IR 05000358/1980012
| ML19321A830 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1980 |
| From: | Daniels F, Tambling T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19321A817 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-358-80-12, NUDOCS 8007240253 | |
| Download: ML19321A830 (5) | |
Text
.
.
g
U.S. N11 CLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-358/80-12 Docket No. 50-358 License No. DPPR-88 Licensee: Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company 139 East 4th Street Cincinnati, OH 45201 Facility Name:
W. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station Inspection At:
W. H. Zimmer Site, Moscow, OH Inspection Conducted: May 1, 2, 5-9, 12-16, 19-23, 27-30, 1980 t
AJ.
t
% S"-
b,\\ b (, Tfd Inspector:
F. T. Daniels T. d. T c - -- - -- - I
,
Approved By:
T. N. Tambling, Acting Chi lo I (o 8~o Projects Section 2 Inspection Summary Insgection on May 1, 2, 5-9, 12-16, 19-23, 27-30, 1980 (Report No. 50-358/80-12)
Areas Inspected: Routine announced inspection of unresolved items from previous inspections, Bulletin and Circular followup, plant tours, preop-erational test program implementation controls, and preoperational test procedure review. This inspection involved 118 inspector man-hours by the NRC Senior Resident Inspector.
Results:
Of the five areas inspected, four were found satisfactory and a noncompliance was identified during one of the plant tours.
(Infraction-10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XIII - Failure to control cleanliness of cable trays.)
80o2240253:
t
.
__
_ _ _
.
.
DETAILS
,
1.
Personnel Contacted
- J.
Schott, Plant Superintendent
- P. King, Assistant Plant Superintendent W. Schwiers, Quality Assurance Manager B. Ehas, Electrical QA&S Engineer J. Wald, Quality Assurance Engineer S. Martin, Test Coordinator G. Meyers, Turnover Coordinator B. Culver, Construction Manager and others of the station staff
- Denotes personnel attending monthly exit meeting.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item 80-04-03, SA. SAD.01:
Station Administra-tive Directives, revision 6 allows use of management memos to revise procedures. The inspector verified that the newest revision eliminated the section on the use of management memos to revise procedures.
(0 pen) Unresolved Item 78-11-01: Reactor Engineer does not meet minimum requirements as stated in FSAR and ANSI 18.1.
The inspector reviewed the training record of the Nuclear Engineer and found at this time he still does not meet the minimum requirements.
(Closed) Unresolved Item 79-16-01:
OP.RT.01, Reactor Water Cleanup procedure required revision to incorporate inspectors' comments. The inspector reviewed the newest revision of procedure and found all previous concerns were incorporated.
3.
Bulletin and Circular Followup (Closed) IE Bulletin 78-01: The inspector reviewed licensee response to the bulletin letters from licensee to G.E. (for NSSS equipment)
and S&L (for B0P equipment) and the responses to those letters.
Only six CRIZOA relays were used in the plant and they were in the two RPS motor generator sets (panel C71-S001). These were replaced under FDDR KN-1-554 and no spare CRIZOA relays were supplied.
(Closed) IE Circular 79-19: The inspector verified that none of the referenced types of Deep Draft Ingersoll-Rand Pumps were installed at W. H. Zimmer and that action was taken to verify the impeller m
locking devices were not loose on the type used.
-2-E
_-
~
.
.
(Closed) lE Circular 79-24: The inspector verified the core spray
.
pipe break detection equipment was installed properly and that the setpoint had been changed to 0.5 psid as per FDDR No. KN-1-855.
(Closed) IE Bulletin 80-02: The inspector reviewed the correspondence between the licensee and General Electric which verified that none of the Wm. H. Zimmer Feedwater Spargers and thermal sleeves were supplied by Marvin Engineering Company.
4.
Plant Tours The following items were observed during the frequent tours conducted by the NRC Senior Resident Inspector. All items were acknowledged by the licensee.
a.
Cables not supported in cable risers R4008 and RK1009
b.
