|
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20069L2091983-04-22022 April 1983 Supplemental Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069L1991983-04-22022 April 1983 Interrogatories & Document Request.Related Correspondence ML20071D2941983-03-0303 March 1983 Supplemental Response to 820621 Interrogatories on Contention 6.2,transmitting Form for Recording Continuous Type Releases.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083Q3931983-02-22022 February 1983 Motion to Permit Entry on Licensee Controlled Land to Observe 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise from Control Rooms & near-site Emergency Operations Facility ML20065C2111983-02-22022 February 1983 Motion to Permit Entry Upon Land Controlled by Licensees & to Allow Observance of 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise from Both Units 2 & 3 Control Rooms & from near-site Emergency Operations Facility ML20028C8671983-01-0707 January 1983 Response to Licensee 821203 Ltr Requesting Supplemental Responses to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20064C4481982-12-30030 December 1982 Suppl to Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20070L5471982-12-24024 December 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories Under Commission Question 1 ML20070L5491982-12-22022 December 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Under Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20070F7581982-12-17017 December 1982 Supplementation of Interrogatory Response,Naming Question 1 Witnesses.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069Q5231982-12-0707 December 1982 Supplemental Response to Interrogatories on Commission Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069P7641982-12-0606 December 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20067B1761982-12-0303 December 1982 Response to 820716 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 1 & 2 ML20067B2391982-12-0202 December 1982 Response to Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Related Correspondence ML20028B2981982-11-24024 November 1982 Replies to 820718 Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20028B4011982-11-22022 November 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20066J2611982-11-19019 November 1982 Responses to Interrogatories & Document Requests on Commission Question 2,Contention 2.2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20066J0411982-11-19019 November 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028A0491982-11-0303 November 1982 Response to 820526 Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Question 6.Interrogatories Received on 821015 ML20058D5921982-07-23023 July 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Question 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058G5211982-07-23023 July 1982 Response to Final Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Question 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5681982-07-21021 July 1982 Response to 8206221 Interrogatories,Objecting to Interrogatories 1-11 as Irrelevant,Beyond Scope of Permissible Discovery & Beyond Scope of Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5791982-07-20020 July 1982 Response to Second Round of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055B8621982-07-19019 July 1982 Interrogatory on Question 2,Contention 2.2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069C8621982-07-19019 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on Board Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20055A9981982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055A9961982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 1 & 2 ML20055A9901982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Question 1 ML20063E4491982-07-0707 July 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories on Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054L5771982-07-0202 July 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories on Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L7991982-07-0101 July 1982 Addl Response to Interrogatories Under Commission Questions 3 & 4 Per ASLB 820625 Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5201982-07-0101 July 1982 Supplemental Response to Licensee 820503 Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054M1791982-06-30030 June 1982 Reply to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054L5501982-06-30030 June 1982 Supplementary Responses to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054J9301982-06-25025 June 1982 Final Response to Util Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054J5871982-06-25025 June 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H8901982-06-24024 June 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20054H8941982-06-24024 June 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J1221982-06-22022 June 1982 Response to Ucs/Ny Pirg Requests for Admissions.Details Surrounding TMI-2 Accident Would Require Burdensome & Oppressive Research.Affidavits & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J1471982-06-21021 June 1982 Interrogatories on Contention 6.2.Related Correspondence ML20054H5661982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054H5411982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H5301982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H2601982-06-17017 June 1982 Reply to NRC 820526 Interrogatories ML20054F9801982-06-16016 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Re ASLB Contention 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H6081982-06-16016 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Question 6 ML20054H2631982-06-16016 June 1982 Reply to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories,Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054H5811982-06-16016 June 1982 Response to West Branch Conservation Assoc Supplementary Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20054H5881982-06-16016 June 1982 Response to Ucs/Ny Pirg Supplementary Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054F6251982-06-14014 June 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl 1983-04-22
