IR 05000397/1983030
| ML20024F353 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia |
| Issue date: | 07/15/1983 |
| From: | Dodds R, Willett D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20024F351 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-1.C.6, TASK-TM 50-397-83-30, NUDOCS 8309090306 | |
| Download: ML20024F353 (6) | |
Text
- ,
.
,
e..
.
.
-
,
c f.
.-
g
-
<
' '
"
,
.
.
.
L.
-
,
-
'
v
.U.' S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
<f
'
,
~
e
,
a
REGION V
-
y.
e
.
...,
Report:No.
50-397/83-30
,
'
Docket' No.
.50-397-l
-,
_
,,
. Lihense No.
CPPR'-93
,,3
~,
.L
'
-
- . Licensee:
Washington Public Power Supply System
.
P. O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Y
Facility Name:
Washington Nuclear Project No.2 (WNP-2)
Inspection at:
W/-2 Site, Benton County, Washington
"
. Inspection Conducted:
June 27 - July 1, 1983 Inspectors:
- AfEr b~
G.J.Willett/,ReactorInspector Date Signed Nh Approved by:
--
'
R. T. Dodds, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 1 Date Si/gned Reactor Projects Branch 1 Summary:
Inspection on June 27 - July 1, 1983 (Report No. 50-397/83-30)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the plant procedures, r
general plant operating procedures, system operating procedures, maintenance calibration program, security-personnel access, plant quality.. assurance surveillance,; corporate audits, calibration program, follow-up items, and independent inspection. The inspection involved 27 onsite hours-and 28 hours3.240741e-4 days <br />0.00778 hours <br />4.62963e-5 weeks <br />1.0654e-5 months <br /> of inoffice review by one NRC inspector.
Results: Of the' ten areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
,
k
+
4.
g t
4,
.A y&
t'
&
.,
g p
i a.
.
. -
,.
.,
'
8309090306 830718
'
PDR ADDCK 05000397 G
..,
x
-
.-
.
T
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
~*J. D. Martin, WNP-2 Plant Manager
- D. H. Walker, Quality Assurance Supervisor
- J. F. Peters, Plant Administrative Manager G. D. Bouchey, Manager, Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Programs T. S. Houchins, Manager, Audits and Surveillance J. W. Baker, Operations Manager, Unit 1 W. E. Taylor, Manager, Health and Safety Program R. R. Stickney, Manager, Generation Training The inspector also talked with other licensee personnel during the inspection. These included plant staff engineers, technic: ans, administrative assistants, and document control personnel.
- Denotes personnel present during the exit interview.
2.
Follow-up Items Letter to NRR/ Region V amending G. D. Bouchey letter to
A. Schwencer, subject: Confirmatory Issue No. 22, dated, May 23, 1983, has not yet been generated.
- The inspector reviewed the WNP action item control log with the plant administrator. The status and completeness were examined. No items were ready for close-out.
- The inspector reviewed the status of Bulletins and Circulars with the responsible engineer from the Safety-Engineering Group. There were no items ready for close-out.
- THI NUREG-0737, item IC6 - Redundant verification of components.
This item was. discussed with the individual responsible for generating the' Supply System's position for implementation.
It remains to be resolved.
.
3.
Security-Personnel Access.
The inspector reviewed procedures regarding personnel / visitor plant access. This review included' discussions with supervisors and personnel responsible for program management and implementation as well as witnessing processing of personnel through the-access point.
Thefollowinghrocedureswerereviewed:
. Plant Administrative Procedure 1.7.2
" Security Responsibility of WNP-2 Plant Employees" Security Force Procedures, SOP 5.9
" Federal, State and Local Officials"
2
.
.
Security Force Procedures, SOP 5.27
" Visitor Entrance Procedures"'
The inspector made the following observations:
The security force changes shift during the time of peak personnel traffic, security force personnel.are trying to monitor incoming and outgoing personnel through the same point at the same time.
Visitor access appears restricted since there was only one security
-
individual to monitor the egress, exit bottleneck, and one for vehicular gate traffic.
The inspector noted that each' day of his entrance onsite, a similar
'but different method was employed to verify. authorization /credent-ials and badging. The inspector noted that although there.were
. procedures available at the access, not one security force individual consulted them, but instead relaed on. questioning another security force member for.information, which was never quite the same.
,
I k%
)
'
4.
Maintenance - Calibration Program
-
,,
~
,'
.
,
,
The inspector reviewed the, calibration program. This' review included.
discussions with the plant maintenance manager,_the power generation manager responsible for the calibrati.on facility, and. other personnel responsible for program management.and. implementation. The computer instrument tracking / planning system, equipment history-files'and instrument storage were examined.
i
,
,
'
The inspector observed that the-l'aboratory facility ha'd controled areas for calibration of dimensional, electronic, pressure, and temperature instrumentation.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
-
5.
