(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
|---|
Category:ARCHIVE RECORDS
MONTHYEARML17292B6881999-04-15015 April 1999
Quality Dept Audit Rept for WNP-2 Emergency Preparedness Program.
ML17292B6591998-10-0606 October 1998
Calculation Mod Record CMR-98-0243, Fracture Mechanics Evaluation of N1A Nozzle Safe End.
ML17292B6581998-05-29029 May 1998
Rev 0 to ME-02-98-04, Fracture Mechanics Evaluation of N1 Safe End.
ML17292B6151998-05-26026 May 1998
Rev 0 to Calculation ME-02-98-04, Fracture Mechanics Evaluation of N1 Nozzle Safe End.
ML17292B3681998-04-10010 April 1998
Audit 298-008, WNP-2 Emergency Preparedness Program.
ML17292A8391997-03-31031 March 1997
Audit 297-005, WNP-2 Emergency Preparedness Program.
ML20134P1221996-11-27027 November 1996
Press Release IV-96-60, NRC Staff Proposes $100,000 Fine for Apparent Violations at WNP-2
ML20134M2121996-11-22022 November 1996
Press Release 96-165, NRC Begins First of Series of Design Insps at Nuclear Power Plants
ML20134G0321996-11-0808 November 1996
Press Release IV-96-59, Nrc,Supply Sys Officials to Discuss Performance at WNP-2
ML20134D2261996-10-17017 October 1996
Press Release IV-96-56, Nrc,Supply Sys Officials to Discuss Apparent Violations at WNP-2
ML17292A6111996-07-12012 July 1996
Rev 0 to Pressure Locking Evaluation for RCIC-V-31.
ML17292A6101996-07-12012 July 1996
Rev 0 to MOV Pressure Locking Calculation.
ML17292A1481996-04-0303 April 1996
WNP-2 Emergency Preparedness Program Audit.
ML20077R8141994-12-31031 December 1994
Package Consisting of Summary of Transactions,Statement of Transactions,Assets Acquired,Assets Disposed of,940630-1231 & Asset Summary,Asset Summary Adjusted for Accruals,List of Assets & Fixed Income Maturity analysis,941231
ML17291A1971994-06-30030 June 1994
Package Consisting of Summary of Transactions,Statement of Transactions,Assets Acquired,Assets Disposed Of,Brokerage Summary & Revalued Gain/Loss Info from 930630 - 940630
ML17290A5181993-06-30030 June 1993
Package Consisting of Summary of Transactions,Statement of Transactions,Assets Acquired,Assets Disposed Of,Brokerage Summary & Revalued Gain/Loss Info for Period 920630-930630
ML20085M5961991-11-11011 November 1991
Response to NUMARC Survey Re Waste Mgt,Aquatic Resource & Socioeconomic Questions in Support of NRC License Renewal Rulemaking.Document Undated
ML20129F4831985-05-0909 May 1985
Package of Compilations of Results of Operator Licensing & Requalification Exams
ML17276B6251982-09-28028 September 1982
Slide Presentation Entitled, Corporate Organization & Mgt. Organizational Charts Encl
ML20079E0811981-10-21021 October 1981
Slide Presentation to NRC Caseload Forecast Panel,811021-23. Related Info Encl
ML17276A1801981-09-15015 September 1981
Presentation on Number of OBE Fatigue Cycles for BWR NSSS Design (Except Piping).
ML19337B4331980-09-18018 September 1980
Viewgraphs of SRV Discharge Loads Improved Definition & Application Methodology to Mark II Containments.
ML19337B4351980-09-18018 September 1980
Viewgraphs of, Improved SRV Discharge Load Definition.
ML19337B4361980-09-18018 September 1980
Viewgraphs of, Caorso Single Valve Tests,Evaluation of Pressure Data Base.
ML19337B4391980-09-18018 September 1980
Viewgraphs of, Improved Design Load Spec for Single Valve Discharge.
ML19337B4401980-09-18018 September 1980
Viewgraphs of, Structural Modeling Refinement & Development of Improved Analytical Procedures.
