IR 05000309/1990018
| ML20058G961 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Maine Yankee |
| Issue date: | 11/01/1990 |
| From: | Knapp M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Frizzle C Maine Yankee |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9011140136 | |
| Download: ML20058G961 (24) | |
Text
y5 o
-
-
.
.
-
.
,
.
,
- '
!
.
l NOV 011990:
L
,
l (
Docket No. 50-309 l
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company ATTN:
Mr. Charles D. Frizzle
'
President 83 Edison Drive Augusta, Maine 04336
'
Gentlemen:
.
Subject:
Enforcement Conference No. 50-309/90-18 This letter r-fers to the Enforcement Conference that was held on
-
October 18, 1990, in our Region I office - The purpose of the Conference was to discuss a potential violation involving a. fitness-for-duty (FFD) related event, which was reviewed during our initial inspection of your FFD program and which is documented in NRC Region I Inspection Report Number 50-309/90-18.
The attendees at the conference are listed in Enclosure l'.-
During the conference, your staff presented a history af the Maine Yankee FFD program, a description of the event, which they confirmed was essentially as is
'
documented in our inspection report, a root cause analysis,:a review of the corrective actions taken to prevent recurrt ace, 'and Maine Yankee's-assessment of the safety significance of the event, The outline for the presentations is enclosed (Enclosure 2).
'
We found the information provided to be very -helpful in determining the proper enforcement sanction to be applied.
In-particular, we considered your strong commitment to the NRC's FFD rule, your aggressive. audit program to-ensure the effective implementation of your FFD program, and your prompt and l
comprehensive actions to prevent recurrence of the event.
W_ e have determined that the event represents a Severity Level IV, violation.as an isolated-failure to meet a basic element of the FFD program.
That decision also considered the f;110 wing:
at about the time of the event, over 1300 test results had been
,
correctly processed, over one-half of which were processed in about a_30-day I
,
i l
period preceding the time of the improperly processed test. result; and, since l
that time, over 1100 test results have been processed without error.
In addition, we determined that the violation meets the criteria in the NRC's l
Enforcement Policy,Section V.G.1 for enforcement discretion; therefore, we are a
'
treating this as a non-cited violation. ;40twithstanding the foregoing, we want to reiterate the serious nature of our concern over this event and caution you
~
that similar occurrences in the future may result in escalated enforcement l-action.
Your staff advised us during the conference of two inaccuracies documented i_n
'
our report of the inspection concerning details of your random testing procedure.
Both inaccuracies appear in paragraph 8.a. on page_11 of'the report. The second sentence of that paragraph states, "A-list'of persons to be
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY EC REPORT MY -
. f.
10/31/90~
0001.0.0 t
--I'
9011140136 901101-l C=
PDR ADOCK 05000309
,
o PDC
}
_
c
.
.
'
l NOV 011990
.
.
,
,
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company
-
l tested randomly is generated by a computer each day from a pool of.all persons l
with station access." That sentence should read, "A list of persons to be tested randomly is generated by a computer each day from a pool of all Maine Yankee employees in addition to all contractors with unescorted access to the station." The fifth sentence of that paragraph states, "In that case, a
,
I specimen is collected at corporate headquarters." That sentence should read,
"In that case, the individual must report to the site collection station for testing within a pre-established time limit."
We appreciate the information that was provided during the meeting and believe that the meeting was mutually beneficial in understanding and resolving the issue.
i Your cooperation with us in this matter is appreciated.
!
Sincerely, l
Original Signed By:
l
'
Malcolm R. Knapp Malcolm R. Knapp, Director Division of Radiation Safety j
and Safeguards Enclosure:
1.
Conference Attendees 2.
Maine Yankee Fitness-For-Duty Enforcement Conference Agenda
cc w/ encl:
J. Randazza, Assistant Chairman of the Board
-
J. H. Garrity, Executive Assistant to the President
!
E. T. Boulette, Vice President, Operations P. L. Anderson, Project Manager l
J. D. Firth, Vice President, Public and Governmental-Affairs i
G. D. Whittier, Manager, Nuclear Engineering and Licensing l
R. W. Blackmore, Plant Manager
'
.,
!
