IR 05000293/2018012
| ML18305A834 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 11/01/2018 |
| From: | Anthony Dimitriadis NRC/RGN-I/DRP/PB5 |
| To: | Brian Sullivan Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| Dimitriadis A | |
| References | |
| EA-17-086 IR 2018012 | |
| Download: ML18305A834 (20) | |
Text
November 1, 2018
SUBJECT:
PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION - CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER (EA-17-086) FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION REPORT 05000293/2018012
Dear Mr. Sullivan:
On September 14, 2018, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an on-site team inspection at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (PNPS). The NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with you and other members of your staff during an onsite debrief on September 14, 2018, and via teleconference exit on October 17, 2018. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report.
The NRC inspection team reviewed PNPSs progress in implementing the actions from the PNPS Recovery Plan that were committed to in the Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) dated August 2, 2017 (NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML17214A088) (EA-17-086). Specifically, for this inspection the team reviewed the adequacy of the corrective actions PNPS completed to address 45 individual CAL items in the Corrective Action Program, Operations Standards and Site Leadership, Risk Recognition and Decision Making, Procedure Quality, Engineering Programs, Equipment Reliability, and Work Management Area Action Plans. The team also reviewed site performance to determine whether the actions completed for these plans, in aggregate, achieved the safety performance improvement objectives stated in the PNPS Recovery Plan for those seven Area Action Plans.
Finally, the team conducted a targeted site safety culture assessment to properly assess individual CAL items with actions tied to safety culture and gather preliminary information for the final CAL follow-up inspection.
The team determined that all 45 individual CAL items reviewed and the 7 associated Area Action Plans were adequately completed and effective in achieving the associated PNPS Recovery Plan performance improvement objectives. As a result, the 45 CAL items and the Area Action Plans for Corrective Action Program, Operations Standards and Site Leadership, Risk Recognition and Decision Making, Procedure Quality, Engineering Programs, Equipment Reliability, and Work Management are closed.
No findings or violations of NRC requirements were identified during this inspection. In accordance with the guidance in Inspection Manual Chapter 0305, Operating Reactor Assessment Program, PNPS will remain within the Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone column of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix pending completion of all actions needed to close the CAL. To review the remaining CAL actions and Area Action Plans, the NRC currently plans to complete one additional quarterly CAL follow-up inspection in addition to the four already completed. The NRC staff will assess the effectiveness of Entergys implementation of these corrective actions and evaluate whether the safety performance of PNPS has demonstrated sustained improvement warranting transition of PNPS out of Column 4 in accordance with Inspection Manual Chapter 0305, Section 10.02d, paragraph 7. The final on-site CAL follow-up inspection is currently scheduled to be completed in December 2018, and the report documenting the results of that inspection to be issued shortly thereafter.
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 5 Division of Reactor Projects
Docket No. 50-293 License No. DPR-35
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000293/2018012 w/Attachment: Confirmatory Action Letter Item Status
Inspection Report
Docket Number:
50-293
License Number:
Report Number:
Enterprise Identifier: I-2018-012-0014
Licensee:
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
Facility:
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (PNPS)
Location:
Plymouth, MA
Inspection Dates:
09/10/2018 - 09/14/2018
Team Lead:
S. Rutenkroger, PhD, Senior Resident Inspector
Inspectors:
L. Cline Jr., Senior Project Engineer
Z. Hollcraft, Senior Resident Inspector
J. Krafty, Senior Resident Inspector
M. Keefe-Forsyth, Human Factors Specialist
S. Morrow, Human Factors Engineer
J. Dolecki, Resident Inspector
M. Hardgrove, Project Engineer
C. Roettgen, Resident Inspector
C. Safouri, Project Engineer
Approved By:
Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief
Reactor Projects Branch 5
Division of Reactor Projects
SUMMARY
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring Entergys performance at PNPS by conducting the fourth confirmatory action letter (CAL) follow-up inspection in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process is the NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information.
