text
.-.
,~,
. ~.. - ~ - -
-.. - ~.
0-J Wisconsin Electnc
{
POWER COMPANY 231 W Michgan. PO Box 2046, Mdwoukee, Wt 53201 2046 (414)221-2345 NPL 97-0186 1
f April 18,1997 e
Document Control Desk US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- - Mail Station PI-137 Washington, DC 20555 i
l i
Gentlemen:
DOCKET 50-266 AND 50-301 i.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 97-014-00 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM INOPERABILITY l
DUE TO LOSS OF INSTRUMENT AIR
^
?
POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT. UNITS 1 AND 2
}
- - Enclosed is Licensee Event Report 97-014-00 for Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2. This report i
is provided in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), "Any event or condition that alone could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems that are needed to mitigate the consequences of an accident." This report describes a plant condition in which the Auxiliary Feedwater
. System may not have been able to perform as analyzed due to a loss ofinstrument air to the motor-driven 4
AFW l Pump flow control valves.
If you require additional information, please contact us.
j Sincerely,
[
Douglas F. Johnson Manager - Regulatory Services i
and Licensing i
I GDA
\\
hN g
Enclosure
. cc:
NRC Resident Inspector NRC Regional Administrator lIlllllllllllU!@
9704220315 970418 PDR ADOCK 05000266-S PDR,
A subsWayofIGrrash Exyrmwathw
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REaVLATORY COMMIS$10N APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0 604 (4-95)
EXPIRES 04/30/98 ESTIMAYED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
REPORTEt, LESSONS LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE UCENSING PROCESS AND FED BACK TO INDUSTRY.
FORWARD Cof4/lENTS REGARDING (See reverse for required number of BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION AND dioits/ characters for each block)
RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (T-6 F33).
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COE11SSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
PAGE (3)
Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 05000266 1 OF 6 TITLE (4)
Auxiliary Feedwater System Inoperability Due To Loss of Instrument Air EVENT DATE (5)
LER NUMBEP.(6)
REPORT DATE (7)
OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8) l YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER YEAR NUMBER NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR PBNP Unit 2 05000301 MONTH DAY l
FACluTY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 03 21 l 97 97 014 -
00 04 18 97 05000 OPERATING l THl3 REPORT is SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR O (Check one or more)(11)
MODE (9)
N l 202201(b) 202203(ax2xv) 0.73(a)(2)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)
POWER l
202203(a)(1) 202203(a)(3)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(x)
LEVEL (10) 1000 l 20.2203(a)(2)(1) 20.2203(a)(3xii) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 73.71
,IfC '
20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a)(4) 50.73(a)(2)(iv)
OTHER s,;
i 20 2203(a)(2)(in) 50.36(c)(1)
X 233(ax2xv) smov in Aosmi new
$$ik&dit.M b.
202203(ax2xiv) 2.36(ex2) x w13(ex2xvh) or in NRC Form 366A LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (include Area Code)
Glenn D. Adams, Licensing Engineer (414) 221-4691 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMDONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABL TO NPRDS E TO NPROS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)
EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR YES SUBMISSION (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).
x NO DATE (15)
ABSTRACT (Umit to 1400 spaces,i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewntten lines) (16)
On March 21, 1997, with Unit 1 in cold shutdown and Unit 2 in a defueled condition, licensee engineers discovered a condition that alone could have prevented the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System from automatically performing its safety-related function during design basis accidents involving a loss of instrument air and reduced steam generator pressures.
A loss of instrument air during the accident would cause both motor-driven AFW pump (MDAFWP) flow control valves to fail open.
Without automatic flow control, the MDAFWPs' flowrate would be determined by steam generator pressure.
If steam generator pressure is below the relief valve setpoints, which may occur for a low decay heat history, the pump motor breakers could trip on time-overcurrent.
After discovery of these conditions, the AFW System was declared inoperable and the design was evaluated.
The existing plant conditions did not require operability of the AFW system.
The AFW system will be restored to operable status prior to establishing conditions that would require the system to be operable.
