ML13003A030

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:27, 21 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Peach Bottom, Unit 2, Report No. MPR-3815, Rev. 3, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page C-250 Through Page C-333
ML13003A030
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/16/2012
From: Schlaseman C S
MPR Associates
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Exelon Generation Co
References
RS-12-173 MPR-3815, Rev 3
Download: ML13003A030 (84)
v • d • e


Text

Sheet 1 of 2 Statusl N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E-R-8123B Equip. Class1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Torus Water Level/Temperature Recorder Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T2-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YD NJK Y70N0 UD' N/AD YM NEI UEI N/AU Y NEI UEO N/AU YO- NE UED N/As YNEI UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<'C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrfmnnnr1.nrup Nn " R.-19-17.A C-250 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. t*-8123B Equip. Class" (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Torus Water Level/Temperature Recorder Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YTN[3 UE- N/AlD YP NEI UEI N/AD Y& NEI U"' N/ADI: SNEI UEl Other Adversei Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YCN[ UEO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments ,(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: /0q/10 ýq/V/;<C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrPnnnrI~nrA.

Nnn

  • RR-19-171 C-251

= w* 0 m-o CD-I.

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: & N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LS2-23-91B Equip. Class'2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Suppression Pool Level Switch Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room' Area R2-1o Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO A(YN-NEI U" N/AD YN[ NE U' N/AE[YX$NO UE N/AE" YE[ NE U] N/AX YX'/N[ UE 12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 ,nrrPýnnr1Pnnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-17A C-253 Sheet 2 of 2 tquipment il No. L6iL-LJ-'tS'1 hquip. Class- (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Suppression Pool Level Switch Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y?$4E UE- N/AD XNI'- UEJ N/AD YXND UD N/AD YdND UEJ Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y;K NDl UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by: Date: Q /--?J- 9(7z17z Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn

  • RR-19-17.A C-254

-.0 z 0 z W 04 3 m to m 3-D C4-.u co w Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LT-8123% A Equip. Class' (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Torus Water Level Transmitter for A .-,Knix Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 RoomArea R2-X 10 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI ýY)R(NE]UO N/ADI YVN"] UEI N/AE YA'NE- UD N/Af'Y-I NEI UE1 N/AVj YXNEI UIJ]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrP.-nnndPnr'.P Nn " Rq-1 9-17.C-256 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment Description Torus Water Level Transmitter for LR-8123ý A j (4 TliWOd Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No OT Y) NO UD N/At 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y( NO Ut- N/At]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Xk*NQ Ut] N/At.Y)('Nt U[]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y* Nt] Ut adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

MAf Evaluated by: ly Date:

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrm~nnnrIdnrP Nn

  • MR-19-17.1 C-257

!-~ 0 , g ~.C, (.)~ -u ci,-J i~*A 0 C Ni Sheet I of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. M02-06-02AB Equip. Class 1 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description Feedwater Stop Valve-S" frlot F Location:

Bldg. Drnvell Floor El. 154 Room, Area D/W2-N , 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO N YXNI- Ui N/AQl Y:dNEI UE- N/AEJ Y* NEl UE1 N/AEJ YEI Nil Uf- N/Al(YX NEI UIJ 2Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrP.nnnr1dnr.P Nn " RR-19-173 C-259 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. M02-06-029\ Equip. Class 1 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description Feedwater StoR Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free frori impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Afo s VL .4~YO/ND UQ' N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, )?NEI U0'Q N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?-Teo~roY C06ock5 d4 4 n4V@J QU*ke & CdDAt 44Y W1-wO*J occep 4 oble 9. Do attached lines have adequate' flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y<NE U[ N/ADE YX NO U[Q Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX'ND U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: OPMAir I " VI#Date: i I Vi Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn

  • RR-19-173 0-260 0 3D~ C, m 30 CD 0 0 N, (0 co Sheet I of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. M02-10-013'k t) Equip. Class" 2 (08aj Motor Operated Valves.kj~l~Ut.J A~.LjJ1tl LLA' A4f~d'LIQ ,MVA. 2 V&LI& 51 4)0 1 t O Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R2- i 7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the.SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage freS of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?, VmIC-rnvtjiu
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NX Yj<NI- UEI N/AU YXNEI UL- N/AU Y< NEI U] N/AD YE! NEI UI] N/AX YX NEI UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrmnnndrnrP.

