IR 05000423/1986006
| ML20137Z901 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 03/04/1986 |
| From: | Pasciak W, Struckmeyer R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137Z898 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-423-86-06, 50-423-86-6, NUDOCS 8603130226 | |
| Download: ML20137Z901 (15) | |
Text
r -
s
>
.
,
as h
r U.S.' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION., I
'
,
,
Report No.
50-423/86-06
,
. Docket No.
50-423
License No.
NYF-44 Priority Category C
-
.
Licensee:
Northeast Nuclear Energy Company P.O. Box 270
.
. Hartford, Connecticut 06101 Facility Name:
Millstone Nuclear Power ~ Station, Unit 3 Inspection At:
Waterford, Connecticut
,,
s
,
Inspection Conducted: _ January 27'-31, 1986 i
.,
Inspector:
f
- ayL-~.
2/27/7f
.
Richard K. Struckme,c( Radiation Specialist
/
da'te
'I
i Approved th: _
.
p
_ _ b(dth
$ 1.$ h
_
' -
Wa ter J. Pasc iak, Chief
, dane V
Effluents Radi ation Protection Section b
,
J
'
s Inspection Summary:
,
Inspection on January 27-31, 1986 (Report No. 50-423/86-06)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the cSemistry and radio-
_
yq active ef fluent control programs, with emphasis on activities related to startup. Areas reviewed included testing of liquid and gdeous ' radioactive waste processing, storage, and release systems; chemical and radiochemical tests;- radfoactive ef fluent release records; effluent control procedures; status of radiation monitoring system; qualifications of chemistry personnel; and licensee action on previously identified items.
The inspection involved 37 inspector-hours onsite by one regionally-based inspec, tor.
,
'
Results: Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompiiance were identified.
i
-.
- \\
.
$
'O y3 i
et
.
.
DETAILS 1.0 Individuals Contacted G. Ballassi, Site Engineer, NUSCO B. Bodnar, Assistant Supervisor, Computer Services R. Brogdon, Computer Services M. Brown, I&C Supervisor, Unit 3 R. Enoch, Assistant I&C Supervisor, Unit 3 R. Grebasch, Startup Engineer, NNECO
- R. Langer, Assistant Chemistry Supervisor, Unit 3
- T. Lyons, Startup Engineer, NNECO R. Olsen, I&C Engineer, NUSCO D. Powers, Startup Engineer, S&W L. Rayburn, Associate Scientist, RAB, NUSCO
- R. Sachatello, Radiation Protection Supervisor, Unit 3
- J. Waters, Chemistry Supervisor
" Indicates those present at exit meeting on January 31, 1986.
2.0 Status of Previously Identified Items (0 pen) Inspector Follow-up Item (50-423/85-19-01):
Status of Radiation Monitoring System (RMS).
Phase II testing, involving the communications
'
!
capability between monitors and the RMS computer, has been completed. One of two Containment High-Range Monitors, 3RMS*RE04, has been installed with a short cable at an alternate location from the original design. Addi-tional details regarding the status of the RMS are provided in Paragraph 4.
Monitor status is also depicted in Attachment I to this report.
(0 pen) Inspector Follow-up Item (50-423/85-19-02):
Status of RMS Sur-veillance Procedure and Generic Procedure development. All previously
identified surveillance procedures pertaining to calibration and operability testing of RMS monitors have been written and PORC approved.
'
The status of these procedures is indicated in Attachment II.
Two new procedures have been added to cover additional Containment High-Range monitors (further discussed in Paragraph 4).
The calibration procedure has received PORC approval; the operational test had not been approved as of the date of this inspection.
The status of RMS generic procedures (I&C procedures) is given in Attachment III.
Five procedures have not yet been approved.
(0 pen) Inspector Follow-up Item (50-423/85-42-01): Training of NNECO chemistry technicians, and training and Qualifications of contractor technicians.
The licensee stated that the qualifications of contractor
_ _ _
.
chemistry technicians will be documented in accordance with normal NNECO procedures. The licensee stated that this documentation will be completed by February 28, 1986.
Further details are provided in Paragraph 3.
(Cloeed) Inspector Follow-up Item (50-423/85-42-03):
Status of liquid and gaseous radwaste systems.
The majority of preoperational testing required to demonstrate the operability of these systems has been completed.