The potential loss of both MDAFWPs during certain accidents has been attributed to a latent design characteristic of the original design of the AFW system.
a NoC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION s
3 FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3) i YEAR SEQUEN TIAL REVISION Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 05000266 NUMBER NUMBER 2 OF 6 97 014 00 i
TEXT (11more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 36bA) (17)
Event Description
At 1800 CST on March 21, 1997, with Unit 1 in cold shutdown and Unit 2 in a defueled condition, licensee engineers discovered a cotdition that alone could have prevented the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System from automatically performing its safety-related function during certain design basis accidents involving a loss of instrument air and reduced steam generator pressures.
The loss of instrument air, which may be caused by a loss of offsite power, would cause both motor-driven AFW pump (MDAFWP) flow control valves to fail open.
Without automatic flow control, the MDAFWPs' flowrate would be determined by steam generator pressure and feed line flow resistance.
If steam generator pressure is below the relief valve setpoints, which may occur for a low decay heat history, the pump motor breakers could trip on time-overcurrent.
Also, the loss of instrument air would disable the remote-manual capability to control AFW flowrate from the main control board.
Immediately following discovery of these conditions, the AFW system was declared inoperable.
The existing plant conditions did not require operability of the AFW system.
Soon after discovery of these conditia s, an AFW System design basis evaluation was initiated to ascertain those design basis accidents that would be most affected by this sequence of events.
That design basis evaluation determined that any event involving a loss of offsite power (LOOP) could lead to the eventual loss of the MDAFWPs, but that the main steamline break (MSLB) accident would present the most-limiting conditions.
During a MSLB, one steam generator may blowdown at the maximum rate.
The MDAFWP feeding the faulted steam generator would probably trip on low suction pressure.
If the turbine-driven AFW pump fails to operate (i.e.,
the single active failure), then the requirement to maintain steam generator inventory would rely on the performance of the remaining MDAFWP.
The. rapid cooldown of the reactor coolant system (RCS) would rapidly reduce the pressure of the intact steam generator to approximately 600 psig.
The reduced pressure (below the steam generator relief valve setpoint) could result in the eventual tripping of the remaining MDAFWP on time-overcurrent.
In this case, and other less-limiting cases where the MDAFWP(s) could trip later in the accident, manual action would be necessary to ensure adequate inventory in the steam generators.
The IEEE Standard 803A-1983 component identifiers for this report are:
Pump -
(p) 52 - Circuit Breaker, AC Valve -
(V)
PCV -Pressure Control Valve
~
NRC FORM 386A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4 95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (65 PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 05000266 NUMBER NUMBER 3 OF 6 97 014 00 2
TEXT lit more space is requWed, use additenal copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)
Component and System Description:
As described in the PBNP FSAR, the AFW System supplies high-pressure feedwater to the steam generators to maintain a water inventory for removal of heat energy from the reactor coolant system by secondary side steam release in the event of inoperability of the main feedwater system.
Redundant supplies are provided by using two pumping systems, using different sources of power for the pumps.
One system uses a turbine-driven pump capable of providing 200 gpm to each steam generator in the associated unit.
The other system uses two motor-driven pumps which are sharad between the two nuclear units, and capable of providing at least 100 gym to each of the steam generators alig."ed to its discharge.
Therefore, each unit is served by three AFW pumps; two motor-driven and one turbine-driven.
Each motor-driven AFW pump is dedicated to feeding one steam generator in eithe unit automatically.
The turbine-driven AFW pump feeds both steam generators in one unit.
When an AFW actuation signal occurs, the AFW system is designed and analyzed to automatically provide emergency feedwater to the affected unit's steam generators within one minute of the actuation signal.
The turbine-driven pump's discharge flowpath is normally open, and the flow-rate is limited by normally throttled MOVs 1/2AF-4000 and -4001.
These MOVs do not receive an automatic signal for an AFW actuation.
Therefore, if aligned, there are no active motor-operated valves in the turbine-driven AFW pump's discharge flowpath.
The motor-driven pump's discharge flowpath is isolated by normally closed MOVs that automatically open to the affected unit's steam generators.
Also, the discharge pressure from each motor-driven pump is controlled by 3
an air-operated control valve designated AF-4012 (for pump P-38A) and AF-4019 (for pump P-38B).
These control valves will regulate upstream pressure to a setpoint established by a hand-controller in the main control room.
Under normal operating conditions, the setting is approximately 1200 psig, which correlates to a pump flowrate of approximately 200 gallons per minute (gpm); the design point of the pump.
The control valves are supplied with instrument air.
By design, the control valves will travel to the full open position for a loss of instrument air or power to the operating controllers.
