

, t

'

. .

__ _

.

..y- .

.

-

.

-

,

4+ , :. .

.

.

..

. .

-2-

..

., .

Enforcement Action

.

-!. None A

-

Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters None s Unresolved Items -

s=

.Q

'

,

,

None Status of Previously Identified Unresolved Items

None 3)-

i Persons Contacted n

---i;

.

The following corporate officers and technical staff personnel were

. pres'ent at a corporate level meeting held at the Texas Utilities J. . Services, Inc. offices in Dallas, Texas, on February 15, 1973:

JL c';T Texas Utilities Services, Inc. (TUSI)

v c:

M a-

"O P. G. Brittain, Executive Vice President

? J. L. Forbis, Vice President Design & Construction R. W. Caudle, Project Manager-Nuclear Plants J H. C. Schmidt, Manager-Quality Assurance

C. W. Garrard, Manager-F6el D. N. Chapman, Project Engineer - Site B

'

,

J

)' , '

I . R.' H. Hickman, Project Engineer - Comanche Peak

!

e y '. D. T. Keating, Nuclear Engineer

,

, f'

.l Atomic Energy Commission - Directorate of Regulatory Operations I 9; ,

'

-

l '-

l , J. ,W. Flora, Director, Denver Office

.j '

G! L. Madsen, Chief, Reactor Construction and Operations Branch

?!

4-

..,,

). ,/

.

,

l ,

(continued)

~; ,>

' '

j S f p

.

l g

. f

'

,

/

-

4  : ..

-

_

e r -

e~<' .+

, - - . - . , . . . . _ , . , , - . . _ , , . . , _ _ _ . - . , . , . . , . _ , , _ , . _ - . , _ , , . _ _ . . - . - , _ _ _ , _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ , , , . _ , _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ . , , _ _ - - . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _

.. , .

, g - -- -- --

, { ~

n

~ a 7 .

.'

.

n o l *

.t

,

,,

'

,

_G

&

Management Interview

'

i .

The following subjects were discussed with the corporate officers

'

and technical personnel listed above:

l !. The Regulatory and RO organizations, and the DL-RO

., -

relationshi . ,

.I- A typical RO inspection, frequency of inspections, the infor-

'i mation needs of the inspector and the necessity for pertinent records to be readily availabl The RO inspection' responsibilities and methods of communicating with the licensee, with particular emphasis on the management interview at the conclusion of each inspectio ;

i The inspector-licensee relationship and the requirements for

.[ clear channels of communication The qualification requirements for the RO inspectors and the inspector's code of ethic The enforcement procedures avaiIable to RO, including civil penaltie !

The RO inspection reporting system and the introduction of

_ documents into the Public Document Roo .-

l' The conclusion which the regulatory staff must reach before an operating license can be issued and the role of RO in

3

-

reaching the conclusio i l The needs of RO relative to ready access to licensee and

"I contractor personne E The necessity for complete documentation of deviations, (

-

including methods of resolution and approval .

c

-

'

,

'

'$

, The' RO vendor inspection programs and the utilization of
consultants in areas of specialized concer o (continued)

1 '

l

s

.

.f -

- . . . . - . - .

O ._ _ . _ , _ _ ~ . _ _

._ ._ _ --. __ _ _ _ . - -

- '

r. . ..

. ; I +

_ ; .

y * ..- *

-Q

.

.

The security requirements for nuclear power plants and the general implications upon the design of the facilit The nonradiological environmental matters and the

!

'

,

associated involvement of R ja.-

- The nec'essity for advising RO promptly of significant discrepancies and a general coverage of regulatory

<

reporting requirement c- The need for correlating vendor procurement and site Y: construction to the Safety Analysis Report, and the

,

advantages associated with maintaining the Safety Analysis

, Report curren ; An explanatioh of the requirements for a QA program, as

_

. defined by Appendix B,10 CFR 50. The following were

,

included:

i

__ { ~ The responsibilities of licensee . Degree of involvement by the license y 7 ., - Independence of the QA organizatio j.q.,

/u g Involvement in the vendor program n.: .

1 Audit program . ,.

Programs for corrective action . Establishment of permanent documentation.

,.

!

'a; Comments by TSUI relating to policies / procedures being

'

planned to implement the Appendix B criteria. A representative

] .

of TUSI asked if RO would be able to review and comment g on the QA program content prior to their submission of an C application. He was informed that it could be done, providing (

'$ that there is a clear understanding that such comments would

'

g in no way prejudice the later review by the Directorate of M:y Licensing staff, or future RO findings. Such an understanding

[, was acknowledge c The presentation of examples and RO experiences in the l 9 inspection of site construction and component fabrication.

l The emphasis regulatory places on QA/QC records for obtaining objective evidence relative to the quality of the plant. The

, need for complete, accurate, and technically useful recorris

-

was stressed.

[

i !. (continued)

,

-

b *% " " b. 9 '

..

, . . . J.:. . -

,,.

- *

.

-

q q

. -

. . ..- .- ,

. -5-

.

[. ,

A discussion of the planned initial RO QA inspection, for the

'

! purpose of reviewing the TUSI QA Manual to determine the

_ :- method and degree of response to the requirements of 10 CFR i 50,- Appendix B and the PSAR. Special emphasis, during the Sff* ~

initial QA inspection, will be placed on the controls relating to

{- design, engineering, procurement, and vendor inspectio ;. , ,

~:.,.

a h

E

! =

t

, w' I e

'x

!.

I b

i

.

e

f a

e a

.

,,8 ... - . . -w%..-- -. - * - -- - - - = ~ * - * = - - + - <

  • s e . W _., a -,. - ,, , - . - . , , , , , - ,--,-----g-. .-,.,,----me- . ,--- , . - - - - , - - , - , -.----,g--.,-