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARJPN-99-029, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors1999-09-20020 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20212E4181999-09-15015 September 1999 Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting OL for Unit 2 Be Modified or Suspended to Prevent Restart Until Reasonable Assurance That Licensee in Substantial Compliance with Terms of OL & Has Proper Consideration for Public Health & Safety JPN-99-022, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds1999-06-22022 June 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds ML20202J6321999-01-20020 January 1999 Transcript of 990120 Meeting in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning.Pp 1-132.With Related Documentation ML20198E9721998-12-21021 December 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities. Orders That Wh Clark Prohibited for 1 Yr from Engaging in NRC-Licensed Activities JPN-98-052, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects1998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects ML20198L2731998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting NEI Re Proposed Rules 10CFR50, 52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments JPN-98-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal ML20155F4561998-08-26026 August 1998 Demand for Info Re False Info Allegedly Provided by Wh Clark to Two NRC Licensees.Nrc Considering Whether Individual Should Be Prohibited from Working in NRC-licensed Activities for Period of 5 Yrs ML20238F5271998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 IA-98-261, Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-461998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5241998-05-0606 May 1998 Transcript of 980506 Enforcement Conference Held in King of Prussia,Pa Re Con Edison,Indian Point.Pp 1-75 JPN-97-037, Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated1997-12-0101 December 1997 Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated ML20148M6471997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Porposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems ML20133N0511997-01-0505 January 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Draft Policy Statement on Resturcturing & Economic Deregulation of Electric Util Industry ML20149M4621996-12-0909 December 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Draft Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation of Electric Utility Industry ML20077G3481994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Nuclear Power License Renewal ML20070P0561994-04-19019 April 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NRC Draft Policy Statement on Use of Decommissioning Trust Funds Before Decommissioning Plan Approval ML20029C5771994-03-11011 March 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Draft Rule on Decommissioning.Informs That 15 Mrem/Yr Unreasonably Low Fraction of Icrp,Ncrp & Regulatory Public Dose Limit of 100 Mrem/Yr ML20059C3031993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Definition of Commercial Grade Item ML20045H8751993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports Rule ML20045F2451993-06-28028 June 1993 Comment on Proposal Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning NRC-licensed Facilities.Opposes Proposed Criteria ML20044F5681993-05-20020 May 1993 Comment on Draft Commercial Grade Dedication Insp Procedure 38703,entitled Commercial Grade Procurement Insp. Endorses NUMARC Comments Dtd 930517 JPN-02-034, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl JPN-91-021, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants1991-05-13013 May 1991 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants JPN-91-005, Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended1991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended ML20066G4411991-01-23023 January 1991 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Substantive Typo in 901015 Filing on Behalf of Licensee Noted ML20058G6341990-10-30030 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program JPN-90-068, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS1990-10-22022 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS JPN-90-067, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20065H7541990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 on Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Commission Assessment of Four Alternatives Should Be Expanded to Include Not Only Safety Considerations But Other Atomic Energy Act Objectives JPN-90-052, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR1990-07-0909 July 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR JPN-90-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary1990-07-0202 July 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary ML20012C6491990-03-0909 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events. Any Utilization of NRC Proposed Application of Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2,would Be Inappropriate W/O re-evaluation by NRC ML20005F6521989-12-13013 December 1989 Comment on Proposed Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Concurs w/industry-wide Position Presented by NUMARC & Offers Addl Comments ML20246P6061989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Significant & Independent Industry Efforts Already Underway to Address Issue ML20245K1941989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V9011989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Supports NUMARC Position.Proposed Rule Will Hinder Important Initiatives to Improve Maint JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20205L8521988-10-21021 October 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Cleaning or Disposing of Nuclear Waste.Incineration of Radwaste Oil Should Not Be Allowed JPN-88-015, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site1988-04-18018 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site JPN-88-002, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed1988-01-25025 January 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed JPN-87-062, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex1987-12-31031 December 1987 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex JPN-87-053, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection1987-10-15015 October 1987 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection JPN-87-051, Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl1987-09-28028 September 1987 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl ML20235Y9911987-07-20020 July 1987 Notice of Issuance of Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 Re Emergency Planning for School Children in Vicinity of Indian Point.* Request to Suspend OLs Denied ML20151C5061987-02-18018 February 1987 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning ML20093H6421984-10-15015 October 1984 Comments on Staff Presentation at Commission 841002 Meeting. Commission Should Conclude Proceedings Due to Inescapable Conclusion That Facility Safe to Operate & Poses No Undue Risk to Public.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098D2721984-09-26026 September 1984 Comments on Commission 840905 Meeting Re Facilities,Per Sj Chilk 840911 Memo.Licensee Agrees W/Staff That Further Mitigative Features or Plant Shutdown Unnecessary Due to Low Risk.Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
- ,
ro , -rn conRESPONDMb 00CKETED USNRC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,_, , ,_ GC_.-Taui ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD ,"
Before Administrative Judges:
James P. Gleason, Chairman Frederick J. Shon Dr. Oscar H. Paris
)
In the Matter of )
)
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. ) Docket Nos.
