ML20112E302

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:26, 17 May 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Equipment Dynamic Qualification:12 Inch,150-lb Motor-Operated Gate Valve
ML20112E302
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/05/1985
From:
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17054B495 List:
References
P304R, NUDOCS 8503260491
Download: ML20112E302 (14)


Text

- ,

t ,.

-w-PVORT NO. Spec. No. P304R NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION CCMPONENT NAME: 12-in., 150'-lb Motor-Operated Gate Valve MARK NUMBERS: 2CCP*MOV18A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION

~

8503260491 850305 PDR ADOCK 05000410 A PDR C3/12177/244/5YH

)

V 1 Sp:;c. Na. P304R REVIEWER'S

SUMMARY

AND EVALUATION

1. COMPONENT NAME: 12-in., 150-lb Motor-Operated Gate Valve
2. TAG NUMBERS: 2CCP*MOV18A
3. QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION A. Qualification Summary of Equipment (PVORT form)

Enclosed B. Referenced Documents in this Package Ref. ID No. Date Organization / Title / Subject

1) Spec. P304R 11/30/83 SWEC/ Specification for Motor-Rev. 2 incl. Operated Carbon Steel Valves Addenda ASME III, Classes 1, 2, and 3 1 through 6
2) E&DCR 11/02/83 SWEC/ Hydrostatic Test Clarifica-No. P01,895 tion
3) E&DCR 06/16/83 SWEC/ Seismic Requirements No. P12,356
4) 0005.521.122.039J 11/23/82 Velan/Mfr's drawing, 8 in.-16 in.

Gate Valve Bolted Bonnet Forged Motor Operator

5) 12177-EP-72F-7 ---

SWEC/ Piping drawing, Closed Loop Cooling Water Piping Reactor Bldg.

6) (LATER)
7) No File Number 11/23/73 Velan/ Seismic Analysis Theory, App. A, Revision C
8) SR6393 Rev. 0 10/12/79 Velan/ Seismic Analysis
9) ST-7003 Rev. 2 11/02/81 Velan/ Operability Test Procedure
10) STRS 05.321.5008B 03/01/84 Velan/ Operability Test Results at the Extremes of Voltage
11) STRS 05.321.5008A 10/12/82 Velan/ Operability Test Results (Lo G)
12) STRS 05.321.5007B 03/01/84 Velan/ Operability Test Results (Hi G)
13) IEEE 05.321.5001C ---

Limitorque/ Qualification Test Report B0058 C3/12177/244/5YH

)

l Spec. Ms. P304R

14) STRS 05.312-5000B 08/27/82 Acton-SWEC/ Actuator Test Report No. 16573-81N, Revision 3 14a) No File Number 06/10/82 NTS-SWEC/ Actuator Test Report No. 548-9291, Revision 2, Volumes 1 through 3 (T47,622; 06/10/82)
15) VEL-NDT-640A(HT) 09/19/77 Velan/ Testing of Nuclear Valves Rev. 8
16) INST 05.321.5000A 09/13/82 Limitorque/ Instruction and Main-tenance Manuals
17) INST 05.320.5006C 12/11/84 Velan/ Maintenance Manual VEL-FBBM
18) No File Number ---

Motor Operator Sizing Calculation

19) W800004 ---

Documentation Package - includes test results for Hydrostatic Testing and Limitorque Motor Tests

20) No File Number ---

SWEC/ Electrical Test Procedure AO.G20.09, ED. GENE.014 (Draft)

4. NINE MILE REQUIREMENTS (dynamic loads, functional requirements)

This motor-operated valve is located in the reactor building closed loop cooling water system (CCP). The functional requirement of this valve is to permit isolation of CCP flow from the spent fuel - fuel pool cooling and cleanup (SFC) heat exchanger EIA.

This valve assembly is required to withstand an acceleration value of approximately 1.5 g for SSE and 1.4 g for OBE conditions along each of the three axes together with the deadweight and valve operating loads (i.e., pressure, temperature, and torque).

5. QUALIFICATION RATIONALE The operability and structural integrity of the valve assembly was assured through an evaluation of all the parameters affecting its function. These include the temperature, pressure, deadweight, operating loads, fluid flow, piping end loads, seismic loads, and the normal and accident environmental parameters. The effects of each of these loads are discussed below.

The thermal effects are considered to be insignificant since the operating temperature range is only between 40*F and 160*F. A conservative design pressure of 720 psi was used in the analysis, which is more than the specification requirement of 200 psi. The fluid flow is 2250 gpm, i.e., about 6.5 ft/see through a 12 in.

diameter pipe, which is small and is not expected to have any effect on the ability of the valve to close. The stresses in the valve body due to the piping end loads were shown to be very small C3/12177/244/5YH

l Spic. No. P30%R (13,000 psi due to SSE) and are not considered sign:.ficant in demonstrating operability of the valve assembly.

