2CAN111201, Arkansas, Unit 2, Attachment 1 - Engineering Report CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page 364 of 533 Through End

Arkansas, Unit 2, Attachment 1 - Engineering Report CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page 364 of 533 Through End

ML12342A053
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	11/16/2012
From:	Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2CAN111201
Download: ML12342A053 (455)

Text

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 364 of 533 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YE NE UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. 2PT-5601-1 Equip. Class' 18 - InstrumentRacks Equipment Description NARROW RANGE CONTAINMENT PRESSURE (RPS &ESFAS)

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 225 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE- N/AE-The anchorageis free of bent, broken and loose hardware. All hardwareis present.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI uE- N/AE-1 oxidation?

The anchorageis free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEl UE- N/A[E anchors?

This component is anchored to a bracket that is anchoredto a concrete wall. There are no cracks in the concrete near the anchors for the bracket.

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 365 of 533 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Y; NO UMI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. 2PT-5601-1 Equip. Class 18 - InstrumentRacks Eauipment Description NARROW RANGE CONTAINMENT PRESSURE (RPS &ESFAS)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yii-I NEI UEi N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

All anchoragesupporting the system was found to be free from adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NE] U[-I N/A[--

No items in vicinity that can impact soft targets.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO ULI N/A--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Other neighboringcomponents are properly secured, thus it is not likely that they would collapse on this equipment item during a seismic event.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UEi N/A--

All attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[K NE-] UZ'7 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Equipment appears to be free from seismic interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 366 of 533 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ NR UlI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. 2PT-5601-1 Equip. Class 18- InstrumentRacks Equipment Description NARROW RANGE CONTAINMENT PRESSURE (RPS & ESFAS)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[]UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other seismic conditions were found to affect the equipment's safety functions.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Component and anchorage appearto be in good condition.

Power-cordsare present due to ongoing work due to the refueling outage. These cords are temporaty and would cause no damage to any plant equipment during a seismic event.

9,\ "( -

Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 9/28/2012 Sean Smolarek 41 9/28/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 367 of 533 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YZ NEI UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. 2PT-5601-1 Equip. Class 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description NARROW RANGE CONTAINMENT PRESSURE (RPS &ESFAS)

Photographs Note: Component Tag Note: General Overview - Observe power cords in vicinity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 368 of 533 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YN NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. 2PT-5601-1 Equip. Class 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description NARROW RANGE CONTAINMENT PRESSURE (RPS &ESFAS)

Note: General Overview - Observe power Note: Anchorage cords in vicinity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 369 of 533 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YE NF Ur-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. 2PT-5601-1 Equip. Class 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description NARROW RANGE CONTAINMENT PRESSURE (RPS & ESFAS)

Note: Anchorage

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 370 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NiE Ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. 2SE-2801 Equip. Class' 17- Engine Generators Equipment Description 2K-4A ENGINE SPEED PICKUP Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 2093 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEe UE[- N/AE-1 The component is mounted to EDG with 4 bolts.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE] U[E] N/A[]

oxidation?

There is no mild surface oxidation on anchors.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[E] NEJ UEJ N/AZ anchors?

Component is anchoredto steel.

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 371 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. 2SE-2801 Equip. Class2 17- Engine Generators Equipment Description 2K-4A ENGINE SPEED PICKUP

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UI- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not partof the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE Nil] UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

All anchorage was free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI UE] N/AE]

No soft target interaction effects.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UE] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No overhead equipment that is likely to collapse, conduits and lights secured. There are no ceiling tiles in the room.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NE] uE] N/AE]

The component's attachedline will have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI Ui]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the component is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 372 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ N Ui-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. 2SE-2801 Equip. Class3 17- Engine Generators Equipment Description 2K-4A ENGINE SPEED PICKUP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U[-

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

This component is unlabeled in field. It was identified based on attachedequipment and identification by Operationspersonnel.

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/11/2012 Genaro Barracan Jr. 1011112012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

I Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 373 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ No U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. 2SE-2801 Equip. CIass4 17- Engine Generators Equipment Description 2K-4A ENGINE SPEED PICKUP Photoaraohs Note: Component Overview on EDG Note: View of Component 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 374 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UIr-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. 2SE-2801 Equip. Class5 17- Enqine Generators Equipment Description 2K-4A ENGINE SPEED PICKUP 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 375 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ ND-1 U1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. 2TC-8666-2 Equip. Class, 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ABHVAC 2VUC-27B HTG COIL CONT Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2118 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NDl of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This component is part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEi U-] N/A[]

All anchorageis present,and it is free of bent, broken and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NI-] UI- N/AD oxidation?

The achorage is free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE] NEi UE] NWAN anchors?

The component is anchored to unistrut. The concrete around the anchorageof the unistrut is is good condition.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 376 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N-- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. 2TC-8666-2 Equip. Class2 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ABHVAC 2VUC-27B HTG COIL CONT

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[ NEI UE- N/A--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

2TC-8666-2 was mounted to unistrut anchored to the RC wall. The anchoragewas judged to be well with the specificationsin 6030.113 Seismic Raceway Supports, Attachments 3 and 10.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE] UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No adverse conditions were observed that would indicate that the anchorageof this component is seismically deficient.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UL] N/ALh There is no significantequipment near the wall mounted components that representa credible source for spatialinteraction.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UE- N/AF and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The overhead consisted of a drop ceiling. The primary frame structure was adequately secured and the ceiling panels are a light-weight composition that does not pose a significant hazard if they were to fall during a seismic event.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI ULi N/AEl Attached lines have adequateflexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE:] UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the component is free of potentially adverse seismic interaciton effects.

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 377 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. 2TC-8666-2 Equip. Class3 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ABHVAC 2VUC-27B HTG COIL CONT Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NJ Ur-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek Date: 10/4/2012 Daniel Parker 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 378 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ N[-l U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. 2TC-8666-2 Equip. Class4 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ABHVAC 2VUC-27B HTG COIL CONT Photographs Note: Equipment Identification Tag and lower Note: Top connection to Unistrut anchoredto connection to Unistrut anchored to seismic seismic block wall.

block wall.

4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 379 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. 2TC-8666-2 Equip. Classs 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ABHVAC 2VUC-27B HTG COIL CONT Note: 2TC-8666-2 component at far right. Note:

Similar units mounted in-line to Unistrut and anchoredto seismic block wall.

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 380 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YO NF UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class' N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area N/A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for d6cumenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[-- N[- ULI N/A[Z

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE- NE- Ur- N/AD-]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-] NEi U[I- N/AD-anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 381 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO NOi U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO- NE UEI N/A[:]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE U[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NE UE:- N/AE

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NE UE N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI UE N/AE

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NE UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 382 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Statu's: YO NE] U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip.

Equipment Description NOT USED Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO- NOI- U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 383 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y1-- NE] UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No, N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Photographs Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 384 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YO-- NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 385 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YEI NE U-il Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. 2E-12 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO I LOCAL CONTROL & EXCITE PANEL Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 2093 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[-- NEl UO N/A[I The anchorageconfiguration is consistent with CALC-94-SQ-2001-20, pages 191-199.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UO N/AE-oxidation?

There is mild surface oxidation on back anchors.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE-- N[E UZ N/AE-anchors?

Steel cabinet is anchored by welding and bolts. No cracks near bolts.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 386 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE] NZ UI-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. 2E-12 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO 1 LOCAL CONTROL & EXCITE PANEL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-] NEI UN N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y-I N[-- UN potentially adverse seismic conditions?

All anchorage was free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[-D NDl UZ N/AD--

No soft targetinteraction effects.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[-- NEI UN N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No tiles overhead. Lights and conduits overhead supportedwell. The one masonry wall in room is seismically qualified.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[-- NDl UO N/AD-Conduit has flexibility needed.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YDJNDJUN of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the component is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 387 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y-I NZ U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. 2E-12 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO 1 LOCAL CONTROL & EXCITE PANEL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[I NEI UN adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Top panel was opened and all components inside looked to be secure. However, the bottom panel could not be opened at the time of inspection, and will be completed at a laterdate.

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman . Date: 10/11/2012 Genaro Barraqan Jr. 10/11/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 388 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YEI NZ U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. 2E-12 Equip. Class4 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO I LOCAL CONTROL & EXCITE PANEL Photographs Note: Front of cabinet Note: View of bottom 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 389 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y-I NO U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 r

Equipment ID No. 2E-12 Equip. Class5 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO 1 LOCAL CONTROL & EXCITE PANEL Note: Inside of cabinet Note:

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 390 of 533 Sheet I of 6 Status: YE ND UDr-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. 2C04 Equip. Class' 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description MAIN CONSOLE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2118 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage is not part of the 50% configuration verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO N[:] U["] N/A[-]

Ne bent, broken, missing or loose hardware as observed

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEK NE] U[I N/AD-oxidation?

No corrosion was observed

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEI Ur- N/AD-anchors?

No cracks were observed

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 391 of 533 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NEi-I U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. 2C04 Equip. Class2 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description MAIN CONSOLE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UEi N/AI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No adverse conditions were observed that would indicate that the anchorageof this component is seismically deficient.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE uEr- N/A[:

No soft target interactioneffects.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UEi N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The overhead of the cabinetis a drop ceiling with the frame adequately secured. At the front of the panel the overhead panels were light weight metal grids that were sufficiently seated such that they would not be expected to fall during a seismic event.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI uE- N/A--

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEIUF1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the cabinet is free of potentially adverse seismic interacitoneffects.

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 392 of 533 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YN NL- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. 2C04 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description MAIN CONSOLE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

All the interiorcomponents, wiring harnesses,support braces and rails were adequatelysecured with appropriatehardware and appearnot to be at risk during a seismic event.

There were not any bolts observed that would indicate the console panels were connected to one another. There was a section of rigid electrical conduit across one gap between cabinets.

A keyboard on the top of the console was adequatelysecured with Velcro to prevent it from sliding around on top horizontalsurface of the console.

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarekl Z Date: 10/4/2012 Daniel Parker , kf 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 393 of 533 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YZ No UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. 2C04 Equip. CIass4 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description MAIN CONSOLE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM Photographs Note: Front of Console 2C04. Note: Front of Console 2C04.

4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 394 of 533 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YZ NEIr U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. 2C04 Equip. Class5 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description MAIN CONSOLE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM Note: Rear of Console 2C04 with rearpanel Note: Rearof Console 2C04 with rearpanel removed. removed.

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 395 of 533 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YE NF U[W Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. 2C04 Equip. Class 6 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description MAIN CONSOLE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM Photographs i5ap oetween aajacentpanel. Note: Frontof Console 2C04. Gap between adjacent panel and secured keyboard on top.

6 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 396 of 533 Sheet I of 6 Status: YZ NF UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-079 Equipment ID No. 2C16 Equip. Class' 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES GREEN Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2118 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[:] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage of this cabinet could not be seen without breaking the plane of the open door and physically moving internalwiring, thus this component is not considered as part of the items requiringanchorage verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U-I N/A--

No anchoragewas observed to be bent, broken, missing or loose.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI U[- N/A[--

oxidation?

No anchorage was observed that has more than mild corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NE- U[- N/A-1 anchors?

No cracks in the concrete were observed 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 397 of 533 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ N[-] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-079 Equipment ID No. 2C16 Equip. Class2 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES GREEN

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI U-- N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEl U[E potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No adverse conditions were observed that would indicate that the anchorageof this component is seismically deficient.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI uE-] N/AE-'

No soft target interaction effects.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI uE:I N/A[-E and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The overhead at the front and back of the cabinet is a drop ceiling with the frame adequatelysecured. At the front of the panel the overhead panels were light weight metal grids that were sufficiently seated such that they would not be expected to fall during a seismic event. At the back of the cabinet the overhead panels are a light weight composition that would not pose a significanthazard if they were to fall on or near the closed panel doors.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE- N/AE-]

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEIUE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the cabinet is free of potentially adverse seismic interaciton effects.

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 398 of 533 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YN NR U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-079 Equipment ID No. 2C16 Equip. Class3 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES GREEN Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NWJ UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

All the interiorcomponents, wiring harnesses, supportbraces and rails were adequately secured with appropriatehardware and appearnot to be at risk during a seismic event.

Note that observing the anchorage was difficult due to presence of wires inside cabinet.

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek 6 Date: 10/4/2012 Daniel Parker 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 399 of 533 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YZ NE] UrD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-079 Equipment ID No. 2C16 Equip. Class4 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES GREEN PhotoQra[hs Note: Front side of control panel 2C16. of control panel 2C16.

4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 400 of 533 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: Y[ NE] U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-079 Equipment ID No. 2C16 Equip. Class5 20- Instrumentation and ControlPanels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES GREEN Note: Inside of control panel 2C16, reardoors Note: Inside of control panel 2C16, reardoors opened for inspection. opened for inspection.

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 401 of 533 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YZ NF UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-079 Equipment ID No. 2C16 Equip. Class 6 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES GREEN Note: Inside of control panel 2C16, reardoors Note: Inside of control panel 2C16, reardoors opened for inspection. opened for inspection.

6 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 402 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N[] UE--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. 2C-187 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY CONDENSING UNIT 2VEIA Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2139 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage configuration verification is requiredfor this item. There are four anchorbolts onto steel plate. Thus, it is part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NE-] U[E] N/AE]

The two anchorplates that are in connection with the bolts appearto be broken.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UEr N/A[-]

oxidation?

No sign of corrosion in the component have been identified.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE] NE] UE] N/AZ anchors?

This component is not anchored to concrete. Therefore, this question does not apply.

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 403 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. 2C-187 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY CONDENSING UNIT 2VEIA

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NDI UDI] N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Based on the SEWS Document CALC-94-SQ-2001-20, the configuration that was observed matched with the descriptionsin the documentation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDl UDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

There are no other adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NDJ UD- N/AD' Soft targets throughout the component are free from impact.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NDI uD-1 N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead equipment and distributionsystems observed appearedto be properly secured, making it unlikely for a collapse to occur onto the component.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[D UD] N/ADl All attachedlines have been determined to have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

All neighboringequipment is properly installed and secured, making it unlikely for seismic interactioneffects to occur.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-C S- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 404 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UI]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. 2C-187 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY CONDENSING UNIT 2VEIA Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N["- UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other seismic conditions have been found to affect the components integrity and safety functions.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Equipment item contains some cut steel frames that are anchoredat the bottom of the equipment item. This appears to have no adverse seismic impact.

Evaluated by: Michael E. Perez Date: 10/11/2012 Sean Smolarek 10/11/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 405 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. 2C-187 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY CONDENSING UNIT 2VE1A Photographs Note: Equipment ID tag for Item 2C-187. Note: Bottom anchor bolt tabs appearto have been cut. This does not create an adverse seismic condition.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 406 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN NI[-] U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. 2C-187 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY CONDENSING UNIT 2VEIA Note: Note that this component contains Note: General view of equipment item 2C-attachedlines that appearto have adequate 187.

flexibility.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 407 of 533 Sheet I of 6 Status: YZ NEI UI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. 2C23-C Equip. Class' 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD, PLANT PROTECTIVE SYS (YELLOW)

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2118 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage of the cabinet was not visible without significant disassembly of the interiorcomponents.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UE N/AE]

No signs of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware were observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[Z NEI UE- N/AEl oxidation?

No signs of corrosionbeyond mild surface oxidation were observed

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN NE] UE] N/AEJ anchors?

No concrete cracks were observed

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 408 of 533 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Y[ NF ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. 2C23-C Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD, PLANT PROTECTIVE SYS (YELLOW)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI ULi N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[E NE] Uil potentially adverse seismic conditions?

During the seismic walk-down inspection there was no obvious indication that this component would be at risk during a seismic event.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI UiE N/AE'-

No soft targetinteractioneffects.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/All and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The overhead consisted of a drop ceiling. The primary frame structure was adequatelysecured and the ceiling panels are a light-weight composition that do not pose a significanthazard if they were to fall during a seismic event.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE-" U[:] N/A[:]

Conduit has adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI U[-]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the cabinet is free of potentially adverse seismic interacitoneffects.

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 409 of 533 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ NR UDI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. 2C23-C Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD, PLANT PROTECTIVE SYS (YELLOW)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

All the interiorcomponents, wiring harnesses,support braces and rails were adequatelysecured with appropriatehardware and appearnot to be at risk during a seismic event.

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek Date: 10/4/2012 Daniel Parker *- '* - 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 410 of 533 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YZ NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. 2C23-C Equip. Class4 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD, PLANT PROTECTIVE SYS (YELLOW)

Photographs Note: Panel 2C23-C front top with door open. Note: Panel 2C23-C front middle with door open.

4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 411 of 533 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YZ NE] UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. 2C23-C Equip. CIasss 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD, PLANT PROTECTIVE SYS (YELLOW Note: Panel 2C23-C front bottom with door Note: Panel 2C23-C reartop with door open.

open.

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 412 of 533 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YZ NEI UFW Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. 2C23-C Equip. Class 6 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD, PLANT PROTECTIVE SYS (YELLOW)

Note: Panel 2C23-C rearmiddle with door Note: Panel 2C23-C rearbottom with door open. open.

6 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-I12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 413 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ NO U[D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-082 Equipment ID No. 2C384 Equip. ClassI 20 - Instrumentation and ControlPanels Equipment Description ALTERNATE SHUT DOWN PANEL Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2133 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is anchored to the concrete floor. It is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NrE1 U["D N/AI-1 The anchoragethat was observed appearedto be free from all conditions stated above.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NM UD N/AED oxidation?

No signs of corrosion found throughout the equipment item, since the system only consists of electrical equipment.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ ND"I UF"D N/A--

anchors?

No cracks in the concrete have been observed in the visible anchorage of the system.

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 414 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YM NFD UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-082 Equipment ID No. 2C384 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ALTERNATE SHUTDOWN PANEL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-- ND U] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDý UD]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchoragehas been shown to be free from potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NDl UD1 N/ADl No soft targets can be potentially impacted by nearby equipment or structures during a seismic hazard.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[E NDI UD1 N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overheadequipment and distributionsystems appearedto be properly secured, making it unlikely for these to collapse onto the equipment item.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI U-] N/AD-All lines in the system have been shown to have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Equipment has been ruled to be free from potential seismic interaction effects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 415 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NEI ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-082 Equipment ID No. 2C384 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ALTERNATE SHUT DOWN PANEL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other seismic conditions have been identified to affect the equipment item's integrity and safety functions.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Equipment Item 2C384 has been observed to be in adequateconditions. Visible anchoragein the system appearedto be properlysecured. Neither corrosion nor cracks have been observed in its anchoredareas.All flexible lines and electricalequipment appearedto have adequate flexibility.

Overhead equipment appears to be properly secured and free from any form of seismic hazards.

Evaluated by: Michael E. Perez Date: 10/10/2012 Sean Smolarek 5", 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 416 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U --

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-082 Equipment ID No. 2C384 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ALTERNATE SHUT DOWN PANEL Photographs Note: Equipment ID tag for Item 2C384. Note: Anchorage was visible within the cabinet but was not captured by the image due to flash restrictions.The anchorage observed appearedto be free from any signs or corrosion or visible cracks in concrete.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 417 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-082 Equipment ID No. 2C384 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ALTERNATE SHUTDOWN PANEL Note: General overview of equipment item. Note: General overview of bottom of Note that electrical equipment within cabinet equipment item.

2C384 contains adequate flexibility.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 418 of 533 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-083 Equipment ID No. 2C80 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description CABINET-REMOTE SHUTDOWN PANEL Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 2154 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NE]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N[-] UE] N/A--

Anchorage appears to be free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE- N/A[E oxidation?

There is mild surface oxidation on plug welds.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NE] UIE N/AE[

anchors?

Steel cabinet is anchored by welding and bolts. No cracks near bolts.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 419 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UnI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-083 Equipment ID No. 2C80 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description CABINET-REMOTE SHUTDOWN PANEL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI U[-I N/AE-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

There are 3 welds on the front 4 welds in the back. There are 2 anchors on the sides, and 1 anchorbolt on the front of the cabinet. This configuration is consistent with document LCP-975063L201 pg. 23.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluation, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEl UE- N/A[-]

No soft target interactioneffects.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE] NEI UEr N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No tiles overhead. No masonry walls, lights and conduits in room supported well.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE- N/A[--

Conduit has adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the cabinet is free of potentially adverse seismic interacitoneffects.

