|
---|
Category:Letter type:
MONTHYEAR0CAN102401, Response to Request for Additional Information - Arkansas Nuclear One – Units 1 and 2, Proposed Alternatives ANO1-ISI-24-01 and ANO2-ISI-24-01 for Examinations of Steam Generator Pressure-Retaining Welds and Full Penetration Welded Nozzle2024-10-16016 October 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information - Arkansas Nuclear One – Units 1 and 2, Proposed Alternatives ANO1-ISI-24-01 and ANO2-ISI-24-01 for Examinations of Steam Generator Pressure-Retaining Welds and Full Penetration Welded Nozzles 2CAN102401, Cycle 31 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)2024-10-14014 October 2024 Cycle 31 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) 1CAN082401, Inservice Inspection Summary Report for the Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 Thirty-First Refueling Outage (1R312024-08-13013 August 2024 Inservice Inspection Summary Report for the Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 Thirty-First Refueling Outage (1R31 2CAN072401, Proposed Alternative for Implementation of Extended Reactor Vessel In-Service Inspection Interval (ANO2-ISI-24-02)2024-07-19019 July 2024 Proposed Alternative for Implementation of Extended Reactor Vessel In-Service Inspection Interval (ANO2-ISI-24-02) 0CAN072401, Annual 10 CFR 50.46 Report for Calendar Year 2023 Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Changes2024-07-0808 July 2024 Annual 10 CFR 50.46 Report for Calendar Year 2023 Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Changes 1CAN072401, Request for Review and Approval of Changes to the Safety Analysis Report and to a Confirmatory Order Clarifying an Alternate Means of Compliance for Pressurizer Heaters Emergency Power Supply2024-07-0202 July 2024 Request for Review and Approval of Changes to the Safety Analysis Report and to a Confirmatory Order Clarifying an Alternate Means of Compliance for Pressurizer Heaters Emergency Power Supply 0CAN062403, Groundwater Protection Initiative - Voluntary Special Report for Tritium Levels2024-06-25025 June 2024 Groundwater Protection Initiative - Voluntary Special Report for Tritium Levels 0CAN062402, Proposed Alternatives ANO1-ISI-24-01 and ANO2-ISI-24-01 for Examinations of Steam Generator Pressure-Retaining Welds and Full Penetration Welded Nozzles2024-06-0606 June 2024 Proposed Alternatives ANO1-ISI-24-01 and ANO2-ISI-24-01 for Examinations of Steam Generator Pressure-Retaining Welds and Full Penetration Welded Nozzles 0CAN052401, – Units 1 and 2, Submittal of Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 20232024-05-13013 May 2024 – Units 1 and 2, Submittal of Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2023 1CAN052401, Cycle 32 Core Operating Limits Report2024-05-0404 May 2024 Cycle 32 Core Operating Limits Report 2CAN042403, Response to the Request for Additional Information Regarding ANO-2 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk-Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended C2024-04-24024 April 2024 Response to the Request for Additional Information Regarding ANO-2 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk-Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended C 0CAN042402, Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Report for 20232024-04-23023 April 2024 Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Report for 2023 0CAN042401, Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the 2023 Calendar Year2024-04-15015 April 2024 Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the 2023 Calendar Year 2CAN042402, Special Report of Non-functional Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor2024-04-11011 April 2024 Special Report of Non-functional Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor 2CAN042401, Request to Revise Typographical Errors in Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 Technical Specifications2024-04-0404 April 2024 Request to Revise Typographical Errors in Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 Technical Specifications 2CAN012401, U.S. Additional Protocol2024-01-17017 January 2024 U.S. Additional Protocol 2CAN012403, Supplemental Information - Adopt Risk-Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 42024-01-11011 January 2024 Supplemental Information - Adopt Risk-Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4 0CAN012401, Registration of Cask Use2024-01-10010 January 2024 Registration of Cask Use 1CAN122301, Responses to Request for Additional Information for Request for Alternative for Implementation of Extended Reactor Vessel Inservice Inspection Interval (ANO1-ISl-037)2023-12-14014 December 2023 Responses to Request for Additional Information for Request for Alternative for Implementation of Extended Reactor Vessel Inservice Inspection Interval (ANO1-ISl-037) 0CAN102303, Registration of Cask Use2023-10-24024 October 2023 Registration of Cask Use 0CAN102301, Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) Study2023-10-0404 October 2023 Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) Study 1CAN092301, Supplemental Information - Adopt Risk-Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 42023-09-21021 September 2023 Supplemental Information - Adopt Risk-Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4 0CAN092302, Supplement to Request for Alternative Frequency to Containment Unbonded Post-Tensioning System Inservice Inspection (ANO-CISI-002)2023-09-14014 September 2023 Supplement to Request for Alternative Frequency to Containment Unbonded Post-Tensioning System Inservice Inspection (ANO-CISI-002) 2CAN092301, Reply to a Notice of Violation2023-09-0808 September 2023 Reply to a Notice of Violation 