05000461/FIN-2011004-03
From kanterella
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | Failure to Correct a Condition Adverse to Quality for Improperly Implemented Engineering Corrective Actions |
| Description | The inspectors identified a finding of very low safety significance due to the licensees failure to effectively implement corrective actions for a condition adverse to quality described in Apparent Cause Evaluation 1095413, NOS [Nuclear Oversight] Identifies Improperly Implemented Engineering Corrective Actions Cause Repeat Operational Challenges. No violation of regulatory requirements was identified. The licensee entered this issue into its corrective action program to investigate the cause and to identify appropriate corrective actions. The finding was of more than minor significance because it was associated with the Equipment Performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone and directly affected the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. Specifically, improperly implemented engineering corrective actions could result in additional repeat operational equipment challenges. The finding was of very low safety significance because the issue: (1) was not a design or qualification deficiency; (2) did not represent an actual loss of safety function of a system; (3) did not represent an actual loss of safety function of a single train for greater than its Technical Specification (TS) allowed outage time; (4) did not represent an actual loss of safety function of one or more non-TS trains of equipment designated as risk significant; and (5) did not screen as potentially risk significant due to a seismic, flooding, or severe weather initiating event. The inspectors concluded that this finding affected the cross-cutting area of problem identification and resolution. Specifically, the licensee failed to take appropriate corrective actions to address known deficiencies in its process for tracking and closing work orders that implement corrective actions. The actions taken were neither lasting nor effective. |
| Site: | Clinton  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000461/2011004 Section 4OA2 |
| Date counted | Sep 30, 2011 (2011Q3) |
| Type: | Finding: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | B Kemker D Lords J Cassidy J Draper M Ring R Langstaff S Bell S Mischke V Myersb Kemkerd Lords D Passehl J Beavers J Bozga J Draper M Ring R Ruiz S Mischke |
| CCA | P.3, Resolution |
| INPO aspect | PI.3 |
| ' | |
Finding - Clinton - IR 05000461/2011004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Clinton) @ 2011Q3
Self-Identified List (Clinton)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||