Nn , P.R-1 9-17.1 C-262 4Y -Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. M02-10-0131B Equip. Class" (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR Pump N7l'orus Suction ztPO3 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

-.Ala 4 o:6 YXND uri NAD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y 'NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

X 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y'Nj"I ULI N/A[NE UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions.

that could V'NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary).

A//A Evaluated by: Evaluated by: Date: Dae Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-263 S-.0* 0 D O:0 01~3>)m 3 0 C)6 Sheet I of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. M02-10-015B Equip. Class 1 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves kIC 101V3 1[.Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 116 Room, Area R2-18 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraue 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y] NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing r loose hardware?

Y)ý NE] UE! NIAE]*line #Ko4~dlý ke )#4 ,~ v/' iude re 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Ytg NE] UE] N/A[]4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YJq NEI Vie JU 0 CAMJ M', OLUJT6b ,.Tzu.CbTI.A, ETCrL UE- N/AE].5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NEI UE] N/A, YV' NEI UE]12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn" RS-19-173 C-265 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. M02-10-015B Equip. Class 1 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR Pump B Shutdown Cooling Suction (2WZP035)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets fre ct by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

do otPr4(r6COJr

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y)NEI UI-1 N/AEl Y}( NO' UIJ N/AO-Y NE UE N/AO Y}X NEI. ur Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y)N-1ULI-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages, may be added as necessary).NIA\Evaluated by:~aUir Date: ga/3~342~2LZ< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 CrnrrP.mnnndrPnr.P Nn " R.-19-173 C-266

-0)0 0 3w-~0 0 I m 3 CD V 0 N)0 0L 01l co

-00 0 3w-~0* 0 m 3o CD 0 C-T'co Sheet 1 of 2 Status: & N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)---uipment Oper......

Equip. Valves Equipment Description RHR Shutdown Cooling Suction Inboard Isolation Valve Location:

Bldg. Drvwell Floor El. 134 Room, Area D/W2-17 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora~e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?.L; ne -mour YO N)Y .Q U-I N/AO 3.Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YP NEI UI N/AL 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
  • ~ NEI UF N/AL YO] ND UL N/At Y)( NEI UL 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3

  • n RR-19-17.1 C-269 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. M02-10-018 Equip. Class" 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR Shutdown Cooling Suction Inboard Isolation Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y; NO U0- N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NEI Ut] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? N[] UF N/ADl 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YX NEI Ut'of potentially adverse seismic interaction effectsb.Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NO Ui]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: C)I Date: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrmnnndInr.A Nn" R.R-19-17.1 C-270 D -gCD.~ ?~g.~-~ 0~z ~* 0 g* 0 C,)~ -u CD cn 0 C N, m-0 C CD 0 to I.C0 6,

-0o-w z 3*(40 0*m 30 CD 6 00 00 0 z o*3..cn m-5.3 6 co Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O0)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment II No. M02ilA2!L.

.-Equip. Class 1 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description HPSW to RHR Emergencvlttter-Cross-tie Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R2-6 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] Np of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y'N[IIJ UD[ N/Al]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YP(ND UD] N/AD oxidation?

4-. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yp( ND UD N/AD 73I WCi CAP mL)wT(?( 1() ST-jaT-LCT2AL 5r,7g 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEi NEI U] N/Ag (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of *N- E U'-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrPnnndi'nr.

Nn* RR-19-171 C-274 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. M02-10-17%4 Equip. Class 2 (08a) Motor Oerated Valves Equipment Description HPSW to RHR Emergencythqri-Cross-tie Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI U[ N/AD gNO U[ N/AD Y3 NE UE- N/AEl Y4NEI 01 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added asnecessary)

NIA Evaluated by: (kn C % ý ýDate: ./3 4! ..bi L-261< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrP-nnnI~nf-n.

