ML20148H022

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:39, 23 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 871124 Meeting W/Util at Region IV Re Procurement Program,Readiness of Fire Protection Sys for Restart & Current Concerns.Notice of Significant Licensee Meeting & Viewgraphs Encl
ML20148H022
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 12/03/1987
From: Miller L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
Shared Package
ML19341D829 List:
References
NUDOCS 8801270095
Download: ML20148H022 (42)


Text

, YbaW s ,h* o UMTED STATES

! n NUCLEAR RESULATORY COMMISSION I REGION V 1450 MARIA LANE, SUITE 210

, 4

,e WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNI A 94596 December 3, 1987 MEMORANDUM FOR: DN 50-312 FROM: L. Miller, Chief Reactor ProjectsSection II SUBJFCT: MINUTES FOR THE NOVEMBER 24, 1987 MEETING ON RANCHO

. SECO BETWEEN NRC AND SMUD REPRESENTATIVES TO DISCUSS PROCUREMENT, FIRE PROTECTION, AND CURRENT CONCERNS The following is a sumary of an infonnational meeting held on November 24, h - 1987 at the Region V office with representatives of the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD). The purpose of the meeting was to discuss SMUD's perception of their procurement program, the readiness of fire protection systems for restart, and current concerns. (An Agenda, Notice of Significant Meeting, and SMUD's presentation viewgraphs are enclosed.)

SMUD made a detailed presentation and regional representatives provided coment and questions. The following points were emphasized by SMUD representatives:

Bolting:

1. SMUD detennined that 64 bolts of the same type as those found by the NRC to be understrength were in the warehouse as spares. These bolts were A193 B7 Quality Class II bolts, with Clark Brothers bolt head markings, procured from Westinghouse in two lots. SMUD did not know how many bolts of this manufacture were installed in the plant. However, SMUD intended to complete an engineering study by December 15 to demonstrate that all non-safety related bolts actually installed in the plant were adequate for their intended service.
2. SMUD conducted a check for comingling of bolting material in the warehouse, but had "received no reports" of commingiing. This check was not documented, nor was it conducted in accordance with a written plan. SMUD also was unfamiliar with the inspector's detailed findings, and requested to be i

made aware of these. (Subsequent to the meeting, J. Dyer indicate.1 that of SMUD had been present when the ASTRP team was given the bolting material which the team had identified as potentially comingled. The detailed description of this material will be in Inspection Report 87-29.) ,

SMUD also stated that by November 30, 1987, all Quality Class 1 bolting material in the warehouse would be maintained physically segregated from other material (as opposed to maintaining different quality classes in the same drawer separated by dividers, the current SMUD practice).

l l 9801270095 880111

ADDCK 050 2 gDR l

4 4

4 o ,

3. SMUD conducted a 100% inventory of its warehouse stock, to identify all deficiencies in material identification and storage. of SMUD stated that the records of these deficiencies were available for review.

Materials Management: t

1. SMUD reported that an assessment of materials management practices had .

been conducted which concluded that past practices had not contributed to any degradation conclusion wasof safetyatrelated provided systems. ()No insight into the basis for this the meeting.

. Fire Protection:

1. SMUD indicated that the number of fire barrier breaches was significantly reduced, and very few breached barriers were expected by the scheduled restart date.
2. SMUD agreed to complete its evaluation of containment fire hose capacity by the end of December, and to submit this evaluation to NRR.

~

3. SMUD agreed to rcview the seismic design basis of the reactor coolant '

pump oil collection tank in view of the recent inspection finding that the tank itself was seismic category II rather than category I (as indicated in the SMUD SER submittal).

Other Topics:

1. SMUD agreed to perform a trainwise loss of offsite power test initiated

.I with a simultaneous loss of offsite power and safety injection initiation signal, including sequencing of safety loads onto the affected busses. .

2. SMUD also agreed to review the test envelope to ensure that the design j basis loading scheme was evaluated by this test.
3. SMUD indicated that their long term goal was to reduce the corrective '

maintenance backlog to one or two months of effort. (This appeared to be a change from the previous commitment to reduce the backlog to "as low as reasonably possible.")

i The Regional Administrator made several points, in addition to the NRC concerns noted parentMtically above:

i j 1. The SMUD review of the loss of offsite power test appeared cursory, in

view of the substantive NRC coments, and the failure by SMUD to have j considered these concerns prior to the NRC raising them. +

! 2. The delay by SMUD in establishing the loss of offsite power procedure in

final form suggested that preparations and training by personnel on the final procedure might be lacking due to its unavailability until the test was to be

! performed. "

r

3. The unavailability of acceptance criteria for the diesel generator vibration problem which has been identified suggested that SMUD was not participating actively enough in the resolution of this problem, but may have lapsed into allowing a contractor to have too much responsibility for the problem's definition and resolution.
4. The apparent change in SMUD's comitment to vigorously reduce the '

corrective maintenance backlog as low as possible prior to restart was disturbing. SMUD was requested to clearly define what level of corrective maintenance requests they were prepared to accept for restart to clarify this ambiguity.