0CAN092301, Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revision2023-09-0505 September 2023 Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revision 0CAN082301, Units 1 and 2 - Changes to the Quality Assurance Program Approval Form for Radioactive Material Package No. 03412023-08-17017 August 2023 Units 1 and 2 - Changes to the Quality Assurance Program Approval Form for Radioactive Material Package No. 0341 2CAN082301, Inservice Inspection Summary Report for the Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2, Twenty-Ninth Refueling Outage (2R29)2023-08-10010 August 2023 Inservice Inspection Summary Report for the Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2, Twenty-Ninth Refueling Outage (2R29) 0CAN072301, Registration of Cask Use2023-07-18018 July 2023 Registration of Cask Use 1CAN062304, Supplement Related to License Amendment Request to Remove Technical Specification Condition Allowing Two Reactor Coolant Pump Operation2023-06-29029 June 2023 Supplement Related to License Amendment Request to Remove Technical Specification Condition Allowing Two Reactor Coolant Pump Operation 0CAN062301, Status of Actions to Return to Compliance2023-06-26026 June 2023 Status of Actions to Return to Compliance 0CAN062302, Submittal of Revision 22 of the ANO Fire Hazards Analysis2023-06-20020 June 2023 Submittal of Revision 22 of the ANO Fire Hazards Analysis 1CAN062301, Request for Alternative for Implementation of Extended Reactor Vessel Inservice Inspection Interval (ANO1-ISI-037)2023-06-0808 June 2023 Request for Alternative for Implementation of Extended Reactor Vessel Inservice Inspection Interval (ANO1-ISI-037) 0CAN052303, Annual 10 CFR 50.46 Report for Calendar Year 20222023-05-24024 May 2023 Annual 10 CFR 50.46 Report for Calendar Year 2022 0CAN052302, Emergency Plan Rev. 482023-05-11011 May 2023 Emergency Plan Rev. 48 0CAN052301, Units 1 and 2 - Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 20222023-05-0909 May 2023 Units 1 and 2 - Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2022 2CAN052301, Cycle 30 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)2023-05-0303 May 2023 Cycle 30 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) 0CAN042302, Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Report for 20222023-04-27027 April 2023 Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Report for 2022 0CAN042301, Radioactive Effluent Release Report for 20222023-04-14014 April 2023 Radioactive Effluent Release Report for 2022 2CAN042301, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk-Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 42023-04-0505 April 2023 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk-Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4 1CAN032301, License Amendment Request to Modify the Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1, Technical Specification 3.3.1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Turbine Trip Function on Low Control Oil Pressure2023-03-30030 March 2023 License Amendment Request to Modify the Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1, Technical Specification 3.3.1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Turbine Trip Function on Low Control Oil Pressure 2CAN032303, Responses to Request for Additional Information Concerning the Request for Alternative Regarding the Half-Nozzle Repair of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Penetration 462023-03-29029 March 2023 Responses to Request for Additional Information Concerning the Request for Alternative Regarding the Half-Nozzle Repair of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Penetration 46 2CAN032304, Supplement to the Request for Alternative Regarding the Half-Nozzle Repair of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Penetration 462023-03-29029 March 2023 Supplement to the Request for Alternative Regarding the Half-Nozzle Repair of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Penetration 46 2CAN032305, 03 Post Examination Analysis2023-03-23023 March 2023 03 Post Examination Analysis 1CAN032302, Inspection Summary Report for the Thirtieth Refueling Outage (1R30)2023-03-20020 March 2023 Inspection Summary Report for the Thirtieth Refueling Outage (1R30) 1CAN012301, Responses to Request for Additional Information for Request for Relief ANO1-ISI-0352023-01-30030 January 2023 Responses to Request for Additional Information for Request for Relief ANO1-ISI-035 2CAN012303, U.S. Additional Protocol2023-01-23023 January 2023 U.S. Additional Protocol 1CAN122201, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk-Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 42022-12-22022 December 2022 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk-Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4 0CAN122202, Registration of Cask Use2022-12-21021 December 2022 Registration of Cask Use 0CAN122201, Reply to a Notice of Violation; EA-22-0992022-12-0808 December 2022 Reply to a Notice of Violation; EA-22-099 0CAN112201, Request for Alternative Frequency to Containment Unbonded Post-Tensioning System Inservice Inspection (ANO-CISI-002)2022-11-10010 November 2022 Request for Alternative Frequency to Containment Unbonded Post-Tensioning System Inservice Inspection (ANO-CISI-002) 2024-08-13
[Table view] Category:Report
