IR 05000315/1979018
| ML17317B526 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 07/18/1979 |
| From: | Boyd D, Masse R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17317B525 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-315-79-18, 50-316-79-14, NUDOCS 7909120135 | |
| Download: ML17317B526 (13) | |
Text
U. S, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-315/79-18; 50-316/79-14 Docket No. 50-315; 50-316 License No. DPR-58; DPR-74 Licensee:
American Electric Power Service Corporation Indiana and Michigan Power Company 2 Broadway New York, NY 10004 Facility Name:
Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and
Inspection At:
Donald C.
Cook Site, Bridgman, MI Inspection Conducted:
June 1-30, 1979 Inspector:
7-/8-7g Approved By:
D.
C. Boy, Acting Chief Reactor Projects Section
\\
Ins ection Summar Ins ection on June 1-30 1979 (Re ort No. 50-315/79-18.
50-316/79-14)
Areas Ins ected:
Review of operations, security, protection and prevention, restraint systems, and The inspection involved 70 inspector-hours onsite Inspector.
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations surveillance, fire procurement, activities.
by the NRC Resident were identifie DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- D. Shaller, Plant Manager
- B. Svensson, Assistant Plant Manager
+R. Lease, Operations Superintendent
+R. Dudding, Maintenance Superintendent E. Smarrella, Technical Superintendent H. Chadwell, Production Supervisor, Unit
C. Murphy, Production Supervisor, Unit 2
+J. Stietzel, Quality Assurance Supervisor M. MacCallister, Stores Coordinator The inspector also contacted a number of operators, technicians, and maintenance personnel during the course of the inspection.
-Denotes those present at one or more of the exit interviews.
2.
~Oeratiana The inspector maintained a continuous cognizance of operations.
This cognizance included random observations of Control Room activities and reviews of the following associated documentation:
a.
Control Room Logs b.
Shift Operating Engineer Logs c.
Auxiliary Logs (Radwaste, Evaporators, Makeup Plant, Turbine Room, etc.)
d.
Operating Orders e.
Standing Orders f.
Jumper/Lifted Iead/Blocked Annunciator Logs g.
Condition Reports h.
Clearance Permits The inspector also made random tours of the facility, observing radiation control, instrumentation, housekeeping, leaks, vibration, et No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
~Securit During tours and observations, the inspector verified that the licensee was complying with security requirements.
Observations included the following:
a.
Vital area doors, protected area doors and gates b.
Organization c.
Identification, badging, authorization d.
Search e.
Escorting f.
Communications No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Surveillance Testin The inspector observed surveillance tests in progress on ESF logic trains, ECCS valves, and Control Room fire detectors.
He verified that tests were in accordance with properly approved procedures and included prerequisites, acceptance criteria, instructions on restor-ation to normal; that the tests were technically adequate, were per-formed within frequencies dictated by Technical Specifications, and were performed by qualified individuals.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Fire Protection and Prevention The inspector reviewed work control procedures, quality assurance procedures, design change controls, emergency procedures, etc.
relative to fire protection for the facility to determine their adequacy.
The inspector also toured various areas of Unit 1 and Unit 2 to observe fire controls, general housekeeping, and oper-ability of fire fighting and extinguishing equipment.
The inspector verified that fire drills are conducted on a regular basis (normally one per week).
Since the last inspection in this area, the facility demonstrated the ability to fight a fire of major proportions when a
generator hydrogen fire occurred on November 13, 1978. '
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Pi e Restraint and Su ort S stems Various restraints, spring hangars, hydraulic snubbers and supports were inspected visually for deterioration, corrosion, deformation, tightness of bolts, nuts, etc., lubrication, equipment lockup, seal integrity, and expansion travel of associated pipes or components.
The inspection included lateral supports on steam generators and the following:
a.
Restraints:
25.12620.007-2 25.12620.007-3 25.12620.007-4 25.12620.007-8 25.12620.007-15 25.12620.007-16 b.