Procedures The~ inspector reviewed the plant procedures manual to verify that administrative controls have been established for the review, approval,
' and periodic updating of the following categories of procedures:
a.
Administrative - Volume 1 and 2. of the PPM.
b.
General Plant Operation - Volume 3.
c.
Startup, Shutdown, Operation of Safety-Related Systems -
Volume 2 Books 1, 2 and 3.
.d.
Correcting Abnormal, Off normal or alarm conditions -
Volume 4, Books 1, 2 and 3.
~
Combating Emergencies and Other Significant Events - T l
.
.
f.
Control of Radioactivity - Volume 11.
g.
Maintenance Volume 10, Books 1, 2, 3 and 4.
h.
Chemical and Radiochemical Activities - Volume 12, Books, 1, 2 and 3 i.
Refueling - Volume 6.
j.
Emergency Preparedness - Volume 13, Books 1 and 2.
k.
Surveillance Procedures - Volume 7, Books 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Responsibilities have been assigned in writing to assure procedures will be reviewed, updated, and approved (including 50.59 considerations).
Controls have been established for preparation of procedure (including format and content), issuing new and revised procedures, control and disposal of old procedures, and temporary procedure changes.
All changes to safety-related procedures will be reviewed by the Plant Operations Committee. Organizations such as Training and Operations will be promptly advised of any procedure changes affecting their departments.
Administrative controls have been established defining scope, review, responsibilities issue and distribution of standing and special orders.
These same controls provide for the preparation and correction of operating ~ logs, shift turnover activities, and log reviews.
6.
Operating Procedures The following administrative procedures were reviewed:
1.2.4 Plant Procedure Approval and Revision 1.3.1 Standing Orders 1.3.4 Operating Data and Logs 1.3.6 Shift Turnover A listing of plant operating procedures were compared with guidance contained in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, "QA Program Requirements (Operations)." The operating procedures reviewed were consistent with the general guidance contained in ANS 18.7,
" Administrative Controls and QA for Operational Phase Nuclear Power Plants."
The inspector reviewed and verified that the procedures were technically adequate to accomplish their intended purposes and that their format was as prescribed administratively.
7.
General Plant Operating Procedures j
'
,
,
e 4'
.
-s=
l
'
,
,
The following gensral plant ope'ating procedures were reviewed:
r
.
.
.
3.1.2 Reactor, Plant-Cold Startup
'
.
,
m.
.
'
3. 2.- 1 Normal Shutdown -to Cold Sh'utdown iv
.s
,
3.3.1 Reactor Scram-o
-
w.
~
n
..
.
.
_.
The inspector reviewed,and verifie'd that?the' procedures were technically
,
adequate to. accomplish thei'rfintended purposes"and that their format was as prescribed' administratively.
,
8.
Operating Procedure
.
The following operating procedures were reviewed:
2.1.4 Rod Worth Minimizer
.2.2.1 Reactor Recirculation System 2.2.6 Main Steam System 2.7.4 Uninterruptable Power Supply System The inspector reviewed and verified that the procedures were technically adequate to accomplish their intended purposes and that their format was
,
as prescribed' administratively.
9.
Plant Quality Assurance Surveillance / Corporate Audit Program i
The yearly and monthly (July 1983) surveillance schedules were reviewed and discussed with the plant quality assurance supervisor. The areas scheduled' for ' surveillance and the frequency of surveillance appeared.
. adequate.
It was observed that many surveillances. scheduled for startup preoperational tests are on hold waiting for testing to progress.
' '
The composite audit schedule for 1983 was reviewed with the manager of l
audits.
So' far in 1983, there have been audits of the system turnover process and the security plan. Fire protection, plant QA/QC, corporate nuclear safety review board, plant operations, and power generation
, inservice inspection programs are scheduled for the remainder ~of 1983.
.
No items'of noncompliance or deviations'were identified.
10.
Independent Inspection
,
?The inspector witnessed fuel undkeireassemblyontherefuelingfloor (606-foot elevation), channeling ofLthe bundles, and placement in their fuel storage racks.
,7 i '
>r,
.
.
The' inspector noted that personne1' radiation controls / practices, cleanliness controls, and security measures;were in effect.
,
,
'
-
- %
g
'%-
, -j-
-
.
No items of noncompliance'or deivations were identif,ied.
,
-
-
,
,
'
tj t
"
i h
'
'
f,
,-
/
4,
,,
4*
- ^
~h
^
,
_.....-
..__,,_
._.,.~.__._c,.__r__..
. _ _ _. _, _,.,,, - - -, _.,_,......,_
__
__
_
-
-
,
'
,
,
,
'
,
~
<
.
,
..
,
-
.
11.
Exit Interview
,
~
The inspector met with representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on July 1, 1983. The scope and findings of the inspection which were discussed during the exit interview are summarized in paragraphs 2 through 11 of this report.
l
.
Y
/
.
s s
-
m