MONTHYEAR2CAN112403, Affidavit for Corrosion Evaluation of ANO-2 RVCH CEDM Idtb Weld Nozzle Penetration Repair, Document Number 51-9384397-0012024-10-31031 October 2024 Affidavit for Corrosion Evaluation of ANO-2 RVCH CEDM Idtb Weld Nozzle Penetration Repair, Document Number 51-9384397-001 ML24295A1232024-10-21021 October 2024 Enclosure 3: Relief Request ANO2-RR-24-001, Revision 0 (Non-Proprietary) 1CAN072401, Request for Review and Approval of Changes to the Safety Analysis Report and to a Confirmatory Order Clarifying an Alternate Means of Compliance for Pressurizer Heaters Emergency Power Supply2024-07-0202 July 2024 Request for Review and Approval of Changes to the Safety Analysis Report and to a Confirmatory Order Clarifying an Alternate Means of Compliance for Pressurizer Heaters Emergency Power Supply 1CAN062304, Supplement Related to License Amendment Request to Remove Technical Specification Condition Allowing Two Reactor Coolant Pump Operation2023-06-29029 June 2023 Supplement Related to License Amendment Request to Remove Technical Specification Condition Allowing Two Reactor Coolant Pump Operation 1CAN062302, Enclosure 2: ANO-1 SAR Amendment 31 - Redacted Version2023-06-20020 June 2023 Enclosure 2: ANO-1 SAR Amendment 31 - Redacted Version ML23180A1082023-06-20020 June 2023 ANO Unit 1 SAR Amendment 31, TRM, TS Bases, 10 CFR 50.59 Report, and Commitment Change Summary Report ML23088A2172022-12-31031 December 2022 Relief Request for Half-Nozzle Repair of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Penetration 46 - Technical Report, ANP-4023NP, Revision 0, December 2022 2CAN022202, Requests for Relief from American Society of Mechanical Engineers Section XI Volumetric Examination Requirements - Fourth 10-Year Interval, Second and Third Periods2022-02-24024 February 2022 Requests for Relief from American Society of Mechanical Engineers Section XI Volumetric Examination Requirements - Fourth 10-Year Interval, Second and Third Periods CNRO-2021-00023, Entergy Operations, Inc. - Supplement to CNRO-2021-00002, Basis for Concluding the Terms of Confirmatory Order EA-17-132/EA-17-153 Are Complete, Element L2021-10-0606 October 2021 Entergy Operations, Inc. - Supplement to CNRO-2021-00002, Basis for Concluding the Terms of Confirmatory Order EA-17-132/EA-17-153 Are Complete, Element L 0CAN102102, Units 1 and 210 CFR 50.71(e) Report Revision 20 of the ANO Fire Hazards Analysis2021-10-0606 October 2021 Units 1 and 210 CFR 50.71(e) Report Revision 20 of the ANO Fire Hazards Analysis ML21272A3032021-09-30030 September 2021 Technology Inclusive Content of Application Project (Ticap) for Non-Light Water Reactors Westinghouse Evinci; Micro-Reactor Tabletop Exercise Report ML21237A0512021-08-25025 August 2021 Follow-on Risk Informed Performance Based Implementation Guidance Needed for Advanced Non-Light Water Reactors ML21081A1922021-06-30030 June 2021 Enclosure - USNRC-CNSC Joint Report Concerning X-Energys Reactor Pressure Vessel Construction Code Assessment 2CAN062103, Request for Alternative ANO2-PT-003 End-of-Interval System Leakage Test for Extended Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping - Fifth Interval2021-06-29029 June 2021 Request for Alternative ANO2-PT-003 End-of-Interval System Leakage Test for Extended Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping - Fifth Interval 0CAN052102, Annual 10 CFR 50.46 Report for Calendar Year 2020 Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Changes2021-05-10010 May 2021 Annual 10 CFR 50.46 Report for Calendar Year 2020 Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Changes ML21272A3382021-04-0101 April 2021 Technology Inclusive Content of Application Project (Ticap) for Non-Light Water Reactors Versatile Test Reactor Ticap Tabletop Exercise Report ML21090A0332021-03-31031 March 2021 Historical Context and Perspective on Allowable Stresses and Design Parameters in ASME Section III, Division 5, Subsection Hb, Subpart B (ANL/AMD-21/1) ML21083A1362021-03-23023 March 2021 Completed Activities ML21083A1372021-03-22022 March 2021 NEIMA Reporting ML21083A1382021-03-22022 March 2021 Rulemaking ML21083A1392021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 1 ML21083A1402021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 2 ML21083A1412021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 3 ML21083A1422021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 4 ML21083A1432021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 5 ML21083A1442021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 6 ML21014A2672021-01-14014 January 2021 Preapplication Engagement to Optimize Application Reviews January 12 Version - Copy 1CAN032001, Supplemental Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Loss of Voltage Relay Allowable Values2020-03-19019 March 2020 Supplemental Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Loss of Voltage Relay Allowable Values 0CAN121901, Summary of Lost Specimens Investigation Report2019-12-0303 December 2019 Summary of Lost Specimens Investigation Report ML18215A1782018-06-30030 June 2018 WCAP-18169-NP, Rev 1, Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 2 Heatup and Cooldown Limit Curves for Normal Operation. ML17214A0292018-02-12012 February 2018 Staff Assessment of Flooding Focused Evaluation (CAC Nos. MF9809 and MF9810) ML17291A0092017-10-26026 October 2017 Staff Assessment Regarding Program Plan for Aging Management for Reactor Vessel Internals (CAC No. MF8155; EPID L-2016-LRO-0001) ML17236A1792017-08-22022 August 2017 Arkansas, Units 1 and 2, ANO Emergency Plan On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report, Revision 2 0CAN081703, Document 51-9257562-001, Revision 1, Arkansas Nuclear One Hfe - High Frequency Confirmation Report2017-08-16016 August 2017 Document 51-9257562-001, Revision 1, Arkansas Nuclear One Hfe - High Frequency Confirmation Report ML17167A0832017-06-28028 June 2017 Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 - Review of Commitment Submittal for License Renewal Regarding Nickel-Based Alloy Aging Management Program Plan (CAC No. MF8154) 0CAN061701, Transmittal of 10 CFR 50.71(e) Report, Revision 17 of the ANO