ML20127F896
| ML20127F896 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1984 |
| From: | LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127B509 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-123 NUDOCS 8506250285 | |
| Download: ML20127F896 (72) | |
Text
f i
(
l f
I LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY WATERFORD 3 SES PRESENTATION OF OPERATIONAL READINESS G
~
DECEMBER,1984 waaronosu f0(k-95~)L3 j ._
DCS Cof f
i ns. -
i B/I hh625 5 850411 BERNABE85-123 pyg
f e ,
d, ,,e y ,
, 'g' 3gg .
.%? .e.1(p'g;
');f E .gik:
-7, ;gi.: t. h. ,
a.wg - .sg',
- sk,t(l\hj
~,$;,; $,%g$%" !!u :k 'k ii '
unp
, a . .
, ui,p . . a.k . \ hn a ... ": A - qv.
- t%: -
4
- nL yn p.
- ;g. i;59 pjgg- r,% y't.p ;4>.".
- =
v1.>
. . . :- r 4st< :.7 ,
y, u 1,4, a .;. l.+ -> t,a ..', ;p.a
\
- . < n. . , . .
, f.
\
- : x;, $
- .C i
r e
, . i ., nt;, c:- ,, -
/
' fs [ 4
) ., d l /
'i .
b.g: j G:. Qg,
- ,
- ' e%.
(Mlg S
a v _g$ y u .) e%
\ ,. ?
,;p ,
s n t .
, 4
, . . g.
I ) >s ,f I j . ,, ,,%,
g.
\. , , : :,
.. ..i ) :'.
l .y ~ y'th l ' ,.' $
{ ,, , p .. . .
, . 'j, ,
> ), . ' .
o . .r' m
g'. Jg\ ;;:
., f .-
Q .
L , r, - g' w . .
k\ l l3, M yfic ,
,c
[
Q .-
\ ;,,- (
g1 1
v .
- m. e bp:'A11p[.y, 4/
is
~
'i@ i . 1 ... ..
.fi .
si f.
TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT /0PERATING PHILOSOPHY M AN AGEMENT INVOLVEMENT
\' -
NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE OF KEY MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE AVAILABLE IN SUPPORT OF WATERFORD 3 OPERATION AL READINESS PLAN L
ORGANIZATION CHARTS
~
WE ARE READY MILESTONES .
SIGNIFICANT PLANT FEATURES DESIGN COMPARISON GENERAL LICENSING STATUS ANTICIPATED LICENSE CONDITIONS COMMON BASEMAT CRACKS NRid 23 ISSUES JOINT INTERVENORS MOTION ON QA AND MANAGEMENT
}
. CAT PLANT ORGANIZATION TR AINING STATUS OPERATING SHIFT EXPERIENCE SHIFT MAKEUP / DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES PLANT ACTIVITY STATUS / - ) .,
EMERGENCY PLANNING
!4 INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW PLANT SPECIFIC SIMULATOR {i "
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY / TRAINING CENTER
m,. _,_ ,- a a _ . .-- - ,,, m_ -_ A - , - -
_A__xAe e
4 e
e t
i -
MANAGEMENT /0PERATING PHILOSOPHY t -
t E
eh .
i.
i .
N I
I f -m s w+
l4' l
b
1 MANAGEMENT /0PERATING PHILOSOPHY e SAFETY OF OPERATION COMES FIRST t
e PROPER STEWARDSHIP M11ST BE EXERCISED e LP8L MANAGERS IN CONTROL AND COMMONLY FOCUSED e CHECKS AND BALANCES NEEDED AND IN-PLACE f e ACTIVELY SEEK AND ADDRESS ANY CONCERNS fe OPEN, CANDID AND COOPERATIVE WITH ASSOCIATED AGENCIES I
t%1
.d 'l 4 1
u
i e,
- l. .
e ,
i i
- g. *
- g M ANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT e
s em
/
, t . .
I i'
,k/
) .~ -
t I
i ' \
/
e 4
h i
1 -
E MT
- .I,, ' !
, 2 .
5 i /" !
I f
l t
MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT
.. BOARD OF DIRECTORS ,
f' NUCLEAR OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE l.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
.. e REGULAR INVOLVEMENT e MONTHLY PROJECT REVIEW MEETINGS
~
e PARTICIPATES IN KEY LICENSING MEETINGS AND MEETINGS WITH NRC MANAGEMENT e DIRECT INVOLVEMENT IN RESOLUTION OF NRC 23. ISSUES SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT - NUCLEAR OPERATIONS s DAILY INVOLVEMENT - 0FFICE T SITE MANAGEMENT RE0RGANIZATION
~
e STRENGTHENED MANAGEMENT s BROUGHT IN NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE e SHAPED ORGANIZATION FOR EFFICIENT PROJECT COMPLETION e PREPARED FOR OPERATION I f' a,n
?- .
u
i F
e' ,
4
[
4
/
/ v f *,
NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE , ,
0F
_ KEY' MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS N
b O-0 C
ah ,,
e t -
i N '
W I i g e.
O
?
, ~3 t
J f
'---% E :iIi H i
t
- NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE i OF KEY MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS TOTAL YEARS 1 t
NUCLEAR
. TITLE. .
EXPERIENCE
~ ~
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT-NUCLEAR OPERATIONS 31 i PROJECT MANAGER 5 NUCLEAR SERVICES MANAGER 11
'~
- PLANT MANAGER -
15 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER 12 ASSISTANT TO PROJECT MANAGER 23 7
L NUCLEAR SUPPORT & LICENSING MANAGER 20 EMERGENCY PLANNING MANAGER 6
_ ! x 10 ENGINEERING & NUCLEAR SAFETY MANAGER
~
LICENSING MANAGER 20 20 ASSISTANT PLANT MANAGER-0PERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I
I 5 ASSISTANT PLANT MANAGER-TECHNICAL SERVICES.
13 f TRAINING MANAGER 8
3 4
O
++
I h
6 e
- b e L
a NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE AVAILABLE IN SUPPORT OF WATERFORD 3 PN g- .
-..A ,
(
i
\
1
.k,5,.
\
\
V el e l 10 Jcn
NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE AVAILABLE IN SUPPORT OF WATERFORD 3 i SENIOR VICE-PRESIDENT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS 1/1 31 1
NUCLEAR SERVICES PROJECT WANAGEMENT l QUALITY ASSURANCE 336 232 43s l23/36 l36/39 l44/so i
1 l
TOTAL i 104/136 1,038 DEGREE / TOTAL TOTAL NUCLEAR PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE l
DOES NOT INCLUDE PLANT STAFF, CONTRACTORS, OR CLERICAL PERSONNEL
3 e
te ,
- n. +
f h.
OPERATIONAL READINESS PLAN
> ee 9
l-
== A ,
-- i N
64 g
>-en 0
2
, ~3
% a\.
,4 4 /
(k j,J Ii M L-.
OPERATIONAL READINESS PLAN
.I STAGES
, READINESS FOR FUEL LOAD I
READINESS FOR INITIAL CRITICALITY AND POWER ASCENSION READINESS FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATION
}
FUNCTIONAL AREAS COVERED IN THE STAGES PLANT OPERATIONS
. QUALITY ASSURANCE STARTUP PRE 0PERATIONAL TESTING REGULATORY / LICENSING .. .
r- ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS
! NUCLEAR FUEL ENGINEERING
~~
CONSTRUCTION RECORDS EMERGENCY PLANNING
! LEGAL, FINANCIAL AND COMMERCIAL-MILESTONES l
THE OPERATIONAL READINESS PLAN PRESENTS A PLANNED APPROACH
- TO CERTIFY THAT ALL MAJOR REQUIREMENTS AND CRITERIA ARE I SATISFIED ~THROUGH THE STAGES TO COMMERCIAL OPERATION
e g
em
,l.