5. The findings and recomendations of the B&W Owner's Group SPIP program and the SMUD EASTRP program should be completely reviewed by SMUD to ensure that all restart items have been identified and accomplished prior to restart.

The meeting was concluded with a sumary by Mr. Martin. He stressed the importance of SMUD developing an operating perspective as opposed to the h

construction perspective which had prevailed through most of the outage to the present. It was noted that SMUD had not yet demonstrated this orientation towards operations. Mr. Ferlit of SMUD agreed with these remarks, and reaffirmed SMUD's comitment to a high quality, safe restart of Rancho Seco.

C.yf -  !

. liller, Chief Reactor Project ection 11 cc: Region V Rancho Seco Staff G. Holahan, NRR G. Knighton, NRR G. Kalman, NRR J. Partlow, NRR J. Stone, NRR

... na as y

\ y'o LNHTED STATES g

8 o NUCLEAR REGULATERY COMMISSION 3

  • , c

) REGION V 1450 MARI A LANE, SUITE 210 f WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA M5M

%,*****,o November 23, 1987 NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT MEETING Hame of Licensee: Sacramento Municipal Utility District Name of Facility: Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station Docket No.: 50-312 Date and Time 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 24, 1987 of Meeting:

t -

Location Region V Office, Walnut Creek, California of Meeting:

Purpose of Meeting To discuss bolting quality, connercial dedication practices, and other procurement issues; fire protection systems availability and miscellaneous topics at Region V's request. This meeting will be a presentation by SMUD of the results of their recent audits and investigations of these topics.

NRC Attendees: J. B. Martin, D. F. Kirsch, and other Region Y personnel Licensee Attendees: G. Andognini, J. Firlit, and supporting SMUD personnel NOTE:

Attendance at this meeting by NRC personnel other than those listed above should be made known by Monday, November 22, 12:00 noon via a telephone call to L. Miller, FTS 463-3869.

Distribution:

NRC Attendees Listed Above Licensee Attendees J. M. Taylor, EDO J. Partlow NRR T. Murley, NRR G. Holahan,NRR J. Stone, NRR

e. , , .a' f -

, AGENDA MEETING BETWEEN REPRESENTATIVE OF SMUD AND NRC REGION Y

1. Opening R9. marks by Regional Administrator and Chief Executive Officer, Nuclear
2. Presentations by SMUD and Discussion with Region V

. A. Procurement Control of Bolting Material -

Commercial Dedication Practices at SMUD B. Readiness c,f Fire Protection Systems for Restart C. Discussion of Current Concerns Late Completion of PASS Operability of Essential HVAC Justification of Emergency Operating Procedure Deviations Timely Notice of Key Test Procedures and Mode Escalation Major Changes to Restart Scope List /Long Range Scope List Timely Inspection Open Item Resolution

3. Concluding Remarks i

l l

)

1 5

SMUD/NRC M EETl N G

.?,d,ik ,

la.. f,T; 'JN'_r '

~ ~ ;u: .

J' M ATERI ALS 2

lj  !._ ] MANAGEMENT

- bhj -

3 ,, ., ,, ,,p . . ..

[l$g7*pgg 71 nd' 7_ ~: 5?5 j

.h 9 L w $5-

-s";

.r -nsg im gy;g-smWp:

{ , t, "anggqi

.. :.:.: g;; NOVEMBER 24, 1987 u

1 l

. r, ,

i I

i

. i i

i AGENDA i

o INTRODUCTION o A193 87 BOLTING ISSUES o ASSESSMENT OF PAST PRACTICES o

MATERIALS MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN o

SUMMARY

e a m &

. ~ '

BOLTING O CLARK BROTHERS BOLTS '

- How Acquired Use

- NRC Samples -

- Location of Bolts , -

- Corrective Actions o GENERIC BOLT PROCUREMENT o STORAGE o ISSUE CONTROL -

o IMPACT OF BOLT ISSUE ON OPERABILITY -

o BU LLETIN 87-02 r4 4

f ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT OF BOP BOLTS o

PLANT HAS BEEN OPERATING FOR 10 YEARS WITH NO HISTORY OF INSERVICE BOLT FAILURES o NO FAILURES DURING HYDRO TESTS o

PRESSURE BOUNDARY APPLICATIONS USE MULTIPLE BOLTING. IN CASE OF FAILURE OF ONE BOLT, LEAKAGE l WILL BE DETECTED BEFORE THE UNLIKELY FAILURE i

I OF ALL BOLTS.

o TYPICALLY, PRELOAD STRESS IS HIGHER THAN WORKING STRESS -

o SERVICE LOADINGS DO NOT LOAD TO THE LIMIT. BOLTS ARE TORQUED BASED ON A PRELOAD STRESS OF 30,000 PSI WHICH IS 75% OF THE YlELD STRENGTH OF THE CB-87 BOLTS AS TESTED BY THE NRC.

d

. r. .