This item is incorporated into Inspector Follow-up Item 50-423/86-06-01.
(Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item (50-423/85-42-05):
Status of chemistry analytical and surveillance procedures. All required procedures have been written and PORC approved.
The inspector reviewed selected procedures and found them acceptable.
(Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item (50-423/85-42-06):
Status of Phase II startup procedures for liquid and gaseous radwaste systems and ventilation systems. All procedures for these systems have been completed or are in progress.
The procedures were reviewed for content and administrative control, and were found to be satisfactory.
Two procedures (LWS and ventilation system flitration testing) nave not yet been completed.
This is further discussed in Paragraph 5.
This item is incorporated into Inspector Follow-up Item 50-423/86-06-01.
(Closed) Inspector Follow up Item (50-423/85-42-07):
Status of filtra-tion system (HEPA and charcoal) surveillance test procedures. All tests required by Technical Specifications for filtration systems needed to support fuel load and power ascension have been performed, reviewed, and noted in the minutes of Joint Test Group meetings.
The test for fuel building HEPA and charcoal filtration has not been performed.
This is further discussed in Paragraph 4.
This item is incorporated into Inspector Follow-up Item 50-423/86-06-01.
(Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item (50-423/85-65-03): Health Physics to establish control charts for laboratory gamma spectroscopy systems.
The inspector reviewed Revision No. 12 to Procedure HP 908/2908/3908C, which incorporates provisions for establishing control charts and utilizing them on a daily basis as a means for checking the performance of its gamma spectroscopy systems.
The procedure also states acceptance criteria and instructions for actions to be taken if the criteria are not met.
t 3.0 Training and Qualifications
In a previous inspection (50-423/85-65), a representative of the lic.ensee's chemistry training organization stated that additional refresher training l
and testing would be provided to three NNECO chemistry technicians who had
not passed examinations covering refresher training in nuclear physics, j
math, and/or chemistry. No decision had been made as to what action would
!
be taken if these technicians failed the subsequent tests.
The inspector will review the licensee's actions in this area in a future inspection,
f l
+
.
.
A chemistry department representative stated that contractor chemistry technicians would not receive the on going training that is provided to NNECO chemistry technicians because the contractor technicians are not expected to remain at the site indefinitely; they are primarily needed during startup.
The licensee also stated'that contractor technicians are permitted to perform required surveillance sampling and analyses under the direction of a qualified NNECO chemistry technician, although it is not considered necessary or feasible for the contractor technician to be in the presence of a NNECO technician while performing these activities.
Contractor technicians are not permitted to sign the surveillance docu-mentation forms.
The inspector stated that if contractor technicians are to be utilized indefinitely, they should be included in the training program and be qualified to sign surveillance forms.
The licensee stated that its long term plans have not been finalized.
The inspector discussed with the licensee the need to independently docu-ment the qualifications of its contractor chemistry personnel in order to demonstrate that these personnel meet the criteria of ANSI N18.1 - 1971.
The licensee stated that this documentation would be completed by Februa ry 28, 1986.
These issues will be reviewed in a future inspection (50-423/85-42-01).
4.0 Facilities and Equipment The inspector noted that all Phase II tests concerning liquid and gaseous waste processing systems have been completed or are nearing completion.
The waste evaporator portion of the liquid waste system (LWS) was still being tested at the time of this inspection.
This portion of the LWS is not needed to support the power ascension phase of the facility startup program.
The remainder of the LWS has been tested and is functional.
There is just one Phase 11 test procedure covering all filtration system component (HEPA and charcoal) testing; at the time of this inspection, the following filtration systems had been tested and had been reviewed and noted in the minutes of the Joint Test Group:
Control Room Emergency Ventilation, Auxiliary Building, and Supplementary Leak Collection and Release System (SLCRS).
These systems are required to support the various modes of operation during startup.
The remaining system required by Technical Specifications, the Fuel Storage Pool Air Cleanup System, is not required to be operable until irradiated fuel is in the storage pool.
This system has not yet been tested.
The Containment Air Filtration System, which is not required by Technical Specifications, has been tested, but the results had not yet been reviewed at the time of this inspection.
The entire test procedure (3-INT-2008), including the five appendices which cover the individual system tests, will receive final review and acceptance after all tests have been successfully complete.
.