Cables PT 061 and LD 080 not supported in cable riser R 1033.
c.
Cable WS 714 nat supported in cable riser RK 3057.
d.
Miscellaneous material (fan, rag, pail and metal box) found in 1A and 1B battery rooms.
e.
As a result of a tour made on May 7, 1980, the following material was observed in the cable trays through-out the Reactor Building and Cable Spreading Room.
. Light bulbs *
. Paper Towels
. Pipe *
. Wooden Boards
. Pop Bottles *
. Pop Cans *
. Empty Die Penetrant Cans
. Hanger Support piece *
. Sawdust
. Concrete *
. Vacuum Cleaner Hose
<
-3-J
.
.
.
. Wire Brush *
'
.
. Goggles
. Magazines
. Face Shield
. Safety Related Cable Tagging Material
. Cable Tie Wraps
. Apple Cores
. Rags
'
The items marked with an asterisk are material which will cause damage to safety-related cables, therefore, they are considered to be in noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XIII, and Section 17.1.13.2 of the FSAR, which in part states that measures will be established to control the cleaning and preservation of installed material and equipment to prevent damage or deterioration.
(50-358/80-12-01)
f.
Jumper and lifted wire tag #79137-1 and 2 were not signed in the authorization, hung by, and date/ time blanks.
g.
Protective cover on MSK-451 was not properly attached to end of pipe.
5.
Preoperational Test Program Implementation Controls The inspector verified by reviewing the HPCS and LPCS turnover a.
packages, turnover logs, records and drawings that jusisdictional controls were observed prior to and subsequent to testing. Upon visually spot-checking portions of the HPCS, LPCS and RHR sys-tems for green tagging as required by SU.ACP.15, Tagging of Systems Turned Over for Preoperational Testing, revision 2, December 28, 1978, it was noted some tags were ripped in half and three were missing. This item was discussed with appropri-ate personnel and it was agreed to increase the surveillance of green tagging. The inspector will verify in subsequent inspec-tious that the increased surveillance is adequate. -This is con-sidered an unresolved item and will be reinspected on subsequent inspections (50-358/80-12-02).
b.
The inspector witnessed the collection and analysis of a water sample from the Reactor Vessel and verified the procedures end techniques used for the analysis to be technically adequate.
[
l-4-
-
..
.
.
$
c.
The inspector witnessed the rotating of the shafts and checking of oil levels in the LPCS and RHR "A" pumps and the quarterly maintenance performed on the
"A" 250VDC batter. He verified that the personnel performing the maintenance activity were qualified and the activity was recorded in the equipmeat history files.
No items of noncompliance or deviation were noted.
6.
Preoperational Test Procedure Review a.
The inspector reviewed the high pressure core spray preoperational test procedure for the following:
(1) Management review and approval.
(2) Acceptance criteria clearly identified.
(3) Initial test conditions are specified.
(4) Step-by-step instructions for the performance of the procedure are complete to the extent necessary to assure that test objectives are met.
,
(5) Provisions are available for documenting that all items, including prerequisites, are verified as having been pe rfo rmed.
(6) Procedure requires that temporary connections, disconnec-tions or jumpers be restored to normal.
b.
Findinge are as follows:
Wm. H. Zimmer, FSAR, Table 14.1-14 states under safety precau-tions, number 2: " Verify all safety and construction tags have been removed from all equipment to be operated."
The inspector was unable to find such a signoff in the procedure.
This is considered an unresolved item and will be reviewed on subsequent inspections. (50-358/80-12-03)
No items of noncompliance or deviation were noted.
7.
Monthly Exit Meeting The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on May 30, 1980. The inspector summarized the scope and the findings of the inspection. With regard to unresolved item (50-358/80-12-02), Mr. J. Schott, Station Superin-tendent, agreed to increase the surveillance of the green tags on systems turned over for operational control. With regard to unresolved item (50-358/80-12-03), Mr. Schott, agreed to review this on a generic basis for all preoperational tests.
-5-