In* R.R-19-173 C-275

.- 0; 3 m z ~m~0 C 2 CD 0 r..3 0-.4 Sheet I of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. M02-23-014 Equip. Class 1 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description' HPCI Turbine Steam Supply Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 88 Room, Area R2-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE t YX NiL UE N/AU1 Y eND UE N/AE YX NO UE N/AU YE NE UD YXND UTE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rlnrrPq.nnndPnr.i Nn -R;-12-173 C-277 Sheet 2 of 2...... Equipment ID No. M02-23-014 Equip. Class" 2 (08a) MotorOperated Valves Equipment Description HPCI Turbine Steam Supply Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

NEI U[ N/AI'8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX NO UE] N/AD: and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

-5e&% I,, Dr oA :vh~~d or4 e .seCVir y 4 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yj NEl U" N/ADl 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y N UI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YXN[l uiOi Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NIA Evaluated by:)(z Date: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrP~nnnr1~nrp Nn

  • R5-19-17.C-278

-z o 0 3u C.)m-0 C.-5.CD Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. M02-30-2233A Equip. Clas12 (08al Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description Unit 2 Sluice Gate A Location:

Bldg. Screen House Floor El. 116 Room, Area S/H-4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YXNfl 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

'V 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface , oxidation?

S5ee 6jn* 4 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NE- UE N/AD keNEI UL- N/AO N" U[] N/AE]NO UL! N/AO N/NEI- U-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrPmnnnndPnnr Nn

  • R5-19-17.T C-280 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. M02-30-2233A Equip. ClassU (08'a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description Unit 2 Sluice Gate A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

'NO -- -Y'XNCZI UnI N/AE3 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI UE] N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y(NEI Urn N/AD NDUD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additiopal pages may be added as necessary)

If qY1O'tUL rivr e4o a'o 4V o Evaluated by: CX Date:0)< C-4)I Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rlnrrP.nnndPnrp Nn

  • RR-19-17.C-281

-~0 0 0 C.)M -0 m-o C 3 CD-a.5 a N)C,, 0 N, N)CA)CA)

-0~OD CD ( D< >n z 0.CD 0 CA)

OD 0 33 -03 m 3 CD 0 r!%0 CA x ,-~ 0~b z ~* ~~0 23 -u cn-J ~0 C N)m-o C-5.3 CD-I.0 N, CA)0 N, N, CA)CA)

A(3 Er D 0 wo 0 C/)0 c m 30 CD~0 PO CD CA)

Equipment ID: M02-30-2233A Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrF~nnnrl~nr.p Nn* RR-19-17.C-287 Sheet I of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ME-32-2486 Equip. Class1 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description HPSW Return Valve to Discharge Pond Location:

Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 121 Room, Area D/G-2 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?VaO(Ve. is tLin... r 4vtea*5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NO1 YM NEIUE3 Yo NEI UE1 YN NEI UD N/rAt N14 6*" jr/AQl N1405"ý-2..

YEI NEI U0I N/Aj0 YjqNEI UE1 1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn

  • RR-19-17.1 C-288 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. M02-32-2486 Equip. Class" 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description HPSWReturn Valve to Discharge Pond Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

A16 szr YNI u NN f/17/-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YWJ NO U0 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Nb C hedA.Z4 l ave aimU 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YNI NEI U!] N/Al]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y)NNEI UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NE UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: __ ___8/(_L i.)-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrP-nnndrnr.P Mn

  • I.q-19-171 C-289

=r)3 CD 0 CA m 30 CD CD NO 0)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. M02-48-2804A Equip. Class 1 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description HPSWDischarge Inlet Outer Valve Location:

Bldg. Emergency Floor El. 114 Room, Area ECT-1 Cooling Towers (Vdvie' pit-)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YDNI YP NO UE N/AO Y[N NEl UD N/AOl Xll NEl UDI N/A.YO NEI UI N/I4 Y1 NO UQl 12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 *0 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3.nrrmnnndrnrP.

Nn

  • R.-19-17.C-291 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. M02-48-2804A Equip. Class'2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description HPSW Discharge Inlet Outer Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

/-d0 'ýOj+ +"Z4~~f Y7 NE UE N/Al!8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yms NEI U-] N/AL]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Ah ' / -Oe,11eye

&C1bg d a.rt ' e 4 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?UD N/AD]YJ NE U-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI U-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: ,A~DatelW2f/-.d/

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrPqnnndrInr.

Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-292

-o Pr ~3 00 0 -0I, CA m m0 C CD 0 00 Sheaf 4N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. _______ -___' Equip. Class=P (t0) A ri ticleJrc Equipment Description M] F5$'VVN P Rooi A Lmno- ll I )or" ii gt 5"/Vp f', Location:

Bldg.fAJn 5' a ee Floor El. "jil), Room, Area " Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE: N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y NE! UO N/AE!Y) NE! UM N/AE!4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y .NEI UO N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE!" NEI UD N/Ap((Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YNEI UD laEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrmnnnH~nrc.P Nn ' RR-19-173 C-294 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. Equip. Class- ( 0' r Itr 2 A /(5 Equipment Description 14PS P um fiip R~oom A-1.090 -i~y&,p~ v'Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

.go c, 4`1 6o 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y)4 ND UD N/AD YXND UD N/ADND UD N/AD YlND IUD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yy ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary T P n EE r: -T u ,, rod-e8 4 rv4-PfoPWe a4, :." ,)ffve4,C1endiiccv( mor)Or¶k j P-Aa 4 P0&I

  • O~ el"k(d ~;144-1 UA ,ldIA f 1'Evaluated by: 4'IYfv~~fl 7& ~4~-Date: ' ik]tb? 0 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 ,nrrP-nnnri-nr.A Nn* RR-19-173 C-295

-~0 D 3'z 0 3.0 m.0 2 5-u 0'p r'3 0 I 0 N, (A) z ~o z *0 0 m-o C.0 0 IN.CA, Sheet I of 2 Status- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)4EnE /C101/0 Equipment MD No. Pe trn Equip. ClaSS12Q--)

AIR 144LQk2 V11H PTh PDO 9 ,1,1P o lprpg-J '4 A J "",'--Efli -nmnt esctrintion LW CL)Location:

Bldg. NmP El. 11l2 Room, Area P11 -Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.,As the item one YrI No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

r-io/cgi 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y5 NEI U[" N/Al-Yb"ND UEI N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? NEI UED N/A[]V)6 POfl)ATVC C6JNM'C00P tueýI.I&R~

tiMPPtP AIJI SVP0WOr p!Zmi-,4Lc

)3Rs~- 61.MCY030TY F T)?4tPCZC-STYLL7 DcWIr ttxr ýaL-72% "L rt6U4w VrQ)+ g;PPdzrT 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE! NIl UD] N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4 C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 CnrrPqnnndPnr'p Nn -RR-19-17, C-298 Sheet 2 of 2'3, Equipment ID No. 4 Equip. Class'2 /'l a 41J2 W4N4ALpcl_

Equipment Description , PS. P-aHP R6(6m -M- hi. Jk' k ,c 44 r Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?'3/4 c/~i.YgNE' UE] N/A'YK NO UD N/AO Ya NEI UE N/AC Y[rN- UC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YP NEI UEI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)T&C131Uj TvOU6'I TO W4fPtlz A .PP0 1 2zA4,,.Aiib

£ PT&6'z/) FIp.tui j-Evaluated by: 124i Date: 43Vi/L!" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3.

N n" RR-19-171 C-299

-0w S-0 3 z 0 0 3 c. n m.0-5.2 CD 5-D 0 N)0 I N, 0 N, N, CA)0 She t1of2 Status: 6: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -:f ,-_3-qoq A Equip. Class-2 ( ) (ni ftArt m,e on /z"^,f .d-Equipment Description

-eacfor 27ttr Location:

Bldg. gedc-t" Floor El. IZJL Room, Area 2_2-q>O Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorase 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YNO YES NEI U1 N/Al]Y91 NO U[I N/Al]YNEINO Ul] N/AlO YVJ NO U-] N/A]rP NEI U1I 1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 (ThnrrmnnndPf(-nP Nn " RR-1 -17.C-301 Sheet 2 of 2 EquipmentlDNo.

i'Ta-O6-3-qoq'A Equip. Class1201)

/'jti,-Ve.4

.1 _e/,"S /,Wa1--1 X-CICS Equipment Description

£e4 dar fteS vi't' rr,4,T'--eJ'

'Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YM. NEI UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Ya. NDI UI N/A" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[XL ND UD N/AD Y9 ND UD Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: y4bt~~c-~.