(Indian Point, Unit No. 2) ) 50-247 SP
) 50-286 SP POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK )
(Indian Point, Unit No. 3) ) Nov. 19, 1982
)
LICENSEES' RESPONSES TO WEST BRANCH CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION'S INTERROGATORY ON QUESTION 2, CONTENTION 2.2 Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. SS 2.740b and 2.741 (1982), the Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and the Power Authority of the State of New York, licensees, hereby submit these responses to best Branch Conservation Association's interrogatories and document requests concerning the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Question 2.
Brent L. Brandenburg Charles Morgan, Jr.
Paul F. Colarulli Joseph J. Levin, Jr.
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY MORGAN ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED OF NEW YORK, INC. 1899 L Street, N.W.
4 Irving Place Washington, D.C. 20036 New York, New York 10003 (202) 466-7000 (212) 460-4600 i
8211230488 821119 PDR ADOCK 05000247PDR G
l GJsos
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRELIMINARY MATTEkS.................................. 1 II. RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES......................... 2
l 4
PRELIMINARY MATTEhS In several instances the West Branch Conservation Association (WBCA) has'made requests for documents. In accordance with 10 C.F.R. Part 2, the licensees are pre-pared, while reserving any claims of privilege or other ob3ections to such production, to produce for inspection and copying documents requested under Commission Question 2 at a time mutually convenient to the licensees and WBCA.
In addition, because the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has rejected its contentions 2.2(c) and 2.2(d), see i
Memorandum and Order (Restating contentions and establishing procedures based on Commission guidance) at 41 (Oct. 1, 1982), the licensees have declined to respond to the WBCA interrogatories which pertain to these contentions.
1
l 2-RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES WBCA Interrogatory No. 2.2 a) - 1:
What is the status of the Hudson River Study on elimi-nating the use of Hudson River water for cooling? Refer to letter of John O'Toole of Coned (sic) to Victor Stello of NRC of January 27, 1981.
Response to Interrogatory No. 2.2 a) - 1:
The study referred to was for the purpose of identifying feasible alternatives for Indian Point Unit 2 to the present direct, river water-cooled containment cooling system. Its purpose was not to eliminate the use of Hudson River water for plant cooling, but rather to study a
" closed" cooling water system for the containment fan coolers.
The status of the study is as follows.
- 1) The study by our consultant is completed and identified a preferred alternative, the so-called " hybrid" closed cooling system. See Attachment to Letter from John D. O'Toole to Victor Stello (Jan. 27, 1981).
- 2) The company evaluated this alternative in comparison to the presently-installed system.
- 3) Our conclusion is that the hybrid system as proposed, although possessing the advantage of a " closed" system during normal plant operation, is complex in
3-comparison to the present system. See Letter from John D.
O'Toole to Victor Stello (Feb. 11, 1982).