Fire Hazards Analysis2017-06-0707 June 2017 Transmittal of 10 CFR 50.71(e) Report, Revision 17 of the ANO Fire Hazards Analysis 0CAN051704, Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOC-CS-14-00017, Rev 0, 2017 Focused Evaluation for External Flooding at Arkansas Nuclear One.2017-03-13013 March 2017 Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOC-CS-14-00017, Rev 0, 2017 Focused Evaluation for External Flooding at Arkansas Nuclear One. 2CAN011703, Submittal of Additional Protocol Report2017-01-26026 January 2017 Submittal of Additional Protocol Report ML17024A0362016-12-31031 December 2016 Operating Data Report for 2016 0CAN121602, Mitigating Strategies Assessment (MSA) Report for the New Seismic Hazard Information Per Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 12-06, Appendix H, Revision 2, H.4.3 Path 32016-12-30030 December 2016 Mitigating Strategies Assessment (MSA) Report for the New Seismic Hazard Information Per Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 12-06, Appendix H, Revision 2, H.4.3 Path 3 ML17003A2902016-12-20020 December 2016 Areva, Inc. - Engineering Information Record - Arkansas Nuclear One HFE-High Frequency Confirmation Report ML16365A0272016-10-31031 October 2016 ANP-3486NP, Revision 0, MRP-227-A Applicant/Licensee Action Item 6 Analysis for Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 1 (ANO-1). ML16293A5842016-09-30030 September 2016 WCAP-18166-NP, Revision 0, Analysis of Capsule 284 from the Entergy Operations, Inc. Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program. 1CAN091601, Submittal of Initial Examination Completion of Post-Examination Analysis2016-09-0101 September 2016 Submittal of Initial Examination Completion of Post-Examination Analysis ML16202A1672016-07-0505 July 2016 Report 1500227.401, PWR Internals Aging Management Program Plan. ML16147A3242016-05-31031 May 2016 ANP-3417NP, Rev. 1, MRP-227-A Applicant/Licensee Action Item #7 Analysis for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1. ML16004A1792015-12-31031 December 2015 Attachment 2, ANP-3418NP, Revision 0, Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Internals License Renewal Scope and MRP-189, Revision 1 Comparison (MRP-227-A Action Item 2) Licensing Report. (Non-Proprietary) ML15278A0242015-09-28028 September 2015 Attachment 2, Areva Document ANP-3417NP, Revision 0, MRP-227-A Applicant / Licensee Action Item No. 7 Analysis for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 (Non-Proprietary), Attachment 3, Affidavit, and Attachment 4, List of Commitments ML15099A1522015-04-16016 April 2015 Review of Spring 2014 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report, Inspection During Refueling Outage 2R23 ML15071A0552015-03-31031 March 2015 ANP-3300Q2NP, Revision 0, Response to Request for Additional Information on Reactor Coolant System Pressure/Temperature and Low Temperature Overpressure Protection System Limits to 54 EFPY for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1. 2024-07-02
[Table view] Category:Miscellaneous
MONTHYEARCNRO-2021-00023, Entergy Operations, Inc. - Supplement to CNRO-2021-00002, Basis for Concluding the Terms of Confirmatory Order EA-17-132/EA-17-153 Are Complete, Element L2021-10-0606 October 2021 Entergy Operations, Inc. - Supplement to CNRO-2021-00002, Basis for Concluding the Terms of Confirmatory Order EA-17-132/EA-17-153 Are Complete, Element L 0CAN052102, Annual 10 CFR 50.46 Report for Calendar Year 2020 Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Changes2021-05-10010 May 2021 Annual 10 CFR 50.46 Report for Calendar Year 2020 Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Changes ML21083A1362021-03-23023 March 2021 Completed Activities ML21083A1432021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 5 ML21083A1412021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 3 ML21083A1372021-03-22022 March 2021 NEIMA Reporting ML21083A1382021-03-22022 March 2021 Rulemaking ML21083A1392021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 1 ML21083A1402021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 2 ML21083A1422021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 4 ML21083A1442021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 6 ML21014A2672021-01-14014 January 2021 Preapplication Engagement to Optimize Application Reviews January 12 Version - Copy 1CAN032001, Supplemental Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Loss of Voltage Relay Allowable Values2020-03-19019 March 2020 Supplemental Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Loss of Voltage Relay Allowable Values 0CAN121901, Summary of Lost Specimens Investigation Report2019-12-0303 December 2019 Summary of Lost Specimens Investigation Report ML17214A0292018-02-12012 February 2018 Staff Assessment of Flooding Focused Evaluation (CAC Nos. MF9809 and MF9810) ML17291A0092017-10-26026 October 2017 Staff Assessment Regarding Program Plan for Aging Management for Reactor Vessel Internals (CAC No. MF8155; EPID L-2016-LRO-0001) ML17167A0832017-06-28028 June 2017 Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 - Review of Commitment Submittal for License Renewal Regarding Nickel-Based Alloy Aging Management Program Plan (CAC No. MF8154) 2CAN011703, Submittal of Additional Protocol Report2017-01-26026 January 2017 Submittal of Additional Protocol Report ML17024A0362016-12-31031 December 2016 Operating Data Report for 2016 0CAN121602, Mitigating Strategies Assessment (MSA) Report for the New Seismic Hazard Information Per Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 12-06, Appendix H, Revision 2, H.4.3 Path 32016-12-30030 December 2016 Mitigating Strategies Assessment (MSA) Report for the New Seismic Hazard Information