ML22004A375

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:48, 20 January 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (43) of Mary Able on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2
ML22004A375
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/03/2022
From: Able M
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Office of Administration
References
86FR62220 00043, NRC-2020-0277
Download: ML22004A375 (1)


Text

1/4/22, 4:21 PM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/ba228c12-f89e-4590-b9d3-6643b99bbeed SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 As of: 1/4/22 4:21 PM E-RIDS=ADM-03 Received: January 03, 2022 PUBLIC SUBMISSION ADD: Phyllis Clark, Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. kxz-4ehi-fcyd Stacey Imboden, Mary Neely Comments Due: January 03, 2022 Comment (43)

Publication Date:

Submission Type: Web 11/9/2021 Citation: 86 FR 62220 Docket: NRC-2020-0277 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2020-0277-0194 NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2020-0277-DRAFT-0239 Comment on FR Doc # 2021-24407 Submitter Information Name: Mary Able Address:

McArthur, CA, 96056 Email: zzdogbob@gmail.com General Comment How many disasters at nuclear power plants must there be before building and/or restoration of old plants will stop? Chernobyl, Three Mile Island and Fukushima come immediately to mind. The risks of human failure and structural failure are just too great to justify persisting wth nuclear power...it is not the answer to climate change.

blob:https://www.fdms.gov/ba228c12-f89e-4590-b9d3-6643b99bbeed 1/1