PAST PRACTICE ASSESSMENT MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PRACTICES o DISTRICT'S PROGRAMS WERE REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS o DISTRICT'S PROGRAMS WERE CONTINUALY UPGRADED TO REMAIN IN COMPLIANCE o QA WAS INVOLVED AT ALL LEVELS OF THE PROCESS AS AN INLINE FUNCTION AS WELL AS

~

AN OVERVIEW / AUDIT o DISTRICT'S QUALITY AUDIT PROGRAM HAS PERFORMED REGULAR COMPLIANCE EVALUATIONS o OUTSIDE AGENCIES HAVE PERFORMED NUMER US AUDITS OF DISTRICT PRACTICES

,+. .

t 1 .

PAST PRACTICE ASSESSMENT l

CONCLUSION SUFFICIENT CONTROLS HAVE BEEN IN PLACE SINCE INITIAL .

OPERATION TO REASONABLY ASSURE THAT PROPER MATERIALS i

HAVE BEEN USED IN SAFETY RELATED SYSTEMS -

d

. a. . . . .

ACTION PLAN -

BACKGROUND WHILE NOT SPECIFICALLY TIED TO A MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PROBLEM, LER 85-14 COMMITFED THE DISTRICT TO (IN PART):

o ESTABLISH A FORMAL MATERIALS PROGRAM THAT ADDRESSES ALL CLASSES AND - ANY SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS o REVIEW ADEQUACY OF ALL EXISTING STOCK CARDS o INSPECT ALL EXISTING CLASS 1 WAREHOUSE STOCK

f i

i CURRENT WAREHOUSE ASSESSMENT WAREHOUSE INSPECTION o 100 % "WALL-TO- WALL" INVENTORY o MATERIAL CATEGORIZED INTO WORK ACTIVITIES o REVERIFICATION TO CURRENT STANDARDS IS ONGOING .

r

~

l

. . - . ' ,W, o

PERMANENT MATERIAL CONTROL DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION I

MANAGER MA1F_ RIAL CONTROL 1 SMUD Monoger SENIOR SECRETARY (CONFIDENTIAL) 1 SMUD Senior Conffdentfel Sooretary I I I I SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR PROCUREMENT NUCLEAR PLANT STOREKEEPER MATERIAL INVENTORY WAREHOUSING ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT COORDINATION MANAGEMENT Ac RECEIVINO o OEVELDP TECHNCA1.

  • PURCHASING e WORK Pt.ANNINO e CODeNO AND MATERIAL SPEC 8PICAT10N e TRANSPORTATION e RECDPT OF ORO. INTDtFACE3 CATALDOtNG MATUtIAL e DEFINE QUAIAY COORDINATION e INTERNAL e NMIS DLE RFris BIREMENT
  • EXPEDITING e STORADE EXPEDITING MAINTENANCE
  • ISSUF,/DElJVE7W e EQUfVALENCY e DESCREPANCY
  • CYCtJC INVENTOfW e IN-STORADE EVA11AAT)ON ItE30umON
  • PROCEDURAL DEVEL MAINTENANCE o SUEB3TITUTA51UTY e PURCHASE ORDER & MAJNTENANCE e RESOL MCE ANALy3:3 ADMINISTRATION
  • MATEFt1AL RECOVUtY e m yg prrript e N INTERFACE REVUtsnCAT10N m o INVENTORY PROBLEMS CONTMOL o SPECIFY ACCEPTANCE CRITERRA 1 SMUD Senior 1 SMUD Supervisor 1 3 MUD Supervfoor 1 SWUO Supervisor 1 SuuD Storekeeper En91 neer 3 SMUD Buyers 2 SMUD Coordinotare 3 SWUD Speosastete 2 SMUD Senior Motoriol 2 SuuD Engineers 1 SMUD Utfuty 3 SuuD Operatore Hondiere i

1 Q.C. Engineer TYPl ot Clerk 3 SMUD Coding /Cloself 15 SuuD Material Hondiere 1 SWUD Utlpty Typist Clerk

  • s. ,%

i 4

ACTION PLAN PLANT PROCUREMENT o

PROVIDE ON-SITE PROCUREMENT (COMPLETE) o CHANGE PURCHASE ORDER FORMAT (COMPLETE) o NUCLEAR QUALITY INVOLVEMENT IN PURCHASING (COMPLETE) o IMPLEMENT COMPUTER PRODUCTION OF PURCHASE ORDERS (~12/87) o INCLUDE WEST COAST SUPPLIERS ON APPROVED SUPPLIERS LIST (~3/88)

O e

. . ,s. -

i .