- 4) he are continuing our studies of alternatives. Our future actions will be guided by the performance of the present system and the results of our surveillance program of the fan cooler units and service water piping.
WBCA Interrogatory No. 2.2 a) - 2:
If not ready, or in draft from, give date when the report will be available.
Response to Interrogatory No. 2.2 a) -
2:
See Response to WBCA Interrogatory No. 2.2 a) - 1.
WBCA Interrogatory No. 2.2 a) - 3:
If complete, provide a copy for our use.
Response to Interrogatory No. 2.2 a) - 3:
See Preliminary Matters.
WBCA Interrogatory No. 2.2 a) - 4:
Beside [ sic] the replacement of the fan cooler coils and nearby piping, have any other changes been made to miti-gate the corrosion of the river water systems?
Response to Interrogatory No. 2.2 a) - 4:
Indian Point Unit 2 Yes. Average water velocities in fan cooler units (FCU's) are being maintained at higher levels than they were prior to the fan cooler replacement. This reduces the tendency for silt to accumulate in the tubing. Pits in the tubing of the removed FCU's were observed to be related to
silt accumulations on the lower inner surfaces of the tubing. In addition, flow distribution baffles are being installed in each fan cooler unit inlet header to improve velocity distribution in the tubes. A performance surveillance program is also in place. The cement lining of carbon steel service water piping was repaired and an inspection and preventative maintenance program has been implemented.
Indian Point Unit 3 The fan cooler coils and nearby piping have been replaced with corrosion-resistant materials.
WbCA Interrogatory ho. 2.2 a) - 5 to PASNY only:
What are the materials used in replacement work for the fan cooler units, alloy designation and nominal analysis:
- a. cooler tubes
- b. coil fins
- c. coil casings
- d. coil tube sheets
- e. coil water box covers
- f. external piping
- g. welding rod if different from base metal.
Response to Interrogatory No. 2.2 a) - 5:
- a. ASTM B676, Class 2 -- Alloy UNSN08336 plus ASME Coce Case 1871 requirements.
- b. ASTM bl52 Alloy CDA 122.
- c. Not applicable.
- d. ASME SB620.
- e. ASME SB620.
- f. ASME SB619 Alloy UNS N08320 (Haynes Alloy 20 Mod.)
or SB625 Alloy UNS N08904. (904L) Rolled into pipe per ANSI B31.1 or ASME Section VIII, Division 1, or in accordance with ASTM B673.
- g. ASME SFA 5.11 Classification E Ni Cr Mo-1 and 5.14 Classification ER Ni Cr Mo-l. For the nominal analysis of these materials, see the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel (ASME B&PV) Code.
WBCA Interrogatory No. 2.2 a) - 6 to PASNY only:
What are the welding methods used for shop and field fabrication of coils and related piping?
Response to Interrogatory No. 2.2 a) - 6:
Weld procedures are in accordance with the ASME B&PV Code Sections Ili, IX and XI, which are proven industry standards used by both equipment manufacturers and various utilities for field repairs of heavy walled pressure vessels.
WBCA Interrogatory No. 2.2 b) - 1:
Provide a copy of recent Oak Ridge National Laboratory study on raciation embrittlement of reactor vessels.
Response to Interrogatory No. 2.2 b) - 1:
l A copy of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory study on radiation embrittlement of reactor vessels may be obtained from Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
L
6-WBCA Interrogatory No. 2.2 b) - 2:
What action is planned to mitigate the problem of embrittlement of the reactor vessels at Units 2 and 3?
Response to Interrogatory No. 2.2 b) -
2:
See Response to Staff Interrogatory Nos. 2 and 7 under Contention 2.2(b), Licensees' Responses to NRC Staff First Set of Interrogatories Concerning the Commission's Questions 1 and 2 (June 25, 1982).
WBCA Interrogatory No. 2.2 b) - 3:
When will mitigating measures be started?
Response to Interrogatory No. 2.2 b) -
3:
See Response to WBCA Interrogatory No. 2.2 b) - 2.