Spring Hangars:
R.43 R.44 R.46 c.
Hydraulic Snubbers:
MSS-3 MSS-6 d.
Hydraulic Support:
PMK-8 e.
Supports:
GRC-C590 No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Procurement The inspector verified that proper procurement specifications were used for the purchase of various equipment including approvals, quality control and records.
The inspector also verified adequacy of receipt inspections, proper handling procedures including control and separation of conforming and nonconforming parts and components.
Equipment traced was as follows:
a
~
Main steam isolation valve discs b.
Signal conditioning modules for the rod position indicating system c
Reactor coolant pump seal assemblies
d.
Heat trace tubing for electrical penetrations e.
Various small spare parts The inspector also conducted a tour of the licensee's storage areas.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8.
Demonstration On June 2, 1979, a demonstration was held adjacent to the-plant.
The demonstration lasted for approximately an hour and included speeches and songs.
There were approximately 110 people present of various ages.
The demonstration was peaceful and no arrests were made.
The event received local media coverage.
9.
Inadvertent S ra At 3:30 a.m.,
on June 25, 1979, while performing a surveillance test to cycle various ECCS valves in preparation for startup, the Unit 2 containment upper volume was sprayed with approximately 1000 gallons of primary coolant when a pressurized RHR spray valve (backup to Containment Spray)
was cycled open.
The operating lineup at the time included the East RHR pump providing flow through the West RHR heat exchanger which is an acceptable flow path.
The surveillance test, however, is keyed to the non-running RHR pump and not a cross-tie situation, which was the case.
Thus, with the East RHR pump running, the test would call for cycling the West RHR spray valve since the header would not be pressurized.
The West RHR spray valve was cycled with the line pressurized.
The error was immediately recognized and the valve closed after being'pen for approximately 15 seconds.
No personnel were contaminated.
There were no releases to the environment.
The licensee immediately implemented a cleanup program, and has committed to revising the associated procedure to prevent recurrence.
The inspector witnessed the successful re-test of the valve at a later date.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
10.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives at the conclusion of weekly inspections on June 8, 15, 22 and 29, 1979.
The scope and findings of the inspections were discussed.
Attachment:
Freliminary Inspection Findings
"VLX~eaXXARY Vi,"SPECTXOh PXK)XXGS I
I LXCZhSiE 2.
RiGXOaXAL OPFXCr.
Amer'can Zlecfric =ower Svc. Co,.
Xnd ana
& Yichigan Power Company 2 Broadway hew York, NY lOOM D. C. Cook Unit 1 (ii)"...(.~.an. vXX D. C.
Cook Uni:
(Br:.c'.oman,
?~".)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co,..mission Office of Xnspect'on
En orccmcnt,RXX" 7~9 Roosevelt Road allen Zllyn, XL 60137 DOCxE 'aUYi!'I"ao la.
o:C"Ã".'o.."".."."RS 50-315 50-3'..6 D, R I
)
DA Z OZ ~wsrsl.
Oi I
,r=
anr n
6.
within tele scope of thQ nspection.
no items of noncomp iance or devi."."ion we.e four.d.
7.
The followin~ matters are pre iminary inspection findings:
These pre'inary irspec ion ~indies wi..
oe reviewed by heRC Suoerv;o../
- /enablement at "he RegionXXX Office and tnay wi" 1 correspond w tel yc":.
concecccng any enfo-"cameo-ac=ion.
Ia//-'///
ivuc*da-: Regulatory Comrissior. Xrspectcr
/
PRF~"'YiTYAP:~ XYSP"-C".":Obi
"ND ii'GS 2.
RKGXOiXA~ OFFICE Ame"-='can Elec"x'xc Pove" Svc.
Co>>p.
Xnc'..'ana 6 Nlch.'.gan PoreCo'oany 2 Dx'oadvay Zev Vo".2, hY 1008.;.
