ML20213D547
| ML20213D547 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 02/02/1981 |
| From: | Kreger W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Tedesco R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20213D283 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-21 NUDOCS 8103040765 | |
| Download: ML20213D547 (2) | |
Text
__
. h..,
,e
.$.9!*",*.4, UNillD sl AT Es
~~ h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 8.'
i wasniucion. o. c. mss a
4 a
FEB ' ' 1981 DOCKET NOS:
50-483 7
.and 50-486
+.
e 4
s HEMORANDUM FOR: Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director
~
for Licensing, DL William E. Kreger, Assistant Director FROM:
for Radiation Protection, OSI SUSJECT:
- CALLAWAY - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Plant Name: Callaway 1 and 2.
Licensing Stage: OL Docket Number:
50-483/486 LBil; R. Sta'rk, LPM Request for additional information based on FSAR review Responsible Branch:
Description of Response:
Review Status: Continuing The Radiological Assessment Branch has reviewed the Snupps - Callaway i-adiation protection pro' gram as described in their FSAR with respec
~
criteria for utility management and technical competence of their staff. Quesa tions relating to issues arising from this review are enclosed with this memo.
The licensee will be required to respond to these questions beforet we can com-plete our review. The review was performed y S. Block, RPS, RAB.
William E. Kreger, Assist Director for Radiation Protecti
/
l Division of Systems Integration l
Enclosure:
As stated ccr D. Ross l
2 W. Houston
~ W. Gar.rnill l
H. Berkow /W. Russell l
2 T. Murphy D. Collins B.J. Young 51ood R. Stark RPS Staff iiippf
_P 3" % _
- ~
- .h g
v 2
-p
}t (i
Concurrent to the change request in 331.2 above, Figure 13.1-3 should
%,di also show that Health Physics technicians and Chemistry technicians w*
be separate groups, be qualified separately as Chemistry a Radia-h tion Protection Technicians, and each report directly to their respective Radiation Protection and Chemistry group managers. This change request
$c is also in accordance with the aforementioned draft document.
Please describe your plan to provide backup coverage in the event of j g
.e.
31.4 the absence of the RPM and outline the qualifications of the individual 7j sif M_
The December 1979 revision of ANSI 3.1 k
who will 'act as the backup.
specifies that the temporary replacement for an RPM should have a BS
- . g<
degree in' science or engineering, 2 years experience in radiation h
protection,1 year of which should be nuclear power plant experience, i,
h N 6 months of which should be on-site, I! ik, 131.5 Section 13.1.2.3 specifying shift crew composition does not state that N
I %
l @
H.P. technician will be onsite at all times (e.g.i including back-W an NUREG-0654 " Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation sR shift and weekends).
mv; of Radiological Emergency Response. Plans and Preparation in Support of T:
fs Nuclear Power Plants" requires that a radiation pro'tection technician,
,,c
-whose qualifications are described in ANSI 18.1, shall be onsite at L
il Section 13.1.2.3, as written, would allow a designated aT1 times.
e'~
member of the shift crew (e.g., reactor operator) to act as aihealth
~
i physicstechnic'ianifheisqualifiedtoimpicmentradiationjrotection
..e.
It should be noted that this qualification is no longer procedures.
Only an assigned ccptable to the staff after the reactor is at power.
c:
i health physics technician will be acceptable based on new staff requ i
d accordingly.
[3 h=rr r 3--71 9 7 Thould be rev se
,s o,