IR 05000317/1989022

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-317/89-22 & 50-318/89-24 on 890925-28.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Including Mgt Controls,Qc & Assurance Program for Analytical Measurements
ML19325D582
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/10/1989
From: Bores R, Jang J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML19325D580 List:
References
50-317-89-22, 50-318-89-24, NUDOCS 8910250068
Download: ML19325D582 (5)


Text

,

..

.o

.

,,

,

..

,

"

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

50-317/89 22 Report Nos.

50 318/89-24

50-317 Docket Nos.

50 318 DPR-53 License Nos. DPR 69 Priority Category

.C

'

-

Licensee:

Baltimore Gas and Electric Company E O. Box 1475 giftimore, Maryland 21203 Facility Name: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 Inspection at: Calvert Cliffs Site, BG&E Electric Test Department Laboratory, and Fort Smallwood Inspection Conducted:

September 25-28, 1989

!

/4-/d-2 Inspector:

.. Jang, Sr. Radiation Specialisti date ERPS, FRSSB, DRSS Approved by:

16 -/6 - 99

.

VA.' Bores chief, Effluents Radiation date v Protection Section, FRSSB, DRSS Inspection Summary : Inspection of September 25-28, 1989 (Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-317/89-22 and 50-318/89-24)

environmental monitoring program including management controls, gicalquality control Areas Inspected:

Routine, unannounced inspection of the radiolo and assurance program for analytical measurements,l environmental monitoringcalibratio instruments, and implementation of the radiologica program.

Results: Within the areas inspected, no violations were identified.

The Ticenseo was implementing an effective radiological environmental monitoring program, i

l'

i

!

!

l e91025oo6e spio30

$DR ADOCK 03o99337

,

t l

FDC

_ _.

_ _ _ _ _

_. _ _ _ _

..

_

_

i

.-

.

'

-

.

_

l i

i DETAILS

1.0 Individuals Contacted L. Bartel, Sr. Radiochemist, Chemical Engineering & Test Laboratory

  • M. Gavrilas, Environmental Scientist, Environmental Programs, Technical

,

Services, fossil Engineering Service Department

'

W. Gunter, Associate Engineer Technician, Chemical Engineering & Test Laboratory

!

K.Kraus,k, Technician,ChemicalEngineering&TestLaboratoryChemical Engineering &

C. Kurlic

  • T. Pritchett, General Supervisor, Technical Services, Fossil Engineering Service Department i

E. Reichert Principal Engineer Chemical Engineering & Test Laboratory

'

    • L. Russell,, Manager, Calvert C1Iffs Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2

,

  • Denotes those individuals who were present at the exit meeting on September 28 1989.
    • ExItinterviewbytelephoneonSeptember 28, 1989.

The inspector also interviewed other licensee employees.

2.0 Management Controls The inspector reviewed the licensee's n.anagement controls for the l

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) including an assignment of responsibility and program audits.

'

2.1 Assignment of Responsibility i

The inspector reviewed the organization for administration of the REMP and discussed with the licensee any changes made since the last inspection in

'

November 1988.

The inspector determined that the REMP remains the same as it was al. the time of the last inspection in thh area.

2.2 Audit

'

The inspector reviewed the quality assurance (QA) audit results (Audit

.

Number 89-06, dated June 19Offsite Dose Calculatlon Man)ual and plant effluent controls.

1989.

This audit covered the areas of the TheInspectornotedthattherewereno(ODCM),findingsintheareasofREMP REMP audit i

l and ODCM requiring iicensee action or followup.

The inspector also noted

i that the audit was perfcrmed by qualified auditors, and was quite thorough

'

and of sufficient technical depth to assess the REMP.

The inspector had no

!

further questions in this area.

3.0 Licensee Program for Quality Control of Analytical Measurement

-

'

The inspector reviewed the licensee's analytical laboratery responsibility, facilities, laboratory quality control (QC), and selected procedures during i

J w-w

-,-ww

-

-e w

a

.

_-

f

.

'

l

.

,

'

!

!

,

l l

this inspection. All radiological environmental sample analyses were

,

performed by the Chemical Engineering and Test Laboratory of the Electrical

!

Test Department. This laboratory has responsibility to collect REMP

samples, and perform calibrations of the air samplers and meteorological

instruments.

