IR 05000352/1990014
| ML20042F137 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 04/24/1990 |
| From: | Conte R, Florek D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20042F135 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-352-90-14OL, 50-353-90-13OL, NUDOCS 9005070262 | |
| Download: ML20042F137 (6) | |
Text
.
,
,
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APR 2 61990
-
REGION I
'
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION REQUALIFICATION EXAMINATION Combined Report No.
50-352/90-14 (OL) and 50-353/90-13 (OL)
Facility Docket No.
50-352 and 50-353 Facility Licence No.
!
License:
Philadelphia Electric Company P.O. Box 7520 Philadelphia, Pa. 19101 Facility:
Limerick Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Examination Date:
April 6, 1990 Requalification Re-examination Chief Exami er:
Su' /
41790 Otinal
. Florek, Sr. Operations Engineer
.? pat /
Reviewed By:
h f/
T<ichard J. Contf/ Chief, BWR Section Date Operations Brann, DRS EXAMINATION SUMMARY:
Examination on April 6,1990 Examination Report 50-352/90-14 (OL) and 50-353/90-13 (OL)
l Written requalification re-examinations were administered to one' Reactor Operator (RO) and one Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) who had failed this
!
l-portion of the requalification examination administered during the week of l
January 29, 1990. Both operators passed the examinations._Since only two
'
operators were examined, this review did not constitute a program evaluation.
The facility licensee was effective in remediating the operators with respect to their previous examination results.
However, the examiner noted that the facility submitted examination tended to concentrate'on a few topics covered during the requalification program. As a result, during the preparation of the examination the examiner substituted i
approximately 20% of the questions to broaden the scope of the written examina-
.
tion. The examiner used the sampling plan to select other questions from the l
facility examination bank. The licensee effectively incorporated the examiner's comments on the written examination.
9003070262 900426
^
PDR ADOCK 05000352 V
..
.,
DETAILS 1. Introduction Written examinations were administered to one RO and one SRO. The operators had failed the written portion of the requalification examination administered during the week of January 29, 1990. The examiner used the process described in NVREG 1021, " Operator Licensing Examiner Standard," Rev. 5, section ES-601, " Administration of NRC Requalification Program Evaluations." 1he personnel contacted during the examination are listed in Attachment 1.
2. Examination Results The following is a summary of the individual examination NRC results:
TYPE OF EXAMINATION:
Requalification INRC l
R0 l
SRO TOTAL, IGrading l
Pass / Fail l
Pass / Fail Pass / Fail!
l l
l ll l
l l
l l
l IWritten I 1/0 l
1/0 l
2/0 l
I L
I I
I I
I I
ISimulatori N/A I
N/A I
N/A I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
IWalk l
l l
l IThrough l N/A l
N/A l
N/A L
l l
I l
l l
l l
l 10vera11 l
1/0 l
1/0
2/0 ll l
l
.I, I
I
,
No generic strengths and weaknesses were noted.
3. Requalification Examination Preparation The facility submitted a proposed examination in a letter dated March 2, 1990. The examination as proposed tended to concentrate on too few requalification program topics.
The NRC reviewed t'ne written examination
_i with the facility on March 29, 1990 and substituted approximately 20% of l
the questions from the facility examination bank to broaden the scope of the examination. The examiner utilized the facility generated examination
sampling plan to select questions to address additional topics covered during the requalification period. After modification the written examina-tion sampled a good cross section of the information covered during the requalification year. A summary of the examination administered is contained in Attachment '
.
,
.
-
,
,
4. Exit Meeting An exit meeting was held at the conclusion of the examination on April 6, 1990. The personnel in attendance are listed in Attachment 1.
The NRC preliminary results of the examinations were presented.
Requalification Examination preparation and administration were discussed as indicated in this report.
ATTACHMENTS 1. Persons contacted 2. Written re-examination test items
,
i Y
i
,
'..
.,.
.
.
h
!'I ATTACHMENT 1
!
Persons Contacted i
!
Ph11adelphia' Electric Company
,
J. Armstrong, Assistant Superintendent Operation-
.
i
- M. Baughman, Lead Requalification Instructor-
- V. Cwietniewicz, Training Superintendent
!
- R. Nunez, Supervisor Operations. Training
.j i
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- f
- D. Florek, Senior Operations Engineer f
!
- Denotes those present at exit meeting on April 6, 1990
,
.tia
I
'l I
e
-!
' i i
I
~t t
1
+
D r
'.?
E j.
-
-
'i L
_-#,
. - - - - -,... - - - - -
. -....
.
,.
. - -. - -.
m
- -.,..-. __,
. -.-- -
,,,-. -.,..--, - -.
.
7;
- .
....
-
,-
ATTACHMENT 2 WRITTEN RE-EXAMINATION TEST ITEMS.
Written. Examination
.Part B Open Reference Examination Nos. 90-RO-8 and-
'
90-SRO-8
. TEST ITEM 90-SRO-8
- 90-RO-8 1-1.0
-
1.5
-
1.0
-
2.0 2.0 5.-
1.0 1.0
2.0 2.0
1.5 1.5
1.0
,-
1.0 1. 0.
1.5 1.5
1.5
-
1.0
-
2.0
-
1.0
-
2.0
-
16.
1.0
-
1.0.
-
1.25
-
10
-
.
1.0
-
1.5
-
1.0 TOTAL 19.0 T83
TE N. '* b
.-
,
il-ATTACHMENT 2 Continued WRITTEN RE-EXAMINATION TEST ITEMS Written Examination - Part A Static Simulator Examination No.28 50% power, APRM fails downscale, ESW valve misoperation with diesel generator operation TEST ITEM SRO QVAL RO QVAL
' 1. 0 -
1.0
1.0
-
1.0 1.0 4-1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
-
. TOTAL 1G
Staticdimulator Examination No 03. ' Steam leak inside drywell, RCIC isolation, and electrical load center fault TEST ITEM SRO QVAL RO QVAL-
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
-
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
-
TOTAL ID ID