ML20215C301
| ML20215C301 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 04/03/1986 |
| From: | Weil C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Hind J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215C208 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-86-373, FOIA-86-A-124 NUDOCS 8610100221 | |
| Download: ML20215C301 (10) | |
Text
[ ,** g .g%
g76 ,,,,, ,, ,,
NUCLEAR REGULATERY COMMisslON D QJ E ' i, f
- p
pt f d neaean m j
i
$ j i
/7 ( 7e ostvtLT nono h
~
e, t I / l cLEN VN. 0LLINO 60137 J
...+* YM '
v// g(fo4 y I cb 4,s / ~" -
e.:lpe MEMORANDUM FOR: J. A. Hind, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards FROM: C. H. Well, Investigation and Compliance Specialist
SUBJECT:
ALLEGATIONS RE: RADIATION PROTECTION AT FERMI 1 AND 2 (50-16;50-341)(AMSNO: RIII-86-A-0053)
On March.28, 1986, an anonymous male .telepho.ned Region III and provided the following' information~ concerning radiation protection 'at the Fermi Plant . Units 1 and 2:
Employment Discrimination I:
\ ~j,
. . . . - 7s+ -4g--- .v .;. ~~~~'~. ~.--"-~;- ~~. ~:-~.~: .~t.---~~- =:r=r ~=-'*""=n C . -- l-r i d i -
8610100221 860929
, Fermi 1 Issues ) fW 'D # /
Sodium druming was done without regard "or radiation protection. The ..
.T operations people wanted the druming completed as soo . as possible and the druming operation "did not conform to good health physics principals."
- a. The caller stated that too many sodium filled drums were stacked..in O
pg the area and that respiratory protection was not provided. -
- gdlA b. According to the caller, the only personal protection equipment furnished were gloves and welders' eye shields. No respirators were _
f .lS lark M1 L htQg 5 '
s.V e
- hp V slo -w ii e Q3
Q ue f..~ r ' m []f ~. L*' ~ ~ ,_' N Q * *]} l lp ic o m y y ~ r d ~ "]'jr & - [~. '_, .'. L ' f gi.
DL_
g -
- c. . u- ., .
. r- #
J. A. Hind 2 / April 3, 1986 2.
The Fermi 1 facility was improperly posted. According to the caller, a and not know that he had entered a radiation area because th not posted at that hallway. /d,_. .. ... J' !
- 3. '
The caredcaller aboutcontended cleanliness.that the Fermi 1 facility was "a mess" and no one -
-M_ ,
' Ci ,, ,/ . ,
Fermi 2 1ssues
^
p 1.
w, f .f The caller's primary concern was with the breathing air system.
a.
The caller stated that the breathing air system shares much of the ' ~
. . f9q,8 ,%
- same piping with the system used to "backflush spent resins" and no
.j i q check valves were installed to. prevent contamination of the breathing air. 3 pd';
I <
b.
) The breathing air system did not haye any inline radiation monitors insta11ed. Art y- , m '
c . s' The breathing air system was almost non-existent in many places and f contained only a minimal amount of piping and "a few CARD 0X bottles." ',
The, caller contended that the breathing air system was inadequate.
2
/.
2 The caller state over the years. that 500 radiation sources had been received at Fermi a were missing. land"many" o e could not specify how many sources were actually missing. (The caller was asked if the sources were specifically licensed or generally licensed by the NRC. His answer was that some were
" controlled by 10 CFR Part 19 and Part 20."
the missing sources were from "SPINGS and PINGS."He indicated that many /
,. ,, /
3.
The caller had several concerns with SPINGS/ PINGS.
a.
, M
, The caller contended that the Fermi 2 SPINGS and PINGS were improperly piped (e.g., pipe runs too long, pipe too narrow) to be vd i able to obtain "a true reading." He stated that 3/4" diameter pipe K. was used in 300' to 400' runs between the SPING/ PING r.nd the collection point and that was too long to obtain accurate readings.
,f b.
Some of the calibration technicians (not named) were unqualified4
}' g e c.
a 4
4 }; Many of the devices were not properly calibrated because the calibration devices were not calibrated.
, i[ d.
The SPING/ PING calibration procedures did not adequately incorporate NUREG guidance.
t py y bg M.A
f ._. j _ fw l h u j '? .c ~ ~ ' -h
. .. ..c .. .
