|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML17059C7911999-09-30030 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev B to Conversion of Unit 2 Current TS to ITS ML20211P5931999-09-10010 September 1999 Marked-up Tech Specs Pages Reflecting Conforming Administrative License Amend Associated with Proposed Transfer of Facilities to Amergen Energy Co,Llc ML20211H2231999-08-26026 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Supporting Implementation of Noble Metal Chemical by Raising Reactor Water Conductivity Limit in TSs 3.2.3.a,3.2.3.c.1 & 3.2.3.b ML20206P2661998-12-30030 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Making Application of Emergency Condenser Vent Ng Activity Monitor Channel Operability Requirement & Daily Sensor Check SR Consistent with Conditions Stated in LCO 3.1.3.a Re Emergency Cooling Sys ML20197K1041998-12-0404 December 1998 Revised Proposed TS Bases Reflecting Previous Removal of Condenser Low Vacuum Scram Function from TS as Well as Plant Design & Changes to EDG Ratings,Design Basis Load Limits & Loading Profiles ML20196H0671998-11-30030 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting LCO & Associated Bases for TS Section 3.1.2, Liquid Poison Sys, That Had Been Incorporated Into TS as Part of NMP Unit 1 TS Amend 101 ML20196D2081998-11-24024 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs B 2.1.1, Fuel Cladding - Safety Limit, B 3.2.5 & 4.2.5, Reactor Coolant Sys Leakage Rate ML20154R1101998-10-16016 October 1998 Proposed Ts,Revising LCO 3.7.1.1 & Associated Actions & SRs to Provide Assurance That Four SW Pumps Are Operable & Are Operating within Acceptable Sys Parameters,With Divisional Cross Connect Valves Open ML20217N7911998-04-24024 April 1998 Revised Pages 2-1,3/4 4-1 & B2-1 to Replace Previously Submitted Pages Contained within Attachment a of 971215 Proposed Change to TS to License NPF-49 ML20202G3751998-02-0505 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Reflecting References to 10CFR50.55a(f) & (G) as Well as Terminology Used in Second Ten Year Isi/Ist,Beginning on 980405 ML20197H3371997-12-15015 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR from 1.07 to 1.09 for Two Recirculation Loop Operation & from 1.08 to 1.10 for Single Loop Operation ML20211M5231997-10-0707 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Section 4.9.6,reflecting New Setpoints Due to Difference in Weights of Two Existing Triangular Refueling Platform Masts ML20217G9011997-07-31031 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Wording in Action 36 of TS Table 3.3.3-1, Emergency Core Cooling Sys Actuation Instrumentation ML20148A7751997-04-30030 April 1997 Proposed Change to Tech Specs,Removing Section 3.3.7.3 & Associated Surveillance Section 4.3.7.3,associated Tables 3.3.7.3-1 & 4.3.7.3-1,Bases Section 3.4.3.7.3 & Revising Section 0.0 (Index) Pages VII & Xvii ML20116D8121996-07-26026 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Option B of App J to 10CFR50 ML20115H1521996-07-12012 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.2.2.i Re App a ML20117F9501996-05-15015 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.3.2 Re Isolation Actuation Instrumentation ML20101F4281996-03-20020 March 1996 Proposed TS 3/4.3.1 Re RPS Instrumentation,Deleting Operability Requirements for APRM Neutron flux-upscale, Setdown & Inoperative Functions in Operational Conditions (Oc) 3 & 4 & Modifying Operability Requirements in Oc 5 ML20101D7551996-03-15015 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 4.6.2 Re Depressurization Sys - Suppression Pool ML20097D2391996-02-0707 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Controls ML20100C1021996-01-25025 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.3-1 Re Emergency Core Cooling Sys Actuation Instrumentation ML20096G8401996-01-17017 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Representing Revs to Specs 3/4.3.1, 