ORGANIZATION CHARTS e-d
- A ,
f x -
1
- e4 b
l .
l j mrtoos g A% .
e o; b .
. -g I SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT-NUCLEAR OPERATIONS ,
l R.S. LEDDICK l .
NUCLEAR SERVICES PLANT MANAGER PR,0 JECT MANAGER 1
IQUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER MANAGER I
LP&L PROJECT STAFFING-CURRENT PERIOD: 573 AUTHORIZED: 622
i i t i i .
k a *er.
}
PROJECT MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT TO I PROJECT MANAGER ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION j RECORDS &
COMMERCIAL I NUCLEAR SAFETY I ADMINISTRATION
' i i I .i i I e i i i i ! ; r i ;
NUCLEAR SERVICES
/ MANAGER ,
l __
~
NU E^ ^NN EMERGENCY COST AND NUCLEAR SUPPORT CHANGE SPECIAL LUATIO *
& LICENSING MANAGEMENT PROJECTS PLANNING BUDGETS ASSURANCE f
i l
i
- i i ,
3 ; i ( , i i ,
-g.
AUTHORIZED POSITIONS: 424
. CURRENT STAFFING: 399 VACANT POSITIONS: 25 PLANT MANAGER-NUCLEAR t
PLANT OPERATIONS PLANT ADMINISTRATIVE PLANT TECHNICAL QUALITY CONTROL PLANT TRAINING
& MAINTENANCE SERVICES SERVICES AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED POSITIONS: 212 POSITIONS: 13 POSITIONS: 69 POSITIONS: 32 P,0SITIONS: 96 CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT STAFFING 199 STAFFING 13 STAFFING 64 STAFFING 28 STAFFING 93 L
VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT STAFFING 13 STAFFING 0 STAFFING S STAFFING 4 STAFFING 3 KEY VACANT KEY VACANT POSITIONS:
POSITIONS:
1 I&C SUPERVISOR 1 MECH. M AINT. SUP. TRNG. INST /0PERS (4) 2 UTIL. ENGR.
1 SHIFT SUPERVISOR 93% 100% 92% 88% 96%
'i i
- l .
S I
WE ARE READY O
e O
-l.
.~ s
.1 \
>ow e
i r,
=== ') . .
i ~k r-n
- J lJ I
a
. .1 . : ? A l, '; {'
l l
'et. F 144 I .
WE ARE READY e SITE SECURITY PLAN IMPLEMENTED e OPERATORS (R0/SRO) HAVE RECEIVED THEIR LICENSE
- e SYSTEMS REQUIRED FOR FUEL LOAD / POWER ASCENSION ACCEPTED BY PLANT STAFF l
e FINAL DRAFT OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ISSUED BY NRC STAFF e GPERATIONAL' READINESS PLAN IMPLEMENTED e ALL PROCEDURES REQUIRED FOR FUEL LOAD ARE APPROVED AND READY FOR IMPLEMENTATION t'~
e COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTED
, e TRAINING REQUIRED FOR FUEL LOAD COMPLETE g
e LICENSING COMMITMENTS REQUIRED FOR FUEL LOAD HAVE BEEN MET e EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLANS ARE IN PLACE l e EMERGENCY EXERCISE COMPLETED WITH FAVORABLE RESULTS i
e STAFFING WITH EXTENSIVE NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE - CORPORATE, l PLANT MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS l'
l l
t I _,
6 e
fa . -
ee
- 4 9
~
MILESTONES
.=g ea I1 4
i .e e
>m
+= A ,,
. 4 6
i i \
O re 6
\
l u
Mi s . . t I M--A-
f l
MILESTONES e CPhENDEREDDECEMBER,1970 o CP ISSUED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 e_ OL APPLICATION DOCKETED DECEMBER 18, 1978 e SER ISSUED' JULY, 1981 e ACRS LETTER SUPPORTING ISSUANCE OF OL MARCH, 1982 e COLD HYDRO COMPLETED DECEMBER, 1982 L.'
s HOTFUNCTIONALCOMPLETEDAPRI.Ld983 .
DMC REPORT RESULTS VERY FAVORABLE e
- e. LAST SER SUPPLEMENT (N0. 7) ISSUED SEPTEMBER, 1984 l-e CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED l e PROJECT IS FUEL LOAD READY I
e SENT LETTER TO NRC STAFF REQUESTING LICENSE CONDITIONED l TO ALLOW OPERATION TO 5% OF FULL POWER l
t
I t
f* . .
Oh lm.-
~
SIGNIFICANT PLANT FEATURES N
em MG re M g Y g
W w.
i N
e e
t [ "" 'T k*
rca
- u I I' m
,I .~
7 Tr . . r_,.
i
SIGNIFICANT PLANT FEATURES .
NUCLEAR PLANT ISLAND STRUCTURE I
PLANT COMPUTER
.mes
. =
I&
- t. .
.. A I
I_
.. , s T
l ,
Ai sy p,i T s
~
lt. ,, ~-
L- - -- , ,m - - - - - -
I e
e DESIGN COMPARISON e
...K e
(
i \
O e
4 i
41 cDir.
gr
. ~
i m .s =
4
D" med
'7+
- r.
1
[ INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW rm m
m p-L
.- ~ .
6 1.
_ i N e
l' I
l h
a "h l
.a.
N' k 'O e I J wum l
l
INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW e THE IDR PROGRAM FOR WATERFORD 3 WAS CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE .
WITH THE PROGRAM PLAN APPROVED BY THE NRC.BY WAY OF PRE-4 SENTATIONS, THE IDR. PROGRAM WAS REVIEWED, COMMENTED UPON, AND AGREED U.PON BY THE NRC. ,
~
e LP&L' EXPECTED THAT SOME DISCREPANCIES WOULD BE IDENTIFIED.IN THIS REVIEW DUE TO THE HIGH MAGNIFICATION USED BY TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY. THE NUMBER OF DISCREPANCIES (FOUR FINDINGS AND L TWENTY OBSERVATIONS) IDENTIFIED IS NOT ABNORMAL e CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE COMPLETE THEFINDINGSASDOBSERVATIONSWEREISOLATEDCASES j ,.
