IR 05000335/1988001
| ML17221A669 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 02/29/1988 |
| From: | Bibb H, Crlenjak R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17221A668 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-335-88-01, 50-335-88-1, 50-389-88-01, 50-389-88-1, NUDOCS 8803170060 | |
| Download: ML17221A669 (8) | |
Text
~p,4 4EOII)
Wp0 Cy y4 n W~*y4 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323 Report Nos.:
50-335/88-01 and 50-389/88-01 Licensee:
Florida Power and Light Company 9250 West Flagler Street Miami, FL 33102 Docket Nos.:
50-335 and 50-389 License Nos.:
DPR-67 and NPF-16 Facility Name:
St.
Lucie 1 and
\\
Inspection Conducted:
anuary 3 - February 6,
1988 Inspector:
H E. Bibb, Resident In pector Approved by:
R.
V.
Cr lenjak, Sectio Chief Division of Reactor Projects
'Date Signed ate igned SUMMARY Scope:
This inspection involved on site activities in the areas of Technical Specification compliance, operator performance, over'all plant operations, quality assurance practices, station and corporate management practices, corrective and preventive maintenance activities, site security procedures, radiation control activities, and surveillance activities.
Result's: 'f the areas inspection, no violations or deviations were identified.
8803l70060 880302 PDR ADOCK 05000335
REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees K. Harris, St.
Lucie Site Vice President
- G. Boissy, Plant Manager
'R. Sipos, Services Manager
- J. Barrow, Operations Superintendent T. Diliard, Maintenance Superintendent J. Harper, QA Superintendent C. Burton, Operations Supervisor F. Frechette, Chemistry Supervisor
"C. Leppla, I 5 C-Supervisor
- C. Pell, Technical Staff Supervisor
- E. Wunderlich, Reactor Engineering Supervisor
- H. Buchanan, Health Physics Supervisor
- W. White, Security Supervisor B. Sculthorpe, Reliability and support Supervisor (Acting)
J.
Barrow, Fire Prevention Coordinator R.
Dawson, Assistant Plant Superintendent
- Electrical C. Wilson, Assistant Plant Superintendent
- Mechanical N.
Roos, Quality Control Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators, mechanics, security force members, and office personnel.
"Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on February 12, 1988, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
Plant Tours (Units 1 and 2) (71710)
The inspector conducted plant tours periodically during the inspection-interval to verify that monitoring equipment was recording as required, equipment was properly tagged, operations personnel were aware of plant conditions, and plant housekeeping efforts were adequate.
The inspector also determined that appropriate radiation controls were properly established, critical clean areas were being controlled in accordance with procedures, excess equipment or material was stored properly and combustible materials and debris were disposed of expeditiously.
During tours, the inspector looked for the existence of unusual fluid leaks,
piping vibrations, pipe hanger and seismic restraint settings, various valve and bleaker positions, equipment caution and danger tags, component positions, adequacy of fire fighting equipment, and instrument calibration dates.
Some tours were conducted on backshifts.
The inspector routinely conducted partial walkdowns of Emergency Core Cooling (ECCS)
systems.
Valve, breaker/switch lineups and equipment conditions were randomly verified both locally and in the control room.
During the inspection period, the inspectors conducted a complete walkdown in the accessible area of the Unit
and
Emergency Diesel Generator, Auxiliary Feedwater, and AC and DC electrical systems to verify that the lineups were in accordance with licensee requirements for operability and equipment material conditions were satisfactory.
Additionally, flowpath
,verifications were performed on the following systems:
Unit 1 and 2 Main Feedwater, Eme'rgency Diesel Generator Air Start and Fuel Oil Supply, and Chemical and Volume Control.
No violations or deviations were identified.
Plant Operations Review (Units 1 and 2) (71707)
The inspector, periodically during the inspection interval, reviewed shift logs and operations records, including data sheets, instrument traces, and records of equipment malfunctions.
This review included control room logs and auxiliary logs, operating orders, standing orders, jumper logs and equipment tagout records.
The inspector routinely observed operator alertness and demeanor during plant tours.
During routine operations, operator performance and response actions were observed and evaluated.
The inspector conducted random off-hours inspections during the reporting interval to assure that operations and security remained at an acceptable level.
Shift turnovers were observed to verify that they were conducted in accordance with approved licensee procedures.