The team reviewed 45 of the 156 items that Entergy committed to complete in the PNPS CAL (EA-17-086). The items reviewed were associated with the Corrective Action Program (CAP),
Operations Standards and Site Leadership (OPS), Risk Recognition and Decision Making (RRDM), Procedure Quality (PQ), Engineering Programs (EP), Equipment Reliability (ER), and Work Management (WM) Area Action Plans. The team determined that all 45 individual CAL items reviewed and the associated Area Action Plans were adequately completed and effective in achieving the associated PNPS Recovery Plan performance improvement objectives. As a result, the 45 CAL items and these 7 Area Action Plans are closed.
No findings or more-than-minor violations were identified.
Additional Tracking Items
Type Issue number Title Report Section Status CAL
EA-17-086 PNPS Confirmatory Action letter Inspection Results 92702 Discussed
INSPECTION SCOPES
This inspection was conducted using the appropriate portions of the applicable inspection procedure in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved inspection procedures with their attached revision histories are located on the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess Entergys performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
- TEMPORARY INSTRUCTIONS, INFREQUENT, AND ABNORMAL
92702 - Follow-up on Traditional Enforcement Actions Including Violations, Deviations, Confirmatory Action Letters, Confirmatory Orders, and Alternative Dispute Resolution Confirmatory Orders
The inspectors reviewed the status of the corrective actions that Entergy had reported complete for 45 of the 156 items listed on Enclosure 2 of the PNPS CAL (EA-17-086)
(ADAMS Accession No. ML17214A088). The inspectors also conducted a targeted safety culture assessment to review the current status of PNPS corrective actions intended to improve site safety culture in these areas.
All 45 items reviewed for this inspection are identified in the Confirmatory Action Letter Item Status summary table included as an Attachment to this report. The inspectors also reviewed the status of the Area Action Plans associated with these 45 items, which in accordance with Enclosure 2 of the PNPS CAL included the CAP, OPS, RRDM, PQ, EP, ER, and WM Area Action Plans. Entergy had reported these seven Area Action Plans were complete and effective.
The inspectors evaluated these items to determine if:
- (1) CAL item corrective actions were completed in a timely manner consistent with their safety significance.
- (2) Area Action Plans were effective at addressing the performance issues identified in the CAL.
- (3) CAL performance metrics were appropriate and accurate.
- (4) Closure of each CAL item and Area Action Plan was completed in accordance with established PNPS procedural guidance.
- (5) PNPS corrected NRC-identified problems in PNPS implementation of actions taken for PQ-1.1 and PQ-5.2 (see NRC Inspection Report (IR) 05000293/2017010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18032A463)), and the adverse impact of these problems on the effectiveness of the PQ Area Action Plan.
- (6) PNPS safety culture actions to date had caused a sustained positive change in safety culture, specifically related to the CAP (see NRC IR 05000293/2018011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18282A039)) and RRDM Area Action Plans.
During this review, the inspectors completed the following specific activities:
- (1) Reviewed Entergys closure packages for each of the CAL action items.
- (2) Reviewed Entergys closure reports for each of the Area Action Plans.
- (3) Reviewed Entergys interim and final effectiveness reviews and self-assessments completed for the Area Action Plans.
- (4) Reviewed Entergys performance indicators and recovery metrics for the Area Action Plans through August 2018.
- (5) Overall, conducted 72 individual interviews, 8 focus group panel discussions, and multiple as-needed follow-up discussions with 117 PNPS staff, supervisors, managers, and directors from Plant Operations, Engineering, Maintenance, Production, Training, Security, Human Resources, Regulatory and Performance Improvement, Chemistry, Radiation Protection, and Recovery (including contract personnel such as Subject Matter Experts and Mentors in operations, corrective actions, and risk decision making).
- (6) Reviewed Organizational Health Index survey results, Nuclear Safety Culture Leadership Team and Monitoring Panel meeting minutes, Nuclear Safety Culture Advocate reports, and CAP subject matter expert assessment reports from 2016 through 2018.