RESULTING CHANGES WERE MINOR IN NATURE NRC AUDITS OF THE PROGRAM HAVE BEEN CONDUCTED
. ALL CONCERNS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED-
[
'~
LP&L HAS FULFILLED THE COMMITMENT FOR AN 1DR AND OUR MUTUAL
_l OBJECTIVES HAVE BEEN MET L g' e! THE IDR OF THE EMERGENCY FEEDWATER SYSTEM HAS VERIFIED THE
-. OF THE DESIGN PROCESS LP&L'S CONFIDENCE THAT WATERFORD 3 IS A WELL DESIGNED AND BUILT PLANT HAS BEEN ENHANCED
'~
- FURTHERM0RE, LP&L IS CONFIDENT THAT WATERFORD 3 CAN BE SAFELY OPERATED e ALL FINDINGS, OBSERVATIONS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY THE NRC l
G *"
9 I
OPERATING SHIFT EXPERIENCE F ** e en
~~ % .
e e
i \
o<
e g f[b,il JL3 mH i -
OPERATING SHIFT EXPERIENCE DATE 10/26/84 Shift Supervisor PLANT NAMI W terford 3-SES JOB TITLE:
t!TILITY LP&L (NOTE 2) 0 L. DATE -%
NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EXPERIENCE ENTER DATA: MONTHS / MONTHS 1 WEIGHTINC FACTOR FOR OPERATINC SHIFT POSITIONS (NOTE 1)
WEICHTINC MAXIMlfM CREDIT I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to TYPE OF EXPERIENCE FACTOR
- 1. SAME TYPE COMMERCIAL SRO 1.00 NO LIMIT 21/21 e
- 2. OTHEA COMMERCIAL SRO 0.75 NO l'IMIT 1.00 NO LIMIT 34/34 6/6
- 3. SAME TYPE COMMERCIAL R0
- 4. OTHER COMMERCIAL RO 0.75 NO LIMIT 36 MONTHS
- 5. NAVY (MILITARY) NUCLEAR 83/ 64/32 1/.75 45/
(RO, EWS, E00W, PPWS) 0.50 0.25 20.8 96/24 22.5 (OTHER) 12 MONTHS
- 6. SIMULATOR (REFERENCE PLANT) 5.00 (12 MONTHS) 3.00 (9 MONTHS) 2.3 6 6.8 6.8 .8 6 (SIMILAR) 24 MONTHS
- 7. NUCLIAR PLANT EXPERIENCE ON SHIFT (OWN PLANT) 68/12 58/12 14/7 35/12 (LESS THAN I ) TR5 PRIOR TO F.L.) 0.75 (12 MONTHS) 12/6 59/12 e
0.50 (12 MONTHS) 12/9 12/9 12/9 12/9 12/9 12/9 (MORE THAN I i YRS PRIOR TO F.L.)
0.50 9 MONTHS 4.3 4.6 4.7 4.3 1.4 4.5
) 8. LICENSED CLASSknoM 1 RAINING AND EXAM (OWN PLANT) 0.75 12 MONTHS 1.9 1.9 1.9 21/12 1.9 ,
- 9. PAPTICIPATION AT OPERATING PLANT }6/12 0.25 12 MONTHS l
- 10. OTHER NUCLEAR PLANT EXPERIENCE II. CONDUCTING LICENSE TRAININC 0.25 9 MONTHS
- 12. DECRTE (ENGINEERINC. APPLIED SCIENCE OR EQUIVALENT) 12 MONTHS (BACHELORS DECREE) . (12 MONTilS)
(ASSOCIATES DECFEE) (6 MONTHS) 7.4 4.5 5.5 4.8 4.2 4.7 TOTAL NUCLEAR PLANT EXPERIENCE: YEARS HOT PARTICIPATION EXPERIENCE
>6 >6 >6 >6 >6 >6 TIME >20% PkT/Bk1t (WKS) T T T
STARTUP 4 SHUTDOWN (YES/NO) 6 MONTHS ON SHIFT 55 CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWINC:
NOTT. I: SEE "INSTkUCTIONS Fok USE OF NUCLEAR POWER PIANT EXPERIENCE FACTORS FOR OPLkATINC SHIFT POSITIONS (OL APPLICANTS)." a. Shift advisors must be used to satisfy the " hot participation INCLUDL All SHIFT SUPERVISORS ($$), SHIFT SR0s, REACTOR experience" requirements of the utility plan. .
NOTE 2: b. Shift advisors will probably be required, at least for some shifts.
OPERATORS (RO) AND SHIF1 TECHNICAL ADVISOR (STA). Do not plan to use shift advisor unless some unforeseen
.c.
circumstance arises.
~
~ 'l i l ! .3 '
- l l~l 6 L I l .
-OPERATING SHIFT EXPERIENCE DATE 10/26/84 JOB TITLE: contr*1 Room Supervisor PLANT WAML Wat erf ord 3-5t.5 UTILITY LP61. (NOTE 2)
. O.L. DATE ,
NUCLEAR POWER PLANT F.XPERIENCE ENTER DATA: MONTHS / MONTHS X WEIGHTINC FACTOR FOR OPERATING SHlfT POSITIONS (NOTE 1)*
WEIGHTING MAXIMUM FACTOR CREDIT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 TiPE OF EXPERIENCE
- 1. SAME TYPE COMMERCIAL SRO l.00 NO LIMIT
- 2. OTHER COtetERCIAL SRO 0.75 NO LIMIT
- 3. SAME TYPE COMMERCIAL R0 1.00 No LIMIT 43/34 52/52 i 4. OTHER COMMERCIAL k0 0.75 M0 LIMIT
- 5. NAVY (MILITART) KUCLEAR 36 MONTHS 0.50 3/I.5 58/29 16/8 (RO EWS. EOOW PPWS) 0.25 18/4.5 48/12 24/12 60/30 48/12 30/7.5 36/9 41/10.3 (OTHER)
- 6. SIMUIATOR 12 MONTHS (REFERENCE PLANT) 5.00 (12 MONTHS) 3.00 6.8 6 6 6.9 6.9 6 6 6 (SIMllAR) (9 MONTHS)
- 7. NUCLEAR FIANT EXPERIENCE ON SHIFT (OWN PLANT) 24 MONTHS 0.75 (12 MONTHS) 18.9 16/8 13/6.5 52/12 58/12 33/12 20/10 27/12 (1.ESS THAN I ) YRS PRIOR TO F.L.) 12/9 12/9 0.50 (12 % NTHS) 9.5/7.5 12/9 12/9 12/9 12/9 12/9 (MohE THAN I i YRS PRIOR 70 F.L.)
0.50 9 MONTHS 4.3 4.3 4 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.5
- 8. LICENSED CLASSROO** TRAINING AND EXAM (OWN PLANT) 0.75 89/12 87/12 12/9 1.9 f.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 '
- 9. PARTICIPATION AT OPERATING PLANT 12MOfTHS 10'. OTHER NUCLEAR. PLANT EXPERIENCE 0.25 12MohMS
- 11. CONDUCTING LICENSE TRAINING 0.25 9 MONTHS
- 12. DEGFFF. (ENGINEERINC APPLIED SCIENCE Ok lyclVALENT) 12 MON 1HS (BACHELORS DECREE) (12 MONTHS)
(6 MONTHS) 12 (ASSOCIATES DECREE) 8.2 8.6 4.9 5.4 3.9 3.4 5.8 4.3 TOTAL NUCLEAR PLANT EXPERIENCE: YEARS . - .
HOT PARTICIPATION EXPER1FNCE
>6 >6 >6 >6 >6 >6 >6 >6 TIME > 02 PWR/BWR (WrS)
STARTUP & SHUTDOWN (YES/NO) Y T MONTHS Oh SHIFT 43 52 NOTE 1: SEE " INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE OF NUCLEAR POWER PLAN 1 EXPERIENCE CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:
FACTMS FOk OPLRATING SHIFT POSITIONS (OL APPLICANTS)."
- a. Shift advisors must be used to satiety the " hot participation NOTE 2: INCLUDE ALL SHIFT SUPERVISORS (55). SHIFT $90s. REACIOR experience" requitements of the utility plan.
OPERATORS (RO) AND SHIFT TECHNICAL ADVISOR (STA).
- b. Shif t advisors will probably be required, at least for some shifts.