As to answers:
CONSOL A t; 'DI t OMP' OF t 'W YORK, INC.
By / /
t Ricnaro P. hem 3 haw \
Project Manager - Indian Point Hearings POWER AUTh0RI.TY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK By '
'he r s c ni!.L bpectef Project. Manager - Indian Point Hearings As to Objectior.s:
CONSOLID D E ISO COM. PAN OF NEW YORK, INC.
By ) , M W2Ae C>
Brent L. brancenburg Assistant General Coun 1 POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK MOtGAN A S C ES A ED ,
by C Ya ul F'. Colarulli \ '
Attorney for Power Authority of the State of New York
VERIFICATION STATE OF NEW YORK )
- SS.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
I, RICHARD P. REMSHAW, being duly sworn, depose and say:
That I am the Manager, Indian Point Hearings for Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., licensee of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 2; that I am authorized to make this verification on behalf of said corporation; and that the foregoing answers to interrogatories were prepared under my direction and supervision ano are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
/
/
RICHARD P. REMSHAW \ .
Sworn to before me this h aay of November, 1982 i Notary Puolic
- .,. Commission Expires June 14,19S7
VERIFICATION STATE OF NEW YORK )
- SS.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
I, HERSCHEL SPECTER, being duly sworn, depose and say:
That I am the Manager, Indian Point 3 Hearings, Technical Support for Power Authority of the State of New York, licensee of the Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant; that I am authorized to make this verification on behalf of said corporation; and that the foregoing answers to interrogatories were prepared under my direction and supervision and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information ana belief.
fr~ s' HERSCHEL SPECT@
Sworn to before me this th day of November, 1982 m r-Notary Public /
- \!y. Commi:3 ion Expim Joe i+,1937
espe tfully submit ,
r VL n }
Brent L.'Brandenburg - kSMarles" Morgan, Jr.
Paul F. Colarulli CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO ANY Joseph J. Levin, Jr.
OF NEW YORK, INC.
Licensee of Indian Point MORGAN ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED Unit 2 1899 L Street 4 Irving Place Washington, D.C. 20036 New York, New York 10003 (202) 466-7000 (212) 460-4600 Stephen L. Baum General Counsel Charles M. Pratt Assistant General Counsel POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Licensee of Indian Point Unit 3 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 (212) 397-6200 Bernard D. Fischman Michael Curley Richard Czaja David H. Pikus SHEA & GOULD 330 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10017 (212) 370-8000 Dated: November 19, 1982 l
l
4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:
James P. Gleason, Chairman Frederick J. Shon Dr. Oscar H. Paris
)
, In the Matter of )
)
- CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. ) Docket Nos.
(Indian Point, Unit No. 2) ) 50-247 SP
) 50-286 SP POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK )
(Indian "oint, Unit No. 3) ) Nov. 19, 1982
_)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 19th day of November, 1982, I caused a copy of the Licensees' Responses to West Branch Conservation Association's Interrogatory on Question 2, Contention 2.2 to be served by first class mail, postage prepaid on the following:
James P. Gleason, Chairman Charles M. Pratt, Esq.
Administrative Judge Stephen L. Baum, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Power Authority of the 513 Gilmoure Drive State of New York Silver Spring, Maryland 20901 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Mr. Frederick J. Shon Administrative Judge Janice Moore, Esq.
Atomic Safety ano Licensing Board Counsel for NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Office of the Executive Commission Legal Director Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Administrative Judge Brent L. Brandenburg, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Assistant General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Consolidated Edison Company Commission of New York, Inc.
Washington, D.C. 20555 4 Irving Place New York, New York 10003 Docketing and Service Branch Office of the Secretary Ellyn R. Weiss, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission William S. Jordan, III, Esq.
Washington, D. C . 20555 Harmon and Weiss 1725 I Street, N.W., Suite 506 Joan Holt, Project Director Washington, D.C. 20006 Indian Point Project New York Public Interest Research Charles A. Scheiner, Co-Chairperson Group , Westchester People's Action 9 Murray Street Coalition, Inc.