3/4.3.2,3/4.3.3,3/4.3.4.2 & Associated Bases to Relocate Response Time Limit Tables from TSs to Plant USAR ML20094B5421995-10-25025 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Position Title Changes & Reassignments of Responsibilities at Upper Mgt Level ML20091Q9571995-08-28028 August 1995 Proposed TS 3.6.1.7,increasing Time 12-inch & 14-inch Containment Purge Sys Supply & Exhaust Valves May Be Open in Operational Condition 1,2 & 3 from 90 H Per 365 Days to 135 H Per 365 Days & Deleting Expired Footnotes for Clarity ML20081E2491995-03-0909 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising SR 4.6.1.2.a,allowing Second Primary Containment ILRT (Type a) to Be Performed at Refueling Outage 5 or 72 Months After First Type a Test ML20077N1591995-01-0606 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Min Gallons of Fuel Oil Required in Day Tanks & Storage Tanks ML20077N2071995-01-0606 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Deletion of Certain Instruments Not Classified as Category 1 ML20078Q9241994-12-13013 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Change to Table 3.6.1.2-1 That Will Allow Maximum Leakage of 24.0 Scfh for Each of Eight MSIVs ML20077E1561994-12-0202 December 1994 Proposed TS Page 3/4 1-20,reflecting Rev of SLCS Relief Valve Setpoint to Show Influence of Back Pressure & Rev of Bases Page B3/4 5-2 to Show That Hpsc Sys Designed to Supply 517 Gpm Flow Rate at 1,200 (Instead of 1,175) Psid ML20078J3781994-11-14014 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Reducing Leak Rate Test Pressure for Safety Related ADS Nitrogen Receiving Tanks from 385 Psig to 365 Psig ML20078E0331994-10-28028 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs 1.0, Definitions, 3/4.3.2, Isolation Actuation Instrumentation & 3/4.9.3, Control Rod Position ML20078B9841994-10-21021 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs SR 4.8.1.1.2.e.8,reflecting Addition of Footnote Re 24 H Functional Test of DGs ML20073L8781994-10-0505 October 1994 Proposed TS Table 3.3.7.1-1 Re Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation ML20072U3491994-09-0202 September 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re 18 Month Operability Test of Svc Water Pumps Sys & Resistance Test of Intake Deicing Heater Sys ML17059A4471994-09-0101 September 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.2.2, Minimum Reactor Vessel Temperature for Pressurization, & Associated Bases ML20072P6211994-08-26026 August 1994 Proposed TS 3/4.6.1.3, Primary Containment Air Locks, Allowing Continued Plant Operation If Interlock Becomes Inoperable as Long as Operable Door Locked Shut & Periodically Checked as Being Locked Shut ML20071G2771994-07-0101 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Surveillance Requirements 4.6.5.1.c.1 & 4.6.5.1.c.2 ML20029D4001994-04-27027 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Drawdown Time Testing & Inleakage Testing for Secondary Containment Integrity ML20058N3491993-12-14014 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.8.2, DC Sources, 3/4.8.4, Electrical Equipment Protective Devices & Bases for 3/4.6.3, Primary Containment Isolation Valves ML20056G9391993-09-0202 September 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.1.3.5, CR Scram Accumulators ML20056G1951993-08-27027 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 4.8.1.1.2.e, AC Sources - Operating & Adding TS 4.8.1.1.2.f ML20044G6261993-05-26026 May 1993 TS Section 6.8 Re Review & Approval Process for Procedure Changes ML20044F7421993-05-21021 May 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 2-3,3/4 2-2,3/4 3-60,3/4 3-62, 3/4 3-63,3/4 3-64,3/4 3-65 & 6-22 & Bases Page B3/4 2-1 ML20044F3041993-05-19019 May 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 3.4.3.1 & 3.4.3.2 Re Generic Ltr 88-01,drywell Leak Detection Requirements ML17058B7751993-05-14014 May 1993 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Editorial