Similar Documents from NRC |
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24213A3222024-07-30030 July 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Fermi 2 Audit Questions from the Audit Team Supporting Review of the LAR to Adopt TSTF-505 ML24166A2222024-06-14014 June 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - FW FW (External) Re Fw Kairos Power Test Reactor NRC ML24138A1562024-05-17017 May 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - Preliminary Chapter 5 of Hermes 2 SE to ACRS ML24138A2072024-05-17017 May 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - Preliminary Chapter 13 of Hermes 2 SE to ACRS ML24137A2662024-05-15015 May 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - Preliminary Chapter 9 of Hermes 2 SE to ACRS ML24120A0262024-04-29029 April 2024 COL Docs - FW Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Unit 4 - Project Manager Reassignment ML24120A0462024-04-29029 April 2024 COL Docs - Re Fyi - SNC Notification Received of Vogtle Unit 4 - Completion of Power Ascension Tests ML24119A0012024-04-28028 April 2024 COL Docs - Fyi - SNC Notification Received of Vogtle Unit 4 - Completion of Power Ascension Tests ML24116A1622024-04-25025 April 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for Kairos Hermes 2 Test Reactors in Oak Ridge, Tennessee ML24114A2802024-04-23023 April 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - Preliminary Chapter of Hermes 2 SE to ACRS ML24114A2822024-04-23023 April 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - Preliminary Chapter of Hermes 2 SE ML24113A2722024-04-22022 April 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - Preliminary Chapter of Hermes 2 SE ML24105A0002024-04-14014 April 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - Environmental Audit Summary Report for Hermes 2 ML24095A2922024-04-0404 April 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - Preliminary Chapter of Hermes 2 SE ML24080A4502024-03-20020 March 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - FW Kairos Power Test Reactor NRC ML24074A3712024-03-14014 March 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - Preliminary Chapters of Hermes 2 SE ML24072A3162024-03-12012 March 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - FW Transmittal of Responses to NRC Requests for Confirmatory Information for the Review of the Hermes 2 Environmental Report (Courtesy Copy) ML24059A3892024-02-28028 February 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - Feb 28 2024 Ipac Updated Species List_ Tennessee Ecological Services Field Office (1).pdf ML24057A4222024-02-26026 February 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - RCI Confirmation Message ML24051A2352024-02-20020 February 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - FW HC-1 Status ML24051A2412024-02-20020 February 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - Quick Question ML24046A1352024-02-15015 February 2024 COL Docs - Fyi - SNC Notification Received of Vogtle Unit 4 - Completion of Initial Criticality and Low-Power Testing ML24039A1922024-02-0808 February 2024 COL Docs - Correction - Re Fyi - SNC Notification Received of Vogtle Unit 4 Completion of Pre-Critical Tests ML24039A1122024-02-0808 February 2024 COL Docs - Re Fyi - SNC Notification Received of Vogtle Unit 4 Completion of Pre-Critical Tests ML24039A0882024-02-0808 February 2024 COL Docs - Fyi - SNC Notification Received of Vogtle Unit 4 Completion of Pre-Critical Tests ML24031A0502024-01-31031 January 2024 COL Docs - FW Erroneous Description of Tier 2 Change Process in Construction Lessons-Learned Report ML24030A9732024-01-30030 January 2024 Kairos - Hermes 2 Docs - RCI Preview for Hermes 2 Environmental Audit ML23331A9992023-11-27027 November 2023 COL Docs - Re Re Re ML23079A125 - Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Unit 3, NRC Response Letter to P. Durand, Regarding Comment on Federal Register Notice License Amendment No. 189 ML23326A2802023-11-22022 November 2023 COL Docs - Re Re ML23079A125 - Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Unit 3, NRC Response Letter to P. Durand, Regarding Comment on Federal Register Notice License Amendment No. 189 ML23320A0342023-11-16016 November 2023 COL Docs - Re Acceptance Review of Southern Nuclear Operating Companys License Amendment Request to Remove Combined License Appendix C (EPID No. 2023-LLA-0123) ML23312A2632023-11-0808 November 2023 COL Docs - Action Request for State of Georgia Comment by 5pm Monday, November 13, 2023 - Vogtle Units 3&4, LAR-22-002, TS 3.8.3, Inverters - Operating Completion Time Extension ML23311A1512023-11-0707 November 2023 COL Docs - Re Acceptance Review of Southern Nuclear Operating Companys License Amendment Request to Remove Combined License Appendix C (EPID No. 