Upon a loss of offsite power, the instrument air compressors are stripped and are not automatically re-energized.
Therefore, any plant accident coincident with a loss of offsite power will result in the control valves failing to the full open position.
The loss of instrument air will also disable the hand-controller on the main control board.
Therefore, the flowrate of the MDAFW pumps will be determined by the steam generator pressure during the event, unless local-manual control of the control valve can be taken.
NRC FORM ?66A (4-95) m
3
~_
,U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4 95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILl1Y NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6) l PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION l Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 05000266 NUMBER NUMBER l 4 OF 6 97 014 00 l
TEXT (11 more space is requked, use additional copies of NRC Form 366Al (11)
If emergency diesel generator loading allows, there is a procedural provision to load an IA compressor during an accident.
This action would restore automatic operation of the control valve at the setting provided on the main control board.
The motor-drivers for AFW pumps P-38A and P-38B are provided with time-overcurrent devices which prevent overheating of the motor and cable at values of current that exceed the long-term current rating, but are less than the instantaneous trip setting that is indicative of a motor fault or stall.
When the MDAFWPs operate at approximately 200 gpm (their nominal design operating point), the time-overcurrent settings are not broached.
However, when the MDAFWPs operate at a flowrate greater than 200 gpm, the time-overcurrent settings may be broached and lead to a motor breaker trip after the prescribed time passes.
Ccuse:
The postulated event scenario is the result of a latent characteristic of the original AFW system design.
Previous analyses of this scenario have considered that the steam generator pressure at the safety valve settings would limit MDAFW flow to approximately 200 gpm.
However, the steam generator pressure would be maintained at the safety valve settings only when those accidents occurred with the maximum decay heat conditions described in FSAR Chapter 14.
For less-limiting decay heat conditions, the actual steam generator pressure would be reduced below the safety valve settings.
Also, it is evident that the original design took credit for operator action to control MDAFW pump flowrate to the nominal 200 gpm value.
There was not any documented basis for assuming the capability to restore flow control within a short period of time.
However, the original design did have provisions for restoring instrument air following a LOOP, and it did provide the capability to reset a MDAFWP from the control room if the breaker did happen to trip on time-overcurrent.
The original design basis did not specifically analyze the capability of the operating crew to take local-manual control for all events and preclude the loss of the MDAFWPs.
Therefore, the original design did not provide ample assurance that the MDAFWPs would automatically function during all design basis events.
Corrective Actions
A design evaluation was initiated following the discovery of the I condition.
Design modifications have been initiated to provide a reliable pneumatic supply to the control valves.
These design modifica tions, or another appropriate remedy, will be completed to restore AFW System operability prior to exceeding 350 *F during the startup of either Unit 1 or Unit 2.
d
, NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR RE;ULATORY COMMIS510N (4-95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACiOTY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6 i
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 05000266 NWBER NWBER 5 OF 6 l
97 014 00 TEKT (11more space It required, use addt:Kmalcopies of NRC form 366A) (17}
RIportability:
A 4-hour report per 10 CFR 50.72 (b) (2) (i) was made to the NRC duty officer at 1800 CST on March 21, 1997.
This Licensee Event Report is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (v) (D), "Any event or condition that alone could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or 4
systems that are needed to mitigate the consequences of an accident" and
- 50. 73 (a) (2) (vii), "Any event where a' single cause or condition caused two independent trains to become inoperable in a single system designed to mitigate the consequences of an accident."
Snfety Assessment:
As mentioned above, the limiting conditions may occur during a MSLB event I
with the failure of a turbine-driven AFW pump.
The rapid cooldown of the reactor coolant system (RCS) and the resulting low pressure in the operating steam generator could result in eventual tripping of the remaining MDAFWP on time overcurrent.
In this case, and other less-limiting cases where the MDAFWP(s) could trip later in the accident, manual action would be necessary to ensure adequate inventory in the steam generators.
The capability to restore AFW operation within an acceptable amount of time is based on the following factors:
1.
Prior to exceeding the time-overcurrent trip settings that would result in a motor breaker trip, manual action could be taken to reduce MDAFWP flowrate by closing one of the discharge motor-operated valves (MOVs) or the pump could be secured from the control room and restarted as necessary.
2.
If operator staffing allows, an operator could take local-manual control of the MDAFWP flow and preclude a motor breaker trip.