Changes, Administrative Corrections & Retyping of TS ML17056C3281993-03-29029 March 1993 Proposed TS Pages 139 & 140 Re LCO SR for Type a & Local Leak Rate Type B & C Tests ML20012G5441993-02-27027 February 1993 Proposed TS Sections 1.0, Definitions & 3/4.3.6, Control Rod Block Instrumentation. ML17056C2741993-02-18018 February 1993 Proposed TS Table 3.2.7 Re RCS Isolation Valves,Table 3.2.7.1 Re Primary Coolant Sys Pressure Isolation Valves & Table 3.3.4 Re Primary Containment Isolation Valves,Lines Entering Free Space of Containment ML17056C2571993-02-12012 February 1993 Proposed,Revised TS Pages 204,204a,207,225a & 230 to Clarify Operator Actions in Event of Loss of Two Instrument Channels ML20126H9941992-12-30030 December 1992 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.3.1 & 3.4.3.2 Re RCS Leakage Detection Sys & Operational Leakage to Conform W/ Recommendations of Generic Ltr 88-01 1999-09-30
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML17059C7911999-09-30030 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev B to Conversion of Unit 2 Current TS to ITS ML20211P5931999-09-10010 September 1999 Marked-up Tech Specs Pages Reflecting Conforming Administrative License Amend Associated with Proposed Transfer of Facilities to Amergen Energy Co,Llc ML20211H2231999-08-26026 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Supporting Implementation of Noble Metal Chemical by Raising Reactor Water Conductivity Limit in TSs 3.2.3.a,3.2.3.c.1 & 3.2.3.b ML18041A0731999-07-27027 July 1999 Rev 1 to NMP2-ISI-006, Second Ten Year Interval Inservice Insp Program Plan for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station Unit 2. ML20206P2661998-12-30030 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Making Application of Emergency Condenser Vent Ng Activity Monitor Channel Operability Requirement & Daily Sensor Check SR Consistent with Conditions Stated in LCO 3.1.3.a Re Emergency Cooling Sys ML20197K1041998-12-0404 December 1998 Revised Proposed TS Bases Reflecting Previous Removal of Condenser Low Vacuum Scram Function from TS as Well as Plant Design & Changes to EDG Ratings,Design Basis Load Limits & Loading Profiles ML20196H0671998-11-30030 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting LCO & Associated Bases for TS Section 3.1.2, Liquid Poison Sys, That Had Been Incorporated Into TS as Part of NMP Unit 1 TS Amend 101 ML20196D2081998-11-24024 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs B 2.1.1, Fuel Cladding - Safety Limit, B 3.2.5 & 4.2.5, Reactor Coolant Sys Leakage Rate ML20154R1101998-10-16016 October 1998 Proposed Ts,Revising LCO 3.7.1.1 & Associated Actions & SRs to Provide Assurance That Four SW Pumps Are Operable & Are Operating within Acceptable Sys Parameters,With Divisional Cross Connect Valves Open ML20217N7911998-04-24024 April 1998 Revised Pages 2-1,3/4 4-1 & B2-1 to Replace Previously Submitted Pages Contained within Attachment a of 971215 Proposed Change to TS to License NPF-49 ML20202G3751998-02-0505 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Reflecting References to 10CFR50.55a(f) & (G) as Well as Terminology Used in Second Ten Year Isi/Ist,Beginning on 980405 ML20197H3371997-12-15015 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR from 1.07 to 1.09 for Two Recirculation Loop Operation & from 1.08 to 1.10 for Single Loop Operation ML20211M5231997-10-0707 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Section 4.9.6,reflecting New Setpoints Due to Difference in Weights of Two Existing Triangular Refueling Platform Masts ML20217G9011997-07-31031 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Wording in Action 36 of TS Table 3.3.3-1, Emergency Core Cooling Sys Actuation Instrumentation ML20148A7751997-04-30030 April 1997 Proposed Change to Tech Specs,Removing Section 3.3.7.3 & Associated Surveillance Section 4.3.7.3,associated Tables 3.3.7.3-1 & 