4 1

ACTION PLAN i

t INVENTORY CONTROL o

ACQUIRE NUCLEIS SOFTWARE (COMPLETE) .

o COMPLETE NUCLEIS DATA EXPANSION (~6/88)

. o COMPLETE MMS RECONFIGU RATION (~6/88) o SPARE PARTS REVIEW OF CRITICAL SYSTEMS

(~6/88) .

} -

. e

, e O ,

ACTION PLAN '

WAR EHOU SING o SEPARATE CLASS 1 BOLTING (~11/87) o RELOCATE SURPLUS MATERIAL TO RESOURCE RECOVERY (~1/88) o SEPARATE OTHER CLASS 1 MATERIAL (~3/88) o .

ESTABLISH STAGING CAPABILITY (~6/88)-

o FINALIZE NEW WAREHOUSE DESIGN (~3/88) f

,,p., -

4 I

i j

f f

I i

ACTION PLAN i

! MATERIAL COORDINATION ~

o ESTABLISH ORGANIZATION (COMPLETE) o IMPLEMENT AUTO TRANSFER OF MATERIAL i

STATUS TO PLANNING AND SCHEDULING

(~6/88) 4 i

' ~

, , ,+,4 ACTION PLAN PROCUREMENT ENGINEERING t

o INTEGRATE FUNCTIONS INTO SINGLE ORGANIZATION (COMPLETE) ~

o ESTABLISH PROCESS FOR COMMERCIAL GRADE EVALUATION / DOCUMENTATION (COMPLETE) o ESTABLISH REVERIFICATION PROCESSES (COMPLETE)

I 4

, o., - --

s l

SUMMARY

4 o ASSESSMENTS OF PAST PRACTICES GIVE REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT PROPER MATERIALS HAVE BEEN USED ~

IN SAFETY RELATED SYSTEMS o ACTION PLAN FOR ENHANCEMENTS TO MATERIALS MANAGEMENT AND CLOSURE OF LER 85-14 COMMITMENTS ESTABLISHED i

o ORGANIZATION AND SINGLE POINT ACCOUNTABILITIES ESTABLISH ED j

r..

4

[ l l ___ h :%5i g;..jli -

VT

.;z si f: 7. .

i ; I: v,-

.b

, ..- If

" e7i ., l _ z i

m;rj'g,; '- SMUD/NRC M EETlN G l t t I

b]'.,,7%p,tr. . . g ')( ! :.

ti

'i' p,

. ;. 3._;.B; t[g;::) __

i.--

-e g]myyy . e.

l

",', r 11; _ _

c; -__ _ .=f=O .

Ml .u l o __1719)=uumminngsg

\

M d siM'+ ' W M s gg NOVEMBER 24, 1987 l

l l

l

. c .

AGENDA o INTRODUCTION ( BOB CROLEY )

o BOLTING ( TOM REDICAN )

o MATERIALS MANAGEMENT ( TOM REDICAN )

o CURRENT SCHEDULE AND LONG RANGE SCOPE LIST ( LEE FOSSUM )

o FIRE PROTECTION ( KURT ZIMMERMANN )

o EXIT -

SUMMARY

REMARKS ( BOB CROLEY )

RANCHO SECO SCEBELING & CETAG3 MANAG3M3N" .

X3C PRES 3XTAT.ON NOVEYBER 24,1987 .

i m SCHEDULE OVERVIEN a RESTART SCOPE LIST UPDATE a LONG RANGE SCHEDULE 1

nrca1124

o

(

  • SMUD RRNCHO SECO RESTRRT MILESTONE SUMMRRY MILESTONE ACTUAL /

FORECRST m COMPLETE OTSG OUTRGE 23 JAN 87 A E FILL AND VENT RCS 21 MRR 87 A E FILL 'A' DECRY HERT TRRIN 27 MAY 87 A s FILL ' B' DECRY HERT TRRIN 81 JUL 87 A B COMP. TDI DIESEL PREOP TESTING 12 RUG 87 A E START EFIC COLD FUNCTIONRL TESTING 2S AUG 87 A

  1. a START ILRT 30 RUG 87 A a CONDENSER VRCUUM 8 OCT 87 R a LOSP RND ESF RCTURT10N 13 NOV 87 A a INITIAL PLRNT HERT UP 5 DEC 87 F a START OTSG SECONDARY HYDRO 6 DEC 87 F a START HOT SHUTDOWN TESTING 9 DEC 87 F a REACTOR STARTUP 15 JAN 88 F l

1987 1988 SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB c0NCENSER VRcUUlt -

M 007 B E DE R

60V RS g;p;;,,SELEaTuaE. actuation ;

g_ og,g.,

=

ELEcTarc 01sTRIBUT10N DEC R$4 Loss GF 0FF SITE POWER - '

RERCTOR COOLANT FILL b

!N!!!"Pi!!wi!*IQiT4estat sc 'v u' itilisi';IC?iTics  :

a Wv %

28n!.n20?!!!"?sovaTER " Tv'tT "

sir #W8c!Oni"'iYn!:I * #E!*.