- c. Do not plan to,use shift advisor unless some unforeseen circumstance arises.
~! ' *
. ] I. J ~l . Il t .g ] ; j ,[ 3* p7 p] f- - ; ; q -~
L
- OPERATINC $NIPT EXPERIENCE
.i DATE 10/26/84 PLANT NAME Waterford 3-SES
' JOB TITLE: Shift SRO UTILITY LP&L (NOTE 2) 0.L. DATE ' N, I
NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EXPERIENCE INTER DATA: MOW 11tS/NOWTRS E WEIGNTINC PACTOR FOR OPERATIIIC $NIPT POSITIONS (N0ft 1)
WEICRTINJ MA11MLRt CRFBIT 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TTPE OF EXPERIENCE PACTOR I i 1. SAME TTPE COMMERCIAL SRO 1.00 ,No LIMIT
- 2. OTHER ColetERCIAL SRO 0.75 No LIMIT
- 3. SAME TYPF CapetERCIAL RO 1.00 NO LIMIT j
4 OTHER C0!9tERCIAL 80 0.75 NO LIMIT
' 5. NAVY (MILITART) NUCLEAR 36 leNrfMS 25/
(R0. EWS, E00W. PPWS) 0.50 12'.5 51/12.8 (OTHER) 0.25 72/18
- 6. SIMULATOR 12 MONTHS (REFEPENCE PLANT) 5.00 (12 MONTHS) 3.00 (9 MONTHS) 6 6 6 (SIMILAR) 24 MONTHS 22/11 20/10
- 7. NUCLEAR PLANT EXPERIENCE ON SHIFT (OWN.PUUIT) 9.5/
(LESS THAN 1 i TRS PRIOR TO F.L.) 0.75 (12 MONTHS) 31/12- 9.5/
0.50 (12 MONTHS) 12/9 7.2 7.1
! (MORE THAN 1 i YRS PRIOR TO F.L.) ,
- 8. LICENSED CLASSPOOM TRAINING 0.50 9 HONTNS 4.,5 4.7 4.7 AND EKAM (OWN PLANT) 4
- 9. PARTICIPATION AT OPERATING PLANT 0.75 12 % s 1.9 1.9 I.9
- 10. 0111ER NUCLEAR PLANT EXPERIENCE 0.25 12 MONTNS j 11. CONDL'CTING LICENSE TRATNING 0.25 9 MONTHS
- 12. DECREE (ENCINEERING. APPL.IED SCIENCF. OR EQUIVALENT) 12 MONTNS (BACHELORS DECREE) (12 MONTHS)
(6 MONTHS),
(ASSOCIATES DECREE) I 3.8 4.1 3.5 TOTAL NUCLEAR PLANT EXPERIENCE: TEARS HOT PARTICIPATION EIPrefF_ Q i >6 d TIME >20L IWR/BWR (VKS) >6 >6 Y T STARTUP & SHUTDOWN (TF.5/NO)
- MONT11S ON SHIFT l CHECK ONE OF THE POLLOWINC:
NOIE 1: SEE " INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EXPERIENCE l
J TACTORS FOR OPERATING SHIFT POSITIONS (OL APPLICANTS)" O s. Shift advisors must be used to emessfy the " hot Participation
- esperience" requirements of the utility FIan.
NOTE 2: INCLUDE ALL SHIFT SUPERY150RS (SS). SHIFT SRoo. REACTOR O b. Shift advisors will probably be required, et least for some shiftn.
OPERATORS (RO) AND SHIFT TECHNICAL ADVISOR (STA).
O c. Do not P lan to use shif t advisor unless some unforeseen circumstance arises.
~ ' " - "
( .; j j (~ [ ] !
- N7 ~ ~
I~
~'
OPERATING SHIFT EXPERIENCE DATE I?/26/84 St-ff SRO JOB TITLE:
PLANT NAME Waterford 3-505 LP&L (NOTE 2)
UTILITY e 0.L. DATE .
-g NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EXPERIENCE ElfTER DATA MONTHS / MONTHS X WE1CHTING TACTOR it)R OPERATING SHIFT POSITIONS (NOTE 1)
VEICHTING MAXIMUM 10 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 FACTOR CREDIT TYPE OF EXPERIE!3CE 1.00 NO LIMIT 13 36 70 112
- 1. SAME TYPE COMMTPCIAL SRO
- 2. .OTHER COMMERCIAL SRO 0.75 'NO LIMIT I.00 NO LIMIT 24 18 11
- 3. SAME TYPE COMMERCIAL RO
- 4. OT1iER COMMERCIAL R0 0.75 NO LIMIT
- 5. NAVY (MII.17ARY) NUC1.FAR 36 N0kTHS (kO. EWS. E00W. PPWS) 0.50 0.25 60/15 18/4.5 39/10 (OTitLR) 12 NONIllS
- 6. SIMULATOR (RETERENCE PLANT) 5.00 (12 MONTHS) 3.00 (9 MONTHS) ~9 9 7.5 4.5 (SIMilAR) 24 MONTHS 4/3 4/3 4/3 4/3
- 7. NUCLEAR PLANT EXPERIENCE ON SilIFT (OWN PLANT) '
(LESS THAN 1 1 TRS PRIOR TO F.L.) ~ 0.75 (12 MONTHS)
(NORE THAN 1 I YRS PRIOR 10 F.L.) 0.50 (12 MONTHS) ,
- 8. LICENSED CLASSROOM TRAIKING 0.50 9 MONTHS 4/2 472 4/2 4/2 AND EXAM'(OWN PLANT)
- 9. PAETICIPATION AT OPERATINC PLANT 0.75 12MONIlly 24/12 6/4.5 12/9 16/12 0.25 12MONT1b 48/12 48/12 15/3.8
- 10. 0111ER NUCLEAP PLANT EXPERIEECE 0.25 9 MONIMS 36/9
- 11. CONDUCTING LICENSE TRAINING
- 12. DFt3EE (FNCINEERING. APPLIED SCIENCF Ok EQUIVALENT) 17 MohTNS (BACHELOPS DECREE) (12 MONTHS)
(6 MONTHS) 17 12 I.2 (ASSOCIATES DFCREE) 9.3 8.I 8'.4 13.0 TOTAL NUCLEAR PLANT EXPERIENCE: TEARS __
NOT PARTICIPATION EXPERIENCE TIME > 20*/. PWR/BWR (WKS) >6 >6 >6 >6 Y Y Y Y STARTUP & SHUTDOWN (YES/N0) 123 37 54 70 MONTHS ON FHIFT SD. "II;STRUCT10NS FOR USE OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EKPERIENCE CHECK ONE OF THL FOLLOWING:
NOTE 1:
l FACTORS FOR OPERATING SHIFT POSITIONS (OL APPLICANTS)"
O a. Shift advisors must be used to estisfy the " hot participation l
INCLUDE ALL Sil1FT SlfPERVISORS (SS), SHIFT SRos, REACTOR experience" requirements of the utility plan.
[ NOTE 2: O b. Shif t advisors v111 Probably be required, at least for some shif ts.
OPERATORS (RO) AND SRIFT TECHNICAL ADVISOR (STA).
O c. Do not plan to use shif t advisor unless some unforeseen circumstance' arises.
i
SHIFT HOT PARTICIPATION EXPERIENCE FOUR (4) 0F SIX (6) SHIFTS CURRENTLY MEET HOT PARTICIPATION EXPERIENCE. SHIFT EXPERIENCED PERSONNEL, WHO ARE PREVIOUSLY SR0 LICENSED LP&L EMPLOYEES, WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE OTHER i
SHIFTS UNTIL NO LONGER NEEDED.