4.3.7.3-1,Bases Section 3.4.3.7.3 & Revising Section 0.0 (Index) Pages VII & Xvii ML17059B2911996-09-0404 September 1996 NMP Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2,Pump & Valve First Ten-Yr Inservice Testing Program Plan. ML20116D8121996-07-26026 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Option B of App J to 10CFR50 ML20115H1521996-07-12012 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.2.2.i Re App a ML20117F9501996-05-15015 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.3.2 Re Isolation Actuation Instrumentation ML20101F4281996-03-20020 March 1996 Proposed TS 3/4.3.1 Re RPS Instrumentation,Deleting Operability Requirements for APRM Neutron flux-upscale, Setdown & Inoperative Functions in Operational Conditions (Oc) 3 & 4 & Modifying Operability Requirements in Oc 5 ML20101D7551996-03-15015 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 4.6.2 Re Depressurization Sys - Suppression Pool ML20097D2391996-02-0707 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Controls ML20100C1021996-01-25025 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.3-1 Re Emergency Core Cooling Sys Actuation Instrumentation ML20096G8401996-01-17017 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Representing Revs to Specs 3/4.3.1, 3/4.3.2,3/4.3.3,3/4.3.4.2 & Associated Bases to Relocate Response Time Limit Tables from TSs to Plant USAR ML20094B5421995-10-25025 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Position Title Changes & Reassignments of Responsibilities at Upper Mgt Level ML20091Q9571995-08-28028 August 1995 Proposed TS 3.6.1.7,increasing Time 12-inch & 14-inch Containment Purge Sys Supply & Exhaust Valves May Be Open in Operational Condition 1,2 & 3 from 90 H Per 365 Days to 135 H Per 365 Days & Deleting Expired Footnotes for Clarity ML20081E2491995-03-0909 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising SR 4.6.1.2.a,allowing Second Primary Containment ILRT (Type a) to Be Performed at Refueling Outage 5 or 72 Months After First Type a Test ML17059B0221995-02-15015 February 1995 Rev 0 to UT-NMP-311V0, Procedure for Manual Ultrasonic Exam of Nozzles Inner Radius & Bore. ML17059B0211995-02-10010 February 1995 Rev 0 to UT-NMP-309V0, Procedure for Manual Ultrasonic Exam of Planar Flaw Sizing for Nozzle Inner Radius & Bore Regions. ML17059B0201995-02-10010 February 1995 Rev 0 to UT-NMP-703V0, Procedure for Geris 2000 Ultrasonic Exam of RPV Nozzle Inner Radius & Bore Regions. ML17059A8881995-01-18018 January 1995 Rev 0 to Field Disposition Instruction 0245-90800, Shroud. ML20077N1591995-01-0606 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Min Gallons of Fuel Oil Required in Day Tanks & Storage Tanks ML20077N2071995-01-0606 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Deletion of Certain Instruments Not Classified as Category 1 ML20078Q9241994-12-13013 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Change to Table 3.6.1.2-1 That Will Allow Maximum Leakage of 24.0 Scfh for Each of Eight MSIVs ML20077E1561994-12-0202 December 1994 Proposed TS Page 3/4 1-20,reflecting Rev of SLCS Relief Valve Setpoint to Show Influence of Back Pressure & Rev of Bases Page B3/4 5-2 to Show That Hpsc Sys Designed to Supply 517 Gpm Flow Rate at 1,200 (Instead of 1,175) Psid ML20078J3781994-11-14014 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Reducing Leak Rate Test Pressure for Safety Related ADS Nitrogen Receiving Tanks from 385 Psig to 365 Psig ML17059A5661994-11-0909 November 1994 Rev 2 to Emergency Plan Maint Procedure EPMP-EPP-08, Maint, Testing & Operation of Oswego County Prompt Notification Sys. ML20078E0331994-10-28028 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs 1.0, Definitions, 3/4.3.2, Isolation Actuation Instrumentation & 3/4.9.3, Control Rod Position ML20078B9841994-10-21021 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs SR 4.8.1.1.2.e.8,reflecting Addition of Footnote Re 24 H Functional