RA25-012, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:08, 20 May 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
ML25129A014
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/09/2025
From: Van Fleet J
Constellation Energy Generation
To:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Document Control Desk
References
RA25-012
Download: ML25129A014 (1)


Text

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 0 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 2024 Docket Number: 50-373/50-374 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 1 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS................................................................................ 3 2.0 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

............................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Summary of

Conclusions:

............................................................................................... 5

3.0 INTRODUCTION

........................................................................................................................ 6 4.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS..................................................................... 7 5.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS................ 8 6.0 MAPS OF COLLECTION SITES.............................................................................................. 14 7.0 REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES................................................................................................. 17 8.0 SAMPLING PROGRAM, PROGRAM MODIFICATION AND INTEPRETATION OF RESULTS................................................................................................................................ 18 8.1 Environmental Direct Radiation Dosimetry Results....................................................... 18 8.2 Air Particulate and Radioiodine Sample Results........................................................... 19 8.3 Waterborne Sample Results......................................................................................... 20 8.4 Ingestion Pathway Sample Results............................................................................... 21 9.0 LAND USE CENSUS............................................................................................................... 22 10.0 SAMPLE DEVIATIONS, ANOMALIES AND UNAVAILABILITY................................................ 23 11.0 OTHER SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION............................................................................. 25 11.1 NEI 07-07 Onsite Radiological Groundwater Monitoring Program................................. 25 11.2 Corrections to Previous Reports................................................................................... 26 12.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY...................................................................................................................... 27 TABLES Table 1: Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Direct Radiation......... 8 Table 2, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Airborne...................... 9 Table 3, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Waterborne............... 10 Table 4, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Ingestion................... 11 Table 5, REMP Sampling Locations - Direct Radiation........................................................................ 12 Table 6, Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples....................... 17 Table 7, Maximum Values for the Limit of Detection............................................................................ 17 Table 8: Land Use Census - Nearest Receptors within 5 miles........................................................... 23 Table 9: Sample Deviation Summary................................................................................................... 24 Table 10: LaSalle Data Summary Table.............................................................................................. 29 Table 11, Weekly Air Particulate Gross Beta (E-3 pCi/m3)................................................................... 34 Table 12: Quarterly Air Particulate Gamma Isotopic (E-3 pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma)...................................... 37 Table 13, Weekly Air Iodine I-131 (E-3 pCi/m3).................................................................................... 40 Table 14: Annual Food Products Gamma Isotopic (pCi/kg Wet +/- 2 Sigma).......................................... 43 Table 15: Monthly Vegetation Gamma Isotopic (pCi/Kg Wet +/- 2 Sigma).............................................. 45 Table 16, Monthly Surface Water Gross Beta (pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma).......................................................... 48 Table 17: Monthly Surface Water Gamma Isotopic (pCi/L+/- 2 Sigma ).................................................. 49 Table 18: Quarterly Surface Water Tritium (pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma).............................................................. 51

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 2 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 19, Quarterly Ground Water Tritium (pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma)............................................................... 52 Table 20: Quarterly Ground Water Gamma Isotopic (pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma)................................................ 53 Table 21: Semi-Annual Fish Gamma Isotopic (pCi/kg Wet +/- 2 Sigma)................................................. 54 Table 22: Semi-Annual Shoreline Sediment Gamma Isotopic (pCi/kg Dry +/- 2 Sigma)......................... 55 Table 23: Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program.............................................. 59 Table 24: DOEs Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)...................................... 61 Table 25: ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program..................................................... 63 Table 26, Quarterly DLR Results for LaSalle County Station, 2019...................................................... 68 Table 27, Quarterly DLR Results for LaSalle County Station, 2020...................................................... 69 Table 28, Quarterly DLR Results for LaSalle County Station, 2021...................................................... 70 Table 29, Summary and Conclusion, 2022.......................................................................................... 71 Table 30, Listing of Sample Anomalies, 2022...................................................................................... 72 Table 31, Quarterly DLR Results for LaSalle County Station, 2022...................................................... 73 Table 32, Summary and Conclusions, 2023......................................................................................... 74 FIGURES Figure 1, Potential exposure pathways to Members of the Public due to Plant Operations [6]............... 6 Figure 2, Inner Ring OSLD Locations of the LaSalle County Station, 2024.......................................... 14 Figure 3, Outer Ring OSLD Locations and Fixed Air Sampling Locations of the LaSalle County Station, 2024.................................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 4, Ingestion and Waterborne Exposure Pathway Sample Locations of the LaSalle County Station, 2024....................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 5, Air Particulate: Analysis for Gross Beta, Average for All Indicator vs. Control Location......... 19 Figure 6: Average Surface Water Tritium Results by Year................................................................... 20 ATTACHMENTS, Data Table Summary.................................................................................................... 29, Complete Data Table for All Analysis Results Obtained In 2024................................... 34, Cross Check Intercomparison Program......................................................................... 56, Environmental Direct Radiation Dosimetry Results....................................................... 65, Errata Data................................................................................................................... 68

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 3 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 1.0 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS

1.

Airborne Activity Sampling: Continuous sampling of air through the collection of particulates and radionuclides on filter media.

2.

ARERR: Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report

3.

AREOR: Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

4.

BWR: Boiling Water Reactor

5.

Composite Sample: A series of single collected portions (aliquots) analyzed as one sample. The aliquots making up the sample are collected at time intervals that are very short compared to the composite period.

6.

Control: A sampling station in a location not likely to be affected by plant effluents due to its distance and/or direction from the station.

7.

Curie (Ci): A measure of radioactivity; equal to 3.7 x 1010 disintegrations per second, or 2.22 x 1012 disintegrations per minute.

8.

Direct Radiation Monitoring: The measurement of radiation dose at various distances from the plant is assessed using Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLD), Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters (OSLD) and pressurized ionization chambers.

9.

EPA: Environmental Protection Agency

10.

GPI: Groundwater Protection Initiative

11.

Grab Sample: A single discrete sample drawn at one point in time.

12.

Indicator: A sampling location that is likely to be affected by plant effluents due to its proximity and/or direction from the plant.

13.

Ingestion Pathway: The ingestion pathway includes milk, fish, drinking water and garden produce. Also sampled (under special circumstances) are other media such as vegetation or animal products when additional information about particular radionuclides is needed.

14.

ISFSI: Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation

15.

Lower Limit of Detection (LLD): An a priori measure of the detection capability of a radiochemistry measurement based on instrument setup, calibration, background, decay time, and sample volume. An LLD is expressed as an activity concentration. The MDA is used for reporting results. LLD are specified by a regulator, such as the NRC and are typically listed in the ODCM.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 4 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

16.

MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity. For radiochemistry instruments, the MDA is the a posteriori minimum concentration that a counting system detects. The smallest concentration or activity of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above instrument background and that is detected with 95%

probability, with only five % probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a true signal.

17.

MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration. Essentially synonymous with MDA for the purposes of radiological monitoring.

18.

Mean: The sum of all of the values in a distribution divided by the number of values in the distribution, synonymous with average.

19.

Microcurie: 3.7 x 104 disintegrations per second, or 2.22 x106 disintegrations per minute.

20.

N/A: Not Applicable

21.

NEI: Nuclear Energy Institute

22.

NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

23.

NRC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission

24.

ODCM: Offsite Dose Calculation Manual

25.

OSLD: Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter

26.

pCi/L: picocuries / Liter

27.

PWR: Pressurized Water Reactor

28.

REMP: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program

29.

TLD: Thermoluminescent Dosimeter 2.0 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) was established prior to the station becoming operational to provide information on background radiation present in the area. The goal of LaSalle Station REMP is to evaluate the impact of the station on the environment. Environmental samples from different media are monitored as part of the program in accordance with specifications detailed in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). The program compares data from Indicator locations near the plant, to Control locations farther away from the site to assess operation impacts.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 5 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR) provides data obtained through analyses of environmental samples collected at LaSalle Station for the reporting period of January 1st through December 31st, 2024. During that time period 1,295 analyses were performed on 1,219 samples. In assessing all the data gathered for this report and comparing these results with preoperational data and/or 10-year average values, it was concluded that the operation of LaSalle Station had no adverse radiological impact on the environment.

2.1 Summary of

Conclusions:

In 2024, the LaSalle Generating Station released to the environment through the radioactive effluent gaseous pathways 641 curies of noble gas, fission, and activation products and 70 curies of tritium. There were no liquid effluent releases beyond the site in 2024. The resultant calculated doses due to gaseous radioactive effluents from LaSalle Station were well below regulatory limits of 40 CFR 190 and summarized below.

Whole Body Thyroid Max Other Organ Gaseous1,2 1.39E-02 3.55E-02 4.71E-02 Liquid 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Sky Shine & ISFSI 7.49E-01 7.49E-01 7.49E-01 Total Site Dose 7.63E-01 7.84E-01 7.96E-01 Total w/Other Nearby Facility3 7.63E-01 7.84E-01 7.96E-01 Limit 25 mrem 75 mrem 25 mrem

% of Limit 3.05E+00 1.05E+00 3.18E+00 1 Gaseous dose values include organ dose from Noble Gas, Iodine, Tritium, Carbon-14, and particulates with half-lives > 8 days.

2 Individual groups with the highest dose are used: Total Body: all age groups for Noble Gas and the Infant and Child for particulates, Individual age group sum is lower.

3 Other fuel cycle sources within 5 miles of the site do not exist.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 6 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

3.0 INTRODUCTION

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) provides data on measurable levels of radiation and radioactive materials in the environment. This program also evaluates the relationship between quantities of radioactive materials released from the plant and resultant doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure. In this capacity, REMP provides a check on the effluent release program and dispersion modeling to ensure that concentrations in the environment due to radioactive effluents conform to the As Low as Is Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) design objectives of 10 CFR 50, Appendix I [1], and implements the requirements of Section IV.B.2 and IV.B.3 of Appendix I. REMP is designed to conform to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Regulatory Guide 4.1 [2], NUREG 1301/1302

[3] [4], and the 1979 NRC Branch Technical Position [5].

Figure 1, Potential exposure pathways to Members of the Public due to Plant Operations [6]

Quality assurance aspects of the sampling program and TLD/OSLD data collection are conducted in accordance with Regulatory Guides 4.15 [7] and 4.13 [8]. REMP also adheres to the requirements of Illinois, LaSalle Station Technical Specifications, and Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). These governing documents dictate the environmental sampling, sample analysis protocols, data reporting and quality assurance requirements for the environmental monitoring program.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 7 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides summaries of the environmental data from exposure pathways, interpretations of the data, and analyses of trends of the results. Routinely monitored pathways include ingestion, inhalation, and direct radiation. Routes of exposure are based on site specific information such as meteorology, receptor locations, and water usage around the plant.

4.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 consists of two boiling water reactors, each rated for 3,546 MWt. Both units are owned and operated by Constellation Energy and are located in LaSalle County, Illinois. Unit 1 went critical on 16 March 1982.

Unit 2 went critical on 02 December 1983. The site is located in northern Illinois, approximately 75 miles southwest of Chicago, Illinois.

LaSalle Station sampling media are selected based on site specific information such as meteorology, receptor locations, and water usage around the plant. Sampling and analysis frequencies are documented in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and site procedures. Required sampling, analysis frequencies and location of sample collected are captured in the following tables and figures:

Table 1: Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway -

Direct Radiation Table 2, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway -

Airborne Table 3, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway -

Waterborne Table 4, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway -

Ingestion Table 5, REMP Sampling Locations - Direct Radiation Figure 2, Inner Ring OSLD Locations of the LaSalle County Station, 2024 Figure 3, Outer Ring OSLD Locations and Fixed Air Sampling Locations of the LaSalle County Station, 2024 Figure 4, Ingestion and Waterborne Exposure Pathway Sample Locations of the LaSalle County Station, 2024

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 8 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 5.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS Table 1: Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Direct Radiation Requirement Sample Location Description, Distance, and Direction Sampling Collection/

Frequency Type and Frequency of Analyses Direct Radiation 42 OSLD monitoring stations with two dosimeters placed as follows:

An inner ring consisting of 16 locations, near and within the site perimeter representing fence post doses.

An outer ring of stations consisting of 17 locations, extending to approximately 5 miles from the site designated to measure possible exposure to nearby populations.

An other set consisting of 8 locations A control/special interest location See Table 5 Quarterly Gamma dose Quarterly

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 9 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 2, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Airborne Requirement Sample Location Description, Distance, and Direction Sampling Collection/

Frequency Type and Frequency of Analyses Airborne Radioiodine and Particulates Samples from 9 locations:

Four locations close to the site boundary in different sectors of the highest calculated annual average ground level D/Q.

Four samples from the vicinity of a community having the highest calculated annual average D/Q.

One samples from Control Locations between 6.2 -

18.6 miles away in the least predominant wind direction.

L-01 Nearsite 1, 1.5 miles NNW L-03 Onsite 3, 1.0 miles ENE L-04 Rte. 170, 3.2 miles E L-05 Onsite 5, 0.3 miles ESE L-06 Nearsite 6, 0.4 miles W L-07 Seneca, 5.2 miles NNE L-08 Marseilles, 6.0 miles NNW L-10 Streator (C), 13.5 miles SW L-11A Ransom, 6.0 miles S One-week of continuous air sampling through glass fiber filter paper Weekly composite of continuous air sampling through charcoal filter Particulate sampler: Gross Beta analysis following weekly filter change and Gamma isotopic quarterly on composite filters by location on near field and control samples.

Radioiodine canister: I-131 analysis weekly on near field and control samples.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 10 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 3, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Waterborne Requirement Sample Location Description, Distance, and Direction Sampling Collection/

Frequency Type and Frequency of Analyses Surface Water One sample upstream (control) and one sample downstream (indicator)

L-21 Illinois River at Seneca, Upstream (C),

4.0 miles NE L-40 Illinois River, Downstream (I), 5.2 miles NNW Monthly and quarterly composite from weekly grab samples Gamma isotopic Monthly Gross beta Monthly H-3 Quarterly Groundwater/Well Water Two control location upgradient from the plant and Two indicator locations down gradient from the plant, only if likely to be affected.

L-27 LSCS Onsite Well (I), 0 miles at station L-28-W4 Marseilles Well (C), 7.0 miles NNW L-28-W5 Marseilles Well (C), 6.7 miles NNW L-28-W6 Marseilles Well (I), 4.1 miles N Quarterly grab samples Gamma isotopic Quarterly H-3 Quarterly Sediment from Shoreline One sample upstream (control) and two of samples downstream (indicator)

L-21 Illinois River at Seneca, Upstream (C),

4.0 miles NE L-40 Illinois River, Downstream (I), 5.2 miles NNW L-41 Illinois River, Downstream (I), 4.6 miles N

Semi-annual grab samples Gamma isotopic Semiannually

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 11 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 4, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Ingestion Requirement Sample Location Description, Distance, and Direction Sampling Collection/

Frequency Type and Frequency of Analyses Fish One sample upstream (control) and two samples downstream (indicator) of each commercially and recreationally important species in vicinity of site discharge.

L-34 LaSalle Cooling Lake (I), 2.0 miles E L-35 Marseilles Pool of Illinois River, Downstream (I), 6.5 miles NNW L-36 Illinois River, Upstream of Discharge (C), 4.3 miles NE Semi-annual samples collected via electroshocking or other techniques Gamma isotopic analysis on edible portions Food products/Vegetation Five samples of food products from any area that is irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes have been discharged.

Three broad leaf vegetation grown nearest each of two different offsite locations of highest predicated annual average ground level D/Q if milk sampling is not performed and one sample collected from the control location.

Quadrant 1 171 Valley View, Seneca IL, 5.2 miles NE Quadrant 2 106 W. Thomas, Ransom, IL, 6.0 miles S

Quadrant 3 2260 N 21st Road, Marseilles IL, 3.2 miles WSW Quadrant 4 2507 N. 2553 Rd., Marseilles IL, 4.3 miles NNW Control Biros Farm, 14.2 miles E L-CONTROL, 9.5 miles ENE L-ESE 1,1.5 miles ESE L-ESE 2,6.0 miles ESE Annual grab samples Monthly grab samples during growing season Gamma isotopic on each sample

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 12 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 5, REMP Sampling Locations - Direct Radiation Site #

Location Type Sector Distance Description L-101-1 and -2 Inner Ring N

0.5 miles L-102-1 and -2 Inner Ring NNE 0.6 miles L-103-1 and -2 Inner Ring NE 0.7 miles L-104-1 and -2 Inner Ring ENE 0.8 miles L-105-1 and -2 Inner Ring E

0.7 miles L-106-1 and -2 Inner Ring ESE 1.4 miles L-107-1 and -2 Inner Ring SE 0.8 miles L-108-1 and -2 Inner Ring SSE 0.5 miles L-109-1 and -2 Inner Ring S

0.6 miles L-110-1 and -2 Inner Ring SSW 0.6 miles L-111b-1 and -2 Inner Ring SW 0.8 miles L-112-1 and -2 Inner Ring WSW 0.9 miles L-113a-1 and -2 Inner Ring W

0.8 miles L-114-1 and -2 Inner Ring WNW 0.9 miles L-115-1 and -2 Inner Ring NW 0.7 miles L-116-1 and -2 Inner Ring NNW 0.6 miles L-201-3 and -4 Outer Ring N

4.0 miles L-202-3 and -4 Outer Ring NNE 3.6 miles L-203-1 and -2 Outer Ring NE 4.0 miles L-204-1 and -2 Outer Ring ENE 3.2 miles L-205A-1 and -2 Outer Ring ESE 3.2 miles

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 13 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 5, REMP Sampling Locations - Direct Radiation Site #

Location Type Sector Distance Description L-205B-3 and -4 Outer Ring E

5.1 miles L-206-1 and -2 Outer Ring SE 4.3 miles L-207-1 and -2 Outer Ring SSE 4.5 miles L-208-1 and -2 Outer Ring S

4.5 miles L-209-1 and -2 Outer Ring SSW 4.0 miles L-210-1 and -2 Outer Ring SW 3.3 miles L-211-1 and -2 Outer Ring WSW 4.5 miles L-212-1 and -2 Outer Ring W

4.0 miles L-213-3 and -4 Outer Ring W

4.9 miles L-214-3 and -4 Outer Ring WNW 5.1 miles L-215-3 and -4 Outer Ring NW 5.0 miles L-216-3 and -4 Outer Ring NNW 5.0 miles L-01-1 and -2 Other NNW 1.5 miles Nearsite 1 (indicator)

L-03-1 and -2 Other ENE 1.0 miles Onsite 3 (indicator)

L-04-1 and -2 Other E

3.2 miles Rte. 170 (indicator)

L-05-1 and -2 Other ESE 0.3 miles Onsite 5 (indicator)

L-06-1 and -2 Other W

0.4 miles Nearsite 6 (indicator)

L-07-1 and -2 Other NNE 5.2 miles Seneca (indicator)

L-08-1 and -2 Other NNW 6.0 miles Marseilles (indicator)

L-11A-1 and -2 Other S

6.0 miles Ransom (indicator)

L-10-1 and -2 Control/

Special Interest SW 13.5 miles Streator

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 14 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 6.0 MAPS OF COLLECTION SITES Figure 2, Inner Ring OSLD Locations of the LaSalle County Station, 2024

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 15 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Figure 3, Outer Ring OSLD Locations and Fixed Air Sampling Locations of the LaSalle County Station, 2024

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 16 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Figure 4, Ingestion and Waterborne Exposure Pathway Sample Locations of the LaSalle County Station, 2024

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 17 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 7.0 REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES Table 6, Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples Radionuclide Water (pCi/L)

Air Particulates or Gases (pCi/m3)

Fish (pCi/kg-wet)

Milk (pCi/L)

Food Products (pCi/kg-wet)

H-3 20,000 (1)

NA NA NA NA Mn-54 1,000 NA 30,000 NA NA Fe-59 400 NA 10,000 NA NA Co-58 1,000 NA 30,000 NA NA Co-60 300 NA 10,000 NA NA Zn-65 300 NA 20,000 NA NA Zr-Nb-95 400 NA NA NA NA I-131 2 (2) 0.9 NA 3

100 Cs-134 30 10 1,000 60 1,000 Cs-137 50 20 2,000 70 2,000 Ba-La-140 200 NA NA 300 NA Table 7, Maximum Values for the Limit of Detection Radionuclide Water (pCi/L)

Air Particulates or Gases (pCi/m3)

Fish (pCi/kg-wet)

Milk (pCi/L)

Food Products (pCi/kg-wet)

Sediment (pCi/kg-dry)

H-3 2,000 NA NA NA NA NA Mn-54 15 NA 130 NA NA NA Fe-59 30 NA 260 NA NA NA Co-58, Co-60 15 NA 130 NA NA NA Zn-65 30 NA 260 NA NA NA Zr-Nb-95 15 NA NA NA NA NA I-131 1

0.07 NA 1

60 NA Cs-134 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 Ba-La-140 15 NA NA 15 NA NA 1 For drinking water samples, this is a 40 CFR Part 141 value. If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 30,000 pCi/l may be used.