Per Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 12-06, Appendix H, Revision 2, H.4.3 Path 3 ML17003A2902016-12-20020 December 2016 Areva, Inc. - Engineering Information Record - Arkansas Nuclear One HFE-High Frequency Confirmation Report 1CAN091601, Submittal of Initial Examination Completion of Post-Examination Analysis2016-09-0101 September 2016 Submittal of Initial Examination Completion of Post-Examination Analysis ML16147A3242016-05-31031 May 2016 ANP-3417NP, Rev. 1, MRP-227-A Applicant/Licensee Action Item #7 Analysis for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1. ML15099A1522015-04-16016 April 2015 Review of Spring 2014 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report, Inspection During Refueling Outage 2R23 ML15086A0242015-03-25025 March 2015 ANP-3300Q3NP, Revision 0 to Response to Request for Additional Information on Reactor Coolant System Pressure/Temperature and Low Temperature Overpressure Protection System Limits to 54 EFPY for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 (Non-Proprietary ML15043A1032015-02-10010 February 2015 Areva Document ANP-3383NP, Response to Request for Additional Information for the Reactor Pressure Vessel Internals Aging Management Program Plan for Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 1 0CAN021501, Spent Fuel Storage Radioactive Effluent Release Report for 20142015-02-0303 February 2015 Spent Fuel Storage Radioactive Effluent Release Report for 2014 ML15028A4932015-01-31031 January 2015 ANP-3281Q1NP, Rev. 0, Response to NRC Request for Additional Information on Time-Limited Aging Analysis for the ANO-1 Reactor Vessel Internals, Attacment 2 ML14329A4262014-10-22022 October 2014 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Record of Review, Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 2 (ANO-2), LAR Attachment V-Table V-1 Fire PRA Facts and Observations (F&Os). ML14223A8032014-08-12012 August 2014 Review of Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report for Refueling Outage 1R24 0CAN031404, ANO, Units 1 & 2 - Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force (Nttf)Review of Insights from the Fukushima2014-03-28028 March 2014 ANO, Units 1 & 2 - Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force (Nttf)Review of Insights from the Fukushima Da ML14051A1882014-03-18018 March 2014 Staff Assessments of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident (TAC MF0090-MF0091) 0CAN021403, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.59 Summary Report and Commitment Change Summary Report2014-02-11011 February 2014 Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.59 Summary Report and Commitment Change Summary Report ML14028A1992014-01-16016 January 2014 Units 1 and 2, Unsatisfactory Blind Quality Assurance Drug Testing Samples 2CAN091302, Updated Seismic Walkdown Report2013-09-30030 September 2013 Updated Seismic Walkdown Report 1CAN031305, Cycle 24 COLR, Revision 62013-03-13013 March 2013 Cycle 24 COLR, Revision 6 ML12159A5972012-06-18018 June 2012 Closeout of NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies 0CAN021204, Units 1 and 2, Third Five-Year Surveillance of the First Ventilated Storage Cask2012-02-29029 February 2012 Units 1 and 2, Third Five-Year Surveillance of the First Ventilated Storage Cask 2CAN011202, Additional Protocol Report2012-01-31031 January 2012 Additional Protocol Report ML1130703872011-11-0202 November 2011 Fall 2011 RFO - Steam Generator Inspection Call - Part II, Summary of the ANO1 1R23 Steam Generator Inspection 2CAN091103, CFR 50.59 Summary Report2011-09-16016 September 2011 CFR 50.59 Summary Report 1CAN041105, Request for Use of Non-ASME Code Repair to Service Water Piping in Accordance with Generic Letter 90-05 Relief Request ANO1-R&R-0162011-04-20020 April 2011 Request for Use of Non-ASME Code Repair to Service Water Piping in Accordance with Generic Letter 90-05 Relief Request ANO1-R&R-016 0CAN101003, 10 CFR 50.59 Summary Report and Commitment Change Summary Report2010-10-0707 October 2010 10 CFR 50.59 Summary Report and Commitment Change Summary Report 1CAN091001, 10 CFR 50.46 Report - Significant Change in Peak Cladding Temperature2010-09-0808 September 2010 10 CFR 50.46 Report - Significant Change in Peak Cladding Temperature 0CAN031001, Units 1 & 2, Unsatisfactory Laboratory Testing Report2010-03-18018 March 2010 Units 1 & 2, Unsatisfactory Laboratory Testing Report 2CAN011003, Submittal of Us Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security. Additional Protocol Report2010-01-28028 January 2010 Submittal of Us Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security. Additional Protocol Report 0CAN100901, Units 1 & 2, Unsatisfactory Laboratory Testing Report2009-10-13013 October 2009 Units 1 & 2, Unsatisfactory Laboratory Testing Report 0CAN050903, Annual 10 CFR 50.46 Report for Calendar Year 2008 Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Changes2009-05-15015 May 2009 Annual 10 CFR 50.46 Report for Calendar Year 2008 Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Changes 2CAN100802, CFR 50.59 Summary Report for Period Ending October 6, 20082008-10-13013 October 2008 CFR 50.59 Summary Report for Period Ending October 6, 2008 2CAN070804, Cycle 20 Startup Report2008-07-0303 July 2008 Cycle 20 Startup Report 2021-05-10
[Table view] |
Text
.)riteigy Entergy Operations. Inc.
RuselkilIeAR 2802 Tel 479 88 826 Timothy L. Arnold Manager. Framing Arkansas Nuclear One ICANO916OI September 5. 2016 Mr. Thomas Farina Chief Examiner U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.
Arlington, TX 7601 1-4125
Subject:
Initial Examination Completion of Post-Examination Analysis Arkansas Nuclear One Unit I (B&W)
Docket No. 50-313 Dear Mr. Farina.