D ~
C ~
Coot(
~On~
~
z.iÃ..C,,'~r'T...n J.S.
hucleax Regulatox'y Co"..m'ss.'or.
Of 'cc of Xnspectxon 6 ~nfo~cem n',R".."
7o/r Rooseve3.t Road r len "1'n, X'0137
~Ui~~i'3S 5. DA'rT'F TXSPZt"~ZW r,
l
~ll 3.
OUGK"T YUi'""!'i?b 50-315 50-316 D.":i.'.-5S
~ \\'
lg 7.
~lie fol 0'4'3.ng
.".ttn>>.. a-c o..ellm. na y ilnspec Ron f"nd3.vgs:
iaaf.tn~n t'ne scope of 'e
.ns, cc" ~ on, no i.tems of noncomp"::.ance o.".
c'. v:.a".ons r'exe
. o"nd.
v
~
~
lnese p
e tm.,'n g>
.',nspnc
.'n
. nd. ngs r>.,'l oe>>ever ed ov )>RC Sne v.','on/
iianagement at
".he Reg:.on "ZZ Of -..ce and "ney w.11 cox'"espnnd v,"'"'. yo.;
concexn.'ng any enfo>>cemnnt act cn.
~)/~i/J.'>y Comm: ss.'.on
RELX.iXKARY XZSPECiXO'Z FXZDXZGS I
I
"XCEXSEE 2.
RECXOZAL OFFXCE American E" ecgric Power Svc.
Corp.
Xndiana 6 michigan Powe" Company 2 Broadway Zcw York, hY 10004 D. C.
Cook Unit 1 (3;.idgman,
!AX)
D. C. Cook Un"
(3ridgman, v. )
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ofiice o Xnspec tion 6 En orcemen',XiX:
799 Roosevelt Road C'len El'n, XL 60137 I 4 ~
I DOCK"'l'XUv~6RS 50-315 5G-3"6
$ 4 ~
':C"KSE DPR-5S r 2
~
~ V'
~
~
J LXU+iS'S
'5.
DA'r.- O.
XZSPEC"':OX I
Dpi-74
~U~)-
I
)faith n the scope o-"- the "'nspect"'on.
no items o-noncompliance o-deviations we e ound
~
.ne "o"lowing matte "s " e prc"";:.=nary inspection iindings:
'lhese preliminary inspection iirdings will be reviewed by QC Supcrvisio"../
Yianagement at the Region XXX Oi ice and they w 11 correspond w'h you concerning any en orcement action.
I>>
PRELIYDi;cViY DS~" C iIOZ E"..'ZDDi'CS CENSEE
RECXONAL OP'ICE Amer'can Elec"ri.c Po"e'er Svc.
Coro.
Indiana 6 N'cn.pan 7o~;er Cc-...beany 2 3roacvay Ve~ york, n
"Ooe<;.
D. C. Cook Unit 1 (P.r.d~"..>cn v.
D. C.
Cook Un-'.
(~-'~"""-
3. DOGIE'1'UQ>ill 50-315 50-3'6 DPR-7L U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co-.....,.ss:.cn Office of inspect'on
& Enfor men".R;.":."..
799 Roosevelt Road
<len Ellyn, XL 60137.
'5 ~
DAVE OP Da'SPE'"";.'N pQ i 'p ql V. th n tne scope of tnc.;nsoec
. on)
no were found.
'tens of nonconol ance or dev.."..":.ons I~
7o
~le 03.1o'v:.A~
'Ra.ters a e ore..:.~'arv:.nsoecti.on f.~nd.".I'~$ :
I I
I lnese prel."-P.";. ary;.ns?)ect:.c"L
~ M'.o.np" ~~>pl he rev~ e~~ed Qy QQC S"oe;; -
o /
concern'n~
ny en orce-...ent act5.on.
~/
Z c..
r Ficgul. tory Co';,.~ass.o:.. "...".'~actor
J f