ML20213D547

Forwards Request for Addl Info for Review of Radiation Protection Program

ML20213D547
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway, 05000000
Issue date:	02/02/1981
From:	Kreger W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Tedesco R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20213D283	List: ML20213D281 ML20213D547 ML20215H890 ML20215H903 ML20215H922 ML20215H933 ML20215H937 ML20215H969 ML20215H984 ML20215H991 ML20215H997
References
FOIA-84-21 NUDOCS 8103040765
Download: ML20213D547 (2)

Text

__ . _____ __________________

. h .., ,

,e .

.$.9!*",*.4,** UNillD sl AT Es

~~ h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 8 .' i wasniucion. o. c. mss

• 4 a .!a .

• • '* . . FEB ' ' 1981 DOCKET NOS: 50-483 7

.and e

50-486 +.

4 s

~

HEMORANDUM FOR: Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director

• for Licensing, DL FROM:

William E. Kreger, Assistant Director for Radiation Protection, OSI SUSJECT: - CALLAWAY - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ,

Plant Name: Callaway 1 and 2 .

Licensing Stage: OL Docket Number: 50-483/486 Responsible Branch: LBil; R. Sta'rk, LPM Description of Response: Request for additional information based on FSAR review Review Status: Continuing The Radiological Assessment Branch has reviewed the Snupps - Callaway i-adiation protection pro' gram as described in their FSAR with respec ~

criteria for utility management and technical competence of their staff. Quesa tions relating to issues arising from this review are enclosed with this memo.

The licensee will be required to respond to these questions beforet we can com-plete our review. The review was performed y S. Block, RPS, RAB.

' William E. Kreger, Assist Director

/

l for Radiation Protecti Division of Systems Integration

Enclosure:

l As stated ccr D. Ross -

2 W. Houston .-

l

~ W. Gar.rnill  ! l H. Berkow /W. Russell 2 l T. Murphy - .- .

D. Collins -

B.J. Young 51ood R. Stark RPS Staff

_P 3" % _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _

iiippf _

• ~

• .h g

. ; .. . .. . v 2

-p ,  ;

}t(i Concurrent to the change request in 331.2 above, Figure .

• 13.1-3 should  %,

w*

also show that Health Physics technicians and Chemistry technicians di be separate groups, be qualified separately as Chemistry a Radia-tion Protection Technicians, and each report directly to their respective h Radiation Protection and Chemistry group managers. This change request is also in accordance with the aforementioned draft document. .. '*

$c Please describe your plan to provide backup coverage in the event of j g

.e.

31.4 '

7j sif the absence of the RPM and outline the qualifications of the individual '

M_

who will 'act as the backup. The December 1979 revision of ANSI 3.1 k specifies that the temporary replacement for an RPM should have a BS

. g<

degree in' science or engineering, 2 years experience in radiation protection,1 year of which should be nuclear power plant experience, i,

h hN 6 months of which should be on-site, I! ik,

- N 131.5 Section 13.1.2.3 specifying shift crew composition does not state that I%

H.P. technician will be onsite at all times (e.g.i including back-l@

. W an NUREG-0654 " Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation sR shift and weekends). m v;

of Radiological Emergency Response. Plans and Preparation in Support of '

T:

Nuclear Power Plants" requires that a radiation pro'tection technician, , ,c fs L

-whose qualifications are described in ANSI 18.1, shall be onsite at il aT1 times.

Section 13.1.2.3, as written, would allow a designated e

'~

member of the shift crew (e.g., reactor operator) to act as aihealth

~ i

..e.

physicstechnic'ianifheisqualifiedtoimpicmentradiationjrotection procedures. It should be noted that this qualification is no longer Only an assigned .

ccptable to the staff after the reactor is at power.

c:

i ,

health physics technician will be acceptable based on new staff requ r i d accordingly. [3 h=rr r 3--71 9 7 Thould be rev se _

,s o,