2023-LLA-0123) ML23289A1362023-10-16016 October 2023 COL Docs - Action Request for State of Georgia Comment by 5pm Friday, October 20, 2023 - Vogtle Units 3&4, LAR-23-006, Rev.1, More Restrictive Action for Tech. Spec. 3.1.9 ML23283A0332023-10-10010 October 2023 COL Docs - FW Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (LAR 23-009) ML23275A1002023-10-0202 October 2023 COL Docs - Re Action Summary of 9.27.23 Clarification Call with Southern Nuclear Company on LAR-22-0002, TS 3.8.3 Inverters - Operating Completion Time ML23274A0062023-10-0101 October 2023 Hermes CP Doc - Public Summary of Sep 14 Meeting with Consulting Tribe ML23270B1912023-09-27027 September 2023 COL Docs - Update Vogtle Units 3&4 Acceptance Letter for LAR-22-002 Technical Specification 3.8.3, Inverters Operating ML23263A1042023-09-20020 September 2023 COL Docs - FW Fyi for Tomorrow'S Psm Meeting ML23256A2682023-09-13013 September 2023 COL Docs - Acceptance Review of Southern Nuclear Operating Companys License Amendment Request to Remove Combined License Appendix C (EPID No. 2023-LLA-0123) ML23241A0452023-08-29029 August 2023 COL Docs - FW Draft LAR and Exemption Request Regarding Tier 1 and Tier 2 Requirements ML23229A2322023-08-17017 August 2023 COL Docs - FW Re LAR 22-002 Second Round RAI Approved ML23188A151 for Vogtle Units 3 & 4 ML23221A3982023-08-0909 August 2023 COL Docs - LAR 22-002 Second Round RAI Approved ML23188A151 ML23216A1592023-08-0404 August 2023 COL Docs - FW Acceptance Review - Requested Licensing Action Regarding TS Revision to Adopt WCAP-17661-P-A, Improved Relaxed Axial Offset Control and Constant Axial Offset Control Fq Surveillance TS (L-2022-LLA-0148 and L-2022-LLA-0149) ML23212A9642023-07-31031 July 2023 COL Docs - Action - Start of Annual Fees - Vogtle Unit 3 Completion of Power Ascension Testing and Declaration of Commercial Operations ML23186A1652023-07-0505 July 2023 COL Docs - FW Vogtle, Units 3 & 4 - Acceptance of LAR 23-003, Relocation of TS 3.7.9 Spent Fuel Pool Makeup Water Sources ML23186A1662023-07-0505 July 2023 COL Docs - Revised Vogtle Units 3&4 Acceptance Letter for LAR-22-002 Technical Specification 3.8.3, Inverters Operating ML23185A0042023-07-0404 July 2023 Hermes CP Doc - Submittal of Supplemental Information from Kairos Power_Redacted (8).pdf ML23181A1912023-06-30030 June 2023 COL Docs - Action Request for State of Georgia Comment by 5pm Monday, July 3, 2023 - Vogtle Unit 4, LAR-23-005 - Timing of Tech Spec Effectiveness Prior to Initial Criticality ML23180A2452023-06-29029 June 2023 COL Docs - FW Acceptance Review of Southern Nuclear Operating Companys License Amendment Request to Remove Combined License Appendix C (LAR-23-001) ML23180A2442023-06-29029 June 2023 COL Docs - Update Vogtle, Units 3 & 4 - Acceptance of LAR 23-006, Rev. 1, More Restrictive Action for Technical Specification 3.1.9 2024-07-30
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". |
Text
From: Giacinto, Joseph Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 2:07 PM To: AdvancedReactors-GEISDocsPEm Resource
Subject:
NRC - Cooling Tower Air Quality Impacts in New Reactor EISs Attachments: NRC 2021 Cooling Tower.pdf
Cooling Tower Air Quality Impacts in New Reactor EISs North Anna ESP Fogging and most salt deposition would occur within 300 m of the tower. Salt deposition would extend out about a mile. Visible plume could be out to about 3 miles. Impacts are SMALL.
Clinton ESP No specific numbers given, although it references the LR GEIS and indicates that salt deposition impacts would extend out about 1500 m (1 mile) from the tower. Impacts are SMALL.
Grand Gulf ESP No specific numbers given, although it references the LR GEIS and indicates that salt deposition impacts would extend out about 1500 m (1 mile) from the tower. Impacts are SMALL.
Vogtle ESP Longest plume would be 9.7 km (6.0 mi). Fogging and icing would be infrequent. Maximum salt deposition would be at about 490 m (1600 ft) from the NDCT towers. Impacts are SMALL.
North Anna COL (NUREG-1917)
No significant change from ESP Calvert Cliffs COL No numbers or specific analysis are provided for fogging, icing and plume. These were apparently addressed in detail in a State review, which is referenced in our EIS. Impacts are SMALL.
STP COL (NUREG-1937)
(5.7.2, pg 5-70) On the basis of the analysis presented by STPNOC in the ER and the review teams independent evaluation of that analysis, the review team concludes that atmospheric impacts of UHS cooling tower operation would be minimal. Plant would rely mostly on a cooling reservoir, with a smaller helper tower. Fogging wouldnt be an issue and icing is not discussed. Plume average length in winter is 0.4 mi; less in summer. Salt deposition rates are less than 10 lb/ac/mo at 0.3 mi, and around 1 lb/ac/mo at 0.8 mi. Impacts are SMALL.