2 If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 20 pCi/l may be used

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 18 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 8.0 SAMPLING PROGRAM, PROGRAM MODIFICATION AND INTEPRETATION OF RESULTS At most nuclear stations, data was collected prior to plant operation to determine background radioactivity levels in the environment. Annual data is routinely compared to preoperational and/or 10-year average values to determine if changes in the environs are present. Strict comparison is difficult to make due to fallout from historical nuclear weapon testing. Cesium-137 can be routinely found in environmental samples as a results of above ground nuclear weapons testing. It is important to note, levels of Cs-137 in environment are observed to fluctuate, for example as silt distributions shift due to natural erosion and transport processes, Cs-137 may or may not be observed in sediment samples. Results from samples collected and analyzed during the year, 2024, are described below.

In the following sections, results from direct radiation, air, water, and food products analyzed as part of REMP in 2024 will be discussed. Sampling program descriptions and deviations will also be discussed.

8.1 Environmental Direct Radiation Dosimetry Results Dose is measured as net exposure (field reading less transit reading) normalized to 91-day quarters. Data is treated and analyzed consistent with ANSI/HPS N13.37-2014, which compares the measured dose for each location to the baseline background dose for that location. Environmental dose rates vary by location, depending on geological and land use considerations, and remain relatively constant for any given location (unless land use changes). Some facilities observe seasonal variation in environmental doses. Baseline Background Doses have been determined for both quarterly and annual measurements at each location using historical field measurements.

ANSI/HPS N13.37-2014 uses the concept of minimum differential dose (MDD), which is the minimum facility-related dose that can be detected above background. Due to natural background variations and measurement sensitivities and uncertainties, minimum differential dose is not zero. MDD is calculated based on statistical performance of the dosimetry system in the environment and is site specific.

Normalized doses that exceed the Minimum Differential Dose value above the Baseline Background Dose are considered to indicate Facility-Related Dose; a quality assurance review is performed to verify that any results indicating Facility-Related Dose are accurate.

During the calendar year 2024, a total of 42 locations were monitored and data., Environmental Direct Radiation Dosimetry Results, provides the annual direct radiation dosimetry analysis.

There was no direct radiation dose detected from the facility. All OSLD measurements were analyzed, and none were found to have radiation levels that had increased over normal background radiation levels.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 19 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 8.2 Air Particulate and Radioiodine Sample Results Air particulate filters and charcoal canisters were collected from locations specified in.

During the calendar year 2024, a total of 457 samples were collected and analyzed for gross beta, gamma emitters and iodine. Particulate samplers are used to continuously collect airborne particulates on a filter. The samples are analyzed for gross beta activity following filter changeout which occurs weekly. Gamma isotopic analysis is also performed on the samples collected at each location and is analyzed quarterly. Radioiodine (I-131) analysis is performed weekly on radioiodine sample cartridges.

All gross beta analyses of air particulate filters detected gross beta activity at levels consistent with previous years. All air particulate quarterly gamma composite samples were below the detection limit except for naturally occurring radionuclides.

Figure 5, Air Particulate: Analysis for Gross Beta, Average for All Indicator vs. Control Location 0

5 10 15 20 25 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 E-3 pCi/cu.m Year Air Particulate: Analysis for Gross Beta, Indicator vs.

Control Indicator Control

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 20 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Air particulate and radioiodine results from this monitoring period, 2024, were compared to 10-year average as shown in Figure 5, and there were no significant changes.

8.3 Waterborne Sample Results 8.3.1 Surface Water Composite water samples are collected monthly at the upstream control location and at the downstream indicator locations. Monthly composite samples are analyzed for gamma emitters. Aliquots from the monthly composites are combined to form a quarterly composite which is then analyzed for tritium. During the calendar year 2024, a total of 32 surface water samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the requirements in the ODCM and shown in Table 3, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Waterborne. Gross Beta was detected in 24 of the 24 samples with a range of 4 to 13 pCi/L. The required LLD for Gross Beta was met for all samples. Samples from both locations were analyzed for gamma-emitting nuclides. No nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met. Tritium was detected in 5 of the 8 samples with a range of 198 to 430 pCi/L.

Concentrations detected were consistent with those detected in previous years.

Tritium concentrations in surface water were well below the EPA tritium drinking water limit of 20,000 pCi/L.

Figure 6: Average Surface Water Tritium Results by Year 0

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 pCi/L Year Surface Water: Analysis for Tritium, Indicator vs.

Control Indicator Control

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 21 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 8.3.2 REMP Groundwater Groundwater samples were collected from control location upgradient from the plant and indicator location down gradient from the plant. During the calendar year 2024, a total of 12 groundwater water samples were collected from offsite monitoring wells and analyzed in accordance with the requirements in the ODCM and shown in Table 3: Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Waterborne.

A total of 2 control sample locations and a total of 2 indicator sample locations were collected. These samples were analyzed for tritium and gamma quarterly. All groundwater samples were collected in new containers, which were rinsed with source water prior to collection.

Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma-emitting nuclides. No nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met. Tritium concentrations in groundwater were well below the EPA tritium drinking water limit of 20,000 pCi/L. There has been no detectable tritium in any REMP groundwater samples in 2024 or the previous 10 years. Therefore, no trend has been established above the detection limit to plot on a trending graph.

8.3.3 Sediment from Shoreline Shoreline sediment collections were made in May through October of 2024 and analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes. Samples are collected at both indicator and control locations. A total of 6 shoreline samples were analyzed in accordance with requirements in the ODCM and shown in Table 3, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Waterborne.

No nuclides potentially associated with LaSalle Station were detected and all required LLDs were met.

8.4 Ingestion Pathway Sample Results 8.4.1 Fish A total of 12 fish samples were collected in 2024. These samples were analyzed for gamma-emitting radionuclides in edible portions, in accordance with requirements of the ODCM and summarized in Table 4, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Ingestion. These samples are collected from the indicator and control areas as required by the ODCM.

Naturally occurring potassium-40 was identified in all fish samples with concentrations consistent with previous years.

8.4.2 Food Products A total of 18 food product type samples were analyzed in 2024, for gamma emitting radionuclides in accordance with requirements of the ODCM, as summarized in Table 4, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Ingestion.

No nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 22 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 8.4.3 Vegetation In accordance with the ODCM and as described in Table 4, Radiological Environmental Sampling Program - Exposure Pathway - Ingestion, 57 vegetation samples were collected from growing locations nearest site boundary in areas of highest predicted annual average ground level D/Q. Samples are collected and analyzed for gamma isotopic from the indicator and control locations monthly during growing season.

No nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met.

9.0 LAND USE CENSUS An annual land use census is required by the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and is performed to ensure that changes in the use of areas at or beyond the site boundary are identified and modifications to REMP are made if required by changes in land use. The land use census satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50 [1]. NUREG-1301/1302 Control 3.12.2 specifies that "a Land Use Census shall be conducted and shall identify within a distance of 8 km (5 mi.) the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden of greater than 50 m2 (500 ft2) producing broad leaf vegetation. Note, per NUREG-1301/1302, Broad leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be performed at the SITE BOUNDARY in each of two different direction sectors with the highest predicted D/Qs in lieu of the garden census.

A Land Use Census was conducted during the calendar year, 2024, within the growing season to identify changes in land use, receptor locations, and new exposure pathways. The results for the 2024 Land Use Census are listed in Table 8: Land Use Census - Nearest Receptors within 5 miles. In summary, the highest D/Q locations for nearest livestock, nearest residence and nearest milk animal did not change following the 2024 census.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 23 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 8: Land Use Census - Nearest Receptors within 5 miles Sector Direction Residence Distance (Miles)

Milk Farm Distance (Miles)

Livestock Distance (Miles)

A N

3.9 4.0 B

NNE 1.6 1.7 C

NE 2.1 3.5 D

ENE 3.3 3.8 E

E 3.2 14.2 F

ESE 1.4 G

SE 1.7 5.1 H

SSE 1.8 4.7 J

S 1.5 1.5 K

SSW 0.7 L

SW 1.0 5.8 M

WSW 1.5 N

W 1.7 3.0 P

WNW 0.9 3.0 Q

NW 1.7 3.3 R

NNW 1.7 4.5 10.0 SAMPLE DEVIATIONS, ANOMALIES AND UNAVAILABILITY Sampling and analysis are performed for media types addressed in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. Sampling and analysis challenges may be experienced due to a multitude of reasons including environmental factors, loss of TLDs/OSLDs, contamination of samples, etc. To aid classification of sampling and analysis challenges experienced in 2024, the following three terms are used to describe the issues: Sample Anomalies, Sample Deviation, and Unavailable Samples.

Media that experienced downtime (i.e., air samplers or water samplers) during a surveillance period are classified a Sample Deviation. Sample Anomalies are defined as errors that were introduced to a sample once it arrived in the laboratory, errors that prevents the sample from being analyzed as it normally would, or may have altered the outcome of the analysis (i.e., cross contamination, human error).

Sample Unavailability is defined as sample collection with no available sample (i.e.,

food crop, TLD).

All required samples were collected and analyzed as scheduled except for the following:

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 24 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 9: Sample Deviation Summary Sample Type Location Collection Date or Period Reason for not conducting REMP sampling as required by ODCM Plans for preventing reoccurrence AP/AI L-04 1/18/24 The timer indicates approximately 63 hours7.291667e-4 days <br />0.0175 hours <br />1.041667e-4 weeks <br />2.39715e-5 months <br /> less than expected due to a power outage. During the next collection period (1/25), the timer indicated an expected reading of 167.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> AP/AI L-06 2/15/24 Pump was found not running with the timer indicating 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> less than expected due to a power outage. The flow rate was estimated.

The power restored within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and the time indicated an expected reading of 166.4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.

The power company was notified.

AP/AI L-01 4/25/24 The sample was marked as a missed sample.

Pump found flipped on its side and broken due to very strong winds The pump was replaced.

AP/AI L-06 5/9/24 The pump stopped running after 137.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> due to a blown fuse The fuse was replaced.

AP/AI L-03 8/7/24 The sample was marked as a missed sample.

No power at the station due to transformer issue.

AP/AI L-03 8/15/24 The sample was marked as a missed sample.

No power at the station due to transformer issue.

AP/AI L-03 8/22/24 The sample was marked as a missed sample.

No power at the station due to transformer issue.

AP/AI L-03 8/29/24 The sample was marked as a missed sample.

No power at the station due to transformer issue.

AP/AI L-03 9/4/24 The sample was marked as a missed sample.

No power at the station due to transformer issue.

AP/AI L-03 9/13/24 The sample was marked as a missed sample.

No power at the station due to transformer issue.

AP/AI All locations 9/13/24 The sampling period was extended to 9 days due to collectors hospital stay AP/AI L-03 9/19/24 The sample was marked as a missed sample.

No power at the station due to transformer issue.

AP/AI L-03 9/26/24 The sample was marked as a missed sample.

No power at the station due to transformer issue.

AP/AI L-03 10/2/24 The sample was marked as a missed sample.

No power at the station due to transformer issue.

AP/AI L-03 10/9/24 The sample was marked as a missed sample.

No power at the station due to transformer issue.

Transformer issue was resolved following repair of the splitter box.

AP/AI All locations 12/31/24 The sampling period was shortened to 5 days due to the holidays SW L-21 and L-40 9/13/24 The sampling period was extended to 9 days due to collectors unavailability

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 25 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 9: Sample Deviation Summary Contd Sample Type Location Collection Date or Period Reason for not conducting REMP sampling as required by ODCM Plans for preventing reoccurrence Milk L-42 6/1/24 Control dairy farm no longer available. Farmer sold all their cows except 1 and can no longer participate in the program. There is no indicator location based on the land use census.

OSLD L-208-2 2nd Quarter 2024 OSLD was found missing. It was possible that it was due to theft. The premise was searched and was unsuccessful in locating the OSLD OSLD L-06-1 3rd Quarter 2024 OSLD was found missing. It was possibly due to strong winds. The premise was searched and was unsuccessful in locating the OSLD 11.0 OTHER SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 11.1 NEI 07-07 Onsite Radiological Groundwater Monitoring Program LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 has developed a Groundwater Protection Initiative (GPI) program in accordance with NEI 07-07, Industry Ground Water Protection Initiative - Final Guidance Document. The purpose of the GPI is to ensure timely detection and an effective response to situations involving inadvertent radiological releases to groundwater in order to prevent migration of licensed radioactive material off-site and to quantify impacts on decommissioning. It is important to note, samples and results taken in support of NEI 07-07 on-site groundwater monitoring program are separate from the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP). Results of the NEI 07-07 Radiological Groundwater Monitoring Program for onsite groundwater wells are provided in the ARERR.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 26 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 11.2 Corrections to Previous Reports A fleet gap was identified for determining baseline data for environmental dosimetry under AR 04736650. Due to this gap identification, corrections were made to LaSalles environmental dosimetry baseline and data for years 2019 through 2022.

2019: In Appendix C. Table C-IX.1 Quarterly DLR Results, the baseline MDDQ and MDDA values were found to be elevated. The baseline data was corrected. The quarterly and annual data was also corrected for errors with control data under AR 04749521.

2020: In Appendix C. Table C-IX.1 Quarterly DLR Results, the baseline MDDQ and MDDA values were found to be elevated. New baseline data was developed due to a step change in the data from years 2020 to the current. The quarterly and annual data was also adjusted for errors with control data under ARs 04747903 and 04749521.

2021: In Appendix C. Table C-IX.1 Quarterly DLR Results, the baseline MDDQ and MDDA values were found to be elevated. The baseline data was corrected under AR 04749521.

2022:

1) In section I. Summary and Conclusions table, the whole-body total site dose was reported as 8.05E+01 mrem. The correct result was 8.05E-01 mrem under AR 04837825.
2) In section D. Table D-1 Table of Sample Anomalies, AP/AI L-04 03/24/22 had incorrect timer reading of 1441.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. The correct reading was 141.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> under AR 04837825.
3). In Appendix C. Table C-IX.1 Quarterly DLR Results, the baseline MDDQ and MDDA values were found to be elevated. The baseline data was corrected under AR 04749521.

2023: In section I. Summary and Conclusions table, the percent of limit for Thyroid dose was reported as 7.60E-01. The correct result was 7.60E-02 mrem under AR 04837825., Errata Data, provides the tables where the corrections were made.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 27 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 12.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] "10 CFR 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities"," US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.

[2] "Regulatory Guide 4.1, "Radiological Environmental Monitoring for Nuclear Power Plants",

Revision 2," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2009.

[3] "NUREG-1301, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Pressurized Water Reactors,.," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, April 1991.

[4] "NUREG-1302, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Boiling Water Reactors,," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, April 1991.

[5] "Branch Technical Position, Revision 1," NRC000096, Submitted March 30, 2012, November 1979.

[6] "Japan Atomic Energy Agency," 06 November 2020. [Online]. Available:

https://www.jaea.go.jp/english/04/ntokai/houkan/houkan_02.html.

[7] "Regulatory Guide 4.15, Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs (Inception through Normal Operations to License Termination) -- Effluent Streams and the Environment,"

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, July, 2007.

[8] "Regulatory Guide 4.13, Performance, Testing, and Procedural Specifications for Thermoluminescence Dosimetry: Environmental Applications, Revision 2," Nuclear Regulatory Commision, June, 2019.

[9] "NUREG/CR-2919, XOQDOQ Computer Program for the Meteorological Evaluation of Routine Effluent Releases at Nuclear Power Stations,," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, September, 1982.

[10] "Measurements of Radionuclides in the environment Sampling and Analysis of plutonium in soil,"

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1974.

[11] "Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States," Bethesda, MD, 2009.

[12] Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 30 June 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/students/animated-pwr.html. [Accessed October 2020].

[13] "ICRP Publication 60, ICRP Publication 60: 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, 60, Annals of the ICRP Volume 21/1-3,," International Commission on Radiation Protection, October, 1991.

[14] "NRC Resource Page," [Online]. Available: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/radiation.html. [Accessed 10 November 2020].

[15] "NUREG-0133, Preparation of Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants,"

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1987.

[16] "Regulatory Guide 1.109, Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Demonstrating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I,,"

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Ocotober, 1977.