- (7) Performed numerous walk-downs and independent field observations of the conduct of operations, in-progress training, and maintenance planning.
- (8) Observed site meetings associated with engineering reviews, work planning (multiple T-weeks), and daily/weekly production.
- (9) Reviewed procedures, procedure change requests and revisions, training presentations, case study presentations, training attendance records, critical decision making documents, what it looks like (WILL) sheets, backlog status reports, self-assessments, operating crew training performance and feedback records, final written and simulator examinations, operating crew event critiques, individual targeted performance improvement plans, coaching feedback records, work planning man-hour estimates, timesheets, critical and non-critical corrective and deficient backlog records, critical preventive maintenance deferred (and/or in grace) records, single-point and aging vulnerability assessments and records, and work orders.
INSPECTION RESULTS
Observation 92702 CAL Items Closed The team closed all of the following 45 CAL items (a narrative description of each item is listed in Enclosure 1 to the PNPS CAL (ADAMS Accession No. ML17214A088):
Corrective Action Program (CAP) - 1.3 and 1.8
Operations Standards and Site Leadership (OPS) - 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.7, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2, and 5.3
Risk Recognition and Decision Making (RRDM) - 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 4.8, and 4.9
Procedure Quality (PQ) - 1.1 and 5.2
Engineering Programs (EP) - 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 3.1, and 4.1
Equipment Reliability (ER) - 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3
Work Management (WM) - 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 3.3, and 4.2
CAL Area Action Plan Summary Review The inspectors concluded that the individual CAL items described above and the associated Area Action Plans were adequately completed and effective in achieving the associated performance improvement objectives described in the PNPS Recovery Plan.
Therefore, the following Area Action Plans listed in Enclosure 2 to the PNPS CAL are closed based on the reviews completed during this inspection:
Operations Standards and Site Leadership (OPS)
Risk Recognition and Decision Making (RRDM)
Engineering Programs (EP)
Equipment Reliability (ER)
Work Management (WM)
Actions associated with the PQ and CAP Area Action Plans were reviewed during previous inspections and these Area Action Plans were held open because additional action and review was required as documented in NRC IR 05000293/2017010 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML18032A463) and NRC IR 05000293/2018011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18282A039).
The basis for closure for these two Area Action Plans, considering the problems described in these resports, is described below:
PQ Area Action Plan:
The inspectors determined that PNPSs WILL sheet revisions, PQ training presentation, and extent of condition corrective actions adequately corrected the problems the inspectors previously identified with PNPS implementation of PQ-1.1 and PQ-5.2 per NRC IR 05000293/2017010. Combined with the adequate completion of the other PQ Area Action Plan CAL items per NRC IR 05000293/2017010, the inspectors concluded that the PQ Area Action Plan was adequately completed and effective in achieving the associated performance improvement objectives described in the PNPS Recovery Plan.
CAP Area Action Plan:
The inspectors concluded that based on the adequate completion of the CAP Area Action Plan CAL items documented in NRC IR 05000293/2018011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18282A039)) and the results of safety culture assessment activities conducted during the onsite week of this inspection (described below), the CAP Area Action Plan was adequately completed and effective in achieving the associated performance improvement objectives described in the PNPS Recovery Plan.
Targeted Safety Culture Assessment The inspectors conducted interviews and focus groups with 72 staff, first line supervisors, and managers, which represented about 14% of the workforce. The eight focus groups conducted were representative of the major departments at PNPS, including maintenance, operations, security, and engineering. The focus group discussions and interviews conducted as part of the scope of this inspection focused on the traits of a positive safety culture, with emphasis on leadership safety values and actions, problem identification and resolution, decision making, and work processes. Insights were also gathered by reviewing various subject matter expert reports, contractor-conducted surveys, and PNPS nuclear safety culture monitoring panel meeting minutes.