J. A. Ritsher, Attorney (Ropes and Gray)
i Peter Brann, Assistant Attorney General l
l U. Vanags, Maine State Planning Office i
Maine Yankee Hearing Service List
'
Public Document Room (PDR)
!
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
'
,
l Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
l NRC Resident Inspector
'
State of Maine, SLO Designee j
'l
't F
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY EC REPORT MY'- 0001.1.0
!
10/31/90=
I a
,
.
'
..,.
.,
-
r
.
.-
,
,
'
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company
-
'
- NOV 0 f193
<
i bec w/ enc 1:
i
'
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences):
]
ManagementAssistant,DRMA(w/oenc1)
e R. Bellamy, DRSS
!
J. Johnson, DRP j
.
E. McCabe, DRP
'
!
H. Eichenholz, SRI - Vermont Yankee i
M. Conner, SALP Reports.Only
K. Abraham, PA0 (27) SALP Report and (2) All Inspection Reports
!!
J. Caldwell, EDO
-;
E. Trottier, LPM, NRR-i
- i
,
-
,
+,
i E
,
!
l t
l
>
.o
I i
1.
?
..
l
.
!
.
i
.t
!
-p
-RI:
SS RI:
S I.nRSS.
F DRSS
.f Dexte /mk-Ke niig
'Wo i
.
oyMer 1 Kn p:
.!
c 10/FI/90-10/J/ /90 0/11/90-g
/90-
'
l-0FFICIAL' RECORD COPY EC EFORT MY - 0002.0.0
.
10/31/90:
,
,
..
!!
!
'
f
!
,i
=
-a
,
- e-
,
c.
o-
+. - - - -
,
-
-
s,
-r
.
'
Safe
%guardsNo.2 09-(continued)
.
'
Yankee Atomic Electric *ompany Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company ATTN: Mr. P. L. Ander un ATTN: Mr. John H. Garrity Project Manager for Maine Yankee Vice President 580 Main Street Engineering and Licensing Bolton, Massachusetts 01740-1398 83 Edison Drive Aur,usta, Maine 04336 Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company ATTN: Mr. J. Randazza ATTN: Mr. J. :
Firth Assistant Chairman of the Vice Presioent, Public and Board Governmental Affairs 83 Edison Drive 83 Edison Drive Augusta, Maine 04336 Augusta, Maine 04336
,
Maine State Planning Office State of Maine, SLO Designee ATTN: Mr. Uldis Vanags Mr. Clough Toppan, Manager 184 State Street Radiological Health Program State House, Station 36 Dept of Human Services Augusta, ME 04333 State House (Sta 10)
Augusta, ME 04333 MAINE YANKEE HEARING UDVJCE LIST Mr. Charles B. Brinkman Mr. G. D. Whittier, Manager i
Manager, Washington Nuclear Operations Nuclear Engineering and Licensing
'
Com:>ustion Engineering, Inc.
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 330 83 Edison Drive Rockville, Maryland 20552 Augusta, Maine 04336 John A. Ritsher, Esq.
State Planning Officer Ropes & Gray Executive Department 225 Franklin Street 189 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Augusta, Maine 04330 Dr. E. T. Boulette, Vice President Mr. Robert W. Blackmore
,
Operations Plant Manager Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company P. O. Box 408 P, 0, Box 408
,
Wiseasset, Maine 04578 Wiscasset, Maine 04578 First Selectman of Wiscasset Mr. P. L. Anderson, Project Manager Municipal Building Yankee Atomic Electric Company U.S. Route 1 580 Main Street Wiscasset, Maine 04578 Bolton, Massachusetts 01740-1398 Resident inspector Regional Administrator, Region I Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station U.S. Nuclear Reguiatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road P.O. Box E King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Wiscasset, Maine 04578
.
.
.
.
'
.
.
.
!
. -.
l
.,
'
r
!
ENCLOSURE 1
'
-
'
,
,
Maine Yankee Enforcement Conference'
j October 18, 1990 l
t Conference Attendees.
l
,
A.
Maine Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation
r
I
'
P. S. Lydon, Vice President - Finance-and Administration-B. F. Castonguay, Manager - Administration P. R. Cooper, Director - Human Resources
.
_
G. D. Whittier, Manager - Nuclear Engineering and Licensing-
!