[17] [Online]. Available: http://hps.org/hpspublications/radiationfactsheets.html. [Accessed 2020].

[18] "NEI 07-07, Industry Ground Water Protection InitiativeFinal Guidance Document,," Nuclear Energy Institute, Washington, D.C..

[19] "ANSI 13.37, Environmental Dosimetry-Criteria for System Design and Implementation," Health Physics Society (HPS), May, 2019.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 28 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

[20] "40 CFR Part 141, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations,," US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC..

[21] Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 25 June 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/students/animated-bwr.html. [Accessed October 2020].

[22] NCRP, "Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States,"

National Council on Radiation Protection, Bethesda, 2009.

[23] "40 CFR 190 - Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operation," US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

[24] "NUREG-0324 - XOQDOQ, Program for the Meteorological Evaluation of Routine Effluent Releases at Nuclear Power Stations," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, September, 1977.

[25] "NCRP Report No. 160 - Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States,"

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, 2009.

[26] "10 CFR 20 - Standards for Protection Against Radiation," US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 29 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

, Data Table Summary Table 10: LaSalle Data Summary Table Medium or Pathway Sampled (Units)

Type, Total Number of Analyses performed (e.g., I-131, 400)

Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)

Indicator Mean8; (f9).

Range8 Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Mean8 (f9).

Range8 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements Name Distance and Direction Mean8 (f9)

Range8 Air Particulates (pCi/m3)

Gross Beta, 457 0.01 18.7 L-10 19.8 19.8 0

(405/405)

Streator (52/52)

(52/52)

(8.2/39.2) 13.5 miles SW (10.5/36.6)

(10.5/36.6)

Gamma, 36 Mn-54 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-58 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Fe-59 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-60 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zn-65 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Nb-95 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zr-95 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

I-131 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-134 0.05

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-137 0.06

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Ba-140 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

La-140 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Airborne Radioiodine (pCi/m3)

Gamma, 457 I-131 0.07

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Direct Radiation (mrem/qtr.)

Gamma Dose, 168 N/A 18.9 (164/164)

L-102 21.2 (4/4) 16.3 (4/4) 0 (15.4/23.5) 0.6 miles NNE (18.7/23.5)

(14.9/17.4) 8 Mean and range are based on detectable measurements only.

9 Fraction are based on detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 30 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

, Data Table Summary Table 10: LaSalle Data Summary Table Medium or Pathway Sampled (Units)

Type, Total Number of Analyses performed (e.g., I-131, 400)

Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)

Indicator Mean8; (f9).

Range8 Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Mean8 (f9).

Range8 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements Name Distance and Direction Mean8 (f9)

Range8 Food Products (pCi/kg-wet)

Gamma, 18 Mn-54 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-58 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Fe-59 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-60 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zn-65 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Nb-95 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zr-95 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

I-131 60

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-134 60

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-137 80

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Ba-140 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

La-140 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Vegetation (pCi/Kg-wet)

Gamma, 57 Mn-54 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-58 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Fe-59 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-60 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zn-65 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Nb-95 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zr-95 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

I-131 60

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-134 60

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-137 80

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Ba-140 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

La-140 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

8 Mean and range are based on detectable measurements only.

9 Fraction are based on detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 31 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

, Data Table Summary Table 10: LaSalle Data Summary Table 8 Mean and range are based on detectable measurements only.

9 Fraction are based on detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses Medium or Pathway Sampled (Units)

Type, Total Number of Analyses performed (e.g., I-131, 400)

Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)

Indicator Mean8; (f9).

Range8 Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Mean8 (f9).

Range8 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements Name Distance and Direction Mean8 (f9)

Range8 Surface Water (pCi/lL)

Gross Beta, 24 4

7.7 L-21 8.2 8.2 0

(12/12)

Illinois River at Seneca -

Upstream (12/12)

(12/12)

(4.7/11.6) 4.0 miles NE (4.4/12.5)

(4.4/12.5)

H-3, 12 200 394 L-40 394 338 0

(6/8)

Illinois River Downstream (6/8)

(7/8)

(360/430) 5.2 miles NNW (360/430)

(198/395)

Gamma, 24 Mn-54 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-58 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Fe-59 30

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-60 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zn-65 30

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Nb-95 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zr-95 30

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

I-131 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-134 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-137 18

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Ba-140 60

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

La-140 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 32 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

, Data Table Summary Table 10: LaSalle Data Summary Table 8 Mean and range are based on detectable measurements only.

9 Fraction are based on detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses Medium or Pathway Sampled (Units)

Type, Total Number of Analyses performed (e.g., I-131, 400)

Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)

Indicator Mean8; (f9).

Range8 Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Mean8 (f9).

Range8 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements Name Distance and Direction Mean8 (f9)

Range8 Ground Water (pCi/lL)

H-3, 12 200

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 0

Gamma, 12 Mn-54 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-58 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Fe-59 30

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-60 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zn-65 30

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Nb-95 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zr-95 30

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

I-131 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-134 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-137 18

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Ba-140 60

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

La-140 15

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 33 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

, Data Table Summary Table 10: LaSalle Data Summary Table Medium or Pathway Sampled (Units)

Type, Total Number of Analyses performed (e.g., I-131, 400)

Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)

Indicator Mean8; (f9).

Range8 Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Mean8 (f9).

Range8 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements Name Distance and Direction Mean8 (f9)

Range8 Fish (pCi/kg Wet)

Gamma, 12 Mn-54 130

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-58 130

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Fe-59 260

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-60 130

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zn-65 260

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Nb-95 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zr-95 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-134 130

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-137 150

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Ba-140 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

La-140 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Sediment (pCi/kg Dry)

Gamma, 6 Mn-54 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-58 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Fe-59 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Co-60 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zn-65 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Nb-95 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Zr-95 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-134 150

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-137 180

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Ba-140 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

La-140 N/A

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

8 Mean and range are based on detectable measurements only.

9 Fraction are based on detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 34 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

, Complete Data Table for All Analysis Results Obtained In 2024 Note: Throughout Attachment 2, bold data entries are for the reported concentration Table 11, Weekly Air Particulate Gross Beta (E-3 pCi/m3)

Collection Date L-03 L-05 L-01 L-06 L-04 L-07 L-08 L-11A L-10 01/04/2024 18

+/-

5 19

+/-

5 26

+/-

5 18

+/-

5 22

+/-

5 21

+/-

5 18

+/-

5 18

+/-

5 20

+/-

5 01/10/2024 30

+/-

5 23

+/-

4 25

+/-

5 23

+/-

4 31

+/-

6 24

+/-

4 24

+/-

4 23

+/-

4 27

+/-

4 01/18/2024 18

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 22

+/-

4 01/25/2024 13

+/-

5 15

+/-

5 12

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 13

+/-

5 14

+/-

5 12

+/-

5 10

+/-

4 12

+/-

5 01/31/2024 13

+/-

4 11

+/-

4 12

+/-

4 9

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 11

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 02/07/2024 15

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 02/15/2024 22

+/-

4 29

+/-

5 24

+/-

5 23

+/-

5 23

+/-

4 20

+/-

4 20

+/-

4 23

+/-

5 20

+/-

4 02/22/2024 21

+/-

5 24

+/-

5 19

+/-

5 19

+/-

5 22

+/-

5 25

+/-

5 20

+/-

5 16

+/-

5 21

+/-

5 02/28/2024 13

+/-

4 12

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 14

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 18

+/-

5 14

+/-

4 03/06/2024 18

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 20

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 20

+/-

4 03/14/2024 15

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 13

+/-

3 15

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 03/21/2024 12

+/-

4 17

+/-

5 13

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 19

+/-

5 12

+/-

4 12

+/-

4 11

+/-

4 03/27/2024 13

+/-

3 10

+/-

3 11

+/-

3 12

+/-

3 11

+/-

3 10

+/-

3 11

+/-

3 12

+/-

3 12

+/-

3 04/04/2024 11

+/-

4 9

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 9

+/-

4 11

+/-

4 9

+/-

4 10

+/-

4 11

+/-

4 04/10/2024 13

+/-

4 12

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 12

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 04/18/2024 17

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 (1) 17

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 04/25/2024 11

+/-

5 9

+/-

5 9

+/-

5 9

+/-

4 8

+/-

4 11

+/-

5 10

+/-

5 10

+/-

5 12

+/-

5 05/01/2024 16

+/-

4 14

+/-

4 13

+/-

3 17

+/-

5 16

+/-

4 14

+/-

3 15

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 14

+/-

3 05/09/2024 9

+/-

4 10

+/-

4 8

+/-

4 9

+/-

4 9

+/-

4 10

+/-

4 12

+/-

4 14

+/-

4 12

+/-

4 05/16/2024 15

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 20

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 05/23/2024 9

+/-

4 11

+/-

4 9

+/-

4 9

+/-

4 9

+/-

4 12

+/-

4 9

+/-

4 11

+/-

4 14

+/-

4 (1) See Sample Deviation Table

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 35 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 11, Weekly Air Particulate Gross Beta (E-3 pCi/m3) Contd (1) See Sample Deviation Table Collection Date L-03 L-05 L-01 L-06 L-04 L-07 L-08 L-11A L-10 05/30/2024 16

+/-

4 18

+/-

5 20

+/-

5 16

+/-

4 18

+/-

5 18

+/-

5 17

+/-

4 19

+/-

5 19

+/-

5 06/05/2024 13

+/-

4 12

+/-

3 13

+/-

4 14

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 12

+/-

3 11

+/-

3 15

+/-

4 12

+/-

3 06/13/2024 17

+/-

4 21

+/-

4 24

+/-

5 21

+/-

4 21

+/-

4 24

+/-

5 17

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 20

+/-

4 06/20/2024 16

+/-

5 13

+/-

5 15

+/-

5 16

+/-

5 18

+/-

5 16

+/-

5 15

+/-

5 17

+/-

5 21

+/-

5 06/26/2024 11

+/-

4 10

+/-

4 17

+/-

5 11

+/-

4 14

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 11

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 14

+/-

4 07/02/2024 18

+/-

4 23

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 20

+/-

4 23

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 22

+/-

4 07/10/2024 16

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 14

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 20

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 07/17/2024 11

+/-

3 13

+/-

4 12

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 07/25/2024 15

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 14

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 08/01/2024 (1) 22

+/-

5 29

+/-

5 26

+/-

5 26

+/-

5 25

+/-

5 26

+/-

5 21

+/-

5 30

+/-

5 08/07/2024 (1) 21

+/-

4 20

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 21

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 21

+/-

4 08/15/2024 (1) 19

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 08/22/2024 (1) 26

+/-

5 28

+/-

5 29

+/-

5 25

+/-

5 29

+/-

5 31

+/-

5 25

+/-

5 32

+/-

5 08/29/2024 (1) 17

+/-

5 19

+/-

5 11

+/-

4 18

+/-

5 16

+/-

5 15

+/-

5 15

+/-

5 14

+/-

4 09/04/2024 (1) 25

+/-

5 23

+/-

4 21

+/-

4 21

+/-

4 24

+/-

4 25

+/-

4 21

+/-

4 25

+/-

4 09/13/2024 (1) 27

+/-

5 34

+/-

6 31

+/-

5 32

+/-

5 34

+/-

6 36

+/-

6 31

+/-

6 30

+/-

5 09/19/2024 (1) 19

+/-

5 20

+/-

5 21

+/-

5 21

+/-

5 22

+/-

5 23

+/-

5 22

+/-

5 23

+/-

5 09/26/2024 (1) 14

+/-

4 17

+/-

5 16

+/-

5 18

+/-

5 18

+/-

5 21

+/-

5 19

+/-

5 20

+/-

5 10/02/2024 (1) 24

+/-

5 31

+/-

5 28

+/-

5 24

+/-

5 30

+/-

5 24

+/-

5 29

+/-

5 27

+/-

5 10/09/2024 23

+/-

4 25

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 21

+/-

4 21

+/-

4 27

+/-

5 22

+/-

4 22

+/-

4 23

+/-

4 10/17/2024 25

+/-

5 31

+/-

5 30

+/-

5 24

+/-

5 24

+/-

5 29

+/-

5 25

+/-

5 24

+/-

5 30

+/-

5 10/24/2024 29

+/-

5 26

+/-

5 32

+/-

5 31

+/-

5 29

+/-

5 35

+/-

5 32

+/-

5 31

+/-

5 31

+/-

5

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 36 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 11, Weekly Air Particulate Gross Beta (E-3 pCi/m3) Contd Collection Date L-03 L-05 L-01 L-06 L-04 L-07 L-08 L-11A L-10 10/31/2024 9

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 13

+/-

4 18

+/-

5 11

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 14

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 15

+/-

4 11/06/2024 19

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 20

+/-

4 16

+/-

4 18

+/-

4 20

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 22

+/-

4 11/14/2024 30

+/-

5 26

+/-

5 23

+/-

5 25

+/-

5 20

+/-

4 30

+/-

5 21

+/-

4 29

+/-

5 24

+/-

5 11/21/2024 21

+/-

5 18

+/-

5 19

+/-

5 16

+/-

5 19

+/-

5 16

+/-

5 18

+/-

5 23

+/-

5 20

+/-

5 11/27/2024 28

+/-

5 29

+/-

5 28

+/-

5 27

+/-

5 25

+/-

4 25

+/-

4 24

+/-

4 26

+/-

5 25

+/-

4 12/04/2024 22

+/-

4 22

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 21

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 23

+/-

4 23

+/-

4 22

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 12/12/2024 31

+/-

5 28

+/-

5 29

+/-

5 30

+/-

5 29

+/-

5 28

+/-

5 28

+/-

5 32

+/-

5 26

+/-

5 12/19/2024 23

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 20

+/-

4 23

+/-

4 19

+/-

4 21

+/-

4 17

+/-

4 12/26/2024 32

+/-

6 32

+/-

6 31

+/-

6 28

+/-

6 33

+/-

6 31

+/-

6 39

+/-

7 31

+/-

6 37

+/-

6

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 37 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 12: Quarterly Air Particulate Gamma Isotopic (E-3 pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma)

(1) Increased MDAs are based on limited sample volume. See Sample Deviations Table.

Station Nuclide Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 L-03 Mn-54 2

2 5

2 Co-58 3

3 9

4 Fe-59 9

11 42 12 Co-60 2

3 5

2 Zn-65 3

5 15 6

Nb-95 3

4 11 5

Zr-95 5

6 18 8

Cs-134 2

2 4

2 Cs-137 2

2 4

2 Ba-140 96 197 <

2706(1) <

228 La-140 59 40 1518(1) <

116 L-05 Mn-54 2

2 3

4 Co-58 3

4 5

5 Fe-59 9

13 16 18 Co-60 3

2 3

5 Zn-65 7

5 11 10 Nb-95 3

4 7

7 Zr-95 6

7 11 11 Cs-134 2

1 4

4 Cs-137 2

1 3

3 Ba-140 65 208 <

469 421 La-140 38 73 238 182 Station Nuclide Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 L-01 Mn-54 3

4 3

2 Co-58 3

7 5

4 Fe-59 12 22 10 10 Co-60 3

4 2

3 Zn-65 8

10 9

5 Nb-95 5

7 6

3 Zr-95 7

16 8

5 Cs-134 3

5 3

2 Cs-137 3

4 2

2 Ba-140 170 537 430 259 La-140 85 232 110 131 L-06 Mn-54 2

5 2

3 Co-58 2

8 3

5 Fe-59 8

24 14 12 Co-60 3

4 2

2 Zn-65 6

8 8

6 Nb-95 4

8 4

5 Zr-95 5

13 7

7 Cs-134 2

5 3

3 Cs-137 2

4 2

3 Ba-140 124 507 282 303 La-140 59 234 152 95

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 38 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 12: Quarterly Air Particulate Gamma Isotopic (E-3 pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma) Contd Station Nuclide Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Station Nuclide Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 L-04 Mn-54 2

4 3

3 L-08 Mn-54 2

2 5

< 2 Co-58 3

5 4

4 Co-58 3

4 8

< 3 Fe-59 11 17 10 16 Fe-59 12 14 23

< 12 Co-60 3

4 3

4 Co-60 2

2 5

< 3 Zn-65 5

10 6

5 Zn-65 6

7 10

< 5 Nb-95 2

7 4

5 Nb-95 4

3 6

< 4 Zr-95 7

12 7

8 Zr-95 6

7 15

< 7 Cs-134 2

5 3

3 Cs-134 2

2 5

< 3 Cs-137 2

3 2

2 Cs-137 2

2 3

< 2 Ba-140 127 385 304 303 Ba-140 123 282 613

< 250 La-140 26 150 148 92 La-140 73 105 277

< 94 L-07 Mn-54 2

2 2

2 L-11A Mn-54 2

4 2

< 3 Co-58 3

4 2

3 Co-58 3

6 2

< 2 Fe-59 7

12 11 9

Fe-59 10 22 9

< 15 Co-60 3

2 2

2 Co-60 2

4 1

< 2 Zn-65 7

5 5

5 Zn-65 6

14 5

< 7 Nb-95 4

4 4

3 Nb-95 4

7 3

< 5 Zr-95 7

6 6

4 Zr-95 7

12 6

< 8 Cs-134 2

2 2

2 Cs-134 2

5 1

< 3 Cs-137 2

2 2

2 Cs-137 2

3 1

< 2 Ba-140 137 212 301 176 Ba-140 119 448 280

< 210 La-140 61 104 100 113 La-140 70 186 137

< 91

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 39 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 12: Quarterly Air Particulate Gamma Isotopic (E-3 pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma) Contd Station Nuclide Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 L-10 Mn-54 3

3 2

4 Co-58 6

7 4

5 Fe-59 18 15 16 11 Co-60 4

4 2

4 Zn-65 9

9 5

9 Nb-95 5

5 5

7 Zr-95 7

10 9

12 Cs-134 4

3 3

4 Cs-137 3

4 2

3 Ba-140 218 336 348 341 La-140 93 107 131 148

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 40 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 (1) See Sample Deviation Table Table 13, Weekly Air Iodine I-131 (E-3 pCi/m3)

Collection Date L-03 L-05 L-01 L-06 L-04 L-07 L-08 L-11A L-10 01/04/2024 27 55 55

