IR 05000364/1981002
| ML19350B001 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 02/10/1981 |
| From: | Gibson A, Troup G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19350A999 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-364-81-02, 50-364-81-2, NUDOCS 8103190057 | |
| Download: ML19350B001 (5) | |
Text
.-
' jo reg
<.9
'o UNITED STATES u/"
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
.. r REG lON 11 e
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 g*....
Report No. 30-364/81-02 Licensee: Alabama Power Company 600 North 18th Street Birmingham, AL 35202 Facility Name: Farley Unit 2 License No. NPF-8 Inspection at: Farley Nucipar plant nur Ashford, Alabama Inspected by:
b
---
-
7 / I '# ' i '
G -
Date Signed
- .g. L. Jropp q j Approved b
k L-
-[W5 /
A. F. Gibson, Section Chief FFMS Branch Date Signed Inspection on January 26-28, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 21 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of radiation protection and radioactive waste management including pre-operational testing; effluent control procedures; waste system modification and previously identified items.
Results Of the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
8103190 4 5 7
.
,
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
'J. D. Woodard, Assistant Plant Manager D. E. Mansfield, Startup Superintendent
- K. W. McCracken, Technical Services Superintendent
- C. D. Nesbitt, Chemistry and Health Physics Supervisor E. L. Stevenson, Startup Supervisor M: W. Mitchell, Health Physics Sector Supervisor B. P. Patton, ALARA Health Physicist W. G. Gripentog, C&HP Foreman
- J. W. Kale, Jr., SAER Engineer Other licensee employees contacted included 3 technicians.
Other Organizations:
,
.J. N. Charlton, lead Startup Engineer - Westinghouse L.' J. Lindstrom. Startup Engineer
- Westinghouse K. Schweikart, Startup Engineer
- Westinghouse NRC Resident Inspector
- W. H. Bradford
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 28, 1981 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above. The~ status of preccerational testing _ and the' milestones for completion of outstanding ~ tests were also discussed.
3.
' Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during.this inspection.
-
5.
Preoperational Test Procedures a.
Section 14.1 of the FSAR describes the preoperational testing program, including development' of the - test program per: Regulatory Guide 1.68, and review and appronti requirements. FSAR Section 14.-l.3 -lists the a
.
preoperational tests and synopses of the objectives, prerequisites, test methods and acceptance criteria.
b.
The inspector reviewed six completed preoperational test procedures.
The review included verification of proper review and approval of changes, review and approval of completed tests, identification and correction of deficiencies, or the appropriate approvals to accept deficiencies. Test procedures reviewed were:
1.
069-5-026, " Floor Drain Tank Preoperational Test" 2.
069-5-028, " Waste Monitor Tank and Demineralizer Preoperational Test" 3.
472-3-002, " Calibration and Functional Test for Gas Decay Tank Discharge to Plant Vent Valve 2-GWD-HCV-014" 4.
060-5-008,
" Containment Purge and Exhaust Ventilation Preoperational Test" 5.
060-5-009, " Containment Preaccess Ventilation Preoperational Test" 6.
070-5-002, " Spent Fuel Pool Ventilation Preoperational Test" c.
In RII Rpt. No 50-364/80-47, Paragraph 5.c., Open Item 80-47-01.was identified concerning the preoperational testing of two area radiation monitors.
The inspector reviewed Startup Work Requests 79.16 and 79.17, which completed the detector and actuation preoperational tests.
The inspector informed licensee management that, based on his review of the work request, he had no further questions and Open Item 80-47-01 was closed.
6.
necorders for Filter and Charcoal Systems-a.
In RII Rpt. No. 50-364/80-18, Paragraph 6, Open Item 80-18-02 was
.
identified concerning the installation of recorders in the Control Room
' for the. pressure ' drops across filters and charcoal absorbers.
Such recordecs-are recommended by Regulatory Guide 1.52, ' Section C.2.g.
Several sections of the FSAR concerning atmospheric cleanup systems had stated that - the systems were ;in accordance with the Reg. Guide-concerning'this item. However, no recorders had been. installed.
b.
Amendment 75 to the FSAR revised the tables dealing with the comparison of atmospheric cleanup systems.with Regulatory Guide 1.52, such as -
Table 6.2-13A for the Penetration Room Filtration System and Table 9.4-2A for the Control Room Filtration System.
The revision states that pressure' drop instrumentation is provided but recorders will not be'used. The inspector reviewed the revisions; he informed _ licensee management that he had no further questions and that Open Item 80-18-02 was closed.
u
.
.
.
7.
Radioactive Waste Systams Modifications a.
The licensee formerly used contracted services to solidify wastes using urea formaldehyde. The licensee has changed contractors and began using a cement solidification system.
The solidification system was placed in operation for Unit 1 in December, 1980 and also will be used for Unit 2 wastes.
b.
The inspector reviewed plant records and correspondence and determined that:
(1). A safety review of the change had been performed in accordance with 10CFR50.59(a)(1).
(2). The determination that the change did not constitute an unreviewed safety question had been reviewed by the Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC) and approved by the Plant Manager.
(3). The evaluation and system modification were reported in the Unit 1 Monthly Operating Report for December,1980.
(4). The revised Process Control Program was submitted to the NRC on December 3, 1980 as required by Section 2.c.8 of the Unit 2 operating license.
The inspector informed licensee management that he had no further questions on the documentation and approval of the change in the solidification system.
-c.
A licensee representative informed the inspector that another modi-fication was being made to the Unit 2 radioactive waste system to install a supplemental demineralizer system.
The inspector observed the installation of the system and discussed the -installation and operation with licensee representatives.
A licensee representative stated that the safety. review had been prepared but had not been submitted to PORC for review; he further stated that the required reviews and reports would be completed prior to placing the system in service. The inspector stated that these documents would be reviewed at a later date.
8.
. Effluent Control Procedures (80-44-01)
The : inspector discussed the status of effluent control ' procedures with licensee representatives. A representative stated that the three procedures had been revised.but not issued because of a difference in the Technical-Specifications between Unit 1 and Unit 2.
The existing procedure, FNP_-0-RCP-175, " Schedule Effluent Monitoring and Counting Room Activities"
-was ' written based on the Unit I requirements.
It is being revised to a FNP-1-RCP-XXX procedure and a new procedure wil1 ~ be issued as FNP-2-RCP-XXX.
The other procedures are being held until the controlling procedures are
,
a
.y'
.
..
'
revised. The inspector informed licensee management that Open Item 80-44-01 would remain open pending issue of these procedures.
.
N