_
.
l
'
4 i
- i
,
Phase 11 testing of the Radiation Monitoring System (RMS) has been
completed.
This test verified the communications capability between
]
individual monitors and the RMS computer. The majority of monitors are fully functional.
Some problems exist with individual units, involving alarms for high or low pressure, temperature, flow, or conductivity in
liquid process' lines.
Such problems can usually be attributed to changing l
conditions within various systems as the plant testing program progresses.
,
These are one or two instances each of detector failure, alert, or high
!
radiation alarms. As there is no appreciable radioactivity in plant l
)
systems, the alert and high radiation alarms are due to other causes;
{
e.g., loss of flow.
The licensee stated that problems are investigated
,
- '
as they occur, and corrected as quickly as they are diagnosed and parts
'
become available.
The inspector reviewed the status of the RMS and r
concluded that the system as a whole was operational, that the majority of
monitors were operational, and that the problems with individual monitors
'
were not a cause for concern at this time. The status of the individual i
L
!
RMS monitors is given in Attachment I.
A number of problems noted in the i
previous inspection of this area (50-423/85-65) have been corrected and l
thus no lenger appear in the comments section of the list.
The licensee stated that due to problems with the shielded cable supplied by the RMS manufacturer, one of the original Kaman Containment
,
!
High Range Monitors (3RMS*RE05) could not be installed prior to closing
the containment..The other Kaman high range monitor (3RMS*RE04) was
!
installed with a shorter cable at a location different from that orig-inally specified.
Sufficient usable cable was available to make this
,
i installation possible.
The licensee stated that a new high range monitor
!
(3RMS*RE05A), supplied by General Atomic, had been installed near the
location originally specified for 3RvS*RE05.
The installation, including cable, is complete up to the point of containment penetration.
The cable installation from the point of penetration to the control room has not I
been completed.
The licensee intends to install a second General Atomic
high range monitor (3RMS*RE04A) near the location originally specified for l
3RMS*RE04, probably during the first refueling outage.
No decision has
!
been made as to whether the two Kaman and two General Atomic monitors will supplement one another over the long term. Both systems will have direct i
l indication in the control room, but the General Atomic monitors will not j
interface with the RMS computer system.
The inspector stated that the j
status of the RMS would.again be examined during a subsequent inspection l
(50-423/85-19-01).
i
i 5.0 Dlans and Procedures
Phase II test procedures for the BRS, GWS, and RMS have been completed,
,
'
as have those portions of the LWS and filtration systems test procedures
,
necessary to support power ascension.
Review and acceptance of the test
!
results by the licensee's management will be examined in a future inspection.
Additional testing to be performed during power ascension i
include:
l
'
i (
'
l j
f
-
-..-..
-. _ _
_.
._--.----
.--.-- -
.- - -.-
__---.
_
k (
!
f
,
3-INT-8000, Appendix 8007, Radiation Monitoring System 3-INT-8000, Appendix 8008, Ventilation System Operability l
3-INT-8000, Appendix 8009, Plant Chemistry I
The completion, review, and acceptance of Phase II and above tests for the LWS, BRS, GWS, filtration systems, plant chemistry, and RMS will be
'
!
examined in a future inspection (50-423/86-06-01).
i
.
Startup Test No. 29. " Process and Effluent Radiation Monitoring System,"
which is described in Table 14.2-2 of FSAR Chapter 14, states, under Test i
Objective and Summary:
"This test will verify the operability of process and effluent radiation monitors.
... Samples will be taken at monitored points and analyzed, The results of the analysis will be compared to the readings of the monitor." The Acceptance Criteria for the test include the following statement:
"The process and ef fluent monitor responses are consistent with sample results." The inspector reviewed 3-INT-8000,
.
Appendix 8007, " Radiation Monitoring System," and noted that this test
),
procedure did not contain provisions for comparing process and effluent monitor readings to the results of analyses of samples taken at monitored j
points.
This was not considered an item of noncompliance because no j
testing had yet been performed.
The li
'see initiated a test change to add the necessary instructions and data mets to the test procedure for
'
monitors required by Technical Specifica61ons and/or by virtue of their
importance in monitoring real-time plant status and discharge paths to the l
environment.
The response of these monitors versus sample results will be
'
examined in a future inspection (50-423/86-06-02).
j l
i Chemistry analytical and surveillance procedures have been written and
'
approved. One RMS surveillance procedure and five generic (I&C) proce-i dures have not yet been approved.
