ML19337B433

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Viewgraphs of SRV Discharge Loads Improved Definition & Application Methodology to Mark II Containments
ML19337B433
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 09/18/1980
From:
BURNS & ROE CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19337B432 List:
References
NUDOCS 8010020400
Download: ML19337B433 (14)


Text

.

9 SRV DISCHARGE LOADS I:!PRC'/EJ DE?I?lITI001 AilD APPLICATIO ! ".ETHODCLOGY TO l! ARK II C0flTA!liliEllTS PRE?AREJ 3Y BUR?!S AliD RCE, I?!C.

FOR APPLICATICtl TO WASHINGT0il PUELIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM WilP-2 THis DOCUMEilT CONTAINS POOR QUAllTY PAGES i

8 010 0 2 0V00'

SRV DISCHA.?CE C'/ '!T DESCRI3ED IN OFFR - RE/. 3 IN sui 2ARY, AFTER SRV ACTUATION THE FCLLOWI?iG E/E?lTS TAXE PLACE SEGUEilTIALLY.

SR'/ OPE.'lS; STEA.'1 FR0ii ?!AIN STEAfi L!.'IES FL0t.is INTO Af!D PRESSURIZES THE SRV DISCHARGE LINE (SRVDL);

lIATER INITIALLY Ill SRVDL IS DISCHARGED I'1TO SUFFRESSI0il FOOL;

- AIR INITIALLY Ill SRVDL IS DISCHARGED INTO SUFFRESSION FOOL; ST A!1 FLOWS THROUGH QUENCHER HOLES AND CONDENSES I'l THE SUFFRESSION FOOL.

P9ESE'!T 59V Discu;;gE Lean gE:!;t!Tig.il i

THE LOAD IS DE?It!ED AS SR'l " AIR EU33LE'.' LOAD AllD IS SPECIFIED AS A " RIGID 'dALL" PRESSURE LOAD ACTINC.2.': THF.

SUPPRESSI0ti PCOL WETTED PERIMETER.

THE LOAD SPECIFICATION IS DESCRI3ED IN DFFR-REV. 3 AflD COISISTS OF THE FOLL0t!ING ELEMENTS:

I.

PEAK (POSITIVE AtlD !iECATIVE) PRESSURE i

AEPLITUDES; II.

AN IDEALIZED PRESSURE TIME HISTORY (FREQUENCY CONTENT);

III.

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION FOR PRESSURE, AND A METHOD FOR C0fiBI.'ll.'!G MULTI?LE SRV DISCHARGE EFFECTS.

l

RES?ONSES OF WNP-2 CONTAI.'E.'lT STRUCTURE CALCULATED USIlG PRESENT/DFFR-REY. 3 LOAD DEFI.'lITI0fl ARE UNREALISTICALLY LARGE.

l SRV SINGLE ' <- /E - SUBSECUENT i

SSE 4

i RPV SUPPORT I

I i

10.3 I

j L

b HORIZCNTAL L

i L

L t

i l

i 4.)

=

m j

3.0b r- - s l

i E

I i

O l

5 i

\\

i i

e- - -

=

l I

I l

i w

i i

i 1

I D

l

\\

N

\\

y 1.3 g

j

'i L

t I

i'

~

l

'l

~

F s

/

\\f 7

y 1

i l

~

i I

.4 -

I

,I

\\<

1 x

3*

r-.,

\\

I i

I

.2 1

.- - i j

i I

4

.3 1.0 1.2 1.62.02.4 3.2 4.0 6.J 3.3 10. 12 15 ;0 24 32 40 FRECUENCY (Hz)

WPPSS - NUCLEAR PROJECT 22 Surns and Roe, fnc.

11/7/79 I

f

=.. -

._.._ =

i 1

  • ed J

SRV $1NCLE VALVE - SUBSECUENT SSE RPV SUPPORT io i

[

VERTICAL

~

i l

i l

l t

4L f

3-l i

m i;

2-I I,

i-3 i

e-p I

\\

l I

I s

=

1 l

.F l

a t.o L-'

y u

U

\\

f 3 I I

1 l

i i

o o

i F.1

.4

(.

i

.3 -

f

't I

.2 f

~

t

(

J i

r I

.4

.s

.s i

1.2 1.s 2 2.4 3.2 4

s a to 12 is zo :4 22 ao FREQUENCY (H2)

I A

WPPSS - NUCLEAR PROJECT =2 Burns and Roe, Inc.

11/7/79 6

t L

l SRV SINGLE VALVE - SUBSECUENT SSE s

STABILIZER TRUSS 10.0 i

HORIZONTAL I

L 4.0 -

y

__q L

I t

3.3

,I i

p I

I I

k i

i 2.3 f

t---

a s

i----

=

2

/

l i

i e

i

/

f i ;

o 1.3.

s l

t I I

w j

u l

i, U

i i

W

\\

l s.