./ ,' J. A. Hind' p* 3 April 3, 1986
- r" .
He stated he had identified the above concerns (numbers 1, 2 and 3) to his supervisor,, and nothing had been done to correct his concerns.
4
'0 4. According to the caller, the calibration devices had never been calibrated to a National Bureau of Standards standard; therefore, none of the plant's f i: , s radiation protection instrumentation was properly calibrated.
- o N . c4 U . -) .(
~
The air condition system for the " Reactor Fuel Floor, the fifth ficor" has
" never worked properly, and 48" diameter " portable" fans were installed to Y
circulate the air on a permanent basis. ,_
ow m -
M t ._9 Harold Higgins, the Radiation Protection Superintendent for Operations,'/g. u i
/j was not qualified for his position. According to the caller, Higgins has six years of experience in the U.S. Navy and did not have any experience at a comercial power plant. The caller stated that-Higgins was required
..,.e... -~.
+o have_,twn_y. ears of commerciaLpower plant. experience to hold his.. posit. ion.J-.-
r< .ut-.4 ..y.
- 7. "Nothing has ever been done to fix a leak in the drywell area." According to the caller, the " circulating" water pumps leak and have never been repaired. The only thing that has beeri done is to rope off the area and
.-. post. it as a radiation area.
, .- - - e- -
. l ', 8.
Radiation protection per,sonn<el do not routinely monitor the dressing area..
- 1, Therefore, many employees ignore requirements to " double bootee" or " double glo've." "A bad attitude" exists on the part of the employees'when dressing. ~
9.
-~ .
Fermi 2 does not have procedures or has inadequate procedures in the following areas:
- a. No procedure to compare air monitoring results to MPC hours / minutes,
- b. No procedure to specify when nasal smears are to be taken.
- c. Inadequate procedure to specify when whole body counting should'be done.
,.. c..~. ,
w r. . #~- ! ~ -
j.{l'(',,,--d;, No trend analysis program for air sampling.
- ' I ' ~
l-
.{'g[ under the Al. ARA Program.No ' c' procedure to specify when to u,se pr h
7,' s .'
- 0. Operations personnel expect the radiation protection personnel to enter the Condenser Well to take radiation readings. The caller noted that s- ' based on his experience at other nuclear power plants, the Condenser Well will be an extremely high radiation area during operations and should not be entered.
- 11. Many heal *.h physics technicians were hired without any prior experience.
Their inexperience was demonstrated in the low scores they achieved in their qualification examinations. Also, Hydro Nuclear identified this problem during an audit and Detroit Edison did not take any corrective -
action. . s - '
- a. m
'/,
.,.7
,. ,. ,f ,. f . . . s _ o
. . ,4 J. A. Hind 4 April 3, 1986 12.
"The only real training at Fermi is in reactor operations. All other training is done by computer."
, a.
/ The computer method has built in problems, including the " wrong answers in the programs for breathing air and.MPC hours."
b.
g The computer programs do not use the latest reference materials, including " Reg Guides and 10 CFR 20."
self teaching and it's not effective." "The whole emphasis is on 13.
e "Femi does not comply with the FSAR in HP and operations." The caller I could not give specific examples, but agreed to call back with the infomation.
On April 1,1986, the matter was discussed with Eu Office of-Investiga.tions Region'III Field Office. gene .T.. Pawlik, Director, It was concluded that an inve'stigation into the alleged employm'ent discrimination could not be initiated without the alleger's identity. Further, the remaining issues did not suggest wrongdoing. Accordingly, this matter was assigned within~the Allegation Safeguards Management for resolution. System to the Division ~of Radiation Safety and
- c. .--,, m n.:
,,(
- y n p
- e:.-G -
.. i
; ' .'jj'i,j,l- "
~'
- ' ~ /jg7j -
y Charles H. Weil .-
Investigatiori and Compliance Specialist
Enclosure:
AMS Form >.u 1 y p.. - .
w-- f' '
i cc w/ enclosure:
RIII:RA0
.'..r,- ' ' ~
i r,.. c'. -
RIII:DRP ', (' c - "-
01:RIII c,j _ .,..., ,. b..< - .-
,Is E. G. Greenman . /-
/ ~ ' '"'"
W. D. Shafer L. R. Greger
- d'$'"' D' '
- G. C. Wright '
l ..