The normal and accident environmental parameters are evalsated for all valve body nonmetallic components and the electrical motor operator, and were found acceptable.

Based on the above, it was concluded that the significant loads to be considered for operability are the deadweight, operating and seismic loads. These loads were addressed through a combination of analysis and testing.

The structural adequacy of the valve assembly was ensured through a static analysis (Reference 8).

The functional adequacy of the valve assembly is demonstrated through a combination of tests. The description of each test is as follows:

1. Static Deflection Test: This test demonstrated that there was no bending of the valve stem or any other internal components to jeopardize operability. An identical valve assembly wais also statically deflected up to 11.6 g for further ansurance of operability (References 10, 11, and 12).
2. Valve Operator Test: The motor operator's functional adequacy was demonstrated through an extensive dynamic .

testing program of similar operators. These tests con-sisted of aging, which simulated the normal plant vibra-tion, a series of single frequency tests in the seismic frequency range, and a series of random multifrequency, multiaxis, dynamic tests (References 13, 14, and 14a).

3. Preoperational and Performance Tests: These tests consist of seat leakage, hydrostatic shell, and cyclic tests of the valve assembly (References 15 and 19).
6. QUALIFICATION RESULTS The static stress analysis demonstrated the valve assembly's adequacy to a level of 5.83 g for seismic loading together with the deadweight and operating loads. The static deflection tests of the valve assembly established operability within the specified time and leakage requirements to an acceleration load of 11.6 g. The valve operator's dynamic testing program successfully demonstrated the adequacy of the operator to function to a level of 14.0 g (Reference 14a).

The valve operator's testing program indicated that modifications are required for tightening of screws within the limit switch housing and gap adjustment proceduren. These modifications are being addressed by the implementation of Reference 20 I

C3/12177/244/5YH

, Spse. Ns. P304R

7. FIELD VS. QUALIFICATION MOUNTING (LATER)

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS:

Based on the evaluation of all the applicable parameters, the valve's structural adequacy and functional operability were demon-strated.

The results of the seismic analysis, the valve operability tests, and the motor-operator dynamic tests show that the functional capability of the valve will be maintained during and after the seismic test.

The following programs will also be implemented to ensure oper-ability of the valve assembly:

1. As-built verification of all loading values.
2. Modifications to Limitorque operators Reference 20.

in accordance with

3. In-situ testing of valve assembly.

l l

C3/12177/244/5YH I -)

m Spec. No. P304R Revision 0 PUMP AND VALVE OPERABILITY ASSURANCE REVIEW I. PLANT INFORMATION

1. Name: Nine Mile Point Unit No. 2 2. Docket No.: 50-410
3. Utility: Niasara Mohawk Power Corporation
4. NSSS: General Electric Co. ( ) PWR (X) BWR
5. A/E: Stone & Webster Engineerina Corporation
6. C.P. and/or O. L. SER date 6/24/74 -

II. GENERAL COMPONENT

  • INFORMATION
1. Supplier: () NSSS (X) BOP
2. Location: a. Building / Room Reactor Bldg.
b. Elevation d Pipe 217'-0"
c. System Closed Loop Coolina
3. Component I.D. No. 2 CCP*MOV18A
4. If component is a () Pump complete II.5.

If component is a (X) Valve complete II.6.

5. General P m Data (Not Applicable)
a. Pump b. Prime mover Name Name Mfg. Mfg.

Model Model S/N S/N Type Type

  • The component, whether pump or valve, is considered to be an assembly composed of the body, internals, prime-mover (or actuator) and functional accessories.

C3/12177/244/5YH

a. Pump (Continued) (Not Applicable) b. Prime mover (Continued)

Overall Overall Dimensions Dimensions Weight Weight Mounting Mounting Method Method Required B.H.P. H.P.

Component System Prime Mover Requirements: (include Parameter Desian Normal / Accident normal, maximum and minimum)

Press / Motor (Voltage)

Temp /

Flow /

Head / Turbine (pressure)

Media /,

Required NPSH at maximum If MOTOR list:

flow Duty cycle Available NPSH Stall Current Operating Speed Class of insulation Critical Speed List functional accessories:*

  • Functional accessories are those sub-components not supplied by the manufacturer that are required to make the pump assembly operational, (e.g., coupling, lubricating oil system, speed control sys. , feedback, etc).

l l

C3/12177/244/5YH

F .