Contained in this submittal are the post examination materials as required per NUREG 1021, Revision 10 for the ANO Unit One initial license examination administered during the week of August 22. 2016 and the written exam administered on September 1. 2016. The examination security agreement which is enclosed has not been finalized and the completed form will be sent when all required signatures are obtained.
We also request that all examination materials related to the ANO Unit One 2016 NRC Operator License Examinations be withheld from public disclosure for a period of two years from this date.
If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Randal Martin at (479) 858-6844.
Sincerely, Tim Arnold Manager, Training Arkansas Nuclear One Attachment cc w/o attachment: Licensing, ANO-DCC
2016 ANO-1 NRC Exam Administered September 1, 2016 Page 1 of 7 RO Final Written Examination Analysis The threshold for determination of questions to be analyzed was a percentage of 50% incorrect responses. We also analyzed other questions based on candidate feedback following the examination.
- 1 7/17 total candidates incorrect (41.1%)
All seven chose C. The correct answer is A.
This question involves a steam space leak and asks which of the choices given, and reason for that choice, will be used to control RCS pressure in accordance with RT-14. The correct answer A was to cycle the ERV to prevent challenges to the safeties. Candidate feedback during the exam de-brief on Friday, September 2, revealed that the reason the seven candidates chose C was based on the wording of the question. The question asks .which of the following methods... will be used... (italics and bold emphasis added for this report), The candidates missing this question reasoned this wording implied what will be used to control RCS pressure considering a given stable RCS temperature of 560 °F and a rapidly rising RCS pressure of 1350 psig. The candidates reasoned that subcooling margin (SCM) would thus be restored quickly since the RCS pressure and temperature given was just below the SCM line on Figure 1 of 1202.013 in their handout (please refer to the attached figure).
We maintain the correct answer A is still correct considering the parameters as a snapshot in time. We are therefore requesting a change to the key to allow both A and C to be correct. This is in accordance with NUREG-1021, ES-403, D.1 .c. We will, of course, revise this question to ensure it is suitable for future use. We will also be performing training needs analysis on this question.
111202.013 I EOP FIGURES REV 4 PAGE 1 of 6 zi A FIGURE 1 Saturation and Adequate SCM 2500 2000 C
a)
E a)
I C
1500 0)
C C
1 a) 1000 U)
U) a)
a-Cl)
C) 500 0
200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 5501 650 700 t
RCS Temperature (10°F Incrennts)
RCS Pressure Adequate SCM
>1000 psig 30°F 350 to 1000 psig 50°F
<350 psig 70°F
2016 ANO-1 NRC Exam Administered September 1, 2016 Page 2of7 (RD Final Written Examination Analysis continued)
- 19 6/17 total candidates incorrect (35.2%)
One chose A, and five chose D. The correct answer is C.
This question involves a dropped rod event which causes a plant runback to 40% of 902 MWe (the runback final power was not given). The parameters given show reactor power and turbine load at 30%, the student was asked which action was procedurally required. The correct answer C is to take manual control of the SGIRX master, an ICS station which will stop the runback when taken to manual. Candidate feedback during the exam de-brief on Friday, September 2, revealed that the reason the five candidates chose D (trip the reactor) was due to recent OE at Grand Gulf where the operating crew continued to operate the plant during a severe transient instead of tripping the unit. This OE was used by ANDs acting Site Vice President during recent meetings with plant staff where he reinforced the conservative position to trip the unit when plant control is not present. This action is procedurally supported by the entry conditions of 1202.001, Reactor Trip, where it is stated that a manual trip is required due to . . . a system degradation that requires a manual reactor trip based on operator judgement. Please refer to the attached page of 1202.001.
We are therefore requesting a change to the key to allow both C and D to be correct. This is in accordance with NUREG-1021, ES-403, D.1.c. Although ES 403, D.1.c gives an example where the question would be deleted we ascertain question 19 is different from the example since answer C does not overtly state a manual trip is not required. We will, of course, revise this question to ensure it is suitable for future use. We will also be performing training needs analysis on this question.
CHANGE 1202.001 REACTOR TRIP 037 PAGE 1 of 30 ENTRY CONDITIONS An automatic reactor trip or DSS trip.
Failure of RPS to trip the reactor upon reaching a limit listed below:
- High power 104.9%
- High power/pumps one pump per loop 55%
OR 0 pumps in one loop 0%
- High power/imbalance/flow COLR Figure
- High RCS temp 618°F(T-hot)
- High RCS press 2355 psig
- Low RCS press 1800 psig
- Variable low RCS press COLR Figure
- High RB press 18.7 psia
- Turbine trip reactor power 43% AND Turbine is tripped
- Both MFW pumps trip reactor power 9% AND both MFW pumps tripped
- Manual trip of the reactor is required due to reaching a hmit listed b&ow:
- PZR level dropping < 100, AND no indication of recovery
- PZR level > 290
- Any MSIV closure at power
- Either SG level < 15 or> 95%,
AND no indication of recovery A system degradation that requires manual reactor trip based on operator judgment
- Abnormal Operating Procedure requirement
- IF a system degradation occurs while shutdown, above DHR operation, THEN perform applicable steps
2016 ANO-1 NRC Exam Administered September 1, 2016 Page 3 of 7 (RO Final Written Examination Analysis continued)
- 27 9/17 total candidates incorrect (52.9%)
Seven chose A, and two chose B. The correct answer is C.