,t .'f, f y t..
. - + , 3.,,
.,. , .4 !* .-
.. 7;,
, ,w s . ., -
. ,s e- . #
/.
. ,, . . . . . . - n ; ,
_7_
,,.t I<. '
,ji ,. .t.
1
.- -- . _ - . , _ . - - - . . . - . - - _-.--.,m- - . _ - . - ..
.t.Cecg , , ,
~
,t UNITED Sir.f E s wf' f$(
k .
NUCLE AR REGULATORY Commission ie( ';k ,-'
[' C.EG80N all n, mooseveu aoao l
c+ a ..
cu ~ c a.v ~. u.~o., .. n -
{ , .1 - ..~
w .... .. . f ys._..ggj~3,1986 9,2 53 g'. g. -
g . 3
,' p.' U 52
- YA
\u N kg '
MEMORANDUM FOR: J. A. Hind, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards FROM: C. H. Weil, Investigation and Compliance Specialist
SUBJECT:
ALLEGATIONS RE: RADIATION PROTECTION AT FERMI 1 AND 2 (50-16; 50-341) (AMS N0: RIII-86-A-0053) :
i On March 28, 1986, an anonymous male telephoned Region III and provided the following information concerning radiation protection at the Fermi Plant Units 1 and 2:
Employment Discrimination c,
l \ -::.
I \i l
i
~
- ~ --:- t=. ~ ~ ~-~ &-- --~.2T~%=-~~ ' "~~ T=' ~==~=""~~="= =="==*~~' *? ~~T I i t
i
- l i
, o l
l .
Fermi 1 Issues 1
- 1. Sodium drumming was done without regard for radiation protection. The operations people wanted the drunining completed as soon as possible and
,, the druming operation "did not confonn to good health physics principals."
~> a.
X, :,' The caller stated that too many sodium filled drums were stacked in the area and that respiratory protection was not provided.
i' .'Ib. -
According to the caller, the only persor.al protection equipment yr ' furnished were gloves and welders' eye shields. No respirators were
,.-- , provided.
l ~
p ,-
m
./ . . . . It - . . ' ,- g
.y yv - " '
~
fl Y s J. A. Hind 'l [ 2 April 3, 1986
- 2. The Fermi 1 facility was improperly posted. According to the caller, a person can enter the contaminated druming area from the turbine hallway and not know that he had entered a radiation area because the area was ,
not posted at that hallway.
- 3. The caller contended that the Fermi 1 fcility a was."a mess" and no one cared about cleanliness. -
. .. , . . : , _ y.ra>% ~~~ t b^*3**
Fermi 2 Issues , fi, ,
- 1. The caller's primary concern was with the breathing air system.
.g a ., The caller stated that the breathing air system shares much of the y same. piping with the system used to "backflush spent resins" and no
[ y
.Q check valves were installed to prevent contamination of the breathing i f, @c. ,p air.
(. b. The breathirig air system did not have any inline radiation monitors ,
installed. % . . ,. c > . , . -
['\
.O[g 7 -- a-
~ . . , . . .
, ,,, .,.,,i. ,
'y ; - c. The breathing air system was alhost non-existent in many places and j f contained only a minimal amount of piping and "a few CARD 0X bottles."
U ,/3 -
- a. ..=.-m >
3,, - < '
.r! The caller contended that the breathing air system was inadequate.J#4 vA vf'Mp-cr ms. v: ,
i' i
/. 2.
r' ,overhe caller stated that the yeafs.TRe was500 radiation assigned to inventorysourcesthose had been received sourceQnd -at Fermi "many" (- , k.q('.,j/.
/ H Fcould not specify how many sources were actually
. missing. (The caller was asked if the sources were specifically licensed i
f'-(,,i',.weremissing.
,'or generally licensed by the NRC. His answer was that some were SI d - " controlled by 10 CFR Part 19 and Part 20." He indicated that many of /. - '
.e,.
f the missing sources were from "SPINGS and PINGS." ,
).
- 3. The call.er had several concerns with SPINGS/ PINGS. ;
/ .
- a. /The caller contended that the Fermi 2 SPINGS and PINGS were improperly piped (e.g., pipe runs too long, pipe too narrow) to be
/ able to obtain "a true reading." He stated that 3/4" diameter pipe .
