|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML14162A2242014-05-28028 May 2014 Commemt (25) of Nathan J. Young on Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Renewal, Ottawa County, Ohio ML14122A0312014-04-22022 April 2014 Comment (23) of Kevin Kamps on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14122A0262014-04-21021 April 2014 Comment (18) of Michael Leonardi on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14122A0222014-04-21021 April 2014 Comment (14) of Jim Sherman Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14122A0302014-04-21021 April 2014 Comment (22) of Kevin Kamps on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14122A0292014-04-21021 April 2014 Comment (21) of Keven Kamps on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14122A0282014-04-21021 April 2014 Comment (20) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear, Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14122A0272014-04-21021 April 2014 Comment (19) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear, Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14122A0252014-04-21021 April 2014 Comment (17) of Connie Hammond on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14122A0242014-04-21021 April 2014 Comment (16) of Kathy Barnes Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14122A0232014-04-21021 April 2014 Comment (15) of Bill Katakis on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14122A0212014-04-20020 April 2014 Comment (13) of Patricia Marida on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14122A0202014-04-18018 April 2014 Comment (12) of Anthony Szilagye on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14112A0752014-04-14014 April 2014 Comment (8) of Victoria Clemons on NUREG-1437, Supplement 52, Generic Environmental Impact Statement Regarding Davis Besse Nuclear Power Station ML14113A4252014-04-10010 April 2014 Comment (9) of Kenneth A. Westlake on Behalf of EPA on Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 52 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 ML14098A0242014-04-0303 April 2014 Comment (3) of Jamie Beier Grant on Behalf of the Ottawa County Improvement Corporation on Environmental Impacts of Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station ML14098A0282014-04-0303 April 2014 Comment (7) of Sierra Club Nuclear Free Campaign Re Davis-Besse Draft SEIS ML14098A0232014-03-28028 March 2014 Comment (2) of Paul Szymanowski Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14091A2472014-03-26026 March 2014 Comment (1) of Melissa Powell on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ML14098A0272014-03-25025 March 2014 Comment (6) of Victoria Clemons Re Davis-Besse Draft SEIS ML14098A0262014-03-25025 March 2014 Comment (5) of Terry J. Lodge, on of Behalf Beyond Nuclear, Don'T Waste Michigan and the Citizens Environment Alliance of Southwestern Ontario, Opposing Draft SEIS for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Operating License Extension ML14098A0252014-03-25025 March 2014 Comment (4) of Dan Rutt Opposing Davis-Besse Re-licensing ML13023A3842012-12-14014 December 2012 Comment (269) of Deborah W. Harris on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML13022A4962012-12-13013 December 2012 Comment (248) of Deb Brown on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012 Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML12334A3932012-11-21021 November 2012 Comment (97) of Donna Selquist on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML12334A3882012-11-21021 November 2012 Comment (92) of Geri Collecchia on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML12334A3872012-11-21021 November 2012 Comment (91) of Kenneth Clark on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML11116A1242011-04-22022 April 2011 Comment (27) of Cate Renner Opposing the Relicensing of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant ML1106805152011-03-0707 March 2011 Comment (8) of Patricia Marida on Behalf of Ohio Sierra Club, Opposing Proposed 20-Year Operating Extension for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Reactor ML1106805122011-03-0707 March 2011 Comment (7) of Jane Ridenour on Behalf of Office & Professional Employees International Union, Supporting Davis Besse License Renewal ML1106804552011-01-21021 January 2011 Comment (26) of Leonard Bildstein on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License ML1106804532011-01-17017 January 2011 Comment (24) of Susan Jones on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License ML1106804542011-01-15015 January 2011 Comment (25) of George M. Williams, on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License ML1106804522011-01-0707 January 2011 Comment (23) of Joan Lang on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License ML1106804492011-01-0505 January 2011 Comment (21) of George M. Williams, on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicense ML1106804512011-01-0505 January 2011 Comment (22) of Amanda Baldino on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License ML1100602892010-12-16016 December 2010 Comment (2) of Mary M. Knapp, on Behalf of Us Dept of Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service, on Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement & Scoping Process for Davis-Besse, Unit 1 Renewal of License for Additional 20 Years of Operation ML1106805192010-12-13013 December 2010 Comment (11) of Marilyn & Paul Nusser, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicense ML1106805102010-11-0404 November 2010 Comment (6) of Unknown Author, on Behalf of First Energy Corp. on Proposed 20-Year Operating Extension for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Reactor ML1106805182010-11-0404 November 2010 Comment (10) of Dennis J. Kucinich on Behalf of Us House of Representatives, Opposing Davis-Besse for 20-year License Extension ML1106805172010-09-20020 September 2010 Comment (9) of Joseph Demare on Transformer Fire Cause of 2009 at Davis-Besse Not Determined ML0511202392005-04-15015 April 2005 Comment (3) of Mary Lampert, Deborah Katz, Rochelle Becker, Brendan Hoffman, David Agnew, Jed Thorp and Jim Warren on Federal Register Notice Dated 02/28/2005 Re Station Blackout Risk Evaluation for Nuclear Power Plants (Draft), January 200 ML0504800502005-01-14014 January 2005 Comment (198) of Wanda S. Ballentine Re No More Nuclear Plants!!!. NRC to Retract the Early Site Permit for the North Anna Nuclear Project ML0526501512004-11-12012 November 2004 Comment (1) of David M. Collins of Dominion Nuclear Connecticut on Draft Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-xx Establishing and Maintaining a SCWE ML0432402302004-11-12012 November 2004 Comment (1) of David M. Collins on Public Comments - RIS on SCWE ML0408302512004-03-16016 March 2004 Comment (3) of Don Eggett Regarding Best Practices to Establish and Maintain a Safety Conscious Work Environment ML0324104142003-08-22022 August 2003 Comment (19) of Andrew Berna-Hicks Re Aging Nuclear Energy Plants ML0300700302002-12-31031 December 2002 Comment from Raymond Shadis, New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution on the Third Year of Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process ML0233705312002-11-27027 November 2002 Comment from S. Kasturi Opposing Reactor Oversight Process and PIs 2014-05-28
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 h~~)
Zn C-I-117/X 77 I-1~ Cf-,
'N, SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03
&,I,)A)
Testimony at NRC Public Hearing Re: Davis-Besse Re-licensing March 25, 2014 My name is Dan Rutt. So, what are my credentials for being here tonight? I live in the kill zone of Davis-Besse. I have lived in the kill zone of nuclear plants almost my entire life. I suspect few could argue against the mournful reality that way too many people share these credentials.