Date: 'r/ 301/1< C-4 )>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 ,nrrPqnnnrIPnnr.P Nn

  • R'-1 9-171 C-302

-. U 0)0 0-4 m C)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: () N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PT-2508 / Equip. Class'2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Containment Drvywell Pressure Transmitter for PR-2508 Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 195 Room, Area R2-53 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YO NPI Y[ NEI U' N/AD Y59 NEI UE N/AO Y10 NO UE N/AD YO- NO UEI N/A9[6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y9[ NO UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

4 t -, '-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 flnrrPqnnndPnnp-Nn *R -1 9-171 C-304 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. PT-2508,B Equip. Classu Q18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Containment D well Pressure Transmitter for PR-2508 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

AJO SoF+ +aode.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YC9 NE UDI N/AU YE) NE U' N/Al]YXI NE UEI N/AU Y([ ND UEI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI[ NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: V Date: V 2/z-/36/~?e~ ia----Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrp.nnndfnr-Nn " RR-19-1 7R C-305

  • CD z -u (40"1 E 0 cl m-3 CD_0 0 0,

-02 C)m 30 CD C)00 Sheet i of 2 Status: (0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlD No. -AT2 --4)o,3 Equip. Class'- (tr) I nslfntr mAl Rn *ft /AJ'A#Oi+-

J1e4kJ I f fkwuinmcnt Descrintion tLA2 4.~ O.,.-......~. -r~ --- ip en1--Fnto JR'.-*a--

a1- go --_--If--o Location:

Bldg. Floor El. I ' " Room, Area 2 -Yo Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorapne

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YJA NO Y%] NEI UO N/AO Y[X NEI U[3 N/AD YK NEI Ur N/AD YEK NEI UO N/A[]P~ ko ra~. :; Yrck rerla per kM+ MAG~IO tc~ ZV-.~'6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yo NEIUO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3.>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rtnrrp-nnndPnr-P Nn " R5-12-17R C-308 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No.. P21 -o& -0'5136 Equip. ClassI2(fI)' ,I P-1c4 p.. t- 0.)" iek;Equipment Description / ,/'CS,/e Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y99 NCI U[I N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX. NEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?o c .t ; , \ 6 r , ,s '6 V ,1 % ý , o , r -0 , , a s .UD N/AD 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y) NDI UD N/AD YI, NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NO UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:.V Date: X /2" A I r k" 3) Z/c)-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrmrnnnr1.nrP Nn -R.R-19-17.1 C-309

-w-.0 z CA 0 CD m-o C 2 CD-4.H 0)01 w Sheet I of 2 Status:S N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RV2-02-07 1N Fuip. Class'2 (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd)

Valves Equipment Description Safety Relief Valve X 6 .A, Location:

Bldg.* Drvwell Floor El. 155 Room, Area D/W21V75" Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?SLi .- ..no.rA'..3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI P YV(N-I UE- N/AO YKNO UE- N/AE YN NE U[ N/AE YEI NEI UI- N/AgNEI UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 ('nrrPqnnnrA-nr.P Nn Rq-19-17.C-311 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. RV2-02-071N6 Equip Class'2 (07) Fluid (Air/I-Id)

Valves Equipment Description Safet Ielief Valve X(Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free fro/n impact by nearby equipment.or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO4NEJ UO. N/A" YX ND UD N/AD Y" NO UD N/AD Y)NE U .Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YKND UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by: Date:< C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrmnnndPnr.

Nn

  • RR-19-17'C-312

-~CD~~~:, ~~~CJi~:~z ~* ~~* 0~u -u CD L-J fi;.0 C r.j m-o C V 3 CD 5 0 0-4 0 Sheet 1 of 2 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment-ID-Ne.--V-2-02mOT0 E- ui-CIN -(7-FWJuAi/I-d-ves Equipment Description Safet Relie Valve X Location:

Bldg. D rvwell Floor El. 155 Room, Area D/W2-\ 3'5ah,- j4./ mn, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?-j Lr- M'ort)M~3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NX~xY( NEI YXNO Y; NEI UE3 N/A[Un N/All UI-I N/AD Y-I NEI UE- N/Ag Y~( NEI Un 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3nr1n nr.P Nn

  • RR-19-17 .C-314

,, KSheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. RV2-02-071lIA Equip. Class'" f07) Fluid (Air/Hvd)

Valves Equipment Description SafetN Relief Valve )Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YXNED Un N/AD YýK NO UE N/AD Y)(NI UD N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A' ." Evaluated Date: '9/ 3/z< C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 No

  • RR-19-171 C-315

-~0'D ;U 3 0 0 --0(T:3 I*.Po 6-4 (D-4 5 0 0 2-0C z o*0 3* 0 0, ,-~cn m 30 CD 6o-4 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SV2-23A-4543 Equip. Class 1 2 (08b) Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description HPCI Turbine Stop Valve Remote Trip Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 88 Room, Area R2-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoratie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI N YX ND UD N/AD Y) ND UD N/AUlUFO N/AD YD N[D] UQ N/Aý(YJ(N- UD 12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrqnnnrhi.nr.P Nn RR-19-171 C-318 Sheet 2 of 2 EquipmentID No. SV2-23A-4543