!!!!Wi%T " " " " * "!!c'o ftMIN STERf1 DEC' 17 OTSC HYORO C=3 PLANT HERT UP & TESTING ' '

8 DE4 S LH N 12 REMCTOR STARTUP '

m ---

w, 4 t -

B RANCHO.SECO i -

CRITICAL PATH

SUMMARY

Week Ending Friday .

l Nov 20 Nov 27 Deo 4 Deo 11 Deo 18 Dec 25 Jan 1Jan 8 Jan 16 Jan 22 111l1ll1tllltllf1l11trltll11111l1111tlll11 1tll1111tlt1ll11 TDI Diesel Tests i  !  ! i i

! i i

/  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :

l Loss of Off Site Power Test i  !  !  !  !

: 's.  :

Systems Operable for RCS Fill l j j j j j j RCS Fill & Vent .

Primary System Testa  ! !l  :

1.'. ,5  !  !  !

RCS Heat Up for Hydro i  ! I 1 i i i i i

:  : :s  :  :  :  :  :

OTSG Hydro

.s .-

: - r.  :  :  :  :  :

Sys Operable for Cond Vacuum  :  :  :  :  :  :

Draw Vacuum  :  :  :  :  :

Secondary System Tests  !  !

I I i i i i i i Hot Shutdown Testing  !  ! I I  :  :  :  : I Reactor Start Up  :  :  :

Schedule Actual crtpth24

a SCH3DCE CONCERXS -

4 s

l u TRANSITION TO OPERATIONS m PAPER CLOSURE m STRESS SAFETY, QUALITY & SCHEDULE l

l l

r nreb1124 ,

' ~

w. 1 RANCHO SECO RESTART SCOPE LIST UPDATE RESTART SCOPE LIST OPEN CLOSED TOTAL RSL Management Items 432 297 729 RSL System Related Items 314 98 412 TOTAL RSL Items 746 395 1141 LONG RANGE SCOPE LIST OPEN CLOSED TOTAL LRSL Management Items 1195 229 1424 LRSL System Related Items 454 51 505 TOTAL LRSL Items 1649 280 1929 rsistot ,

! E RESTART SCOPE LIST

. MONTILY SUMMA 3Y i

i TOTAL ITEMS NEY RSL 272 LRSL ' 297 l COMPLETED RSL l

395 LRSL 280 TRANSFERRED RSL to LRSL 53 LRSL to RSL 104 l

1 1

rsisumm 1

1 R3 stilt TO LONG 3ANG3 SCOPE TRAXSFE3S m P.A.G. APPROVED a JUSTIFIED i

a CATEGORIES a PROCEDURE CHANGES a COMPENSATORY MEASURES a SSR ADMINISTRATIVE UPGRADES a IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS nrec1124

)

RSL/LRS1 X3W IT3M SKRCES i .

m EASTRP FINDINGS

= B&T SRTP REVIEW u SYSTEM YALKDOWNS a CONTINUED AUDIT & IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS nred1124

l RAXC30 SECO .

LONG RAXGE SCH3DCLs ~ ,

i m WORK PLAN OVERVIEY a DESIGN CHANGE EXAMPLE i

a SCHEDULE DETAIL a

SUMMARY

SCHEDULE RESULTS l .

l 1

l l

nrce1124 -

l

i .,

l s. .

RANCHO SECO -

LONG RANGE SCHEDULE WORKPLAN OVERVIEW 1987 1988 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr iiiliiiliiil l l 1 l i i li e i i  !  !  !  !*

Long Range Schedule  ! i  ! i Update LRS C l l l l Issue LRS i i i i i i  !  !  !  !

i i i i i Integrated Living Schedule  !  ! j i i Establish ILS Content  ! I  : 1 i j j Draf t ILS i i I  : I i i Begin ILS Negotiations '

! l j i  !

Programmatic Changes i i i i

i Re prioritization l  : I  !

l  !

Implement LRS Process  ! l  :  : i  :

Eliminate RSL j j l ,

i i i i i LRS hiaintenance i i i i i Afonthly Reviews l  ! l l l Issue First Quarterly Rpt i  ! j j j i i  !  !  !

Schedule .

Ac tu al leswrk e

EXAM.= 2 Printed:

10/2//37 Pa;e:

7:03:41 * * *

  • RSL/LRSL Tracking Systes * * *
  • 1

Report RSLN6 Long Range Scope List - Version: 882487 Table RSL Pete Break None Ites Designator: PBS Resolution: A) INSTALL LADDERS AND PLATFCP ID Number -

MAINTERNCE PERSCNEL lEED TO ACCESS.

M ILIARY AND NSEB ROCFS.

282?

Priority: 3 .

Date Last Modified 10/27/87 Source Document, F3!