/ was used in 300' to 400' runs between the SPING/ PING and the
- collection point and that was too long to obtain accurate readings. ,
- b. Some of the calibration technicians (not named) were unqualified.
- c. Many of the devices were not properly calibrated because the calibration devices were not calibrated.
- d. The SPING/ PING calibration procedures did not adequately incorporate NUREG guidance.
l l
l l~
I
P t
J. A. Hind 3 April 3, 1986 He stated hp..had identified the above concerns (numbers 1, 2 and 3) to his ;
supervisor, _
]andnothinghadbeendonetocorrecthisconcerns. X,
- 4. According to the caller, the calibration devices had never been calibrated t i to a National Bureau of Standards standard; therefore, none of the plant's 5' radiation protection instrumentation was properly, calibrated.
- 5. The air condition system for the " Reactor Fuel Floor, the fifth floor" has ,
never worked properly, and 48" diameter " portable" fans were installed to 1 circulate..the. air,on a permanent basis. _ _
w
- 6. Harold Higgins, the Radiation Protection Superintendent for Operations, -
'.. was not qualified for his position. According to the caller, Higgins has .8; six years of experience in the U.S. Navy and did not have any experience at a commercial power plant. The caller stated that Higgins was required
'?
.g to have two years of commercial power plant experience to hold his position. -y
- 7. "Nothing has ever been 'done to fix a leak in the drywel.1 area." According to the caller, the " circulating" water pumps leak and have never been '
repaired. The only thing that has been done is to,' rop.e_.nf_f._the.. area.and ' '
post it as a radiation area. _'
// N ~
Radiation protection personnel do not routinely monitor the dressing area."N ',-~ ~ . '
- 8. !
Therefore, many employees ignore requirements to " double bootee" or " double 5
glove."
"A bad attitude" exists on the part of the employees when dressing./,p.
y
'y
- 9. Fermi 2 does not have procedures or has inadequate procedures in the _ h following areas: -
- j ,j . . & . t .
jy a. No procedure to compare air monitoring results to MPC hours / minute's. ' '
i
. ., I
,- b. t j.O No procedure to gp.ect.fy wheg,na, sal smear,s, are to be taken. .y .-
'g c.
f.j Inadequate procedure to specify when whole body counting should be done. .
. . :. . . y .
- d. No trend analysis program for air sampling.
e.
No procedure to specify when to use protective clothing and equipment, under the ALARA Program. '
../. ,. % . ~'
l'i 6s..n r. : :.
- 10. Operations persor.nel expect the radiation protection personnel to enter the Condenser Well to take radiation readings. The caller noted that
' based on his experience at other nuclear power plants, the Condenser Well will be an extremely high radiation area during operations and should not be entered.
- 11. Many health physics technicians were hired without any prior experience.
Their inexperience was demonstrated in the low scores they achieved in i
their qualification examinations. Also, Hydro Nuclear identified this problem during an audit and Detroit Edison did not take any corrective action.
r x' a t.* '. ' i C
3 J. A. Hind ,/[4 \
April 3, 1986
- 12. "The only real training at Fermi is in reactor operations. All other training is done by computer."
- a. The computer method has built in problems, including the " wrong answers in the programs for breathing air and MPC hours."
- b. The computer programs do not use the latest reference materials, including " Reg Guides and 10 CFR 20." "The whole emphasis is on self teaching and it's not effective." .ts . v..
r' could not give specific examples, but agreed to call back with the ~
7'- informa tion. :- ,.
.~
On April 1,1986, the matter was discussed with Eugene T. Pawlik, Director, '^ -
Office of Investigations Region III Field Office. It was concluded that an -
investigation into the alleged employment discrimi_ nation could not be
-' 4:
' initiated without'the alleger's identity- Further, the remaining issues did not suggest wrongdoing. Accordingly, this matter was assigned within the * '
Allegation Management System to the Division of Radiation Safety and cri Safeguards for resolution.
s Charles H. Weil Investigation and Compliance Specialist
Enclosure:
AMS Form -
, , ;,3, g . .. . .. ,
t cc w/ enclosure: f f RIII:RA0 RIII:DRP OI:RIII E. G. Greenman ~
W. D. Shafer L. R. Greger G. C. Wright F
J
, i I _
w=
o .
s g :~ , I y fL '
w G_
fo "t A s
er g # N I g g- O D P]
e I ;
f, " O O m
a }. ;r T I
N E
" e, c,
i 1 -
W AO I
n ra r re 7 mBSM I g I -
.,' b FI
- a c,
i 1 h P, n C E T
m i 1 I g 1 j , I o n
J N*
ID FN k OM l r h u / )F N
o i 1 p/ N s it t
fE OM h nW y f"
t I g l i 1 I
lL v =o w A "
t u
i 1 l
gI"' l p1 2 i
r
= NM OO E
GE Q *d h'
I 9 g_ s . = e C A L
e i
i 1
g' I l gi [w. f.