During the focus groups, PNPS staff indicated work management process changes had improved interdepartmental coordination and communication and had increased the recognition of the risk impact of planned work activities; while CAP changes had improved feedback to staff who initiate condition reports, increased the focus on taking timely action to correct safety concerns, and increased accountability at all levels of the organization for completing corrective actions.
The results of the focus group discussions indicated that most PNPS staff believe management places an appropriate level of emphasis on safety and makes conservative decisions that appropriately consider risk. PNPS staff also stated that they feel free to raise safety concerns without fear of retaliation and believe management would support stopping work to resolve safety concerns.
Based on the targeted scope of this assessment and the employee perceptions communicated during the interviews and focus groups, the inspectors noted a marked improvement in safety culture since the previous round of focus groups and interviews conducted in February 2017 and confirmed a sustained positive change in safety culture.
EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS
The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.
On September 14, 2018, the inspectors presented a debrief of the CAL follow-up inspection results to Mr. Brian Sullivan, Site Vice President and other members of PNPS staff.
On October 17, 2018, inspectors conducted a telephonic exit meeting and presented the final results for the CAL follow-up inspection items documented in this report to Mr. Brian Sullivan, Site Vice President and other members of PNPS staff.
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
CAL Item Closure Packages
CAP-1.3
CAP-1.8
OPS-1.1
OPS-1.2
OPS-1.4
OPS-1.6
OPS-1.7
OPS-2.2
OPS-3.1
OPS-3.2
OPS-4.1
OPS-4.2
OPS-5.3
RRDM-1.1
RRDM-1.2
RRDM-1.3
RRDM-2.1
RRDM-3.1
RRDM-3.2
RRDM-3.3
RRDM-4.8
RRDM-4.9
PQ-1.1
PQ-5.2
ER-1.3
ER-2.1
ER-2.2
ER-3.1
ER-3.2
ER-3.3
WM-1.1
WM-1.2
WM-1.3
WM-2.1
WM-2.2
WM-3.1
WM-3.3
WM-4.2
Procedures
1.13.2, Vendor and Technical Information Review, Revision 1
1.3.142, Critical Decision Process, Revision 7
1.3.142, Critical Decision Process, Revision 8
1.3.142, PNPS Risk Review and Disposition, Revision 6
1.3.145, PNPS Recovery Procedure, Revision 3
1.3.145, PNPS Recovery Procedure, Revision 4
1.3.145, PNPS Recovery Procedure, Revision 5
1.3.34, Operations Administration Policies and Processes, Revision 162
1.4.80, PNPS Monthly Performance Review Meeting, Revision 0
2.1.14, Station Power Changes, Revision 120
3.M.3-47, Load Shed Relay Operational/Functional Test - Critical Maintenance, Revision 94
3.M.3-47.1, "A" Train Functional Test of Individual Load Shed Components - Critical
Maintenance, Revision 41
3.M.3-47.2, "B" Train Functional Test of Individual Load Shed Components - Critical
Maintenance, Revision 38
3.M.3-61.3, Emergency Diesel Generator Quarterly Preventative Maintenance - Critical
Maintenance, Revision 32
3.M.4-14.2, Salt Service Water Pumps: Routine Maintenance, Revision 69
3.M.4-9, Inspection of the Drywell and Suppression Chamber, Revision 22
8.5.2.13, RHR Keepfill Valve Leak Test, Revision 8
8.9.8.4, 125 Vdc Station 650 Primary Battery Acceptance, Performance, or Service Test -
Critical Maintenance, Revision 13
8.C.40, Seasonal Weather Surveillance, Revision 38
8.C.40, Seasonal Weather Surviellance, Revision 42
8.E.24, Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) System "Q" Instrument Calibration
and Functional Test, Revision 15
8.E.24, Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) System Q Instrument Calibration
and Functional Test, Revision 15
8.F.38.1, Diesel Generator Instrumentation Calibration and Functional Test - Critical
Maintenance, Revision 47
8.I.11.3, Residual Heat Removal A Loop Valve Cold Shutdown Operability, Revision 10
8.M.2-2.10.12, HPCI High Water Trip Logic, Revision 22
8.M.2-2.10.8.6, Diesel Generator B Initiation by Loss of Offsite Power Logic - Critical