Scope increase? (Y/N): N PA6 Approval Required:

6ateClosed:

Description:

A) THERE IS A NEED FOR LADCERS AND RATFORMS FOR HAG TO GET B) CN M ILIARY AND 0 NSEB RCCTS THERE IS NO HAND MILING AND F00TIta IS DIFFICtLT.

Comments: INFORMATICN WAS TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM T)E MOST AP JUSTIFICATION:

TEPXMRY HAND MILS IWS BEEN EFICTED LWTI Cross Reference Documents:

21.8137 PBS.97 Closure Docuents:

. ECNITBD)

_h-

RANCHO SECO

, LONG RANGE SCHEDULE ,

g .

GENERIC. SCHEDULE LOGIC i

it.m for Plant Betterment Iterna It.m tdantification Approval

'~ l .. . . ,.

, ' o\D D66st,il Design Package Configuration

-* g 1AODEA5 RAsutJ6 U Pdote Design bpc0 Ag ^W 4 "(AMGM 55 8 e*5

. un, e on, u, ,,y -

. = * -- O l

['

~

gggg 2 Dur I6W. # . ,

Purchase l Place PO 52E.o S Delivery i

's , 9 40 s uabr Equip g3yo, Dur - ~~-

l 3 ,

x s

s if4rALL LADoERS A*JD Ada((s 81'.(8 tAst ru3 ! ,, T/O to ipp20 Modify '4 j

$40000008 7 Mty- M pur iW T..t .- In b0 [; ./

Se in In '

CNCLG 3 w'(*'"*g otsoutag, Pr- '  ! Ops -

g. Acc pt Test

"' cyci. out i ota r

. I gru Ir 5

260 ~A "" <D

. \s . Ead of:

I ac 4E 40 s narues out ((

I(-cvciei

' uhr .

! pp j Package

-pgg so ,_2 Y ; -;Ad tyci. out j D* -,

l l FL. Il3 pur 2 l

, Pacl< age Closure  !

I j '! .

. F F,fo 415 - 21 Olyf

-  ; I 61,700 g ., Approval 1

#0- ~ N.A '

Test Procedures '4 "7f ,) l l ,

~

g g Whr 7 ,

{j i i Performance pur \~~'/

l: Training  ! i v M " I # "9 Plant Procedures / \ luar cornplot* -

l Miiestones (p = wod. -

Training -

40.~

g" V '

"M

)

s ts - res 55 Plan t/ System / Train / 'a 8'a" -

ut r s.rvic. _F in s.~lo. 3RH - 7 ,

Equipment Availability -

~

'*'*" ~'

insruic

- . - -.~. .

ECN No'..?_9h048

4 p-1 -

= , ._

e4MFW

,, ,, .,,,.}

c s ,

- ~. - -

, \ ,

.1 d -

) J s N -

- - ls ,

s N- - .s .s s s - - .s

- o.-

oo  %- 4 O  %-_ _ _

u s o -

W

=

s s s_ s s

s N %_

s s

- -- s

g. - - .

g - - - -

m. k .

e e .-..

- e e

=

e e - .o e ,,

- - e o e

- .e .e e o -

e a

- e e e .e ,

W o -e e -

e - - b e o - e e e u -

e 4 ,

u e- a -

e

- e e to - - .e e e

.a to - re co e- -

- e e .

- m. .r.n e - - .e e e w - a - -

u m w - .eJ .e.) .e e -

. D. w - .e ) .a p

.u z e i.

e m - e e e

=

e - - o e

.a . - e e -

e

- e

.e,, a - - o -

e g .e .e .a "e"l a

2 w e e e a o - e a -

e

- .e s -

,. e o e -

e

- e e e w- u -

o e-- - _e e - - -

s. e - _e se_ e

.J.

eu o u> .e e

- . .e

.e. -

.e

_e _e o

e. -

e .e.

.e aw%w eo a a n a

e

.e n

=

e

_ .e y 3 u - - - .n e 5 ." *' > *3 4 9T 8' .e .-.

.uw y v v

.u sa v r r t =='

-, ,e m O _e_ e r'\ r r - .a .e .e a s -

g g >. .

- r r r r

- .e .e-

- r

, gg g .

- - - r r

g , g.- -- -

l g g 4- . _

g

' e e 1

- - - \ >

l s s *. -

u - -

e e

I'* ,

0 - -

.a i .

w t

in w 9 -,

is u -

n.o \n. m .c3l",

a '- a se . -

l i

3

  • x x

N x

x -

x

- g in o e X x - - - - - .x l' w - - .x x x x .x

. o -x

.x 1

i i o u x- !xx e -x 1xx -

x x -.

x x

~ _x x

00 ' u I - x x I x,o 1 i - .x x x l -x x 1 - - I -

, x x .e - { .x x lA -

.o Qs x -

.x 8

8. g,9 $

x o

  • -x z -x 5x x . -= x e x

.x a.

