IR 05000333/1993006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-333/93-06
ML20045F143
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/30/1993
From: Cowgill C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Harry Salmon
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
References
NUDOCS 9307070030
Download: ML20045F143 (3)


Text

June 14, 1993

SUBJECT:

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant

-

'

Docket No. 50-333 Reply and Answer to Notice of Violation NRC Inspection Report 50-333/93-06

Dear Sir:

This letter provides the Authority's reply to the Notice of Violation in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201. The reasons for the violations, the corrective

,

actions that have been taken and the results achieved, the corrective actions to be taken to avoid further violations and the date when full compliance will be' achieved l

for the violations is included in Attachment 1.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mike Colomb.

'

Very truly yours, A

bb f'

' Harry P.' Salmon, Jr. "

,

STATE OF NEW YORK

'

COUNTY OF OSWEGO Subscribed and sworn to before me thisl 4'" day of Lt R95 TAMMY L DANN 4985563 Notary Pubhe. State of New York Quahfied in Oswego Coun omtnission ires 8/191 ts W s

Notary P0blic cc: see next page Cu gqi

.

P

.

- a

.

'

-

- cc:

Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

.

. Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Office of the Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 136 i

Lycoming, NY 13093 Mr. Brain C. McCabe Project Directorate I-11 Division of Reactor Projects-1/II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 14 B2 Washington, DC 20555

f

.-.

.

t

)

.

._

-

.

.

.

.

'

~

Response to Notice of Violation e

.

-

Attachment 1 Violation

A.

Technical Specification 6.8.A states, in part, that written procedures shall be implemented that meet or exceed the requirements of Section 5 " Facility

Administrative Policies and Procedures" of ANSI 18.7 - 1972.

ANSI 18.7 - 1972, Section 5.1.2 states, in part, that procecures snail be

,

followed.

Modification M1-91-004, " Chemical Decontamination - Addition of Permanent Piping and Valve", Installation Procedure No.1, Section 10.0, " Post-installation / Pre-operational Testing", specifies in paragraph 10.1 that all socket i

type welded fittings that were installed on the 1" diameter branch lines on the

,

recirculation system piping risers will be verified leak-tight during reactor

vessel operational pressure testing per surveillance test procedure ST-39H.

i Contrary to the above, on September 30,1992, ST-39H was performed, but l

the manual isolation valves in the ten recirculation riser decontamination connections were not opened to allow pressurization and leak testing of the i

piping and welds downstream of the manual isolation valves.

!

!

This is a Severity Level IV Violation.

,

l Admission or Denial of the Alleged Violation i

The Authority agrees with this violation.

!

The Reason for the Violation i

Personnel error is the primary cause that modification package M1-91-

004, " Chemical Decontamination - Addition of Permanent Piping and Valves", was not clear as to the intended testing requirements. The intent of the responsible engineer was not to leak test the' connections I

downstream of the manual isolation valves. This was not clearly communicated in the modification package or the installation procedure.

The installation procedure specified that "all socket type 1 of 3

.

v-m.

m

-

ww

-- _,_. -

..

.

-

,

,

.

.

i

,'

welded fittings" that were installed on the 1" diameter branch lines at the recirculation system piping would be verified leak-tight. The i

.

procedure should have stated " perform an in-service leak test of the assembly at full system operating pressure with normal valve lineup during ST-390, i.e., new valves closed". This was the responsible l

engineers intent, based on plant procedure and the testing performed.

,

'

Corrective Steps to be Taken to Avoid Further Violation A root cause analysis has been performed on Modification M1-91-004 to

!

identify the cause and corrective action of this violation. The corrective action for this violation includes the following:

1.

To have the root cause analysis reviewed by the Engineers involved in the modification process.

2.

To review the need for attention to detail with engineers in f

defining modification test requirements.

i 3.

The modification package has been revised to clarify the testing

requirements.

'

The Date When Full Comoliance Will be Achiev(d Full compliance will be achieved by August 1,1993.

Violation i

f B.

10CFR50.9 requires, in part, that information provided to the Commission by

'

a licensee be complete and accurate in all material respects.

Contrary to the above, NYPA provided inaccurate information to the NRC by i

letter dated March 12, 1993, transmitting Licensee Event Report 93-006,

.

Inoperability of Fire Pumps. The sequence of events, when the electric driven and diesel driven fire pumps were declared inoperab!e, were in error and in

,

conflict with the February 26,1993 Emergency Notification System i

chronology and a facsimile transmission made by NYPA, on March 1,1993, concerning this event.

,

i 2 of 3

-

i I

- -.

.

.

.

.

_

-

.

,

,

,

,

.

.

.

.

..

.-

.

'

^

, '.

Admissier Denial of the Alleged Violatiqn The Authority agrees with the violation.

The Reasons for the Violation

,

Personnel error is the primary cause for the inaccurate information contained in LER-93-006. An error was made by not incorporating the correct

'

chronological data from the operations logs to the LER. The data omitted was the entry made for declaring the pump inoperable.

The Corrective Steos Taken to Avoid Further Violations A new procedure, AP-03.04, Information Reporting Requirements was implemented on May 15, 1993. This procedure contains a technical review

- t checklist for LERs. This checklist will be used by the technical reviewer-

.,

(assigned by the Department Manager (s) responsible for providing the

description of the event) to ensure technical accuracy. The technical review

'

checklist includes verifying the appropriate times of the occurrences during the event. A revised LER was issued on May 5,1993, to correct the inaccurate information contained in LER-93-006.

.

Ihe Date When Full Comoliance Will be Achieved j

Full compliance was achieved on May 15, 1993.

.

t s

,

,

!

!

!

!

i l

3 of 3

-

,

..-a-

- -

- -

- -

--