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 420 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YM NI- U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-083 Equipment ID No. 2C80 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description CABINET-REMOTE SHUTDOWN PANEL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

CALC-94-SQ-2001-20, pages 170-173 analyzed the anchorageof 2C80, which determined that it was inadequatedue to interaction effects. LCP-975063L201 was written and installed to correct these conditions. This change package called for the installationof anchorbolts in addition to the existing plug welds. Based on visual inspection, these were installed as per LCP-975063L201. Drawing C-2260 Sht. 363 within LCP-975063L201 shows the field changes that occurred, and the final installationof three anchorbolts.

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/11/2012 Genaro BarraianJr. 10/11/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 421 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[-- UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-083 Equipment ID No. 2C80 Equip. Class4 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CABINET-REMOTE SHUTDOWN PANEL Photographs V

Note: Front of cabinet, showing equipment ID Note: View of plug welds.

tag.

4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 422 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NF UFL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-083 Equipment ID No. 2C80 Equip. CIass5 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CABINET-REMOTE SHUTDOWN PANEL Note: View of side anchorbolt. Note: View of front anchor bolt.

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 423 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NF-] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. 2L1-1079-2 Equip. Class, 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR 2E24A WIDE RANGE LEVEL Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2118 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NDI UD- N/AD The four screws observed are free of the above conditions.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U[D- N/AD-oxidation?

The four screws observed are free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NDI UD:] N/AD-anchors?

This item is mounted in the face of a cabinet. The cabinet is mounted to the concrete. No adverse concrete conditions were observed.

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 424 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UE--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. 2L1-1079-2 Equip. Class2 20- Instrumentatic)n and Control Panels EauinmE.nt flp._u-rintinn S£TFAM (FNFRA TOR 2F24A WIDEF RANGEF LEVEL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE-] NEI UEi N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%. 2L1-1079-2 is an indicatorgage mounted with 4 hex head bolts to the front panel of the console board 2C02. All four bolts seen in place.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE-] uFE N/AE1 Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment and structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[E] UEi N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The overhead was a drop ceiling that was properlysecured. The ceiling panels are thin gage metal slats that are adequatelyseated in the overhead frame. These are not likely to fall during a seismic event.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE:" uE-] N/AEl The attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] UEl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the component is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 425 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NIF UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. 2L1-1079-2 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR 2E24A WIDE RANGE LEVEL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The ReactorOperatorwas carefully observed removing and re-attachingthe cover panels from the front of the component. It was judged that the amount of force requiredto perform this procedure would have jostled the component if it was not properly secured. No movement of the gage was observed during this operation.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek ý4* Date: 10/4/2012 Daniel Parker o* .V,1, 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-C S- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 426 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. 2L1-1079-2 Equip. Class4 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR 2E24A WIDE RANGE LEVEL Photographs A2L- I UIY-:2 2PI-1 079-2 2L1-. 179-1 Note: Front Console Panel with Indicator Note: Indicator Gage 2L1-1079-2 with cover Gage 2L1-1079-2. panels removed showing four hex head bolts anchoringunit to console panel.

4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 427 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ ND- UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. 2L1-1079-2 Equip. Class5 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR 2E24A WIDE RANGE LEVEL Note: Overhead ceiling with thin gage metal Note:

slat panels.

s Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 428 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. 2L1-1179-1 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR 2E24B WIDE RANGE LEVEL Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2118 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NWI U[-W N/AD-]

The four screws observed are free of the above conditions.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NW U[- N/A[--

oxidation?

The four screws observed are free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO NWI U- N/AZ anchors?

This item is mounted in the face of a cabinet, so this is not applicable.

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 429 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NO U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. 2L1-1179-1 Equip. Class2 20- Instrumentaticon and Control Panels Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR 2E24B WIDE RANGE LEVEL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEi ULi N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%. 2LI- 1179-1 is an indicatorgage mounted with 4 hex head bolts to the front panel of the console board 2C02. All four bolts seen in place.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEl UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UEr N/AE-Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment and structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] U[:- N/A[-

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The overhead was a drop ceiling that was properly secured. The ceiling panels are thin gage metal slats that are adequately seated in the overhead frame. These are not likely to fall during a seismic event.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NE: uE- N/AE-The attachedlines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the component is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 430 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE N[- UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. 2L1-1179-1 Equip. Class3 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR 2E24B WIDE RANGE LEVEL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N-- UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The Reactor Operatorwas carefully observed removing and re-attaching the cover panels from the front of the component. It was judged that the amount of force requiredto perform this procedure would have jostled the component if it was not properlysecured. No movement of the gage was observed during this operation.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek Date: 10/4/2012 Daniel Parker J<) A 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 431 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NF- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. 2L1-1179-1 Equip. ClasS4 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR 2E24B WIDE RANGE LEVEL Photographs 2L1- IU/'9-2 2P-1079-2 2L-1 179-1 Note: Front Console Panel with Indicator Note: Indicator Gage 2L1-1 179-1 with cover Gage 2L1-1179-1. panels removed showing four hex head bolts anchoringunit to console panel.

4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 432 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. 2L1-1179-1 Equip. Class5 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR 2E24B WIDE RANGE LEVEL Photographs Note: Overhead ceiling with thin gage metal Note:

slat panels.

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 433 of 533 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UEIJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. 2LI-5637-2 Equip. Class, 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CSS REFUELING WATER TANK 2T3 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2118 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N[-] uF N/A--]

The four screws observed are free of the above conditions.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE] N/AE]

oxidation?

The four screws observed are free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NE] UE] N/AZ anchors?

This item is mounted in the face of a cabinet, so this is not applicable.

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 434 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NFI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. 2LI-5637-2 Equip. Class2 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description CSS REFUELING WATER TANK 2T3

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I N[- U-' N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not partof the 50%. 2LI-5637-2 is an indicatorgage mounted with 4 hex head bolts to the front panel of the vertical board 2C16. All four bolts seen in place.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] U[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NDI UED N/AZ!

Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment and structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI uE- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The overhead was a drop ceiling that was properly secured. The ceiling panels are thin gage metal slats that are adequately seated in the overhead frame. These are not likely to fall during a seismic event.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y] NDI UD-' N/A[:]

The attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE-I U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the component is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 435 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. 2LI-5637-2 Equip. Class3 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CSS REFUELING WATER TANK 2T3 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[: U[I-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The Reactor Operatorwas carefully observed removing and re-attachingthe cover panels from the front of the component. It was judged that the amount of force requiredto perform this procedure would have jostled the component if it was not properlysecured. No movement of the gage was observed during this operation.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek "z* Date: 10/4/2012 Daniel Parker " , 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 436 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NO- UFi-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl -086 Equipment ID No. 2LI-5637-2 Equip. Class4 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CSS REFUELING WATER TANK 2T3 Photographs Note: Vertical Console Panel with Indicator Note: Indicator Gage 2LI-5637-2 with cover Gage 2LI-5637-2. panels removed showing four hex head bolts anchoringunit to console panel.

4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 437 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YEI NEI UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. 2LI-5637-2 Equip. CIass5 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CSS REFUELING WATER TANK 2T3 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 438 of 533 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YE NEI UFD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. 2LY-4627-2A Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description I/E CONVERTER FOR PRESSURIZER LEVEL Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2133 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-E NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is anchoredby 2 screws onto the interiorframe of an electricalcabinet. It is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NE] UE:] N/A[-]

The screws that were observed appearedto be free from all conditions stated above.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEl UE- N/AE-oxidation?

No signs of corrosion found on the anchorage.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NE] U- N/AN anchors?

No concrete is part of the system, so this question does not apply.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 439 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NIJ Uni-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. 2LY-4627-2A Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description lIE CONVERTER FOR PRESSURIZER LEVEL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI U[Z N/Az (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEi U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorageis free from potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ N[1 UEr N/A[-E No soft targets shall be impacted during a seismic event.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ N[E UEr N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead equipment near the component appearsto be quite rigid, making it unlikely for a potential collapse to occur.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEJ UEý N/A[l All electrical lines in the component have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI U'-

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Equipment is free from potentialseismic interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 440 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ No U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. 2LY-4627-2A Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description liE CONVERTER FOR PRESSURIZER LEVEL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other seismic conditions have been identified to affect the equipment item's safety function.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Equipment Item 2LY-4627-2A has been observed to be in adequate conditions. The two screws that serve as the anchorageof the component have been ruled to be in adequate conditions. All electricallines appearedto have adequate flexibility. Overheadequipment appearedto be rigidly secured and free from any form of seismic hazards.

Evaluated by: Michael E. Perez *-.--* Date: 10/10/2012 Sean SmolarekZ" 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 441 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NI- U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. 2LY-4627-2A Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description I/E CONVERTER FOR PRESSURIZER LEVEL Photographs Note: Equipment ID tag for Item 2LY-4627- Note: Component is bolted using two screws 2A. to the interiorframes. There is one screw on top and one on the bottom of the component.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 442 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. 2LY-4627-2A Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description lIE CONVERTER FOR PRESSURIZER LEVEL Note: Note the attached wires onto the Note:

component contain adequate flexibility.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 443 of 533 Sheet I of 4 Status: YE NF-- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. 2LY-5637-2 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description SIGNAL ISOLATOR FOR CSS REFUELING WATER TANK 2T3 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 2150 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Equipment item is anchored to electricalcabinet. Item not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ Ni] UI N/A[-]

No signs of bent, broken, missing, or loose hardwareanywhere on or near the item.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEi U[i N/A[-

oxidation?

No signs of any type of oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE N-' UF] N/AZ anchors?

Concrete is not part of the installationof the item. Does not apply.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 444 of 533 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. 2LY-5637-2 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description SIGNAL ISOLATOR FOR CSS REFUELING WATER TANK 2T3

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YLI NEI U[- N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yo NE-] U[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Fourflattened screws are used for the installationconfiguration of the item to Cabinet2C15-2. These screws are properlyinstalled to hold the equipment in place.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[E U[E N/A[-]

All soft targets appearto be free from impact.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NE:] U[E N/AZ--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting are not likely to collapse onto the component since it is in a cabinet.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI UE- N/AZ1 The attached wires have enough flexibility to avoid any possible damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN N[-]UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

All directly neighboringequipment items are screwed properly to the cabinet.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 445 of 533 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN NE] URI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. 2LY-5637-2 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and ControlPanels Equipment Description SIGNAL ISOLATOR FOR CSS REFUELING WATER TANK 2T3 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEIl UMI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other adverse seismic conditions have been found that could affect the item's safety functions.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The equipment item is screwed into the cabinet.

Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqanJr. Date: 10/1/2012 Michael E. Perez 1101112012 01/01

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 446 of 533 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YM NEi] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. 2LY-5637-2 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description SIGNAL ISOLATOR FOR CSS REFUELING WATER TANK 2T3 Photographs Note: Fourflattened screws hold item 2LY- Note: For Cabinet 2C15-2, all other 5637-2 in place. equipment that is nearby 2LY-5637-2 is properly screwed onto the cabinet wall.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 447 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI UD]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. 2P1-1041-1 Equip. Class, 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description SGS SG 2E24A PRESSURE MC-1 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2118 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UEl N/AD-]

The four screws observed are free of the above conditions.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UEi N/AD:]

oxidation?

The four screws observed are free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NE-1 U[E N/A[D anchors?

This item is mounted in the face of a cabinet, so this is not applicable.

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 448 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NO U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. 2P1-1041-1 Equip. Class2 2 0 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Fniiinrnent Descrintion S(5 S( 2E24A PRESSURE MC-1

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-] NE] ULi N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%. 2P1-1041-1 is an indicatorgage mounted with 4 hex head bolts to the front panel of the console board 2C02. All four bolts seen in place.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[E NE] UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No potentiallyadverse seismic conditions were observed.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NE: UE: N/AEl Soft targetsare free from impact by nearby equipment and structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEl uE- N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The overhead was a drop ceiling that was properlysecured. The ceiling panels are thin gage metal slats that are adequatelyseated in the overhead frame. These are not likely to fall during a seismic event.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEi UEi N/AE--

The attached lines have adequateflexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE-- UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the component is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 449 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. 2P1-1041-1 Equip. Class3 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description SGS SG 2E24A PRESSURE MC-1' Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[-] U[-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The Reactor Operatorwas carefully observed removing and re-attaching the cover panels from the front of the component. It was judged that the amount of force requiredto perform this procedure would have jostled the component if it was not properly secured. No movement of the gage was observed during this operation.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarekz/ Date: 10/4/2012 Daniel Parker "J 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 450 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[--] Uni--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. 2P1-1041-1 Equip. Class4 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description SGS SG 2E24A PRESSURE MC-1 Photographs 2LI-1079-2 2P1-1079-2 2L1-1 179-1 Note: Front Console Panel with Indicator Note: IndicatorGage 2P1-1041-1 with cover Gage 2P1-1041-1. panels removed showing four hex head bolts anchoring unit to console panel.

4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 451 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NF U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. 2P1-1041-1 Equip. CIass5 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description SGS SG 2E24A PRESSURE MC-1 Photographs Note: Overhead ceiling with thin gage metal Note:

slat panels.

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 452 of 533 Sheet I of 7 Status: YN NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. 2PIC-1506-2 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ABHVAC-1B REF PRESS Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2139 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NZ UlI N/A[:]

No grout is installedunder a base plate. CR-ANO-C-2012-2804 initiated

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE Nil UI' N/A-1 oxidation?

The achorage is free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI uFr N/All anchors?

The anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 453 of 533 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. 2PIC-1506-2 Equip. Class 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ABHVAC-1B REF PRESS

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y- NDl U[- N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[-- No U[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No grout is installed under a base plate. CR-ANO-C-2012-2804 initiated.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y-I NDl UD- N/A[

There are no soft targetsthat could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEIl UD N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are no ceiling tiles in the room. There is a seismically qualified masonry block wall in the room. The lights are in good condition, and do not present an interaction effect.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE N[D] U[D N/AD-The attachedlines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UiD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the component is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 454 of 533 Sheet 3 of 7 Status: YN NEI UI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. 2PIC-1506-2 Equip. Class 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ABHVAC-1B REF PRESS Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A base plate does not have grout installed. CR-ANO-C-2012-2804 initiated.

A seismic block wall was observed nearby which, if failed, would damage the equipment. The block wall is seismically designed and has a component ID of 24-B-234. Consideringthe wall is seismically designed, it is judged to be acceptableand have no adverse impact to safety related components during a seismic event.

Evaluated by: Eric Dilbone 6

• Date: 10/1/2012 Sean Smolarek Z"" 10/1/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 455 of 533 Sheet 4 of 7 Status: YN NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. 2PIC-1506-2 Equip. Class 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ABHVAC-1B REF PRESS Photoqraphs Note: Equipment Tag Note: General Arrangement

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 456 of 533 Sheet 5 of 7 Status: YZ NEI UF-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. 2PIC-1506-2 Equip. Class 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ABHVAC-IB REF PRESS Note: Box Internals Showing Anchorage Note: Box Internal Anchorage

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 457 of 533 Sheet 6 of 7 Status: YZ NE] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. 2PIC-1506-2 Equip. Class 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ABHVAC-1B REF PRESS Note: ExternalAnchorage Note: ExternalAnchorage

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 458 of 533 Sheet 7 of 7 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. 2PIC-1506-2 Equip. Class 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ABHVAC-1B REF PRESS Note: Base Plate without Grout Note: Base Plate without Grout

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 459 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-091 Equipment ID No. 2PS-1508 Equip. Classi 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description 2C-58 COMPR PRESSURE SWITCH Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2139 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YF- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UrZ N/A[-]

All anchorage is present, and it is free of bent, broken and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEi ULi N/A[-

oxidation?

The achorageis free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI ULi N/As anchors?

This item is not anchored to concrete, so this is not applicable.

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 460 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ No U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. 2PS-1508 Equip. Class 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description 2C-58 COMPR PRESSURE SWITCH

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI U- NWAN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not partof the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorage is free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI UE' N/A[:]

Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment and structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ N[1 UE- N/A[:-

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are no ceiling tiles in the room. There is a seismically qualified masonry block wall in the room. The lights are in good condition, and do not present an interaction effect.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE- u- N/AE Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ Nn U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 461 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. 2PS-1508 Equip. Class 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description 2C-58 COMPR PRESSURE SWITCH Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEF- U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A seismic block wall was observed nearby. The block wall is seismically designed and has a component ID of 24-B-234. Considering the wall is seismically designed, it is judged to be acceptable and have no adverse impact to safety related components during a seismic event.

Evaluated by: Eric Dilbone Date: 10/1/2012 Sean Smolarek 10/1/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 462 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YV NE] UF--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-091 Equipment ID No. 2PS-1508 Equip. Class 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description 2C-58 COMPR PRESSURE SWITCH Photoqraphs Note: Equipment Tag Note: General Arrangement

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 463 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YM NI j U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. 2PS-1508 Equip. Class 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Eauibment DescriDtion 2C-58 COMPR PRESSURE SWITCH Note: GeneralArrangement Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 464 of 533 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. 2PWR-1041-1 Equip. Class, 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description SGS SG 2E24A PRESSURE MC-1 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 2150 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Equipment item is anchored to electrical cabinet. Item not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U[: N/AE No signs of bent, broken, missing, or loose hardwareanywhere on or near the item.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI UE- N/Al-'

oxidation?

No signs of any type of oxidation have been found.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-] NE] U[E N/AZ anchors?

Concrete is not partof the installationof the item. Does not apply.

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 465 of 533 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. 2PWR-1041-1 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description SGS SG 2E24A PRESSURE MC-1

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-I NEI UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Two flattened screws (one on top and one on the bottom) are used for the installationconfiguration of the item to Cabinet2C15-1.

These screws are properly installed to hold the equipment in place.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI ULi N/All Four wires are attachedbelow the equipment item using flattened

'screws for each wire. These screws are properly secured, reducing any possible impact that can occur.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN ND: UD' N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting are not likely to collapse onto the component since it is in a cabinet.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NEIr ULi N/Al]

The attached wires have enough flexibility to avoid any possible damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

All directly neighboringequipment items are screwed properly to the cabinet.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 466 of 533 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ N[] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. 2PWR-1041-1 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description SGS SG 2E24A PRESSURE MC-1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[:]UEJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other adverse seismic conditionshave been found that could affect the item's safety functions.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The equipment item is screwed into the cabinet.

Evaluated by: Genaro Barra-an Jr. Date: 10/1/2012 Michael E. Perez 10/1/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 467 of 533 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ No U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. 2PWR-1041-1 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description SGS SG 2E24A PRESSURE MC-1 Photographs Note: Generalposition of Item 2PWR-1041-1 Note: A close-up view of Item 2PWR-1041-1, in Cabinet 2C15-1. which is the middle of the othertwo pieces of equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 468 'f 533 Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[I NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No. 2PY-1141-lB Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description SGS SG 2E24B PRESSURE MC-1 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 2150 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Equipment is screwed into electrical cabinet. Item not partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NE] U[ N/AE No signs of bent, broken, missing, or loose hardwareanywhere on or near the item.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NE-- UEr N/AE-]

oxidation?

No signs of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-E NE UE N/A[

anchors?

Concrete is not applicable since the item is partof a cabinet.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 469 of 533 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YO NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No. 2PY-1141-lB Equip. Class 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description SGS SG 2E24B PRESSURE MC-1

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I- NEI U-I N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Two flattened screws (one on top and one on the bottom) are used for the installationconfigurationof the item to Cabinet2C15-1.

