IR 05000397/1978013

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Inspec Rept 50-397/78-13 on 781114-17 During Which No Items of Noncompliance Were Noted.Major Areas Inspected Incl:Operational Staffing & Plant Procedure Prepartion
ML17272A219
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 11/28/1978
From: Carlson J, Johnson P, Sternberg D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML17272A218 List:
References
50-397-78-13, NUDOCS 7812270382
Download: ML17272A219 (6)


Text

U. S.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COiPtISSIOH OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND EHFORCEHENT REGION V

Report No.

50-397/78-13 Docket Ho.

50-397 License No.

CPPR-93 Safeguards Group

Box 968 Richland, llashington 99352 Facility Name

..

Washington Nucl ear Project Ho.

(MHP-2).

nspection at.

~lHP-2 Site, Benton County, Mashington Inspection Conducted:

November 14-17, 1978 ji Inspectors:

P.

H. John on, Reactor Inspector g~J.

. Carlson, Reactor Inspector (( 2Y(7E Date Signed Date Signed Date Signe Approved By:

Surrmary:

D. H. Sternberg, Chief, Reactor Project Date Signed Section 1, Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Ins ection on November 14-17, 1978 (Re ort Ho. 50-397/78-13 Areas Ins ected:

Routine, unannounced inspection of operational staffing and p ant proce ure preparation.

The inspection involved 38 inspector hours onsite by two NRC inspectors.

In addition, approximately 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> were spent with the management plant tour and second corporate management meeting (see Report Ho. 50-397/78-12).

Results:

Ho deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.

gp(P~7o Qgp IE:Y Form 219 (2)

E i

I

DETAILS Persons Contacted i

  • D. L. Renberger, Assistant Director
  • J. R. Holder, Assistant Plant Superintendent, WNP-2
  • J. D. Martin, Startup and Operations Manager, WNP-2
  • D. L. Howard, Operational gA Manager, WNP-2
  • K. D. Cowan, Project Engineering Manager, WNP-2
  • A. D. Kohler, Project Manager, WNP-2
  • C. R. Edwards, Manager, Yendors and Audits
  • J. F. Peters, Supervisor, Startup Administration
  • S. Washington, Operational gA Engineer R. L. Concoran, Principal Operations Engineer

+Present at Exit Inter view.

0 erational Staffin The inspector reviewed the qualifications for a portion of the operational staff against ANSI N18.1 and Regulatory Guide 1.8.

Minimum education, experience or qualification requirements were verified.

Operational staffing will be reviewed further during future inspections.

No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.

Plant Procedures The inspectors reviewed the status of plant procedures preparation.,

Most of the plant's Administrative Procedures (AP's)

had been issued in approved form, and most system procedures had been prepared for review by the Plant Operations Committee (POC).

Preparation of other categories of plant procedures was in progress.

The applicant stated

'hat the operations division instruction which governs the prepara-tion and issue of initial procedures was being revised and would be provided for the inspectors'eview along with those AP's which have been issued to date.

Plant procedures will be reviewed further during future inspections.

No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.

Inde endent Ins ection The inspectors participated in the plant tour conducted by WPPSS management for the NRC Region Y director and his staff.

In addition,

'he inspectors toured the control room to gain familiarization with control cabinets and instrumentatio C4

~

-2-ho deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.

5.

Exit Interview The inspectors met with lJPPSS representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1)

on November 17, 1978.

The scope of the inspection was discussed as identified in Paragraphs 2,

3 and 4.

The Assistant Plant Superintendent (Hr. Holder) noted that the NRC audit of Operational gA is normally performed after the operating license (OL) has been issued and requested the NRC audit be performed six months prior to OL issuance for PJNP-2.

This request was based on a

MPPSS commitment to implement the Operational Ouality Assurance Pro-gram for preoperational testing versus the normal implementation of ninety (90) days prior to fuel loading.

The inspectors agreed to review the reques ~c

'~t