This question involves essential Technical Specification knowledge:
Shutdown Margin (SDM) is listed in the initial conditions as being less than 1 .0%
delta k/k. This is a 15 minute LCO action which is required to be committed to memory. No change to the key was made. The question is technically correct as written, with no construction problems. We will be performing training needs analysis on this question.
- 44 9/17 total candidates incorrect (52.9%)
Two chose A, one chose B, and six chose C. . The correct answer is This question gives the conditions of a tube rupture, states an emergency cooldown is not required, asks what is the maximum cooldown rate, and what that rate is based on. The cooldown rate is limited by Tech Spec 3.4.3 to 100
°F/hr and the reason is to prevent cooldown induced stresses from causing a brittle fracture of the reactor vessel. The majority of examinees missing this question chose C which has the correct cooldown rate but has the bases for the Framatome cooldown rate guidance in 1102.010 for a normal (non-emergency) cooldown. No change to the key was made. The question is technically correct as written, with no construction problems. We will be performing training needs analysis on this question.
2016 ANO-1 NRC Exam Administered September 1, 2016 Page 4 of 7 (RO Final Written Examination Analysis continued)
- 59 17/17 total candidates incorrect (100.0%)
Twelve chose A, and five chose C. The correct answer is B.
This question is about an Inadequate Core Cooling (ICC) scenario testing the applicants knowledge of Core Exit Thermocouples (CET5) during a core damaging event as well as actions to take when CET indications exceed specific thresholds on Figure 4 of 1202.013. The correct answer B states, CETs are failing due to short circuits, trip all running RCPs. Choice A contains the correct action (trip all RCPs due to entering Region IV in an ICC event) and the reason CETs are experiencing thermionic emission. Thermionic emission was chosen as a distracter since the ANO-1 system training manual on incore Self Powered Neutron Detectors (SPNDs) stated thermionic emission affected SPNDs but did not state this affected CETs (both are contained within the same insulating material).
Following exam administration, a discussion with an instructor who is also an Electrical Engineer revealed that thermionic emission will have an effect on thermocouples similar to that of a short. Thermocouples operate on the Seebeck effect. Two dissimilar metals (in this case chromel and alumel), one with a greater affinity for electrons result in a small voltage being generated where the wires are joined (junction). As temperature increases the average energy of the electrons increase resulting in a greater migration to the wire with the greater affinity. This results in a larger voltage at the junction. As the temperature further increases, the electron energies approach the work function energy of the conductor. Thermionic emission occurs when the electrons have sufficient energy to breach the work function and leave the conduction surface. This free movement of electrons neutralizes the potential previously generated at the thermocouple junction resulting in no or little voltage. This lowering of voltage at the hot junction will be indicated as a rapid lowering of the measured temperatures.
We maintain the correct answer B is still correct since melting of the CETs will still cause a short and a short will cause a CET to fail low. We are therefore requesting a change to the key to allow both A and B to be correct.
This is in accordance with NUREG-1021, ES-403, D.1.c. We will, of course, revise this question to ensure it is suitable for future use. We will also be performing training needs analysis on this question.
2016 ANO-1 NRC Exam Administered September 1, 2016 Page 5 of 7 SRO Final Written Examination Analysis The threshold for determination of questions to be analyzed was a percentage of 50% incorrect responses.
- 76 5/8 total candidates missed (62.5%)
One chose A and four chose D. The correct answer is B.
This question is challenging. The question concerns a small break LOCA with a loss of subcooling margin (SCM). The question states the break has been isolated and gives conditions for SCM has been restored. The examinee must realize that the Reactor Trip LOP must be transitioned to in order to re-evaluate plant conditions to ensure no other events are in progress. This question is valid as written. No change to the key was made. The question is technically correct as written, with no construction problems. We will be performing training needs analysis on this question.
- 84 4/8 total candidates missed (50.0%)
All four chose A. The correct answer is D.
This question tests the ability of the examinees to use the Technical Requirements Manual when given indications of a failed smoke detector. The successful examinees realized the smoke detector string would be non-functional and the suppression system which uses the smoke detector string as an initiator for automatic operation would also be non-functional. This question is valid as written. No change to the key was made. The question is technically correct as written, with no construction problems. We will be performing training needs analysis on this question.
2016 ANO-1 NRC Exam Administered September 1, 2016 Page 6 of 7 (SRO Final Written Examination Analysis continued)
- 90 4/8 total candidates missed (50.0%)
All four chose D. The correct answer is B.
This question is based on actions in 1203.037 for abnormal ES bus voltage which is low but not low enough to automatically start the EDG5. The key to this question is the last condition given: no grid disturbances are occurring. If there are no grid disturbances, then the EDG can be started, paralleled with the grid, and then the ES bus separated from the grid with its load on the EDG. The incorrect choice D has the EDG started, the ES bus feeder breaker opened, and then the EDGs output breaker closes to pick up the de-energized bus. This would be the correct action IF the grid was unstable. This question is valid as written. No change to the key was made. The question is technically correct as written, with no construction problems. We will be performing training needs analysis on this question.
- 98 4/8 total candidates missed (50.0%)
One chose C, three chose D. The correct answer is B.
This question involves a Site Area Emergency where an Emergency Medical Team must be dispatched to a high dose rate area to rescue a critically injured employee. The question asks what the maximum stay time is for the team members and who can authorize them to extend this time if they volunteer. The emergency dose limits are 10 Rem to save vital equipment and 25 Rem to save a life and the person who can authorize an extension is the Shift Manager. This question is valid as written. No change to the key was made. The question is technically correct as written, with no construction problems. We will be performing training needs analysis on this question.