These screws are properlyinstalled to hold the equipment in place.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UEi N/AEl Six wires are attachedto the equipment item using flattened screws for each wire. These screws are properlysecured.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEJ UE- N/A[-'

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting are not likely to collapse onto the component since it is in a cabinet.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UEi N/AE:-

The attachedwires screwed to the equipment have plenty of flexibility so as to avoid any possible damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NU-1 U[-]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

All other equipment items directlyneighboring Item 2PY-1141-1B are screwed properlyto the cabinet.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 470 of 533 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YE Nn UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No, 2PY-1141-IB Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description SGS SG 2E24B PRESSURE MC-1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEJUM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other adverse seismic conditions have been found that can affect the equipment item's safety functions.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The equipment item is properly screwed into the cabinet.

Evaluated by: Genaro BarraganJr. Date: 10/1/2012 Michael E. Perez 10/1/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 471 of 533 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YN NEIl U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment DeNo. 2PY-1141-IB Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description SGS SG 2E24B PRESSURE MC-1 Photographs Note: Overall configuration of Item 2PY-1141- Note: Equipment items directly neighboring lB. Note that this item is located above the Item 2PY-1141-lB are properlysecured, "A T" sign. reducing any seismic interactionswith this equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 472 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N-- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. 2SY-2821 Equip. Class, 17- Engine Generators Equipment Description 2K-4B SPEED CONV Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 2094 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ N[E] U[E] N/AE-No hardwareissues observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE uE-- N/AZ-oxidation?

No corrosion issues observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NE- U["] N/A[

anchors?

Anchored to steel 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 473 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NF] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. 2SY-2821 Equip. Class 17- Engine Generators Equipment Description 2K-4B SPEED CONV

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI-- Ni] ULi N/AH (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not partof the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[J U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UE] N/AE]

No soft targets nearby.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE] ur-1 N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry walls are seismically qualified. Component located inside cabinet, and no interactioneffects inside cabinet.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE]I UE N/AE]

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 474 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NO- U-iJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. 2SY-2821 Equip. Class 17- Engine Generators Equipment Description 2K-4B SPEED CONV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM N[]UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other adverse conditions found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinetthat component is located in is mounted on spring anchors.

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman .. Date: 10/2/2012 Eric Dilbone &4 10/2/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 475 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NFI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl--094 Equipment ID No. 2SY-2821 Equip. Class 17- Engine Generators Equipment Description 2K-4B SPEED CONV Photoqraphs Note: Component Overview Note: End of Component

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 476 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NO U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. 2SY-2821 Equip. Class 17- Engine Generators Equipment Description 2K-4B SPEED CONV Note: Component Mounting Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 477 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NO UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. 2TC-8640-2 Equip. Class' 19- Temperature Sensors Equipment Description ABHVAC 2VEF-24D CONTROL Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 2094 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N[: UE1 N/A[-

No hardwareissues observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE] ULI N/Ar-oxidation?

No mild surface oxidation present or corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ N[E UI[ N/A[]

anchors?

No cracks in concrete.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 478 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NO U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. 2TC-8640-2 Equip. Class 19- Temperature Sensors Equipment Description ABHVAC 2VEF-24D CONTROL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I NEI U-ij N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] U-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No potentiallyadverse seismic conditions were observed.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE- NEJ UE- N/A[D No soft targets nearby.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UEi N/AE-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Nearby masonry wall is seismic. No ceiling tiles. Lighting is resting on pipe may cause interactionissue.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE] UEl N/AEl Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[E NE- UE[

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interaction effects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 479 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NEI Ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. 2TC-8640-2 Equip. Class 19- Temperature Sensors Equipment Description ABHVAC 2VEF-24D CONTROL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other conditions identified.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman . Date: 10/2/2012 Eric Dilbone 6 I* __ -- "--___ -- 10/2/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 480 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE-I UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. 2TC-8640-2 Equip. Class 19- Temperature Sensors Equipment Description ABHVAC 2VEF-24D CONTROL Photographs Note: Component Tag Note: Overview of Component

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 481 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NR UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. 2TC-8640-2 Equip. Class 19- Temperature Sensors Equipment Description ABHVAC 2VEF-24D CONTROL Note: Adjacent Ladder Note: Overhead Lighting

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-0000l Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 482 of 533 Sheet I of 7 Status: YN NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. 2E-35B Equip. Classi 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description SHTDOWN CLNG HTEX Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN N[E UE-] N/A[E]

No bent, broken or missing hardware was observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[-- UE- N/A--

oxidation?

No corrosion was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ Nn UE- N/A[--

anchors?

No cracks in the concrete were observed in the vicinity of the anchors.

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 483 of 533 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YZ NEI U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. 2E-35B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description SHTDOWN CLNG HTEX

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN N[-- U[-] N/AE!

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration was observed to be consistent with CAL C SQ-2001-21, page 34.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[-] U[:]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No potentiallyadverse seismic conditions were observed.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE] NEI UE! N/AZ No soft targets were observed.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE] UE[- N/AE!"

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

A light fixture above has two supports with different properties,one is a chain with an open "S"hook and the other is a rigid conduit. In a seismic event the fixture could break away and impact equipment, but the heat exchanger is large enough to withstand impact of a light fixture.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE!I UE N/AE!

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE'] Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

No adverse seismic interactioneffects were observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-C S- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 484 of 533 Sheet 3 of 7 Status: YZ NEIl UnI]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. 2E-35B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description SHTDOWN CLNG HTEX Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI]- UMi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The heat exchangeris bolted to two concrete saddles 12 ft apart.The concrete saddles appearedto be in good condition. Anchor bolts were in good condition with minor surface corrosion observed at one location.

A light fixture above has two supports with different properties,one is a chain with an open "S"hook and the other is a rigid conduit. In a seismic event the fixture could break away and impact equipment.

Evaluated by: DanielAndoh &__ý_- _-_*

f Date: 9/29/2012 Daniel Parker 912912012 9/Q29/20-1

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 485 of 533 Sheet 4 of 7 Status: YZ NF] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. 2E-35B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description SHTDOWN CLNG HT EX Photographs Note: Support saddle Note: Support saddle with anchorbolts

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 486 of 533 Sheet 5 of 7 Status: YN NEI- ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. 2E-35B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description SHTDOWN CLNG HTEX Note: Support saddle with anchor bolts Note: Support saddle with anchor bolts opposite end.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-1 2-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 487 of 533 Sheet 6 of 7 Status: Y[ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. 2E-35B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Ecuipment Description SHTDOWN CLNG HTEX Note: Support saddle with anchor bolts Note: Close up of light fixture with open "S" opposite end. hook directly above the heat exchanger.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 488 of 533 Sheet 7 of 7 Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-096 Equipment ID No. 2E-35B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description SHTDOWN CLNG HTEX Note: Close up of light fixture with open "S" Note:

hook directly above the heat exchanger.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 489 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. 2E-52B Equip. Class' 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description LPSI PUMP SEAL COOLER Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N[-]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YM ND UM N/A-No bent, broken or missing hardware was observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI ULI N/A-1 oxidation?

There is mild surface corrosion on channel and two bolts. The mild corrosion does not present an adverse seismic condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE- NEI uE- N/AH anchors?

Anchorage is a bolted steel connection.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 490 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N-- U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. 2E-52B Equip. Cl ass 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description LPSI PUMPSEAL COOLER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ Ni] Url N/All (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration conforms to CALC-94-SQ-2001-21, page 42.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN No] Ui]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NE] UiD N/All Anchorage for nearby equipment and structures appearedadequate.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U0i N/AL-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead systems and equipment were observed to be adequately anchored.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDI U[:] N/A--

Flexible lines were observed.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ Ni] UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

No potentiallyadverse seismic interactioneffects were observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 491 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE N] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. 2E-52B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description LPSI PUMP SEAL COOLER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Channelsupport appeared to be in acceptable condition with minor surface corrosion.

Evaluated by: DanielAndoh Date: 10/1/2012 Daniel Parker 10/1/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 492 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NEI- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. 2E-52B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description LPSI PUMP SEAL COOLER Photographs Note: Mount Note: Channelsupport

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 493 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ N[- UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. 2E-52B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Eauipment Description LPSI PUMP SEAL COOLER Note: Channel support Note: Channelsupport from side.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 494 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y] NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. 2T-31A Equip. Class, 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description STARTING AIR TANK Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 2093 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEl of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NE] U[-] N/A[:]

Thier are 4 anchorbolts to concrete. This configuration is consistent with CALC-94-SQ-2001-21, pages 78-84 and DWG C-2260 Sh. 71. The component has all anchoragepresent and fastened.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEi UE1 N/AZ-oxidation?

The anchors are painted.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UE3 N/AZl anchors?

Component is anchored to concrete, no structural cracks present.

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 495 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NO U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. 2T-31A Eqt uip. Class2 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description STARTING AIR TANK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NE ul- N/A[-]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The configuration and anchors in field are consistent with plant documentation, in particulardrawing C-2260 Sht. 71, except for the tabs specified. There are 3"x3.5" tab specified and observed in the field are 3.5"x4" tabs. CR-ANO-2-2012-02980 has been initiated.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEi UL- N/A[--

No soft targetinteraction effects.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEl U[E N/A--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No tiles overhead. Lights and conduits overhead supported well. The one masonry wall in room is seismically qualified. Ducts overhead are secure.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] u[-] N/Ar-The attachedlines to component have adequateflexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEI U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interaction effects.

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 496 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE Nr-] UM]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. 2T-31A Equip. Class3 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description STARTING AIR TANK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other adverse conditions found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/11/2012 Genaro Barraaan Jr. 10/11/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 497 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE Nn-] UnI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. 2T-31A Equip. Class4 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description STARTING AIR TANK Photoqraphs Note: Component ID Note: Component Overview 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 498 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. 2T-31A Equip. Class5 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description STARTING AIR TANK Note: Component Anchorage Note: Component Anchorage 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 499 of 533 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YE NI J UF-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-099 Equipment ID No. 2T-31C Equip. Class' 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description STARTING AIR TANK Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 2094 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI U[II N/AE-'

Anchorage is free of hardware issues.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI U-I N/A[--

oxidation?

No corrosion or mild surface oxidation present.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEI U[W N/A[W anchors?

No cracks are present.

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 500 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. 2T-31C Equ lip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description STARTING AIR TANK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NZ U-- N/A[']

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

According to CALC-94-SQ-2001-21, page 87, there are four 3"x3.5" tabs supportingtank skirt. In-field there are four 4"x3.5" tabs supporting tank skirt. The calculationalso says there is a 6" high 5/16" skirt. In field there is 9" difference between skirt and tank. Drawing C-2260 Sh. 71 shows the anchorpattern. The 3/4" diameteranchors are consistent with plant documentation listed above. CR-ANO-C-20012-2980 is initiated.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NW uEr1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] Ui[ N/A[-'

No soft targets nearby.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[-] U-- N/A[:]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Nearby masonry wall is seismic. No ceiling tiles.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEl U[E N/AEl Attached line has adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI u-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 501 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NEI UI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. 2T-31C Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description STARTING AIR TANK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[il U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other adverse conditions are present.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/2/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/2201 101212012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 502 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

• SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. 2T-31C Equip. Class 2 I - Tanks and Heat Exchanaers Equipment Description STARTING AIR TANK PhotoaraDhs Note: Component Overview Note: ComponentAnchorage

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 503 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ N-- UD[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl--099 Equipment ID No. 2T-31C Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description STARTING AIR TANK Note: Component Anchorage Note: Component Anchorage

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 504 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N-II U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. 2T-57A Equip. Class' 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description EMER. DIESEL FUEL TANK Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 254 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is anchored with eight bolts, with four bolts on each side. It is part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N[l U[-" N/A[]

There are 8 anchorbolts; no loose or missing hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[:- UL] N/A[-]

oxidation?

There is mild surface oxidation on anchor bolts.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UE[ N/AEl anchors?

There are no cracks in the concrete where the anchorsare located.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-1 2-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 505 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[. NEI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. 2T-57A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EMER. DIESEL FUEL TANK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN ND] UiD N/A[-D (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorageis consistent with Drawings C-47 and C-48.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN ND U[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions were found nearthe anchors.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UDl N/ADl There are small lines nearby that are not interaction effects.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UDl N/A[-D and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No tiles overhead, No masonry walls, 4 lights in room supported. There is one light that is off-centered because of temporary scaffold. Ladder and platform anchored well.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] UD-] N/AD-Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

The equipment was found to be free from potentiallyadverse seismic effects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 506 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NEIl UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. 2T-57A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EMER. DIESEL FUEL TANK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y-I No UL]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Tank support has rust on weld lines needs to be evaluated to ensure no cracking in weld. The rust lines are typically on the bottom of the saddle support. CR-ANO-1-2012-2911 has been initiated.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Anchorage found in the system has been found to be in adequateconditions. No signs of corrosionor cracks in concrete have been found in its anchorages. There is, however, some signs of corrosion found in the welds between the fuel tank and the steel support system, and this may require some maintenance. Other than this issue, no other adverse seismic conditions have been found.

Evaluated by: Roy Berrvman Date: 10/9/2012 Michael E. Perez 2- - 10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 507 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. 2T-57A Equip. CI ass 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description EMER. DIESEL FUEL TANK Photographs Note: Equipment tag ID for Item 2T-57A. Note Note: Anchorage found to support the that the item description is different from the equipment item has been found to be in description found in the documentation, but adequate conditions.

they both are referringto the same equipment item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 508 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. 2T-57A Equip. COass 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EMER. DIESEL FUEL TANK Note: It appearsthat there are some signs of Note: The entire system would act as a rigid corrosion in the welding between the fuel tank body during a seismic event. Because the tank and the steel support system. is properly secured, soft targets such as attachedpipes are free from potential impact.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 509 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N[] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-101 Equipment ID No. 2VUC-6A Equip. Class, 10 - Air Handlers Equipment Description EFW PUMP ROOM COOLER Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 2024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Item is anchoredto the ceiling. This item is part of the 50%, where anchorageconfiguration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U[- N/AEZ All anchorageappears to be free of bent, broken, or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NE] UW--] N/A--

oxidation?

All anchorageis free of corrosion. There is mild oxidation on one of the anchoragebolts, but not enough to affect its integrity.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NE] UW- N/AZý anchors?

There were no cracks observed in the concrete near the anchorsin the ceiling.

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 510 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-101 Equipment ID No. 2VUC-6A Equip. Class 10 -Air Handlers Equipment Description EFW PUMPROOM COOLER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEi Uil N/AF-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configurationis consistent with plant documentation. There were 14 bolts anchoringthe equipment to the ceiling.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y] NO U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage is free of adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEJ UEJ N/AE:

See picture on Page 4.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[-- N/AE:

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

These items are not likely to collapse onto the equipment of interest.

The equipment 2VUC-6A is the anchoreddirectly to the concrete ceiling.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UEr N/AE1 All attached lines observed have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[-] UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Equipment is free of potentialadverse seismic interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 511 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-101 Equipment ID No. 2VUC-6A Equip. Class 10 - Air Handlers Equipment Description EFW PUMPROOM COOLER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[E N[E U[-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Area surroundingthe equipment has been inspected and no conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Equipment 2VUC-6A was inspected and all anchorageappears to be in properorder and free of corrosion or missing hardware.

Evaluated by: Genaro Barrae-an Jr. Date: 10/2/2012 Michael E. Perez I0221 101212012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 512 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NIZ UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-101 Equipment ID No. 2VUC-6A Equip. Class 10 - Air Handlers Equipment Description EFW PUMP ROOM COOLER Photographs Note: Equipment ID 2VUC-6A. The official tag Note: This image shows the unit 2VUC-6A, was underneath the equipment, but from floor which hangs over the piping.

level it was illegible.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 513 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE N-I U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-101 Equipment ID No. 2VUC-6A Equip. Class 10-Air Handlers Equipment Description EFW PUMPROOM COOLER Note: General image of anchorage bolts (one Note: General image showing the bottom of side) in the ceiling. unit 2VUC-6A.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 514 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NEI UL--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-001 Equipment ID No. 2SW-56 Equip. Class' 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP EMER MU FROM LOOP II Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 Room, Area 2073 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE! NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage verification is not required since this is an in-line component.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE! NE! UE- N/A[

This is not applicable since this is an in-line component.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE! NE! UE! N/AZ oxidation?

This is not applicable since this is an in-line component.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE! NE! UE! N/A[

anchors?

This is not applicablesince this is an in-line component.

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 515 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N] UI-J Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-O01 Equipment ID No. 2SW-56 Equip. Class 7 - Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP EMER MU FROM LOOP II

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NF-n U-- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NE] UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorageis free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN Nrn Urn N/A-There are no soft targets to be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NrI Urn N/AF-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are no ceiling tiles or masonry block walls in this room. The lights in this room are not in the vicinity of this component.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN Nrn Urn N/AE-n Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NrI UIr of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 516 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-O01 Equipment ID No. 2SW-56 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP EMER MU FROM LOOP II Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety fuctions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek Date: 10/12/2012 Eric Dilbone 1/2,/2012 1011212012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 517 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-001 Equipment ID No. 2SW-56 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP EMER MU FROM LOOP II Photoqraphs Note: Photo showing the equipment ID tag on Note: General view showing the valve the valve. vertically in-line with the piping.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 518 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NO UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-801 Equipment ID No. 2SW-56 Equip. Class 7 - Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP EMER MU FROM LOOP II Note: View overhead of 2SW-56. Note: View immediately in front of the hand wheel for 2SW-56.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 519 of 533 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YO NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. 2SW-57 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP HDR #1 EMERG FEED ISOL TO FUEL POOL Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2040 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage verification is not required since this is an in-line component.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y'I NE U[] N/A[

This is not applicable since this is an in-line component.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YOI NE ULi N/A[

oxidation?

This is not applicable since this is an in-line component.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE: NE] UEJ N/AZ anchors?

This is not applicable since this is an in-line component.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 520 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. 2SW-57 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP HDR #1 EMERG FEED ISOL TO FUEL POOL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-- N[l U[-W N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UW-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NEI IJE NIArW There are no soft targets to be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U0 N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are no ceiling tiles in this room. Masonry block walls were seismically qualified. Overheadfluorescent lighting was secured with chain supports. No open S hooks were observed.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI U- N/A--

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEIUW of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 521 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YO NEI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. 2SW-57 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP HDR #1 EMERG FEED ISOL TO FUEL POOL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety fuctions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Mild surface oxidation was observted on the body of the valve.

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek Date: 10/12/2012 Eric Dilbone 1/420 1011212012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 522 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NEI U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. 2SW-57 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP HDR #1 EMERG FEED ISOL TO FUEL POOL Photoqraphs Note: Photo showing the equipment ID tag on Note: General front view showing the valve the valve. horizontally in-line with the piping.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 523 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN NF- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. 2SW-57 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP HDR #1 EMERG FEED ISOL TO FUEL POOL Note: View from below 2SW-57. Note: Seismic block wall in the vicinity of the valve (upper). Overhead fluorescent lighting (lower).

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 524 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. 2SW-62 Equip. Class, 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP EMER MU FROM LOOP I/

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 Room, Area 2073 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage verification is not requiredsince this is an in-line component.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NEIl ULI N/AN This is not applicablesince this is an in-line component.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YOI NE] U[-] N/A]

oxidation?

This is not applicable since this is an in-line component.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-] NF-] UE] N/AZ anchors?

This is not applicable since this is an in-line component.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 525 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. 2SW-62 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP EMER MU FROM LOOP II

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEi U] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NE- UEi N/A[E There are no soft targets to be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEl UE: N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are no ceiling tiles or masonry block walls in this room. The lights in this room are not in the vicinity of this component.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEl UEl N/A[E]

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[E NE'] UE--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interaction effects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 526 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ No U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. 2SW-62 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP EMER MU FROM LOOP /I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEJ UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety fuctions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek Date: 10/12/2012 Eric Dilbone " J-10/12/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 527 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U--I1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. 2SW-62 Equip. Class 7 - Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP EMER MU FROM LOOP II Photographs Note: View of 2SW-62, an in-line valve. Note: General view of 2SW-62.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 528 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. 2SW-62 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP EMER MU FROM LOOP II Note: View immediately above 2SW-62. Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 529 of 533 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N-- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. 2SW-138 Equip. Class 7 - Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SWHDR #1 EMERG FEED ISOL TO FUEL POOL Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2040 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage verification is not requiredsince this is an in-line component.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UEl N/AZ This is not applicablesince this is an in-line component.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[E NEI UE- N/AZ oxidation?