Nw ~ * ~ " -x 64 e x -

x

  • x 5 x g w ~ ~ ~ x '

x

~

g u o, 2= -,

, e g

.i . -

8 ~

= -

- -- a i w * -

h - , s

  • t4 e.*

o o.o g -

8 -

s  :- - ,-

%ii

., .i a m o_  ; _ e _- '

5 e

8 c.-

.u ('NJ a

=

%e."--.- 5

\g _ -

w

- i s B

=

O 5 _ __ _w o

" 8'"

- \- 0 -

6 -

> - u - S

. Q. 3  % 3 - * - - ] - w

- - - - o W \ 3 o - - m G 4" f'JJ  ? g. - = - g s

y o e

- 4 - E- .'

T  !, -

a z

I s

i. J T .- -- N a - -

\- 'N - --

a C c_ ,.  %

\ _

/-

wi cii S Hu O d, ',

- J *

, \ '\

~d = ., e

' \

1 o - - e u \ r N a" o -

.e, ) e a

e e

Ww _. u e - -

ex

=

euu.

.e.) - .e e e a '

e oaw e .

.e i m.

ei o!

-.4 E

- - .e .m i ei ele o

_ _ _ , , . ~ - . -

6-

.g gyg,:e--

m u

~.

=4 e . ..

.4 #

E .i D

k. 4

. z u

b \

_\

E .

N

\

g u

e G .e g 11 0 N

5 -

3. -

E

. E- :. o in O I N E 5

. [$

= o. . E a

nl .

s p.

ee W*

N E "

OU d R $ $ ". t!* \

g =M 3: E'E I"! u!"! :.

E e. .

N: e o

.o.

=

=>.

w m

3" N N

. o -

w s u O

.$ E i

i '

c o

.J  :

%4 o - -

  • N, 4 O O s' Q

a

  • 1 A

+._

U c]

__ ._ _ _ _ w_ bl

- - M N.- q M 5 -

, 5 E %$5s y -

5- -

4 Q 2 w 5 EE 7 E Z w a og D.

E : I '_ Nw N: E E E a m N

M C se u

~_ aa. ~ _

o o_ %.

oi -

' ' _ _t -e s

o 9

  • ._ o_

9.,,

e og o g

mJ 5

ad ,

w]

t i w

$ 5 J'~.a# 3) "J 9a J uJ od 4 o'

y n4 0 N _J 5

! yi 2 [.g- h.~'Y 2 o,e [ 2+ 2.*h g vi M o x-s 1

,+ i 51 e-

  • oi-5s +vi 2 [s- h 2 [ G ] 2 ] 2 [

cc] 5 + c-vi g eq

. I o, el ic e

,, g g aedss cieqg ~

w

- g

%\-

o i gm~ -

4. N 1 w""" 48 r~ os a w 41 G*'

o i g- osmog c 3,g i i

  • o ias~

gg o_ G t-"", *'"

Ni -~

Ni C t .08 c]u_ NiJ..g Ne's. 4 \ (y sos g 4',.~."*

$ L3 (Q

_s- .

o] o] N ie,. eWh e ' N i .g di.~

@@@ G m

_%1

'N,,,,, [9 3 *a.tj .bk a O,,,, l O  :,.

N . OJ

*t.1 i .

. -.1 *'*J

._ 3 "_J i

  • E 5'?] * "J "

11S E 8 8 8 8 8 '?J

=

N s=

N 8  !

t, .

LONG CANGE SCl1EDULE PROGRAJ RUN DATE 35EPS7 0948NRS .

$,CZAME::T3 COUNTY, CA. -

ACTIVITY LISTING

  • 4 PROJECT: LONRANGE SACRAM PROJECT START- 3AUGir7

......................... ENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITV DISTRICT O

t ACTIVI1Y I WORM ITEM DE

....................e............................................................e.RIGINAL I I5V5 t IQTS NUM/ I E ARI.V tEARLY COMPL. 10AUG96 ILATE ILATE I IOT ITEM f55R I BUDGET

.......................SCRIPTION.....................................f DUR.........................,.ISTART.......................T IFINt 5at ISTAR IFINISH t FL T E00226044 NE-REVIEW ACTIONS / DESIGN ECN 2-0260-08 60 P85 007 2l0137 23JUN89 155EP89 IFES90 25APR90 155 COO 426044 MC-REVIEW / PROCURE MATERIALS ECM Z-0260-08 40 PBS 007 250437 18AUG89 130CT89 29 MAR 90 23MAV90 lbb C00826044 MD-INCORPORATE MODS ECN Z-0260-08 28 P85 007 210837 140CTB9 IONOV89 24MAY90 20JUN90 222 Col 026044 NT-TEST ECH Z-0260-08 14 P85 007 210137 4NOV89 171;0V89 14JUN90 27JUN90 222 600726044 NE-CONFIGURATION UPOATE ECH Z-0260-OP