These are in development or review
!
(50-423/85-19-02).
i
j 6.0 Exit Interview i
i The inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on January 31, 1986,
,
and summarized the purpose and scope of the inspection and the inspection i
findings. At no time during this inspection was written material provided
,
to the licensee by the inspector.
'
!
5 s
r
l m
i
)
'
r t
i i
,
i
^
- -,,,
-.n
_
-
n
,n----..
. -
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ____ _ _ __ ___ _ ________ _ -___ _ __ _- ___ _______. _ _ _ _ - _ _
.
.
ATTACHMENT I j
Radiation Monitoring System Status
I Instrument Number Mile-Field Communications (Mark No.)
stone Tested Loop Established Comments i
Ventilation / Gas Monitors 3HVRRE10A/B*
F X
X
3HVRRE19A/B*
F X
X
.
3HVRRE11A/B C
X X
3HVRRE12A/B C
X X
i i
l 3HVRRE13A/B C
X X
3HVRRE14A/B C
X X
l 3HVRRE15A/B C
X X
3HVRRE16A/B C
X X
3HVRRE17A/B C
X X
3HVRRE18A/B C
X X
3HVCRE91A/B C
X X
3CMSRE22A/B*
P X
X
!
3HVZRE09A/B C
X X
'
>
j 3HVQRE49A/B*
F X
X 3HVCRE16A/B'
F X
X
i Category 1E Monitors
I
.
i f
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
_
_
_
_
. _ - _ -
. - - -. - _ _ - - - _ -
___
_-
-
- - - -- ---
--
.
'
l
'
ATTACHMENT I (Continued)
Radiation Monitoring System Status
Instrument Number Mile-Field Communications (Mark No.)
stone Tested loop Established Comments
_
liquid Process Monitors 3CHSRE69 C
X X
Rad Alert Alarm 3CCPRE31 C
X X
3CNARE47 F
X X
Alarm indication (Note 1)
30ASRE50 F
X X
Alarm indication (Note 1)
3LWSRE70 F
X X
Alarm indication (Note 1)
l 3LWCRE65 F
X X
Alarm indication (Note 1)
'
3CNDRE07 F
X X
Alarm indication (Note 1)
3SSRRE08 F
X X
Alarm indication (Note 1)
35WPRE60A/B C
X X
3GWSRE48 C
X X
3ARCRE21 C
X X
3MSSRE75 C
X X
3MSSRE76 C
X X
'
3MSSRE77 C
X X
3MSSRE78 C
X X
l 3MSSRE79 C
X X
,
Note 1: Alarm may be due to one or more of the following:
High or low
,
,
pressure, temperature, flow, or conductivity.
'
i
- ---
- ---
.--,.,.e
,-,n
, _. _
_,.
. -. - - - - -. -,, - - - - -, -.. -,
-._----.--,n.,-e--a,.-e,,n e
nn.--r
-
,
.
.
.
,
ATTACHMENT I (Continued)
Radiation Monitoring System Status Instrument Number Mile-Field Communications (Mark No.)
stone Tested loop Established Comments Area Monitors 3RMSRE01 C
X X
3RMSRE02 C
X X
3RMSRE03 C
X X
3RMSRE06 C
X X
3RMSRE07 C
X X
3RMSRE08 F
X X
3RMSRE09 C
X X
3RMSRE10 C
X X
3RMSRE11 C
X X
3RMSRE12 C
X X
3RMSRE13 C
X X
3RMSRE14 C
X X
3RMSRE15 C
X X
3RMSRE38 C
X X
3RMSRES2*
C X
X 3RMSRE16 C
X X
3RMSRE17 C
X X
- Category IE Monitors
--
. _ - _ - - - _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _.
.
.
ATTACHMENT I (Continued)
Radiation Monitoring System Status l
.
Instrument Number Mile-Field Communications i
(Mark Nod stone Tested Loop Established Comments
,
Area Monitors 3RMSRE18 C
X X
.-
!