This is not applicable since this is an in-line component.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE] NE-1 UE] N/AZ anchors?

This is not applicable since this is an in-line component.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 530 of 533 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U I-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. 2SW-138 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SW HDR #1 EMERG FEED ISOL TO FUEL POOL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YLI NEI UEi N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorageis free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[D NEi U[-E N/A[E]

There are no soft targets to be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UEr N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are no ceiling tiles in this room. Masonry block walls were seismically qualified. Overheadfluorescent lighting was secured with chain supports. No open S hooks were observed.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[E U[-- N/AE-Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEjUE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 531 of 533 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. 2SW-138 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SWHDR #1 EMERG FEED ISOL TO FUEL POOL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety fuctions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek z, Date: 10/1212012 Eric Dilbone /12 1011212012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 532 of 533 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YM NFI- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. 2SW-138 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SW HDR #1 EMERG FEED ISOL TO FUEL POOL PhotoaraDhs Note: Photo showing the equipment ID tag on Note: General front view showing the valve the valve. horizontally in-line with the piping.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 533 of 533 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. 2SW-138 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SWHDR #1 EMERG FEED ISOL TO FUEL POOL Note: View from side of 2SW-138. Note: Rear view of 2SW-138.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 1 of 251 Attachment D Area Walk-By Checklists (AWCs)

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 2 of 251 Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ NE] U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-001 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 1 2014 SWEL Components: SWELl- 001 (2YM-003)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items.

The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NWl U-- N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in area is in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NFW UW] N/AF-significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment is free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NEI UEI N/A[-

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Tray and conduit are adequatelysupportedin room.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 3 of 251 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NEI UI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-O01 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2014

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[D NEI U-I N/A[-

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area appears to be free of spatial interactions.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] U[I N/AE]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There is no flooding or spray source.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEIL ULE] N/AE]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse interactionsthat could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE- U[I N/A[-

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There are no temporary installationsor portable equipment in the area.

Housekeepingpractices are acceptable.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 4 of 251 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YNI NEI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-001 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2014

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEi] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other adverse seimic conditions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

There are no adverse seismic interactionsanticipated with this equipment. This piece of equipment is located overheadand in a piping system that is not affected by other components in the room.

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 9/272012 Eric Dilbone 9/27/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 5 of 251 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YM NO U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-001 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2013 SWEL Components: SWELl- 001 (2YM-003)

Photographs Note: Adjacent Supports Note: Component Overview

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 6 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ NFil U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area' 241 SWEL Components: SWELl- 002 (2F-6A)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NE- UD- N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Generally equipment anchoragesappearedto be in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U-- N/AZ-significant degraded conditions?

No significantdegraded conditions were observed.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NEI UZ1 N/A--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Fill conditionsin cable trays, HVAC, conduit and miscellaneous supports appeared to be in satisfactorycondition.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 7 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NF UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area 241

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ ND: U[-- N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No potentiallyadverse seismic spatial interactionswere observed.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI ULI N/ADI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No adverse flooding or spray conditions were observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[:] UDI N/AF-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No potentially adverse fire conditions were observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UD1 N/AD1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No adverse seismic interactions were observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 8 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NEI] U[

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area 241

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEIUF1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Generally, fill conditions in cable trays, HVAC, conduit and miscellaneoussupports appeared to be in satisfactorycondition with no adverse conditions observed.

Evaluated by: DanielAndoh26- Date: 10/9/2012 Daniel Parker 10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 9 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NE-] U-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area 241 SWEL Components: SWELl- 002 (2F-6A)

Photographs Note: Overhead support conditions

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 10 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area 241 SWEL Components: SWELl- 002 Note: Overhead support conditions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page I1 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YEI NZ ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area' 2055 SWEL Components: SWELl- 003(2SI-5091-3)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEi UE1 N/A[:]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions were observed in equipment anchoragesin the area.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YM NEI U[-- N/A[--

significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions were observed in equipment anchoragesin the area.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UEl N/A--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays appeared to have adequate fill conditions. No adverse seismic conditions were observed in pipe, HVAC and conduit supports.

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 12 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YEI NZ U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2055

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[9 N[:] U[] N/AE-]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There is a light fixture about 6ft away that has chain supports that snake aroundpipes and have open "S"hooks. CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 initiated.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UE1 N/AE interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No potential sources of flooding or spray was observed. There are floor drains in the room.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE_ UEi N/A[E]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No potential fire source was observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NE] U[iE N/A[E interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No adverse seismic conditions were observed due to housekeeping, storage of equipment and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 13 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE- NZ U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2055

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cable trays appearedto be in good condition with no observed overfilling. Pipe supports appeared to be in good condition and properly spaced. Miscellaneoussteel supports and their anchorages appearedto be in good condition.

Evaluated by: Daniel Andoh Date: 10/4/2012 Daniel Parker 10/4/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 14 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YD- NO U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2055 SWEL Components: SWELl- 003 Photoqraphs Note: Overhead conditions. Note: Floordrain.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 15 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YElI NE 0LD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 - Room, Area 2055 SWEL Components': SWEILl- 003 Note: Overhead condition with cable tray. Note: Adjacent floor anchorages.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 16 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YM NEII ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area' 2096 SWEL Components: SWELl- 006 (2B-63)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN N[-] uE- N/A[:

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN N[:] U[I N/A[:

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U[:1 N/AE1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC and pipe supports appeared to be adequateand in good condition. Cable trays were not overfilled and appearto be adequately supported.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 17 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U[--1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area2 2096

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[I N/A[D spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

An open S-hook on a fluorescent light fixture was observed near 2VUC-20A. This light could potentially cause interactioneffects in the room.

CR-ANO-2-2012-02664 initiated.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NlE ULi N/AED interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YER NEI U[_ N/A[-]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI UD N/AD1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A ladderstored in the room is anchored to the wall with a chain, and is stored on the ground, so it does not present an interactioneffect.

2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 18 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NoI UD]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area3 2096

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UL-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A CR was written for the open S-hook observed in the room. The proposed method of resolutionis to close the S-hook.

Evaluated by: Genaro BarraganJr. Date: 10/8/2012 Eric Dilbone 6 1- 10/8/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 19 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[J NEI] UF-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area4 2096 SWEL Components: SWELl- 006 (2B-63)

Photographs Note: View of the front of the MCC, 2B-63. Note: View of the equipment adjacentto the MCC, 2B-63.

4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 20 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ Ni-] UoL Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Areas 2096 SWEL Components: SWELl- 006 (2B-63)

Open S-hook Note: View from the MCC looking towards the Note: View of the open S-hook observed in back of the room. the room light fixture.

5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 21 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ No Ul--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Area' 2100 SWEL Components: SWELl- 005 (2B-674), 007 (2B-6).SWEL1 -009 (2X-26). SWELl -055 (2VUC-2B)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UE] N/A[-

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in area is in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UZ! N/A--

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment is free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U[-1 N/A[-]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Tray and conduit are adequately supported.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 22 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y] ND- UD1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Area2 2100

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[-D NZ UD1 N/Al1 spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

A light fixture was found to be resting against2LS-8654-2A (ABHVAC 2VUC-2A) CR-ANO-2-2012-02664 has been initiated.An open s-hook was found above 2B-64 (MOTOR CONTROL CENTER) in RAB, EL.

372, Room 2100 CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 has been initiated.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[1 U[-1 N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There is no flooding or spray source.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UD" N/AD]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

There is no fire source besides transformers in room.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[D1 UD1 N/Ar1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The fire extinguisheris secure.

2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 23 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area3 2100

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NW] ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Roy Berrymar ' Date: 10/3/2012 Sean SmolarekA ' " 10/3/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 24 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN N[* UM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area4 2100 SWEL Components: SWELl- 005 (2B-674), 007 (2B-6),SWEL1 -009 (2X-26). SWELl -055 (2VUC-2B)

Photographs 4If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 25 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y*; N[-' UD" Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Areas 2100 SWEL Components: SWELl- 005 (2B-674), 007 (2B-6),SWELl -009 (2X-26), SWELl -055 (2VUC-2B) 1 Note: Overhead Lighting Note: Overhead View 5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 26 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Area' 2097 SWEL Components: SWELl- 008 (2D-52)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UF"] N/A[-

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in areais in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y; NEJ UED N/A[-

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment is free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UE1 N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Tray and conduit are adequatelysupported in room.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 27 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ N[-] U[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area2 2097

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NE] Ur- N/A[-

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There are no ceiling tiles in the room. There is 1 open s-hook in the room. CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 has been initiated

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y; NEI uEF N/A[D interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There is no flooding or spray source.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI UE] N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

There is no fire source.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[- N/AD' interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The fire extinguisheris secure. Scaffold in area is secure and tagged properly.

2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 28 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ Nr-- UZ--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area3 2097

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other adverse seimic conditions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/3/2012 Sean Smolarek 10/3/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 29 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ No"U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area4 2097 SWEL Components: SWELl- 008 (2D-52)

Photographs

_ II Note: Component Tag Note: Overview of Component 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 30 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YM NF U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Area5 2097 SWEL Components: SWELl- 008 (D-_52)

Note: Overhead Lighting S-hooks Note: Room Overview 5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 31 of 251 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Areal 2093 SWEL Components: SWELl - 010(2P-168A), 019(2PCV-2923), 039(2SV-2811), 049(2E-128A),

061(2K-4A), 063(2M-205A), 064(2M-67A), 069(2PS-2917B). 074(2SE-2801), 077(2E-12). 098(2T-31A)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UI N/A[Z potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No anchorage issues identified. A Support East of 2E12 cabinet has.

bolt holes that appearto be missing bolts, upon further inspection welds were observed to an embedded plate.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U[-I N/A[--

significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions identified other than mild surface oxidation on anchors.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN N[E UEi N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

There is tray in room, conduit supports and ducting that is all supported well.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 32 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NEI UI--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area2 2093

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEi Ul N/AEl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No tiles in room, conduits, trays, and lights are supported well except one open s-hook near fire door 262, diesel exhaust fan, and M-267A.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UiE N/A-]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Fuel Oil Day Tank in room and fire suppresion system.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U[-- N/AE!

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Fuel Oil Day Tank and fuel in diesel engine potentialfire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEi U[-] N/A[-

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

2 Scaffolds are in room, they have been evaluated by engineeringand tagged for seismic; therefore, no issue. No other housekeeping issues identified.

2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 33 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ N[] UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area3 2093 Bldg.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[E UEI--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse conditions found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/11/2012 Genaro BarraganJr. 10/11/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 34 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 - Room, Area4 2093 SWEL Components: SWELl- 010(2P-168A), 019(2PCV-2923), 039(2SV-2811), 049(2E-128A).

061(2K-4A), 063(2M-205A), 064(2M-67A), 069(2PS-2917B). 074(2SE-2801), 077(2E-1 2). 098(2T-31PA)

Photoaraohs F

Note: Open S-hook Overhead Note: Area Overview 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 35 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UI-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area5 2093 SWEL Components: SWELl - 01 0(2P-168A), 019(2PCV-2923), 039(2SV-2811), 049(2E-1 28A),

061(2K-4A). 063(2M-205A). 064(2M-67A). 069(2PS-2917B). 074(2SE-2801). 077(2E-12). 098(2T-31A) 1 Note: Area Overview- Observe Scaffolding in Note: Equipment in Area

Background

5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 36 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y; NO U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008_

Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. 329 - Room, Area' 254 SWEL Components: SWELl - 011 (2P-1 6B)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[E N[: U[-] N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

There is one grounding wire anchorin which its support appearsto be loose. The wire is located on the ground, which will result in no adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI ULI N/AW significant degraded conditions?

Some of the anchorbolts supportingthe fuel tank in the area show signs of mild corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NIl U[-] N/AW-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC ducting and conduit raceways are adequatelysupported.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 37 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO NFI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 254

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE N[I ULi N/A-I spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There are no tiles in the ceiling area. Lighting appearsto be in adequate conditions.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U-- N/AZ-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Tank and fire lines are supportedproperly. Note that these supports are in different configuration than the other tank rooms, but are also found in adequateconditions. Thus, it is unlikely for adverse seismic interactionsthat can cause flooding.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[l U[- N/A[:-

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The fuel tank appearsto be in proper conditions,which is why it is unlikely for adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire to occur in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI ur- N/A[-

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Area is free from potentiallyadverse seismic conditions associatedwith the descriptionsabove.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 38 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y] NEI U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 254

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEIUn adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

All items pertainingto this area appearto be in adequateconditions.

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/9/2012 Michael E. Perez 10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 39 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NIMZ ULIM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 254 SWEL Components: SWELl- 011 (2P-16B)

Photographs Note: Anchor bolt on the ground appearsto be Note: Anchorage for fuel tank in the room loose. appearsto have some surface oxidation. No adverse seismic impacts.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 40 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NM U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008_

Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 254 SWEL Components: SWEILl- 011 (2P-1 6B)

Note: Lighting fixtures appearto be in Note: Conduit is properly installed in the area.

adequate conditions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 41 of 251 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[ N[] UD'-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area' 2007 SWEL Components: SWELl- 012 (2P-60B), SWELl-097 (2E-52B)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NM U[F- N/A[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions were observed in equipment anchoragesin the area.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UEi N/A[-'

significant degraded conditions?

No degradedconditions were observed in equipment anchoragesin the area.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ N[E UE- N/AE[-

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays appearedto have adequate fill conditions. No adverse seismic conditions were observed in pipe, HVAC and conduit supports.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 42 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N[:] UL Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2007

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] UE] N/A-]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No adverse seismic spatialinteractionsfrom other equipment were observed.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N['] U[I- N/AE" interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No potential sources of flooding were observed. A floor drain was observed in the vicinity of the pump.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-] N/A[J interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No potentialfire sources were observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI UL[] N/AF-]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffolding was in place. Chains and hooks from an overhead hoist were hanging down in an unsecured condition. A wrench was observed on the floor adjacentto the pump. These conditions were observed while work was being done during the outage. They have been confirmed to be clearand securedin normal operatingconditions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 43 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF UFI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2007

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cable trays appearedto be in good condition with no observed overfilling. Pipe supports appearedto be in good condition and properly spaced. Miscellaneous steel supports and their anchorages appeared to be in good condition.

Evaluated by: Daniel Andoh Date: 9/29/2012 Daniel Parker 9/29/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 44 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UDF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 - Room, Area 2007 SWEL Components: SWELl- 012 (2P-60B), SWELl-097 (2E-52B)

Photographs Note: Permanentoverhead trolley with Note: Permanentoverhead trolley with unsecured chains and hooks. unsecured chains and hooks.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 45 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE] U0 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2007 SWEL Components: SWELl- 012 (2P-60B), SWELl-097 (2E-52B)

Note: Over head area view

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 46 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[* NEI--j ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Areal 2009 SWEL Components: SWELl- 013 (2P-89B)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NE-] UE[ N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage is properly installed and found free from adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[E N/AE-significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditionsfound in the anchorage of the area.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ N[: UE- N/A--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable/conduitraceways present no seismic effect to the equipment in the area.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 47 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE] NF- U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2009

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEi ULi N/AE-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No specific spatialinteractionsare apparentin this area during a seismic event.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NlE ULi N/AEI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding hazards found in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI url N/A[-D interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UEi N/A--

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area is free of adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeepingpractices. There are no temporary installationsor portable equipment stored in the area.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 48 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y ] NEI UrD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2009

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEi UL-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

There are no other seismic conditions in the vicinity that can affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Piping and other flexible lines are properly placed. These do not show any sign of damaging the safety functions of the equipment during a safety hazard.

Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqanJr.

• Date: 9/29/2012 Michael E. Perez * -.*--- 09/29/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 49 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NI U-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2009 SWEL Components: SWELl- 013 (2P-89B)

Photographs Note: The overall condition of the area is free Note: No direct flooding or fire hazards from possible seismic hazards. apparentthat can affect the equipment's safety functions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 50 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ N1 UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2009 SWEL Components: SWELl- 013 (2P-89B)

Note: Cables/conduitsdo not present a Note:

hazard to the equipment item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 51 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NL:]I UOF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 366 Room, Areal 2207 SWEL Components: SWELl- 014 (2P-4A)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[' N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Flow of wateris creating an environment for potential corrosion.

Significant corrosion was not observed.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN N[E ur-l N/AZ-]

significant degraded conditions?

No corrosion beyond mild surface oxidation was observed

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NEI UE-1 N/AZ--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Fill conditions in cable trays, HVAC, conduit and miscellaneous supports appearto be in satisfactory condition.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 52 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN N[I Ur-D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011_

Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 366 Room, Area 2207

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE] N/A[-]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswere observed.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE] N/AE]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Flow of wateris creating an environment for potentialcorrosion.

Significantcorrosion was not observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI ULIE N/AE[-

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No potentialfire sources were observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[I N/A[-]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Heavy tools and brackets are stored on open hooks on adjacent wall (see picture). Consideringthe size of the components in the room and the relatively small size of the tools as well as the distance between the tools and the component, there is no adverse seismic condition

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 53 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YD] NI uFi-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 366 Room, Area 2207

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y~N N[UrL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Conduit and pipe supports, and also fill conditions in cable trays, appeared to be adequate.

Evaluated by: Daniel Andoh V Date: 10/9/2012 Daniel Parker 10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 54 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ No U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 366 Room, Area 2207 SWEL Components: SWELl- 014 (2P-4A)

Photographs 4 .V Note: Tools and brackets stored on open Note: Mild corrosion of base plates and hooks anchors at pump 2P-4B due to constant water flow.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 55 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE] UD-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 366 Room, Area 2207 SWEL Components: SWELl- 014 (2P-4A)

I Note: Overhead conditions. Note: Overhead conditions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 56 of 251 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NM U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 _

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 - Room, Area' 2013 SWEL Components: SWELl- 015 (2CV-2601-2). SWELl-053 (2VUC-1C)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items.

The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI U[L N/A[l potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in area is in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI U[L N/ALJ significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment is free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NEI UEL N/A--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Tray and conduit are adequately supportedin room.

IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 57 of 251 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NEI UIu Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2013

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NE"I U[- N/A-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area appearsto be free of spatial interactions.

I

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE- N/AF]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There is no flooding or spray source.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI ULI N/ALr interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The areaappears to be free of potentially adverse interactionsthat could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UI N/A[']

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There are no temporaryinstallationsor portable equipment in the area.

Housekeeping practices are acceptable.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 58 of 251 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YM NEIl U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2013

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[E N[- U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no otheradverse seimic conditions were found.

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

There are no adverse seismic interactionsanticipatedwith this equipment. This piece of equipment is located overhead and in a piping system that is not affected by other components in the room.

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 9/27/2012 Eric Dilbone 9/27/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 59 of 251 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NEIl U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2013 SWEL Components: SWELl- 015 (2CV-2601-2). SWELl -053 (2VUC-IC)

Photographs Note: Overhead Motor Operator Note: Overhead View

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 60 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NIo Ur Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 356 - Room, Areal 2081 SWEL Components: SWELl- 016 (2CV-3851-1), 038 (2SV-1066-1), 041 (2SV-3852-1)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U[-- N/A[--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions were observed in equipment anchoragesin the area.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[K N[l U-- N/AE-significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions were observed in equipment anchoragesin the area.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ N[:] UFE N/AF-I raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays appearedto have adequate fill conditions. No adverse seismic conditions were observed in pipe, HVAC and conduit supports.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 61 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 356 Room, Area 2081

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[D] N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No adverse seismic spatial interactionsfrom other equipment were observed.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UiD N/ADl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No potentialsources of flooding were observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[- N/ADJ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI UiD N/ADl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices,storage of portableequipment and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 62 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NrI" UE-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 356 Room, Area 2081

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

There is a chain from an overhead motor operator. This does not present a seismic concern. All anchorage observed in the area was shown to be free from corrosion and concrete cracks. Cables and conduits are all properlyinstalled throughout the area. Housekeeping is maintainedthroughout the room.