< 50 54 52 51

< 34 52 01/10/2024 41 43 42

< 21 29 31 31

< 32 30 01/18/2024 53 29 53

< 49 53 48 48

< 34 49 01/25/2024 50 24 48

< 49 50 59 39

< 59 58 01/31/2024 60 60 60

< 54 29 55 53

< 27 55 02/07/2024 28 29 28

< 28 18 28 28

< 14 28 02/15/2024 49 50 26

< 51 50 50 51

< 24 50 02/22/2024 51 28 52

< 54 51 56 55

< 28 54 02/28/2024 43 43 43

< 43 34 57 56

< 24 56 03/06/2024 42 22 42

< 42 42 46 46

< 55 47 03/14/2024 38 20 39

< 33 37 34 33

< 23 33 03/21/2024 50 51 51

< 50 22 34 34

< 34 33 03/27/2024 49 22 48

< 48 48 63 62

< 27 61 04/04/2024 22 32 34 34 33 46 46

< 33 47 04/10/2024 57 26 58 57 58 42 41

< 28 41 04/18/2024 42 21 (1) 35 41 34 34

< 24 33 04/25/2024 55 55 63 54 55 63 62

< 27 62 05/01/2024 42 43 42 39 42 32 33

< 22 33 05/09/2024 45 46 46 24 45 47 46

< 47 45 05/16/2024 44 43 51 29 43 29 29

< 20 29 05/23/2024 33 17 35 34 34 27 27

< 18 27

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 41 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 13, Weekly Air Iodine I-131 (E-3 pCi/m3) Contd Collection Date L-03 L-05 L-01 L-06 L-04 L-07 L-08 L-11A L-10 05/30/2024 31 22 32 32 33 56

< 57 28

< 56 06/05/2024 42 42 21 51 40 52

< 52 25

< 51 06/13/2024 27 27 18 27 27 44

< 44 22

< 43 06/20/2024 36 26 37 36 36 59

< 57 29

< 56 06/26/2024 46 47 26 49 50 62

< 63 50

< 62 07/02/2024 54 29 55 54 53 55

< 55 27

< 56 07/10/2024 56 55 67 58 57 28 59 60 57 07/17/2024 31 22 32 31 31 52 52 23 51 07/25/2024 44 43 22 44 44 60 60 29 60 08/01/2024 (1) 41 28 41 41 41 62 32 61 08/07/2024 (1) 31 30 30 30 37 37 38 37 08/15/2024 (1) 48 39 48 48 48 48 25 48 08/22/2024 (1) 20 38 38 39 48 47 25 46 08/29/2024 (1) 49 28 51 50 57 58 58 26 09/04/2024 (1) 21 43 41 42 35 35 19 34 09/13/2024 (1) 60 32 64 62 62 63 30 61 09/19/2024 (1) 41 52 51 50 63 63 29 60 09/26/2024 (1) 28 65 63 64 65 42 42 40 10/02/2024 (1) 35 68 65 67 53 53 26 51 10/09/2024 24 24 12 25 24 25 25 17 24 10/17/2024 37 26 38 37 36 44 44 22 42 10/24/2024 33 23 33 32 32 57 57 30 55 (1) See Sample Deviation Table

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 42 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 13, Weekly Air Iodine I-131 (E-3 pCi/m3) Contd Collection Date L-03 L-05 L-01 L-06 L-04 L-07 L-08 L-11A L-10 10/31/2024 64 67 34 64 69 65 62 34 63 11/06/2024 30 20 30 28 29 45 45 31 44 11/14/2024 45 47 25 51 44 52 51 27 51 11/21/2024 55 56 24 50 55 50 49 55 49 11/27/2024 53 56 27 65 55 66 64 34 63 12/04/2024 37 20 36 19 36 27 26 27 27 12/12/2024 65 67 66 32 65 61 60 32 62 12/19/2024 41 41 28 42 41 48 46 23 47 12/26/2024 46 47 33 48 48 62 62 30 61

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 43 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 14: Annual Food Products Gamma Isotopic (pCi/kg Wet +/- 2 Sigma)

Station Collection Dates Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 L-42 Pasturage 01/04/2024 30 28 55

< 36 72 32 66 40 33 25 105 21 Pasturage 02/07/2024 37 32 79

< 52 99 35 74 49 37 28 159 38 Pasturage 03/06/2024 33 35 76

< 34 77 37 70 50 33 34 146 44 Pasturage 04/04/2024 29 32 73

< 46 92 31 54 47 34 34 143 38 Pasturage 05/01/2024 21 20 53

< 23 59 18 42 33 27 23 91 31 Pasturage 05/16/2024 35 22 69

< 43 68 31 50 51 39 31 138 37 Pasturage 05/30/2024 34 34 69

< 46 70 39 66 48 39 36 130 50 L-QUAD 1 Broccoli 07/17/2024 22 27 43

< 21 64 15 39 37 21 25 100 31 Cabbage 07/17/2024 35 29 62

< 36 73 34 54 52 35 39 150 42 Potato 07/17/2024 18 19 42

< 18 43 20 28 32 22 20 89 21

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 44 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 14: Annual Food Products Gamma Isotopic (pCi/kg Wet +/- 2 Sigma) Contd Station Collection Dates Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 L-QUAD 2 Brussel Sprouts 07/10/2024 30 27 75

< 36 57

< 35 30 42 32

< 26 102 49 Cabbage 07/10/2024 28 30 57

< 32 53

< 32 60 40 29

< 29 121 28 Horseradish 07/10/2024 25 22 47

< 17 57

< 16 41 27 22

< 23 101 27 L-QUAD 3 Lettuce 07/17/2024 21 20 43

< 26 51

< 25 44 34 23

< 24 101 33 Turnip 07/17/2024 25 23 53

< 27 55

< 26 44 42 24

< 29 123 33 L-QUAD 4 Cabbage 07/10/2024 19 23 52

< 20 46

< 19 36 33 20

< 24 95 22 Kale 07/10/2024 28 26 48

< 33 67

< 28 54 37 34

< 33 114 44 Red Beets 07/10/2024 16 17 40

< 15 43

< 19 32 29 19

< 16 68 18

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 45 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 15: Monthly Vegetation Gamma Isotopic (pCi/Kg Wet +/- 2 Sigma)

Station Collection Dates Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 L-CONTROL Clover 05/16/2024 37

< 31

< 86

< 36

< 77

< 25

< 59

< 44

< 40

< 34

< 159

< 44 Dandelion 05/16/2024 24

< 34

< 80

< 39

< 69

< 29

< 46

< 49

< 31

< 31

< 131

< 49 Grass 05/23/2024 37

< 33

< 69

< 39

< 73

< 39

< 55

< 51

< 32

< 35

< 139

< 35 Clover 06/13/2024 38

< 39

< 66

< 42

< 83

< 35

< 76

< 52

< 40

< 42

< 180

< 49 Grass 06/13/2024 37

< 34

< 88

< 45

< 77

< 40

< 63

< 53

< 41

< 30

< 149

< 48 Milkweed 06/13/2024 45

< 47

< 85

< 36

< 94

< 44

< 66

< 53

< 46

< 49

< 185

< 46 Collard greens 07/10/2024 30

< 25

< 66

< 25

< 51

< 25

< 41

< 35

< 30

< 27

< 107

< 27 Red beets 07/10/2024 17

< 20

< 46

< 22

< 47

< 23

< 34

< 30

< 23

< 19

< 96

< 25 Red beets leaves 07/10/2024 25

< 28

< 71

< 33

< 77

< 35

< 56

< 34

< 25

< 31

< 121

< 45 Swiss chard 07/10/2024 19

< 19

< 42

< 27

< 46

< 19

< 35

< 24

< 19

< 19

< 81

< 28 Clover 07/25/2024

< 25

< 26

< 54

< 31

< 59

< 28

< 50

< 40

< 28

< 30

< 110

< 33 Grass 07/25/2024

< 37

< 32

< 72

< 41

< 82

< 35

< 62

< 53

< 38

< 35

< 159

< 40 Milkweed 07/25/2024 43

< 42

< 87

< 46

< 87

< 37

< 56

< 51

< 42

< 40

< 170

< 63 Milkweed 08/14/2024 30

< 15

< 74

< 44

< 59

< 30

< 51

< 32

< 29

< 29

< 89

< 32 Cottonwood leaves 08/22/2024 40

< 33

< 89

< 45

< 66

< 46

< 64

< 51

< 42

< 43

< 153

< 49 Grass 08/22/2024 29

< 33

< 73

< 39

< 79

< 33

< 64

< 46

< 35

< 33

< 151

< 55 Milkweed 09/19/2024 13

< 13

< 27

< 13

< 29

< 14

< 22

< 20

< 14

< 13

< 59

< 16 Cottonwood 09/19/2024 30

< 31

< 68

< 33

< 61

< 32

< 64

< 52

< 30

< 30

< 130

< 27 Goldenrod 09/19/2024 34

< 36

< 80

< 48

< 76

< 27

< 68

< 49

< 40

< 36

< 143

< 46 Clover 10/09/2024 22

< 20

< 50

< 24

< 48

< 21

< 35

< 33

< 23

< 21

< 93

< 30 Dandelion 10/09/2024 16

< 16

< 31

< 19

< 36

< 17

< 27

< 23

< 16

< 15

< 67

< 19 Grass 10/09/2024 20

< 19

< 43

< 23

< 49

< 22

< 36

< 32

< 22

< 20

< 91

< 28

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 46 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 15: Monthly Vegetation Gamma Isotopic (pCi/Kg Wet +/- 2 Sigma) Contd Station Collection Dates Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 L-ESE-1 Clover 05/16/2024

< 34 32 77 35 89 27 43 44

< 33 33 133 51 Dandelion 05/16/2024

< 31 31 60 32 81 34 47 46

< 39 29 142 37 Grass 05/23/2024

< 32 25 77 43 66 30 48 50

< 34 30 137 41 Dandelion 06/13/2024

< 37 36 85 44 83 36 56 52

< 39 41 176 50 Grass 06/13/2024

< 47 39 103 49 131 37 79 55

< 44 33 161 62 Vetch 06/13/2024

< 35 31 80 40 81 32 60 51

< 40 38 144 52 Clover 07/17/2024

< 21 22 48 26 48 24 41 37

< 26 24 100 31 Dandelion 07/17/2024

< 16 17 40 18 38 16 28 25

< 17 16 75 25 Vetch 07/17/2024

< 16 16 34 17 33 16 29 27

< 18 17 74 23 Clover 08/14/2024

< 31 41 73 42 83 29 66 40

< 42 41 103 28 Dandelion 08/14/2024

< 28

< 31

< 66

< 34

< 64

< 27

< 49

< 30

< 27

< 30

< 109

< 28 Grass 08/14/2024

< 24

< 22

< 47

< 29

< 53

< 22

< 38

< 23

< 28

< 26

< 78

< 25 Clover 09/19/2024

< 37 39 88 48 89 44 72 51

< 33 39 145 49 Dandelion 09/19/2024

< 29 32 56 34 54 29 70 37

< 31 35 136 6

corn leaves 09/19/2024

< 36 41 92 52 76 26 64 47

< 41 41 177 54 Clover 10/09/2024

< 19 19 42 21 44 19 34 29

< 20 20 87 25 Dandelion 10/09/2024

< 34 37 59 46 91 43 64 48

< 42 44 166 50 Grass 10/09/2024

< 35 32 82 34 82 28 63 51

< 34 42 162 47 L-ESE-2 Clover 05/16/2024

< 28 31 63 29 60 30 54 43

< 37 30 116 43 Dandelion 05/16/2024

< 37 35 82 35 90 33 57 44

< 42 35 150 42 Grass 05/23/2024

< 34 32 69 35 76 32 59 50

< 34 35 146 40 Grass 06/13/2024

< 41 40 97 45 90 47 64 52

< 48 43 179 42 Clover 06/20/2024

< 37

< 38

< 76

< 55

< 108

< 40

< 55

< 44

< 41

< 36

< 141

< 58 Corn leaves 06/20/2024

< 38

< 36

< 80

< 38

< 82

< 43

< 53

< 55

< 44

< 43

< 154

< 51

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 47 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 15: Monthly Vegetation Gamma Isotopic (pCi/Kg Wet +/- 2 Sigma) Contd Station Collection Dates Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 L-ESE-2 Clover 07/17/2024 33 31 66 38 58

< 32 59 51 38

< 33 146 32 Dandelion 07/17/2024 35 22 75 33 90

< 30 61 52 36

< 35 154 43 Toothwort 07/17/2024 20 19 41 21 42

< 20 33 27 22

< 18 83 28 Clover 08/14/2024 20 19 38 21 52

< 23 35 21 23

< 22 67 24 Dandelion 08/14/2024 27 22 58 30 61

< 25 45 27 30

< 25 94 24 Milkweed 08/14/2024 16 15 34 20 40

< 17 27 18 19

< 17 58 20 Clover 09/19/2024 37 30 83 35 53

< 36 61 34 37

< 37 132 54 Dandelion 09/19/2024 35 36 87 41 92

< 36 54 50 42

< 38 170 54 Milkweed 09/19/2024 16 16 35 18 37

< 16 28 23 18

< 17 72 21 Clover 10/09/2024 18 17 39 20 41

< 18 33 28 20

< 19 77 26 Dandelion 10/09/2024

< 23

< 21

< 43

< 25

< 48

< 23

< 39

< 34

< 24

< 25

< 102

< 27

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 48 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 16, Monthly Surface Water Gross Beta (pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma)

Collection Date L-21 L-40 01/04/2024 9

+/-

3 6

+/-

3 02/07/2024 6

+/-

2 8

+/-

2 03/06/2024 8

+/-

3 9

+/-

3 04/04/2024 4

+/-

2 5

+/-

2 05/01/2024 5

+/-

2 7

+/-

2 06/05/2024 8

+/-

2 6

+/-

2 07/02/2024 12

+/-

3 7

+/-

2 08/01/2024 7

+/-

2 8

+/-

2 09/04/2024 9

+/-

2 10

+/-

2 10/02/2024 11

+/-

3 12

+/-

3 11/06/2024 8

+/-

2 5

+/-

2 12/04/2024 13

+/-

3 11

+/-

3

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 49 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 17: Monthly Surface Water Gamma Isotopic (pCi/L+/- 2 Sigma )

Station Collection Dates Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 L-21 01/04/2024 01/31/2024 2

2 4

2 3

2 3

9 2

< 2

< 16

< 5 02/07/2024 02/28/2024 3

3 7

3 5

3 5

11 3

< 3

< 22

< 7 03/06/2024 03/27/2024 2

2 4

2 4

2 3

8 2

< 2

< 15

< 5 04/04/2024 04/25/2024 4

4 10 4

8 5

7 14 4

< 4

< 33

< 7 05/01/2024 05/30/2024 2

2 4

2 3

2 3

10 2

< 2

< 18

< 6 06/05/2024 06/26/2024 3

3 7

3 6

3 5

10 3

< 3

< 20

< 8 07/02/2024 07/25/2024 3

3 8

3 6

4 7

13 3

< 3

< 25

< 9 08/01/2024 08/29/2024 2

2 4

2 3

2 3

9 2

< 2

< 15

< 6 09/04/2024 09/26/2024 2

2 5

3 5

3 4

10 3

< 2

< 19

< 7 10/02/2024 10/31/2024 1

1 3

2 3

1 3

8 1

< 1

< 14

< 4 11/06/2024 11/27/2024 2

2 5

2 4

2 4

9 2

< 2

< 17

< 5 12/04/2024 12/31/2024 1

2 4

1 3

2 3

9 2

< 1

< 16

< 5

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 50 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 17: Monthly Surface Water Gamma Isotopic (pCi/L+/- 2 Sigma ) Contd Station Collection Dates Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 L-40 01/04/2024 01/31/2024 1

1 3

1 3

< 1 3

7 1

< 1 13

< 4 02/07/2024 02/28/2024 3

2 6

3 5

< 3 5

9 3

< 3 20

< 7 03/06/2024 03/27/2024 2

2 5

2 4

< 2 3

8 2

< 2 16

< 6 04/04/2024 04/25/2024 3

4 9

4 7

< 3 7

14 3

< 3 28

< 10 05/01/2024 05/30/2024 2

2 5

2 4

< 2 3

11 2

< 2 19

< 6 06/05/2024 06/26/2024 3

3 6

3 5

< 3 5

10 3

< 3 20

< 6 07/02/2024 07/25/2024 3

3 7

3 6

< 3 5

11 3

< 3 22

< 8 08/01/2024 08/29/2024 2

2 4

2 4

< 2 3

10 2

< 2 17

< 6 09/04/2024 09/26/2024 3

3 7

3 6

< 3 6

13 3

< 3 25

< 10 10/02/2024 10/31/2024 2

2 5

2 4

< 2 4

11 2

< 2 20

< 7 11/06/2024 11/27/2024 2

2 5

2 4

< 2 4

9 2

< 2 18

< 5 12/04/2024 12/31/2024 1

1 3

1 3

< 1 2

8 1

< 1 12

< 4

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 51 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 18: Quarterly Surface Water Tritium (pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma)

A Recount B Reanalysis Station Collection Dates H-3 L-21 01/04/2024 03/27/2024 395

+/-

127 01/04/2024 03/27/2024 A 286

+/-

130 01/04/2024 03/27/2024 B 374

+/-

136 04/04/2024 06/26/2024 198

+/-

129 07/02/2024 09/26/2024

< 194 10/02/2024 12/31/2024 371

+/-

132 10/02/2024 12/31/2024A 358

+/-

137 10/02/2024 12/31/2024B 385

+/-

135 L-40 01/04/2024 03/27/2024 380

+/-

129 01/04/2024 03/27/2024A 360

+/-

135 01/04/2024 03/27/2024B 366

+/-

135 04/04/2024 06/26/2024

< 195 07/02/2024 09/26/2024

< 195 10/02/2024 12/31/2024 423

+/-

130 10/02/2024 12/31/2024A 430

+/-

132 10/02/2024 12/31/2024B 404

+/-

132

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 52 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 19, Quarterly Ground Water Tritium (pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma)

(1) Samples not required for this quarter.