P. L. Metivier, Security Director l
>
i b,
Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
'
M. R. Knapp, Director, Division of. Radiation Safety.
and Safeguards (DRSS)
J. H. Joyner, Chief, Facilities Radiological. Safety-
.
!
and Safeguards Branch, DRSS.
t E. C. McCabe, Section Chief, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP)
i R. R. Keimig, Chief Safeguards Section, DRSS K. Smith, Region I Counsel
,
R. K. Christopher - Enforcement Specialist : Region I.
E. H. Trottier, Project Manager, Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)/-
Headquarters (HQ)
D. Serenci, Field Public Affairs Officer, Region I t
S. Wookey, Reactor Engineer, DRP
_
.
[
..
T. W. Dexter, Safeguards Inspector, DRSS-
- L. L. Bush, Chief, Program Development and Review Section, NRR/HQ
- E. W. McPeek, Reactor Security Specialist, NRR/HQ
- R. P. Rosano, Senior Enforcement' Specialist, Office of -
.
Enforcement /HQ L
- Indicates individuals who participated in.the conference via telephone with NRC Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland.:
l
l
'
ENCLOSURE 2
'
'
,
,
.
.,
.
MAINE YANKEE FITNESS FOR DUTY ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE OCTOBER 18,1990 AGENDA
,
i i
l l
lNTRODUCTION P. S. LYDON
'
MAINE YANKEE FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM B. F. CASTONGUAY
!
DESCRIPTION OF EVENT P. R. COOPER I
ROOT CAUSE EVALUATION & CORRECTIVE ACTIONS P. R. COOPER
l REVIEW OF SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE G. D. WHITTIER SUMMARY B. F. CASTONGUAY CLOSURE P. S. LYDON l
l l
,
j
,
,
i
. ~. ~.
- - -.. - - -
_ _ - _ - - _ _ _ - -...,
.. _ _ _ _. - _ _,.. _.. - _,...
. -. ~.
-. _ - - _ _.. _ _. - - - -. - -... ~.,., -, _......,. _,..
_
, 4..
'...
.
,
p
.
.
.
.
I I
'
i i
i
l FITNESS FOR DULY l'
i k,
AT
)
'
]
[
l I
MAINE YANKEE
,
i
!
l l
i A HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAM
,
'
i i
'
"To provide for a safe, drug and alcohol free workplace"
.
-.
.
.
.....
.
.
.
-.
...
. -
..
...
.. ~
.
.
.
.
l,
-
..
- -
-
.
.
.
-
-
-
l
- l l
!
!
l TIMELINE i
!
1979 - EAP PROGRAM INITIATED AT MAINE YANKEE l
1983 - SUBSTANCE ABUSE POLICY l
1985 - FFD PROGRAM INITIATED-l
- WRITTEN POLICIES / PROCEDURES EP
'
i ALCOHOL (SUBSTANCE ABUSE POLICY)
CONTINUAL BEHAVIOR OBSERVATION
PERIODIC DRUG TESTING
.
TRAINING (INITIAL)
'
DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS
- DRUG TESTING l
10 DRUGS PRE EMPLOYMENT PERIODIC (ANNUAL - DURING PHYSICAL)
PROMOTION
'
t FOR CAUSE FOLLOW-UP TESTING (AFTER 1ST POSITIVE)
e MET WITH UNION e IMPLEMENTED PROGRAM FROM THE TOP DOWN
.
1986 & 1987 - TESTIFIED BEFORE LEGISLATURE ON FFD
,
e-,r-r-,w---e.--r-ww-rn-m,,.
,--,
,--g-y
.. - - - -. -. -,
,-,wm,,
-,-a.,4wr-,
,v,-,.,-,-,,--.--
e-,-
- -,, -,, -.
w,e
.-,ee-.,,n,-.-a,-
--
.-.n----,e
. - - -,,.,,-,-
-
',
',.
.
.
.
1989 - REVISED FFD TO MEET 10CFR26 REQUIREMENTS e ESTABLISHED IMPLEMENTATION TEAM THAT INCLUDED:
OPERATIONS, LEGAL, MEDICAL, CONTRACT e MANAGED BY MATRIX
,
e NEGOTIATED WITH UNION e MAJOR AREAS OF CHANGE RANDOM DRUG TESTING
ALCOHOL TESTING CONTRACTOR INCLUSION
,
CHANGE LAB / DECREASE PANEL OF DRUGS
JAN 3,1990 - IMPLEMENTED NEW FFD PROGRAM APR 7,1990 REFUELING OUTAGE AUG 1317,1990 - YNSD AUDIT AUG 20,1990 - SUBMITTED FIRST 6 MONTH i
PERFORMANCE DATA FORM TO THE NRC AUG 2123,1990 - NRC FFD INSPECTION
!