-- Equip. Class 1 2 (08b) Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description HPCI Turbine Stop Valve Remote Trip Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

N.Ao a 0 s YX NE UEO N/AUl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NEI U'I N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y [ UEI N/A[U 1,0 oolr- 1; (Ea4*'ot)ýNEI U[iI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YANEI UE1 adversely affect the safety. functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NIA Evaluated by:~94~Date: X Al-ýOf Z aI iL< C.4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn

  • R.R-12-171 C-319

-D a)0 CD*0.3 -to 4v 01 m C.CD 5

=ru-~0-~CD 3-0 0. c CD CD CiD coi Sheet I of 2 Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)E5n'.8;-3-323-Equipment IID No. -V--2A Equip. Class 1 (08b) Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description Instrument Air Solenoid Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Area R2-22 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NO Y)NEI Ui" N/AE YNE UE3 N/AE Yd NE UE' N/ADl YEI NEI Ur N/A19 YK) NEI UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rf.nrrP-qnnndrPnrA.

Nn

  • RS-19-171 C-322 Sheet 2 of 2 33 Equipment ID No. SV-2-3-32A?2 Equip. Class" 2 (08b) Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description Instrument Air Solenoid Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NO UD N/AD YF ND UD N/AD YrrNEI U[L] N/AEI Y~rNEI U[E Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y)N NEI U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: .91304., 7,/,1.-1.<C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrP..qnnndPnr.p Nn " RI;-19-17.1 C-323

~CD* 0 m m0 C.CD.-0 0 UC-n 00a 0 2 CD z Er~0 cn m 30 cn Sheet I of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -S 4-34-- Equip. Class 1 2 (08b) Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description Instrument Air Solenoid Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Area R2-22 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NIO YCJ NEI UE- N/Afl YK N[3 UEI N/A[!Y NEI UfI N/AE!YE! NEI UO N/A[Z YCI NEI UEI 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment."C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 flnrrP-nnndP.nr.

Nn

  • RI,-19-17R C-326 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. SV-2-3-361f Equip. Class 2 (08b) Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description Instrument Air Solenoid Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

NEI UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y ND3 UE N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

FV~o ,v,* i m r (,~ ' , Jnt1 cke Jdi 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?/N NE] UD N/ADNND UDI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no. other seismic conditions that could YO NDI. UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: /(.

Date: -gS. ho Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3..nrriqnnndr.nr.P.

Nn RR-1 9-171 C-327

-.0>DS z"0 m 30 CD-o r2.

,-CD~~, ww-~ 0~* 0 C,)~ -u CD L-J ~0: 0 C m-o c CD'-I.C,, 0)

Sheet i of 2 Status:()

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) 'Equipment I.D No. .Equip. ,, 9; e Equipment Descripti .on 5" Loaton Blg9ma_ lor Room. Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document.the results pf 'the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of tlh0f~llowing quegtions may b6 used to record the results of.judgments and* " findings.

Addiiional spaQe'is providediat.thfi end of -this checklist ftdocut~enting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

, 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

  • '.4, Is the anchorage freeofvi'si4be cracks in the concrete near.thd anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y{JNQ' U[I- N/AI-Yd NEI UE- N/AO*Y Xcj 1) 'N/AO 1- ON/AO V~N'" ' .I: 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4 C-3>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrmnnndH.nrP.

Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-330 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. T5"-2.ZOa,2-L-0 Equip. Class'..-

r JAI e Equipment Description

/Lf/' .1 J Roo't1 0 rarh ,+Interaction Effects ii.. , 7. Are soft targets free fromi impact by nearby equipmentr structhres?

Y N UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y 0 UQ N/AD and mnsonry block walls not likely to collapse the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? UD Oi N/AD-..' .I"" "." 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Uo Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y4TND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

C t ( t Comments (Additional

  • pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: 7 /-DS--/ -, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 CnrrP.nnnHP~nr.P Nn

  • R.R-19-17.

C-331

  • 0 z, -' 3 LO m 30 m.5o co a 3 '.0* 0.cn Er ~0 m, 30 cn
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A030&oldid=908305"