Collection Date L-27 L-28-W4 L-28-W5 L-28-W6 01/10/2024 188 199 (1)

< 188 04/10/2024 192 (1) 196

< 194 07/10/2024 188 187 (1)

< 190 10/09/2024 187 (1) 188

< 184

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 53 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 20: Quarterly Ground Water Gamma Isotopic (pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma)

Station Collection Dates Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 L-27 01/10/2024 01/10/2024

< 5 4

12 5

12 5

< 8 5

5

< 30 12 04/10/2024 04/10/2024

< 5 7

13 8

11 6

< 12 7

6

< 30 9

07/10/2024 07/10/2024

< 5 4

8 6

12 5

< 10 7

5

< 27 11 10/09/2024 10/09/2024

< 5 5

14 7

10 6

< 8 5

5

< 22 8

L-28-W4 01/10/2024 01/10/2024

< 5 5

10 6

11 7

< 8 6

4

< 35 12 07/10/2024 07/10/2024

< 7 7

19 7

15 8

< 12 7

7

< 35 13 L-28-W5 04/10/2024 04/10/2024

< 4 6

12 6

13 6

< 10 6

6

< 25 10 10/09/2024 10/09/2024

< 4 4

10 5

9 5

< 8 5

5

< 19 5

L-28-W6 01/10/2024 01/10/2024

< 4 5

11 5

11 6

< 9 5

5

< 34 11 04/10/2024 04/10/2024

< 7 6

13 7

11 6

< 9 7

5

< 33 10 07/10/2024 07/10/2024

< 6 6

13 9

9 7

< 12 7

7

< 37 11 10/09/2024 10/09/2024

< 4 4

10 5

11 6

< 9 6

6

< 24 7

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 54 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 21: Semi-Annual Fish Gamma Isotopic (pCi/kg Wet +/- 2 Sigma)

Station Collection Dates Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 L-34 Bluegill 06/03/2024 37 40 140

< 70 99 61 98 61

< 44 270 102 Common Carp 06/03/2024 51 47 116

< 55 119 59 81 65

< 58 300 82 Channel Catfish 09/23/2024 38 58 144

< 48 144 60 100 65

< 35 706 264 Largemouth Bass 09/23/2024 41 46 120

< 41 105 55 76 42

< 38 607 181 L-35 Black Buffalo 06/04/2024 31 52 100

< 68 122 65 85 65

< 44 245 113 Common Carp 06/04/2024 55 44 127

< 52 118 53 105 57

< 53 252 87 Black Buffalo 09/24/2024 49 46 139

< 57 127 50 81 50

< 52 578 163 Common Carp 09/24/2024 63 54 186

< 57 147 64 117 60

< 54 476 159 L-36 Black Buffalo 06/04/2024 65 75 131

< 65 132 73 113 71

< 62 323 84 Channel Catfish 06/04/2024 61 62 123

< 72 133 79 128 76

< 70 319 110 Black Buffalo 09/24/2024 49 62 132

< 77 125 58 91 64

< 49 537 130 Common Carp 09/24/2024 58 53 132

< 55 111 57 114 52

< 51 550 226

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 55 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 22: Semi-Annual Shoreline Sediment Gamma Isotopic (pCi/kg Dry +/- 2 Sigma)

Station Collection Dates Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 L-21 05/15/2024 81 85 147 100 152 74 115

< 93

< 99

< 364 113 10/16/2024 81 71 171 84 220 102 156

< 97

< 107

< 362 128 L-40 05/15/2024 85 75 158 89 200 93 138

< 97

< 94

< 385 92 10/16/2024 53 47 126 66 134 63 101

< 64

< 58

< 238 81 L-41 06/04/2024 59 60 125 63 151 66 111

< 76

< 75

< 279 91 09/24/2024 59 56 122 61 111 62 101

< 59

< 58

< 432 109

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 56 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

, Cross Check Intercomparison Program Participation in cross check intercomparison studies is mandatory for laboratories performing analyses of REMP samples satisfying the requirements in the Offsite Site Dose Calculation Manual. Intercomparison studies provide a consistent and effective means to evaluate the accuracy and precision of analyses performed by a laboratory.

Study results should fall within specified control limits and results that fall outside the control limits are investigated and corrected.

Teledyne Brown Engineering Inc. (TBE) participated in the following proficiency testing studies provided by Eckert Ziegler Analytics, DOEs Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), and/or Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) in 2024. The Laboratorys intercomparison program results for 2024 are summarized below.

For the TBE laboratory, 152 out of 167 analyses performed met the specified acceptance criteria. Fifteen analyses did not meet the specified acceptance criteria and were addressed through the TBE Corrective Action Program. A summary is found below:

I. NCR 24-02: ERA March MRAD-40 study with Air Particulate AM-241 evaluated as Not Acceptable. TBE reported 38.8 pCi/filter and the known value returned at 55.0 pCi/filter (range 39.3-73.3). The root cause investigation determined that the sample was not logged into the system correctly and therefore not prepared with the required tracer. To correct and prevent recurrence, personnel involved are to utilize a template to ensure all analyses are logged as required and the QA Manager will perform sample log review as a back up to ensure accuracy. Acceptable results returned in a later sample study, supporting effectiveness of corrective action.

II.

NCR 24-03: ERA March MRAD-40 air particulate study GR-B evaluated as Not Acceptable. TBE reported 42.1 pCi/filter and the known value returned at 22.2 pCi/filter (range 13.5-33.5). The root cause investigation determined that alpha-to-beta crosstalk was more significant than normal which caused the beta activity to report falsely high data. To correct and prevent recurrence, personnel involved are to adjust the alpha-to-beta crosstalk via correction calculation measures when high alpha activities are observed. Acceptable results returned in a later sample study, supporting effectiveness of corrective action.

III.

NCR 24-05: ERA April RAD-137 water study GR-A evaluated as Not Acceptable.

TBE reported 35.2 pCi/L and the known value returned at 52.6 pCi/L (range 39.6-65.6). The root cause investigation determined that the provided samples contained a solids content that was significantly higher than the typical client samples tested by the laboratory. A set aliquot volume for prior ERA samples was used and not adjusted to account for the sudden increase in solid content. To correct and prevent recurrence, new sample types were ordered from ERA that used Am-241 to better reflect client sample testing and acceptable results were achieved. Acceptable results returned in a later sample study, supporting effectiveness of corrective action.

IV.

NCR 24-06: E&Z Analytics March E14092 air particulate study Co-60 evaluated as Not Acceptable. TBE reported 168 pCi and the known value returned at 126 pCi.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 57 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Additionally, March E14093 soil Ce-141 evaluated as Not Acceptable. TBE reported 0.106pCi/g and the known value returned at 0.071pCi/g. The root cause investigation was unable to determine any anomaly thus no proposed corrective action. No recurrence has occurred.

V.

CAR 24-02 (CAR 23-31): MAPEP February 24-MaS50 soil study Fe-55 evaluated as Not Acceptable. TBE reported 297 Bg/Kg and the known value returned at 650 Bg/Kb (range 455-845). The root cause investigation suspects that the current analytical procedure is not sufficient to add the interferences added to the sample by MAPEP.

This investigation is still ongoing (See NCR 24-16) as the suggested corrective action did not provide desired results.

VI.

NCR 24-08: MAPEP February 24-MaS50 soil study Ni-63 evaluated as Not Acceptable. TBE reported 1070 Bg/Kg and the known value returned at 1530 Bg/Kb (range 1071-1989). The root cause investigation suspected that the sample contained added interferences that are not typically seen in client samples. All QC efforts associated with the sample were acceptable and no anomalies found, even after reanalysis. To correct and prevent recurrence, samples suspected of additional interferences will include the addition of Ni-59 tracer to determine yield results when calculating results. TBE analytical procedure TBE-2013 was updated to include this change.

VII.

NCR 24-09: MAPEP February 24-MaSU50 urine study Zn-65 evaluated as Not Acceptable. The root cause investigation determined that the sample was spiked lower than TBEs typical detection limit and client requirements. The report was revised by MAPEP indicating Not Evaluated, resulting in this nuclide to not be considered a failure.

VIII.

NCR 24-10: MAPEP February 24-MaW50 water study Tc-99 evaluated as Not Acceptable. TBE reported 9.95Bg/L and the known value returned 7.47Bg/L (range 5.23-9.71). The root cause investigation suspects Thorium interference that was not removed during the column separation process of the analytical procedure; however, it cannot be confirmed as all QC efforts associated with the sample were acceptable and with no anomalies found. To potentially correct and prevent recurrence, an additional rinse step was added to the procedure. Acceptable results returned in a later sample study, supporting effectiveness of corrective action.

IX.

NCR 24-11: MAPEP February 24-RdV50 vegetation study Sr-90 evaluated as Not Acceptable. TBE reported 0.276Bg/sample and the known value returned 0.529Bg/sample (range 0.370-0.688). The root cause investigation determined a laboratory accident resulting in a spilled (loss) of sample. No corrective action was performed as the cause was an unintentional sample spill.

X.

NCR 24-14: ERA September MRAD-41 air particulate study U-234/238 evaluated as Not Acceptable. TBE reported 14.0/14.2 pCi/filter and the known value returned at 31.1/30.9 pCi/filter (range 23.1-36.9). The root cause investigation determined that the laboratory technician placed double the amount of tracer in the sample by error. To correct and prevent recurrence, samples that have been digested/leached with carrier/tracer added will have a label placed over the cap indicating it has already been added. Additionally, the beaker that aliquot is put in should have markings to indicate

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 58 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 carrier/tracer has already been added to the sample.

XI.

NCR 24-15: ERA September MRAD-41 water study Fe-55 evaluated as Not Acceptable. TBE reported 615 pCi/L and the known value returned at 1230 pCi/L (range 723-1790). The root cause is still under investigation.

XII.

NCR 24-16: MAPEP August 24-MaS50 soil study Fe-55 evaluated as Not Acceptable. TBE did not report a value and the known value returned 780Bg/Kg (range 546-1014). The root cause is still under investigation.

XIII.

NCR 24-17: MAPEP August 24-RdV51 vegetation study Sr-90 evaluated as Not Acceptable. TBE reported 0.95Bg/sample and the known value returned 2.39Bg/sample (range 1.67-3.11). The root cause is still under investigation.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 59 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 23: Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Month/Year Identification Number Matrix Nuclide Units TBE Reported Value Known Value (a)

Ratio of TBE to Analytics Result Evaluation (b)

March 2024 E14089 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 79.6 78.2 1.02 A

Sr-90 pCi/L 12.6 11.9 1.06 A

E14090 Milk Ce-141 pCi/L 75.6 85.0 0.89 A

Co-58 pCi/L

-0.069 Not Measured Co-60 pCi/L 139 158 0.88 A

Cr-51 pCi/L 212 230 0.92 A

Cs-134 pCi/L 167 198 0.84 A

Cs-137 pCi/L 158 171 0.93 A

Fe-59 pCi/L 81.1 86.5 0.94 A

I-131 pCi/L 80.9 90.8 0.89 A

Mn-54 pCi/L 173 183 0.95 A

Zn-65 pCi/L 165 176 0.93 A

E14091 Charcoal I-131 pCi 90.1 90.3 1.00 A

E14092 AP Ce-141 pCi 68.1 67.5 1.01 A

Co-58 pCi 1.73 Not Measured Co-60 pCi 168 126 1.34 N(1)

Cr-51 pCi 182 183 0.99 A

Cs-134 pCi 157 157 1.00 A

Cs-137 pCi 132 136.0 0.97 A

Fe-59 pCi 70.3 68.6 1.02 A

Mn-54 pCi 144 145 0.99 A

Zn-65 pCi 125 140 0.89 A

E14093 Soil Ce-141 pCi/g 0.106 0.071 1.48 N(1)

Co-58 pCi/g

-0.005 Not Measured Co-60 pCi/g 0.121 0.133 0.91 A

Cr-51 pCi/g 0.198 0.194 1.02 A

Cs-134 pCi/g 0.206 0.166 1.24 W

Cs-137 pCi/g 0.207 0.209 0.99 A

Fe-59 pCi/g 0.063 0.073 0.87 A

Mn-54 pCi/g 0.140 0.153 0.91 A

Zn-65 pCi/g 0.149 0.148 1.01 A

E14094 AP Sr-89 pCi 83.9 90.6 0.93 A

Sr-90 pCi 11.7 13.8 0.85 A

(a) The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation (b) Analytics evaluation based on TBE internal QC limits:

A = Acceptable - reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20 W = Acceptable with warning - reported result falls within 0.70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30 N = Not Acceptable - reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0.70 and > 1.30 (1) See NCR 24-06

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 60 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 23: Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Contd Teledyne Brown Environmental Services Month/Year Identification Number Matrix Nuclide Units TBE Reported Value Known Value (a)

Ratio of TBE to Analytics Result Evaluation (b)

September 2024 E14095 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 88.0 92.3 0.95 A

Sr-90 pCi/L 12.4 15.2 0.82 A

E14096 Milk Ce-141 pCi/L 124 124 1.00 A

Co-58 pCi/L 154 150 1.03 A

Co-60 pCi/L 232 236 0.98 A

Cr-51 pCi/L 284 274 1.04 A

Cs-134 pCi/L 180.0 187 0.96 A

Cs-137 pCi/L 126 127 0.99 A

Fe-59 pCi/L 127.0 113 1.12 A

I-131 pCi/L 85.3 89.0 0.96 A

Mn-54 pCi/L 162 162 1.00 A

Zn-65 pCi/L 294 275 1.07 A

E14097 Charcoal I-131 pCi 98.8 92.6 1.07 A

E14098 AP Ce-141 pCi 82.0 76.7 1.07 A

Co-58 pCi 91.0 92.6 0.98 A

Co-60 pCi 180 146 1.23 W

Cr-51 pCi 208 170 1.22 W

Cs-134 pCi 116 116 1.00 A

Cs-137 pCi 83.1 78.9 1.05 A

Fe-59 pCi 75.6 70.2 1.08 A

Mn-54 pCi 101 100 1.01 A

Zn-65 pCi 167 170 0.98 A

E14099 Soil Ce-141 pCi/g 0.224 0.222 1.01 A

Co-58 pCi/g 0.249 0.268 0.93 A

Co-60 pCi/g 0.420 0.423 0.99 A

Cr-51 pCi/g 0.492 0.492 1.00 A

Cs-134 pCi/g 0.278 0.336 0.83 A

Cs-137 pCi/g 0.276 0.295 0.94 A

Fe-59 pCi/g 0.233 0.204 1.14 A

Mn-54 pCi/g 0.279 0.290 0.96 A

Zn-65 pCi/g 0.538 0.494 1.09 A

E14100 AP Sr-89 pCi 79.8 82.7 0.96 A

Sr-90 pCi 12.0 13.6 0.88 A

E14197 Liquid Gr-A (Am241) pCi/L 47.6 50.1 0.95 A

Gr-B (Cs137) pCi/L 248 270 0.92 A

(a) The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation (b) Analytics evaluation based on TBE internal QC limits:

A = Acceptable - reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20 W = Acceptable with warning - reported result falls within 0.70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30 N = Not Acceptable - reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0.70 and > 1.30

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 61 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 24: DOEs Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Month/Year Identification Number Matrix Nuclide Units TBE Reported Value Known Value (a)

Acceptance Range Evaluation (b)

February 2024 24-MaS50 Soil Fe-55 Bq/kg 297 650 455 - 845 N(3)

Ni-63 Bq/kg 1070 1530 1071 - 1989 N(4)

Tc-99 Bq/kg 325 336 235 - 437 A

Th-228 Bq/kg 34.6 48.8 34.2 - 63.4 W

Th-230 Bq/kg 49.7 54.0 38.0 - 70.0 A

Th-232 Bq/kg 36.4 45.1 31.6 - 58.6 A

24-MaSU50 Urine Cs-134 Bq/L 1.12 1.36 0.95 - 1.77 A

Cs-137 Bq/L 2.00 2.23 1.56 - 2.90 A

Co-57 Bq/L 1.06 1.26 0.88 - 1.64 A

Co-60 Bq/L 2.26 2.38 1.67 - 3.09 A

K-40 Bq/L

-1.80 NR Mn-54 Bq/L 1.44 1.51 1.06 - 1.96 A

U-234 Bq/L 0.00101 (1)

A U-238 Bq/L 0.00228 (1)

A Zn-65 Bq/L

-0.42 0.84 0.59 - 1.09 NE(5) 24-MaW50 Water Ni-63 Bq/L 0.338 0.80 (2)

A Tc-99 Bq/L 9.95 7.47 5.23 - 9.71 N(6) 24-RdV50 Vegetation Cs-134 Bq/sample 2.80 3.67 2.57 - 4.77 W

Cs-137 Bq/sample 2.21 2.57 1.80 - 3.34 A

Co-57 Bq/sample 2.23 2.53 1.77 - 3.29 A

Co-60 Bq/sample 2.42 2.96 2.07 - 3.85 A

Mn-54 Bq/sample 0.033 (1)

A Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.276 0.529 0.370 - 0.688 N(7)

Zn-65 Bq/sample 6.83 8.02 5.61 - 10.43 A

(a) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation (b) DOE/MAPEP evaluation:

A = Acceptable - reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20 W = Acceptable with warning - reported result falls within 0.70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30 N = Not Acceptable - reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0.70 and > 1.30 (1) False positive test (2) Sensitivity evaluation (3) See CAR 23 Analyte not on XCHK list (4) See NCR 24-08 (5) Not Evaluated (6) See NCR 24-10 (7) See NCR 24-11 (8) Not Reported (9) See NCR 24-16 (10) See NCR 24-17

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 62 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 24: DOEs Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) Contd Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Month/Year Identification Number Matrix Nuclide Units TBE Reported Value Known Value (a)

Acceptance Range Evaluation (b)

August 2024 24-MaS51 Soil Fe-55 Bq/kg (8) 780 546 - 1014 N(9)

Ni-63 Bq/kg 1140.00 1450.00 1015 - 1885 W

Tc-99 Bq/kg 155.00 171.00 120 - 222 A

Th-228 Bq/kg 38.00 43.30 30.3 - 56.3 A

Th-230 Bq/kg 46.10 44.00 30.8 - 57.2 A

Th-232 Bq/kg 38.90 42.60 29.8 - 55.4 A

24-MaW51 Water Ni-63 Bq/L 0.60 (1)

A Tc-99 Bq/L 11.90 11.20 7.8 - 14.6 A

24-RdV51 Vegetation Cs-134 Bq/sample 3.12 2.89 2.02 - 3.76 A

Cs-137 Bq/sample 2.18 1.91 1.34 - 2.48 A

Co-57 Bq/sample 0.00 (1)

A Co-60 Bq/sample 2.24 2.01 1.41 - 2.61 A

Mn-54 Bq/sample 3.76 3.53 2.47 - 4.59 A

Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.95 2.39 1.67 - 3.11 N(10)

Zn-65 Bq/sample 10.30 9.13 6.39 - 11.87 A

(a) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation (b) DOE/MAPEP evaluation:

A = Acceptable - reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20 W = Acceptable with warning - reported result falls within 0.70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30 N = Not Acceptable - reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0.70 and > 1.30 (1) False positive test (2) Sensitivity evaluation (3) See CAR 23 Analyte not on XCHK list (4) See NCR 24-08 (5) Not Evaluated (6) See NCR 24-10 (7) See NCR 24-11 (8) Not Reported (9) See NCR 24-16 (10) See NCR 24-17

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 63 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 25: ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Month/Year Identification Number Matrix Nuclide Units TBE Reported Value Known Value (a)

Acceptance Limits Evaluation (b)