F*
R E A R S
E L
E@
L S
E & e y 3 gb
, I E I Y
P d 2 0 A V a i !
- A , 8 a r l
e a i 1 I g l y_ J s, / .,
8 a s
- f. ff w,.
5 l
- l l
o) uM 7n t i 1 es g I , I s
I l g 91 i 1 n
e a
i i
1 1
I 9 I l
l .
s df , I
=
Z lb p 7 e.
u A~ /
t I , I t X eh1 1
i l I g l rz l
w o D w e
- s. ,e , =
as l '1 I 9 l
l lp pA s I
=
=
E T
Mf/ r r
e i 1 l u
) n f T. , I v IA t
g r fr r
o 1 I 9 l
T a
- ns t E
[ g r l] C e N g s
f e fsy I I I od i 1 I ,
A n t
i w
t i
1 1 1 ,
I lgEbm l
s a
,, I .
N A
C f
I T
S n
u p
a s M, a p l
a l 1 I t A A2p smt I i _
, l 5
= i 1 1
N _
5 l
zt G A f ,
atnf 1 , -
i l I e R
i i I 7
l r 2 S W i I I 1
f l ;
2f
, I Y T
a s
osu N
O 9 y ,
fp E 1 -
i I l F A
l w t. 2p , I E
w I f
p f l F T d, f i I
s___ O A A i l t
l s e * . -
o 5 G
< n-T l' , l o 9[
i l l
I l1 , _
i l I
ss a l
,, 1 , I .v
- 4 E L
2 t
i 1 n e'l L 4
I t
i l c A f , _
a dN.
i 1 t 1
I o
a e a l , I n a '^ t 7 f. e.
a n f
i 1
/ s 1 te 2 Ar t l a g n I a M , I g o e" I R i 1 a l u l e c.
s a l 1 G
E r- a ,
i r T l mf_Am D c oh I , I E n g
p p2 %, A r.p I
b i
i 1
1 le b
1 I
p s,
a.
8 a =
l o 5 l l
yf r
I E
O N
Qiilfl,,~ l
= o.
s c ,
t 1 a c
I c
- s. e e l
py_t.hc o t , lR H
&[**
f ,
T 1
I P
t.>g o l E h aP
' c '
U n g 1 r e l
. J L t v/
I I E re s ,a l
E v ,
P e i 1 st a I K
l n.r7M e ra T s N w l 1 e
a I a l o D_ j- I 5 s o u u o.
I E = i 1 r e
e n
v n w l a n
", E T
C u7
= M f r.1 f
C h l z r. r_ f ffC I I A T o l oo v/d 'g t
E t 1 C e c A C A ] T ,
o=I L.
( t u
T A
F f
O Y
T E
C O
i l 1 1
Y TI
. I s
i l
e 2s f, E C
t I
FI F
T N
O ur r-l c u f f '
o nf Al s. O G
P IL i 1 I a i C
y lyff ..R.
V D N m 4 E a_ u **; s al am I
I C a TI R l o,.
O N 3 a 1 n A'D V A . . a O
l C
N '
I A j s 8 m 1 E
M ""~ 7 A e
A WJ /
I F t L _ Y. 5 s I v ' s O E C D I A l
i ', I a T u
_ I e
N l , t. C l
.P u wfc f
- g E s T R T s O l o, ,, A o N A A l I A
L o
n i
T I
l t fb s*u w
- 8. A. Ar
!. l T C n G
E i l U G
a u
t N 5 5
}
- A [( ou ' , s. a, l
e P 7 fA AL o
. r t
G U l a
l i E I E
/> v
= a L rs e MV e F = r t R l s
M a n o
W i l f L / o' -
_ A f
l l
l F
O E
a s
a f
4 t a
a l
l m7R f Hf =
a"3 o v i
(
N en r s
a t.