Maintenance, Revision 53
EN-DC-329, Engineering Programs Control and Oversight, Revision 6
EN-DC-351, Inservice Inspection Program, Revision 3
EN-FAP-DC-003, Fleet Engineering Morning Call, Revision 16
EN-FAP-OM-016, Performance Management Processes and Practices, Revision 9
EN-FAP-OM-021, Critical Decision Procedure, Revision 6
EN-FAP-OM-023, Entergy Nuclear Change Management, Revision 7
EN-FAP-WM-002, Critical Evolutions, Revision 5
EN-FAP-WM-011, Work Planning Standard, Revision 4
EN-OP-115, Conduct of Operations, Revision 25
EN-OP-116, Infrequently Performed Tests or Evolutions, Revision 14
EN-OP-117, Operations Assessment Resources, Revision 14
EN-WM-100, Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification, Revision 14
EN-WM-101, Online Work Management Process, Revision 16
EN-WM-104, On Line Risk Assessment, Revision 18
Audits/Self Assessments/Surveillances
CR-PNP-2016-09147 CA09, Project Plan for: Preventive Maintenance Program Improvements,
Revision 1, 6/2017
CR-PNP-2016-2054 CA-88, Final Effectiveness Review of Decision Making / Risk Recogntion
for July 2017 to April 2018, 05/18
LO-PNPLO-2016-00039 CA-01, Pre-NRC Preventive Maintenance Program Implementation
Self-Assessment, 12/16/2016
LO-PNPLO-2016-0031, Perform Assessment of Core Business Expectations Execution,
6/16/2016
LO-PNPLO-2016-0093,Snapshot Assessment Core Business Staffing, Man Hours, 9/28/2016
LO-PNPLO-2018-0035, Focused Self-Assessment - Pre-NRC / Engineering Programs AAP
LO-PNPLO-PNP-2016-00002 CA-21, Decision Making / Risk Recognition Fundamental
Problem Area, CR-PNP-2016-2054 Effectiveness Review for January 2017 to July 2017,
8/25/17
Pilgrim Periodic Maintenance Effectiveness Assessment, A Requirement of 10CFR50.65 (a)(3),
Operating Cycle 21
Pre-NRC / Risk Recognition & Decision-Making (RRDM) AAP Self-Assessment Report, 7/16/18
Condition Reports
CR-PNP-2016-02054
CR-PNP-2016-02057
CR-PNP-2016-07115
CR-PNP-2016-08957
CR-PNP-2016-09805
CR-PNP-2016-10130
CR-PNP-2017-00403
CR-PNP-2017-05075
CR-PNP-2017-09271
CR-PNP-2017-11506
CR-PNP-2017-12124*
CR-PNP-2017-12166
CR-PNP-2017-12193
CR-PNP-2017-12212
CR-PNP-2017-12299
CR-PNP-2018-01734
CR-PNP-2018-03017
CR-PNP-2018-03392
CR-PNP-2018-03711
CR-PNP-2018-03881*
CR-PNP-2018-03943*
CR-PNP-2018-04234
CR-PNP-2018-05401
CR-PNP-2018-05887
CR-PNP-2018-06160
CR-PNP-2018-06309
CR-PNP-2018-06964
CR-PNP-2018-07211*
CR-PNP-2018-07234*
CR-PNP-2018-07245*
CR-PNP-2018-07257*
CR-PNP-2018-07262*
CR-PNP-2018-07262*
CR-PNP-2018-07266*
CR-PNP-2018-07271*
CR-PNP-2018-07286*
CR-PNP-2018-07299*
CR-PNP-2018-07305*
CR-PNP-2018-07311*
CR-PNP-2018-07314*
CR-PNP-2018-07337*
CR-PNP-2018-07339*
CR-PNP-2018-07340*
CR-PNP-2018-07428*
CR-PNP-2018-07493*
Work Orders
00013084
00092887
259360
286314
00313485
00313485
00329669
00329669
00403797
00403797
00412785
00427869
00443044
00443925
00448923
00459539
00461042
00466738
00466738
00467103
00467210
00468499
00468499
00471446
00473476
00474060
00475406
00475817
00475818
00475836
00477494
00479744
00479744
00484413
00485527
00490635
00490636
00490727
00490730
00490732
00490733
00490734
00491994
00491994
00496992
00497735
00504777
00507282
51531885
2374132
2580453
2649098
2649105
2653058
2653058
2662931
2662931
2664405
2676925
2696125
2696125
2696239
2696239
2711773
2790888
2800356
2814878
Miscellaneous
2016 General Supervisor Training Plan
2017 General Supervisor Training Plan
2018 General Supervisor Training Plan
Backlog Estimate Spreadsheet and Estimate Scope Summary Sheet
Comprehensive Recovery Plan (CRP) Equipment Reliability Area Action Plan Closure Report,
8/10/2018
CR-PNP-2016-2061, Supervisor Workload Analysis Time Estimates for Recurring and Non-
Recurring Tasks, 9/29/2016
EC-73073, Marotta Scientific Controls Pressure Reducer Valves, Revision 3
EC-72119, Evaluation of Acceptability of Level Selector Switch 640-302
Entergy 3/16/2017 Fleet Memo, 3/16/2017
Entergy Employee Handbook Achieving and Sustaining Excellence, 4/2018