~

r y

l A,

.50

.40 l..

1, x

.30

/.

?

1.

/

.20

/

/

(.

/

/

1

/

!s

.4

.6

.3 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 3.2 4.0 5.0 3.310.012.015 J 20 24 32 40 FRECUENCY (H:*)

WPPSS - NUCLEAR PROJECT x2 r

t Burns and Rce, Inc.

11/7e79 I

i

\\

4 1

I J

l i,

SRV SINGLE VALVE - SUBSECUENT

]

l SSE I

1

~

i STABILIZER TRUSS f

10 g

g i i i

F i

t g

VERTICAL i

}

e,TO PEAK 1

VALUEi 3

CF g

22.5 i i a

.g

?

D 4

r.

64

-l g.

It -

i 3-i 4

I ll s

l J

1 g

2 l

Il 8

I g

5 s

i' i

=

i 2

f, O

f i

4 1.3 -

L g.

.. _4..

i

=

l.

I a

t

(

./,*!

a 1

i m

l 0

/

N I

,b f.

I<

e I

t 3. _.

I l

.4

.3

(

i i <

l i

pJ l

~

i.

N

/

i 4

l l

l m..

4

.5 3

t' i.6 2 2.4 3.2 4 6

3 10 12 15 20 24 32 40 FRECUENCY (HZ)

WPPSS - NUCLEAR PROJECT =2 Burns and Ace. Inc.

11/7/7'3

CA0RSO IN-PLANT (FULL SCALD SRV DISCHARGE TESTS BECAME AVAILABLE At!D CONFI?f-iED EXPECTED C0flSERVATISi1 IN LOAD DEFINITION AND PREDICTED STRUCTUPAL RESPONSES.

i i

CONCLUSIONS I.

PRESENT/DFFR SRV DISCHARGE LOAD DEFINITION IS l

CONSERVATIVE.

i II.

STRUCTURAL MODELING TECHNIQUES AND ANALYTICAL i

PROCEDURES PRESENTLY USED TO CALCULATE STRUCTURAL l

RESPONSE TO SRV DISCHARGE LOADS NEED IMPROVEME.'lT.

I i

l i

t 4

1

. ~

  • e OBJECT!'/ES OF T'r!IS STUDY I.

TO DEVELOP AN IMPROVED (.".0RE REALISTIC) SR'l DISCHARGE LOAD DEFINITION FROM AVAILABLE CA0RSO IN-PLANT SRV TEST RESULTS.

II.

TO DEVELOP STRUCTURAL F0DELING TECHNIQUES AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ADEQUATE FOR CALCULATING STRUCTURAL RESPONSES TO SRV DISCHARGE LOADS IN BWR - MARK II GEOMETRY.

i TEST DATA USED IN THIS STUDY IN-PLANT (FULL SCALE) SRV ACTUATION TESTS IMPLEMENTED IN TWO FOREIGN BWR - MARK II PLANTS:

CA0RSO/ ITALY AND TOKAI-2/ JAPAN (SIMILAR TO WNP-2) o THESE PLANTS HAVE SRVDL's EQUIPPED WITH CROSS-QUENCHERS (SIMILAR TO THOSE USED IN WNP-2),

o TESTS INCLUDED SINGLE AND MULTIPLE SRV DISCHARGES, AT INITIAL AND SUBSEQUENT ACTUATION,

e SRV TESTS IN CAORSO PLANT (CONCRETE CONTAINMENT)

TWO SETS OF MEASUREMENTS OBTAINED INDEPENDENTLY BY:

o GE, UNDER "REVAL0TE" PROGRAN, MOSTLY INSIDE PRIllARY CONTAINF.ENT; PRESSURE Af1D ACCELERATION MEASUREMEiTS USED IN THIS STUDY.

o AfiN, UNDER "STRET" PROGRAM, NOSTLY OUTSIDE PRI!1ARY CONTAINNENT; ACCELERATION MEASURE?!ENTS USED IN THIS STUDY.

NOTE:

DIGITIZED DATA AVAILABLE ON MAGNETIC TAPES AND USED IN THIS STUDY TO ACHIEVE THE TWO V.IN OBJECTIVES.

l l

l

1 1

SRV TESTS IN TOKAI-2 PLOT (STEEL CONTAINMENT) i TO DATE, 0.'lLY SuffARY OF 70KAI 2 TEST.1ESULTS AVAILABLE i

AND USED Ifl THIS STUDY AS CONFIR"ATORY DATA (PRESSURES AND ACCELERATIONS).

1 i

I 4

1

-., _ _ -.