|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20204G6521999-03-18018 March 1999 Comments Re PRM 50-64.Urges Commission to Delete Paragraph Containing Joint & Several Liability Clause as Contained in Final Policy Statement 3F1298-06, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps.Expresses Concern Re Absence of Definition of risk-significant Configurations & Unacceptable Level for Safety Function Degradation1998-12-0909 December 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps.Expresses Concern Re Absence of Definition of risk-significant Configurations & Unacceptable Level for Safety Function Degradation 3F1098-09, Comment Re Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial Npps.Recommends That Assessment Process Be Reviewed with Consideration of Enforcement Process,Insp Process & Reporting Process1998-10-0505 October 1998 Comment Re Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial Npps.Recommends That Assessment Process Be Reviewed with Consideration of Enforcement Process,Insp Process & Reporting Process ML20199E0821998-01-23023 January 1998 Comment Supporting PRM 50-63A Re Emergency Plan for CR3 to Include Mandatory Stockpiling of Ki for Distribution to General Public in Event of Severe Accident ML20137E5171997-03-24024 March 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-licensed Activities (Effective Immediately) ML20134H3201996-12-0101 December 1996 Transcript of 941201 Interview of RP Weiss in Crystal River, Fl.Pp 1-12 ML20199C7791996-09-19019 September 1996 Transcript of 960919 Interview of C Smith in Crystal River, Florida Re OI Rept 2-96-033.Pp 1-16.W/Certificate of Svc. Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20199C8521996-09-19019 September 1996 Transcript of 960919 Interview of R De Montfort in Crystal River,Florida Re OI Rept 2-96-033.Pp 1-15.W/Certificate of Svc.Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20199C8181996-09-18018 September 1996 Transcript of 960918 Interview of J Weaver in Crystal River, Florida Re OI Rept 2-96-033.Pp 1-31.W/Certificate of Svc. Date of College Graduation Deleted ML20199C8031996-09-18018 September 1996 Transcript of 960918 Interview of J Atkinson in Crystal River,Florida Re OI Rept 2-96-033.Pp 1-21.W/Certificate of Svc.Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20199C8271996-09-18018 September 1996 Transcript of 960918 Interview of M Culver in Crystal River, Florida Re OI Rept 2-96-033.Pp 1-34.W/Certificate of Svc. Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20199C7471996-09-18018 September 1996 Transcript of 960918 Interview of D Jones in Crystal River, Florida Re OI Rept 2-96-033.Pp 1-30.Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20134H5901996-04-0404 April 1996 Partially Deleted Transcript of 960404 Enforcement Conference Proceedings Before Ebneter in Atlanta,Ga. Pp 1-240 ML20134H5791996-03-28028 March 1996 Partially Deleted 960328 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Between NRC & R Weiss Before L Reyes in Atlanta, Ga.Pp 1-92 ML20134H5821996-03-28028 March 1996 Partially Deleted Transcript of 960328 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Between NRC & DA Fields in Atlanta, Ga.Pp 1-86 IA-97-313, Transcript of 951130 Interview of P Hinman in Crystal River, Florida Re OI Rept 2-94-036.Pp 1-146.W/Certificate of Svc. Title Page Encl.Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted1995-11-30030 November 1995 Transcript of 951130 Interview of P Hinman in Crystal River, Florida Re OI Rept 2-94-036.Pp 1-146.W/Certificate of Svc. Title Page Encl.Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20248J6091995-11-30030 November 1995 Transcript of 951130 Interview of P Hinman in Crystal River, Florida Re OI Rept 2-94-036.Pp 1-146.W/Certificate of Svc. Title Page Encl.Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20203B8041995-11-30030 November 1995 Transcript of 951130 Interview of G Halnon in Crystal River, Fl Re Safety Culture & Attitudes of People,Shift Supervisors & Detailed Sys Questions on Makeup Sys.Pp 1-34.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20199C9891995-11-30030 November 1995 Transcript of 951130 Interview of B Hickle in Crystal River, Florida Re OI Rept 2-94-036.Pp 1-134.Title Page Encl.Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20199C9811995-11-29029 November 1995 Transcript of 951129 Interview of P Saltsman in Crystal River,Florida Re OI Rept 2-94-036.Pp 1-98.W/Certificate of Svc.Title Page Encl.Pages 96-97 Missing.Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20199C9661995-11-29029 November 1995 Transcript of 951129 Interview of G Halnon in Crystal River, Florida Re OI Rept 2-94-036.Pp 1-134.W/Certificate of Svc. Title Page Encl.Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20199C9421995-11-29029 November 1995 Transcript of 951129 Interview of C Bergstrom in Crystal River,Florida Re OI Rept 2-94-036.Pp 1-96.Title Page Encl. Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20199C9611995-11-29029 November 1995 Transcript of 951129 Interview of D Czufin in Crystal River, Florida Re OI Rept 2-94-036.Pp 1-38.W/Certificate of Svc. Title Page Encl.Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20199C9291995-11-28028 November 1995 Transcript of 951128 Interview of P Fleming in Crystal River,Florida Re OI Rept 2-94-036.Pp 1-58.Title Page Encl. Birth Date & Social Security Deleted ML20199C8891995-11-28028 November 1995 Transcript of 951128 Interview of P Beard in Crystal River, Florida Re OI Rept 2-94-036.Pp 1-97.W/Certificate of Svc. Title Page Encl.Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20199C9121995-11-28028 November 1995 Transcript of 951128 Interview of G Boldt in Crystal River, Florida Re OI Rept 2-94-036.Pp 1-86.Title Page Encl.Birth Date & Social Security Number Deleted ML20098B2801995-09-27027 September 1995 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-61 Re Proposed App as Improvement Over Existing App R on Basis That It Allows Utilities to Apply Fire Protection Resources in Proportion to Safety Significance of Plant Areas ML20091S0531995-08-31031 August 1995 Comment on Review of Revised NRC SALP Program.Use of Numerical Scores Has Proven to Be Punitive from Economic Perspective ML20087L9681995-08-22022 August 1995 Withdrawal of Motion to Quash Subpoena.* Informs That D Fields Withdrew Previously Filed Motion to Quash Subpoena. W/Certificate of Svc ML20087L9631995-08-22022 August 1995 Withdrawal of Motion to Quash Subpoena.* Informs That RP Weiss Withdraws Previously Filed Motion to Quash Subpoena. W/Certificate of Svc ML20087K3331995-08-17017 August 1995 Motion to Quash Subpoena.* D Fields Moves That Subpoena Served by Wj Mcnulty Be Quashed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20087K3441995-08-17017 August 1995 Motion to Quash Subpoena.* RP Weiss Moves That Subpoena Served by Wj Mcnulty Be Quashed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20129E8331995-08-0808 August 1995 Partially Withheld Transcript of 950808 Interview of M Van Sicklen in Crystal River,Fl.Pp 1-85 IA-96-330, Partially Withheld Transcript of Interview of C Smith in Crystal River,Fl.Pp 1-331995-08-0808 August 1995 Partially Withheld Transcript of Interview of C Smith in Crystal River,Fl.Pp 1-33 ML20129G4551995-08-0808 August 1995 Partially Withheld Transcript of Interview of C Smith in Crystal River,Fl.Pp 1-33 ML20129G4461995-08-0808 August 1995 Transcript of 950808 Interview of Jt Atkinson in Crystal River,Fl.Pp 1-26 NL-95-0061, Comment on Draft GL Re Testing of safety-related Circuits. Util Primary Concern W/Requested Actions of Proposed GL Is Schedule1995-07-18018 July 1995 Comment on Draft GL Re Testing of safety-related Circuits. Util Primary Concern W/Requested Actions of Proposed GL Is Schedule NL-95-0053, Comment on Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style. Insp Repts Frequently Not Appropriately Focused on Safety Issues1995-06-29029 June 1995 Comment on Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style. Insp Repts Frequently Not Appropriately Focused on Safety Issues ML20083N4611995-05-0505 May 1995 Comment Re Proposed GL Concerning Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety Related Power Operated Valves.Tis to Insp Personnel,Surveys or Other Means Could Confirm That SR Power Operated Valves Capable of Performing Safety Function ML20077M6791994-12-29029 December 1994 Comments Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operation for Nuclear Power Reactor ML20077E8231994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule ML20134H3141994-12-0101 December 1994 Transcript of 941201 Interview of D Fields in Cystal River, Fl.Pp 1-40 ML20203B6801994-12-0101 December 1994 Transcript of 941201 Interview of Gh Halnon in Crystal River,Fl Re Problem W/Curve of make-up Tank That Occurred on 940905.Pp 1-18.