IR 05000410/1980003
| ML17053B755 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 06/09/1980 |
| From: | Cerne A, Feil R, Mcgaughy R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17053B754 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-410-80-03, 50-410-80-3, NUDOCS 8007180561 | |
| Download: ML17053B755 (4) | |
Text
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Report No.
Docket No.
Region I License No.
'CPPR-112 Priority Licensee:
Nia ara Mohawk Power Cor oration Category 300 Er'ie Boulevard West S racuse, New York 13202 Facility Name:.
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Inspection at:
Scriba, New York InsPection conducted:
April 24 lg80 Inspectors A. C. Cerne, R
to Inspector date signed R. A. Feil, Reactor Inspector date signed Approved by:
h/
JP~
R.
H. McGaughy C ', Construction Projects Section, RC8ES Branch date signed dat'e signed Ins ection Summar
Ins ection on A ril 24, 1980 Re or t No. 50-410/80-03
~A*
d:
',
p by gi
b d
inspectors consisting of an orientation tour of the site for the newly assigned inspector.
The inspection involved 6 inspector-hours onsite by two regional based inspectors.
Results:
No items of noncompliance were identified.
.
Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
'
~
~
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Nia ara Mohawk Power Cor oration S.
E. Cxuba, gA Engineer R. Dahlin, Construction Services J.
L. Dillon, gA Engineer R. L. Patch, gA Technician Stone
& Webster En ineerin Cor oration S&W C.
E. Gay, Superintendent, Field gC C.
E. Hilton, Superintendent, Construction J.
E. Rogers, Chief Office Engineer The inspectors conferred with other licensee and contractor personnel.
'2..
~Flic
The inspector toured the site facilities, observed work in progress and contacted various licensee and contractor personnel in the process of the turnover inspection.
Areas covered included the reactor building, primary containment, turbine building, administration building, water intake structure area, the area of the ground fault and other service areas.
The inspectors met with various licensee and contractor personnel to introduce the newly assigned inspector.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
3.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensees representatives (Paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on April 24, 1980.
The inspectors explained the purpose of the inspection.
The licensee acknowledged the inspectors comment '
I V