6. General Valve Data
a. Valve b. Actuator (if not an integal unit)

Name 12 in.-150 lb Motor-operated Gate Name Motor Operator Mfg. Velan Mfg. Limitorque (VGW-015 P-32Q)

Model No. B18-0054B-02WN Model SMB-0-25 S/N MFG No. 004 S/N 293419 Type Bolted Bonnet Gate Type Motor Operated Size 12 in.-150 lb Size SMB-0-25 Weight 1975 lb Weight 320 lb Mounting Mounting Method Butt Weld Ends Method Bolted to Valve Max. Required Max. Delivered Torque 152 ft-lb Torque 749 ft Ib stall torque @

110% voltage Component System Power Requirements: (include Parameter Desian Normal / Accident normal, maximum and minimum).

Press (PSIG) 200 49/36 Electrical 3 phase, 60 hertz, 575 V Temp (*F) 250 118/33-90 Min - 460 V Flow (GPM) 2250 2410/0 Normal - 575 V Media Water Water / Water Max. - 633 V Max P across valve 150 psi Closing time @ max P 67 see @ 460 V Other: ( ) Pneumatic ( ) Hydraulic Opening time @ max P 67 sec @ 460 V List functional accessories:* None

  • Functional accessories are those sub-components not supplied by the manufacturer that are required to make the valve assembly operational, (e.g., limit switches, solenoid valves, accumulators, etc).

C3/12177/244/5YH

.c g

-o .

III. FUNCTION

1. Briefly describe components' normal and safety functions (include accident initiating signals).

Normal: Permits isolation of CCP flow from SFC Heat Exchanaer (EIA)

Safety: Same - except when CCP is not available

2. The components normal state is: (X)Dperating ( ) Standby

'3. Safety function:

a. () Emergency reactor b. () Containment heat shutdown removal
c. () Containment isolation d. () Reactor heat removal
e. () Reactor core cooling f. () Prevent significant release of radio-active material to environment 3 '

() Does the component function to mitigate the consequences of one or more of the following events? ( )Yes (X)No

() LOCS () HELB () MSLB (X) Other Removes decay heat from spent fuel pool

4. Safety requirements:

() Intermittent Operation () During postulated event

() Continuous Operation (X) Following postulated event If component operation is required following an event, give approximate length of time component must remain operational 100 days (e.g., hours, days, etc).

5. For VALVES:

Does the component ( ) Fail open ( ) Fail closed (X) Fail as is t

Is this the fail safe position? (X) Yes ( ) No Is the valve used for throttling purposes? ( ) Yes (X) No What is the maximum acceptable internal and external leakrate?

120 cc/hr -

C3/12177/244/5YH 1

r IV. QUALIFICATION

1. Reference by specific number those applicable sections of the design codes and standards applicable to the component: ASME, Sect. III, Class 2 and 3, 1974 ed. w/ add. through Winter '75
2. Reference those qualification standa:cds , used as a guide to qualify the component: IEEE 323-1974, 344-1975, NRC Rea Guides 1.48, 1.61, 1.92, 1.100
3. Have acceptance criteria been established and documented in the test plan (s) for the component?

(X) Yes ( ) No

4. Are the margins
  • identified in the qualification documentation?

(X) Yes ( ) No

    • S. Was the component that was qualified a model or an actual assembly? (see below)** . If a model, what was its scale? . If an actual assembly, was it qualified as an assembly or by sub-assemblies? (i.e.,

valve, actuator, pump, driver) see below**

6. List all component tests performed or to be performed that demonstrate qualification:
1. Static Deflection Test (Valve Assembly Operability Test)
2. Valve Actuator Dynamic Testing and Load Tests
3. Valve Actuator's Motor Tests
4. Hydrostatic Tests - Shell, Wedge, Seat, Backseat and Pack-ing Tests
5. Valve Actuator's Enyt. Testing l
  • Margin is the difference between design basis parameters and the test parameters used for equipment qualification.
    • 0perability Test, Limitorque Actuator - Similar Model for Seismic Loading (Assembly)

Hydrostatic Tests - Actual Assembly (Assembly)

Limitorque Actuator and Motor - Actual Actuator for Motor and Actuator Load Tests (Subassembly) l l C3/12177/244/5YH l

l

r-l

\

1

7. List all component analyses performed that demonstrate ;

qualification: '

Static analysis of valve assembly l t

8. As a result of any of the tests (or analysis), were any deviations from design requirements identified?

(X) Yes. ( ) No If "Yes", briefly describe any changes made in tests (or analyses) or to the component to correct the deviation.

Limit switch screws and bolt torques were adjusted Limit switch finner assembly maps were adjusted

9. Was the tested component precisely identical (as to model, size, etc) to the in-plant component? ( ) Yes (X) No. If "No", is installed component ( ) oversized or ( ) undersized?

Same type but not identical

10. Is component orientation sensitive? (X) Yes ( ) No ( ) Unknown.

If "Yes", does installed orientation coincide with test /

analysis orientation? (X) Yes ( ) No.

