IR 05000397/1983013
| ML20023C459 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 04/19/1983 |
| From: | Dodds R, Willett D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20023C456 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-1.B.1.2, TASK-1.C.6, TASK-TM 50-397-83-13, IEB-82-04, IEB-82-4, NUDOCS 8305170349 | |
| Download: ML20023C459 (3) | |
Text
--
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0!!r!ISSION
REGION V
Report No.
50-397/83-13 Docket No.
50-397 Licensee No.
CPPR-93 Licensee:
Washington Public Power Supply System P. O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Facility Name:
Washington Nuclear Project No.2 (WNP-2)
Inspection at:
WNP-2 Site, Benton County, Washington Inspection Conducted:
April 4-8, 1983 Y/
Inspector:
/
D. J. Willett, Reactor Inspector D6te' Signed Approved by:
5//f )
.
R. T. Dodds, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 1 Date / Signed Reactor Projects Branch No.1 Summary:
Inspection on April 4-8, 1983 (Report No. 50-397/83-13)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the preoperational t
test program, open items, IE Bulletin / Circular response, Tt!I (NUREG 0737)
'
activities, and independent inspection. The inspection involved j
28 onsite hours by one NRC inspector.
l Results: Of the five areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
I l
l l
l 8305170349 830419 PDR ADOCK 05000397 G
. _ _.
_
_
.
.
,
.
. _ _. _ _
, _ _ _
r
'
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted W. C. Bibb, Director of Power Generation R. B. Glasscock, Director, Licensing and Assurance J. D. Martin, WNP-2 Plant Manager
- G.
K. Afflerbach, Assistant Plant Manager
- H. M. Monopoli, Manager, Operational Assurance Programs
- D. H. Walker, Quality Assurance Supervisor
- J. F. Peters, Plant Administrative Engineer C. M. Powers, Supervisor, Reactor Engineering
- L.
J. Garvin, Manager, Quality Assurance S. Dennison, Safety Engineering Engineer
- R.
C. Mertens, Quality Assurance Engineer
- P. Grady, Bonneville Power Administration The inspector also talked with other licensee personnel during the inspection. These included plant staff engineers, technicians, administrative assistants, and document control personnel.
- Denotes personnel present during the exit interview.
2.
General The organization, structure and personnel responsible for the operation and administration of WNP-2 has not changed significantly from that previously reported.
The inspector reviewed the progress, proposed schedule, and status of the preoperational test program. This review centered on discussions with supervisory personnel responsible for program management and implementation.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (397/83-09-01, Closed) Fire Rating of Document Storage Vault:
?
j The licensee has identified and documented in Quality Assurance Surveillance Report No. 2-83-38 the need to qualify the record storage t
facility in the se.vice building as a " vault." The Supply System fire protection engineering staff has done an inspection and an evaluation of the facility. All single-copy, quality-related documents have been removed, or duplicated elsewhere, and will be retained in the WNP-2 plant vault located in Building No. 17 (as per memo to 0. R. Jordan from W. H. Jensen, dated March 18, 1983).
(81-04-02, closed) Independent Verification:
The issue of independent verification of valves / breakers postion in safety systems by a second person will be followed up in Item I.C.6 of TMI activities pertaining to NUREG-0737.
l
,
.
.
-.
_-
_-
_ _.
_
_
.
- -
.
,
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Bulletin and Circular Follow-up (IB-82-04, Closed) Deficiencies in Bunker Ramo Containment Electrical Penetrations:
WNP-2 utilizes only Westinghouse penetrations.
(IC-80-17, Closed) Fuel pin damage from water test impingement:
This Circular is not applicable to WNP-2.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
TMI Activities Inspection (NUREG-0737)
Item I.C.6 - Procedures for Verifying Correct Performance of Operating
'
Activities.
The requirements of NUREG-0737, Appendix B of the WNP-2 FSAR and the following administrative procedures were reviewed:
,
1.3.1 - Standing Orders 1.3.7 - Work Request 1.3.8 - Equipment Clearance and Tagging 1.3.9 - Control of Jumpers, Lifted Leads, and Test Box Devices None of these procedures addressed the qualifications of the second person
'
involved in dual verification, as per the guidance contained in NUREG-0737.
This item is considered open and will be inspected during a subsequent inspection.
Item I.B.I.2 - Independent Safety Engineering Group (ISEG)
i The requirements of NUREG-0737, Appendix B of the WNP-2 FSAR and the approved Quality Assurance Program were reviewed. Discrepancies between the FSAR, the Quality Assurance Program, and KUREG-0737, regarding the ISEG interface with the Quality Assurance Organization, staffing and location of ISEG staff, are being submitted for review and resolution as FSAR and Quality Assurance Program change requests.
This item is considered open and will be inspected during a subsequent inspection.
6.
Independent Inspection Recent information from the license regarding the high pressure core spray (HPCS) proposed preoperational test, indicates that, when the HPCS system is in the surveillance mode (condensate storage tank (CST) to CST)
and an injection signal occurs, low HPCS discharge pressure may exist while the test line closes as the injection line opens. Criterion 37 and 46 of Appendix A, 10 CFR 50, and Regulatory Guide 1.68 recommend that,to the extent practical, the plant conditions during the tests should
. _ - -,
. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ -,
-
. _ _._.
_ _, _ _ _.
. -.
~. _ _
-
.
,.
simulate the actual operating and emergency conditions to which the structure, system or component may be subjected.
This item will be followed up during a subsequent inspectica (83-13-01)
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Exit Interview The inspector met with representatives (deno'.ed in paragrap 1 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on April 8, 1983. She scope and findings of the inspection which were discussed during the exit inter.eu are summarized in paragraphs 2 through 6 of this report.
l
!
.
- .