6%
r6
,i_
L ;
! s e
t
t t
GA E
% lI, /
! #cu i'
t *
,e '(
l> 1 i !' ,
\
< .~'
r ,
(
f* -
I e ,
(
StilFT MAKEUP / DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
/
I a !
]
l~ l
~~~ _
j s' t - ,
- L. y
)
-. . x
?
l ,
i
\.
\
eS i == ')
Ti x ' f.g
- . t /,
e \
- u. - . n u l
- -g-, -_ _
SHIFT MAKEUP l
t +- .
SHIFT SUPERVISOR
' ~
(SRO) ,
7_.
EXPERIENCED PERSON ----
SHIFT-TECHNICAL (SRO)
ADVISOR
) 3
,? C O N T R O L R O'O M SUPERVISOR (SRO) "-'1
- l. '
s NUCLEAR PLANT
~
OPERATOR (RO) 2
!i I
NUCLEAR AUXILIARY OPERATOR 4
WILL BE ASSIGNED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE OPERATING EXPERIENCE
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES SHIFT SUPERVISOR e RESPONSIBLEFORSAFEAND.EFFICIENTOPERATIONOFTijE "r
PLANT ,- ,
e SUPERVISE AND DIRECT ALL OPERATIONS PERSONNEL e SERVE AS EMERGENCY 400RDINATOR UNTIL RELIEVED
[ CONTROL ROOM SUPERVISOR I
e SUPERVISE ALL CONTROL ROOM ACTIVITIES e NOTIFY SHIFT SUPERVISOR OF SIGNIF.ICANT CHANGES IN
^ '
PLANT STATUS s ASSUME THE SHIFT SUPERVISOR: DUTIES IF THE SHIFT
~
SUPERVISOR BECOMES INCAPACITATED SHIFTTECHNICkLADVISOR-
$. e ADVISE THE SHIFT ~ SUPERVISOR DURING TRANSIENTS, ACCIDENTS, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO OPERATIONAL
~
SAFETY ,
b SHIFT EXPERIENCED PERSON p ,
o PROVIDE ADVISORY SUPPORT-T0 THE OPERATING SHIFT CREW L t e REVIEW AND ASSESS THE IMPACT OF ACTIVITIES SCHEDULED N OR IN PROGRESS.
~
e ASSIST IN THE REVIEW 0F P0TENTIAL OR ACTUAL PLANT-r PROBLEMS !J NUCLEAR PLANT OPERATOR e PERFORM CONTROL MANIPULATIONS REQUIRED DURING PLANT
' OPERATION, e MAINTAIN UNIT PARAMETERS WITH LCOs e MONITOR PARAMETERS ASSOCIATED WITH PLANT OPERATIONS NUCLEAR AUXILIARY OPERATOR e TOUR ASSIGNED PLANT AREAS, MONITORING EQUIPMENT FOR
. PROPER OPERATION e PERFORM LOCAL Ih2 PLANT MANIPULATIONS e MEMBER OF EMERGENCY FIRE TEAM
i w l.
e
~
I
- ' i..
'c t
[ PLANT ACTIVITY STATUS se-n
't .
-~ ~ ,
I i
N
[-
L.
b
~
2
, a3 ue4
i l
PLANT ACTIVITY STATUS !
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES
. e T0TAL ,- 30C ASSIGNED 297 APPROVED j 298 WALKED THROUGH 219 COMPLETED e REQUIRED FOR MODE 5 -
13 ASSIGNED 13 APPROVED l~ I? WALKED THROUCM
' 6 COMPLETED r e REQUIRED FOR MODE 6 -
138 ASSIGNED I- 135 APPROVED r 136 WALKED THROUGH I. 126 COMPLETED y SYSTEM TRANSFER TO PLANT STAFF e SYSTEMS REQUIRED FOR POWER ESCALATION -
116 e SYSTEMS REQUIRED FOR POWER ESCALATION
'~
i ACCEPTED TO DATE -
115 e TOTAL SYSTEMS ACCEPTED TO DATE -
If49
~
y AREA TRANSFER TO PLANT STAFF L e ALL TWENTY-NINE (29) AREAS REQUIRED FOR FUEL LOAD HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED BY PLANT STAFF l -
TOTAL AREAS- -
50 l' -
TOTAL AREAS ACCEPTED TO DATE -
50 PRE 0PERATIONAL TESTING e ALL PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED DURING PRE 0PERATIONS l WERE RESOLVED OR ARE AWAITING RETEST DURING POST-CORE HFT l
PLANT ACTIVITY STATUS (CONTINUED)
EXPERIENCE OF OTHER OPERATING PLANTS e NUMEROUS CONTACTS WITH OPERATING PLANTS
- TESTPROGRAM,MAINT5NANCEISSUES, SECURITY,
~'
~ TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, CHEMISTRY ISSUES
- PLANTS CONTACTED - SONGS, ST LUCIE, ANO,FARLEY, NORTH ANNA, SUSQUEHANNA AND OTHERS ,
e DISCUSSION OF PROBLEMS AT SONGS AND ST. LUCIE BY NRC PROJECT MANAGERS AT OPERATIONAL READINESS VISIT BY NRC
~
MANAGEMENT A
e g
g ..
L
. sg ! ' , i
' Np
-r--- - r
e
- s. .
~
EMERGENCY PLANNING em8 mm
'M 4
m en L
.. ~ .
Y
}
, i N
6 f
f
=
. % sen
- C
/J7,., o,f m
EMERGENCY PLANNING e AN EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FOLLOW-UP APPRAISAL WAS
. CONDUCTED JANUARY 30,.1984 - FEBRUARY 10, 1984 e ASLB HEARING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET l
e PUBLIC INFORMATION BROCHURE HAS BEEN DISTRIBUTED -
i e EMERGENCY EXERCISE CONDUCTED ON FEBRUARY 8, 1984,
_ RESULTED IN FAVORABLE NRC REPORT AND FAVORABLE FEMA
_. CRITIQUE .
e FAVORABLE FEMA RESPONSE IS EXPECTED ON THE STATE AND
'~
LOCAL PLANS e LOCAL PARISHES HAVE DEMONSTRATED THEIR ABILITY TO COPE L WITH REAL EMERGENCIES m_ v e THE PROJECT IS GENERALLY WELL ACCEPTED BY THE LOCAL
. I PUBLIC e ALERT / NOTIFICATION SYSTEM IS INSTALLED AND TESTED f'L.
[
$ wr:
m
o DESIGN COMPARISON CONCLUSIONS WATERFORD 3 NSSS CHARACTERISTICS
' l' IDENTICAL TO
$ SAN ON0FRE UNITS 2 & 3
~
NO SUBSTANTIVE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WATERFORD 3 f
i \
AND C-E OPERATING PLANTS 6
e ps5==
p llM
.,,i a= 3
i l
6 f
i
- l
. m
'W l'
L GENERAL LICENSING STATUS e
. . - ~ _
d
}
. x f
l .
i 1 .
i 2 .
1 N 1.
u
'i 1 -. '!! M i
l
, GENERAL LICENSING i
e SER OPEN/ CONFIRMATORY ITEMS LRaL ACTION COMPLETE QN ALL MAJOR NRR ITEMS TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO FUEL LOAD
, e BULLETINS, CIRCULARS, NOTICES AND GENERIC LETTERS 1.