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20064G1491994-03-0808 March 1994 Comments on Whistleblower Protection Issue.Lists Violations Identified ML20067C1491994-02-15015 February 1994 Comment on Draft NUREG-5884 Re Revised Analyses of Decommissioning for Ref Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station ML20056G9831993-08-27027 August 1993 Comment on Whistleblower Protection Issue 3F0492-15, Comment Concurring W/Comments Offered by NUMARC on Sections 7 & 8 of Draft NUREG-1449, Shutdown & Low-Power Operation at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants in Us. Urges NRC to Consider Comments Carefully1992-04-30030 April 1992 Comment Concurring W/Comments Offered by NUMARC on Sections 7 & 8 of Draft NUREG-1449, Shutdown & Low-Power Operation at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants in Us. Urges NRC to Consider Comments Carefully ML20094E1141991-12-19019 December 1991 Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-8005, Assessing External Radiation Dose from Airborne Radioactive Matls. Reg Guide Provides Minimal New Info to Nuclear Industry & Would Probably Be Best Combined W/Some Other Reg Guide ML20127E4551991-11-0303 November 1991 Directors Decision DD-91-6 Denying Proceeding Per Stated 10CFR Part to Suspend or Revoke Operating License of Util ML20024H4281991-05-24024 May 1991 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. 1999-03-18
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20204G6521999-03-18018 March 1999 Comments Re PRM 50-64.Urges Commission to Delete Paragraph Containing Joint & Several Liability Clause as Contained in Final Policy Statement 3F1298-06, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps.Expresses Concern Re Absence of Definition of risk-significant Configurations & Unacceptable Level for Safety Function Degradation1998-12-0909 December 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps.Expresses Concern Re Absence of Definition of risk-significant Configurations & Unacceptable Level for Safety Function Degradation 3F1098-09, Comment Re Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial Npps.Recommends That Assessment Process Be Reviewed with Consideration of Enforcement Process,Insp Process & Reporting Process1998-10-0505 October 1998 Comment Re Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial Npps.Recommends That Assessment Process Be Reviewed with Consideration of Enforcement Process,Insp Process & Reporting Process ML20199E0821998-01-23023 January 1998 Comment Supporting PRM 50-63A Re Emergency Plan for CR3 to Include Mandatory Stockpiling of Ki for Distribution to General Public in Event of Severe Accident ML20098B2801995-09-27027 September 1995 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-61 Re Proposed App as Improvement Over Existing App R on Basis That It Allows Utilities to Apply Fire Protection Resources in Proportion to Safety Significance of Plant Areas ML20091S0531995-08-31031 August 1995 Comment on Review of Revised NRC SALP Program.Use of Numerical Scores Has Proven to Be Punitive from Economic Perspective NL-95-0061, Comment on Draft GL Re Testing of safety-related Circuits. Util Primary Concern W/Requested Actions of Proposed GL Is Schedule1995-07-18018 July 1995 Comment on Draft GL Re Testing of safety-related Circuits. Util Primary Concern W/Requested Actions of Proposed GL Is Schedule NL-95-0053, Comment on Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style. Insp Repts Frequently Not Appropriately Focused on Safety Issues1995-06-29029 June 1995 Comment on Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style. Insp Repts Frequently Not Appropriately Focused on Safety Issues ML20083N4611995-05-0505 May 1995 Comment Re Proposed GL Concerning Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety Related Power Operated Valves.Tis to Insp Personnel,Surveys or Other Means Could Confirm That SR Power Operated Valves Capable of Performing Safety Function ML20077M6791994-12-29029 December 1994 Comments Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operation for Nuclear Power Reactor ML20077E8231994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule ML20064G1491994-03-0808 March 1994 Comments on Whistleblower Protection Issue.Lists Violations Identified ML20067C1491994-02-15015 February 1994 Comment on Draft NUREG-5884 Re Revised Analyses of Decommissioning for Ref Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station