March 2024 MRAD-40 Water Am-241 pCi/L 101 139 95.4 - 178 A

Fe-55 pCi/L 2185 2480 1460- 3610 A

Pu-238 pCi/L 62.0 70.4 42.3 - 91.2 A

Pu-239 pCi/L 61.2 76.5 47.3 - 94.3 A

Soil Am-241 pCi/kg NR 1880 1020 - 2660 Pu-238 pCi/kg 667 512 255 - 778 A

Pu-239 pCi/kg 562 545 297 - 784 A

Sr-90 pCi/kg 4050 3630 1130 - 5650 A

U-234 pCi/kg 3040 4360 2040 - 5710 A

U-238 pCi/kg 3270 4320 2370 - 5800 A

AP Am-241 pCi/filter 38.8 55.0 39.3 - 73.3 N(1)

Fe-55 pCi/filter 387 386 141 - 616 A

Pu-238 pCi/filter 45.9 41.1 31.0 - 50.5 A

Pu-239 pCi/filter 54.9 56.1 41.9 - 67.7 A

U-234 pCi/filter 11.1 11.6 8.60 - 13.6 A

U-238 pCi/filter 12.8 11.5 8.68 - 13.7 A

GR-A pCi/filter 116 95.9 50.1 - 158 A

GR-B pCi/filter 42.1 22.2 13.5 - 33.5 N(2)

April 2024 RAD-137 Water Ba-133 pCi/L 62.8 65.9 50.1 - 81.7 A

Cs-134 pCi/L 51.0 57.8 42.8 - 72.8 A

Cs-137 pCi/L 153 186 149 - 223 A

Co-60 pCi/L 92.1 98.8 79.7 - 118 A

Zn-65 pCi/L 208 240 188 - 292 A

GR-A pCi/L 35.2 52.6 39.6 - 65.6 N(3)

GR-B pCi/L 49 46.5 33.9 - 59.1 A

U-Nat pCi/L 56.0 59.3 52.8-65.8 A

H-3 pCi/L 19,000 21,300 18,200 - 24,400 A

Sr-89 pCi/L 48.9 52.2 37.8 - 66.6 A

Sr-90 pCi/L 32.6 37.6 32.0 - 43.2 A

I-131 pCi/L 21.8 25.1 21.7 - 28.5 A

(a) The ERA known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(b) ERA evaluation:

A = Acceptable - Reported value falls within the Acceptance Limits N = Not Acceptable - Reported value falls outside of the Acceptance Limits (1) See NCR 24-02 (2) See NCR 24-03 (3) See NCR 24-05 (4) See NCR 24-15 (5) See NCR 24-14

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 64 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 25: ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Contd Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Month/Year Identification Number Matrix Nuclide Units TBE Reported Value Known Value (a)

Acceptance Limits Evaluation (b)

September 2024 MRAD-41 Water Am-241 pCi/L 108.0 117.0 80.3 - 150 A

Fe-55 pCi/L 615 1230 723 - 1790 N(4)

Pu-238 pCi/L 99 103 61.9 - 133 A

Pu-239 pCi/L 123 133 82.3 - 164 A

Soil Am-241 pCi/kg 1320 1110 599 - 1570 A

Pu-238 pCi/kg 1380 1860 928 - 2830 A

Pu-239 pCi/kg 796 1030 561 - 1480 A

Sr-90 pCi/kg 3240 4730 1470 - 7370 A

U-234 pCi/kg 2540 2860 1340 - 3750 A

U-238 pCi/kg 2390 2840 1560 - 3810 A

AP Am-241 pCi/filter 27.0 29.1 20.8 - 38.8 A

Fe-55 pCi/filter 644 800 292 - 1280 A

Pu-238 pCi/filter 22.3 21.5 16.2 - 26.4 A

Pu-239 pCi/filter 30.6 32.4 24.2 - 39.1 A

U-234 pCi/filter 14.0 31.1 23.1 - 36.4 N(5)

U-238 pCi/filter 14.2 30.9 23.3 - 36.9 N(5)

GR-A pCi/filter 80.0 72.4 37.8 - 119 A

GR-B pCi/filter 57.5 47.9 29.0 - 72.4 A

October 2024 RAD-139 Water Ba-133 pCi/L 30.3 27.4 15.5 - 39.3 A

Cs-134 pCi/L 73.3 80.2 63.0 - 97.4 A

Cs-137 pCi/L 46.6 46.3 23.3 - 69.3 A

Co-60 pCi/L 44.2 45.3 31.6 - 59.0 A

Zn-65 pCi/L 104 114.0 75.0 - 153 A

GR-A pCi/L 47.6 51.7 38.9 - 64.5 A

GR-B pCi/L 44.2 48.1 35.2 - 61.0 A

U-Nat pCi/L 28.3 26.90 23.6 - 30.2 A

H-3 pCi/L 4,690 5,320 3870 - 6770 A

Sr-89 pCi/L 57.5 44.2 30.6 - 57.8 A

Sr-90 pCi/L 37.3 35.6 30.2 - 41.0 A

I-131 pCi/L 28.3 26.3 22.7 - 29.9 A

(a) The ERA known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(b) ERA evaluation:

A = Acceptable - Reported value falls within the Acceptance Limits N = Not Acceptable - Reported value falls outside of the Acceptance Limits (1) See NCR 24-02 (2) See NCR 24-03 (3) See NCR 24-05 (4) See NCR 24-15 (5) See NCR 24-14

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 65 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

, Environmental Direct Radiation Dosimetry Results Monitoring Location Quarterly

Baseline, BQ (mrem)

BQ +

MDDQ Normalized Quarterly Monitoring Data, MQ Quarterly Facility Dose, Annual

Baseline, BA (mrem)

BA +

MDDA Annual Monitoring Data, MA (mrem)

Annual Facility

Dose, FA=MA-BA FQ=MQ-BQ (mrem, or ND if (mrem)

(mrem)

(mrem, or ND if FQ MDDQ)

(mrem)

FA MDDA) 1 2

3 4

1 2

3 4

L-01 18.5 23.1 19.2 22 18.9 18.5 ND ND ND ND 73.9 84.8 78.6 ND L-03 17.8 22.4 17 19.6 18.7 18.5 ND ND ND ND 71.1 81.9 73.8 ND L-04 16.9 21.5 18.3 19 17.6 16.9 ND ND ND ND 67.5 78.4 71.7 ND L-05 17.4 21.9 18.1 17.7 17.6 19.2 ND ND ND ND 69.4 80.3 72.6 ND L-06 18.1 22.7 18.5 20 19.2 19.5 ND ND ND ND 72.5 83.4 77.2 ND L-07 17.6 22.2 18.3 20.7 18.7 19.4 ND ND ND ND 70.5 81.3 77 ND L-08 16.1 20.7 15.9 16.8 18.1 16.9 ND ND ND ND 64.5 75.4 67.7 ND L-10 14.8 19.4 16.8 16.2 14.9 17.4 ND ND ND ND 59.2 70.1 65.2 ND L-101 18.4 22.9 18.8 19.8 20 21.3 ND ND ND ND 73.4 84.3 79.8 ND L-102 19.6 24.1 20.5 23.5 22.2 18.7 ND ND ND ND 78.2 89.1 84.9 ND L-103 17.8 22.4 17.6 18.4 18.2 20.5 ND ND ND ND 71.3 82.1 74.6 ND L-104 17.3 21.9 17.9 20 18.2 19.4 ND ND ND ND 69.2 80.1 75.5 ND L-105 18.9 23.5 19.2 20.2 18.6 18.9 ND ND ND ND 75.8 86.6 76.9 ND L-106 17.7 22.2 17.4 20.9 18.4 19.2 ND ND ND ND 70.6 81.5 75.9 ND L-107 18.5 23.1 18.3 21.3 19.6 19.4 ND ND ND ND 74.1 84.9 78.6 ND L-108 18.7 23.3 17.5 20 19.2 18.5 ND ND ND ND 74.8 85.6 75.2 ND L-109 17.8 22.4 17.6 20.8 19.9 18.3 ND ND ND ND 71.2 82 76.5 ND L-110 18 22.6 17.7 20.1 19.2 19.6 ND ND ND ND 72 82.8 76.7 ND L-111B 18.9 23.4 19 18.7 19.2 18.9 ND ND ND ND 75.5 86.3 75.8 ND MDDQ = Quarterly Minimum Differential Dose = 4.6 mrem MDDA = Annual Minimum Differential Dose = 10.8 mrem ND = Not Detected, where MQ (BQ+MDDQ) or MA (BA+MDDA)

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 66 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

, Environmental Direct Radiation Dosimetry Results Contd Monitoring Location Quarterly

Baseline, BQ (mrem)

BQ +

MDDQ Normalized Quarterly Monitoring Data, MQ Quarterly Facility Dose, Annual

Baseline, BA (mrem)

BA +

MDDA Annual Monitoring Data, MA (mrem)

Annual Facility

Dose, FA=MA-BA FQ=MQ-BQ (mrem, or ND if (mrem)

(mrem)

(mrem, or ND if FQ MDDQ)

(mrem)

FA MDDA) 1 2

3 4

1 2

3 4

L-112 17.5 22.1 17.6 17.9 18.2 17.2 ND ND ND ND 69.9 80.8 70.8 ND L-113A 19.5 24.1 20.1 20.5 20.7 21.3 ND ND ND ND 78 88.9 82.4 ND L-114 18.3 22.9 19.1 19.5 19.4 19.1 ND ND ND ND 73.2 84 77.1 ND L-115 17.1 21.7 18.6 18.6 19.1 18.6 ND ND ND ND 68.5 79.4 74.9 ND L-116 17.2 21.8 17.7 18.2 17.2 18.4 ND ND ND ND 68.9 79.7 71.5 ND L-11A 17 21.6 18 17.2 17.6 18.2 ND ND ND ND 67.9 78.8 71 ND L-201 14.6 19.2 15.4 15.9 16.2 16.5 ND ND ND ND 58.4 69.2 64 ND L-202 15.6 20.1 17.8 16.3 16 16.4 ND ND ND ND 62.3 73.1 66.5 ND L-203 17.7 22.2 17.8 18.7 18.6 19.6 ND ND ND ND 70.6 81.5 74.7 ND L-204 19 23.6 18.8 20.8 19.3 19.8 ND ND ND ND 75.9 86.7 78.8 ND L-205-1 18.2 22.8 18.5 18.6 19.5 20.4 ND ND ND ND 73 83.8 77 ND L-205-3 17.3 21.9 17.8 17.9 18.9 19.9 ND ND ND ND 69.2 80.1 74.4 ND L-206 18.4 22.9 19.5 19.9 18.9 20.1 ND ND ND ND 73.4 84.3 78.3 ND L-207 18.1 22.7 18.4 18.6 18.9 19.1 ND ND ND ND 72.4 83.2 75 ND L-208 18.8 23.4 19.2 22.4 19.8 18.9 ND ND ND ND 75.1 85.9 80.2 ND L-209 17.8 22.4 19.1 18.7 18.7 19 ND ND ND ND 71.3 82.1 75.5 ND L-210 19.5 24.1 19.8 20.3 20.9 18.6 ND ND ND ND 78.1 89 79.6 ND L-211 18.5 23.1 18.7 20 19.2 19.7 ND ND ND ND 74 84.9 77.7 ND MDDQ = Quarterly Minimum Differential Dose = 4.6 mrem MDDA = Annual Minimum Differential Dose = 10.8 mrem ND = Not Detected, where MQ (BQ+MDDQ) or MA (BA+MDDA)

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 67 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

, Environmental Direct Radiation Dosimetry Results Contd MDDQ = Quarterly Minimum Differential Dose = 4.6 mrem MDDA = Annual Minimum Differential Dose = 10.8 mrem ND = Not Detected, where MQ (BQ+MDDQ) or MA (BA+MDDA)

Monitoring Location Quarterly

Baseline, BQ (mrem)

BQ +

MDDQ Normalized Quarterly Monitoring Data, MQ Quarterly Facility Dose, Annual

Baseline, BA (mrem)

BA +

MDDA Annual Monitoring Data, MA (mrem)

Annual Facility

Dose, FA=MA-BA FQ=MQ-BQ (mrem, or ND if (mrem)

(mrem)

(mrem, or ND if FQ MDDQ)

(mrem)

FA MDDA) 1 2

3 4

1 2

3 4

L-212 19 23.6 20.5 19.7 18.7 17.9 ND ND ND ND 76 86.8 76.8 ND L-213 17.2 21.8 18.5 19.8 17.9 18.7 ND ND ND ND 69 79.8 74.9 ND L-214 17.5 22.1 19 19.1 18.4 17.7 ND ND ND ND 69.9 80.8 74.1 ND L-215 18.6 23.2 18.8 21.5 20 19.2 ND ND ND ND 74.5 85.4 79.4 ND L-216 18 22.6 19.8 19.3 18.3 18.6 ND ND ND ND 72.2 83 76 ND

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 68 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

, Errata Data Table 26, Quarterly DLR Results for LaSalle County Station, 2019 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 L-01 14.6 18.9 13.2 13.5 13.7 14.1 ND ND ND ND 60.0 69.6 54.5 ND L-03 13.2 17.4 13.1 12.1 11.5 11.1 ND ND ND ND 52.8 62.3 47.8 ND L-04 13.4 17.6 14.3 12.8 11.7 13.7 ND ND ND ND 53.7 63.3 52.4 ND L-05 13.1 17.3 12.8 13.4 11.8 13.9 ND ND ND ND 52.4 61.9 51.9 ND L-06 14.6 18.8 13.8 13.6 11.8 12.9 ND ND ND ND 58.4 67.9 52.2 ND L-07 14.2 18.4 13.7 13.2 12.3 14.3 ND ND ND ND 56.8 66.4 53.3 ND L-08 13.9 18.2 13.4 12.6 11.0 13.0 ND ND ND ND 55.8 65.3 49.9 ND L-10 11.4 15.6 11.4 10.7 10.2 11.1 ND ND ND ND 45.4 55.0 43.3 ND L-101 14.7 18.9 13.8 13.6 12.5 14.9 ND ND ND ND 58.8 68.4 54.8 ND L-102 16.2 20.4 15.4 12.5 16.9 17.4 ND ND ND ND 64.9 74.5 62.1 ND L-103 13.7 17.9 15.0 12.8 12.9 13.9 ND ND ND ND 54.7 64.2 54.5 ND L-104 13.0 17.2 13.1 13.2 11.5 12.3 ND ND ND ND 51.9 61.5 50.1 ND L-105 14.7 18.9 13.6 13.5 13.9 15.3 ND ND ND ND 58.6 68.2 56.2 ND L-106 14.4 18.7 13.5 12.9 12.6 14.0 ND ND ND ND 57.8 67.3 52.9 ND L-107 14.2 18.4 13.7 14.2 14.8 15.1 ND ND ND ND 56.7 66.3 57.8 ND L-108 12.5 16.7 14.3 13.6 14.7 15.6 ND ND ND ND 49.8 59.4 58.2 ND L-109 14.3 18.5 13.5 14.0 12.4 13.2 ND ND ND ND 57.1 66.7 53.2 ND L-110 14.4 18.6 14.6 10.9 13.5 14.6 ND ND ND ND 57.4 67.0 53.5 ND L-111B 14.5 18.7 14.0 13.3 13.7 14.8 ND ND ND ND 57.9 67.4 55.8 ND L-112 13.8 18.0 12.3 11.9 12.1 14.5 ND ND ND ND 55.2 64.7 50.8 ND L-113A 15.2 19.4 14.9 14.3 15.3 16.1 ND ND ND ND 60.7 70.3 60.6 ND L-114 14.6 18.8 14.6 13.5 13.6 14.5 ND ND ND ND 58.5 68.1 56.2 ND L-115 12.6 16.8 14.2 12.9 13.7 12.8 ND ND ND ND 50.4 60.0 53.5 ND L-116 12.6 16.8 12.6 11.8 10.8 13.6 ND ND ND ND 50.4 59.9 48.8 ND L-11A 11.4 15.6 11.8 3.7 12.7 12.5 ND ND ND ND 45.5 55.1 40.6 ND L-201 12.3 16.6 9.6 10.3 8.9 10.7 ND ND ND ND 49.4 58.9 39.4 ND L-202 11.6 15.8 10.3 10.6 10.4 12.1 ND ND ND ND 46.3 55.9 43.4 ND L-203 14.2 18.4 13.1 13.8 12.9 14.5 ND ND ND ND 56.7 66.2 54.2 ND L-204 14.7 18.9 14.3 13.8 14.5 14.6 ND ND ND ND 58.5 68.1 57.2 ND L-205-1 13.6 17.8 13.2 14.6 13.0 13.8 ND ND ND ND 54.3 63.9 54.6 ND L-205-3 13.6 17.8 12.0 13.7 12.0 13.2 ND ND ND ND 54.3 63.8 50.9 ND L-206 14.3 18.5 14.7 14.5 14.4 12.9 ND ND ND ND 57.2 66.7 56.5 ND L-207 13.5 17.7 13.7 13.0 12.0 13.6 ND ND ND ND 54.2 63.7 52.2 ND L-208 14.6 18.8 13.6 14.3 13.3 14.2 ND ND ND ND 59.9 69.5 55.3 ND L-209 13.7 17.9 14.0 14.6 13.7 13.6 ND ND ND ND 53.4 62.9 55.8 ND L-210 15.2 19.4 14.5 15.8 15.1 14.3 ND ND ND ND 61.4 70.9 59.8 ND L-211 14.9 19.1 14.2 14.6 13.4 16.0 ND ND ND ND 59.6 69.1 58.2 ND L-212 14.5 18.7 14.5 14.8 13.2 14.6 ND ND ND ND 57.6 67.2 57.0 ND L-213 13.3 17.5 12.7 12.7 12.5 13.4 ND ND ND ND 52.2 61.7 51.3 ND L-214 13.5 17.7 14.2 14.4 12.4 12.6 ND ND ND ND 52.4 62.0 53.6 ND L-215 15.0 19.2 14.6 14.5 13.4 15.8 ND ND ND ND 59.9 69.4 58.3 ND L-216 14.9 19.1 14.6 14.0 13.3 14.2 ND ND ND ND 59.0 68.5 56.0 ND BA +

MDDA (mrem)

Normalized Annual Dose, MA (mrem/yr)

Annual Facility Dose, FA Monitoring Location Location Quarterly

Baseline, BQ (mrem)

BQ +

MDDQ (mrem) 2021 Normalized Net Dose, MQx (mrem/std.

Qtr.)

