Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Issue date | Title | Topic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ML20204G652 | 18 March 1999 | Comments Re PRM 50-64.Urges Commission to Delete Paragraph Containing Joint & Several Liability Clause as Contained in Final Policy Statement | |
| 3F1298-06, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps.Expresses Concern Re Absence of Definition of risk-significant Configurations & Unacceptable Level for Safety Function Degradation | 9 December 1998 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps.Expresses Concern Re Absence of Definition of risk-significant Configurations & Unacceptable Level for Safety Function Degradation | |
| 3F1098-09, Comment Re Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial Npps.Recommends That Assessment Process Be Reviewed with Consideration of Enforcement Process,Insp Process & Reporting Process | 5 October 1998 | Comment Re Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial Npps.Recommends That Assessment Process Be Reviewed with Consideration of Enforcement Process,Insp Process & Reporting Process | Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
| ML20199E082 | 23 January 1998 | Comment Supporting PRM 50-63A Re Emergency Plan for CR3 to Include Mandatory Stockpiling of Ki for Distribution to General Public in Event of Severe Accident | |
| ML20098B280 | 27 September 1995 | Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-61 Re Proposed App as Improvement Over Existing App R on Basis That It Allows Utilities to Apply Fire Protection Resources in Proportion to Safety Significance of Plant Areas | Safe Shutdown Fire Barrier Exemption Request |
| ML20091S053 | 31 August 1995 | Comment on Review of Revised NRC SALP Program.Use of Numerical Scores Has Proven to Be Punitive from Economic Perspective | Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance |
| NL-95-0061, Comment on Draft GL Re Testing of safety-related Circuits. Util Primary Concern W/Requested Actions of Proposed GL Is Schedule | 18 July 1995 | Comment on Draft GL Re Testing of safety-related Circuits. Util Primary Concern W/Requested Actions of Proposed GL Is Schedule | |
| NL-95-0053, Comment on Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style. Insp Repts Frequently Not Appropriately Focused on Safety Issues | 29 June 1995 | Comment on Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style. Insp Repts Frequently Not Appropriately Focused on Safety Issues | |
| ML20083N461 | 5 May 1995 | Comment Re Proposed GL Concerning Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety Related Power Operated Valves.Tis to Insp Personnel,Surveys or Other Means Could Confirm That SR Power Operated Valves Capable of Performing Safety Function | Power-Operated Valves Power Operated Valves Backfit |
| ML20077M679 | 29 December 1994 | Comments Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operation for Nuclear Power Reactor | Backfit |
| ML20077E823 | 8 December 1994 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule | License Renewal |
| ML20064G149 | 8 March 1994 | Comments on Whistleblower Protection Issue.Lists Violations Identified | |
| ML20067C149 | 15 February 1994 | Comment on Draft NUREG-5884 Re Revised Analyses of Decommissioning for Ref Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station | |
| ML20056G983 | 27 August 1993 | Comment on Whistleblower Protection Issue | |
| 3F0492-15, Comment Concurring W/Comments Offered by NUMARC on Sections 7 & 8 of Draft NUREG-1449, Shutdown & Low-Power Operation at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants in Us. Urges NRC to Consider Comments Carefully | 30 April 1992 | Comment Concurring W/Comments Offered by NUMARC on Sections 7 & 8 of Draft NUREG-1449, Shutdown & Low-Power Operation at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants in Us. Urges NRC to Consider Comments Carefully | |
| ML20094E114 | 19 December 1991 | Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-8005, Assessing External Radiation Dose from Airborne Radioactive Matls. Reg Guide Provides Minimal New Info to Nuclear Industry & Would Probably Be Best Combined W/Some Other Reg Guide | |
| ML20024H428 | 24 May 1991 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. | |
| ML19324B870 | 27 October 1989 | Comments on 54FR40221 Re Licensee Application for Amend to License DPR-72,eliminating Need to Test Diesel Generator in 30-minute Rating.Application Objection Expressed | |
| 3F0289-18, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Industry Actions in Maint Area Effective W/Continuing Improvement Across Industry.Balance of Plant Equipment Inappropriate | 28 February 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Industry Actions in Maint Area Effective W/Continuing Improvement Across Industry.Balance of Plant Equipment Inappropriate | |
| 3F1288-02, Requests That Comment Period Be Extended from 60 Days to 120 Days on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint in Nuclear Power Plants | 2 December 1988 | Requests That Comment Period Be Extended from 60 Days to 120 Days on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint in Nuclear Power Plants | |
| 3F1287-24, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Formal Tech Spec Amends Should Not Be Required to Implement Changes & No 10CFR170 Fees Should Be Incurred | 22 December 1987 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Formal Tech Spec Amends Should Not Be Required to Implement Changes & No 10CFR170 Fees Should Be Incurred | |
| ML20236A044 | 13 October 1987 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Proposed Rule Devoid of Objective Guidance or Criteria for Distinguishing Between Cases Where cost-benefit Analysis Permissible & Where Not |