ML20056G9831993-08-27027 August 1993 Comment on Whistleblower Protection Issue 3F0492-15, Comment Concurring W/Comments Offered by NUMARC on Sections 7 & 8 of Draft NUREG-1449, Shutdown & Low-Power Operation at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants in Us. Urges NRC to Consider Comments Carefully1992-04-30030 April 1992 Comment Concurring W/Comments Offered by NUMARC on Sections 7 & 8 of Draft NUREG-1449, Shutdown & Low-Power Operation at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants in Us. Urges NRC to Consider Comments Carefully ML20094E1141991-12-19019 December 1991 Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-8005, Assessing External Radiation Dose from Airborne Radioactive Matls. Reg Guide Provides Minimal New Info to Nuclear Industry & Would Probably Be Best Combined W/Some Other Reg Guide ML20024H4281991-05-24024 May 1991 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. ML19324B8701989-10-27027 October 1989 Comments on 54FR40221 Re Licensee Application for Amend to License DPR-72,eliminating Need to Test Diesel Generator in 30-minute Rating.Application Objection Expressed 3F0289-18, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Industry Actions in Maint Area Effective W/Continuing Improvement Across Industry.Balance of Plant Equipment Inappropriate1989-02-28028 February 1989 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Industry Actions in Maint Area Effective W/Continuing Improvement Across Industry.Balance of Plant Equipment Inappropriate 3F1288-02, Requests That Comment Period Be Extended from 60 Days to 120 Days on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint in Nuclear Power Plants1988-12-0202 December 1988 Requests That Comment Period Be Extended from 60 Days to 120 Days on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint in Nuclear Power Plants 3F1287-24, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Formal Tech Spec Amends Should Not Be Required to Implement Changes & No 10CFR170 Fees Should Be Incurred1987-12-22022 December 1987 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Formal Tech Spec Amends Should Not Be Required to Implement Changes & No 10CFR170 Fees Should Be Incurred ML20236A0441987-10-13013 October 1987 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Proposed Rule Devoid of Objective Guidance or Criteria for Distinguishing Between Cases Where cost-benefit Analysis Permissible & Where Not 1999-03-18
[Table view] |
Text
,Osoq M l
- L. Coblent 2-IcbFR26\ 60
-s , " E D 5/30/95
@,* m c -6 ra 3: 22 @
RULE 3 m.iu,a - "
U 51.. :.v Florida Power CORPORATION heen m toaar June 29, 1995 NL95-0053 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: David Meyers, Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch Division of Freedom of Information and Publication Services Office of Administration, Mail Stop T-6D-59.
Washington, D. C. 20555
Subject:
Review of NRC Inspection Report Content, Format, and Style
Dear Sir:
The Federal Register, Vol. 60, No, 103 (FR 95-13104) dated May 30, 1995, requested comments from the regulated industry concerning NRC inspection report content, format and style. Florida Power Corporation provides the attached as our comments.
Sincerely,
(
K. R. Wilson, Manager Nuclear Licensing KRW/RLM:ff Attachment CRYSTAL RIVER ENERGY COMP &X: 15700 W Power Une St . Crystal River, Florida 344284708 . (904) 7954486 A Fkwida Progress Com[nny 9507110014 950629 PDR G ADOCK 05000302 PDR
l ,
4
'A.' Inspection Report Content ,
4 QUESTION: COMMENT
- 1. Focus on safety: 1.
- a. Are inspection reports a. Inspection reports are frequently not ,
appropriately focused on safety- appropriately focused on safety issues. '
issues? Should report writers be required to articulate the safety ,
significance of each finding? *
- b. Is _ the level of detail for a given issue generally commensurate with the :
significance of that issue?
- c. What threshold of significance c. Existing reports frequently do not use-should be used to determine whether or an appropriate threshold of significance.
not an observation should be documented in the inspection report?
Do existing reports generally use an '
appropriate threshold of significance?
- d. Are reports, as currently written, too negative in their focus? Should d. Reports are currently too negative. :
" equal time" be given to discussions of licensee strengths and successes? " Equal time" should be given to strengths !