Evaluated by: DanielAndoh Date: 10/4/2012 Michael E. Perez - 10/4/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 63 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UF-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 356 - Room, Area 2081 SWEL Components: SWELl- 016 (2CV-3851-1). 038 (2SV-1066-1). 041 (2SV-3852-1)

Photographs Note: All anchorage in the area has been Note: Cables and conduits in the area appear shown to be in adequate conditions. to be properly installed to concrete walls and ceilings. No potential seismic hazards have been observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 64 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 356 - Room, Area 2081 SWEL Components: SWELl- 016 (2CV-3851-1). 038 (2SV-1066-1), 041 (2SV-3852-1)

Note: All overhead equipment in the area is Note:

shown to be properly installed and secure, reducing the likelihood of spatial interactions during a seismic event.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 65 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NFJI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 442 Room, Area ROOF SWEL Components: SWELl- 018 (2CV-8284-2)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y; NE-I U[: N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

There was a similar component and piping system penetrationnear 2CV-8284-2. This would not be expected to pose a hazard to the inspected component during seismic event.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y ] NEI U-- N/A[-]

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage appears to be free of significantly degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ N[:] uEF N/AZ-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

2CV-8284-2 is an in-line component on a pipe system on the outside of the Unit 2 Containment wall above the Aux Building roof.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 66 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI UI F-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 442 Room, Area ROOF

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UII! N/AEI spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The component is outside on the Aux Building roof, and the only other component in the area is not a spatialinteraction issue.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UIZ N/AEJ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The component is raisedabove the roof on metal grating, so it is not likely to be affected by any flooding or spray on the roof. Additionally, this component is located outside and is exposed to the environment, Le. rain.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[I] U[I N/Al]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The component is raisedabove the roof on metal grating, so it is not likely to be affected by fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEi UI' N/A-]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Maintenance items were at various locations about the observation platform but they appeared to be part of an ongoing work order.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 67 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ N U-il Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 442 Room, Area ROOF

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Daniel Parker * " Date: 10/10/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 68 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NR U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 442 Room, Area ROOF SWEL Components: SWELl- 018 (2CV-8284-2)

Photographs Note: Pipe penetration outside containment Note: Pipe penetrationoutside containment wall with component 2CV-8284-2. wall with component 2CV-8284-2.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 69 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NRI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 442 Room, Area ROOF SWEL Components: SWELl- 018 (2CV-8284-2)

Note: Containment roof access ladder above Note:

observation platform.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 70 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NI- U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area, 2155 SWEL Components: SWELl- 020 (2PSV-1 054). 028 (2CV-1 052)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NI] U[-1 N/A[-

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Adjacent equipment anchoragesappeared to be in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEJ U-it N/At]

significant degraded conditions?

No significantlydegraded conditions were observed.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE N[-] u[r- N/At-]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Control panel Item 2NI43 has a missing rubber cover on one of its buttons. However, this does not present a potentially adverse seismic condition.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 71 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NIE U[7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-015 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 2155

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UF- N/A[:]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswere observed.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE Nil UD"7 N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

A fire hose is present in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UD N/A[-D interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI UD1 N/A[D]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There was a bag in the area that containedremoved equipment, full of insulation. A Temporary Services and Equipment (TSE) Tag was attached to the bag making it acceptable to leave unattended.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 72 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF- U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 2155

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nil UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

All anchorage in the area is secure. No signs of degradationhave been observed. Aside from the issue involving Item 2NI43, HVAC ducting, cables and conduits in the area are properly secured.

Evaluated by: Michael E. Perez . Date: 10/10/2012 Sean SmolarekZ," 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 73 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE] NFil UFL Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 - Room, Area 2155 SWELComponents: SWELh-020(2PSV-1054).028(2CV-1052)

Photographs Note: Anchorage in the area has been shown Note: Item 2NI43 contains a button with a to be free from adverse seismic conditions and missing rubber cover and may need to be signs of degradation. fixed. As far as HVAC ducting, cable trays, and conduits, they appearto be properly secured in the area.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 74 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NI I U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 - Room, Area 2155 SWEL Components: SWELl- 020 (2PSV-1 054), 028 (2CV-1 052)

Note: Minor dents were observed in the Note: Bag containing removed components insulation. This has been determined to be a from an insulated piece of equipment.

non-issue.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 75 of 251 Sheet I of 4 Status: YN NF- UW Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 016 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 391 Room, Area' 200 SWEL Components: SWELl- 021 (2PSV-4633)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ N-I u[-] N/AW' potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U[ N/AW-significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage shows no signs of corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[g NW] UW N/A[--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 76 of 251 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NF- U[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 016 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 391 Room, Area 200

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[E LIE N/AEI spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U[E N/A[--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No source of spray was observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[-] UE- N/AE-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause .a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[E1 UE N/AE interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No temporary installationswere observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 77 of 251 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN NEI UE-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-016 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 391 Room, Area 200

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

All items in the area seemed to be in appropriateorder and the anchorageconditions were free of corrosion.

Evaluated by: Genaro BarraganJr. Date: 9/28/2012 Eric Dilbone 9/28/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 78 of 251 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NE-] U-IrI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 016 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 391 Room, Area 200 SWEL Components: SWELl- 021 (2PSV-4633)

PhotoaraDhs Note: Generalimage of area above valve. Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 79 of 251 Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ NEI- U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 017 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area, 2118- Back SWEL Components: SWELl- 081(2C23-C), 075(2TC-8666-2). 040(2SV-3668-2), 004 (2VFP-45B)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[E N[-] UE] N/A[-

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NEI U[: N/A--

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NEI UD- N/A[--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

The only thing visible from the ground was ceiling tiles, which all appearedto be a non-issue during a seismic event.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 80 of 251 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NEI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 017 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area2 2118- Back

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE-] UE- N/A--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

All lighting is recessed in the ceiling, and attachment cannot be seen without removing ceiling tiles. There is no reason to suspec that it is not properly anchored.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE1 N/A['-

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE' N/A[-]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The areaappears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE1 N/AZ1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Personal,Self-Contained BreathingApparatus airtanks were placed in a storage rack. During a large seismic event these tanks may bounce out of their racks and drop to the floor. This was judged to be a non-issue. See comments section for additionalinformation.

2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 81 of 251 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ NF U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 017 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area3 2118 - Back

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NI] U[I-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The area appeared to be free of any adverse spatial interactionsthat may occur during a seismic event.

The overheaddrop ceiling tiles were a light-weight composition that would not pose a significantrisk if they were to fall during a seismic event.

Personal,Self-Contained BreathingApparatus air tanks were placed in a storage rack. During a large seismic event these tanks may bounce out of their racks and drop to the floor. These tanks were of composite construction,less than 5 lbs each. This was judged not to be of significantrisk to critical equipment within the area.

Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 10/4/2012 Sean Smolarek 10/4/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 82 of 251 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U --

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 017 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area4 2118- Back SWEL Components: SWELl- 081(2C23-C), 075(2TC-8666-2), 040(2SV-3668-2). 004 (2VFP-45B)

Photographs Note: Overhead drop ceiling with light-weight Note: PersonalSelf Contained Breathing composition tiles. Apparatus air tanks in storage rack.

4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 83 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NJ UOF1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area' 2043 SWEL Components: SWELl- 023 (2CV-0340-2)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI U-I N/A[:

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage in the area appears to be free of any potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[-- N/AF-significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U[:] N/AZ--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

The area appearsto be free of any potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWVEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 84 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ ND- UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 - Room, Area 2043

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[i- N/A-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ ND ur- N/AD-]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO ND Ul- N/A[

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN Nr LID N/AD:]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices,etc.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 85 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NiE UL--]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2043

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Based on the observationsperformed, no other adverse seismic conditions have been found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

All anchoragein the area is properly secured. No signs of degradedconditions, no other signs that would provoke a fire or flooding hazard have been found in the room. HVAC ducting, cables, and conduits that have been found in the overhead appearedto be properly secured. No housekeeping issues have been observed.

Evaluated by: Daniel Parker ýrP ",Date: 10/8/2012 Michael E. Perez - 10/8/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 86 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YM NEI UM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2043 SWEL Components: SWELl- 023 (2CV-0340-2)

Photographs Note: Anchorage appearsto be in adequate Note: Lighting in the area is shown to be free conditions. from adverse spatial interactions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 87 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI] UI'-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2043 SWEL Components: SWELl- 023 (2CV-0340-2)

Note: Overhead equipment is shown to be Note: Housekeeping conditions are adequate.

properly secured with steel beams and variable anchoragein orderto reduce spatial interactions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 88 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ Ni] UF]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 329 Room, Area' 2024 SWEL Components: SWELl- 024 (2CV-0711-2). 037 (2SV-0317-2), 101 (2VUC-6A)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ Nil] UEr N/A[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

One of the largeyellow steel beams has one bolt that is missing in one of its anchoragesto the concrete wall. It appears that a steel plate has been welded (full pen) to the plate to replace a fourth bolt; therefore this does not present an adverse seismic condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y9 NEI U'- N/AE1 significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U-I N/A[:]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

The area appears to be free of any potentially adverse seismic conditions.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 89 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ Nil] U-'

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 019_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 329 - Room, Area 2024

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[l N/ALI spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There are two lighting fixtures in the area, which can easily come in contact with othernearby equipment during a seismic event.

Consideringthe light weight of the light and the mass of the adjacent components, there is not seismic concern

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[E NEI U[- N/A--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI LI UI N/AI-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No potentially adverse seismic integrations were observed that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN Nr- U[:] N/AF-1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A temporary hose was present during the walkdown. This does not present an adverse seismic interaction.Additionally, the hose is covered in caution flagging.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 90 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 2024

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEi ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Based on the observationsperformed, no other adverse seismic conditionshave been found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: GernaroBarraganJr. Date: 10/2/2012 Michael E. Perez 10/2/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 91 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NF U[

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 2024 SWEL Components: SWELl- 024 (2CV-0711-2). 037 (2SV-0317-2). 101 (2VUC-6A)

Photographs Note: Massive steel beam that is anchored to Note: Two lighting fixtures are found to be in a the wall has one bolt missing. It seems that this tight space. These lights are light in weight has been remedied by welding to it an extra compared to adjacent components.

steel plate to accommodate a fourth bolt.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 92 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YO NEI] UI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 2024 SWEL Components: SWELl- 024 (2CV-0711-2). 037 (2SV-0317-2). 101 (2VUC-6A)

Note: There seems to be an oil leakage near Note: A temporary hose was present during item 2P-7A. This is not a seismic hazard. the walkdown. This does not presentan adverse seismic interaction. The hose is covered in caution flagging to minimize the tripping hazard to personnel.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 93 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YN NF U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 020 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 329 Room, Area, 2025 SWEL Components: SWELl- 025 (2CV-0789-1). 070 (2PT-0710-1)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI U-- N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y] NEI U-- N/A-significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the areaappears to be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEIl UW N/A-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC ducting and cable/conduitraceways appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 94 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ N-- U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 020_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 2025

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI uEr N/Ar-E spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There are no spatial interactionsidentified.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UE1 N/A'-

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

A floor drainis present in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[E UE1 N/AE-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Oil stains has been found in the area nearItem 2CV-0789-1. This does not present an adverse seismic condition that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEl UE- N/AE[

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The scaffold in the room was adequately tagged in Room 2025.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 95 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YED NEI UIur Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 020 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 2025

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

An oil stain found near Item 2CV-0789-1. This does not present an adverse seismic condition. Other items in the area appearto be in good conditions and free from adverse seismic conditions.

Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqanJr. -A-1411 Date: 10/2/2012 Michael E. Perez <- ... 10/2/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 96 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UF-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 020 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 2025 SWEL Components: SWELl- 025 (2CV-0789-1). 070 (2PT-0710-1)

Photographs Note: Oil leakage is present near Item 2CV- Note: All anchoragefound in overhead 0789-1. This can propagatea fire hazard if it equipment appearto be free from adverse were to ever occur. seismic conditions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 97 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ Nil] UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 020 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 2025 SWEL Components: SWELl- 025 (2CV-0789-1). 070 (2PT-0710-1)

Note: Temporary scaffold is properly installed Note: A rubberhose has been found in a in Room 2025. walking area,just outside of Room 2025.

Although this may not be a seismic hazard, this may be a tripping/fallinghazard.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 98 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YE] No ul-i Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 021 Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Areal N/A SWEL Components: NONE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEi UiE N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YEI NEI U['] N/A[-'

significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE-] NEi UEr N/AE-I raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 99 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE] NF U' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 021_

Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A - Room, Area N/A

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[-] N[i U[_ N/AF-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YIE] NEi UE- N/A[--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[:] N[:] ULI N/A[--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[-- NEI uE-1 N/AF-1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 100 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE- NE- U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 021 Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area N/A

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] NE] UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: _ Date:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 101 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO- NO- Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 021 Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area N/A SWEL Components: NONE Photographs Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 102 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE- NM UDI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 021 Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A - Room, Area N/A SWEL Components: NONE Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 103 of 251 Sheet I of 6 Status: Y] NEI UF]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 022_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 360 - Room, Area' 2084 SWEL Components: SWELl -027 (2CV-1 025-1). SWELl -033 (2CV-5036-2). SWELl -042 (2SV-4823-2). SWELl-046 (2SV-8271-2)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y] NEI Ur] N/Ar-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage is properlyinstalled and found free from adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[-] N/A-1 significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions found in the anchorageof the area.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ N[1 Ur] N/A[]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable/conduitraceways present no seismic effect to the equipment in the area.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 104 of 251 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NI- UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 022_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 360 - Room, Area 2084

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N['- UL- N/AFI spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No specific spatialinteractionsare apparentin this area during a seismic event.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UL- N/A[I interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] U-I N/AE-'

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE: UE- N/AZ-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area is free of adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices. There are no temporary installationsor portable equipment stored in the area.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 105 of 251 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YN NEI- U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 022 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 360 Room, Area 2084

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other adverse seimic conditions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cable trays appeared to be in good condition with no observed overfilling. Pipe supports appearedto be in good condition and properly spaced. Miscellaneous steel supports and their anchorages appearedto be in good condition.

Evaluated by: DanielAndoh Date: 10/4/2012 Daniel Parker 10/4/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 106 of 251 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YE] NEI u[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 022 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 360 Room, Area 2084 SWEL Components: SWELl-027 (2CV-1025-1). SWELl-033 (2CV-5036-2). SWELI-042 (2SV-4823-2). SWELl-046 (2SV-8271-2)

Photographs Note: General Overview

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 107 of 251 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: Y[ ND U-'

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 022 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 360 Room, Area 2084 SWEL Components: SWELl -027 (2CV-1025-1), SWELl -033 (2CV-5036-2). SWELl -042 (2SV-4823-2). SWELl-046 (28V-8271-2)

Photographs Note: Overhead Lighting Note: General Overview

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 108 of 251 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YE NE] U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 022 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 360 Room, Area 2084 SWEL Components: SWELl-027 (2CV-1025-1). SWELl-033 (2CV-5036-2), SWELl-042 (2SV-4823-2). SWELl-046 (2SV-8271-2)

Note: General Overview Note: General Overview

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 109 of 251 Sheet I of 7 Status: YN NEI UD" Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 366 Room, Area' 2208 SWEL Components: SWELl- 029 (2CV-1422-2)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UE- N/A[E]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Generally equipment anchorage appearedto be in good.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[E NE] u[-1 N/A[D-significant degraded conditions?

No significant degradedconditions were observed.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEl uE- N/A--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Fill conditionsin cable trays, HVAC, conduit and miscellaneous supports on both levels appearedto be in satisfactory condition.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 110 of 251 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: Y] NF U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 023_

Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 366 - Room, Area 2208

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N- UL- N/AE spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U- N/AE interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No potentiallyadverse seismic interactionscausing spray or flooding were observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YER NE U-i N/AE:]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No potentially adverse seismic interactionscausing fire were observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[-E N/AE interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No adverse seismic interactionswere observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 111 of 251 Sheet 3 of 7 Status: Y[ NE] U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 366 Room, Area 2208

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEIUE_

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Generalconditions of anchoragesand seismic conditions appeared to be satisfactory.

Evaluated by: DanielAndoh Date: 10/9/2012 Daniel Parker 10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 112 of 251 Sheet 4 of 7 Status: YZ NEI UI1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 366 Room, Area 2208 SWEL Components: SWELl- 029 (2CV-1422-2)

Photographs Note: Floormounted anchorages Note: Overhead conditions

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 113 of 251 Sheet 5 of 7 Status: YZ N'-D U-'

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 366 Room, Area 2208 SWEL Components: SWELl- 029 (2CV-1422-2)

Note: Overhead conditions

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 114 of 251 Sheet 6 of 7 Status: YZ NW1 ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 366 Room, Area 2208 SWEL Components: SWELl- 029 (2CV-1422-2)

Note: Overhead support conditions at Note: Equipment floor anchoragesat Elevation 366 Elevation 366

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 115 of 251 Sheet 7 of 7 Status: Y[ NRo] U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 366 Room, Area 2208 SWEL Components: SWELl- 029 (2CV-1422-2)

Note: Cable tray fill conditions at Elevation Note: MCC and conduits at Elevation 366 366

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 116 of 251 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: Y[9 NE] UD[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 024 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 - Room, Area SWEL Components: SWEI-l- 030 (2C V-I 470-1)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEl u[-] N/A[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

In general the equipment in the area is free from potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ N[E] ur-] N/AZ-significant degraded conditions?

Rotting wood boards were observed under the adjacentequipment shed. This does not present an adverse seismic concern due to the small size of the shed and the distance from the components.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE-] N[E] UE- N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

The equipment is located outside.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 117 of 251 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Y[ NEIIurUn Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 024 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UE'] N/A[D spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adjacent storage building is anchoreddown with angles and four small bolts.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI U-] N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There are no adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[; NH] UF] N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No potentiallyadverse seismic conditions relating to fire was observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[l U[- N/A-'

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions related to housekeeping practices, storageof portable equipment and temporaryinstallations were observed

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 118 of 251 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: Y[ NIF U-II Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 024 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[:]UU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Degraded wood planks below an adjacent equipment shed were observed. It was judged that during a seismic event, this shed would not move far enough to impact adjacent equipment.

Evaluated by: DanielAndoh Date: 10/9/2012 Daniel Parkei I Q - 10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 119 of 251 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: Y[9 NEI iUi]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 024 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area SWEL Components: SWELl- 030 (2CV-1470-1)

Photographs Note: Adjacent equipment supports Note: Mild corrosionin adjacent equipment supports.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 120 of 251 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: Y[ NE-] uLI]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 024 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area SWEL Components: SWEILl- 030 (2CV-1470-1)

Note: Wood supports under adjacent Note: Uplift anchorfor adjacent equipment equipment shed. shed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 121 of 251 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YZ* NE-Il U[--

(AWC) AWC- 024 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area SWEL Components: SWELl- 030 (2CV-1470-1)

Note: Base of Traveling Water Screens IMUM. OUJJ)JLUfI UUFI ons at base of adjacent equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 122 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N'-] UO[:

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 025 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 391 Room, Area, 200 SWEL Components: SWELl- 031 (2CV-4698-1)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[- N/AD1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

The concrete under the base plate of a rigid supporthad visible cracking. Due to the location of the cracked concrete, it is not likely that the anchoragefor the plate is affected. See photo on page 4.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ ND: U[iD N/A[--

significant degraded conditions?

The anchorageof equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degradedconditions. The cracked concrete was noted above, but does not directly run through the base plate anchorage.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NDI UD- N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 123 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI] o-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 025 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 391 - Room, Area 200

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NO] U[- N/AE-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] U-] N/AEI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No source of spray was observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[] UE] N/AE]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] UE- N/AE]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No temporary installationswere observed.

Engineeiring Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 124 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI Ur-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 025 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 391 Room, Area 200

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NF-ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

All items in the area were inspected and appearedto be in appropriateconditions.

