ML20126H833

Requests Memorandum Stating That Analysis in Bk Grimes 810309 Memo Is Valid for Units 1 & 2.Also Requests Info Re Location of Backup Emergency Operation Facility & Manning Chart

ML20126H833
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	04/14/1981
From:	Tedesco R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Pagano F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
References
NUDOCS 8104220023
Download: ML20126H833 (1)

Text

. - . -- - _ . . - - . .- - - - - - .

$\t '

f f f ff ,

g /U RL6L i U M  !

57 g n 1 5 19 B F h

h. e , l APR j 4 1981 \p **@+ se c i s os MEMORANDlM FOR: Frank G. Pagano, Acting Chief I Emergency Preparedness Pmgram Office l

FROM: Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director l i

for Licensing DL j 1

SUBJECT:

POST-TMI REQUIREENTS FOR THE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY l l

References:

(1) Letter from D. E. Eisenhut to all licensees dated 1 February 18,1981 (attached). f l

! (2) Letter from F. L. Clayton, Alabama Power Company, ]

1 Senior Vice President, to NRC dated April 6,1981 (attached) I t

(3) Memorandum fmm B. K. Grimes to R. L. Tedesco dated l l March 9,1981.  :

I I i Refemnce (1) required a general msponse from all licensees within 45 days i concerning(new Reference 2) is theguidelines response from for upgrading Alabama Power emergency Company support facilities.

to reference (1). l During this time frame, Farley Unit-2 was being licensed and the require- i ments of reference (1) were reviewed in reference (3). Unfortunately, the l conclusions of reference (3) under III. A.1.2. Upgrade Emergency Support Facilities, only state the analysis is valid for Farley Unit-2. Logically, l Farley Unit 1 is covemd by the analysis but a mnmorandum is needed stating i the analysis is valid for both units. i Also, there am two questions concerning the analysis and the existing mquire-  !

ments. If the Energency Operations Facility (EOF) is located within 10 miles i

of the plant, a backup facility is mquired. The Farley EOF will be within j a mile of the plant. Although the backup EOF does not need to be a dedicated -

facility, should its location be fimly'estabitsbed or can it be a variable  !

location? The backup EOF location is not listed in the Farley plan. Second, I would you verify the manning chart supplied in reference (2) is consistent i with the agreements made with the Alabama Power Company since it is slightly I different from the standard chart provided in mference (1). I i

DISTRIBUTION _  !

Docket NRC PDR o Central File)

Local PDR /I LB#2 File DEisenhut Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Licensing DL p t

RPurple Licensing Project Manager

!' Attachments: RTedesco Licensing Assistant becks A Ci (16) f' /bp  !

As stated ASchwencer I&E (3)

SIC

( ee nm m..

ERA '

1

< e"d.L,B#2 ,, LB,9, , ,,,,,

,A , , ,,,,, , , ,,, ,, ,, ,,,,,,,,, , , , , , , , , j i i -> . ..Jh,,{,,:,,s,,p,,,ASc,h, ,ncer RT, s co, ,,,,,, , ,,,, , , , , ,, ,, , ,,,,,, ,,,,, ,,, , , , , ,, ,,, , , ,,,  !

. W j s1 ,,,, ,,gy/81

,,4,/,pf,81 ,,,, ,, ,, , , ,,,, , , ,,,,,,,,,,,,., , ,, .., ,, , ,,, ..

. ~7 mgggg3 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY me y2x  ;

c_ - - - . - -------- --

- s. P00R ORIGINAL ci,

~

. UNITED s TA i Es ~f ', . ... .

, ,C  %^

'. / ** , ' t.'UC L E A R F 5 G U L t TC P Y CO'.",11$ 510N ,

,'y v .:,'i e. G T O N 0.C.2 555 - 4t V a

' y' . ,/.4 c '

/

t '.dg/

u .. - .e

,$,se<.

c. :, a- v- F- 1

,i. -i.i.

ii r."S::.S c n:. n : r. .?.

w.. :"i . ". . "> M.a", S i .

e"",D n. ...'r:t. C: C ' K. . :' sW

.. . . . i.:-: " ' I S SUEJECT: POST-TMI REQUIREME'iTS FOR THE EME 3E';CY C?E:aTIC';5 FACILITi (3E!!E:.!C LETTER 81-10)

Gentieran:

Cn October 31, 1950, the i;RC staff sent ycu a clarification letter ('C:ES-0737) re:arding a:pr ved TMI Action Plan items which deferred clarificatien of iter III.A.l.2, ": grade Emergency Support Facilities. The tcmissi:n has new finalized it's pcsition with respect to loca. ion and habitability ra:; ire . ants f:r the Er:3rgency Operations Facility and staffing levels for emergency In the naar future, situations. Clarification en these issues is enclosed.

we expect to issue further guidance for emergency resecr.se facilities in connecticn with finalization of ;UREG-C595. Imple entati:n se.361es for related iters affected by the issuance of !!UREG-0695 will be set for:n at that time. /

It is expected that tne recuirements c;ntair.ed herein will te cet. A :c : rdi r..:1 you are requested to furnish, within forty-five (45) days of this letter, ccofirmation that the iirpletintation dates indicated in Enclosure 1 will be met. For any date t.h at cannot be met, furnish a preposed revised date, and justification for the delay.

This request for information was approved by GA0 under a blar.ket clearance number 20072 which expires f;ovember 30, 1983. Corrrients on burden and duplication may be directed to the U. S. General Accounting Office, 2C549. egulatory F.eports P.eview, Room 5106, 441 G Street,ti. W., Washington, D. C.

Sincerely, s

(

bYarrell MU.0,'W)

G.lEisenhut, Director ,

Division of Licensing Office of !!uclear Reactor F.e';ulation

Enclosures:

As Stated cc: Service List with Enclosures y.

p8e RM kg m n gk,E

,p [aw

'# ****8.=q!g o -y < ,y

.e, , -g

7 ..

9 e; i

", o , , _ ,

4 .:ir:.~

... ,.f... . _//.__/..<.Q/, z l,

- .: .: .s

-; t. . .c y

, . . .- u .- .,

L-- a 1.%->. hIhlC.3 P:',yCi

...... -e., . g.-

L;ril 6, 1 H1

/- ./

f-0e}l I '

% : bet 5~s *: LB v i'J- 2 5 $

' re-

t,r, h :icar .Reict:r Fe;sia tion U. 5. 'i,:*.c e r F.ep11 tory C:rri:s f on

.stie;t:n, D. C.  ??555 i tite nt i ca.:  % 5. A. Var;6 Mr. A. T. 5:n-encer l l

Ce.: M en: .r J: s e;P M . Ta r ay 'lu:'. c a r F l a r.t '.'n i t s 1 a n d 2 Unra din: of Er::rgency 5 2,mrt Fe:ilities In resp .se to M.r. D. G. Eiscnhut's letter of Feb rua ry 19, iisi, A At.ica F; ear Cor;2ny has prf:m?d a revie, of the crit 2ri'a ::ntei ed ,

ir. the ab:ve referenced letter.

alehni Fe-er Cortpar.y has established en c:erati0nal technical s:/;: rt certer (ISC) which is in close pr:xic'ty to the c:nt-ol roo- .

7 e !!" hai ;'.e c2pability to display 1.d transsit : lent status to those irdivida15 incwledgeable of end responsitie for engineering and n:na;e-

r. int sup;crt cf reactor e cratiens in the event of an accident. The TSC is !!bitabit ta the sa e degree es the centrol rox. for postulated accident concitions. The Farley %: lear Plant Enersen:y, Plan has been revised to f recr;; rate the role and location of the '50. The TSC contains a set of FHO's for e:ch unit and te:hnical n:nvals on selected c.1jor equip ant. ,

C . tic te: 5nical data are readily available frz the document control f 6;Hity in the clant Service Euilding wMch cay be reached by ir.traplant r o,e from tee 75C. Also Svailable in the TSC are the Energency Plan, E Argen:y 712n Jrpie,+nting Frocedures, Ainor .21 Operating ?co:edures, E. -ergency Operating Procedures and Unit 0,,eratir.; Fro:edures along with .

otter 9er.eral referer.:e r.aterial.

f l at t. .: F t er Cc :3cy has also established t.n c:erational supp;rt -

cin'.er (CSC) functionally seperate f rom the co . trol roo*, ar.d other ener;ency

-es:e se facilities. Cownicatier.s have beer, provided from the OSC to t e T5C, EOF, and control room .

~ 1 w(0 p

g S tbuewm u

• 4 "

P00R

. - .. . . . - - _ _ . - _QRIG.INAL . . .

\

-.. .. ._