3.
If a MDAFWP were to trip on time-overcurrent, the breaker may be reset and the pump restarted from the control room.
1 4.
The turbine-driven AFW pump (TDAFWP) operates independently of the instrument air system, and would not be affected by the loss of offsite power or the potential loss of instrument air.
The historically high reliability (i.e.,
low unavailability) of the PBNP TDAFWPs provides reasonable assurance that sufficient AFW would be
- - available to the steam generators, even with event scenario described in this report.
Another mitigating factor in these scenarios is that the initial MDAFWP flowrate above the nominal design basis value (i.e.,
greater than 200 gpm used in the accident analyses) will inherently provide a reserve steam generator inventory that would provide additional time to manually restore the AFW System.
~
]
.U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (6 95)
LICEhi.E EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6' PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 05000266 NUMBER NUMBER 6 OF 6 j 97 014 00 TEXT litinore space is requWed, use additional copies of NRC form 366Al (11)
Similar Occurrences:
Latent design flaws in the original design that affected the capability of safety-related equipment were reported in the following LERs:
LER
Description
266/97-006-00 Potential Refueling Cavity Drain Failure Could Affect Accident Mitigation 266/97-001-00 Safety Injecticn Delay Times Exceed Design Basis Values 266/96-005-00 Potential Service Water Flashing in Containment Fan Coolers
)
'.)
I
)
l 1- -
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000266/LER-1997-001, :on 970108,safety Injection Delay Times Exceeded Design Basis Values.Caused by Degraded Voltage Conditions.Licensee Engineers Will Prepare FSAR Change Requests to Reflect LBLOCA Evaluation |
- on 970108,safety Injection Delay Times Exceeded Design Basis Values.Caused by Degraded Voltage Conditions.Licensee Engineers Will Prepare FSAR Change Requests to Reflect LBLOCA Evaluation
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000301/LER-1997-001, Forwards LER 97-001-00,re Containment Structure Where Internal Containment Structural Members Could Have Damaged Containment Liner During Safe Shutdown Earthquake | Forwards LER 97-001-00,re Containment Structure Where Internal Containment Structural Members Could Have Damaged Containment Liner During Safe Shutdown Earthquake | | | 05000301/LER-1997-001-01, :on 970107,containment Liner Clearance Was Not IAW Plant Design Basis.Caused by Void Between Containment Liner & Concrete Containment Structure.Inspected Containment |
- on 970107,containment Liner Clearance Was Not IAW Plant Design Basis.Caused by Void Between Containment Liner & Concrete Containment Structure.Inspected Containment
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000266/LER-1997-002, :on 970109,potential to Overpressurize Piping Between Containment Isolation Valves Occurred.Caused by Original Design Not Providing Overpressure Protection for Piping.Review Completed |
- on 970109,potential to Overpressurize Piping Between Containment Isolation Valves Occurred.Caused by Original Design Not Providing Overpressure Protection for Piping.Review Completed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000301/LER-1997-002-01, :on 970415,potential Reactor Coolant Sys Branch Connection Stresses Beyond Design Basis,Indicated.Caused by Mod Initiated to Remove RTD Bypass Line Isolation Valves. Stress Analysis Conducted on RTD Bypass Piping |
- on 970415,potential Reactor Coolant Sys Branch Connection Stresses Beyond Design Basis,Indicated.Caused by Mod Initiated to Remove RTD Bypass Line Isolation Valves. Stress Analysis Conducted on RTD Bypass Piping
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000266/LER-1997-003, :on 970109,did Not Perform Leak Test on Spare Containment Penetrations Per Ts.Caused by Lack of Routine Testing.Tested Penetrations W/Satisfactory Results |
- on 970109,did Not Perform Leak Test on Spare Containment Penetrations Per Ts.Caused by Lack of Routine Testing.Tested Penetrations W/Satisfactory Results
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000301/LER-1997-004-01, :on 970729,declared RHR Loop Inoperable Due to CCW Leak.Caused by Failure of RHR Heat Exchanger CCW Piping. Repaired Piping & Declared RHR Loop Operable |
- on 970729,declared RHR Loop Inoperable Due to CCW Leak.Caused by Failure of RHR Heat Exchanger CCW Piping. Repaired Piping & Declared RHR Loop Operable
