05000461/FIN-2011005-04
From kanterella
Revision as of 19:43, 20 February 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | Unacceptable Preconditioning of Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System Check Valve Prior to Leak Rate Test Measurement |
| Description | The inspectors identified a finding of very low safety significance with an associated non-cited violation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings. The licensee failed to establish an adequate procedure to perform required leak rate testing for the reactor core isolation cooling turbine exhaust check valve. Specifically, the surveillance test procedure resulted in unacceptable preconditioning of the valve prior to an as-found leak rate test measurement. The licensee entered this issue into its corrective action program for evaluation and initiated a corrective action to revise the test procedure. The finding was of more than minor significance since it was associated with the Procedure Quality attribute for the containment and adversely affected the Barrier Integrity Cornerstone objective to provide reasonable assurance that physical design barriers protect the public from radionuclide releases caused by accidents or events. Because the preconditioning altered the as-found condition of the check valve, the data collected through the performance of the surveillance test was not fully indicative of the true valve performance trend. Therefore, this performance deficiency had a direct effect on the licensees ability to fully assess the past operability, as well as the ability to trend as-found data for the purpose of assessing the reliability of the check valve. The finding was a licensee performance deficiency of very low safety significance because it did not involve an actual open pathway in the physical integrity of the reactor containment. The inspectors concluded that this finding affected the cross-cutting area of problem identification and resolution. Specifically, the licensee did not implement operating experience into station processes, procedures, and training in that the licensee did not update/revise the surveillance test procedure consistent with NRC guidance and the licensees corporate technical position to prevent unacceptable preconditioning of the check valve. |
| Site: | Clinton  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000461/2011005 Section 1R22 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2011 (2011Q4) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Barrier Integrity |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.22 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | B Kemker D Lords J Cassidy J Draper J Mcghee M Bielby M Ring R Jickling S Mischke T Bilikb Kemkerc Brown D Lords D Szwarc J Bozga J Cassidy M Ring R Orlikowski S Bell S Mischke |
| CCA | P.5, Operating Experience |
| INPO aspect | CL.1 |
| ' | |
Finding - Clinton - IR 05000461/2011005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Clinton) @ 2011Q4
Self-Identified List (Clinton)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||