ML19337B439
| ML19337B439 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 09/18/1980 |
| From: | BURNS & ROE CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19337B432 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8010020409 | |
| Download: ML19337B439 (13) | |
Text
_
9 IMPROVED DES!GN LOAD SPECIFICATION FOR SINGLE VALVE DISCHARGE NNP-2 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS POOR QUAUTY PAGES
l DESIGN LOAD:
C P (MAX.,T) = C
- P(MAX.,T,90/90)*
WHERE:
C = 1.20 IS A FACTOR REQUIRED TO EXTRAPOLATE CAORSO TEST CONDITIONS TO WNP-2 DESIGN CONDITIONS (OBTAINED USING DFFR DATA);
P(MAX.,T,90/90) = P(MAX.,90/90). T(T,90/90) IS THE STATISTICAL ENVELOPE (90/90) 0F CAORSO SINGLE-VALVE DISCHARGE TEST DATA; P (MAX.,90/90) IS THE MAXIMUM PRESSURE AMPLITUDE DERIVED FROM STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF CA0RSO DATA; T (T,90/90) IS THE NORMALIZED TIME HISTORY (FREQUENCY CONTENT) DERIVED FROM STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF CAORSO DATA.
A STATISTICAL STATEMENT O' (90/90) WAS ACCEPTED BY NRC FOR MARK II APPLICATION IN NUREG-0487.
oTATISTICALLY DERIVED MAXIMUM PRESSURE MPLITUDE:
P(MAX., 90/90)
STATISTICAL ENVEl.0PE OF FOURIER AMPLITUDE SPECTRUM:
F (s2, 90/90)
i STATISTICALLY DERIVED NORMALIZED TIME HISTORY:
T (T, 90/90)
TWO TIME HISTORIES CHOSEN, MFP TYPE AND SFP TYPE, F pp (Q,90/90) AND TO ENVELOPE CA0RSO TEST DATA:
3 F pp (S,90/90), RESPECTIVELY.*
3 TO ACCOUNT FOR VARIABILITY IN CHARACTERISTIC FREQUENCY OBSERVED DURING CA0RSO TESTS (VALVE "A") AND EXPECTED IN OTHER PLANTS AND/OR DIFFERENT SRVDL GEOMETRIES, THE SELECTED TIME HISTORIES ARE COMPACTED AND EXPANDED SO THAT THE CHARACTERISTIC FREQUENCY COVERS THE RANGE:
4.0Hz4f412.0Hz.
c SIGNIFICANT CONSERVATISM IS INTRODUCED BY THIS PROCEDURE.
COULD BE EXPRESSED ALTERNATELY IN TERMS OF PRESSURE RESPONSE SPECTRUM:
Rypp (c,90/90) AND R pp (W,90/90),
3 RESPECTIVELY.
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF PRESSURE YERTICAL DISTRIBUTION o
DERIVED FROM CAORSO DATA b
CONFIRMED WITH TOKAI-2 DATA o
CONFIRMED WITH ACOUSTIC PCOL ANALYSIS CIRCUMFERENTIAL DISTRIBUTION o
CA0RSO AND TOKAI-2 INSTRUMENTATION (PRESSURE SENSOR DISTRIBUTION) INADEQUATE o
OBTAINED FROM ACOUSTIC FOOL ANALYSIS o
SIMILAR TO DISTRIBUTION RECOMMENDED IN DFFR-REV. 3.
1
f sug?ACf
/ oot
/
' ~~
(
s,
,,,, ' ' ~
- .o
'N J
\\,
T f.
I
\\
I 4
.\\
t 1
-\\
l l
P Io T
l b
\\
l E
e so -
\\.
l
=
C-l si
\\.
i
\\,
l
' P 11
\\
l
/5* -
\\
I N
i r
.r l+
\\
\\'
)
20 -
g QUENCF.r"R
/004 do r rom 3333 g N 3 /Pl9 j
0.2.
