IR 05000244/1993019

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Info Re Exam Results & Planned Remedial Actions Re Training Program Insp Rept 50-244/93-19
ML17263A476
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/12/1993
From: Mecredy R
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To: Bettenhausen L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
NUDOCS 9312020381
Download: ML17263A476 (5)


Text

g;;"/iY" uuuIuurrIuuu~uuuuur ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION

~~~~r~0)~89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N.K 14649.0001 ROBERT C MECREDY Vice Prerldent Cinne Nuclear Production November 12, 1993 TE~~AREACODE Tie 546 2700 Mr.Lee Bettenhausen Operations Branch Chief Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1~w 475 Allendale Rd.King of Prussia, PA 19446 I r , r r-.SUBJECT: Examination Results and Planned Remedial Action'I REFERENCE:

Training Program Xhspection Report NO.50-244/93-19 I Dear Mr.Bettenhausen 0 As required by the Systems Approach to Training (SAT), Rochester Gas&Electric Corporation (RG&E)has reviewed operator perfor-mance on the RG&E administered 1993 Annual.Operator examination for areas of training process improvement.

These areas were discussed at the RG&E and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)meeting held on October 26th at the Region 1 office and were included as attachments to the referenced report.All licensed operators that=did not successfully complete the program requirements on this exam were immediately removed from shift.The License Review Board, composed of management and supervision from both the training and line organizations, reviewed each operator's performance.

The Board also directed that a root cause analysis (RCA)be conducted to determine the reason(s)for repeat failures as well as the number of failures.The Board looked at each individual's performance on all weekly quizzes, annual exams, and simulator evaluations.

Using this information, indiv'dua remedial programs were established for each operator.The remedial programs constructed included classroom sessions, self study exercises, simulator time and management interviews.

Operators identified as repeat failures warranted additional attention.

A diagnostic test constructed per the Examiner Standards (NUREG 1021)was given to ensure that each operator possessed a knowledge level which met the minimum requirements of NUREG 1021.Test results were also"used to determine additional weak areas which should be included in the individual remediatiop programs.These operators also participated in a"Learning Styles Xnventory" consisting of a number of testing instruments adminis-tered by an educational psychologist.

The results of this inventory will become part of the long term program to modify training material, as needed, to ensure that they receive the maximum benefits of training.Following remediation, individuals were returned to licensed duties.The RCA identified causes for'=-static-exam'failures and Reactor Operator (RO)written exam failures.Recommendations to prevent recurrence included an RO specific written exam, better validation of exam material, improved reference"material availability and written exam structure.

Other recommendations for overall program improvement are included as attachments to the referenced report.RG&E is committed to training derived from an SAT ,process..

Results from this exam are viewed as part of RG&E's continuous training process improvement.

Both plant and training management will be-implementing the short and long term recommendations to maximize the training benefits for the operators.

Xf there are any further questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel free to call Gary Meier at 716-724-6622.

Ve truly yours, Robert C.Mecredy XC: G.Meier FORD I 0 05000244 S/F NOTES: License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR21 2.109(V/19/72).

COPIES LTTR ENCL REC IP IENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-3 PD COPIES LTTR FNCL RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME JOHNSON1 A R EGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (R IDS)I 1 ACCESSION NBR: 9312020381 DOC.DATE: 93/11/12 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET 0 FACIL 50 244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant/Unit 11 Rochester G 05000244 t AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY/R.C.Rochester Gas 5 Electric Corp.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION BETTENH*USENI L.Region 1 (Post 820201)SUBJECT: Discusses info re exam results 5 planned remedial actions T e training program insp rept 50-244/'73-19.

DISTRIBUTION CODE.IEOID COPIES RECEIVED;LTR I ENCL Q SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response INTERNAL: AEOD/DEIB AEOD/DSP/TPAB DEDRO NRR/DRCH/HHFB NRR/DRSS/PEPB NRR/PMAS/ILPB2

~6~R~t EIREG=.F=ILEIEE 02 RGN1 FILE 01 EXTERNAL: EQ8cG/BRYCE1J.

H.NSIC AEOD/DSP/ROAB AEOD/TTC NRR/DORS/OEAB NRR/DRIL/RPEB NRR/PMAS/ILPB1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDSi RES/HFB NRC PDR NOTE TO ALL RIDS RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK.ROOM PI-~7 (EXT.504-2065)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION ber 12, 1993

SUBJECT:

Examination Results and Planned Remedial Action REFElKNCE:

Training Program Ihspection Report NO.50-244/93-19

Dear Mr.Bettenhausen As required by the Systems Approach to Training (SAT), Rochester Gas&Electric Corporation (RG&E)has reviewed operator perfor-mance on the RG&E administered 1993 Annual Operator examination for areas of training process improvement.

These areas were discussed at the RG&E and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)meeting held on October 26th at the Region 1 office and were included as attachments to the referenced report.All licensed operators that did not successfully complete the program requirements on this exam were immediately removed from shift.The License Review Board, composed of management and supervision from both the training and line organizations, reviewed each operator's performance.

The Board also directed that a root cause analysis (RCA)be conducted to determine the reason(s)for repeat failures as well as the number of failures.The Board looked at each individual's performance on all weekly quizzes, annual exams, and simulator evaluations.

Using this in ormation, individua remedial programs were established for, each operator.The remedial programs constructed included classroom sessions, self study exercises, simulator time and management interviews.

Operators identified as repeat failures warranted additional attention.

A diagnostic test constructed per the Examiner Standards (NUREG 1021)was given to ensure that each operator possessed a knowledge level which met the minimum requirements of NUREG 1021.Test results were also used to determine additional weak areas which should be included in the individual remediation programs.These operators also participated in a"Learning Styles Inventory" consisting of a number of testing instruments adminis-tered.by an educational psychologist.

The results of this inventory will become part of the long term program to modify training 09 93i202038i 93iii2 PDR ADOCK 05000244 C PDR material, as needed, to ensure that they receive the maximum benefits of training.Following remediation, individuals were returned to licensed duties.The RCA identified causes for static exam failures and Reactor Operator (RO)written exam failures.Recommendations to prevent recurrence included an RO specific written exam, better validation of exam material, improved reference material availability and written exam structure.

Other recommendations for overall program improvement are included as attachments to the referenced report.RG&E is committed to training derived from an SAT process.Results from this exam are viewed as part of RG&E's continuous training process improvement.

Both plant and training management will be implementing the short and long term recommendations to maximize the training benefits for the operators.

If there are any further questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel free to call Gary Meier at 716-724-6622.

V e truly yours, Robert C.Mecredy XC: G.Meier