IR 05000358/1980011
| ML19323J079 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 05/05/1980 |
| From: | Baker K, Branch M, Forney W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19323J073 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-358-80-11, NUDOCS 8006170749 | |
| Download: ML19323J079 (3) | |
Text
,
_
_
- - _ - _. _ _ _ _
' \\_,] '
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
. Report No. 50-358/80-11 Docket No. 50-358 License No. CPPR-88 Licensee:
Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company 139 East 4th Street Cincinnati, OH 45201 Facility Name:
W. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station Inspection At:
W. H. Zimmer Site, Moscow, OH Inspection Conducted: April 15-17, 1980 Inspectors:
.'ornIy 6M T
dfda$
.d5/n p
T.v Approved By:
K. R. Baker, Chief e6 6/W Reactor Operations Section 3-2
'
Inspection Summary Inspection on April 15-17, 1980 (Report No. 50-358/80-11)
Areas Inspected: Routine unannounced inspection of the licensee's de-velopment of a Fire Protection / Prevention Program for operations. The inspection involved 57 hours6.597222e-4 days <br />0.0158 hours <br />9.424603e-5 weeks <br />2.16885e-5 months <br /> onsite by three NRC inspectors.
Results: No items of noncompliance were identified in the area inspected.
.
800617 0 $$
j
.
. _ _. _
-.__
_ _ _ _ _
-_
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- J. Schott, Station Superintendent
- P. King, Assistant Station Superintendent
- J. Wold, Station Quality Engineer
.
- D. Outcalt, Fire Protection Engineer
- B. Ehas, QA & S Engineer
'
- Denotes those present at exit interview.
2.
Fire Protection / Prevention Program Administrative procedures were reviewed by inspectors to a.
ascertain whether the applicant is developing a program for fire protection and prevention that is in conformance with regulatory requirements, commitments in the application and industry guides and standards.
i The inspectors determined by review of proposed administrative procedures FP-SAD.01, FP-SAD.02, FP-SAD.03, OP-EPP-07, TR-SAD-02, OS-SAD-01; Technical Specification (Proof and Review Copy) that the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.120, Revision 1 (for comment) and Branch Technical Position 9.5-1 are not met in the following areas:
'1)
combustible / flammable material handling and storage 2)
off-site fire personnel activities 3)
contractor personnel indoctrination and controls The licensee appears to be committed to the development of a program in accorda.nce with the Branch Technical Position. The licensee has made 'rua specific commitments to R.G.1.120 though much of it is parallel to the Branch Technical Position. Due to the extended time interval between the inspection and scheduled operational date for the facility it is possible that the specific commitments will be changed. Therefore, this is considered an unresolved item (50-358/80-11-01) until re-inspected to the specific requirements that the operating
. licensee will be based upon.
'
b.
Administrative controls of combustible material in the New Fuel Storage area was reviewed by the inspectors to ascertain whet-her the licensee procedures for implementing a program for fire protection / prevention is in accordance with License No. SNM-1823.
The inspectors determined by review of licensee's administra-tive procedures EC-SAD-05 (work authorization) thst the proce-l-2-l
-
i
,-
_
._.
_-_
,
L
.
'
dures did not contain controls to prevent storage and/or accumu-lation of transient combustible materials on the refueling floor, as stated in the application for SNM license number SNM-1823.
This matter is considered unresolved item 50-358/80-11-02.
3.
Unresolved Items
.
.
Unresolved items are matters about which more information is requir-ed in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance, or deviations. Unresolved items disclosed during the-inspection are discussed in Paragraphs 2.a, and 2.b.
4.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in Para-graph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on April 17, 1980. The
]
inspectors summarized the purpose and scope of the inspection and the findings. With regard to unresolved item 50-358/80-11-01, Mr. J. Schott, Station Superintendent, agreed to review their admin-istrative procedures and issue procedures and/or changes as required.
With regard to unresolved item 50-358/80-11-02, Mr. Schott agreed to take immediate action to provide the administrative control proce-dures.
-3-
)