ML20213D3281980-09-18018 September 1980
Viewgraphs Entitled, Safety/Relief Valve Discharge Loads, Improved Definition & Application Methodology to Mark II Containments
ML19320A5101980-05-14014 May 1980
Viewgraph from near-term OL Licensing Resolution Group 800514 Meeting W/Nrc
ML19318A4261980-04-10010 April 1980
Slide Presentation Entitled, Safety/Relief Valve Discharge Into Suppression Pool.
ML17272A8871980-02-0606 February 1980
Slide Presentation Entitled Sacrificial Shield Wall: Analysis,Design,Const of Sacrificial Shield Wall.
1999-04-15
[Table view]
Category:PRESS RELEASE OR NEWS ARTICLE
MONTHYEARML20134P1221996-11-27027 November 1996
Press Release IV-96-60, NRC Staff Proposes $100,000 Fine for Apparent Violations at WNP-2
ML20134M2121996-11-22022 November 1996
Press Release 96-165, NRC Begins First of Series of Design Insps at Nuclear Power Plants
ML20134G0321996-11-0808 November 1996
Press Release IV-96-59, Nrc,Supply Sys Officials to Discuss Performance at WNP-2
ML20134D2261996-10-17017 October 1996
Press Release IV-96-56, Nrc,Supply Sys Officials to Discuss Apparent Violations at WNP-2
1996-11-08
[Table view] |
Text
-. - .__ - - - . - .. . - . . . - _.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l Office of Public Affairs, Region IV l Walnut Creek Field Office l 1450 Maria Lane, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 5378 1
CONTACT: Mark Hammond Nov. 27, 1996 Office: (510) 975 0254 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Home: (415) 674 1024 RIV 9660 Pager: (800) 916 4952 e mail: mfh20nrc. gov NRC STAFF PROPOSES $100,000 FINE FOR APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT WNP 2 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has informed the Washington Public Power Supply System that it proposes to fine the utility $100,000 for five apparent violations of NRC requirements at the Washington Nuclear Project 2 (WNP 2), near Richland, Washington.
The violations were identified during a special NRC inspection conducted from late June through early September. They occurred on various dates in June as the plant returned to power generation after a refueling outage.
One violation was cited because plant personnel advanced through a series of defined steps in the restart process while one train of the control room emergency filtration system was inoperable, contrary to requirements. The reactor systems were warming up at the time, but the plant was not generating power. The filtration system is designed to protect control room personnel from radiation under accident conditions.
Three other violations were noted in the Supply System's failure to conduct required tests on certain equipment during the restart process. A fifth violation was found in the Supply System's failure to have an adequate procedure in place to test certain valves prior to the restart.
- *Although the violations did not result in actual safety consequences, the NRC considers the regulatory significance of the violations high, L. Joe Callan, Regional Administrator of NRC Region IV in Arlington, Texas, said in a letter to the Supply System.
Taken collectively, the violations indicate that the Supply System did not maintain an effective program for assuring that required operational checks of equipment were performed at the appropriate times and in accordance with technical specifications,
Mr. Callan said. The number of violations, and the fact that they occurred over a relatively short period of time, suggest a serious weakness in this very fundamental and important area.
l Mr. Callan noted that the Supply System took corrective actions that the NRC considered prompt and comprehensive. We believe it is important to note that the Supply System identified most of the current violations, and important to recognize that this is,
, in and of itself, a sign of improved performance on the part of the Supply System, he l said.
9611270251 961127 PDR PRESS R Re-IV-96-060 PDR O\
The fact that violations with similar causes were noted in August 1995, when the NRC fined the Supply System $50,000, remains a significant concern Mr. Callan said.
The NRC has categorized the violations as Severity Level III. The agency's enforcement system uses four Severity Levels, with Level I being the most serious. The apparent violations were discussed by NRC and Supply System officials at a predecisional enforcement conference on October 22 in Arlington, Texas.
The Supply System has 30 days to respond to the NRC's citation, during which time it may pay the civil penalty or protest it. If the protest is denied, the utility may ask for a hearing.
1 l
l