ALL REQUIRED ACTIONS PRIOR TO FUEL LOAD ARE COMPLETE
~
e SCD STATUS ,
ALL SCDs WHICH REQUIRE CLOSURE PRIOR TO FUEL LOAD HAVE l BEEN COMPLETED BY LPal 1.
3 e INSPECTION REPORTS i
OPEN ITEMS THAT REQUIRE CLOS 11RE PRIOR TO FUEL LOAD HAVE BEEN COMPLETED BY LPal 7
e TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH FSAR/SER/AS-BUILT PLANT l - CE, EBASCO REVIEW FSAR CONSISTENCY REVIEW j ,
OPERATIONS REVIEW i -
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SURVEILLANCES l
- . , . _ . . - .,. .- - - , ,.p.
1 i
I
~
l 0
0
- e t
i
_ ANTICIPATED LICENSE CONDITIONS O
(- e e
f b
. i N 8
1
~
p -
\
l t 4 b"sjl .fI b
\'
s
I ANTICIPATED LICENSE CONDITIONS l
I e MAXIMUM POWER LEVEL e TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN e ANTITRUST CONDITIONS e BROAD RANGE T0XIC GAS DETECTOR
- e INITIAL INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM e ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
~
e AXIAL FUEL GROWTH e EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS e FIRE PROTECTION .
_ e INITIALsTEST PROGRAM
[ e EMERGENCY RESPONSE CAPABILITIES
~
e RCS DEPRESSURIZATION CAPABILITY e RESPONSE TO SALEM ATWS EVENT e SPENT FUEL STORAGE RACKS e QUALIFICATION OF PERSONNEL s C0ATINGS INSIDE CONTAINMENT b
4 i
j I
COMMON BASEMAT CRACKS t
- - A .
e W
I-N 9
I
- " ~
,,s.T t
.k %\.
s;[.f.
-- --- r .:t
_-3.-
COMMON BASEMAT CRACKS i
! e JOINT INTERVENORS FILED MOTION TO RE0 PEN LICENSING HEARINGS BASED UPON " GAMBIT" NEWSPAPER ARTICLE.
~
e APPEAL BOARD DENIED MOTION - DECEMBER 1983 e JOINT INTERVENORS FILED NEW MOTION BASED ON " GAMBIT" ARTICLE ALLEDGING DEFICIENT AND FORGED QA RECORDS ON BASEMAT.
I e LPal RESPONDED TO APPEAL BOARD - JANUARY 1984 e NRC STAFF RESPONDED IN SEVERAL FILINGS WITH
= RECOMMENDATION TO DENY MOTION IN LAST FILING - AUGUST 1984 e APPEAL BOARD REQUESTED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF
- DUE DECEMBER 17, 1984 e LPal ENGAGED INDEPENDENT CONSULTANTS T0:
I PERFORM INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL
' ADEQUACY
~
PERFORM ULTRASONIC NDT ON BASEMAT TO DETERMINE CRACK
[ LENGTH, DEPTH, WIDTH AND ORIENTATION.
e LP8L SUBMITTED REPORTS ON:
INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS BASEMAT NDT RESULTS EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CRACKS
. DETERMINED BY NDT i e APPEAL BOARD REVIEW IMPACT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF l INTEREST ON RELIANCE ON CONSULTANTS REPORTS e NRC STAFF HAS DETERMINED BASEMAT CRACKS CONSTITUTE N0 HAZARD FOR OPERATION UP TO 5% POWER, e NRC STAFF /LPal HAVE ESTABLISHED BASEMAT MONITORING PROGRAM
9
~
, i
. ~
NRC 23 ISSUES G
W 4.
s
~K
\
- I
. ' x a
t 4 muu 98 j f
'n: 'If :
i RESOLUTION OF 23 ISSUES PRIMARY PARTICIPANTS e LPaL PROJECT, QA AND LICENSING PERSONNEL
. . - e EBASCO
~
e SlJBCONTRACTORS e SRC SUBCOMMITTEE e TASK FORCE
.- ~
} f a TASK FORCE SUPPORT GROUP kep-
RESOLUTION OF 23 ISSUES PRINCIPLES e LPal LINE MANAGEMENT IN CHARGE e OBJECTIVITY ,
] e CRITICAL REVIEW e ACCURACY OF RESPONSES s CONSERVATISM OF RESdLUTIONS g e PRIORITY OF RESOURCES I x
>6 m
4 f
e i
RESOLUTION OF 23 ISSUES PROCESS e REACH FULL UNDERSTANDING 0F C0NCERN e DATA GATHERING l e CAUSE
_ e GENERIC IMPLICATIONS e DETERMINE MANNER OF RESOLUTION (LOGIC / PROGRAM PLAN) e RESOLUTION OF CONCERN AND GENERIC IMPLICATIONS e DEVELOP RESPONSE e DETERMINE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE IN TERMS OF FUEL LOAD AND
- POWER ASCENSION
. e LP8L RESPONSE REVIEW TEAM REVIEW
~
e SRC SUBCOMMITTEE REVIEW s LP&L VALIDATION e SUBMITTAL e TASK FORCE INDEPENDENT VALIDATION I
e
_ - - - . . -,-__---.,,m , - - .---
l RESOLUTION OF 23 ISSUES SOFTWARE
{- ISSUE SHORT TITLE RESOLUTION 5 CONDITIONAL RELEASES TRACKING AND CLOSURE OF f CONDITIONAL RELEASES 7 BACKFILL COMPILATION OF DATA -
ENGINEERING EVALUATION 8 HYDR 0 0F SHOP WELDS EXPLANATION OF PROCESS -
REVIEW OF DATA 10 JONES a FEGLES INSPECTOR QUALIFICATION
~ INSPECTORS VERIFICATION 11 CADWELDING ' COMPILATION AND e
COMPUTERIZATION OF DATA -
! N ENGINEERING EVALUATION
~
~
13 MISSING NCRs ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEW -
CLOSURE OF IDENTIFIED
~
RECORDS DEFICIENCIES F
lI
! 16 0A/QC INTERVIEWS ENHANCED. INTERVIEW i PROGRAM - EVALUATION OF l- PRIOR INTERVIEWS i
RESOLUTION OF 23 ISSUES -
i i
INSPECTION / EVALUATION ISSUE SHORT TITLE RESOLUTION 4 UPGRADE OF " LOWER SAMPLE. REVIEW 0F LOWER T1ER" DOCUMENTS TIER DOCUMENTS FOR UPGRADE /
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE 9 J.A. JONES WELDERS IDENTIFICATION OF J.A.