Summer COL Plume average length in winter is 0.74 mi; less in summer. No cases of fogging or icing were identified in the analysis. Maximum salt deposition was 0.28 lb/ac/mo at 3280 ft from the tower. Impacts are SMALL.
Vogtle COL No significant change from ESP
Comanche Peak COL The longest plume would be 3.86 mi. Fogging and icing could occur within 1.5 mi of the towers.
Maximum salt deposition would be 137.3 kg/km2/mo at 100 m from the towers. Impacts are SMALL.
Levy COL (NUREG-1941)
(5.7.2, pg 5-87) On this basis, the review team concludes that the impacts of operation of LNP Units 1 and 2 on air quality from emissions of criteria pollutants, CO2 emissions, cooling-system emissions, and transmission-line impacts would be SMALL, and no further mitigation would be warranted. Longest plumes would be about 5000 m (about 3 mi). Ground level fogging would be within 1000 m of the towers. Icing isnt mentioned. Maximum on-site salt deposition rate would be 10.75 kg/ha/mo, and maximum offsite would be 6.81 kg/ha/mo. No distances are provided. Impacts are SMALL.
Fermi COL (NUREG-2105)
(5.7.1, pg 5-96) On the basis of the analysis presented by Detroit Edison in the ER and the review teams independent evaluation of that analysis, the review team concludes that atmospheric impacts of cooling tower operation would be minor and that no further mitigation is warranted. Average plume length in winter is 1.5 mi; less in summer. Fogging and icing are not expected to be an issue. Maximum salt deposition would be 0.0002 kg/ha/mo during the winter between 14,436 and 30,840 ft east-northeast of the NDCT. Plume shadowing and other lesser affects are expected to have minimal impacts. Impacts are SMALL.
Lee COL In winter, 20% of plumes are 3.7 mi or longer, with the longest about 6.2 mi; averages are much less in summer. Ground-level fogging is likely to be infrequent and no icing events were predicted. The maximum estimated solids deposition rate for each tower is 0.0103 kg/ha/mo and occurs 200 m north of the towers. Impacts are SMALL.
Turkey Point COL (NUREG-2176)
(5.7.2, pg 5-101) On the basis of the analysis presented in the ER and the review teams independent evaluation of that analysis, the review team concludes that atmospheric impacts of Turkey Point Units 6 and 7 cooling towers would be minimal. Median winter plume would be 250 m, with the longest plumes (infrequent) being over 10,000 m. Fogging is infrequent and icing is not expected. Salt deposition could be as high as 105 kg/ha/mo near the makeup-water reservoir, but less than 10 kg/ha/mo offsite.
Impacts are SMALL.
Bell Bend COL The median plume is 0.64 mi during the winter; less in summer. Ground-level fogging or icing is likely to be infrequent because of the height of the natural draft cooling towers and the resulting plume.
Maximum deposition of salts from cooling-tower drift would be 0.018 lb/ac/mo during the fall season at a downwind distance of 3,937 ft to the east-northeast of the towers. Impacts are SMALL.
PSEG ESP The EIS evaluated both MDCT and NDCT, so theres quite a few numbers. But most plumes would be less that 1 mi in any case. Fogging could extend as far as 3609 ft, although the majority of cases would be less than half that distance. No icing events were predicted. Plume shadowing would mostly occur on site. Beyond 9,843 ft, the average plume shadowing frequency would be less than 145 hours0.00168 days <br />0.0403 hours <br />2.397487e-4 weeks <br />5.51725e-5 months <br /> per year, about 3.3 percent of the 4,380 daylight hours, which would be insignificant in terms of effects on agricultural production. Regarding salt deposition, for MDCT the maximum seasonal impact would occur during the winter, with 1.31 kg/ha/mo at 2,297 ft east of the towers. Impacts from NDCT would be even lower. Impacts are SMALL.
Clinch River ESP (NUREG-2226)
(5.7.2, pg 5-49) On the basis of the analysis presented by the applicant in its ER and the staffs independent evaluation of that analysis, the staff concludes that atmospheric impacts of cooling-tower operation at the CRN Site would not be noticeable and that no further mitigation would be warranted.
Most plumes are under 1000 ft, although plumes as long as 5600 ft are possible in winter. The modeling predicts no fogging or icing hours at any distance from the towers. Impacts of plume shadowing would be minor. The SACTI model predicted maximum deposition rates of 6276 kg/km2/mo annually at 328.1 ft (100 m) west of the towers. At distances of 984.3 ft (300 m) and greater, annual average salt deposition rates are all below 1,000 kg/km2/mo. Finally, at distances of 1,968.5 ft (600 m) and greater, the annual average deposition rate is below 100 kg/km2/mo. Most impacts from salt deposition would be limited to the CRN site.