GBM22591, ABB Induced Voltage Test April 2017 Entergy Three Phase Transformer, Revision 1
GSU Transformer Test Report, 5/2015 and 4/2017
INPO 15-011, Principles for Excellence in Integrated Risk Management, Revision 0
Maintenance Backlog Performance Indicator May 2017 through August 2018
Mentor Report of 01/15/18 to 02/15/18
Mentor Report of 02/16/18 to 03/31/18
Mentor Report of 04/01/18 to 05/15/18
Mentor Report of 05/16/18 to 06/30/18
Mentor Report of 09/24/16
Mentor Report of 10/7/16
Mentor Report of 11/30/16
Mentor Report of April 2017
Mentor Report of July 2017
Mentor Report of May 2017
Observation Database, March through August 2018
OFM Meeting Observation 05/30/17
One-on-One Spreadsheets, January through July 2018
PCBT-ADM-PROCTECHREV2018, Procedure Quality Technical Review
PDCR 81-38, HPCI/RCIC Self-Contained Type Pressure Regulating Valves, 10/14/1981
Performance indicators for Scope Survival, Schedule Completion, and Critical Preventive
Maintenance September 2017 through August 2018
Pilgrim NSP Organization Chart, 9/12/2016
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant Work Order Backlog, 8/28/2018
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Comprehensive Recovery Plan, Revision 0
Pilgrim Nuclear Safety Culture Performance Improvement Risk Recognition, Decision Making
and Corrective Action Program, 9/9/2018
PLP-ESPP-RISK2016, PNP 1.3.142 Risk Review & Disposition, Revision 1
PLP-SUPC-DECISION RISK, Risk Recognition and Decision Making Leadership Training
(2017) and Instructor Documents
PM 50079951, 8.C.40 (Sec 8.1) Cold Weather Surv, 2017
PM 50079953, 8.C.40 (Sec 8.3) Warm Weather Surv, 2017
PNP-ENG-All, Email, Engineering Document NE16-007, Assignment of Corrective Actions,
6/13/2016
PNPS 95003 Recovery Metrics, 7/2018
Procedure Quality Briefing Sheet, December 19, 2017, CR-2017, 21117, CA 6
Q2-2017, Program Health Report, Pilgrim Nuclear Station, AOV (KPI) - Air Operated Valve
Program
Q2-2017, Program Health Report, Pilgrim Nuclear Station, APP-J (KPI) - Containment Leakage
Rate and Testing Program (Appendix J)
Q2-2017, Program Health Report, Pilgrim Nuclear Station, FAC - Flow Accelerated Corrosion
Program
Q2-2017, Program Health Report, Pilgrim Nuclear Station, ISI - Inservice Inspection Program
Q2-2017, Program Health Report, Pilgrim Nuclear Station, MOV (KPI) - Motor Operated Valve
Program
Q2-2018, Program Health Report, Pilgrim Nuclear Station, EQ (KPI) - Equipment Qualification
Program
Q2-2018, Program Health Report, Pilgrim Nuclear Station, ISI - Inservice Testing Program
Q4-2017, Program Health Report, Pilgrim Nuclear Station, BPT (KPI) - Buried Piping and Tank
Program
Risk to generation work orders week of 2/26/2018
Roster of Entergy Maintenance technicians 10/2017 and 9/2018
Scope Survival, Scope Completion, Critical PMs deferred, late, and in second half of grace,
January through August 2018
SEP-ISI-PNPS-002, PNPS Fifth Ten-Year Interval Inservice Inspection (ISI/IWE) Program Plan,
Revision 5
SES-2010-09, Simulator Scenario, Revision 4
SES-2014-03, Simulator Scenario, Revision 3
Supply and Demand Model for Maintenance Technicians, 2016 through 2018
SUT CCVT PM Evaluation, September 13, 2018
Targeted Performance Improvement Plans for 14 Managers and Supervisors
Technical Conscience Mentor Weekly Summary Report, Week Ending 2/2/2018
Technical Conscience Mentor Weekly Summary Report, Week Ending 2/9/2018
Technical Conscience Mentor Weekly Summary Report, Week Ending 8/11/2017
Technical Conscience Mentor Weekly Summary Report, Week Ending 8/4/2017
Template for 0705 Engineering Manager Meeting Agenda
Timesheets for contract technicians for the week of August 13, 2018
WT-WTPNP-2016-0207
Confirmatory Action Letter Item Status
Line
Item
Area Action Plan
CAL Item
Inspection Report Number
Closed
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-1.1
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-1.2
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-1.3
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-1.4
