|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML14162A2242014-05-28028 May 2014
Commemt (25) of Nathan J. Young on Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Renewal, Ottawa County, Ohio
ML14122A0312014-04-22022 April 2014
Comment (23) of Kevin Kamps on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0262014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (18) of Michael Leonardi on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0222014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (14) of Jim Sherman Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0302014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (22) of Kevin Kamps on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0292014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (21) of Keven Kamps on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0282014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (20) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear, Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0272014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (19) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear, Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0252014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (17) of Connie Hammond on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0242014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (16) of Kathy Barnes Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0232014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (15) of Bill Katakis on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0212014-04-20020 April 2014
Comment (13) of Patricia Marida on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0202014-04-18018 April 2014
Comment (12) of Anthony Szilagye on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14112A0752014-04-14014 April 2014
Comment (8) of Victoria Clemons on NUREG-1437, Supplement 52, Generic Environmental Impact Statement Regarding Davis Besse Nuclear Power Station
ML14113A4252014-04-10010 April 2014
Comment (9) of Kenneth A. Westlake on Behalf of EPA on Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 52 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1
ML14098A0242014-04-0303 April 2014
Comment (3) of Jamie Beier Grant on Behalf of the Ottawa County Improvement Corporation on Environmental Impacts of Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station
ML14098A0282014-04-0303 April 2014
Comment (7) of Sierra Club Nuclear Free Campaign Re Davis-Besse Draft SEIS
ML14098A0232014-03-28028 March 2014
Comment (2) of Paul Szymanowski Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14091A2472014-03-26026 March 2014
Comment (1) of Melissa Powell on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14098A0272014-03-25025 March 2014
Comment (6) of Victoria Clemons Re Davis-Besse Draft SEIS
ML14098A0262014-03-25025 March 2014
Comment (5) of Terry J. Lodge, on of Behalf Beyond Nuclear, Don'T Waste Michigan and the Citizens Environment Alliance of Southwestern Ontario, Opposing Draft SEIS for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Operating License Extension
ML14098A0252014-03-25025 March 2014
Comment (4) of Dan Rutt Opposing Davis-Besse Re-licensing
ML13023A3842012-12-14014 December 2012
Comment (269) of Deborah W. Harris on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML13022A4962012-12-13013 December 2012
Comment (248) of Deb Brown on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012
Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3932012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (97) of Donna Selquist on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3882012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (92) of Geri Collecchia on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3872012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (91) of Kenneth Clark on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML11116A1242011-04-22022 April 2011
Comment (27) of Cate Renner Opposing the Relicensing of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant
ML1106805152011-03-0707 March 2011
Comment (8) of Patricia Marida on Behalf of Ohio Sierra Club, Opposing Proposed 20-Year Operating Extension for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Reactor
ML1106805122011-03-0707 March 2011
Comment (7) of Jane Ridenour on Behalf of Office & Professional Employees International Union, Supporting Davis Besse License Renewal
ML1106804552011-01-21021 January 2011
Comment (26) of Leonard Bildstein on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License
ML1106804532011-01-17017 January 2011
Comment (24) of Susan Jones on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License
ML1106804542011-01-15015 January 2011
Comment (25) of George M. Williams, on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License
ML1106804522011-01-0707 January 2011
Comment (23) of Joan Lang on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License
ML1106804492011-01-0505 January 2011
Comment (21) of George M. Williams, on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicense
ML1106804512011-01-0505 January 2011
Comment (22) of Amanda Baldino on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License
ML1100602892010-12-16016 December 2010
Comment (2) of Mary M. Knapp, on Behalf of Us Dept of Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service, on Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement & Scoping Process for Davis-Besse, Unit 1 Renewal of License for Additional 20 Years of Operation
ML1106805192010-12-13013 December 2010
Comment (11) of Marilyn & Paul Nusser, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicense
ML1106805102010-11-0404 November 2010
Comment (6) of Unknown Author, on Behalf of First Energy Corp. on Proposed 20-Year Operating Extension for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Reactor
ML1106805182010-11-0404 November 2010
Comment (10) of Dennis J. Kucinich on Behalf of Us House of Representatives, Opposing Davis-Besse for 20-year License Extension
ML1106805172010-09-20020 September 2010
Comment (9) of Joseph Demare on Transformer Fire Cause of 2009 at Davis-Besse Not Determined
ML0511202392005-04-15015 April 2005
Comment (3) of Mary Lampert, Deborah Katz, Rochelle Becker, Brendan Hoffman, David Agnew, Jed Thorp and Jim Warren on Federal Register Notice Dated 02/28/2005 Re Station Blackout Risk Evaluation for Nuclear Power Plants (Draft), January 200
ML0504800502005-01-14014 January 2005
Comment (198) of Wanda S. Ballentine Re No More Nuclear Plants!!!. NRC to Retract the Early Site Permit for the North Anna Nuclear Project
ML0526501512004-11-12012 November 2004
Comment (1) of David M. Collins of Dominion Nuclear Connecticut on Draft Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-xx Establishing and Maintaining a SCWE
ML0432402302004-11-12012 November 2004
Comment (1) of David M. Collins on Public Comments - RIS on SCWE
ML0408302512004-03-16016 March 2004
Comment (3) of Don Eggett Regarding Best Practices to Establish and Maintain a Safety Conscious Work Environment
ML0324104142003-08-22022 August 2003
Comment (19) of Andrew Berna-Hicks Re Aging Nuclear Energy Plants
ML0300700302002-12-31031 December 2002
Comment from Raymond Shadis, New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution on the Third Year of Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process
ML0233705312002-11-27027 November 2002
Comment from S. Kasturi Opposing Reactor Oversight Process and PIs
2014-05-28
[Table view] |
Text
Page 1 of I,ULES E" ECTIESAs of: April 24, 2014Received:
April 21, 2014PUBLIC SUBMISSION 2Status:
PendingPost PUBLI 'RUBMISSION0:
5 9 Tracking No. ljy-8bolI-m4xw Comments Due: April 21, 2014Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2010-0298
\/ fl_Receipt and Availability of Application for License Renew) Fa I V LComment On: NRC-2010-0298-0033 License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit I; Draft Supplemental GenericEnvironmental Impact Statement Document:
NRC-2010-0298-DRAFT-0039 Comment on FR Doc # 2014-05021 Submitter Information Name: Kathy BarnesAddress:PO Box 26Sherwood, MI, 49089Email: greenwoodsart@
msn.comGeneral CommentRe: Docket ID NRC-2010-0298 The relicensing of Davis Besse Nuclear Power Plant:I am opposed to relicensing Davis Besse for a variety of reasons.
I will try to be clear and concise:l. Davis Besse creates nuclear waste. There is no solution to the safe storage of nuclear waste. It remains toxic forlonger than anyone can guarantee its safe storage.
There is no way to dispose of it that would not endanger theenvironment sooner or later. When businesses
- pollute, they should be shut down.2. Davis Besse has had a history of huge running cracks. Even though the cracks are "patched" the real problemhas not been solved. What is causing the cracking?
Because cracking could lead to containment compromise, including a full blown melt down, I believe Davis Besse and its cracks should be shut down and decommissioned, not relicensed.
- 3. Just like Consumers Power promised to repair Palisades, what happened after it was relicensed?
CP sold it toEntergy who still has not done the repairs CP thought necessary, and were contingent upon relicensing.
The NRChas not made Entergy do the repairs, but has left it up to Entergy to decide whether the repairs are necessary ornot. Meanwhile, Palisades has had leaks, come close to melt downs, and sump pump failure etc.....Davis Bessealso may run the risk of being resold..
.possibly to a foreign nation if they can unload it that way.....and not dorepairs.4. Even if 'repaired' Davis Besse is not a good investment.
As a taxpayer I am horrified the government uses mytax dollars to subsidize the nuclear industry.
- 5. Sometimes the best thing to do is to quit trying to fix a broken thing. When a car rusts out underneath, you don'tkeep driving it down the road even though the engine is still running.
You shouldn't allow a dangerous nuclear....aging .....power plant to keep operatfng.
The risk is too great. -, 3[ttps://www.
dmss.grv/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09ý48164816bfaf2&for...
04/24/2014
