IR 05000010/1975017
| ML19340A543 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 01/09/1976 |
| From: | Fiorelli G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Brian Lee COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19340A544 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008270803 | |
| Download: ML19340A543 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _
_
__
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
e2 3 4:)
- .
'
d
,
,
UNITED STA fES g
f NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION 111 799 ROOSEVELT RO AD CLEN ELLYN. ILLINOl$ 60137
- 1 JAlt
.8 1976-l
-
...--
,
.
Desket No.'~5 E E Commenrealth Edison Company ATDis Mr. Byron Las, Jr.
Docket No. 50-237 Vise President Docket No. 50-249 P. O. Box 767 i
Chisago, Illinois 60690 Gentlemen This acknowledges your latter dated December 23, 1975, informing us of the stepe you have taken to cerr a t the items of someomp14==== which we brought to your attention in our letter dated Desember 1, 1975.
Your response to Deficianay B.1 discussed planned procedure i
e.
te to ensure proper future recording of fuel cask temperature data, but did not address the recording of fuel cask leak test data. As discussed by telephone with Mr. B. B. Stephensen on January 6, 1976, we understand that
-
presedure improvements are planned whiah will ensure proper recording of eask leak test data during future fuel shipment activities.
You also indicated in your letter that nonsampliance should not be associated with items 2, 3, and 4 of Infraction A.2.
While you indicate estemaating circienstanees existed, Infraction A.2 related to surve111anse sheeks which were prematurely signed off as completa wham in fast portions of the test still remained to be completed. Your corrective actions indicate a mothed er system will be developed to f
assure esopletten of the emitted portians of tests prier to pisat startup.
l With respost to Deficiency B.3, your letter stated that " full complianse with Technical Spesifications requirements was achieved without the cheek of eardinal points." This state-meat may be valid insofar as spesif ts calibration requirements in the Technical Spesifiestions are conce ned8 however, it is considered not applicable in light of the posedure require-meats of Section 6.2.A of the Teebnical Specifications. The inspector's observation was that, contrary to Section 6.2. A, i
D "
]D 0 9@
P owM b A.1 A LL
, 4,
_
.
g kg I
8008270
.
.. ~
.
.
.
.
Commonwealth Edison-2-
-
Cs=Pany
,
the surveillance test was reviewed and signed off as complete when all stape of the approved procedure had act been performed, nor had a procedura reviaton been loseed as required. Your identified correctiva astians indisate that appropriata procedure changes will be made.
The above scuanents are presented for clarifisation. We will
'
er==ina these matters during a future inspection.
Your coopsration with we is appresisted.
Sinserely yours, Casten Fiore111, Chiaf Reactor Operaticas and m,1 mar Support Branch
.
cc B. B. Stephensen Station Superintandant bec w/ltr dtd 12/23/75:
PDR Local PDR NSIC TIC Anthony Roisman, Esq.
mmD
- D #
.d-es s
m
--
. -.