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-1.5
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-1.6
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-1.7
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-1.8
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-1.10
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-2.2
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-2.3
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-3.1
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-3.2
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-3.3
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-3.4
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-3.5
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-3.6
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-3.7
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-3.8
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-4.1
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-4.2
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-5.1
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-5.2
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-5.3
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-5.4
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-6.1
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-7.1
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-8.1
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-8.6
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-8.8
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-8.9
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-8.10
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-8.21
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-8.22
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-8.25
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-8.26
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-8.27
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-8.28
Nuclear Safety Culture
NSC-8.29
Corrective Action Program
CAP-1.1
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-1.2
Y
Line
Item
Area Action Plan
CAL Item
Inspection Report Number
Closed
Corrective Action Program
CAP-1.3
Reviewed - 05000293/2018011
And 05000293/2018012
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-1.4
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-1.5
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-1.7
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-1.8
Reviewed - 05000293/2018011
And 05000293/2018012
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-1.9
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-1.10
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-1.11
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-2.1
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-2.2
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-2.3
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-3.1
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-3.2
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-4.2
Y
Corrective Action Program
CAP-4.3
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-1.1
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-1.2
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-1.3
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-1.4
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-1.6
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-2.2
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-2.3
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-2.4
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-2.5
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-3.1
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-3.2
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-3.3
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-3.4
Y
Line
Item
Area Action Plan
CAL Item
Inspection Report Number
Closed
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-4.1
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-4.2