- 99 4/8 total candidates missed (50.0%)
Two chose A, two chose B. The correct answer is D.
This question requires the examinee to recall that an exclusion area evacuation is required for a General Emergency. This question is valid as written. No change to the key was made. The question is technically correct as written, with no construction problems. We will be performing training needs analysis on this question.
2016 ANO-1 NRC Exam Administered September 1, 2016 Page 7 of 7 Applicant Examination Review The applicant examination review produced several comments which are included in the preceding analysis for questions 1, 19, and 59.
Farina, Thomas From: MARTIN, RANDAL K <------------------>
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 3:52 PM To: Farina, Thomas Cc: POSSAGE, ROBERT G
Subject:
[External_Sender] Fwd: Information Request Attachments: ASLP-RO-MCD04.pdf; ATT00001.htm TJ, See info below.
Randal Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message:
From: "POSSAGE, ROBERT G" <--------------------------->
Date: September 7, 2016 at 4:49:16 PM EDT Cc: "MARTIN, RANDAL K" <----------------------------->
Subject:
RE: Information Request
- 1. CETs are used for calculating SCM.
- 2. The display on C19 (ICCMDS) gets its temperature from the CETs. The ATOG screen that is often up tracks Th and Tc to look for heat transfer upsets and it is plotted against a saturation curve and an adequate SCM curve. The Plant Data Server (PDS) and SPDS have the ATOG screens but there is no direct readout of SCM on the ATOG screen. There is also a ANO 1 SPDS Safety Function Display that uses CETs to calculate SCM. TI1150A/B on C04 indicates SCM directly and uses CETs for an input. The Plant Computer is located to the right of the Turbine controls.
- 3. I cant find a value. Everything I find gives an indicating band like you stated 50 - 2300 F.
- 4. See attached file From: Farina, Thomas [-----------------------------------------]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 2:14 PM To: POSSAGE, ROBERT G; CORK, JOHN W; MARTIN, RANDAL K Cc: Clayton, Kelly
Subject:
Information Request EXTERNAL SENDER. DO NOT click links if sender is unknown. DO NOT provide your user ID or password.
ANO, Please provide the following additional information to facilitate review of your post-exam comments.
1
- 1. For 1202.013 Figure 1, Saturation and Adequate SCM, what measure of RCS temperature is an operator required to use to determine SCM: CET temp, Tave, Thot, or something else?
- 2. Similarly, on the large LCD display mounted in the overhead to the left of the CRS desk in the control room, SCM is displayed from the plant computer. What measure of RCS temperature does this parameter use to calculate SCM?
And so that I have all my questions in one place, per previous emails please provide the following:
- 3. Per design, at what temperature are ANO1s CETs expected to start failing?
- 4. Please provide the initial license training material that describes CET failure mechanism and behavior in accident conditions.
- Thanks,
-TJ Thomas Farina Sr. Operations Engineer USNRC Region IV Division of Reactor Safety, Operations Branch 2
Farina, Thomas From: MARTIN, RANDAL K <------------------------->
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 6:50 AM Farina, To: Thomas Cc: POSSAGE, ROBERT G
Subject:
[External_Sender] RE: Exam Security Agreement TJ, Another aspect of the question #59 that came to mind during this review is the level of knowledge on the thermocouple failure and to what level of detail the operators should know from memory. When the operators were asked about this during the post exam debrief, they recalled the impact of thermionic emission within the incore instrument string which contains the CET thermocouple. Based on that information and the discussion with John Cork who remembers struggling how to meet both parts of the KA statement, that I believe introduced a level of difficulty into #59 that is possibly beyond what is necessary for the licensed operator to recall from memory. The proposal to accept the two answers (A and B) that contain the correct response to part B of the KA is what we are presenting as the more essential piece of the question and that the question does test the level of knowledge for the operator in the control room.
Thank you for the consideration of the three questions we have proposed for changes and let me know if you or the review team needs any additional information.
Randal ES-401 page 6 of 50
- 2. Select and Develop Questions
- a. Prepare the site-specific written operator licensing examination using a combination of existing, modified, and new questions that match the specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline (refer to Section D.1 and ES-201) and the criteria summarized below. Ensure that the questions selected for Tier 3 maintain their focus on plant-wide generic knowledge and abilities and do not become an extension of Tier 2, Plant Systems.
When selecting or writing questions for K/As that test coupled knowledge or abilities (e.g., the A.2 K/A statements in Tiers 1 and 2 and a number of generic K/A statements, such as 2.4.1, in Tier 3), try to test both aspects of the K/A statement.
If that is not possible without expending an inordinate amount of resources, limit the scope of the question to that aspect of the K/A statement requiring the highest cognitive level (e.g., the (b) portion of the A.2 K/A statements) or substitute another randomly selected K/A.
Any time it becomes necessary to deviate from the previously approved examination outline, discuss the proposed deviations with the NRCs chief examiner and obtain concurrence. Also explain on Form ES-401-4 why the original proposal could not be implemented and why the proposed replacement is considered an acceptable substitute.
ES-401-9
- 4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
- Job Link: The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content).
- Minutia: The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
From: Farina, Thomas [-------------------------------]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 4:57 PM To: POSSAGE, ROBERT G Cc: MARTIN, RANDAL K
Subject:
RE: Exam Security Agreement 1