IR 05000298/1981020
| ML20032D693 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 10/28/1981 |
| From: | Dubois D, Westerman T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20032D689 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-298-81-20, NUDOCS 8111170396 | |
| Download: ML20032D693 (4) | |
Text
_
__.
._.
.
_ _ -
.
.
.
.
,
,
APPENDIX
,-
'
-U.
S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,'
0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION IV
Report.No. 50-298/81-20 Docket No. 50-298 License No. OPR-46
Licensee: Nebraska Public Pcver District
'
Post Office Box 499
.
Columbus, Nebraska 68601
Facility Name:
Cooper Nuclear Station
'
Inspection At:
Cooper Nuclear Station, Nemaha County, Nebraska Inspection Conducted:
September 1-30, 1981
do L
2 p.- D or:
D. L. DuBols, Resident Reactor' Inspector ate Projects Section 1
i
/
,
l Approved by:
!6d (
//;-? v-y i T. F. Westerman, Chief, Froject Section 1 Date
j Inspection Summary:
'
Inspection on September 1-30, 1981 (Report No. 50-298/81-20)
<
Areas Inspected:
Routine, announced inspection of operational safety verifica-tion; monthly equipment surveillance and maintenance observations.
This
,
inspection involved 83 inspector hours on site by one NRC inspector.
'
l Results. Within the areas inspected no violations or deviations were identified.
I
i I
'
i
i 8111170396 811102 DRADOCK05000g
-
-
,
_. -
.
. -
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- L. Lessor, Plant Superintendent 9. Thomason, Assistant Plant Superintendent R. Creason, Operations Supervisor J. Sayer, C&HP Supervisor P. Borer, Engineering Supervisor
- Indicates presence at exit meetings.
2.
Goerational iafety Verificatior.
The NRC inspector cbserved control room operations, instrumentation, controls, reviewed applicable logs, and conducted discussions with control room operators.
The inspector verified operability of Standby Liquid Control System (M), #2 Diesel Generator (M), 'A'
and 'B'
Core Spray Systems (W), High Pressure Coolant Injection System (W), reviewed tagout records, and verified proper return-to-service of affected components.
He also verified that maintenance raquests had been initiated for equipment discovered to be in need of maintenance, that
,
the appropriate priority was assigned, and that maintenance was per-formed in a timely manner commensurate with the priority assigned.
Tours of accessible areas of the far-?lity were conducted to coserve normal security practices, plant ano equipment conditions including clesaliness, radiological controls, fire suppression systems, emergency
equipment, potential fire hazards, fluid leaks, excessive vibration and instrumentation adequacy.
These reviews and observations were conducted to verify that facility operations were in conformance with the requirements established in the Technical Specifications, 10 CFR and Administrative Procedures.
No violation or deviations were identified in these areas.
3.
Surveillance Observations The iv. pact.or observed portions of Technical Specification required surveillance testing to verify that testing was performed in accordance with adequate procedures, that test instrumentation was in calibration, that Limiting Conditions for Operations were met, that removal and restoration of the affected components was accomplished, that test results conformed with Technical Specifications and procedure require-ments and were reviewed by personnel other than the person directing the test, and that any deficiencies identified during testing were properly reviewed and resolved by appropriate management personnel.
'
.
-
. -
,
The following tests were selected and observed:
6.3.12.1, #2 Diesel Generator Operability Test 6.3.19.1, Standby Gas Treatment Operability Test 6.4.8.5, TIP-Ball Valve Exercising These reviews and observations were conducted to verify that facility operations were in conformance with the requirements established in the Technical Specifications, 10 CFR and Administrative Procedures.
No violations or deviations were identified in these areas.
4.
Maintenance Observations The inspector observed portions of the following maintenance activities:
WIT 81-0252, MDC 81-085 RR MG, Set Scoop Tube Replacement WIT 81-0892, MDC 80-079, Replacement of SBM Switches WIT 81-1589, MDC 81-064, Drywell SRV Supoorts WIT 81-1590, MDC 80-065 Torus Internals Modification WIl 81-1692, MDC 81-081 SW-M0-89B Re-modification WIT 81-1806, HPCI Turbine Inspection The following Clearance Orders were reviewed; placement and/or restora-tion verified:
C.0.81-463, RHR-M0-16B, (Placement)
C.O.81-464, HPCI Turbine, (Placement)
C.O.81-475, CS, RHR, HPCI, RCIC, (Placement)
C.O.81-496, 'B' RR Motor Generator Set, (Placement)
C.O.81-510, MSIV's, (Placement)
C.0.81-523, 'A' RR Motor Generator Set, (Placement)
C.O.81-453, 'C' Service Water Pump (Restoration)
C.0.81-468, ' A' and 'B' RHR Hx, (Restoration)
j
-
i
.-
-
-
- - - - -
-.
.
. - o-
.
..
s C.0.81-474, ' A' and 'B' CS Pumps Suctions (Restoration)
~ C.0.81-478, HPCI-M0-19. (Restoration)
C.0.81-479, REC Hx Service Water, (Restoration)
C.0.81-485, 'B' RR Motor Generator Set, (Restoration)
- -
C.O.81-489, RHR-M0-66-A, (Restoration) ~
'
j C.0.81-497, 'B'- RR MG Set Motor, (Restoration)
'
!
C.O.81-503, RCIC-M0-131, (Restoration)
C.O.81-522, 'A' RHR Pump Motor, (Restoration)
,
i C.0.81-528, Breaker IFE, (Restoration)
Included with the above were checks for availability of redundant equip-ment, adequate safety isolation and clearance, accomplishment of work in accordance with approved procedures and Technical Specification require-ments, verif; cation that QC checks were performed as required, clean-liness controls and health physics coverage was adequate.
No violations or deviations were identified in the above areas.
5.
Exit Meetings Exit meetings were conducted at the conclusion of each portion of the inspection. The Plent Superintendent was informed of the above findings.
,
.!
,
i
.,
<
I
)
4