Reviewed - 05000293/2018011
N
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-4.3
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-5.1
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-5.2
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-5.7
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-5.8
Y
Procedure Use and
Adherence
PUA-5.9
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
1.1
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
1.2
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
1.3
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
1.4
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
1.5
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
1.6
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
2.2
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
3.1
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
5.1
Y
Line
Item
Area Action Plan
CAL Item
Inspection Report Number
Closed
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
5.2
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
5.3
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
5.4
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
5.5
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
5.6
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
5.7
Y
and Functionality
Assessments
ODFA-
5.8
Y
Operations Department
Standards and Leadership
OPS-1.1
Y
Operations Department
Standards and Leadership
OPS-1.2
Y
Operations Department
Standards and Leadership
OPS-1.4
Y
Operations Department
Standards and Leadership
OPS-1.6
Y
Operations Department
Standards and Leadership
OPS-1.7
Y
Operations Department
Standards and Leadership
OPS-2.2
Y
100
Operations Department
Standards and Leadership
OPS-3.1
Y
101
Operations Department
Standards and Leadership
OPS-3.2
Y
2
Operations Department
Standards and Leadership
OPS-4.1
Y
103
Operations Department
Standards and Leadership
OPS-4.2
Y
104
Risk Recognition and
Decision Making
RRDM-
1.1
Y
Line
Item
Area Action Plan
CAL Item
Inspection Report Number
Closed
105
Risk Recognition and
Decision Making
RRDM-
1.2
Y
106
Risk Recognition and
Decision Making
RRDM-
1.3
Y
107
Risk Recognition and
Decision Making
RRDM-
2.1
Y
108
Risk Recognition and
Decision Making
RRDM-
3.1
Y
109
Risk Recognition and
Decision Making
RRDM-
3.2
Y
110
Risk Recognition and
Decision Making
RRDM-
3.3
Y
111
Risk Recognition and
Decision Making
RRDM-
4.3
Y
2
Risk Recognition and
Decision Making
RRDM-
4.8
Y
113
Risk Recognition and
Decision Making
RRDM-
4.9
Y
114
Procedure Quality
PQ-1.1
Reviewed - 05000293/2017010
And 05000293/2018012
Y
115
Procedure Quality
PQ-2.1
Y
116
Procedure Quality
PQ-2.2
Y
117
Procedure Quality
PQ-3.1
Y
118
Procedure Quality
PQ-3.2
Y
119
Procedure Quality
PQ-3.3
Y
20
Procedure Quality
PQ-5.1
Y
21
Procedure Quality
PQ-5.2
Reviewed - 05000293/2017010
And 05000293/2018012
Y
2
SRV White Finding
SRV-1.1
Y
23
SRV White Finding
SRV-1.2
Y
24
SRV White Finding
SRV-1.3
Y
25
SRV White Finding
SRV-2.1
Y
26
SRV White Finding
SRV-3.1
Y
27
SRV White Finding
SRV-3.2
Y
28
SRV White Finding
SRV-3.3
Y
29
SRV White Finding
SRV-3.4
Y
130
SRV White Finding
SRV-4.1
Y
131
SRV White Finding
SRV-5.1
Y
2
SRV White Finding
SRV-5.2
Y
133
Engineering Programs
Y
134
Engineering Programs
Y
135
Engineering Programs
Y
136
Engineering Programs
Y
137
Engineering Programs
Y
Line
Item
Area Action Plan
CAL Item
Inspection Report Number
Closed
138
Engineering Programs
Y
139
Engineering Programs
Y
140
Engineering Programs
Y
141
Equipment Reliability
ER-1.1
Y
2
Equipment Reliability
ER-1.2
Y
143
Equipment Reliability
ER-1.3
Y
144
Equipment Reliability
ER-2.1
Y
145
Equipment Reliability
ER-2.2
Y
146
Equipment Reliability
ER-3.1
Y
147
Equipment Reliability
ER-3.2
Y
148
Equipment Reliability
ER-3.3
Y
149
Work Management
WM-1.1
Y
150
Work Management
WM-1.2
Y
151
Work Management
WM-1.3
Y
2
Work Management
WM-2.1
Y
153
Work Management
WM-2.2
Y
154
Work Management
WM-3.1
Y
155
Work Management
WM-3.3
Y
156
Work Management
WM-4.2
Y