- o. +
- 0. 6
_o. s t, o NORMALIIED PRESSURE a
LEGEND
- ,otm 4uara 7 scu s e s, O
MA CMUM MEASURED VALVES AT CACRSO or GLEAits mar w uot a
CACRSO DATA CORRESPCNDOiG TO (90/90)
LDTEAR DISTR 3C"'ICN USED ri THIS STUDY
$p qucNeac4 sverar&GENcr DFFR RECCMMCIDED WASHINCTCN PtJBLIC PC%T.R SUPPLY SYs-Ex NCRMALIIED VERTICAL DISTRIEUTICN FICE NUC:J.AR PROJECT NO. 2 OF PCOL SOUNDARY PRESSURES
P a -..' ~.
s
/
/
/
h a
/
4
,/
\\\\t, g
-~ '
\\cuascusa
+ss
@9W, a
1 L E G G. M o DFFR RECOMME:TDED RESULTS OBTAETED FRCM ACCUSTIC PCCL A:iALYSIS WAs!!I:!CTO:' PUDLIC PO'M.R SUPPLY SYSTE:t O DaTLI.CD DICTRInLrIcu r:mir OF PCCL f:OU' DARY PRESSURES NUCI.CMI PROJEC7 NO. 2 (A7 CO37AI;;3p,37),
o s
el ^Q O
O
" In 4 9
,V N O
d &
u+
1 Z oy a
,1 _,o w @a 2, M On9 I
d Z Zc u oo I
(7 @L tu m 18-i C,O aa2 0
l-2 w
i
- s G
me or I
"o m-
/
/
/
/
_c
's J s'N.N.
\\
/
O 3
O W
C d
C c
w a
m m
o d
d d
0 C
O 054)3bnSS3td OESIGN EPv7!CPE FREC GNCY SPECTRA r::;tntz wasEI3stmas PUBLIC PCWE3L SCFFLY STREBt COM.?ARISCN '41
- MF SGSECC r" 6.Sa m Pnm n 2 ACT"ATICN :nTS (90/90)
l W
0-O
_O o.J
.5 8
eU
)
I CZ Cu M > t-l
- 3. Z Z 1
O'mv o
33 NO&
(
2uw u Gd f':
04 c
a z zoo cce 1,
su
'6 0. 0-6 yW
.' ~o i
uuLL m y AQ ta tn l
O Il I
l Et i
I 3
e l
- \\
w d
/I _g u.
//
//
'(.
,3 I
,.9
-e
-V A
N%
M
\\
C\\
s
=
s a
=
o b
b h
0S4 3tOSSTsad wkr,h m mu="M SCFFU m CES IGN WEI.CPE FPlCCENC*l S PEC' IRA na C MPARISCN W:=g 37p sg3sgqt;3,,*
M P E M NO. 2
- 6. 3'~-
-^C*,3
, CN ITS*S (EWEMPE AND 90/9C '
.w_
ma..~..- e
.-r_u 5
4 60-LEGENb DESIGN ENVELOPE (CA005 h
,E" MFP SUBSEQUENT (W90) dl so-5 j
b I
l s
oNu 3-E%9 3
'4 bl U V
f' 0 '
E
\\
l e j,j q 2o.
n
.- - - ' s,
~
s q to g
./
's~._...'
i,,), i,., N
.u.s m
(1) *Y sy5 R, i>
io -
f 8n";
j
- c. i.i
.tj fl
/
g o,,
0 to 20 30 4o 50
- ,,.ij
- N FREQUENCY (HI)
w Eo o
n.3 e
o uJ
/
e>
O2
/
u t. M
/
i L p. H C2 Z l
J W
g u
c
,o e
.\\l
>n 2w,w
/ Il we$
((
ee@e g
0 2 0
1
$ 3AS
\\4
_o E u uom e z
.,5 l
1 o
/
2
/
w l
a
</
o&
su
,7 oc
/
L
(/
(g
\\
7 l.
1
.sf c
_. - Q
. r -== %
m4 o
i
,o o
o o
e o
m e
w (Iq a) *3 3 Os$33d NNNNN tzs:ca nT;z:.caz.usPCusz 2?Ic aA r:=:Pz I
COMPARISCN *C*H S?? SU3SECUEZ e PnOJECT 1M. 2 4 es AcetAT CN TzSTS (ETTE.* Ops Ann 90/90)
~