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000266/LER-1997-004, :on 970113,potential for Particular Common Mode Failure That Could Affect Opposite Trains of Unit 2 Safeguards Equipment Was Noted.Caused by Lack of Physical Separation.Replaced Subject Circuit Breakers |
- on 970113,potential for Particular Common Mode Failure That Could Affect Opposite Trains of Unit 2 Safeguards Equipment Was Noted.Caused by Lack of Physical Separation.Replaced Subject Circuit Breakers
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000301/LER-1997-005-01, :on 970806,RHR Pump Was Declared Inoperable Due to Abnormal Seal Leakage from Loop a RHR 2P-10A.Repaired RHR Pump |
- on 970806,RHR Pump Was Declared Inoperable Due to Abnormal Seal Leakage from Loop a RHR 2P-10A.Repaired RHR Pump
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000266/LER-1997-005, :on 970116,1SI-852A Was Not Tested IAW Inservice Test Program Required by Tss.Caused Because Condition Revealed That Valve 1SI-852A Had Not Been Completely Tested.Tests Will Be Reviewed |
- on 970116,1SI-852A Was Not Tested IAW Inservice Test Program Required by Tss.Caused Because Condition Revealed That Valve 1SI-852A Had Not Been Completely Tested.Tests Will Be Reviewed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000266/LER-1997-006, :on 970120,refueling Cavity Drain Failed During Loca.Caused by Inadequate Evaluation of Original Design.Design of Refueling Cavity Drains Was Revised with Respect Capability to Withstand an Earthquake |
- on 970120,refueling Cavity Drain Failed During Loca.Caused by Inadequate Evaluation of Original Design.Design of Refueling Cavity Drains Was Revised with Respect Capability to Withstand an Earthquake
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000266/LER-1997-007, :on 970124,determined That Potential Existed for EDG Overload Condition.Caused by Failure to Recognize This Condition When Plants Initially Licensed W/Two Edgs. Implemented Procedure Changes |
- on 970124,determined That Potential Existed for EDG Overload Condition.Caused by Failure to Recognize This Condition When Plants Initially Licensed W/Two Edgs. Implemented Procedure Changes
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000266/LER-1997-008, :on 970131,non-seismic Ductwork Located Above safety-related Equipment in Containment Occurred.Caused by Incomplete Seismic Evaluation.Mods Will Be Completed During Current Unit 2 Refueling Outage |
- on 970131,non-seismic Ductwork Located Above safety-related Equipment in Containment Occurred.Caused by Incomplete Seismic Evaluation.Mods Will Be Completed During Current Unit 2 Refueling Outage
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000266/LER-1997-009, :on 970214,potential for Safety Injection Failure During Filling of Safety Injection Accumulator Discovered.Caused by Situation Not Adequately Covered by Procedures.Procedure OI-100 Revised |
- on 970214,potential for Safety Injection Failure During Filling of Safety Injection Accumulator Discovered.Caused by Situation Not Adequately Covered by Procedures.Procedure OI-100 Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000266/LER-1997-010, :on 970219,svc Water & Component Cooling Water TS Action Requirements Were Not Met.Caused Because Licensee Did Not Comply W/Cold Shutdown Requirements of TS 15.3.3.C.2 & 15.3.3.D.2.Evaluations Were Performed |
- on 970219,svc Water & Component Cooling Water TS Action Requirements Were Not Met.Caused Because Licensee Did Not Comply W/Cold Shutdown Requirements of TS 15.3.3.C.2 & 15.3.3.D.2.Evaluations Were Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000266/LER-1997-011, :on 970305,containment Fan Cooler Accident Fans Were Not Tested in Accordance with Tss.Caused by non-conservative Interpretation of Literal Requirements of Tss.Unit 1 & 2 Accident Fans Were Tested |
- on 970305,containment Fan Cooler Accident Fans Were Not Tested in Accordance with Tss.Caused by non-conservative Interpretation of Literal Requirements of Tss.Unit 1 & 2 Accident Fans Were Tested
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000266/LER-1997-012, :on 970304,diesel-drive Fire Pump Day Tank Not Sampled IAW TSs.Non-conservative Interpretation of TS Led to Failure.Day Tank T-30 Sample Was Drawn & Analyzed W/Satisfactory Results |