The inspector performed an in-depth review of the following safety-related tagouts (clearances):
UNIT 1 1-2"1 1-2-2 1-2-8 1-2-10 1-2-12 UNIT 2 1A DC Battery Charger PM [Preventive Maintenance]
1B Charging Pump - Accumulator PM Condensate Storage Tank Transfer Pump -
PM 1A Spent Fuel Pool Pump PM Spent Fuel Machine PM 2-1-79 2-2-1 2-12-118 Fuel Handling Building L-shaped Door Drive Motor replace drive chain V-5302 - Pressurizer Steam Space Sample Valve replace 2B Charging Pump - accumulator PM No violations or deviations were identifie Technical Specification Compliance (Units 1 and 2) (71707)
During thi s reporting inter val, the inspector verified compliance with limiting conditions for operations (LCO')
and results of selected sur veil lance tests.
These verifications were accomplished by direct observation of monitoring instrumentation, valve positions, switch positions, and review of completed logs and records.
The licensee's compliance with LCO action statements were reviewed on selected occurrences as they happened.
No violations or deviations were identified.
Maintenance Observation (62703)
Station maintenance activities of selected safety-related systems and components were observed/reviewed to ascertain that they were conducted in accordance with requirements.
The following items were considered during this review; limiting conditions for operations were met, activities were accomplished using approved procedures, functional tests and/or calibrations were performed prior to returning components or systems to service; quality control records were maintained; activities were accomplished by qualified personnel; parts and materials used were properly certified; and radiological controls were implemented as required.
Work requests were reviewed to determine status of outstanding jobs and to assure the priority was assigned to safety-related equipment.
The inspector ob'served portions of the following maintenance activities.
UNIT
Plant Work Order (PWO) No.
6559 6561 6585 gSPDS Display Monitor - loss of indication Pressurizer Pressure Transmitter - high indication Temperature Indicator Alarm for Pressurizer Spray Line UNIT 2 6858 6985 V2516 Limit Switch - no open indication SE-05-1A, Safety Injection Tank 2A1 Sample Valve - dual position indication 7255 Reactor Protection System quarterly Surveillance No violations or deviations were identified.
Physical Protection (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector verified by observation and interviews during the reporting interval that measures taken to assure the physical protection of the facility met current requirements.
Areas inspected included the
organization of the security force, the establishment and maintenance of gates, doors and isolation zones in the proper conditions, that access control and badging was proper, and procedures were followed.
During the inspection period, the licensee held their first random drug sampling of contractor employees.
A total of 28 people were tested, and at the end of the inspection period the results had not been analyzed.
No violations or deviations were identified.
Surveillance Observations (61726)
During the inspection period, the inspector verified plant operations were in compliance with selected technical specifications (TS) requirements.
Typical of these were confirmation of compliance with the TS for reactor coolant chemistry, refueling water tank, containment pressure, control room ventilation and AC and DC electrical sources.
The inspector verified that testing was performed in accordance with adequate procedures, test instrumentation was calibrated, limiting conditions for operations were met, removal and restoration of the affected components were accomplished, test results met requirements and were reviewed by personnel other than the individual directing the test, and that any deficiencies identified during the testing were properly reviewed and resolved by appropriate management personnel.
The
.inspector observed the following surveillance( s):
UNIT
HP 4.3 HP 4.7 HP 13M1 HP 32 HP 45 AP 1-0010123 OP 1-0030151 Health Physics Monthly Checkoff Sheet Health Physics Administration Checkoff Sheet Calibration Check'f Containment High Range Radiation Monitors Source and Drift Check - Direct Reading Dosimeters Portal Monitor and Frisker Weekly Response Check Locked Yalve Deviation Log Appendix C
Remote Shutdown Instrumentation - Periodic Channel Check UNIT 2 2-0110050 AP 0010124 AP 20010125 AP 2-0010125 Control Element Assembly Periodic Exercise Jumper/Lifted. Lead Request Log Index Figure
Survei llances Performed Daily Check Sheet
Monthly Pump Code Run - 2A boric Acid Pump Data Sheet
No violations or deviations were identified.
Independent Safety Engineering Group (ISEG) (36701)
During the inspection period, the inspector conducted a routine inspection of the ISEG to assure compliance with the administrati.ve controls established in Unit 2 Technical Specification paragraph 6.2.3.
Examined
in particular were the number and qual ifications of the ISEG staff members, a
review of several monthly reports to assure frequency and program content were in compliance, and review of the ISEG charter and organization chart to assure independence from on-site influence.
All portions of the inspection were found to meet the regulatory requirements.
No violations or deviations were identifie ll