List all loads and nuwerical values used during tests or analysis and indicate whether applied individually or in combination:

a. Static analysis - seismic load 5.83 a's acceleration, pressure 720 psi, operating torque 5684 in.-lb, applied in combination
b. Static deflection test - seismic load 11.6 a's, differential pressure 108 psi, applied in combination
c. Limitorque actuator dynamic test - 14.0 a's maximum frasility level
d. Limitorque actuator enyt. test - temperature 250*F pressure 25 psi humidity 100%

radiation 2 x 10' rads samma

e. Hydrostatic testina - shell 425 psi for 10 min.,

wedge 300 psi for 1 min., seat 150 psi for 1 min. ,

backseat 425 psi for 1 min. , packina 300 psi for 2 min.

f. Limitorque motor test - normal 10900 load 460 V max 14400 load 460 V stall 28700 load 572 V C3/12177/244/5YH

7- ,

11. Does the component have a unique design or utilize unique saterials in its construction? (Examples are special gaskets i

{

or packings, one of a kind components, limitations on non-ferrous materials, special coatings or surfaces, etc.) _

( ) Yes (X) No If "Yes" identify:

12. What is the design (qualified) life of the component, exclusive of normal maintenance items such as packings, bearings, seals, diaphrages, gaskets, and other elastomers?

40 Years - Valve 7 Years - Limitorque Actuator

13. Which of the components normal maintenance items requires the most frequent replacement? Gaskets, grease, packing rings What is the normal time interval between replacements of this item?

Based on ISI and Maintenance Programs currently being developed

14. What is the harshest (accident / post-accident) external environment that the component could be exposed to during its qualified life? (e.g., temp., press., humidity, submergence, radiation type and dose, etc.)

50% RH (normal) .25 in/H2O (normal) 2.8 psig (accident) 100% RH (accident) 104'F (normal) 200*F accident 2.0 x los rads gamma 40 yr/ TID (normal) 3.2 x 107 rads gamma 100 day (accident) 1.3 x 107 rads beta 100 day (accident)

No submergence C3/12177/244/5YH

15. Information Concerning Qualification Documents for the Component Company / Company /

Organization Organization Report Preparing Reviewing Number Report-Title Date Report Report Specification 11/30/83 SWEC SWEC/NMPC No. P304R, Rev. 2 Including Addenda 1 through 6 E&DCR Hydrostatic Test 11/2/83 SWEC SWEC P01,895 Clarification E&DCR Seismic Requirements 6/16/83 SWEC SWEC i

P12,356

.0005 Mfr's Drawing 11/23/82 Velan Velan/SWEC

.521.122 8- 16-in. Gate

.039J Valve Bolted Bonnet Forged Motor Operator 12177- Piping Drawing ---

SWEC SWEC EP-72F-7 Closed Loop Cooling Water Piping RB Seismic Analysis 11/23/73 Velan Velan/SWEC Theory Appendix A Revision C SR 6393 Seismic Analysis 10/12/79 Velan Velan/SWEC Rev. O ST-7003 Operability Test 11/2/81 Velan Velan/SWEC Rev. 2 Procedure STRS Operability-Test 3/1/84 Velan Velan/SWEC 05.321 Results at the

.5008B Extremes of Voltage STRS Operability Test 10/12/82 Velan Velan/SWEC 05.321 Results (Lo G)

.5008A .

STRS Operability Test 3/1/84 Velan Velan/SWEC 05.321 Results (Hi G)

.5007B-IEEE Qualification Test ---

Limitorque/ Limitorque/

05.321 Report B0058 Velan Velan/SWEC 5001B

-STRS Actuator Test 8/27/82 Acton/SWEC SWEC 05.321 Report 16573-81N 5000B- Revision 3 C3/12177/244/5YH

Comprny/ Comp:ny/

Organization Organization Report Preparing Reviewing Number Report Title Date Report Report Actuator Test 6/10/82 NTS/SWEC SWEC Report 548-9291 Rev. 2, Volumes I through 3 Testin; of Nuclear 9/19/77 Velan SWEC Valves VEL-NDT-640A (HT)

Revision 8 INST Actuator's Instr. 9/13/82 Limitorque/ Limitorque/

05.321 and Maintenance Velan SWEC

.5000A Manuals INST Valve's Maintenance 12/11/84 Velan SWEC 05.320 Manual VEL-FBBM

.5006C Motor Operator ---

Limitorque/ SWEC Sizing Calc. Velan Valve's Documen- ---

Velan SWEC tation Package W.80004 Electrical Test ---

SWEC SWEC Procedure ED. GENE.014 (Draft)

C3/12177/244/5YH

. . _ . _,_ -_._-_ _ _____. .. -- - - - - - .