Quarterly Facility Dose, FQ (mrem)

Annual

Baseline, BA (mrem)

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 69 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 27, Quarterly DLR Results for LaSalle County Station, 2020 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 L-01 18.2 22.9 19.6 21.4 19.2 21.1 ND ND ND ND 72.8 85.9 81.3 ND L-03 17.8 22.4 18.5 20.8 18.1 18.4 ND ND ND ND 71.0 84.1 75.9 ND L-04 16.9 21.6 18.5 20.7 17.7 20.5 ND ND ND ND 67.6 80.7 77.4 ND L-05 17.1 21.8 18.5 19.9 18.8 19.6 ND ND ND ND 68.5 81.6 76.8 ND L-06 17.9 22.6 18.7 19.8 20.0 19.9 ND ND ND ND 71.8 84.8 78.4 ND L-07 17.7 22.3 18.6 20.8 20.6 21.3 ND ND ND ND 70.7 83.8 81.3 ND L-08 16.4 21.1 18.6 20.1 18.8 19.8 ND ND ND ND 65.7 78.7 77.3 ND L-10 15.1 19.8 16.5 17.4 15.7 19.5 ND ND ND ND 60.5 73.5 69.2 ND L-101 18.2 22.9 20.4 21.8 20.9 22.4 ND ND ND ND 72.9 86.0 85.6 ND L-102 19.8 24.4 20.6 22.9 22.1 23.7 ND ND ND ND 79.0 92.1 89.3 ND L-103 17.5 22.2 19.7 21.0 20.4 19.5 ND ND ND ND 70.0 83.1 80.7 ND L-104 17.4 22.1 17.7 19.7 18.2 19.7 ND ND ND ND 69.7 82.8 75.3 ND L-105 19.0 23.7 20.2 20.4 18.6 21.2 ND ND ND ND 76.1 89.2 80.4 ND L-106 17.5 22.1 20.6 20.3 19.6 19.6 ND ND ND ND 69.8 82.9 80.1 ND L-107 18.5 23.1 19.9 21.9 21.0 22.0 ND ND ND ND 74.0 87.1 84.9 ND L-108 18.8 23.4 20.8 19.1 20.5 20.3 ND ND ND ND 75.1 88.2 80.7 ND L-109 17.4 22.0 18.5 19.5 20.9 20.1 ND ND ND ND 69.4 82.5 79.0 ND L-110 18.2 22.8 19.5 21.8 17.6 19.6 ND ND ND ND 72.6 85.7 78.5 ND L-111B 19.0 23.7 18.7 21.5 19.2 19.2 ND ND ND ND 76.1 89.2 78.6 ND L-112 17.8 22.4 19.1 19.4 20.2 20.1 ND ND ND ND 71.0 84.1 78.9 ND L-113A 19.3 23.9 22.5 23.0 20.9 21.4 ND ND ND ND 77.2 90.3 87.8 ND L-114 18.2 22.9 19.4 21.1 21.7 19.6 ND ND ND ND 73.0 86.0 81.8 ND L-115 17.5 22.1 17.9 19.4 20.8 18.6 ND ND ND ND 69.9 83.0 76.8 ND L-116 17.1 21.7 17.9 18.5 16.0 20.2 ND ND ND ND 68.4 81.5 72.6 ND L-11A 16.9 21.6 17.6 20.2 19.5 18.1 ND ND ND ND 67.7 80.8 75.5 ND L-201 14.4 19.1 15.6 16.0 15.3 17.1 ND ND ND ND 57.7 70.7 64.1 ND L-202 15.6 20.3 17.3 16.9 17.0 17.3 ND ND ND ND 62.6 75.7 68.4 ND L-203 17.6 22.2 19.2 20.2 20.8 20.6 ND ND ND ND 70.2 83.3 80.8 ND L-204 18.7 23.4 19.8 20.7 21.1 20.5 ND ND ND ND 75.0 88.1 82.1 ND L-205-1 18.3 23.0 19.7 20.1 19.0 19.4 ND ND ND ND 73.3 86.4 78.2 ND L-205-3 16.8 21.4 19.8 20.3 19.2 18.8 ND ND ND ND 67.2 80.2 78.1 ND L-206 18.3 22.9 18.8 21.3 20.4 19.2 ND ND ND ND 73.1 86.2 79.7 ND L-207 17.6 22.3 18.5 21.2 19.7 19.0 ND ND ND ND 70.6 83.6 78.4 ND L-208 18.5 23.1 19.8 21.9 22.4 21.8 ND ND ND ND 73.9 87.0 86.0 ND L-209 17.9 22.5 20.6 21.7 20.3 18.5 ND ND ND ND 71.6 84.7 81.0 ND L-210 19.4 24.0 21.1 21.8 21.5 22.9 ND ND ND ND 77.5 90.6 87.2 ND L-211 18.3 23.0 18.3 21.8 21.5 21.0 ND ND ND ND 73.4 86.4 82.6 ND L-212 18.9 23.5 20.1 22.2 20.4 21.7 ND ND ND ND 75.4 88.5 84.4 ND L-213 17.4 22.1 18.9 19.8 18.2 19.7 ND ND ND ND 69.7 82.8 76.6 ND L-214 17.5 22.2 18.7 20.3 19.1 20.2 ND ND ND ND 70.1 83.1 78.3 ND L-215 18.7 23.4 21.0 22.3 21.0 21.9 ND ND ND ND 74.8 87.9 86.1 ND L-216 18.0 22.7 19.8 21.3 19.8 21.5 ND ND ND ND 72.2 85.3 82.4 ND BA +

MDDA (mrem)

Normalized Annual Dose, MA (mrem/yr)

Annual Facility Dose, FA Monitoring Location Location Quarterly

Baseline, BQ (mrem)

BQ +

MDDQ (mrem) 2021 Normalized Net Dose, MQx (mrem/std.

Qtr.)

Quarterly Facility Dose, FQ (mrem)

Annual

Baseline, BA (mrem)

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 70 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 28, Quarterly DLR Results for LaSalle County Station, 2021 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 L-01 18.2 22.9 17.2 19.1 17.9 20.1 ND ND ND ND 72.8 85.9 74.3 ND L-03 17.8 22.4 16.9 17.7 18.8 20.2 ND ND ND ND 71.0 84.1 73.6 ND L-04 16.9 21.6 15.5 17.5 17.9 17.9 ND ND ND ND 67.6 80.7 68.7 ND L-05 17.1 21.8 16.1 17.6 18.4 19.5 ND ND ND ND 68.5 81.6 71.6 ND L-06 17.9 22.6 16.3 18.8 19.7 19.9 ND ND ND ND 71.8 84.8 74.8 ND L-07 17.7 22.3 16.7 17.0 18.6 19.7 ND ND ND ND 70.7 83.8 72.0 ND L-08 16.4 21.1 16.6 17.5 18.9 17.5 ND ND ND ND 65.7 78.7 70.5 ND L-10 15.1 19.8 14.0 15.8 15.1 16.8 ND ND ND ND 60.5 73.5 61.6 ND L-101 18.2 22.9 17.7 17.7 17.8 19.8 ND ND ND ND 72.9 86.0 73.0 ND L-102 19.8 24.4 18.7 18.9 19.7 21.6 ND ND ND ND 79.0 92.1 78.8 ND L-103 17.5 22.2 17.1 17.9 17.9 19.7 ND ND ND ND 70.0 83.1 72.6 ND L-104 17.4 22.1 16.4 17.2 17.2 20.4 ND ND ND ND 69.7 82.8 71.1 ND L-105 19.0 23.7 17.6 18.6 20.2 20.4 ND ND ND ND 76.1 89.2 76.8 ND L-106 17.5 22.1 15.5 18.4 17.5 18.8 ND ND ND ND 69.8 82.9 70.1 ND L-107 18.5 23.1 14.3 18.7 18.7 19.9 ND ND ND ND 74.0 87.1 71.6 ND L-108 18.8 23.4 18.4 18.6 19.2 20.7 ND ND ND ND 75.1 88.2 76.9 ND L-109 17.4 22.0 16.5 18.9 18.2 20.3 ND ND ND ND 69.4 82.5 73.9 ND L-110 18.2 22.8 17.7 18.0 18.8 20.0 ND ND ND ND 72.6 85.7 74.4 ND L-111B 19.0 23.7 16.9 19.7 20.8 21.8 ND ND ND ND 76.1 89.2 79.2 ND L-112 17.8 22.4 15.7 18.9 18.8 19.0 ND ND ND ND 71.0 84.1 72.4 ND L-113A 19.3 23.9 17.9 20.4 19.2 21.4 ND ND ND ND 77.2 90.3 78.8 ND L-114 18.2 22.9 16.5 20.4 19.9 18.8 ND ND ND ND 73.0 86.0 75.5 ND L-115 17.5 22.1 17.0 18.0 17.4 19.9 ND ND ND ND 69.9 83.0 72.3 ND L-116 17.1 21.7 16.1 16.4 17.3 18.9 ND ND ND ND 68.4 81.5 68.6 ND L-11A 16.9 21.6 15.1 16.3 17.7 17.6 ND ND ND ND 67.7 80.8 66.7 ND L-201 14.4 19.1 13.4 15.0 14.3 15.3 ND ND ND ND 57.7 70.7 58.0 ND L-202 15.6 20.3 15.1 17.4 15.5 17.1 ND ND ND ND 62.6 75.7 65.1 ND L-203 17.6 22.2 17.6 17.7 19.0 19.5 ND ND ND ND 70.2 83.3 73.8 ND L-204 18.7 23.4 17.9 19.4 18.9 21.6 ND ND ND ND 75.0 88.1 77.8 ND L-205-1 18.3 23.0 16.3 19.1 19.1 19.9 ND ND ND ND 73.3 86.4 74.3 ND L-205-3 16.8 21.4 16.2 15.2 18.2 18.5 ND ND ND ND 67.2 80.2 68.1 ND L-206 18.3 22.9 16.8 18.2 18.2 19.5 ND ND ND ND 73.1 86.2 72.7 ND L-207 17.6 22.3 16.7 17.9 17.5 19.6 ND ND ND ND 70.6 83.6 71.7 ND L-208 18.5 23.1 16.9 19.6 19.1 20.6 ND ND ND ND 73.9 87.0 76.1 ND L-209 17.9 22.5 16.3 18.2 18.9 19.4 ND ND ND ND 71.6 84.7 72.7 ND L-210 19.4 24.0 18.0 19.7 20.0 20.9 ND ND ND ND 77.5 90.6 78.5 ND L-211 18.3 23.0 17.2 18.8 19.9 19.9 ND ND ND ND 73.4 86.4 75.7 ND L-212 18.9 23.5 19.2 17.8 19.3 20.7 ND ND ND ND 75.4 88.5 76.9 ND L-213 17.4 22.1 16.4 17.9 18.6 19.3 ND ND ND ND 69.7 82.8 72.1 ND L-214 17.5 22.2 16.7 18.0 19.4 19.2 ND ND ND ND 70.1 83.1 73.1 ND L-215 18.7 23.4 18.0 20.0 19.1 20.6 ND ND ND ND 74.8 87.9 77.6 ND L-216 18.0 22.7 17.3 17.8 18.2 20.7 ND ND ND ND 72.2 85.3 73.9 ND BA +

MDDA (mrem)

Normalize d Annual Dose, MA (mrem/yr)

Annual Facility Dose, FA Monitorin g Location Location Quarterly

Baseline, BQ (mrem)

BQ +

MDDQ (mrem) 2021 Normalized Net Dose, MQx (mrem/std.

Qtr.)

Quarterly Facility Dose, FQ (mrem)

Annual

Baseline, BA (mrem)

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 71 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 29, Summary and Conclusion, 2022 Whole Body Thyroid Max Other Organ Gaseous1,2 1.31E-02 1.12E-01 4.64E-02 Liquid 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Sky Shine 7.92E-01 Total Site Dose 8.05E-01 1.12E-01 4.64E-02 Total w/Other Nearby Facility3 8.05E-01 1.12E-01 4.64E-02 Limit 25 mrem 75 mrem 25 mrem

% of Limit 3.22E+00 1.49E-01 1.86E-01 1 Gaseous dose values in Table 2 include organ dose from Noble Gas, Iodine, Tritium, Carbon-14, and particulates with half-lives

> 8 days.

2 Individual groups with the highest dose are used: Total Body: all age groups for Noble Gas and the Child for particulates, Thyroid: the Infant, and Max Other Organ: the Child. Individual age group sum is lower.

3 Other fuel cycle sources within 5 miles of the site do not exist.

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 72 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 30, Listing of Sample Anomalies, 2022 Sample Type Location Code Collection Date(s)

Reason AP/Al L-06 01/06/22 01/12/22 Timer indicates approximately 14.7 hrs. less than expected due to a power outage AP/Al L-06 01/20/22 Timer indicates approximately 27 hrs. less than expected due to a power outage.

NOTE: During the 01/20 collection, the cause of time deficiency was determined to be a faultv timer - timer exchanged SW L-21 01/12/22 01/27/22 No sample collected - river frozen SW L40 01/12/22 01/20/22 01/27/22 02/03/22 02/18/22 No sample collected - river frozen AP/Al L-03 L-05 02/09/22 2 weeks run - Collector unable to access the sampler during 02/03/22 collection due to heavy snow accumulation AP/Al L-04 03/24/22 The timer indicates lower reading of 141.5 hrs. for the 7-day collection period. No power at the station; flow rate estimated based on 03/17 field check; power restored after 2 hrs.

NOTE: During the 03131 collection, the timer indicated 163.0 hrs.

(expected value for the collection period).

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 73 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 31, Quarterly DLR Results for LaSalle County Station, 2022 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 L-01 18.2 22.9 17.1 17.3 17.8 19.1 ND ND ND ND 72.8 85.9 71.3 ND L-03 17.8 22.4 17.0 15.8 16.6 19.2 ND ND ND ND 71.0 84.1 68.4 ND L-04 16.9 21.6 15.7 16.4 16.9 17.6 ND ND ND ND 67.6 80.7 66.6 ND L-05 17.1 21.8 16.4 15.7 15.5 17.8 ND ND ND ND 68.5 81.6 65.4 ND L-06 17.9 22.6 16.5 18.1 17.1 17.2 ND ND ND ND 71.8 84.8 68.8 ND L-07 17.7 22.3 17.7 17.9 17.1 16.7 ND ND ND ND 70.7 83.8 69.4 ND L-08 16.4 21.1 15.2 14.7 15.1 16.0 ND ND ND ND 65.7 78.7 60.9 ND L-10 15.1 19.8 15.6 15.2 15.5 13.0 ND ND ND ND 60.5 73.5 59.3 ND L-101 18.2 22.9 18.2 18.6 17.5 18.6 ND ND ND ND 72.9 86.0 72.8 ND L-102 19.8 24.4 18.9 20.0 20.5 19.8 ND ND ND ND 79.0 92.1 79.2 ND L-103 17.5 22.2 16.3 17.2 16.9 17.1 ND ND ND ND 70.0 83.1 67.5 ND L-104 17.4 22.1 16.3 17.5 18.0 16.6 ND ND ND ND 69.7 82.8 68.3 ND L-105 19.0 23.7 17.9 19.4 19.0 19.2 ND ND ND ND 76.1 89.2 75.5 ND L-106 17.5 22.1 16.7 17.3 17.5 18.1 ND ND ND ND 69.8 82.9 69.5 ND L-107 18.5 23.1 18.3 18.0 20.0 20.2 ND ND ND ND 74.0 87.1 76.4 ND L-108 18.8 23.4 19.8 16.8 18.4 18.4 ND ND ND ND 75.1 88.2 73.3 ND L-109 17.4 22.0 15.9 17.5 15.5 16.1 ND ND ND ND 69.4 82.5 65.0 ND L-110 18.2 22.8 17.9 17.9 16.5 18.7 ND ND ND ND 72.6 85.7 70.9 ND L-111B 19.0 23.7 17.8 19.1 19.1 17.1 ND ND ND ND 76.1 89.2 73.1 ND L-112 17.8 22.4 16.5 17.8 18.0 17.5 ND ND ND ND 71.0 84.1 69.7 ND L-113A 19.3 23.9 17.5 18.7 20.2 19.2 ND ND ND ND 77.2 90.3 75.6 ND L-114 18.2 22.9 17.6 17.6 17.3 17.9 ND ND ND ND 73.0 86.0 70.4 ND L-115 17.5 22.1 16.0 16.1 16.5 19.0 ND ND ND ND 69.9 83.0 67.5 ND L-116 17.1 21.7 16.8 16.5 17.4 17.5 ND ND ND ND 68.4 81.5 68.1 ND L-11A 16.9 21.6 17.5 16.5 17.7 17.1 ND ND ND ND 67.7 80.8 68.7 ND L-201 14.4 19.1 13.9 13.6 14.5 15.4 ND ND ND ND 57.7 70.7 57.4 ND L-202 15.6 20.3 13.4 15.0 15.1 16.7 ND ND ND ND 62.6 75.7 60.1 ND L-203 17.6 22.2 15.6 17.2 16.7 17.2 ND ND ND ND 70.2 83.3 66.7 ND L-204 18.7 23.4 18.8 17.9 16.2 19.4 ND ND ND ND 75.0 88.1 72.2 ND L-205-1 18.3 23.0 17.9 17.6 18.9 18.0 ND ND ND ND 73.3 86.4 72.3 ND L-205-3 16.8 21.4 16.1 16.4 15.7 18.2 ND ND ND ND 67.2 80.2 66.3 ND L-206 18.3 22.9 18.8 19.1 16.5 19.2 ND ND ND ND 73.1 86.2 73.5 ND L-207 17.6 22.3 17.1 17.5 17.5 17.4 ND ND ND ND 70.6 83.6 69.4 ND L-208 18.5 23.1 17.6 19.0 16.5 18.6 ND ND ND ND 73.9 87.0 71.7 ND L-209 17.9 22.5 17.1 17.3 17.8 18.4 ND ND ND ND 71.6 84.7 70.5 ND L-210 19.4 24.0 17.2 19.6 20.1 19.7 ND ND ND ND 77.5 90.6 76.5 ND L-211 18.3 23.0 18.0 17.8 18.5 16.6 ND ND ND ND 73.4 86.4 71.0 ND L-212 18.9 23.5 17.9 18.8 17.9 19.4 ND ND ND ND 75.4 88.5 73.9 ND L-213 17.4 22.1 17.0 16.3 17.3 16.8 ND ND ND ND 69.7 82.8 67.4 ND L-214 17.5 22.2 16.2 18.4 15.5 16.9 ND ND ND ND 70.1 83.1 67.0 ND L-215 18.7 23.4 17.7 18.8 16.7 18.9 ND ND ND ND 74.8 87.9 72.1 ND L-216 18.0 22.7 16.5 17.3 18.2 18.6 ND ND ND ND 72.2 85.3 70.5 ND Monitoring Location Location Quarterly

Baseline, BQ (mrem)

BQ +

MDDQ (mrem)

Normalized Net Dose, MQx (mrem/std.