If so, what criteria should be used to and weaknesses.
include such findings in inspection reports?
- 2. Supporting Details: 2.
- a. Do inspection reports generally .
contain an appropriate level of detail i to describe technically complex i issues?
- b. What level of detail should be included for describing an event when ;
that event has already been described separately in a licensee event report? -
- c. What level of detail should be used '
to describe inspection activities when little or no findings have resulted from those activities? :
- d. What are the costs and benefits of ;
including, as enclosures to the.
report, all referenced material to d. The inclusion of all referenced i support report findings (e.g., material would not be cost beneficial, t licensee procedures, supporting
- calculations, or independent studies)? i i
i i
i
i QUESTION: COMMENT'
- 3. no comment.
- 3. Enforcement Issues:
a.' What information-should be included in inspection reports to support j
.taking enforcement actions?- l
'b. Are reports generally clear in ;
stating the circumstances of the
~ violation (e.g., what requirement was -
violated, how it was. violated, who
-identified it, etc.)?
- c. Is sufficient detail generally given to substantiate enforcement-related ' conclusions? .
- d. Should all-minor and non-cited violations be documented in inspection i reports? What threshold should be used I to determine the significance of- 'j compliance items that must be ;
documented? :!
4.. Clear
Conclusions:
- 4. no comment.
- a. Are report conclusions generally well-supported by facts?-Is the progression of logic generally clear?
- b. Is a conclusion statement ~.
always necessary for each section of the report (e.g., when limited observations or findings were made in agiven. area)?
/
B. Inspection Report Format QUESTION: COMMENT
- 1. Consistency: 1.
- a. Should inspection report formats be a. Inspection report formats should be consistent from region to region? What consistent from region to region.
benefits or problems would result from adopting a standardized report outline?
- b. What are tile advantages and disadvantages of combined or integrated inspection reports (e.g.,
one report per six weeks, per reactor site, covering all areas)?
- c. When is the use of "boilerplate" appropriate (i.e., standard phrases or sentences used from report to report to describe similar inspection methods, purposes, or conclusions)?
Should more or less boilerplate be used?
- 2. Readability: 2.
- a. What features increase or decrease a ranort's readability or ef. Liveness in communication?
- b. Do you prefer a narrative or a b. A "bulletized" appearance is preferred.
"bulletized" appearance?
- 3. Usefulness: 3. no comment
- a. What features increase or decrease the efficiency of later efforts to retrieve information from a report (e.g., for SALP reviews, regional studies, or external reviews)?
- b. Are there particular parts of the report that could be deleted without decreasing the report quality or ,
detracting from its function?
- 4. The summary should take a balanced ,
- 4. Report Summaries: What information approach with equal time given to ;
should be included in a report strengths and weaknesses, summary? How should it be presented? ,
v:
- 5. Cover Letters: How might cover -
letters be modified to express more clearly the level of concern, or to !
better convey a particular performance message to a licensee?
C. Inspection Report Style QUESTION: COMMENT
- 1. Style variations: In what ways do 1. no comment variations in writing style influence the effectiveness of inspection reports?
- 2. NRC style: Are there particular 2. no comment features of standard NRC style (e.g.,
consistent use of past tense or third-person form) that make inspection reports more readable? Less readable?
- 3. Tone: Are inspection reports 3. Inspection reports are generally not generally written in an appropriate written in an appropriate tone. Too many tone? adjectives and nouns are used in the negative, e.g. " failure to...".
Inspection reports should be written in a t neutral tone.
- 4. Grammatical Construction: Are 4. no comment inspection reports generally acceptable in sentence and paragraph construction? Do they give evidence of careful proofreading?
D. Additional Comments D. The whole emphasis in this survey seems to be how negative information can be In addition to the above specific presented so it can be easily retrieved .
issues, commenters are invited to and communicated. Inspection reports !
provide any other views on NRC should provide a balanced view l inspection reports that could assist particularly since they are reviewed for i the NRC in improving their SALP input. The NRC needs to change the i effectiveness. culture of inspectors. The majority seem '
to believe the more negatively they write their report, the more it looks like they are being a tough regulator.
i 4
-__- _ ____ _ _ _ _