I i
p+
v
- - - - - - - - -
,
i i
.
.
.
l
.-
-
~
i
,
,
1990
!
'
750
692 i
.
m 700
-
!
i
650
-
~
!
600
-
i
"
550
-
!
,
l
$
500
-
450
-
.
y ggy j
g 400
-
i
T 850
-
310
!
800
-
250
-
/
213 209
'
i y
200
-
'
.
k 150
-
105 i
j 100 - Si m
74
'
-g
-
l g
j o
O
.
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
,
I
.p
.
l RANDOM PRE-ACCESS
!
i
.
!
- -
'
,
i
,_
,
- _... -,.
-
-
- - -
_..
. _. -
-
.
,,,,
-.
.
.. -
...., _ _
.. -.. ~,.... _
_,-. - -._ - --.--.---.._________-______.____
___ _
.
.
.
.
,
,
.
-
.
i
-
!
FITNESS FOR DUW REFUELING PREPARATIONS l
FFD TRAILER FOR PRE-ACCESS TESTING
CONDUCTED PRE-ACCESS & SUPERVISORY TRAINING
FOR ALL CONTRACTED SUPERVISORS
.
REQU!stED CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE l
'
PROGRAM 3
,
l
'
INCREASED MAINE YANKEE AND CONTRACTED FFD
STAFF FOR REFUELING DEVELOPED FFD COMPLIANCE MANUAL
l EXTENSIVE USE OF MINI-AUDITS
.
, - - -,, -,. - -, -,,. -,.,.,,....,.,, _,,
-m
.,., _,
,, +,,. -, -
+w
,, w v v vre-*
-o- ~s~-rw-
- ~r-w--*m-~=--~--w"--er~-~-
-
'w
"v-~%*~~~--e---'w---,'='v**~~-
~ +,_,,--,------ -,.,-,-.,
_
.
.
.
-
.
...
.-
,
e a
PRESUMPTIVE POSITIVE CHRONOLOGY 3/20 (Tuesday)
Individual tested by his own company, iost r asult negative.
3/26 (Monday)
Specimen provided at the Maine Yankee Collection Center 3/31 (Saturday)
Smith /Kline lab reports test results to i'RO I
4/2 (Monday)
MRO's office faxes unsigned copy of test results to Collection Site eNegative results entered into the permanent record book based on-telephone conversation with M R O's office.
<
!
l i
l
.
..'
\\
..
i
.
,
' '
j
,
.
,
.
l l
!
l
i
)
I
,
4/3 (Tuesday)
Individual badged for unescorted
'
SCCess.
i l
I i
4/20 (Friday)
Individual tested by his own j
'
company, test results negative.
6/7 (Thursday)
Individual left site (access revoked)
i 8/15 (Wednesday)
YNSD Auditors express concern with MRO documentation
.
8/16 (Thursday)
MYinitiates full review of MRO, FFD records and discovers presumptive positive.
.
.
T i
i
.
. -... ~
..
..
...
... -..
.
......_..._,....._,
..._.........__.__.,_..__..-.,.._,_,....__..,.-,...,.:
-
^
.
!
.
)
l
-
-
,
l
'
-
.
.
-
.
!
i
'
8/17 (Friday)
UOR initiated
!
NRC notified l
)
'
Work review initiated
MRO corrective action initiated Individual contacted
,
8/20 (Monday)
HPES initiated Preliminary safety related work report
'
8/21 (Tuesday)
Incident details discussed with NRC audit team i
- i V
...
..
-. _ _. - _ -... - -, _
_-.
.. _.. -. _., _., _. -
m.....
__.,_...
--.....,_....m..
.,
.....r_,,.-_,.
,,,., -,,,,, ~,.. ~,,, -. -
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ -
_ _ _. - _ _
_.. _ _ _ _ _ - _ -. - _.