Qtr.)

Quarterly Facility Dose, FQ (mrem)

Annual

Baseline, BA (mrem)

BA +

MDDA (mrem)

Normalized Annual Dose, MA (mrem/yr)

Annual Facility Dose, FA

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report YEAR: 2024 Page 74 of 74 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 32, Summary and Conclusions, 2023 Whole Body Thyroid Max Other Organ Gaseous1,2 1.27E-02 5.70E-02 4.71E-02 Liquid 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Sky Shine 1.95E-01 Total Site Dose 2.08E-01 5.70E-02 4.71E-02 Total w/Other Nearby Facility3 2.08E-01 5.70E-02 4.71E-02 Limit 25 mrem 75 mrem 25 mrem

% of Limit 8.31E-01 7.60E-02 1.88E-01 1 Gaseous dose values include organ dose from Noble Gas, Iodine, Tritium, Carbon-14 and particulates with half-lives

> 8 days 2 Individual groups with the highest dose are used: Total Body: all age groups for Noble Gas; the Infant & Child for particulates Individual age group sum is lower 3 Other fuel cycle sources within 5 miles of the site do not exist

Intentionally left blank

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 0 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 2024 Document Number: 0CAN10001 Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 1 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS................................................................................ 2 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 About Nuclear Power...................................................................................................... 4 2.2 About Radiation Dose..................................................................................................... 6 2.3 About Dose Calculation.................................................................................................. 8 NEI 07-07 ONSITE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM............... 10 3.1 Voluntary Notification.................................................................................................... 16 BIBLIOGRAPHY...................................................................................................................... 17 TABLES Table 1, Groundwater Protection Program Monitoring Well Sampling Locations.................................. 10 Table 2, Groundwater Protection Monitoring Well Tritium and Strontium in Ground Water Samples (pCi/L +/- 2 sigma)................................................................................................................................. 12 Table 3, Groundwater Protection Program Monitoring Well Gamma Isotopic in Groundwater Samples (pCi/L +/- 2 sigma)................................................................................................................................. 14 Table 4, Groundwater Protection Program Monitoring Well Hard-To-Detects in Groundwater Samples (pCi/L +/- 2 sigma)................................................................................................................................. 15 FIGURES Figure 1, Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) [1]..................................................................................... 4 Figure 2, Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) [2]............................................................................................. 5 Figure 3, Sources of Radiation Exposure (NCRP Report No. 160) [3].................................................... 6 Figure 4, Potential exposure pathways to Members of the Public due to Plant Operations [6]............... 8 Figure 5, Ground Water and Surface Water Locations LaSalle County Station, 2024.......................... 11

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 2 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS

1.

Alpha Particle (): A charged particle emitted from the nucleus of an atom having a mass and charge equal in magnitude of a helium nucleus.

2.

BWR: Boiling Water Reactor

3.

Composite Sample: A series of single collected portions (aliquots) analyzed as one sample. The aliquots making up the sample are collected at time intervals that are very short compared to the composite period.

4.

Control: A sampling station in a location not likely to be affected by plant effluents due to its distance and/or direction from the Plant.

5.

Counting Error: An estimate of the two-sigma uncertainty associated with the sample results based on total counts accumulated.

6.

Curie (Ci): A measure of radioactivity; equal to 3.7 x 1010 disintegrations per second, or 2.22 x 1012 disintegrations per minute.

7.

Direct Radiation Monitoring: The measurement of radiation dose at various distances from the plant is assessed using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs), and/or pressurized ionization chambers.

8.

Grab Sample: A single discrete sample drawn at one point in time.

9.

Indicator: A sampling location that is potentially affected by plant effluents due to its proximity and/or direction from the plant.

10.

Ingestion Pathway: The ingestion pathway includes milk, fish, drinking water and garden produce. Also sampled (under special circumstances) are other media such as vegetation or animal products when additional information about particular radionuclides is needed.

11.

ISFSI: Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation

12.

LLD: Lower Limit of Detection. An a priori measure of the detection capability of a radiochemistry measurement based on instrument setup, calibration, background, decay time, and sample volume. An LLD is expressed as an activity concentration. The MDA is used for reporting results. LLD are specified by a regulator, such as the NRC and are typically listed in the ODCM.

13.

MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity. For radiochemistry instruments, the MDA is the a posteriori minimum concentration that a counting system detects. The smallest concentration or activity of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above instrument background and that is detected with 95%

probability, with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a true signal.

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 3 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

14.

MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration. Essentially synonymous with MDA for the purposes of radiological monitoring.

15.

Mean: The sum of all of the values in a distribution divided by the number of values in the distribution, synonymous with average.

16.

Microcurie (µCi): 3.7 x 104 disintegrations per second, or 2.22 x106 disintegrations per minute.

17.

millirem (mrem): 1/1000 rem; a unit of radiation dose equivalent in tissue.

18.

Milliroentgen (mR): 1/1000 Roentgen; a unit of exposure to X-or gamma radiation.

19.

N/A: Not Applicable

20.

NEI: Nuclear Energy Institute

21.

NRC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission

22.

ODCM: Offsite Dose Calculation Manual

23.

OSLD: Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter

24.

Protected Area: A 10 CFR 73 security term is an area encompassed by physical barriers and to which access is controlled for security purposes. The fenced area immediately surrounding the plant and around ISFSI are commonly classified by the licensee as Protected areas. Access to the protected area requires a security badge or escort.

25.

PWR: Pressurized Water Reactor

26.

REC: Radiological Effluent Control

27.

REMP: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program

28.

Restricted Area: A 10 CFRR 20 defined term where access to which is limited by the licensee for the purpose of protecting individuals against undue risks from exposure to radiation and radioactive materials.

29.

TEDE: Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) means the sum of the effective dose equivalent (for external exposures) and the committed effective dose equivalent (for internal exposures).

30.

TLD: Thermoluminescent Dosimeter

31.

TRM: Technical Requirements Manual

32.

TS: Technical Specification

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 4 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2

33.

Unrestricted Area: An area, access to which is neither limited nor controlled by the licensee.

INTRODUCTION 2.1 About Nuclear Power Commercial nuclear power plants are generally classified as either Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs) or Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs), based on their design. A BWR includes a single coolant system where water used as reactor coolant boils as it passes through the core and the steam generated is used to turn the turbine generator for power production. A PWR, in contrast, includes two separate water systems: radioactive reactor coolant and a secondary system. Reactor coolant is maintained under high pressure, preventing boiling. The high-pressure coolant is passed through a heat exchanger called a steam generator where the secondary system water is boiled, and the steam is used to turn the turbine generator for power production.

Figure 1, Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) [1]

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 5 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 2.1 Figure 2, Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) [2]

Electricity is generated by a nuclear power plant similarly to the way that electricity is generated at other conventional types of power plants, such as those powered by coal or natural gas. Water is boiled to generate steam; the steam turns a turbine that is attached to a generator and the steam is condensed back into water to be returned to the boiler. What makes nuclear power different from these other types of power plants is that the heat is generated by fission and decay reactions occurring within and around the core containing fissionable uranium (U-235).

Nuclear fission occurs when certain nuclides (primarily U-233, U-235, or Pu-239) absorb a neutron and break into several smaller nuclides (called fission products) as well as producing some additional neutrons.

Fission results in production of radioactive materials including gases and solids that must be contained to prevent release or treated prior to release. These effluents are generally treated by filtration and/or hold-up prior to release. Releases are generally monitored by sampling and by continuously indicating radiation monitors. The effluent release data is used to calculate doses in order to ensure that dose to the public due to plant operation remains within required limits.

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 6 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 2.2 About Radiation Dose Ionizing radiation, including alpha, beta, and gamma radiation from radioactive decay, has enough energy to break chemical bonds in tissues and result in damage to tissue or genetic material. The amount of ionization that will be generated by a given exposure to ionizing radiation is quantified as dose. Radiation dose is generally reported in units of millirem (mrem) in the US.

Figure 3, Sources of Radiation Exposure (NCRP Report No. 160) [3]

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 7 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 The National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) has evaluated the population dose for the US and determined that the average individual is exposed to approximately 620 mrem per year [3]. There are many sources for radiation dose, ranging from natural background sources to medical procedures, air travel, and industrial processes. Approximately half (310 mrem) of the average exposure is due to natural sources of radiation including exposure to radon, cosmic radiation, and internal radiation and terrestrial due to naturally occurring radionuclides. The remaining 310 mrem of exposure is due to man-made sources of exposure, with the most significant contributors being medical (48% of total mrem per year) due to radiation used in various types of medical scans and treatments. Of the remaining 2%

of dose, most is due to consumer activities such as air travel, smoking cigarettes, and building materials. A small fraction of this 2% is due to industrial activities including generation of nuclear power.

Readers that are curious about common sources and effects of radiation dose that they may encounter can find excellent sources of information from the Health Physics Society, including the Radiation Fact Sheets [4], and from the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission website [5].

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 8 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 2.3 About Dose Calculation Concentrations of radioactive material in the environment resulting from plant operations are very small and it is not possible to determine doses directly using measured activities of environmental samples. To overcome this, dose calculations based on measured activities of effluent streams are used to model the dose impact for Members of the Public due to plant operation and effluents. There are several mechanisms that can result in dose to Members of the Public, including: Ingestion of radionuclides in food or water; Inhalation of radionuclides in air; Immersion in a plume of noble gases; and Direct Radiation from the ground, the plant or from an elevated plume.

Figure 4, Potential exposure pathways to Members of the Public due to Plant Operations [6]

Each plant has an Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) that specifies the methodology used to obtain the doses in the Dose Assessment section of this report.

The dose assessment methodology in the ODCM is based on NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109 [7] and NUREG-0133 [8]. Doses are calculated by determining what the nuclide concentration will be in air, water, on the ground, or in food products based on plant effluent releases. Release points are continuously monitored to quantify what concentrations of nuclides are being released. For gaseous releases meteorological data is used to determine how much of the released activity will be present at a given location outside of the plant either deposited onto the ground or in gaseous form.

Intake patterns and nuclide bio-concentration factors are used to determine how much activity will be transferred into animal milk or meat. Finally, human ingestion factors and dose factors are used to determine how much activity will be consumed and how much dose the consumer will receive. Inhalation dose is calculated by determining the concentration of nuclides and how much air is breathed by the individual.

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 9 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 For liquid releases, dilution and mixing factors are used to model the environmental concentrations in water. Drinking water pathways are modeled by determining the concentration of nuclides in the water at the point where the drinking water is sourced (e.g., taken from wells, rivers, or lakes). Fish and invertebrate pathways are determined by using concentration at the release point, bioaccumulation factors for the fish or invertebrate and an estimate of the quantity of fish consumed.

Each year a Land Use Census is performed to determine what potential dose pathways currently exist within a five-mile radius around the plant, the area most affected by plant operations. The Annual Land Use Census identifies the locations of vegetable gardens, nearest residences, milk animals and meat animals. The data from the census is used to determine who is the likely to be most exposed to radiation dose as a result of plant operation.

There is significant uncertainty in dose calculation results, due to modeling dispersion of material released and bioaccumulation factors, as well as assumptions associated with consumption and land-use patterns. Even with these sources of uncertainty, the calculations do provide a reasonable estimate of the order of magnitude of the exposure. Conservative assumptions are made in the calculation inputs such as the number of various foods and water consumed, the amount of air inhaled, and the amount of direct radiation exposure from the ground or plume, such that the actual dose received are likely lower than the calculated dose. Even with the built-in conservatism, doses calculated for the maximum exposed individual due to plant operation are a very small fraction of the annual dose that is received due to other sources. The calculated doses due to plant effluents, along with REMP results, serve to provide assurance that radioactive effluents releases are not exceeding safety standards for the environment or people living near the plant.

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 10 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 NEI 07-07 ONSITE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 has developed a Groundwater Protection Initiative (GPI) program in accordance with NEI 07-07, Industry Ground Water Protection Initiative - Final Guidance Document [9]. The purpose of the GPI is to ensure timely detection and an effective response to situations involving inadvertent radiological releases to groundwater in order to prevent migration of licensed radioactive material off-site and to quantify impacts on decommissioning. During 2024, LaSalle Station collected and analyzed groundwater samples in accordance with the requirements of approved procedures following regulatory methods.

This section is included in this report to communicate results of NEI 07-07 Radiological Groundwater Monitoring Program. Monitoring wells installed as part of GPI program are sampled and analyzed as summarized in Table 1, Groundwater Protection Program Monitoring Well Sampling Locations. In addition to reporting results from NEI 07-07 monitoring wells, voluntary communications to offsite governmental agencies for onsite leaks or spills per NEI 07-07 Objective 2.2, are also reported as part of this report. It is important to note, samples and results taken in support of NEI 07-07 groundwater monitoring program are not part of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) but should be reported as part of ARERR.

Table 1, Groundwater Protection Program Monitoring Well Sampling Locations Site Site Type HP-2 Monitoring Well HP-5 Monitoring Well HP-7 Monitoring Well HP-10 Monitoring Well MW-LS-104S Monitoring Well MW-LS-105S Monitoring Well MW-LS-106S Monitoring Well MW-LS-107S Monitoring Well MW-LS-111S Monitoring Well RW-LS-100S Extraction Well TW-LS-114S Monitoring Well TW-LS-116S Monitoring Well TW-LS-117S Monitoring Well TW-LS-118S Monitoring Well TW-LS-119S Monitoring Well TW-LS-120S Monitoring Well TW-LS-121S Monitoring Well

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 11 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 MAP OF COLLECTION SITES Figure 5, Ground Water and Surface Water Locations LaSalle County Station, 2024

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 12 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Radiological Groundwater Monitoring Program tritium results are summarized in Table 2, Groundwater Protection Monitoring Well Tritium and Strontium in Ground Water Samples (pCi/L +/- 2 sigma). No groundwater monitoring locations had detectable gamma or HTD in 2024 Table 2, Groundwater Protection Monitoring Well Tritium and Strontium in Ground Water Samples (pCi/L +/- 2 sigma)

Site Collection Date H-3 Sr-89 Sr-90 HP-10 5/10/2024

< 164 HP-2 5/10/2024

< 164 HP-5 5/10/2024

< 166 HP-7 1/31/2024

< 198 HP-7 5/10/2024

< 166

< 8

< 0.8 HP-7 9/4/2024

< 192 HP-7 10/30/2024

< 194 MW-LS-104S 1/31/2024 735

+/- 159 MW-LS-104S 5/10/2024 611

+/- 144

< 9

< 1 MW-LS-104S 8/30/2024 1020

+/- 181 MW-LS-104S 10/30/2024 1330

+/- 209 MW-LS-105S 1/31/2024

< 189 MW-LS-105S 5/10/2024

< 166

< 8

< 0.7 MW-LS-105S 9/4/2024

< 191 MW-LS-105S 10/30/2024

< 197 MW-LS-106S 5/10/2024

< 164 MW-LS-107S 1/31/2024

< 198 MW-LS-107S 5/10/2024

< 167

< 9

< 0.8 MW-LS-107S 9/4/2024

< 195 MW-LS-107S 10/30/2024

< 197 MW-LS-111S 5/10/2024

< 164 RW-LS-100S 1/31/2024 285

+/- 131 RW-LS-100S 5/10/2024

< 192

< 7

< 0.8 RW-LS-100S 8/30/2024

< 191 RW-LS-100S 10/30/2024

< 190 TW-LS-114S 1/31/2024

< 197 TW-LS-114S 8/30/2024

< 194 TW-LS-116S 1/31/2024 2900

+/- 362 TW-LS-116S 5/10/2024 2610

+/- 330

< 8

< 0.9 TW-LS-116S 8/30/2024 3700

+/- 438 TW-LS-116S 10/30/2024 2660

+/- 334 TW-LS-117S 1/31/2024 194

+/- 125 TW-LS-117S 5/10/2024

< 187

< 6

< 0.7 TW-LS-117S 8/30/2024

< 194 TW-LS-117S 10/30/2024

< 196

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 13 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 2, Groundwater Protection Monitoring Well Tritium and Strontium in Ground Water Samples (pCi/L +/- 2 sigma) Contd Site Collection Date H-3 Sr-89 Sr-90 TW-LS-118S 1/31/2024 3540 +/-

430 TW-LS-118S 8/30/2024 2550 +/-

325 TW-LS-119S 5/10/2024 191 TW-LS-120S 1/31/2024 197 TW-LS-120S 5/10/2024 193

< 8

< 0.8 TW-LS-120S 9/4/2024 193 TW-LS-120S 10/30/2024 197 TW-LS-121S 1/31/2024 1450 +/-

221 TW-LS-121S 5/10/2024 194 TW-LS-121S 8/30/2024 192

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 14 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 3, Groundwater Protection Program Monitoring Well Gamma Isotopic in Groundwater Samples (pCi/L +/- 2 sigma)

Site Collection Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-96 Zr-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 No Groundwater Samples Analyzed for Gamma Isotopic in 2024

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 15 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Table 4, Groundwater Protection Program Monitoring Well Hard-To-Detects in Groundwater Samples (pCi/L +/- 2 sigma)

No Groundwater Samples Analyzed for Hard-To-Detects in 2024

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 16 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 3.1 Voluntary Notification During 2024, LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 did not make a voluntary NEI 07-07 notification to State/Local officials, NRC, and to other stakeholders required by site procedures.

Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report YEAR: 2024 Page 17 of 17 Company: Constellation Plant: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 30 June 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/students/animated-pwr.html. [Accessed October 2020].

[2] Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 25 June 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/students/animated-bwr.html. [Accessed October 2020].

[3] "NCRP Report No. 160 - Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States,"

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, 2009.

[4] Health Physics Society, [Online]. Available: http://hps.org/hpspublications/radiationfactsheets.html.

[Accessed 2020].

[5] "NRC Resource Page," [Online]. Available: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/radiation.html. [Accessed 10 November 2020].

[6] "Japan Atomic Energy Agency," 06 November 2020. [Online]. Available:

https://www.jaea.go.jp/english/04/ntokai/houkan/houkan_02.html.

[7] "Regulatory Guide 1.109 - Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Demonstrating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Ocotober, 1977.

[8] "NUREG-0133 - Preparation of Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants,"

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1987.

[9] "NEI 07 Industry Ground Water Protection Initiative Final Guidance Document, Rev. 1,"

Nuclear Energy Institute, Washington, D.C., 2019.