- on 970304,diesel-drive Fire Pump Day Tank Not Sampled IAW TSs.Non-conservative Interpretation of TS Led to Failure.Day Tank T-30 Sample Was Drawn & Analyzed W/Satisfactory Results
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000266/LER-1997-013, :on 970304,CCWS Found Not in Accordance W/ Plant Design Basis.Caused by Inoperable Valve Due to Overtorquing in Closed position.Cross-tie Will Be Resolved |
- on 970304,CCWS Found Not in Accordance W/ Plant Design Basis.Caused by Inoperable Valve Due to Overtorquing in Closed position.Cross-tie Will Be Resolved
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000266/LER-1997-013-01, Forwards Suppl LER 97-013-01,re Component Cooling Water Sys Not IAW Plant Design Basis.Rept Replaces LER 97-013-00 in Its Entirety & Includes Addl Similar Occurrence Not Previously Reported to NRC | Forwards Suppl LER 97-013-01,re Component Cooling Water Sys Not IAW Plant Design Basis.Rept Replaces LER 97-013-00 in Its Entirety & Includes Addl Similar Occurrence Not Previously Reported to NRC | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000266/LER-1997-014, :on 970321,auxiliary Feedwater Sys Inoperability Due to Loss of Instrument Air.Design Mods Initiated,Providing Pneumatic Supply to Control Valves |
- on 970321,auxiliary Feedwater Sys Inoperability Due to Loss of Instrument Air.Design Mods Initiated,Providing Pneumatic Supply to Control Valves
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000266/LER-1997-015, :on 970324,control Room Ventilation Sys Declared Inoperable Due to Failures of Backdraft Damper & Vent Duct Access Door.Backdraft Damper,Replaced |
- on 970324,control Room Ventilation Sys Declared Inoperable Due to Failures of Backdraft Damper & Vent Duct Access Door.Backdraft Damper,Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000266/LER-1997-016, :on 970325,SG Level Logic Was Not Tested IAW Ts.Caused by Nonconservative Interpretation of Tss.Ts Amends Proposed to Provide Consistency Between Test Requirements & LCO Associated W/Sg Tests |
- on 970325,SG Level Logic Was Not Tested IAW Ts.Caused by Nonconservative Interpretation of Tss.Ts Amends Proposed to Provide Consistency Between Test Requirements & LCO Associated W/Sg Tests
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000266/LER-1997-017, :on 920508,containment Third Door Was Blocked Open During Refueling Operations.Caused by Interpretation That Movement of Core Components Per TS Definitions Rather than Literal Wording.Routine Maintenance Procedure Revised |
- on 920508,containment Third Door Was Blocked Open During Refueling Operations.Caused by Interpretation That Movement of Core Components Per TS Definitions Rather than Literal Wording.Routine Maintenance Procedure Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000266/LER-1997-018, :on 970403,potential for RHR Overpressure During Accidents Was Discovered.Original Design Did Not Provide Overpressure Protection for Isolated Piping Section. Evaluation Was Performed to Determine Stress on Piping |
- on 970403,potential for RHR Overpressure During Accidents Was Discovered.Original Design Did Not Provide Overpressure Protection for Isolated Piping Section. Evaluation Was Performed to Determine Stress on Piping
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000266/LER-1997-019, :on 970404,RHR Not Aligned IAW TS Requirements. Caused by non-conservative Decision Making & Not Recognizing When TS Were Not Controlling Plant Operations.Pbnp Mgt Philosophy Re TS Interpretations Changed to Minimize Use |
- on 970404,RHR Not Aligned IAW TS Requirements. Caused by non-conservative Decision Making & Not Recognizing When TS Were Not Controlling Plant Operations.Pbnp Mgt Philosophy Re TS Interpretations Changed to Minimize Use
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000266/LER-1997-020-01, Forwards LER 97-020-01,describing Plant Conditions in Which Ability to Achieve & Maintain Safe Shutdown in Event of Postulated Fire May Have Been Adversely Affected | Forwards LER 97-020-01,describing Plant Conditions in Which Ability to Achieve & Maintain Safe Shutdown in Event of Postulated Fire May Have Been Adversely Affected | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor | | 05000266/LER-1997-021, :on 970430,determined That Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Sys Was Not in Accordance W/Plant Design Basis.Cause Indeterminate.Closed & re-tagged Valves SF-27 & SF-28 & Investigated Basis for Fsar,App a |