. - -. _ _. - - -
_
_
!-
.
!,..
.
.
l-
,
-
,
l
-
.
l l
l
-
i I
8/23 (Thursday)
MRO requests split sample tested
,
a 8/28 (Tuesday)
Lab reports positive result to MRO
.
!
Sultable inquiry files record positive
.
test result
'
0/29 (Wednesday)
Individual notified by employer Final report.on work evaluation received i
- -
...
.
_ __ _
.
-
.
.
.
...
.
.
.
.
..
i
'
..
.
.
,
_
l
-
.
i l
'
l
'
i
'
ROOT CAUSE hYALUATION
i
!
ROOT CAUSE:
l FAILURE OF MRO TO FOLLOW PROCEDURE.
'
l I
FAILURE TO VERIFY RECEIPT OF WRITTEN TEST RESULTS.
I
!
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS:
i
I
THE PAPERWORK RECEIVED FROM THE MRO FAILED TO
!
INDICATE CONFIRMED POSITIVE OR CONFIRMED NEGATIVE.
i
!
COLLECTION CENTER PERSONNEL BELIEVED MRO WAS AWARE
!
OF TEST RESULTS AND HAD DISPOSITIONED NEGATIVE.
!
DISCUSSIONS WITH MRO'S OFFICE RESULTED IN-DRUG
'
SCREEN RESULTS BEING PROCESSED AS NEGATIVE.
.
!
'
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
i
!
!
I
~
.
- -
..
.
.-
.
-
.
- -
-
.
.
'.
..
,
.
.
j CORRECTIVE ACTION SUMMARY
- l j
'
- l lMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
VERIFIED INDIVIDUAL WAS NO LONGER ON SITE
,
COUNSELED MRO
!
'
CONFIRMED PRESUMPTIVE POSITIVE
.
i
.
REVIEWED WORK PERFORMED
l COMPLETE REVIEW OF MRO AND COLLECTION SITE RECORDS
!
o 2569 DRUG TEST RESULTS i
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE
,
!
MRO PROCEDURES REVISED
l l
MRO CHECKLIST REQUIRED
1 COLLECTION SITE PROCEDURES REVISED
l COLLECTION SITE COORDINATOR REVIEWS ALL POSITIVES
'
OR DECLARED NEGATIVES WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO
RECORDING RESULTS INCREASED AUDITING l
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF MRO RECORDS j
l ANNUAL AUDIT OF MRO PROCESS AND FILES
..
-..
..
.. _.. _.. _... _ _.. _.., _ -.. _
_..., _ _. -. _, _ _ _..
. _ _ _.
_. _. _.. _.. _ __.._... _. _ _ _ __ _ _. _ ____ _ _____ _ _
'
.
j..
..
,
,
j
'
-
.
l l
!
I l
'
!
!
!
l
-
!
WORK ASSESSMENT
)
WORKED FOR ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE
,
a p
ASSESSMENT PERFORMED BY ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE OVERALL
.-
l
'
.
!
VERY PROFESSIONAL
-
!
NO UNUSUAL BEHAVIOR
!
-
i
'
'
SELF MOTIVATED
-
ONE OF BETTER WORKERS l
-
I
r
!
.
i
'
!
!
i
!
!
^
>
t
.
. - -. - -.
....
...
- - - - - - -.
- -
--
-
-. -.. - - -.. - -
- -. - -.. - -
-
. -. _. - - - - - - - - _ _ - -
_ - _ _
.
.
..
..
<
.
.
.
.
,
i
)
!
l
-
i
,
I I
i
-
!
l
1 TEMPORARY POWER j
i
-
i i
i i
!
TEMPORARY POWER FOR OUTAGE
WORKED ALONE NO PROBLEMS i
ALL DISCONNECTED f
i
!
!
!
,
i
-
1i
[
l l
l f
i I
i
'
.
i i
a h
'4
. _. _ -. _. - -,,. -. - _, -.... _.... _, _, _
.,.-.,.l..
- -
. ~..
..
.-
.. -.
,_ _ _ _ _ _ -. _, _.. -... _..
-
-
_ _ _ _.. _. _ _. _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _.. _ _. _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _. _ _. _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _
l
'
.
.
.
i
.
..
,
t
.
-
,
!.
.
,
.