3RMSRE19 C
X X
3RMSRE20 C
X X
3RMSRE21 C
X X
3RMSRE22 C
X X
'
3RMSRE24 C
X X
3RMSRE25 C
X X
3RMSRE28 C
X X
3RMSRE29 C
X X
3RMSRE31 C
X'
X 3RMSRE32 C
X X
3RMSRE33 C
X X
3RMSRE34 C
X X
3RMSRE35 C
X X
3RMSRE36 F
X X
3RMSRE37 C
X X
'
i
.
- -
.--
_ - - - - -
. _ - -- - -
...
..
_..
- - - - - - - -.. -
I
,
.
,
i
f ATTACHMENT I (Continued)
l
}
Radiation Monitoring System Status I
- 1 I
!
>
l Instrument f
i Number Mile-Field Communications l
l (Mark No.)
stone
_ Tested Lo.o_p_Es tab _l i shed Comments (
i l
Area Monit_ ors l
!
__
i 3RMSRE04*
P X
X Installed at alternate
location with shorter
cable
i 3RMSRE05*
R Not installed; cable i
returned to manufacturer
[
for repairs
!
t l
3RMSRE04A*
R Not installed
!
i j
3RMSRE05A*
Installed with cable up j
to containment penetra-i j
tion, but not connected
]
to control room i
i
-
.
3RMSRE41*
F X
X i
\\
i 3RMSRE42*
F X
X
l
.
l i
,
t i
i
)
Milestone:
I F = Fuel load I
i, I
P = Post-core hot functional q
.
C = Commercial operation
!
.
I R = First refueling outage I
!
l l
'
I i
t i
<
]
- Category IE Monitors
!
I i
l l
- -
-
--
- ______ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_____ _ __
_ __ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _- _ _ _ __
_ _ _
-
.
l ATTACHMENT II RMS Surveillance Procedure Summary Procedure PORC
_ Number Monitor Identification Approval _
Comments 3449A01 3HVR-RE10A/B Vent Part/ Gas 10/25/85 66'6" Aux. B1dg. Cal. Proc.
3449A11 3HVR-RE10A/B Vent Part/ Gas 10/29/85 66'6" Aux. B1dg. Oper. Test 3449801 3HVR-RE19A/B $LCRS Part/ Gas 11/01/85 Cal. Proc.
3449811 3HVR-RE19A/B SLCRS Part/ Gas 10/29/85 Oper. Test 3449C01 3 CMS-RE22A/B CTMT Atmos.
10/29/85 Part/ Gas Cal. Proc.
!
3443C11 3 CMS-RE22A/B CTMT Atmos.
10/29/85 l
Part/ Gas Oper. Test I
i 3449001 35WP-RE60A/B CTMT Rectre.
Deleted Changed to I&C I
Cooler Sve. Water Outlet Proc. No. 3490 812 i
Cal. Proc.
340011 35WP-REC 0A/B CTMT Rectre.
Deleted Cooler Sve. Water Outlet Oper. Test 3L49E01 3RMS-RE41/42 Fuel Orop Monitor 10/29/85 51'4" Cal. Proc.
3449E11 3RMS-RE41/42 Fuel Drop Monitor 10/29/85 51'4" Oper. Test 3449E21 Fuel Pool Storage Criticality 09/03/85 Monitor Cal Proc.
3449E31 Fuel Pool Storage Criticality 09/06/85 Monitor Oper. Test 3449F01 3HVZ-RE09A/B Recom. Cub. A/B Deleted Changed to I&C Exh. 7'6" Cal. Proc.
Proc. No. 3490 805 3449F11 3HVZ-RE09A/B Recom. Cub. A/B Deleted Exh. 7'6" Oper. Test
_ - _ _
____________ _ ___ - _ -____ __-_ _____________-________________ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _
>
.
.
ATTACHMENT II continued)
RMS Surveillance Procedure Summary
' Procedure PORC Number Monitor Identification Approval Comments i
i 3449G01 3HVC-RE16A/B Control Bldg.
10/11/85
!
Inlet Cal. Proc.
l
!
3449G11 3HVC-RE16A/B Control Bldg.
10/03/85 Inlet Oper. Test j
3449H01 3RMS-RE04/05 Cont. HR Inter.
10/25/85 51'4" CTMT Cal. Proc.
I i
3449H11 3RMS-RE04/05 Cont. HR Inter 09/20/85 j
51'4" CTMT Oper. Test
-
3449J01 3HV0-RE49 ESF Part & Gas Rad.