- on 970430,determined That Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Sys Was Not in Accordance W/Plant Design Basis.Cause Indeterminate.Closed & re-tagged Valves SF-27 & SF-28 & Investigated Basis for Fsar,App a
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000266/LER-1997-022, :on 970507,discovered That Postulated Control Room Fire May Cause Electrical Hot Short That Disables Limit or Torque Switches for Certain Movs.Mods Initiated to Remedy Condition |
- on 970507,discovered That Postulated Control Room Fire May Cause Electrical Hot Short That Disables Limit or Torque Switches for Certain Movs.Mods Initiated to Remedy Condition
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor | | 05000266/LER-1997-023, :on 970508,discovered Noncompliant Emergency Lighting for Postulated App R Fires.Caused by Alternative Provisions Made in Original Safe Shutdown Analysis.Emergency Lights Will Be Installed |
- on 970508,discovered Noncompliant Emergency Lighting for Postulated App R Fires.Caused by Alternative Provisions Made in Original Safe Shutdown Analysis.Emergency Lights Will Be Installed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000266/LER-1997-024, :on 970501,determined Post Accident Sampling Sys Degradation.Caused by Inadequate Design Review.Will Upgrade Containment Atmosphere Sample Sys & Will Perform Mod to Reduce Dose within GDC 19 Dose Limits |
- on 970501,determined Post Accident Sampling Sys Degradation.Caused by Inadequate Design Review.Will Upgrade Containment Atmosphere Sample Sys & Will Perform Mod to Reduce Dose within GDC 19 Dose Limits
| | | 05000266/LER-1997-025, :on 970520,pressurizer Level Was Controlled Higher than Assumed in Accident Analysis.Caused by Inappropriately Changing Procedures W/O Adequate Consideration.Listed Affected Procedures Will Be Revised |
- on 970520,pressurizer Level Was Controlled Higher than Assumed in Accident Analysis.Caused by Inappropriately Changing Procedures W/O Adequate Consideration.Listed Affected Procedures Will Be Revised
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000266/LER-1997-026, :on 970521,discovered TS Violation of Operability Requirement of MSL Isolation.Caused by Inadequate Consideration for Operability of All Required Functions.Verified Low RCS Sys Average Temp |
- on 970521,discovered TS Violation of Operability Requirement of MSL Isolation.Caused by Inadequate Consideration for Operability of All Required Functions.Verified Low RCS Sys Average Temp
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000266/LER-1997-027, :on 970521,non-environmentally Qualified Matl Existed in Containment Hatch Applications.Caused by Inadequate Design Review.Mods Will Be Performed to Remove Existing Teflon Material |
- on 970521,non-environmentally Qualified Matl Existed in Containment Hatch Applications.Caused by Inadequate Design Review.Mods Will Be Performed to Remove Existing Teflon Material
| | | 05000266/LER-1997-031, :on 970619,discovered That Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) Pump Low Suction Pressure Trip Setpoints May Not Ensure Adequate Suction Pressure Protection for AFW Pumps Following Tornado Event.Caused by Inadequate Design |
- on 970619,discovered That Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) Pump Low Suction Pressure Trip Setpoints May Not Ensure Adequate Suction Pressure Protection for AFW Pumps Following Tornado Event.Caused by Inadequate Design
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000266/LER-1997-032, :on 970630,discovered Inadequately Rated Electrical Buses Could Disable Switchgear & Cause Secondary Fires.Caused by Characteristic of Original Design. Established twice-per-shift Fire Watches |
- on 970630,discovered Inadequately Rated Electrical Buses Could Disable Switchgear & Cause Secondary Fires.Caused by Characteristic of Original Design. Established twice-per-shift Fire Watches
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000266/LER-1997-034, :on 970707,discovered Unplanned Loss of Voltage on Train B Safeguards Buses.Caused by Inadequate Design & Design Review for Installation of New Train B Edgs.Incorrect Wiring Reworked |
- on 970707,discovered Unplanned Loss of Voltage on Train B Safeguards Buses.Caused by Inadequate Design & Design Review for Installation of New Train B Edgs.Incorrect Wiring Reworked