Evaluated by: Genaro Barra-ianJr. Date: 9/28/2012 Eric Dilbone 9/28/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 125 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ No] U-i Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 025 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 391 Room, Area 200 SWEL Components: SWELl- 031 (2CV-4698-1)

Photographs Note: The concrete under the base plate of a Note: Image of rigid support.

rigid-supporthad a visible cracking. Due to the location of the crack, the anchorage is not adversely affected.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 126 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NEI] UFI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 025 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 391 Room, Area 200 SWEL Components: SWELl- 031 (2CV-4698-1)

Note: Lines with adequate flexibility

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 127 of 251 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UD-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 1 2053 SWEL Components: SWELl- 032 (2CV-4950-2)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items.

The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YS NEI uE- N/A[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in areais in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UEl N/AE]

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment is free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NEI UE] N/AE-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Tray and conduit are adequatelysupported in room.

IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 128 of 251 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NO UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2053

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N[-] U[D] N/A[--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area appearsto be free of spatial interactions.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ N["D uI N/A-1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There is no flooding or spray source.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN ND:] UD: N/AD1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse interactionsthat could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI ur- N/ADI interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There are no temporary installationsorportable equipment in the area.

Housekeepingpractices are acceptable.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 129 of 251 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NO UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2053

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[-] Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other adverse seimic conditions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

There is a seismic rated block wall directly next to component that appears very capable of supporting the room.

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 9/27/2012 Eric Dilbone 9/27/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 130 of 251 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y] NEI- Uni-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2053 SWEL Components: SWELl- 032 (2CV-4950-2)

Photographs Note: Overview of Area Note: Tagged Valve

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 131 of 251 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YN NDI UD-'

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 027_

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 336 - Room, Area' 270 SWEL Components: SWELl- 034 (2CV-5084-1)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UD- N/ADl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NDI UDl N/AD-significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage shows no signs of corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NDI U[D] N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 132 of 251 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ Nio] Ur-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 027 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 336 Room, Area 270

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ Nil] Ui N/A[:]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Rigid I-beams supportthe ceiling. See photo on page 4.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UEi N/AI-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Valve is located high up and under grating with no flooding concerns.

No source of spray was observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U' N/A["l interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NlE U[] N/A[]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No temporary installationswere observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 133 of 251 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ NE U[IO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 027 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 336 Room, Area 270

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

All items in area were well anchored and free of rust and corrosion.

Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqanJr. Date: 9/28/2012 Eric Dilbone 6

• 9/28/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 134 of 251 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ ND U[--1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 027 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 336 Room, Area 270 SWEL Components: SWEL- 034 (2CV-5084-1)

Photographs Note: General image of area. Note: General image of ceiling.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 135 of 251 Sheet i of 4 Status: YN NI UI]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 028_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 - Room, Area' 2054 SWEL Components: SWELl- 035 (2CV-5628-2)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NI UL--] N/A[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Adjacent equipment anchoragesappearedto be in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NI] UE] N/A-significant degraded conditions?

No significantly degradedconditions were observed.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NI] UI-] N/A[-

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 136 of 251 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NR Uo-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 028 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2054

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI U-IE N/A--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswere observed.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI U[I N/A-I interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Valve is located high up and undergrating with no flooding concerns.

No source of spray was observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[! U-I N/AI-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] UEi N/A[-'

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No temporaryinstallationswere observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 137 of 251 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NZ-] U[i Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 028 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2054

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 10/8/2012 Michael E. Perez 10/8/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 138 of 251 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NEIJ U[:]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 028 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2054 SWEL Components: SWELl- 035 (2CV-5628-2)

Photographs Note: View from below EL. 335 Note: Adjacent components 2BS-25 and 2BS-26

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 139 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ ND UD]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 029 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area, 2009 (35 ft. radius from component)

SWEL Components: SWELl-036 (2CV-5650-2)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NDI UD- N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

An anchorageof a steel beam attached to the ceiling has had (3) bolts removed. These bolts have been replaced with welds. It is judged that this weld is an adequatereplacement for the removed bolts.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YED ND- UD-] N/AD1 significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN ND:] U[D] N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

The cable/conduit raceways appearto have adequatefill conditions.

IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 140 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NIF U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 029 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2009 (35 ft. radius from component)

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[K NiE ULI N/A-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N-I U[- N/A-I interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There is a permanent platfrom near the equipment that is supportedby the ceiling, but seismic interactionswith the inspected equipment are very minimal since the anchorage of this equipment is in good conditions.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI ULI N/A[-'

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No fire hazardsfound in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UED N/AEI interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Not only the housekeeping is very good and the temporaryscaffold in the area is well placed, but the area is very. spacious.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 141 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NO UE Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 029 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2009 (35 ft. radius from component)

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ No UE--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqanJr. Date: 9/29/2012 Michael E. Perez 9/29/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 142 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NEI UOF]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 029 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2009 (35 ft. radiusfrom component)

SWEL Components: SWELl-036 (2CV-5650-2)

Photographs Note: The steel beam attachedto the ceiling Note: This steel beam has two bolts removed has three bolts removed. The bolts have been and replaced with welds.

replaced with welds. This support is near valve 2CV-5650-2.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 143 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YO NEI ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 029_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2009 (35 ft. radius from component)

SWEL Components: SWELI -036 (2CV-5650-2)

Note: Permanentplatform properly anchored Note: Temporary equipment is properly stored to the ceiling. in area. The area is also very spacious, reducing possible seismic interactions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 144 of 251 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ N7 U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 030 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 357 Room, Area, Azimuth 190/195 SWEL Components: SWELl- 043 (2SV-5874). SWELl -044 (2SV-5878-1)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U-- N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN N[E uE- N/A[--

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage shows no signs of corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI ur' N/A-D raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 145 of 251 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ N['] Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 030 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 357 Room, Area Azimuth 190/195

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI LiE! N/AEJ spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NE- U-- N/A[:-

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE-] ULI N/A-'

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[Z! UZ- N/AZ!

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary installationswere present due to 2R22.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 146 of 251 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN NEI U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 030 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 357 Room, Area Azimuth 190/195

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Unit currently in refueling outage. Miscellaneousitems are located throughoutthe building as well as the walk-by area. All of these items are temporaty and do not have sufficient mass to damage any components.

Bolts are in good condition. No corrosion was observed.

Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Q" Date: 9/28/2012 Sean Smolarek 9/28/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 147 of 251 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NF" Ul-J Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 030 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 357 Room, Area Azimuth 190/195 SWEL Components: SWELl- 043 (2SV-5874), SWELl-044 (2SV-5878-1)

Photographs Note: Area Overview Note: Observe bucket in distance. Bucket is temporary and lacks mass to damage any components.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 148 of 251 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YN NE-] U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 376 Room, Area' 30 SWEL Components: SWELl- 045 (2SV-1162)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ N[-] U[: N/A[:]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ N[- U[-- N/A--

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage shows no signs of corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UZ- N/AI-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 149 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) ,AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 376 Room, Area 30

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UEJ N/AFl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[I] UEi N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[:] UIZ N/AOl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI UEl N/A[-]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary installationswere present due to 2R22.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 150 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 376 Room, Area 30

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The anchorageof the items in the areaappears to be in good shape and free of any corrosion.

Evaluated by: Genaro Barra-qanJr. Date: 9/28/2012 Eric Dilbone 6Z41. 9/28/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 151 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NEI UR Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 376 Room, Area 30 SWEL Components: SWELl - 045 (2SV-1 162)

Photographs Note: Generalimage of area. Note: Image shows scaffolds and orange mesh fencing maintenanceareas.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 152 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NID UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 376 Room, Area 30 SWEL Components: SWELl- 045 (2SV-1162)

Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 153 of 251 Sheet I of 6 Status: YO NF' UrI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 032_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 - Room, Area, 2139 SWEL Components: SWELl -048 (2C-59). SWELl- 051 (2VE-1B), SWELl-072 (2PT-1506-2).

SWELl -080 (2C1 87) SWELl -090 (2PIC-1 506-2), SWELl -091 (2PS-1 508)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YM NR U[I- N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UD- N/A[D significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NDI u[- N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 154 of 251 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Y[ NE ur-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 032 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2139

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y; NEI UD- N/ADI spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith otherequipment in the area. An open S-hook was observed, but it is not in a position where it could adversely interactwith any equipment.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEO NZ UM N/A--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

It was noted that a valve, 2FS-76, has moderate corrosion,and could potentially become a source of spray or flooding. It has already been tagged with a Work Order that was to be completed by 3/5/2012. CR-ANO-2-2012-02582 initiated.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ N[-1 U[1 N/A--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI ur- N/ADl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interaction associatedwith any of the above.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 155 of 251 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ NEi] UF' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 032 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2139

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI' UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

An open S-hook was observed, but it is not in a position where it could adversely interact with any equipment.

Minor surface corrosion was observed on several cable trays. This corrosion is insignificantand is judged to be acceptable.

Seismic block wall 24-B-234 is the physical boundary of the room. This wall appears to be in general good condition. This block wall is seismically designed and is judged not to be a threat A valve yoke (2FS-76) was observer to have moderate corrosion. A tag indicating work order (WO 213734) scheduled for 3/5/12 was observed.

Evaluated by: Eric Dilbone Date: 10/1/2012 Sean Smolarek 10/1/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 156 of 251 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YN NEI ur Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 032 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2139 SWEL Components: SWELl-048 (2C-59). SWELl- 051 (2VE-1B), SWELl-072 (2PT-1506-2).

SWELl-080 (2C187) SWELl-090 (2PIC-1506-2), SWELl-091 (2PS-1508)

Photographs Note: General Area Note: Seismic Block Wall 24-B-234

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 157 of 251 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YZ NE] Ur-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 032 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2139 SWEL Components: SWELl-048 (2C-59), SWELl- 051 (2VE-1B), SWELl-072 (2PT-1506-2).

SWELl-080 (2C187) SWELI-090 (2PIC-1506-2). SWELl-091 (2PS-1508)

Note: Mild Surface Corrosion on Cable Trays Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 158 of 251 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: Y[ NFI urI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 032 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2139 SWEL Components: SWELl -048 (2C-59). SWELl- 051 (2VE-1B), SWELI-072 (2PT-1506-2).

SWELl-080 (2C187) SWELI-090 (2PIC-1506-2). SWELl-091 (2PS-1508)

Note: Corrosion on 2FS-76 Note: VVU z7tj(4 scneauiearor/o/Tz

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 159 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YEI NE] Ur-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area' N/A SWEL Components: NONE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[-] N[:] U-- N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YEI NEI Uil N/AD1 significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YEI NEI U"- N/A[-

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 160 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y-' NE] U[-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area N/A

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YErI NEI U-I N/A[--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UiZ N/AD-'

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEl- NEI U-] N/All interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE- NEI UE- N/A[:]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Engineer*ing Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 161 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE] NE-] U[-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area N/A

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YD ND IIUý adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date:

Evaluated by: Date:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 162 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE- NE UE Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033_

Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A - Room, Area N/A SWEL Components: NONE Photographs Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 163 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE]- N[] UF]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area N/A SWEL Components: NONE Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 164 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NEI U0i Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 - Room, Area' 2091 SWEL Components: SWELl- 052 (2VUC-19A)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UE1 N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No potentialeffects from anchorage.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ N[-] UE7 N/AE-significant degraded conditions?

Conditionsappearfree of degradation.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ N[E] U[ N/A[]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

There is conduit nearby that will not be an adverse effect. There is a cable raceway underneath the component that does not pose any problems.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 165 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NRil UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 2091

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NOI UEI N/AEI1 spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No lighting or ceiling tiles above or adjacent to component.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEIl U[- N/A-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding issues or spray issues since the equipment is located in overhead of room.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN Nil U[-I N/A--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

There are no potentialadverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-- N/A[-]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There is temporary scaffolding with appropriatetags below item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 166 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NEI U -

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 2091

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NOi U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

There are no other adverse conditions present.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/2/2012 Eric Dalbone 10/2/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 167 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NF- U' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 2091 SWEL Components: SWELl- 052 (2VUC-19A)

Photographs Note: General Area Note: Overhead View

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 168 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UOI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 - Room, Area 2091 SWEL Components: SWEILl- 052 (2VUC-19A)

Note: GeneralArea Note: GeneralArea

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 169 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YN NI Ur-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 035 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area, 2009 SWEL Components: SWELl- 054 (2VUC-1F)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NIh U-- N/AZ-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All anchorageitems in the area of the equipment item appearto be in good conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UED N/A-'

significant degraded conditions?

No significantdegraded conditions found in or near the anchorage items in the area.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ Nin U- N/A-'

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting are free from any possible seismic hazards.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 170 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 035 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2009

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[E- U["] N/A[:]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Lighting equipment and other nearby items are free from spatial interactions.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ ND-1 U[D] N/ADI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

A present drain, eliminates any possible flooding hazards.,

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI UD' N/A[-]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No potentialfire hazards found in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[; NDI UD N/A[I interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Area is clean and well organized.No temporaryinstallationsfound that can present a seismic hazard.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 171 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 035 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2009

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NWI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other seismic conditions found that can affect the safety functions of the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area is well maintained.No possible hazards are found that can affect the area and the safety functions of the equipment item.

Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqanJr. Date: 9/29/2012 Michael E. Perez 9/29/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 172 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI uOL Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 035 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 - Room, Area 2009 SWEL Components: SWEILl- 054 (2VUC-1 F)

Photographs Note: Area is free from seismic hazards and Note: Anchorage in the area is free from good housekeeping is apparent. corrosion or degraded conditions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 173 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NF- UOF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 035 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2009 SWEL Components: SWELl- 054 (2VUC-1 F)

Note: Lighting equipment is well in place and Note: Due to the outage, this present hose is free from any adverse spatialinteractions. being fed into the drain.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 174 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ ND] UOF' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area' 2104 SWEL Components: SWELl- 056 (2D-24)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UD] N/AD-I potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in area is in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UD-N/AD--

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment is free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NDl UD- N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Tray and conduit are adequately supportedin room.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 175 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NF- UF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area2 2104

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U[-i N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There are no ceiling tiles in the room. There is I open s-hook in the room. CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 has been initiated.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U[- N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There is no flooding or spray source.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEr1 Ur- N/A-1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

There is no fire source.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZK NEI U-1 N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The fire extinguisheris secure. Their is a loose screw on security door 340. CR-ANO-2-2012-02666 has been initiated.

2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 176 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEi UD-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area3 2104

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] Uil adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other seismic conditions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 1013/12 Sean Smolarek 10/3/12 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 177 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[-] U[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area4 2104 SWEL Components: SWELl- 056 (2D-24)

Photographs Note: Component from SWELI-056 Note: General Overview 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 178 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE UOE Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Area5 2104 SWEL Components: SWELl- 056 (2D-24)

Note: Loose screws in security door.

Condition Report was initiated.

5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 179 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] UOIl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area' 2102 SWEL Components: SWELl- 057 (2D-12)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEIl UL-I N/Ar-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

There are robust supports in room. Anchorage of equipment in area is in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NiE UL-i N/AF-significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment is free of significantdegradedconditions, most supports in room are painted steel.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NI] U-- N/Aln raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Tray and conduit are adequately supported.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 180 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UDý Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. .372 Room, Area2 2102

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ N[l U[I N/AE]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There are no ceiling tiles in the room. Lighting supports are adequate.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEK N[i U[I'- N/A[-

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There is no flooding or spray source.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UIUI N/ADJ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

There is no fire source other than componet in room (batteries).

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UL] N/AF-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No portable equipment, no housekeeping issues in room.

2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 181 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area3 2102

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN ND' UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other seismic conditions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman -"Date: 10/3/2012 Sean Smolarek 10/3/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 182 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[:] UOJ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Area4 2102 SWEL Components: SWELl- 057 (2D-12)

Photographs Note: Component ID Note: Overheadlighting 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 183 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Area5 2102 SWEL Components: SWELl- 057 (2D-12)

Note: View of Anchorage Note:

5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 184 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N-- ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 - Room, Area' 2091 SWEL Components: SWELl- 058 (2Y-22)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y ] NEI U[- N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in area is in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ ND UI- N/AD significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment is free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UD- N/A--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Tray and conduit are adequately supportedin room.

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 185 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UE-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area2 2091

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[-E UI- N/A--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There are no ceiling tiles in the room. There is 1 open s-hook above 2Y22. CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 has been initiated

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI Uil N/AZ--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There is no flooding or spray source.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[:] N/AZ--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

There is no fire source.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UEZ N/AZ--

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The fire extinguisheris secure. Scaffold in areais secure and tagged properly.

2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 186 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area3 2091

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y; NE ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other seismic conditions were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Roy Berrymarn Date: 10/3/2012 Sean SmolareI*

• 10/3/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 187 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NEI U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area4 2091 SWEL Components: SWELl- 058 (2Y-22)

Photographs Note: Component from SWELl-058 Note: Overhead Lighting 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 188 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE] Unl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 - Room, Area5 2091 SWEL Components: SWELl- 058 (2Y-22)

Note: Underside Showing Anchorage Note:

5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 189 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ ND] UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 039 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area' 2094 SWEL Components: SWELl- 059(2F-210C). 060(2F-68B), 062(2M-202B), 094(2SY-2821).

095(2TC-8640-2). 099(2T-31 C)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NE-] UiE N/A[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No equipment anchorageissues present.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN ND UD N/AD--I significant degraded conditions?

No degradedconditions are present.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN ND UD N/AD-1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC overhead adequately supported for 2T-31C. Conduit raceway filled acceptablyfor all components. Other conduit is mounted sufficiently for all components.

1If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 190 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UO-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 039_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 - Room, Area 2094

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI] UJI N/AE-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No ceiling tiles in room. No lighting issues with 2T-31C. Multiple open S-hooks on lighting near 2M-202B and cabinet that 2SY-2821 are located inside of. Light resting against a pipe near 2TC-8640-2 and 2F-210C. CR-ANO-2-2012-02673 and CR-ANO-2-2012-02674 initiated.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-I N/AEI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding or spray issues for all components.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] U[: N/AE[-

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No fire issues near all equipment. Fuel oil day tank is in room and is anchored sufficiently.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N['- UE- N/A[E interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No housekeeping issues or temporary installationspresent.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 191 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 039 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 2094

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI N[Z UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

An unsecured ladderwas observed. CR-ANO-2-2012-02672 initiated.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman ..... Date: 10/2/2012 Eric Dilbone & 10/2/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 192 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NE- ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 039 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 2094 SWEL Components: SWELl- 059(2F-210C). 060(2F-68B). 062(2M-202B). 094(2SY-2821).

095(2TC-8640-2), 099(2T-31 C)

Photographs Note: General Area Note: Overhead lighting

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 193 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE N l UO" Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 039 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 2094 SWEL Components: SWELl - 059(2F-21 OC), 060(2F-68B), 062(2M-202B). 094(2SY-2821).

095(2TC-8640-2). 099(2T-31_C)

Note: Adjacent Ladder Note: Overhead Lighting

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 194 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] Uor]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 040 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 357 Room, Area' 165 SWEL Components: SWELl- 065 (2LT-1079-2)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE N[] U[] N/A-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NE-] UE] N/AE]

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage shows no signs of corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NEI UE3 N/AE]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

See Comments section below.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 195 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NII Ur--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 040 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 357 Room, Area 165

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE UI' N/A--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactioneffects.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[D NEI U[i N/A[-]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE UO N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE uLE-' N/A'-

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

See Comments section below.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 196 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 040 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 357 Room, Area 165

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Temporary seismic scaffolding and equipment is installed for use during Unit Refueling Outage.

Surface corrosion exists on overhead conduit/conduitsupport components. Corrosionappears to be surface only and has no adverse impact.