JONES WELDING SCOPE -
INSPECTION OF WELDS -
ENGINEERING EVALUATION i ge s 14 J.A. JONES SPEED SAMPLE REVIEWS -
. LETTERS ENGINEERING' EVALUATION 17 EXPANSION ANCHORS REVIEW 0F INSPECTION
. ATTRIBUTES - INSPECTION g 0F N1 INSTRUMENTATION
._ ANCHORS ,
i 18 TWO-0VER-0NE WALKDOWNS FORMALIZATION OF PROCEDURE -
\
SAMPLE WALKDOWNS 20 GE0 TESTING PERSONNEL INSPECTOR QUALIFICATION VERIFICATION - ENGINEERING AND STATISTICAL (ACI)
EVALUATIONS 21 SYSTEM TRANSFER REVIEW 0F PROCESS AND CLOSURE OF CONSTRUCTION QA OPEN ITEMS - LIMITED EVALUATION 22 WELDER QUALIFICATIONS / REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF WELD R0D CONTROL WELDER QUALIFICATIONS /-
PROCEDURE REVIEW, WELD R0D TESTS
RESOLUTION OF 23 ISSUES HARDWARE ISSUE SHORT TITLE RESOLUTION f*
1 INSPECTOR QUALIFICATI0'NS INSPECTOR QUALIFICATION VERIFICATION - REVIEW OF THE WORK 0F " UNQUALIFIED" INSPECTORS - REINSPECTION -
MINOR REWORK 2 CLASS BREAK DISCRETIONARY REWORK OF 16 INSTRUMENT LINES 3 EXPANSION LOOPS INSPECTION - REWORK 0F ONE LOOP - ENGINEERING EVALUATION
- 6 DISPOSITIONING OF NCRs REVIEW 0F NCRs/DRs IDENTIFIED l.'. BY NRC - SAMPLE REVIEW 0F
--REMAINING NCRs/DRs .
s ENGINEERING EVALUATION -
! MINOR REWORK
_ s
!- 12 MAIN STEAM RESTRAINTS INSPECTION - REPLACEMENT OF
'~
APPR0XIMATELY 750 0F OVER 12,000 BOLTS BECAUSE BOLTS.
NOT READILY TRACEABLE 1
15 'D' LEVEL WELDING SAMPLE IN$PECTION OF 'D' LEVEL WELDS - REWORK CONSISTED OF REPAIRING ARC STRIKES l
19 CONDUIT SEEPAGE ENGINEERING EVALUATION -
GROUTING 0F PIEZ0 METER STAND PIPE - CONTINUING OBSERVATION PROGRAM i
i RESOLUTION OF 23 ISSUES COLLECTIVE SIGNIFICANCE
[, FORMAT ,
e
SUMMARY
REVIEW 0F RESOLUTION OF EACH ISSUE e LESSONS LEARNED BY ISSUE VS. OPERATIONAL QA PROGRAM
]
s ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIONAL QA PROGRAM CONCLUSIONS
- g. .
L.
e CONSTRUCTION QA ER0 GRAM HAD SHORTCOMINGS
. . . e PRIMARY DEFICIENCIES WERE IN RECORDS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS l~
e HARDWARE WORK LIMITED - MUCH WAS CONSERVATIVE AND l- DISCRETIONARY f~
L e OVERALL ADE0VACY OF PLANT CONFIRMED
'I 6
l .
. . .__- . ._ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ . _ - . . _ _
RESOLUTION OF 23 ISSUES STATUS e RESPONSES PRECEDENT TO FUEL LOAD SUBMITTED OCTOBER 31, 1984 e FINAL SUPPLEMENTS SUBMITTED DECEMBER 6, 1984 e TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED DECEMBER 7, 1984 he f
e
! x Ph me
(
t e
RESOLUTION OF 23 ISSUES i
I SIGNIFICANT REMAINING WORK l- -
e REVIEW / RESOLUTION OF QA NON-INSPECTOR MID JANUARY 1985 PERSONNEL e REVIEW OPEN SCD SCOPES MID DECEMBER 1984
~
e QT ANALYSIS OF 'LP&L QA/QC INTERVIEWS END DECEMBER 1984 e REACTION TO RECENT TASK FORCE MID DECEMBER 1984 RECOMMENDATIONS'
~~
e SUBMIT FINAL REPORT . MID JANUARY 1985
. e'
.. \
ee
'1 e
RESOLUTION OF 23 ISSUES ESTIMATES OF EFFORT EXPENDED (WORK MONTHS) .
'THRU 10-27-84 THRU 12-7-84 TO G0 LP8L 480 580 10 EBASCO 400 500 5 OTHER LP8L SITE CON' TRACTORS 155 200 10 0FFSITE SUBCONTRACTORS 20 30 0 SUB-T0TAL .1055. .1310. .21
- A 107 120 fUNC/NUSs , 1
_ TOTALS 111 2 .l!!1Q 26 I
_ _ _ a - a 9
f 1
.j - r. _
JOINT INTERVENORS MOTION
_ ON QA AND MANAGEMENT e
o e
.a 9
i ii
_ \
_m.
t
% :ertA--4 e
~
Ji MOTION TO ASLAB TO REOPEN PUBLIC HEARING (NOVEMBER 7,1984) ,
[
. e JI ALLEGATIONS ,
ALLEGED FAILURE OF LPal TO MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE QA PROGRAM ALLEGED LACK 0F CHARACTER AND COMPETENCE OF LPal TO OPERATE WATERFORD 3 ALLEGED INADEQUACY OF NRC STAFF EFFORTS TO ENSURE THAT ALLEGED CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENtIES OF POTENTIAL SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE HAVE BEEN RESOLVED
~
e LPal RESPONSE TO MOTION APPEAL BOARD IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO REOPEN ON NEW ISSUES;
~
i; JI l(AVE FAILED TO SATISFY REQUIREMENTS FOR REOPENINGS
~
~
JI HAVE FAILED TO SATISFY REQUIREMENTS FOR LATE-FILED CONTENTIONS JI HAVE FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY HAVE RAISED ANY SIGNIFICANT SAFETY ISSUES THAT WOULD HAVE CAUSED A DIF-FERENT RESULT IN THE LICENSING BOARD PROCEEDINGS: AND THE MOTION TO REOPEN MUST BE DENIED
I' )
.f a
I I
i f* <
t- .
man.
_ CAT ,
l i
t e
b
\
.. A -
. Y l, i
I. \
4 I
e .
o e
8 i
I 6
t Ih I
=
~ -fp 5Y ,
e= #
, V8 ,
/) !
'1. '
M_1 : iM' i
j
CONSTRUCTION APPRAISAL TEAM INSPECTIONS FEBRUARY 13-24 AND WARCH 12-23,1984 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS hh e " HARDWARE AND DOCUMENTATION FOR PIPING, CONCRETE, INSTRUMENTATION, STRUCTURAL STEEL, WELDING AND NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, AND HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) DUCTING WERE GENERALLY FOUND TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENTS."
- PROGRAM WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIED r
o CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAMS .-
} i -
EXTENSIVE ACTION TAKEN - CLOSED e INSPECTION PROGRAM FOR ELECTRICAL RACEWAY SEPARATION COMPREHENSIVE REINSPECTION PROGRAM - CLOSED 1
., e .a l
CONSTRUCTION APPRAISAL TEAM INSPECTION FOLLOW-UP
SUMMARY
.RESULTS f .
- POTENTIAL ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS e 16 ITEMS. ORIGINALLY CLASSIFIED AS POTENTIAL ENFORCEMENT
'. ACTIONS
~
FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION FINDINGS e 7 ITEMS DETERMINED TO BE NON-ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
~
,. e 6 ITEMS DETERMINED TO BE VIOLATIONS
[.
e 2 ITEMS UNDER REVIEW BY TASK F.QRCE
] i e 1 ITEM UNRESOLVED PENDING NRR EVALUATION CLOSURE STATUS e 12 ITEMS CLOSED e 3 TASK FORCE ITEMS (VERBALLY CLOSED) e 1 ITEM UNRESOLVED PENDING NRR EVALUATION e
_ _m m. _a- _ e..- -..w--
6 e I
l f' . .