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000266/LER-1997-035, :on 970516,discovered Inadequate Seismic Support for Reactor Coolant Pump Rotor Stand.Caused by Rotor Stand Being Stored Since Initial Plant Construction.Moved Rotor Stand & Verified as Seismically Adequate |
- on 970516,discovered Inadequate Seismic Support for Reactor Coolant Pump Rotor Stand.Caused by Rotor Stand Being Stored Since Initial Plant Construction.Moved Rotor Stand & Verified as Seismically Adequate
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat | | 05000266/LER-1997-036, :on 970826,potential Common Mode Failure in DC Power Supply Which Could Disable AFW Sys Was Noted.Caused by Inadequate Design & Design Review.Plant Mods Were Performed to Eliminate Potential Common Mode Failure |
- on 970826,potential Common Mode Failure in DC Power Supply Which Could Disable AFW Sys Was Noted.Caused by Inadequate Design & Design Review.Plant Mods Were Performed to Eliminate Potential Common Mode Failure
| | | 05000266/LER-1997-037, :on 970903,potential Failure of EDG Load Sequence Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Design of EDG Load Sequencing Logic.Mod Restored Operability of EDG During Load Sequencing |
- on 970903,potential Failure of EDG Load Sequence Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Design of EDG Load Sequencing Logic.Mod Restored Operability of EDG During Load Sequencing
| | | 05000266/LER-1997-038, :on 970926,determined That Inoperability of Standby Emergency Power Placed Unit 2 in 7-day Lco.Caused by Failure That Occurred When EDG G-03 Was Shutdown.Repaired Governor & Returned EDG G-03 to Service |
- on 970926,determined That Inoperability of Standby Emergency Power Placed Unit 2 in 7-day Lco.Caused by Failure That Occurred When EDG G-03 Was Shutdown.Repaired Governor & Returned EDG G-03 to Service
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000266/LER-1997-039-01, :on 970615,RHR Loop Inoperable.Caused by Removal of CCW Pump from Svc.Ccw Pump Restored |
- on 970615,RHR Loop Inoperable.Caused by Removal of CCW Pump from Svc.Ccw Pump Restored
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000266/LER-1997-039, Forwards LER 97-039-00 Re RHR Loop Inoperable,Due to Inoperable CCW Pump.New Commitments within Rept Indicated in Italics | Forwards LER 97-039-00 Re RHR Loop Inoperable,Due to Inoperable CCW Pump.New Commitments within Rept Indicated in Italics | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000266/LER-1997-040-01, Forwards LER 97-040-01 Which Documents Event That Occurred at Point Beach Nuclear Plant,Unit 1.Commitments Made within Ltr,Encl | Forwards LER 97-040-01 Which Documents Event That Occurred at Point Beach Nuclear Plant,Unit 1.Commitments Made within Ltr,Encl | 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000266/LER-1997-041, :on 971023,potential Common Mode Failure in Afws Control Circuits Was Noted.Caused by AFW Control Circuits Installed by Plant Mods.Temporary Mods Will Restore Physical Separation for Cables |
- on 971023,potential Common Mode Failure in Afws Control Circuits Was Noted.Caused by AFW Control Circuits Installed by Plant Mods.Temporary Mods Will Restore Physical Separation for Cables
| | | 05000266/LER-1997-042, :on 971030,discovered That Upper Containment Personnel Air Interlock Had Been Inoperable.Caused by Removal of Remote Operating Gear.Reinstalled Remote Operating Connector Gear |
- on 971030,discovered That Upper Containment Personnel Air Interlock Had Been Inoperable.Caused by Removal of Remote Operating Gear.Reinstalled Remote Operating Connector Gear
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000266/LER-1997-043-01, Forwards LER 97-043-01,re Discovery That TS Surveillance of Reactor Trip Sys Interlocks Were Not Adequate. Supplemental Info Is Provided at End of Rept.Previous Commitments Made within Rept Also Encl | Forwards LER 97-043-01,re Discovery That TS Surveillance of Reactor Trip Sys Interlocks Were Not Adequate. Supplemental Info Is Provided at End of Rept.Previous Commitments Made within Rept Also Encl | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown | | 05000266/LER-1997-044, :on 971216,use of Dedicated Operators During IST of Containment Spray Sys Constituted Operation Prohibited by Ts.Caused by Improper Consideration for Use of Dedicated Operators.Revised Procedures |
- on 971216,use of Dedicated Operators During IST of Containment Spray Sys Constituted Operation Prohibited by Ts.Caused by Improper Consideration for Use of Dedicated Operators.Revised Procedures
| |
|