New York, New York 10007 P.O. Box 488 White Plains, New York 10602 Jeffrey M. Blum, Esq.
New York University Law School Alan Latman, Esq.
423 Vanderbilt Hall 44 Sunset Drive 40 Washington Square South Croton-On-Hudson, New York 10520 New York, New York 10012 Ezra I. Bialik, Esq.
Charles J. Maikish, Esq. Steve Leipzig, Esq.
Litigation Division Environmental Protection Bureau The Port Authority of New York New York State Attorney and New Jersey General's Office One World Trade Center Two World Trade Center New York, hew York 10048 New York, New York 10047 Alfred B. Del Bello Westchester County Executive Westchester County 148 Martine Avenue White Plains, New York 10601 Andrew S. Roffe, Esq.
New York State Assembly Albany, New York 12248 l
L
l Marc L. Parris, Esq. Atomic Safety and Licensing Eric Thorsen, Esq. Board Panel County Attorney U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission County of Rocklana Washington, D.C. 20555 11 New Hempstead Road New City, New York 10956 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel Pat Posner, Spokesperson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Parents Concerned About Indian Washington, D.C. 20555 Point P.O. Box 125 Honorable Richard L. Brodsky Croton-on-Hudson, New York 10520 Member of the County Legislature Westchester County Renee Schwartz, Esq. County Office Building Paul Chessin, Esq. White Plains, New York 10601 Laurens R. Schwartz, Esq.
Margaret Oppel, Esq. Zipporah S. Fleisher Botein, Hays, Sklar and Hertzberg West Branch Conservation 200 Park Avenue Association New York, New York 10166 443 Buena Vista Road New City, New York 10956 Honorable Ruth W. Messinger Member of the Council of the Mayor George V. Begany City of New York Village of Buchanan District #4 236 Tate Avenue City hall Buchanan, New York 10511 New York, New York 10007 Judith Kessler, Coordinator Greater New York Council Rockland Citizens for Safe Energy on Energy 300 New hemstead Road c/o Dean R. Corren, Director New City, New York 10956 New York University 26 Stuyvesant Street David H. Pikus, Esq. -
New York, New York 10003 Richard F. Czaja, Esq.
330 Madison Avenue Geoifrey Cobb Ryan New York, New York 10017 Conservation Committee Chairman Director, New York City Amanda Potterfield , Esq.
Audubon Society Johnson & George 71 West 23rd Street, Suite 1828 528 Iowa Avenue New York, New York 10010 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Lorna Salzman Ruthanne G. Miller, Esq.
Mid-Atlantic Representative Atomic Safety and Friends of the Earth, Inc. Licensing Board Panel 208 West 13th Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory New York, New York 10011 Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Stanley b. Klimberg, Esq.
General Counsel hew York State Energy Office 2 Rockefeller State Plaza Albany, New York 12223
Mr. Donald Davidoff Director, Radiological Emergency Preparedness Group Empire State Plaza Tower Building, Rm. 1750
- Albany, New York 12237 Craig Kaplan, Esq.
National Emergency Civil Liberties Committee 175 Fifth Avenue, Suite 712 New York, New York 10010 Michael D. Diederich, Jr., Esq.
Fitgerald, Lynch & Diederich 24 Central Drive Stony Point, New York 10980 Steven C. Sholly Union of Concerned Scientists 1346 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Suite 1101 Washington, D.C. 20036 Spence W. Perry Office of General Counsel Federal Emergency Management Agency 500 C Street, S.W. ,
Washington, D.C. 20472 Stewart M. Glass Regional Counsel Room 1349 Federal Emergency Management Agency 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10278 Melvin Goldberg Staff Attorney New York Public Interest Research Group 9 Murray Street New York, New York 10007 Jonathan L. Levine, Esq.
P. O. Box 280 New City, New York 10958 Paul F. Colarulli
.. _.-