The inspector toured the analytical laboratory, including i

the REMP sample preparation room, radiological counting laboratory, and TLD irradiation room.

!

r The inspector reviewed quality control data for source checks and l

liquid scintillation unckgrounds for the gamma spectrometry systems, l counter including QC counter, and low background gas flow proportiona control charts. The inspector also reviewed interlaboratory comparisons Lincluding EPA cross checks and with the licensee's QC contractor

'

interlabora) tory and intralaboratory comparisons were within the licensee'sThe analy aboratory and intralaboratory comparisons.

-

'

acceptance criteria with the exception of a few results. These anomalous i

results were investigated and resolved by the licensee. The inspector had

'

no further questions in this area.

l The inspector reviewed the following selected laboratory procedures for the REMP.

.

o Laboratory Control o Beta Counter Calibration.Beckman Wide Beta II

.

'

o Low Volume Air Sampler Calibration o Calibration of Ge(Li) and Nal Detectors o TLD Calibration

'

o Trainin f

o Radiolo ical Counting Instrument Calibration Frequency l

o Air Par iculate Filter and Air Iodine Cartridge Changing j

l Based on the above review,lement t1e REMP.

the ins)ector determined that the licensee had j

adequate procedures to imp

'

4.0 Implementation of the REMP 4.1 Direct Observation Tho inspector examined approximately 95% of the REMP sampling stations including air samplers for iodines and vegetable sampling j

locations and TLD stations for the mea particulatesurementofdirectradiation. All l

air sampling equipment at the stations was operational at the time of the inspection. Vegetables were available at the sampling locations, and TLDs i

.

were placed at the designated monitoring stations.

'

4.2 Review t f Annual Reports The inspector reviewed the annual reports for 1987 and 1988. These reports provided thorough summaries of the environmental sampling and analyses.

l

-

-

-

- - -

J

i

'

.

.

)

-

.

.

'

$

]

)

The inspector noted that the licensee identified dairy cows at 4.8 kin from

)

the plant release point during the " Land Use Survey" conducted in 1988.

The inspector noted that there were no dairy cows identified in the 1987

annual report. The inspector therefore, visited the dairy farm and

)

verifiedthattherewereaboul10dairycowscurrentlygrazingatthis

location. The inspector discussed with the licensee the milk sampling and

iodine analysis at this station.

The inspector found that the licensee had already implemented the milk sampling and laboratory analysis of milk for iodine.

The addition of the milk sampling to the REMP will be incorporated in the very near future.

The inspector also reviewed the available 1989 analytical data for the REMP and intralaboratory and interlaboratory comparisons.

No violations were i

identified in this area.

.

4.3 Review of Other Reports The inspector reviewed the following special reports relate to the REMP.

o Wind Flows and Dispersion Conditions at Calvert Cliffs, September, 1985 o Remarks on Environmental Radioactivity following the Chernobyl (

Reactor Accident, April, 1987

o Using Chernobyl High Altitude Source Terms to Evaluate the Magnitude l

of the Past Troposheric Nuclear Events, April,1987

'

o Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Routine Operation, REMP Perspective, May 1989

,

The above reports were prepared by the Environmental Scientist who has

!

responsibility for REMP and published by the Environmental Programs,

,

Baltimore Gas and Electric Company. The inspector stated that these l

l reports were excellent in terms of their reflection of the implementation

-

I of the REMP on a broad scope and in the utilization of the technical

'

expertise in this area.

5.0 Meteorological Monitoring The inspector reviewed Procedure STP-M-461-0, licensee performed all the' Meteor l

and the most recent calibration results. The

L meteorological calibrations through the Chemical Engineering and Test it group, with the exception of the anemometers, which are calibrated by the l

National Institute of Science and Technology.

The calibrations were

.

performed semiannually as required by the Technical Specifications. All calibration results were within the licensee's acceptance criteria.

l l

l

.c

,/,

.

.

n,

..

,,

l

i i

i'

6.0 Exit Interview The inspector met the licensee representatives (denoted in Section 1.0) at the conclusion of the inspection on September 28, 1989.

The inspector

'

sumarized the purpose, scope, and findings of the inspection.

l l

L

,

i i

r l

\\

,

J

... _.