,
i
,
,
i
.
l
<
t
.
>
!
I l
!
!
,
I
!
.
,
i i
'
l WORK ASSIGNMENTS ii
,
,
.
!
,
'
i
.
.
TEMPORARY POWER
!
I i
NON-NUCLEAR SAFETY CLASS l
SAFETY CLASS
.,
.
r
!
i
-
i
t
!-
!
.
l f,
h
!
!
.
l
!
i
?
w E
I
!
'
...-.
...
.
..
...
.
......
.._._..-..._.__......_.,_,.
. - -. _,....... _..., _.,
!'
..
j.,
-
.
,
,
l'
,.
i j
!
l NON NUCLEAR SAFETY
$
.1 i
ALWAYS WORKED WITH MAINE YANKEE PERSON NO PROBLEMS NOTED l
JOBS WORKED:
.
ISO PHASE BUS LEADS COOLER PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
!
HYDROGEN SEAL OIL MOTOR OVERHAUL
l MAIN GENERATOR VOLTAGE REGULATOR CLEANING
'
INSTALLED A CONDENSER WATER BOX MOTOR OPERATED VALVES
DISCONNECTED MOTOR GENERATOR SETS j
CHANGED CAVITY LIGHTS AND CORD CAPS MOTOR CONTROL CENTER CLEANING 4160 BREAKER PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
,
MOLDED CASE CIRCUlT BREAKER TESTING
t
.
--
.
.,,
,,-.-...,,~~,-,....-..~..-........_.-c--_
.....,,.
.,.-.,.,..,,-m,
.,-,.,,,,
.m.,-,-,ww.----w..-,-,.,
,
-e--
. - -
,
'
-
.
.
!
...
-
.
,
,
i
l
..
,
-
.
i I
!
I
'
,-
>
NUCLEAR SAFETY CLASS
ALWAYS WORKED WITH ' MAINE YANKEE PERSON
QUALIW CONTROL COVERAGE AT HOLD POINTS NO PROBLEMS NOTED
,
$
JOBS WORKED:
-
,
MOLDED CASE CIRCUlT BREAKER TESTING MOTON CONTROL CENTER CLEANING 4160 BREAKER PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
.;
+
'
.
.
!
[
!
h
..
..
..
.
.
..
.
.. - -
..
.
.....
... - _. _. _. _ _. _.. _ - _, _ _
_
-. _ _ - _ _. _... _.. _ _
l-
..
'
'
l
-
.
'
i-
.
,,.
'
l i
!
SUMMARY l
MAINE YANKEE COMMITTED TO SAFE / DRUG & ALCOHOL FREE l
'
WORKPLACE I
j
- INTEGRITY & COMMITMENT TO PROGRAM MAINTAINED
,
!
'
FFD PROGRAM STRONG
)
!
'
-ISOLATED FAILURE TO FOLLOW P
'CEDURE
NO SAFETY RELATED ISSUES CONNECTED WITH INCIDENT
-
INDIVIDUAL DID NOT WORK AT OTHER SITES SUBSEQUENT TO
.
INCIDENT
.
PROMPT & THOROUGH CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO
PRECLUDE RECURRENCE OF INCIDENT l
INCIDENT IDENTIFIED THROUGH A STRONG INTERNAL QA REVIEW
.
l
i
. _ _, _.. _.....
.,. _.. - _ _..... - _,..
_,,,.. _......, _., _.. _., _ _ _.. _.. _.... _, _.,
.. _.. _ _. -... - - _ _ _ _,... -.... -
_ _ _ _
'
-
-
.
'
..
.
.
EVENT SUMMARY t
FITNESS FOR DUTY BASIC ELEMENTS WERE ACHIEVED ALCOHOL AND DRUG TESTING
- PRE ACCESS
- RANDOM CERTIFIED LAB MRO REVIEW OF TEST RESULTS
'
- PERSONAL CONTACT WITH ALL PRESUMED POSITIVES
- MRO IS THE ONLY ONE WHO CAN DECLARE A POSITIVE
ACCESS REMOVED / DENIED IN THE EVENT OF A POSITIVE TEST
POSITIVE RESULTS REPORTED VIA SUITABLE INQUIRY
'
EAP SERVICES
!
l
.
...,......
.
.
________.l__