|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML14162A2242014-05-28028 May 2014
Commemt (25) of Nathan J. Young on Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Renewal, Ottawa County, Ohio
ML14122A0312014-04-22022 April 2014
Comment (23) of Kevin Kamps on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0262014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (18) of Michael Leonardi on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0222014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (14) of Jim Sherman Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0302014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (22) of Kevin Kamps on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0292014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (21) of Keven Kamps on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0282014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (20) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear, Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0272014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (19) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear, Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0252014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (17) of Connie Hammond on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0242014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (16) of Kathy Barnes Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0232014-04-21021 April 2014
Comment (15) of Bill Katakis on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0212014-04-20020 April 2014
Comment (13) of Patricia Marida on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14122A0202014-04-18018 April 2014
Comment (12) of Anthony Szilagye on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14112A0752014-04-14014 April 2014
Comment (8) of Victoria Clemons on NUREG-1437, Supplement 52, Generic Environmental Impact Statement Regarding Davis Besse Nuclear Power Station
ML14113A4252014-04-10010 April 2014
Comment (9) of Kenneth A. Westlake on Behalf of EPA on Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 52 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1
ML14098A0242014-04-0303 April 2014
Comment (3) of Jamie Beier Grant on Behalf of the Ottawa County Improvement Corporation on Environmental Impacts of Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station
ML14098A0282014-04-0303 April 2014
Comment (7) of Sierra Club Nuclear Free Campaign Re Davis-Besse Draft SEIS
ML14098A0232014-03-28028 March 2014
Comment (2) of Paul Szymanowski Opposing License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14091A2472014-03-26026 March 2014
Comment (1) of Melissa Powell on License Renewal Application for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML14098A0272014-03-25025 March 2014
Comment (6) of Victoria Clemons Re Davis-Besse Draft SEIS
ML14098A0262014-03-25025 March 2014
Comment (5) of Terry J. Lodge, on of Behalf Beyond Nuclear, Don'T Waste Michigan and the Citizens Environment Alliance of Southwestern Ontario, Opposing Draft SEIS for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Operating License Extension
ML14098A0252014-03-25025 March 2014
Comment (4) of Dan Rutt Opposing Davis-Besse Re-licensing
ML13023A3842012-12-14014 December 2012
Comment (269) of Deborah W. Harris on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML13022A4962012-12-13013 December 2012
Comment (248) of Deb Brown on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012
Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3932012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (97) of Donna Selquist on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3882012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (92) of Geri Collecchia on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3872012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (91) of Kenneth Clark on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML11116A1242011-04-22022 April 2011
Comment (27) of Cate Renner Opposing the Relicensing of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant
ML1106805152011-03-0707 March 2011
Comment (8) of Patricia Marida on Behalf of Ohio Sierra Club, Opposing Proposed 20-Year Operating Extension for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Reactor
ML1106805122011-03-0707 March 2011
Comment (7) of Jane Ridenour on Behalf of Office & Professional Employees International Union, Supporting Davis Besse License Renewal
ML1106804552011-01-21021 January 2011
Comment (26) of Leonard Bildstein on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License
ML1106804532011-01-17017 January 2011
Comment (24) of Susan Jones on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License
ML1106804542011-01-15015 January 2011
Comment (25) of George M. Williams, on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License
ML1106804522011-01-0707 January 2011
Comment (23) of Joan Lang on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License
ML1106804492011-01-0505 January 2011
Comment (21) of George M. Williams, on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicense
ML1106804512011-01-0505 January 2011
Comment (22) of Amanda Baldino on Behalf of Self, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicensing and Wants NRC to End Its Operating License
ML1100602892010-12-16016 December 2010
Comment (2) of Mary M. Knapp, on Behalf of Us Dept of Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service, on Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement & Scoping Process for Davis-Besse, Unit 1 Renewal of License for Additional 20 Years of Operation
ML1106805192010-12-13013 December 2010
Comment (11) of Marilyn & Paul Nusser, Opposing Davis-Besse Relicense
ML1106805102010-11-0404 November 2010
Comment (6) of Unknown Author, on Behalf of First Energy Corp. on Proposed 20-Year Operating Extension for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Reactor
ML1106805182010-11-0404 November 2010
Comment (10) of Dennis J. Kucinich on Behalf of Us House of Representatives, Opposing Davis-Besse for 20-year License Extension
ML1106805172010-09-20020 September 2010
Comment (9) of Joseph Demare on Transformer Fire Cause of 2009 at Davis-Besse Not Determined
ML0511202392005-04-15015 April 2005
Comment (3) of Mary Lampert, Deborah Katz, Rochelle Becker, Brendan Hoffman, David Agnew, Jed Thorp and Jim Warren on Federal Register Notice Dated 02/28/2005 Re Station Blackout Risk Evaluation for Nuclear Power Plants (Draft), January 200
ML0504800502005-01-14014 January 2005
Comment (198) of Wanda S. Ballentine Re No More Nuclear Plants!!!. NRC to Retract the Early Site Permit for the North Anna Nuclear Project
ML0526501512004-11-12012 November 2004
Comment (1) of David M. Collins of Dominion Nuclear Connecticut on Draft Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-xx Establishing and Maintaining a SCWE
ML0432402302004-11-12012 November 2004
Comment (1) of David M. Collins on Public Comments - RIS on SCWE
ML0408302512004-03-16016 March 2004
Comment (3) of Don Eggett Regarding Best Practices to Establish and Maintain a Safety Conscious Work Environment
ML0324104142003-08-22022 August 2003
Comment (19) of Andrew Berna-Hicks Re Aging Nuclear Energy Plants
ML0300700302002-12-31031 December 2002
Comment from Raymond Shadis, New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution on the Third Year of Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process
ML0233705312002-11-27027 November 2002
Comment from S. Kasturi Opposing Reactor Oversight Process and PIs
2014-05-28
[Table view] |
Text
-- - I 1LRGEISUPdate - aing nuclear energy lants Page Paae 11 LRGEISUdate - aaing nuclear enemy plants From: Andy Bema-Hicks <abernahi~yahoo.com>
To: <LRGEISUpdatelnrc.gov> 6 Date: Fri, Aug 22, 2003 2:45 PM
Subject:
aging nuclear energy plants
Dear U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
The NRC, the federal agency charged with controlling the nuclear-power industry, is re-evaluating the criteria it uses when considering applications for license extensions for reactors that have reached the end of the 40-year operating life allowed by their original permits.
The NRC has processed 16 such license-renewal applications, and in all cases it allowed the plants' corporate owners to run them for another 20 years.
But these plants were dangerous to begin with, and after 40 years of operation under intense pressures, they are now susceptible to a variety of stress-related defects, such as the corrosion that ate through six inches of steel and nearly produced a disaster at the Davis-Besse nuclear station in Ohio. As the recent Northeast blackout reminds us, our power system is a fragile and unpredictable creation - especially in an era of deregulation - and if these old reactors are allowed to remain in operation, the risks of catastrophe are simply unacceptable. -
Even in normal, safe" operations, every nuclear reactor produces between 20 and 30 tons of lethal, high-level radioactive waste every year - waste that will remain radioactive for tens of thousands of years. In addition, reactor facilities produce massive quantities of low-level waste - waste that isn't immediately lethal, but still poses substantial health and environment hazards. There is no known way to safely dispose of any of this waste. Even the controversial Yucca Mountain repository in Nevada isn't designed to accommodate the additional waste that would be generated by extending the life of current reactors by 20 years.
These plants need to be decommissioned as soon as possible.
thank you, Andrew Bema-Hicks Oakland, Califomia Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