E w JA O i
i P s
$' T A '5 r n
$ t.1 fd-l l P .' .
O i l v i i o's i ry a
gf7w v1 t F K _,
i T
ie.
r e
a [ O' SC f l 4 2C l
A i l 7
(
?
C C u=
T G .e d* 9 -_ N .
s g
n e E o
[ 2 _
rpfZ l
a s
E r y G a /_ A o
v L 7
d 1%
f t L ts
_ l l
s a [*
w f ",
o t A r
- r. [ D E
A t o I
o u e G t S f
r l
l s
t I C e t e
'f, a grfD aM w
a a
Ni v
T C
A G S u
O C
L u n, e f a
C u,f f
J I l o ib A n zf* [#
T E
mi e I t C f, N R* i~ R 8 l l t
n rs e c a = E O T
S L 0
~ a l l u I n e n8 C 2 e p'
l l
l l e I mo r t
M2 4 im u A.
si vi E
- 2 L' *8 i7 C :.
f f
y Be uf c o c
, - v v 1
,G) ire
, I l O a i
~n&
a e i t I w v h Dl i l L .
u g e. s a w v ek o N_ f a
n i
l l l
I sir A t a o e
. =
E
.ai o u
. Q fMd se 1 or 4 A
, [_ 0 8
- d l
l I 2
i l d}A 1 . a t
ol o6! . M -
T
=
o aII I l w
f l r
2 la f l a
_ a . a o n%
a n
I v t I A ~ r
- aM "r
i l o s l
l l
l o
m e
- I N M)e o
l w
u I
- vld .. .
. 1 Mr tl tl rl l
l l i v e
I E
I f
e 8
A S
o v fTh_
fAC r
o RA
,- v B.T h Z t s
e v
ot s e
i o
r t
nw a a
'3I
=
oO
=
l 0
T N
N 6
A G a a
A i
E'E "O
w2 tbA 0
f c
R
'm* fl($ iA
]
u.s e
v s}. CS O
S O
L lh r S E t . ,
tl ss e v ee *A l
TO I saP e N a L s s
dl E se M .i t. L wo s -
L A
v A r
- >,l su
'y I C' Is o. f a.
n CM a a t l I 2f e f
- r2 r rti /QA*<
Li L
n t
S
=
?
t a ae t
~. t o r
a w e=
e c.
- e
- DE #s ro x i A n1 i5 a Ae a Yv I
e t o o a h9' c e =t l
s s w f o a i
Aw s e o a e n , . ia P
a s e I f
.S TAnCA n o a t E .
e E u t
= v t s O. nO 1
e t s t e u t c TN a e S
= e a r 8e i st a .
W i
e
- c. o A o n C f l n a g a A iW r a aMs
- s. "a f r t M o f
o c c L e O P
o .A Y- Y uu AN f
E a A.
r A s C u
a 3
e e e o wWW
. . , e
.J E
y h O .o tO camUS" o o
iN
- f -.A /N r
e
- h e f
_ o i
aM
- e
l t
u.
~
- . . .;Q' a
May 2, 1986 Dett01t Eiis.in C, pany 6600 P.te.ic " y. .
. w.
Ferini II - 10S OSB +.
Nev, rt i MI 'E156 Attbetion Jim S '_'.a
Dear Jim:
I am writing regierding ,.r-.vicus con.a t s with you and guestions that I have c: icerning,:;yjbe'.e'..!ycount[ ,
.]_ ,,
I have i.at to r?:ed/a 3 ' py. of ny ',: hela ' .3y countk T'
. 2 efter leaving ?..rmi II i received-a ecpy or ' .y ]. r '
-1 *2 I ha>e yet to receive a copy thd would li'.a me.
Also, if y u enald, I --d the answer to the following questi .s: .
- 1. T.e stc .gth of the Colbolt-60 test source that was in the c.; chine at'the time.of my whole body cc.unt?'
- 2. The distaace bet ?oe the test sc.orce and -
cry back? -
- 3. 'rhw long the T.cichine was on before the ein cas on the nchine were activated?
These questior.s concern ne and I would appreciate an l
1 susver within the next two weeks.
Thank you very nuch.
t Very truly years, s
cc Ron Pau V I Paul Rosen -
Stanley Krawetz -
MAY 5 gggg Y,
s .