. 5 P85 007 2l0537 13NOV89 17HOV89 21JUN90 27JUN90 154

  • 401626044 OP-CLOSE PACMAGE ECN 2-0260-08 0 PBS 007 210137 20NOV89 17NOV89 28JUN90 27JUN90 65700 854 x

3

/ T> ~

, ()

e k

l

L ,e

RANCHO SECO NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (Fire Barrier Breaches)

Graph Depicts as of the morning of 11-23-87 -

4 Electrical Breaches = 55 Mechanical Breaches = 1 Doors = 6 Dampers = 5 Total Breaches = 67 Note: Since printing of graph 24 additional penetration seals were restored to operable status and/or removed from the report due to not being Technical Specification required. This brings the total inventory of penetration down to the following:

Mechanical / Electrical = 33 Breaches Doors = 6

, Dampers = 5 Total Breaches = 44 m

p 8 .

1sl ** t . ^,*h . * =~.

,. % l

?r s. . .

'w

-T.' ~.~i %=

p-yy~-

-~

_' j.c:-. g a.1::*-

1 w.,..: , .y .e. ; . , .o

.7.._

, - - - ,. W. ,

- -- - - - . . m t .- ]..; Q,

]-

- A..._

..i. .... n.

.s.

w -- - - .. J r1 ..

.: 4 <, . .

N :2.w.:a;W1.W. ..:g. . .9 'h: . . FIRE BARRIER BREACHES '

r-e: .

.e

. a. . , (,. ..

,: ese -  ;. -

.?.- r. .

- r. vyp': ..u

er .

= g . W. :g.. -

.s -

..' g

. 400 6 i

..' .. g i . .

. ; ; M, ,a,.. .. l 350 -

't '. 8 I. - I a., .

~

l

- - .. . i. ... a. . . g -

g I aCs

' , . soo - .

mar. OPan - .

te arATut

-: .g. .: !. -: PrwrTRATroNs .- --: '; .\ -

. .tanEACann rzas ';y.= -

3-I namazzas . . . fQk .' :. :

n. .

I

.. 18. - Vk . .:.. gr .p/ . ? y. I 4*g ':. ..

4 OPEtt ELECTRICA*.

. l -

.$. g PIMITRAT.IQtI8%.cs .

- i 9.t e,.. -.y *HT.e

~ g l- att I

. .s,4.f,.:.,g- . . '. -

~

. ' . *' ' .k- 7. -

l 130 .

. .- l

~ ,^ ? - i 100 -- *

- 4.. .

I t g .

. OPEN MECHANICAL St l

  • . . . .[ 5 Pend DAMPER PENETRATIC:43

. Q-PENETRATIONS p 0P318 000R DOOR l PLANT MODIFICATIONS PENETRATI0lia cANFra ,t.AND MAINTENANCE

% - -- - - - - - MECHANICA A REFAIR COAL

.,,. . . . . . . , w. e , . . ... . . . . . . . . . .m..- -

i 8/33 7/20 ks{w;... , 8/17 9/14 j-

, '.i j' 10/12 11/, - 12/7 1/4 2/1

, . e- ...,.n - n .,.,,.., . -

. n.: -

  • .%, . w* N '.d. .g; . .
  • g '*:* ,

g... *.. ,...

u,,a.u p.,

m .

e o & . I q'" ' . Mme ., .. *

.'r-

. .g . .

. . . ,3 - .- ,

sa s ... ,- .. ..

s .

v.

vs

  • 2_ f L _ ,

CO2 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS (Operability Status) 22 Total Technical Specification Required Systems Restart Projection

, All systems are expected to be operable.

4 As a compensatory measure to ensure compliance with administrative process for entrance / exit into CO2 zones, fire watch patrols have been established assuming system automatic features are inoperable.

When system automatic features are technically inoperable, fire detection and manual operating features of the CO2 systems remain operable.

post Restart Corrective Actions Modification to CO2 systems to include flashing red lights, abort stations and removal of the system isolation switches from the CO2 panels.

Following the above modification and associated procedure revisions, the fire watch patrols will be eliminated.

  • CO2 zone entry will occur with systems in service.

... a FIRE PROTECTION WATER SUPPRESSION (Operability Status)

~

Systems Inoperable .

d Ground fault on det3ction system for Auxilliary Feed water deluge system.

Turbine Building sprinkler system water demand design requirement marginal. Engineering completing review for acceptability.

TOI Diesel Building pre-action sprinkler systems (2) to be operable prior to restart.

em-vn -

  • '. =, .

V .

FIREpROTEChl0N'0ETECT10NSYSTEMS (Operability Status) .

_ Systems Inoperable i

Zones 13

- Out of service to install additional detectors.

Zone 110 - Ground fault on detection system.

Zones 105, 106 - TDI Diesel Building systems (to be in next revision of Technical Specifications) systems to be operable prior to restart.

]

y v M'