11/05/85 l
Monitor Cal. Proc.
i 3449J11 3HV0-RE49 ESF Part & Gas Rad.
10/29/85 Monitor Oper. Test 3450001 3 MSS-RE75, 76, 77, 78 Main Stm.
Deleted Changed to I&C Rel. Line A-D Cal. Proc.
Proc. No. 3490 808
!
3450011 3 MSS-RE75, 76, 877, 78 Main Stm.
Deleted
!
Rel. Line A-D Oper. Test l
3450E01 3 MMS-RE79 Turb. Dev. Aux Fdw.
Deleted Changed to !&C Pump Dsch. Cal. Proc.
Proc. No. 3490 808
,
3450E11 3 MMS-RE79 Turb. Drv. Aux. Fdw.
Deleted Pump Dsch. Oper. Test i
3450F01 3CND-RE07 Waste Neut. Sump Rad.
09/23/85 (
Monitor Cal. Proc.
!
3450F11 3CND-RE07 Waste Neut. Sump Rad.
09/13/85
!
Monitor Oper. Test i
3450G01 30AS-RE50 Turb. Bldg. Floor 09/10/85 Drains Rad. Monitor Cal.
Proc.
3450G11 30AS-RE50 Turb. 01dg. Floor 09/13/85 Drains Rad. Monitor Oper.
l Test i
,
.
..
-
.
..
-
-
.
-
-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ - _ _ _ _
i l
\\
t
.
.
l ATTACHMENT II (Continued)
l RMS Surveillance Procedure Summary
.
Procedure PORC l
Number Monitor Identification Approval Comments
3450H01 3LWS-RE70 Liquid Waste Rad.
09/23/85 l
Monitor Cal. Proc.
3450H11 3LWS-RE70 Liquid Waste Rad.
09/17/85 t
'
Monitor Oper. Test
,
!
3450J01 3LWC-RE65 Regen. Evap. Rad.
09/23/85 l
Monitor Cal. Proc.
!
!
3450J11 3LWC-RE65 Regen. Evap. Rad.
09/13/85 l
Monitor Oper. Test 3450K01 3SSR-RE08 S/G Blowdown Rad.
09/23/85 Monitor Cal.
3450K11 35$R-RE08 S/G Blowdown Rad.
11/05/85 Monitor Oper. Test 3450L41 T/B Floor Drains, Regen. Evap.
11/19/85 and $/G Blowdown Source l
Check 3449H21 General Atomic Containment 01/07/86
)
Area High Range Rad. Monitor
) Added to cover Calibration
) surveillances for
) new Gereral 3449H31 General Atomic Containment In Devel-
) Atomic Monitors
,
l Area High Range Rad Monitor opment
)
l Operational Test
)
.
i I
l
_.
.
-..
.
..
-
_
.
l i
!
!
'
i
'
ATTACHMENT I!!
RMS__ Generic Procedure Summar,y
!
'
Generic I&C No.
Procedure Monitor
<
(GPIC),
No.
Identification S ta tu s/Com:nent
!
l 20.01 3490B01 Kaman Science (KMS-HRN) Radiation Approved * Rev. O l
Monitor I
20.02 3490B02 Kaman Science (KMG-HRH) Radiation Approved * Rev. O Monitor 20.03 3490B03 Kaman Science (KMPG) Radiation Approved * Rev. O Monitor I
20.04 3490B04 Kaman Science (KML) Radiation Approved * Rev. 1 Monitor I
!
20.05 3490B05 Kaman Science (KM3) Radiation In Review
Monitor
!
20.06 3490B06 Kaman Science Hydrogen Vent In Review
!
Monitor 20.07 3490B07 Deleted t
20.08 3490B08 Kaman $cience (KMA-HR) Radiation Approved * Rev. O i
Monitor
!
l
!
20.09 3!90B09 Deleted j
i l
20.10 3490816 kaman $ctence (KMA) Radiation Approved * Rev. 0
'
,
Monitor
i 20.11 3490811 Kaman Science Fuel Failure Monitor In Typing (
20.12 3490812 Kaman Science Service Water In Review f
Effluont Monttor 20.13 3490813 Eberline Radiation Monttor In typing
,
i
!
[
!
l
- Approval of these proceduros is by the !&C Departreent supervisor and the f
Startup Manager.
.
[
i
.