I do have a B.S. in Biology. Though, I must confess, my B.S. pales in comparison to the B.S. of the nuclear industry and the NRC.
I also have a masters degree in public health. But I am not here to debate technical minutiae, nor to discuss the arrangement of deck chairs, the lack of lifeboats, nor the alleged unsinkability of the titanic nuclear industry.
Today, I am here as a poet and an activist. I am here as a child of mother earth and as a planetary citizen. Most importantly, I am here today as a prophet. And let it be said: nothing today will truer be said than that the nuclear industry and the NRC listen to profits!
I am here to do the impossible. I am here to topple a multi-billion dollar corporate empire with a mere wisp of democracy -- approximately 3 minutes worth.
Unfortunately, the NRC's plan to protect itself from democracy is much stronger than it's plans to protect us from nuclear disasters.
When the NRC circus comes to town, their death-defying prestidigitations may very well make you gasp. Still, we will be safely confined to grandstanding. This dog and pony show might allow us to bitch until we are hoarse. But, at the end of the day, the elephant in the middle of the big, flimsy tent, will do its thing, and the little people of this world will be left with the mess. And the NRC circus will skip town, to continue their tour de farce.
So, I am here to do the impossible. I am here to speak for a thousand generations in 3 minutes. Usually such hope and possibility requires the venue of something like American Idol. Well, my friends, we have an American idol: the nuclear industry. This American idol has reigned for 70 years. This American idol has rained nuclear waste across this great land. And today, 70 years later, as the waste of the nuclear fat cats grows larger, they offer a 600-page tome as their litter. And
who dares wade through this litter box? Who dares to think inside this box? Who of us will not be pooped out? Can anyone venturing into this 600-page tomb view it as anything but a deathly undertaking? What box can possibly hold such eternally reigning transgressions? Do you have a staff member called Pandora by any chance?! There is only one sane solution: let's idle this idol! The solution is simple: we must end nuclear generations to end nuclear generations.
The ultimate question for today is: In our call to shut Davis-Besse down, will we be heard?
Sure, NRC staff will herd our comments into another neatly formatted tome. But will we be heard? Sure, the decision-makers have ears, and stenographers, and word processors. But will we be heard?
Will the people affected by nuclear power generation be heard? They call this a public hearing. But the reality is that it is physically and metaphysically impossible for over 99% of those affected by Davis-Besse's nuclear waste to be here -- for the simple fact that they have not even been born yet. Will we weigh the testimony today to account for their interests, the interests of future generations?
Can you hear our great grandchildren cry out into the not-so-great ears of today's nuclear executives: Why did you poison our world for a few kilowatts?
Can you hear our great, great grandchildren cry out into the not-so-great ears of today's First Energy shareholders: Why did you rob our future for a few profits today?
Can you hear our great, great, great grandchildren cry out into the not-so-great ears of today's parade of crooning cronies, sometimes called politicians: Why did you sell out your communities for a little patronage?
But.. .what if we are truly heard today? Then we might just hear:
The gentle whispers of our great, great, great, great, great grandchildren saying "good job" to the employees in the former nuclear industry -- and by "good job" they don't mean thanks for taking that decent paying job, but rather, holding out and demanding good jobs, jobs friendly to both working families and our environment.
If we are truly heard today, then we might just hear: the gentle whispers of our great, great, great, great, great, great grandchildren thanking the nameless thousands across this great land who worked for neither wages nor shareholder profits, but rather, worked freely for a world where it doesn't pay to destroy our environment.
We must listen to our future generations. If not us, who? If not now, when?
As for me, in this generation, I will gladly live without Davis-Besse. I will gladly trade the sliver of energy produced during my lifetime to spare thousands of generations the poison of nuclear waste. Though make no mistake, even if the problem of nuclear waste disposal was somehow miraculously solved, I would still gladly trade this energy source simply to avoid the probability of a nuclear catastrophe from the safety disaster that Davis-Besse has so proven. Shut it down!
Please listen to the prophets who seek the good of all, not the profits which only enrich the few, at the expense of the 99%. THANK YOU!
Good Job by Dan Rutt, alias "Top Pun" (it'sjust, my pun name)
It was early Monday mourning When the Davis-Besse nuclear plant Finally ruptured At the base of Lake Eerie Weeping poison From the once-great lakes Now a watery grave for both sellers And consumers Of atomic drivel For what human remains The event became known Simply as "The rupture" Leaving sleepy millions In its wake Sucked into a glowing sky For who knows watt Feudal to press release Fore their heavenly reword A paradise rolled Entranced buy snake eyes In charge of all that meters
Relegating us to hoarse power Silent partners Dealt a roil flush In a conniving casino Pain only in skullduggery Forging height reason And absolute faith in stonewall As a bet A dark wager Echoing in the empty halls Of unions and congress "Good job"