Evaluated by: Daniel Parker , - Date: 9/28/2012 Sean Smolarek 9/28/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 197 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NO U-IJ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 040_

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 357 - Room, Area 165 SWEL Components: SWEIL- 065 (2LT-1079-2)

Photographs Note: General Configuration Note: Observe mild surface corrosion on conduit support component

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 198 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NEII U-D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 040_

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 357 - Room, Area 165 SWEL Components: SWEIL- 065 (2LT-1079-2)

Note: Observe mild surface corrosion on Note:

conduit support component

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 199 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YN N["] Ut]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 041_

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 368 - Room, Area' 225 SWEL Components: SWELl- 066 (2LT-4627-1)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NE] U-1 N/A[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[K NtI Ut-] N/At]

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage shows no signs of corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NE] U[t] N/At_]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 200 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NF U-Il Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 041 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 368 - Room, Area 225

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEIl iJ N/AEl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI U-I N/A[']

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[l U[-I N/A--I interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U- N/A[-

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary installations were present due to 2R22.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 201 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ N['] U-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 041 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 225

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Miscellaneousitems were stored close to this area. These items are temporary and are removed at the conclusion of the refueling outage. This storage area is approximately 10 feet away from the nearestsafety related component.

A fire extinguisher (C02-465)is not anchored down. The fire extinguisherhas a small hole in the top which sits on a pin on the support. The pin appears to be short and the fire extinguisher could potentially come loose during a seismic event due to vertical movement. However, there are no credible Seismic Category I targets in the area.

Evaluated by: DanielParker Date: 9/28/2012 Sean Smolarek 9/28/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 202 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NF UW Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-041 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 368 - Room, Area 225 SWEL Components: SWELh- 066 (2LT-4627-1)

Photographs Note: General Configuration Note: General Configuration

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 203 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NFil U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 041 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 225 SWEL Components: SWELl- 066 (2LT-4627-1)

Note: Miscellaneous Equipment Storage Note: General Configuration

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 204 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UE]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 042 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area' 2150 SWEL Components: SWELl- 068 (2LY-1131-2A), 088 (2LY-5637-2), 092 (2PWR-1041-1), 093 (2PY-1 141-1 B)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YEI NO UE] N/AEI potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Component 2LY-1031-1B was found to be missing a bolt in the upper left comer in cabinet 2C15-1. It is well supported with two otherbolts, but one is missing completely (see photo below). Since this condition is in a cabinet, it would not affect other items in the room. CR-2-2012-02583 initiated

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI U[E N/AE]

significant degraded conditions?

No significantly degradedconditions were observed.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[K NEI UE] N/AE]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 205 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ Nil- U["]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 042 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 - Room, Area 2150

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[-1 url N/A"-

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions were observed.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UE- N/AI-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NF-: u[-] N/AF-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI uF"_ N/A-I interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No temporaryinstallationswere observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 206 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ N[:] U["-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 042 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 2150

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] U[i]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

An electricalbox in the direction opposite of the entrance to the room was found to have unsecuredlatches (see photo below). Craft was notified and door was shut.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqianJr. Date: 10/1/2012 Michael E. Perez 10/1/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 207 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N1 Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 042 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 2150 SWEL Components: SWELl- 068 (2LY-1131-2A). 088 (2LY-5637-2). 092 (2PWR-1041-1), 093 (2PY-1 141-1 B)

Photographs Note: In the bottom row and 3 rd column to the Note: Image shows the lighting system right shows the missing bolt on component hanging from the ceiling.

2LY-1031-1B.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 208 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ UI NE] U[

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 042 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 2150 SWEL Components: SWELl- 068 (2LY-1131-2A). 088 (2LY-5637-2). 092 (2PWR-1041-1). 093 (2PY-1 141-1 B)

Note: General image showing the end of the Note: Box that has latches opened.

room (opposite to the entrance).

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 209 of 251 Sheet I of 6 Status: YN NEI U[--1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 043 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 386 Room, Area' 170 SWEL Components: SWELl- 071 (2PT-1041-2)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[K NEi ulI N/A[!

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UE- N/A[!

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage shows no signs of corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN N[E Uil N/AZ!

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 210 of 251 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ No UW]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 043 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 170

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NiO UOi N/A[

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UW N/A-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No sources of flooding or spray were observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NOi U[- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NO U- N/A-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No temporaryinstallations were observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 211 of 251 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: Y[ NEI Ur-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 043 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 170

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Temporary lighting and power cords are installed due to the refueling outage. These components are temporary and would not damage any safety related components during a seismic event.

A permanent light is missing two bolts. Even though the remainingbolts appearto be sufficient, this light lacks the mass to damage any components in the area. There are no credible Seismic Category I targets in the area.

Evaluated by: DanielParker AL i, - Date: 9/28/2012 Sean Smolarek 9/28/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 212 of 251 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YZ NEI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 043_

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 386 - Room, Area 170 SWEL Components: SWELl - 071 (2PT-1 041-2)

Photographs Note: General Overview Note: General Overview - Observe temporary power cords and temporary lighting

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 213 of 251 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YN N1 UI--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 043_

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 386 - Room, Area 170 SWEL Components: SWELl- 071 (2PT-1041-2)

Note: General Overview - Observe temporary Note: Permanentlight missing 2 bolts power cords and temporary lighting

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 214 of 251 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YE NEI u[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 043_

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 386 - Room, Area 170 SWEL Components: SWEILl- 071 (2PT-1041-2)

Note: Permanentlight missing 2 bolts

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 215 of 251 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NF UW Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 044 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 386 Room, Area' 225 SWEL Components: SWELl- 073 (2PT-5601 -1)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NEI U[-] N/AF-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[K NF-I uF-] N/A["-]

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage shows no signs of corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NWJ U[W N/A[:"

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

1If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 216 of 251 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NEI- U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 044 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 225

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEIl U[ N/A-Z spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[E Nih ULIE N/A[-]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There are no sources of flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[i U-I N/A[Z]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[-' UEl N/A[--

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith the listed items, even though there were temporary installationsat the time of inspection. These items were partof 2R22, and would be removed during normal operation.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 217 of 251 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YV NF UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 044 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 225

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Fire extinguisher(C02-467)is not anchoreddown. The fire extinguisherhas a small hole in the top which sits on a pin on the support. The pin appears to be short and the fire extinguishercould potentially come loose during a seismic event due to verticalmovement. However, there are no safety related components that could be damaged if this were to occur.

Work is ongoing in the area due to a refueling outage. Power cords are present in the area. There are temporary installations,but would cause no damage to safety-related components in a seismic event.

Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 9/28/2012 Sean Smolarek 9/28/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 218 of 251 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NLI UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 044_

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 386 - Room, Area 225 SWEL Components: SWEILl- 073 (2PT-5601 -1)

Photographs Note: General Overview Note: General Overview - See power cords for work in progress.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 219 of 251 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YN NEI U[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 045 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area' 2118- Front SWEL Components: SWELl- 078(2C04), 079(2=16), 084(2L1-1079-2), 085(2L1-1179-1), 086(2LI-5637-2). 089(2P1-1041-1)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y] N[-] U[:] N/AFl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y; NEI UI- N/AEl significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NE U[E N/AEl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

The only thing visible from the ground was ceiling tiles, which all appearedto be a non-issue during a seismic event. Also, there are monitors that appearto be properly installed.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 220 of 251 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI U' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 045 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area2 2118 - Front

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE N[-] U[- N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

All lighting is recessed in the ceiling, and attachment cannot be seen without removing ceiling tiles. There is no reason to suspect that it is not properly anchored.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM N[D] uIl N/A[-1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[] N/A--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI UD- N/A[-]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Personal,Self-Contained BreathingApparatus air tanks were placed in a storage rack. During a large seismic event these tanks may bounce out of their racks and drop to the floor. This was judged to be a non-issue.

2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 221 of 251 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UD]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 045 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area3 2118- Front

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEi ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

There is no equipment or structures that would pose a significantrisk to criticalequipment due to spatialinteractionduring a seismic event.

All equipment and structures appearedto be properly anchored or supportedto mitigate any risk during a seismic event.

Evaluated by: DanielParker Date: 10/4/2012 Sean Smolarek 10/4/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 222 of 251 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NFJ U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 045 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area4 2118- Back SWEL Components: SWELl - 078(2C04). 079(2C1 6), 084(2L1-1 079-2), 085(2L1-1 179-1), 086(2LI-5637-2). 089(2P1-1041-1)

Photographs Note: Overhead drop ceiling with properly Note: Overhead drop ceiling with metal suspended display monitors diffuser panels. Edges properly seated in drop ceiling frame.

4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 223 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] UZr-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 046 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area' 2133 SWEL Components: SWELl- 082 (2C384), 087 (2LY-4627-2A)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NE: U[1 N/AF-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions were observed in equipment anchoragein the area.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y; N[-] UE-1 N/AE significant degraded conditions?

Anchor bolts in surroundingequipment were observed to be ok. No cracks in the concrete were found.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI uE N/AE[-

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC and pipe supports appeared to be adequateand in good condition. Cable trays were not overfilled and appearto be adequately supported.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 224 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ No UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 046 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2133

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI U[E N/AE:]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area appears to be free of potentiallyadverse spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[-- N/AEI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appears'to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI UEi N/AE-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-E NIAE]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There is a ladder in the area that is chained in a secure location and free from any potentiallyadverse seismic interactions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 225 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 046 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2133

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[: UE-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

All anchorage in the area appearssecure. No signs of degradationhave been observed. HVAC ducting, cables and conduits in the area are properlysecured. A drain is present in the area so as to mitigate the effects of flooding in the area.No issues regardinghousekeeping were found.

Evaluated by: Michael E. Perez Date: 10/10/2012 Sean Smolarek 5 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 226 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NIiI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 046_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 - Room, Area 2133 SWEL Components: SWEILl- 082 (2C384). 087 (2LY-4627-2A)

Photographs Note: Anchorage in the area is free from Note: HVAC ducting, cable trays, and adverse seismic conditions and signs of conduits appearto be properly secured in the degradation. area.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 227 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN NIZJ U-il Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 046_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 2133 SWEL Components: SWELl - 082 (2C384). 087 (2LY-4627-2A)

Note: Lighting in the area appearsto be Note:

properly secured and free for any potentially adverse spatialinteractionswith other nearby equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 228 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y ] NEI Ul-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 047 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area' 2154 SWEL Components: SWELl- 083(2C80)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NE] UWJ N/A[-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No anchorage issues identified.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NE'] uEr N/A[Z significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions identified.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ N[E UiE- N/A-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

There is tray in room, conduit supports and HVAC ducting that is all supported well.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 229 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ ND] UF-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 047 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area2 2154

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI U'- N/AD--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No tiles in room, lights are supportedwell.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI U[D1 N/AD1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding sources in room.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD1 N/AD--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No fire source in room.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[K NDI UD1 N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Cart and ladder are secured in room. Several broken zip ties hanging on trays. Fire extinguisher is not a seismic issue. It is secure horizontallyand bearson a hook, but it is not secure vertically. No other housekeeping issues identified.

2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 230 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 047 Location: RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area3 2154 Bldg.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Nothing else was identified.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/11/2012 Genaro BarraganJr. 10/11/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-C S- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 231 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 047 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area4 2154 SWEL Components: SWELl- 083 (2C80)

Photoaraohs Note: Front of Cabinet Note: Loose screw 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 232 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NEI Ui U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 047 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area5 2154 SWEL Components: SWELl- 083 (2C80)

Note: Ladder and Cart secure Note:

5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 233 of 251 Sheet I of 4 Status: Y; NEI UI1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 048 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area, 2007 SWEL Components: SWELl- 096 (2E-35B)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NE] UE[N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No potentiallyadverse seismic conditions were observed in equipment anchoragesin the area.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NE uEr N/AE significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions were observed in equipment anchoragesin the area.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ N[-] UE- N/A--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays appeared to have adequate fill conditions. No adverse seismic conditions were observed in pipe, HVAC and conduit supports.

1If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 234 of 251 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UOD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 048_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 - Room, Area 2007

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN ND U[I N/AD--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

A light fixture above has two supports with different properties,one is a chain with an open "S"hook and the other is a rigid conduit. In a seismic event the fixture could break away and impact equipment, but the heat exchanger is judged to be large enough to avoid damage from a light fixture.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YI N] u[] N/A[-D interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No potentialsources of flooding were observed. A floor drain was observed in the vicinity of the heat exchanger.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN ND UD N/AD]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No potentialfire sources were observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NDI UD:] N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There was scaffolding and permanent lead shielding aroundthe heat exchanger. These items do not result in any adverse seismic conditions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 235 of 251 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NEI Ur1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 048 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2007

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEil UI:]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cable trays appearedto be in good condition with no observed overfill conditions. Pipe supports appeared to be in good condition and propedly spaced. Miscellaneous steel supports and their anchoragesappeared to be in good condition.

Evaluated by: Daniel Andoh Date: 9/29/2012 Daniel Parker - -k - 9/29/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 236 of 251 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ Nf 1 UDý Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 048 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 2007 SWEL Components: SWEL- 096 (2E-35B)

PhotograDhs, Note: View of Light Overhead Note: View of Overhead

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 237 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 049 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. 329 Room, Area' 254 SWEL Components: SWELl- 100 (2T-57A)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UE- N/A[Z potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No potential adverse anchorage issues.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UEJ N/AE--

significant degraded conditions?

There is mild surface oxidation on tank anchorsand pumps in room.

This has no adverse seismic impact.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UE[ N/A[-]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

There is no tray in room, conduit supports and HVAC ducting are supported well.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 238 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y] Nr--] U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 049_

Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. 329 - Room, Area 254

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI ULi N/A[1 spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No tiles in room, lights are supported well.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI u[-1 N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No credible sources of flooding or spray were observed in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[:] N/A[-]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

There are no potential fire hazards identified.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[R NDl UD- N/A[D interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffolding in area is tagged properly. No other housekeeping issues identified.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 239 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ N[] UEO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 049 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 254

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI No UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Small rust lines on bottom of tank need to be evaluated. See SWC-100.

Reference CR-ANO-1-2012-2911.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Conditions in the area appeared to be free from adverse seismic conditions. There appearedto be some mild surface oxidation in the area,but this was ruled not to be adverse. Area appearedto be free from seismic conditions that could cause a fire or a flood. Housekeeping was proper and scaffolding was installed adequatelyand placed in the propercondition.

Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 1092012 Michael E. Perez 10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 240 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NEI UI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 049 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor Ei. 329 - Room, Area 254 SWEL Components: SWELl- 100 (2T-57A)

Photographs Note: Anchorage in the area appearsto be Note: Mild surface corrosion found on nearby properly secured. pumps, but has been ruled not to be an issue.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 241 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE-' Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 049 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. 329 Room, Area 254 SWEL Components: SWELl- 100 (2T-57A)

Note: HVAC ducting in the area appearedto Note: Scaffold in the area has been installed be in adequate conditions. properly. Permit tag has been identified, which shows that scaffolding placement is engineeringapproved. No adverse seismic conditions exist due to this scaffolding.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 242 of 251 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NF UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 050 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Areal 2040 SWEL Components: SWEL2-002 (2SW-57), SWEL2-004 (2SW-138)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UEi N/A[--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area are appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[R NEI U[i N/AE'-

significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the areaappears to be free of significant degraded conditons.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEJ U-E N/AE"1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All rigidelectricalconduit is adequately anchored to the overhead and the walls. Overhead piping and ducts appearto be properlysecured.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 243 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 050 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2040

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[E NEl UEi N/A[-]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overheadfluorescent lighting was secured with chain supports. There are no ceiling tiles in the room.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-I N/AI' interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray. Drainsin the floor provide a means to mitigate flooding in the event of a pipe break or release of water.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[K N[: UE3 N/A[:]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions that could cause a fire. Additionally, red fire piping and sprinklers are located in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEi UE! N/AE-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

At the time of inspection, bags with old piping insulation were stored outside of the designated storage area. The bags all contain temporary equipment tags indicatingremoval by 11/30/2012.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 244 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ N-I UD-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 050 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 2040

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] U"]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

An engineering-approvedscaffold was observed in the area, but does not present an adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek Date: 10/12/2012 Eric Dilbone 6 1 10/12/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 245 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 050_

Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 - Room, Area 2040 ,

SWEL Components: SWEL2-002 (2SW-57). SWEL2-004 (2SW-138)

Photographs SWEL components Designated storage area boundary Note: General view of the piping and Note: View of old pipe insulation. The bags components in the room. The SWEL were tagged for removal and therefore do not components inspected are seen at the top of present a seismic issue.

the picture.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 246 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U[-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 050 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354335 Room, Area 2040 SWEL Components: SWEL2-002 (2SW-57). SWEL2-004 (2SW-138)

Note: General view of area.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 247 of 251 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YE NEI-I U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 051 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 Room, Area' 2073 SWEL Components: SWEL2-001 (2SW-56). SWEL2-003 (2SW-62)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UE] N/A-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area are appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ N[ UZ-I N/AEZ significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degraded conditons. One pipe support in the area showed signs of surface oxidation. See picture on page 5.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U[- N/A--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All rigid electrical conduit is adequatelyanchored to the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 248 of 251 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ Nj j UM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 051 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 Room, Area 2073

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NO U-ij N/A' spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overhead fluorescent lighting was secured with chain supports. No open S hooks were observed. There are no ceiling tiles in the room.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NO U- N/A]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray. Drainsin the floor provide a means to mitigate flooding in the event of a pipe break or release of water.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NM U[-- N/A[

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions that could cause a fire. Additionally, red fire piping and sprinklers are located in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NO UE- N/A-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions with the items listed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-C S- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 249 of 251 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NE- UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 051 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 Room, Area 2073

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety funcitons of the equipment in the area were found.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek Date: 10/12/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/12/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 250 of 251 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[* N[-- UL-(AWC) AWC- 051 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 Room, Area 2073 SWEL Components: SWEL2-001 (2SW-56). SWEL2-003 (2SW-62)

Photographs Note: General view of the piping and Note: View of equipment in the overhead. An components in the room. embedded steel beam is used as an attachment point for large components.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 251 of 251 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE ND UIZ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 051 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 Room, Area 2073 SWEL Components: SWEL2-001 (2SW-56). SWEL2-003 (2SW-62)

Note: Pipe support showing signs of surface Note: View of anchorage and supports for oxidation. equipment in the area.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment E Rev. 0 Page 1 of 5 Attachment E Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment E Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5 Table 1 - Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions UormoIOn Untereu 1i1R.16 *cuoUII U-ýNu-4-Vu IZ-0o00 IHlUdLVu directly into CAP CR-C-2012-2829.

CR Action: Work Request Initiated to close S-Hooks Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that if the light were to fall, there would be no adverse impact to the operation of nearby safety-related equipment.

N/A SWELl-058 Open S-hooks on light above 2Y-22. Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-2894 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-2894 closed; directly into CAP WR-287463 will correct issue.

CR Action: Work Request Initiated to dose S-Hooks Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that if the light were to fall, there would be no adverse impact to the operation of nearby safety-related equipment.

N/A SWELl-059 Lighting is resting on pipe near 2T-31C. Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02674 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02674 closed to directly into CAP CR-C-2012-2829.

CR Action: Light Fixture should be moved Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that there is no adverse impact to the operation of nearby safety-related equipment.

N/A SWELl-062 Cracked washer observed on bottom Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02671 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02671 closed.

seat anchor of component 2M-202B. directly into CAP CR Action: Washer will not be replaced Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that the washer was not a cracked washer, but a lock washer.

N/A SWELl-09O No grout is installed under a base plate Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-C-2012-02804 initiated CR-ANO-C-2012-02804 closed to on the steel support. directly into CAP CR-2-2012-1756.

CR Action: Grout should be added under base plate Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that in during a seismic event, the anchor bolts would take any uplift (tension) and that the base plate would deflect no more than approximately 3/4" before it would impact concrete. This movement is within the limitations of the operation of the system and therefore there is no adverse seismic condition.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment E Rev. 0 Page 3 of 5 Table 1 - Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions LOI LAJIIIfJUIIUIIt t I-0 ifl, bujJJuiL LOt dHu*cll Initial Action: CR-ANO-C-2012-02980 initiated shown as 3"x3.5" on design drawing C-2260, Sheet 71. As built conditions are CR Action: Drawings should be revised measured to be 3.5"x4".

Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that the stated condition (tabs longer than design) does not impact the ability of these components to perform their safety-related functions. The longer tabs are more robust than design, and they provide more support. Drawing may be updated accordingly.

N/A SWELl-100 Tank support for 2T-57A shows signs of Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-C-2012-2911 initiated CR-ANO-C-2012-2911 closed.

significant corrosion on weld. directly into CAP CR Action: WO-331024 has been prepared to investigate the weld (NDE) and repaint to eliminate the oxidation.

Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that paint is missing, and consequently, there is mild corrosion. This does not impact the component and it is able to perform its specified safety function N/A AWC-003 A light fixture about 6ft away from 2SI- Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 dosed to 5091-3 has chain supports that snake directly into CAP CR-C-2012-2829.

around pipes and have open "S"hooks. CR Action: Work Request Initiated to close S-Hooks Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that if the light were to fall, there would be no adverse impact to the operation of nearby safety-related equipment.

N/A AWC-004 An open S-hook on a fluorescent light Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02664 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02664 closed to fixture was observed near 2VUC-2A. directly into CAP CR-C-2012-2829.

CR Action: Work Request initiated to close S-Hooks Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that if the light were to fall, there would be no adverse impact to the operation of nearby safety-related equipment.

N/A AWC-0O5 A light fixture was found to be resting Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02664 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02664 closed to against 2LS-8654-2A (ABHVAC 2VUC- directly into CAP CR-C-2012-2829.

2A). CR Action: Light fixture should be moved Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that the light fixture is light in mass and this condition does not adversely impact the components ability to perform their specified safety function.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment E Rev. 0 Page 4 of 5 Table 1 - Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions N/A AWC-005 An open s-hook was found above 2B-64 Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 dosed to (Motor Control Center) in RAB, El. 372, directly into CAP CR-C-2012-2829.

Room 2100.

CR Action: Work Request Initiated to close S-Hooks Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that if the light were to fall, there would be no adverse impact to the operation of nearby safety-related equipment.

N/A AWC-006 Open S-hook near component 2D-12 in Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 closed to Room 2097. directly into CAP CR-C-2012-2829.

CR Action: Work Request initiated to close S-Hooks Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that if the light were to fall, there would be no adverse impact to the operation of nearby safety-related equipment.

N/A AWC-032 Valve 2FS-76 is severely corroded. Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02582 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02582 closed.

Additionally, a Work Request was directly into CAP initiated, but the due date has passed. CR Action: Initial Work Request is scheduled to be completed WO-213734 will be used to correct the condition.

Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process. It was determined that this condition does not prevent the Fire Water System from performing its design function. Therefore, the system remains FUNCTIONAL. WR# 145813 and CR-ANO-2-2010-415, and CR-ANO-2-2011-3738 previously submitted.

N/A AWC-036 Open S-hook in Room 2104 near 2D-24. Condition entered Initial Action:.CR-ANO-2-2012-02683 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 closed to directly into CAP CR-C-2012-2829.

CR Action: Work Request initiated to close S-Hooks Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that if the light were to fall, there would be no adverse impact to the operation of nearby safety-related equipment.

N/A AWC-038 Open S-hook in Room 2091 near 2Y-22. Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02663 closed to directly into CAP CR-C-2012-2829.

CR Action: Work Request Initiated to dose S-Hooks Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that if the light were to fall, there would be no adverse impact to the operation of nearby safety-related equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment E Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5 Table 1 - Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02673 initiated 2M-202B and cabinet with component 2SY-2821. CR Action: Work Request Initiated to close S-Hooks Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that if the light were to fall, there would be no adverse impact to the operation of nearby safety-related equipment.

N/A AWC-039 Light stuck on pipe near 2TC-8640-2 and Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02674 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02674 closed to 2F-210C. directly into CAP CR-C-2012-2829.

CR Action: Light fixture should be moved Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that the light fixture is light in mass and this condition does not adversely impact the components ability to perform their specified safety function.

N/A AWC-039 Unsecured ladder observed in the Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02672 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02672 dosed; designated storage location in Room directly into CAP Ladders were secured.

2094, and a standing ladder was CR Action: Secured the ladders observed open in the comer.

Operability Review: Upon notification of the condition, the room ladder was secured by chain in the designated storage location inside the room and the standing ladder was removed from the #2 EDG Room and properly stored away.

N/A AWC-042 Component 2LY-1031-1B was found to Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-2-2012-02583 initiated CR-ANO-2-2012-02583 closed; be missing a bolt in the upper left corner directly into CAP Work Order completed and bolt in cabinet 2C15-1. CR Action: Work Order #328736 initiated to reinstall bolt has been reinstalled.

Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that the Signal Converter is not mounted per design, and its seismic qualification is unanalyzed in the current configuration 2LY-1031-1B is considered NON-FUNCTIONAL relative to the stated condition. Control Room Level Recorder 2LR-1031-1N is a Reg. Guide 1.97 instrument as identified in OP-2305.026 Supplement 1. It is however, not required to meet Remote Shutdown Instrumentation T.S, 3.3.3.5 and Post-accident Instrumentation T.S. 3.3.3.6.

Prepared by: Sean Smolarek Z"' Date: 11/15/2012 Reviewed by: Eric Dilbone Date: 11/15/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment F Rev. 0 Page 1 of I Attachment F Licensing Basis Evaluation Forms (NOT USED)

Engineerifig Report No.-CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment G Rev. 0 Page 1 of 3 Attachment G Peer Review Checklist for SWEL

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment G Rev. 0 Page 2 of 3 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL Instructions for Completing Checklist This peer review checklist may be used to document the review of the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) in accordance with Section 6: Peer Review. The space below each question in this checklist should be used to describe any findings identified during the peer review process and how the SWEL may have changed to address those findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Were the five safety functions adequately represented in the SWEL 1 selection? YZ N[-]

The SWEL 1 contains approximately 100 components and addresses all five safety functions. Many components provide safety functions for multiple systems, and/orare partof frontline support systems. All five safety functions discussed in EPRI Report 1025286 are well representedin the SWEL.

2. Does SWEL 1 include an appropriate representation of items having the following sample selection attributes:

a. Various types of systems? Y[9 N[i Items included on the SWEL comprise a variety of ESF systems such as Emergency Diesel Generatorsand Auxiliaries, Service Water System, Component Cooling Water System, Shutdown Cooling System, and vital electricalsystems.

b. Major new and replacement equipment? YI NZ Based on input from plant personnel and EC searches,equipment selection personnel identified no "major"changes to safety-relatedequipment and components made to the plant in the past 15 years.

c. Various types of equipment? Y NIEI SWEL 1 does not include components from Classes 12, 13 and 14 since they are not representedon Base List 1. Additionally, minimal Classes 3 and 9 items are representedon Base List I and are not reasonablyor safely accessible, so they were not included on SWEL 1.

d. Various environments? YZ NLi The SWEL contains components in mild, harsh, and outdoorenvironments. The components are located in different buildings, rooms, and/or on different builidng elevations.

e. Equipment enhanced based on the findings of the IPEEE (or equivalent) program? YZ NEI The SWEL includes components that were identified during the IPEEE as being potentially vulnerable to a seismic event. A sample of these components are included in the SWEL 1.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment G Rev. 0 Page 3 of 3 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL f Were risk insights considered in the development of SWEL I? YO NE SWEL 1 includes high risk components based on risk significance in the plant probabilisticrisk assessment (PRA) models.

3. For SWEL 2:

a. Were spent fuel pool related items considered, and if applicable included in YIE NO SWEL 2?

The walkdown team identified only a small population of SFPcomponents that are Seismic Category I. These components are included on SWEL 2.

b. Was an appropriate justification documented for spent fuel pool related items not YE NE1 included in SWEL 2?

There were no components that could contribute to rapid SFP draindown that were identified. There are no penetrations in the SFP wall below 10 ft above the top of the fuel assemblies, and all piping that communicate with the pool was installed along the refuel floor the top of the pool and then turns down into the pool with siphon breakers.

4. Provide any other comments related to the peer review of the SWELs.

The peer review team reviewed the initial SWEL I andSWEL 2, and provided comments and suggestions for modification of the SWEL. Comments included suggestions to remove equipment mounted to panels and cabinets because they are qualifiedas a whole (ie; handswtiches)%and to include the Decay Heat Exchangers.

The peer reviewers ensuredthe SWELs met the requirements of EPRI Report 1025286.

Required changes to the SWEL necessary during the walkdown due to inaccessibilitywere reviewed by the peer reviewers to verify that the changes did not impact the level of compliance to the EPRI report.

5. Have all peer review comments been adequately addressed in the final SWEL? Y29 NEI Peer Reviewer #l: Frank Cobb Date: 10/222012 Peer Reviewer #2: Date, 10/29/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 1 of 6 Attachment H Peer Review Comment Form

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 2 of 6 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report SEntergy Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Rev. 0 Title Report Number ANO-2 Seismic Walkdown Report - SWCs and AWCs Quality Related: L] Yes Z No Special Notes or Instructions:

Comment Section/Page No. Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials General, Several of the SWCs reviewed note mild surface Explicit statements included for these BDK/PAM SWC+AWC oxidation or other minor condition observations where situations. CRs generated are noted on the question has been marked "Y". In these situations, the SWCs and AWCs, regardless of the SWC should also include an explicit judgment from whether it represents a seismic condition the SWEs stating that the observation is not a seismic or not.

concern. Where these seismically unrelated observations require correction, it would be useful to also include the CR number generated even if not reported as a seismic concern in the NTTF 2.3: Seismic program.

General, Where potential conditions are identified, it would be CRs and WRs written have been BDK/PAM SWC+AWC highly beneficial to include CR numbers generated (as included in all SWCs and AWCs.

available). This assists with cross-referencing.

General, Anytime "N/A" is marked, a brief explanation/justification All N/A items now have an explanation of BDK/PAM SWC+AWC should be provided. (For line-mounted items with why it has been marked that way.

common justification for anchorage questions, can be provided once on SWC). This includes anchorage, flexibility of lines, etc.

General, Generally, consistency between the justification text, The checklists have been cleaned up BDK/PAM SWC+AWC question responses, and CRs initiated should be from hand-written notes, and the final improved. copies have improved consistency.

General, Additional detail regarding observed block walls should Identified block walls are seismically BDK/PAM SWC+AWC be included on the checklists to confirm they were designed, and are noted on the considered appropriately, checklists where relevant.

General, The initial sample of checklists reviewed has not Seismic interaction concerns such as the BDK/PAM SWC+AWC identified potentially adverse seismic conditions related examples described in the EPRI to interaction. Please confirm that seismic interaction Guidance and in EPRI SWE training

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 3 of 6 concerns are considered during walkdowns and area were being considered during.

walk-bys. walkdowns and area walk-bys. Peer review confirmed this during observation walkdowns. Expanded sample of checklists included examples where seismic interaction concerns were noted, where appropriate.

General, For items requiring anchorage configuration verification, All walkdowns where an anchorage BDK/PAM SWC it is useful to note the document #s used for comparison configuration verification check is with the configuration observed in the field. performed now includes basis document numbers.

General, Please confirm that all cabinet/panel doors were opened Confirmed. Additional clarification is now BDK/PAM SWC (i.e., MCC cubicles). If not, the SWC should include included on SWC forms where useful.

justification for how the goals of the inspection are still being met without opening the cabinet (see supplemental NRC FAQ dated 9-18-12), or should be marked as incomplete pending deferral to when the cabinets will be able to be opened (i.e., outage).

General, Additional clarification is recommended to explain what General description of how non- BDK/PAM SWC the anchorage question responses mean for in-line anchored components were treated is components that have no formal anchorage. included in the body of the report.

General, It would be useful to indicate the equipment class Equipment class names are on each BDK/PAM SWC name/description on the SWCs, not just the number. SWC.

General, Several SWEL items appear to be described using Corrections made to SWCs, Base List 1, BDK/PAM SWC incorrect/inappropriate equipment class designations. and SWEL 1. Each SWC includes the Please revisit the classes assigned and correct where proper equipment class.

necessary.

General, Several of the AWCs reviewed were somewhat unclear Where an area considered was less than BDK/PAM AWC about what "Area" around the SWEL item(s) is the entire room, a brief description has considered. Recall that an acceptable "Area" is an been included on the AWC.

approximate 35' radius from the SWEL item. Consider including a more general photo of the area and/or include brief statement of area considered (i.e., if entire room looked at, say so).

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 4 of 6 General, Include a photo on the AWC of each seismic condition Photos are included wherever conditions BDK/PAM AWC identified during that area walk-by. were identified, as well as a general photo of the area in most cases.

General, Need to discuss why the block wall will remain stable Additional information is provided on BDK/PAM SWC+AWC during a seismic event block walls. Note that ANO has painted all of their seismically qualified block walls with a blue stripe.

General, List the anchorage dwgs in the SWC if a configuration Drawings/calculations/plant BDK/PAM SWC verification is performed documentation is now referenced in all SWCs where an anchorage configuration verification is performed.

General, Must justify that minor corrosion/surface oxidation does Added a statement justifying any noted BDK/PAM SWC+AWC not adversely impact seismic qualification, mild corrosion or surface oxidation.

Reviewed By: Paul A. Miktus Date 10/11/12 Site/Department: ENERCON/PM Ph. 770-792-6972 Reviewed By: Benjamin D. Kosbab Date 10/11/12 Resolved By: Sean Smolarek Site/Department: ENERCON/Civil Ph. 770-590-2179 Date: 10/25/2012 I

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 5 of 6 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Rev. 0

Title:

ANO-2 Fukushima Seismic SWEL Review Report Number I Quality Related: E] Yes Z No Special Notes or Instructions:

Comment Section/Page Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number No. SWELl COMMENTS Accept Initials 1 SWELl Remove Hand Switches from SWEL as the mounting will Removed Hand Switches FC likely not be visible (even with the cabinet opened) and the switches will be evaluated with the panel as a whole 2 SWELl Ensure any items identified to be inaccessible on A preliminary walkdown was performed FC/JK preliminary walkdowns are swapped out with equivalent to identify any inaccessible items or items (class, environment, etc) components. These items were swapped out by Equipment Selection Personnel and sent back to the SWEL peer reviewer for concurrence.

3 SWELl Verify each class of component is adequately represented. SWEL 1 does not include components FC/JK It appears a few do not show up in the SWEL. from Classes 12, 13 and 14 since they are not represented on Base List 1.

Additionally, minimal Classes 3 and 9 items are represented on Base List 1 and are not reasonably or safely accessible, so they were not included on SWEL 1.

4 SWELl Are there any major new or replacement components Plant personnel as well as the electronic FC included? database were consulted to find new and replacement items. Many items were identified on the SWEL to be new or have been replaced since the IPEEE report.

However, the Guidance defines the new and replacement classification as "major',

of which none of the components fit.

5 SWELl Suggest expanding representation of equipment class 21 The Decay Heat Exchanger has been FC I with some of the major heat removal equipment. added to the SWEL.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 6 of 6 SWEL 2 COMMENTS 6 SWEL2 Verify Safety Classification of SFP Cooling System Per the Upper Level Document on the FC Spent Fuel Pool, The SFP Cooling System is Non-Safety and Non-Seismic.

Safety-related service water components associated with SFP cooling are included on SWEL 2.

Reviewed By: John Kinney/Frank Cobb Date 10/24/12 Resolved By: Sean Smolarek Site/Department: OPS/Mech Date: 10/24/12

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment I Rev. 0 Page I of 19 Attachment I Seismic Walkdown Engineering Training Certificates

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment I Rev. 0 Page 2 of 19 Seismic Walkdown Engineers Sean Smolarek Eric Dilbone Daniel Andoh Roy Berryman Genaro Barragan Michael Perez Daniel Parker Chris Johnson Ojaswi Shrestha

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001

. ..-  :. . Attachment

-- I V.Rev. 0

~Page-3,of 19 L-'j,~

d .L* E... IN Certificate of Compltin is hereby granted to Sean Smolarek for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 23 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS August 22, 2012- Kennesaw, GA "

Date - Location Kursat Kinali, Ph.D., P.E.

EPRI Certified Seismic.Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, .VA - 7/27/2012- -. .

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment I Rev. 0 Page 4 of 19 ExclNcEy'. 0 r dN Excellence--Every project.Every.doy.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Eric Dilbone for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA 4Kevin Bessell Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001

- ~~~*T~eof1.9 r Rev. 0 Excellence-Every project.Every doy.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Daniel Andoh for successful completion of.,

TRAININGION NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS.

August 22, 2012- Kennesaw, GA Date - Location Kursat Kinali, Ph.D., P.E.

EPRI Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA m'7/27/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-,CS-12-00001 Attachment I Rv..-R 0

w Page'6 of 19 Excellence--Every project Every d.y.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to for successful completion of T TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE *":*

RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded- 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA Kevin Bessell KennethW i.hitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer PaloAlto, CA - 6/13/2012 Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012

• id

• ':l '!"=,,l

?""1?:i~ :::ii! i1,i: *I!"L P:d *P .';!; :*i :: ii:i*'~"'*1J'2I!0

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment I Rev. 0 7of 19 StructuralIntegrity Associates, inc.9 Certificateof Completion

ýENARO B"ARRAkGAN Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns 9- 13 -/?

Date Has ey

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment I

ý1-1 'A Page 4 f19

.~ ~j~j*~

Certificateof Completion Michael Perez Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 27, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment I P v.e Page *Ibf 19 C-I=I2I RESA ,H ,fýt-,-~

Certificateof Completion Dan Parker Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 27, 2012 /f.) -a4w3aýý Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attac,hmen: I Re 0 Pane 10 o L9

~EI~I I ELECTRIC POWER RES5EARCH INSTITUTE Certificate of Completion Chris Johnson Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns June 13, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment I j.ev. 0 Pane I of 19 ELECTRIC POWER REEAR., INSTITUTE Certificateof Completion Ojaswi Shrestha Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 11, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment I Rev. 0 Page 12 of 19 Seismic Walkdown Peer Reviewers Paul Miktus Ben Kosbab

ANOI Rpjo

$9 ttf c ti

~~ uf Aicmw

~1 1 is is tu ditfi - a ii, ill

'/1 X~1

\ ~A ampl_ til-eb -t'4ý -qwv l nt,I IV P, (E f 'i, 1, (.6.111"..,

III

'~2~g(

Neilf-P.

~

i$'mith, Commoinweaith Edison I/V F p DaPvid A reed MP ssociates R6obert P. Kassawara, EPRI SQUG Training Cordin.6 or SQU.G Pro)g r am Ma'ha g er.

nn rin Re oNo. CAL -ANO2-CS-12-00001

~EPRI

.Electric Power Research Institute cci tilndc ,Uýi uf Airitf mcu

'Q105%iz to (9A

'Paul IA*-

§ei'sm ir ,3 0 K 4 4 QliUrsce J-9 a.

VI David A. Freed, MPR Associates .Robert P. Kassawara, EPRI SQUG Training Coordinator SQUG Program Manager

• Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment I Rev. 0

. , Page 15 of 19 Excellence.-Every Po 6.c Every doy Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Benjamin Kosbab for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA K yin Bessell Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment I Rev. 0 Page 16 of 19 EPRI-Qualified SWE Trainers Kevin Bessell Kursat Kinali Ken Whitmore

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS-12-00001 Attachment I IIm19 S19 Page 17 ELECTRICPOWER

• .I RESEARCH INSTITUTE Certificateof Completion Kevin Bessell Training on. Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns June 13, 2012 /f.00.4,4ýý Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 Attachment I

v. 0 Page 18 of19

~R SA*ZCH *N5lT(

ft!

Certificate of Completion Kursat Kinali Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 27, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO2-CS- 12-00001 A f Ir Itev. u Page iof 19 Certificate of Completion Kenneth Whitmore Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

'I

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns St.

I',

III I!;

ii' June 21, 2012 if, j0p.44444a.ý iii Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Strctural Reliability & Integrity II:

Ii'