+
4-O ame
. PLANT ORGANIZATION
+
+
WB 9
0 r- .
.. A '
r 4 4
he li x -
u 9
+
9
~- -
i A - &.. )
1 4 -
c_
_ '[ m J
'Ei. F I M-i +
l 1
, t, i i .. ! i e ; i .
PLANT ORGANIZATION
- ~" WATEIFORD 3
- PLANT MANAGER-NELEAR I
I I I l I
PLANT A mlN. PLANT PLANT TEOtilCAL PLANT OPERATIONS & QJALITY SERVICES TRAINING . SERVICES mlNTENANCE QJAllTY MANAGER- ADMINISTRATIVE
- TRAINING
- ASSISTANT PLANT
- ASSISTANT PLANT MILEAR 19 NAGER-NJCLEAR l% NAGER-MELEAR MANAGER-NUCLEAR MANAGER-MILEAR I 1 L_ i I
I I l l I
'0PERATIONS MINTENANCE STA SUPERVISOR k M h TEONICALSWPORT p$@
- PLAPHING & OFFICE hlNINGSUPT. TEOWICALS& PORT RAD. PROTECTim
- 0PERATIONS MAINTENANCE *ENGIEERING SOEULING SWV. SWERVISOR ll-M) CLEAR STT.-NXLEAR STT.-MILEAR SUPT.-NUCLEAR SUPT.-NELEAR - SIFV.-NUCLEAR I I I
m CLERICAL TE% pg OOilSTRY RADWASTE OFFICE TRAINING DEPT. ENGlEER- ENGIEER-
. PEOi, ASST. NELEAR SURRVISOR l-M) CLEAR NELEAR SUPT.-MELEAR ,
L
[M y
SECURITY T TRAINING SIFT.
ENG ENGlEER-E EALTH PHYSICS KALTH PHYSICS SECURITY ELECT ASST. NELEAR SifDVISOR (2)
SWERINTENDENT l-MELEAR SUPT.-NUCLEAR ETERIALS SUPPORT IEC MANAGE?ENT ENGIEERING MINTEMNCE MATERIALS ENGIEER-INSTR. & CONTROLS NUCLEAR ASST. SUPI.-NJC. P0MI. SIFT.
I I MTERIALS ETERIALS PERFORMAN&
STAFF t ANALYSIS EDT.
- C0hTROL AMISTORES EElEERING PROClFENNT M TERIALS & ENGIEER-UTILITY MELEAR ENGR.-NUCLEAR COORDINATOR STORES SLIV.
k e
9- e o e
- TRAINING STATUS oh 9
m
-y 9
.. A ,
e P'
1 N e P er m
e I
e l
f -s 1
I
.%Lr
't .
IEn N uw]
xi.
!i I
TRAINING STATUS ALL COLD LICENSE TRAINING COMPLETE e GROUP 1 - LICENSES ISSUED TO 27 0F 29 CANDIDATES e GR0llP 2 - LICENSES / CERTIFICATIONS ISSUED TO 13 0F 14 CANDIDATES (5 R0s AND 5 SR0s FOR OPERATIONS,1 LICENSE AND 2 CERTIFICATIONS FOR TRAINING)
, o GROUP 3 - LICENSES ISSUED TO 5 0F 5 CANDIDATES
. (PREVIOUSLY EXPERIENCED SR0s) e ALL CANDIDATES TESTED ULTIMATELY RECEIVED LICENSE e LICENSE ISSUANCE BREAKDOWN
~ '
THIRTY (30) OPERATIONS (18 SRO - 12 R0)
TWO (2) OPERATIONS MANAGMENT (2 SROT THREE (3) STAFF (3 SRO)
- SIX (6) TRAINING (5 SR0 - 1 INST, CERT. SRO) x ,
~'
ALL INITIAL REQUIRED TRAINING COMPLETE
~
TRAINING EMPHASIS e LP&L SIMULATOR ACQUISITION e PLANNING FOR ACCREDITATION e CLOSING LICENSING AND AUDIT FINDINGS e HOT LICENSE CLA$S IN FR0GRESS l
I e . FIR $T YEAR OF OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION NEARING COMPLETION
a - ._
4
'en
- g. . .
'~, .
e4 N
PLANT SPECIFIC SIMULATOR BeOS O
'M Puhaus
> O4 h
(
}
i \
e e4D e
s 4Y I
d e
(
4 A
!g .oM
't
PLANT SPECIFIC SIMULATOR e A SIMULATOR CONTRACT WAS AWARDED TO THE LINK SIMULATION l SYSTEMS DIVISION OF THE SINGER COMPANY ON FEBRUARY 1, 1980, THE SIMULATOR IS SCHEDULED TO BE COMPLETED AND READY FOR TRAINING BY OCTOBER 31, 1986 THE SIMULATOR WILL BE LOCATED IN THE WATERFORD 3 s
E0F/ TRAINING CENTER ADJACENT TO THE PLANT SITE
. e THE SIMULATOR WILL BE UTILIZED FOR TRAINING STAFF IN
-. - PROGRAMS SUCH AS:
~
OPERATOR TRAINING AND REQUALIFICATION ENGINEERING (STA'S) TRAINING AND REQUALIFICATION DEVELOPMENT AND VERIFICATION OF PLANT PROCEDURES CONDUCT. PLANT BETTERMENT ANALYSIS SUPPORT EMERGENCY DRILLS
' - e SOME TRAINING FEATURE HIGHLIGHTS:
-. e
- I - xBACKTRACK REPLAY / RECORD SLOW / FAST TIME t
FREEZE /SNAPSH0T/ RESET PORTIONS OF THE PLANT MONITORING COMPUTER HARDWARE l WILL BE DUPLICATED, THEREBY ALLOWING COPIES OF THE ACTUAL PLANT SOFTWARE TO BE UTILIZED fI e THE PROJECT IS NOW UNDERWAY WITH A LARGE PERCENTAGE OF PLANT SPECIFIC DATA TRANSFERRED AND HARDWARE PURCHASES i NEARING COMPLETION
l
~
l
- m. .
PM EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY / TRAINING CENTER es F .
L
}
i N
_,g 4
w.e e
l' s.
4%.
IV _A m _u
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY / TRAINING CENTER e LPal REQUESTED AND RECEIVED NRC APPROVAL FOR INTERIM EOF
" OPERATION THROUGH DECEMBER, 1984
~
e THE' LOCATION OF THE NEW BUILDING IS APPR0XIMATELY ONE (1)
MILE SOUTH OF WATERFORD 3 WITH ACCESS FROM A PRIVATE ROAD FROM THE PLANT AND FROM LOUISIANA HIGHWAY 3127
~
e THE E0F DESIGN INCORPORATES ADE00 ATE SHIELDING AND HVAC SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS, IN ADDITION, EMERGENCY GENERATION WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE BUILDING
_. e THIS FACILITY WILL ALSO HOUSE THE PLANT SPECIFIC SIMULATOR AND OUR VISITORS CENTER
'e 'THE EOF PORTION OF.THIS FACILITY IS PRESENTLY SCHEDULED
~
FOR OWNER BENEFICIAL OCCUPANCY BY DECEMBER 21,.1984,
~
THE BALANCE OF THE BUILDING IS' SCHEDULED FOR COMPLETION
- BY JANUARY 11, 1985 7
x
_. e THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT HAS BEEN AWARDED AND l_ CONSTRUCTION COMMENCED IN EARLY MAY i .
f l -
l l
.