Test of DGs ML20073L8781994-10-0505 October 1994 Proposed TS Table 3.3.7.1-1 Re Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation ML20072U3491994-09-0202 September 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re 18 Month Operability Test of Svc Water Pumps Sys & Resistance Test of Intake Deicing Heater Sys ML17059A4471994-09-0101 September 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.2.2, Minimum Reactor Vessel Temperature for Pressurization, & Associated Bases ML20072P6211994-08-26026 August 1994 Proposed TS 3/4.6.1.3, Primary Containment Air Locks, Allowing Continued Plant Operation If Interlock Becomes Inoperable as Long as Operable Door Locked Shut & Periodically Checked as Being Locked Shut ML17059A4241994-07-0606 July 1994 Rev 14 to Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 1 Odcm. ML20071G2771994-07-0101 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Surveillance Requirements 4.6.5.1.c.1 & 4.6.5.1.c.2 ML20029D4001994-04-27027 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Drawdown Time Testing & Inleakage Testing for Secondary Containment Integrity ML18040A2941993-12-17017 December 1993 Rev 13 to Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 1 Odcm. ML20058N3491993-12-14014 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.8.2, DC Sources, 3/4.8.4, Electrical Equipment Protective Devices & Bases for 3/4.6.3, Primary Containment Isolation Valves ML17059A0971993-10-25025 October 1993 Rev 4 to NMP2-IST-001,NMP,Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2,Pump & Valve First Ten-Yr Inservice Testing Program Plan. ML20056G9391993-09-0202 September 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.1.3.5, CR Scram Accumulators 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
..
ATTACIIMENT A NIAGARA MOIIAWK POWER CORPORATION
, LICENSE NO. NPF-60 l
DOCKE'1 NO. 50-410 l
l Proposed Channt to Tech lical Specifications
' Pages 2-1, 3/4 4-1, and B2-1 have been retyped in their entirety with marginal markings to l
indicate changes. These retyped pages 2-1,3/4 4-1, and B2-1 replace the retyped pages 2-1, 3/4 4-1, and B2-1 contained within Attachment A of NMPC's December 15, 1997 submittal.
j l 1
! i
! 1 i
l 1
1 i
i I
9805050433 990424 PDR ADOCK 05000410 P PDR a 1
.. 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS i
2.1 SAFETY LIMITS THERMAL POWER, Low Pressure or Low Flow i
2.1.1 THERMAL POWER shall not exceed 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER with the i reactor vessel steam dome pressure less than 785 psig or core flow less than 10% of rated l flow. {
l APPLICABILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 and 2. I ACTION:
With THERMAL POWER exceeding 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER and the reactor vessel steam dome pressure less than 785 psig or core flaw less than 10% of rated flow, !
be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and comply with the requirements of I Specification 6.7. j THERMAL POWER. Hiah Pressure and Hiah Flow 2.1.2 The MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR)* shall not be less than 1.09 with l two recirculation loop operation and shall not be less than 1.10 with single recirculation I loop operation with the reactor vessel steam dome pressure greater than 785 psig and core ,
flow greater than 10% of rated flow. j APPLICABILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 and 2.
ACTIOl3:
With MCPR* less than 1.09, with two recirculation loop operation or less than 1.10 with l single loop operation, the reactor vessel steam dome pressure greater than 785 psig, and .
core flow greater than 10% of rated flow, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and comply with the requirements of Specification 6.7.
1' REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE 2.1.3 The reactor coolant system pressure, as measured in the reactor vessel steam dcme, shall not exceed 1325 psig.
APPLICABILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1,2,3, and 4. l ACTION: ,
With the reactor coolant system pressure as measured in the reactor vessel steam dome j above 1325 psig, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN with reactor coolant system pressure :
less than or equal to 1325 psig within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and comply with the requirements of Specification 6.7.
l B_EACTOR VESSEL WATER LEVEL !
t 2.1.4 The reactor vessel water level shall be above the top of the active irradiated fuel.
- MCPR values are applicable to Cycle 7 operation only. l NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 21 Amendment No Id t -
.. /4.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM 3/4.4.1 REClRCULATION SYSTEM 1
RECIRCULATION LOOPS' l l
LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION
- 3.4.1.1 Two reactor coolant system recirculation loops shall be in operation with: l
- a. Total core flow greater than or equal to 45% of rated core flow, or
- b. THERMAL POWER within the unrestricted zone of Figure 3.4.1.1-1.
APPLICABILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1* AND 2*.
ACTION:
- a. With one reactor coolant system recirculation loop not in operation:
- 1. Within four hours:
a) Place the recirculation flow control system in the Loop Manual (Position Control) mode, and b) Reduce THERMAL POWER to $70% of RATED THERMAL POWER, and, c) Increase the MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RA'lO (MCPR)* *
- Safety Limit by 3 0.01 to 1.10 per Specification 2.1.2, and, '
d) Reduce the Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate !
(MAPLHGR) limit per Specification 3.2.1, and, j l
e) Reduce the Average Power Range Monitor (APRM) Scram and Rod Block and l
Rod Block Monitor Trip Setpoints and Allowable Values to those applicable l for single recirculation loop operation per Specifications 2.2.1, 3.2.2 and
{
3.3.6. ;
i f) Reduce the volumetric drive flow rate of the operating recirculation loop to j s41,800*
)
t l *- See SpEcial Test Exception 3.10.4. l 1
- ~ Th,'s value represents the volumetric recirculation loop drive flow which produces 100%
core flow at 100% THERMAL POWER.
1 MCPR values are apphcable to Cycle 7 operation only. l I l
l NINE MILE oOINT - UN T 2 3/4 4-1 Amendment No. [d, //
Goneoted4uly4h4000 l
. 2.1 BASES FOR SAFETY LIMITS i l
2.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The fuel cladding, reactor pressure vessel, and primary system piping are the principal barriers to the release of radioactive materials to the environs. Safety Limits are established to protect the integrity of these barriers during normal plant operations and anticipated transients. The fuel cladc'ing integrity Safety Limit is set so that no fuel damage is calculated to occur if the limit is not violated. Because fuel damage is not directly observable, a step-back approach is used to establish a Safety Limit so that the MCPR* is not less than 1.09 for two recirculation loop operation and 1.10 for single recirculation loop operation. MCPR* greater than 1.09 for two recirculation loop operation and 1.10 for single recirculation loop operation represents a conservative margin relative to the conditions required to maintain fuel cladding integrity. The fuel cladding is one of the physical barriers that separate the radioactive materials from the environs. The integrity of this cladding barrier is related to its relative freedom from perforations or cracking.
Although some corrosion or use-related cracking may occur during the life of the cladding, fission product migration from this source is incrementally cumulative and continuously measurable. Fuel cladding perforations, however, can result from thermal stresses that occur from reactor operation significantly above design conditions and the Limiting Safety System Settings. Although fission product migration from cladding perforation is just as measurable as that from use-related cracking, the thermally caused cladding perforations signal a threshold beyond which still greater thermal stresses may cause gross rather than incremental cladding deterioration. Therefore, the fuel cladding Safety Limit is defined with a margin to the conditions that would produce onset of transition boiling, MCPR of 1.0.
These conditions represent a significant departure from the condition intended by design for planned operation.
2.1.1 THERMAL POWER. Low Pressure or low Flow The use of critical power correlations is not valid for all critical power calculations performed at reduced pressures below 785 psig or core flows less than 10% of rated flow.
Therefore, the fuel cladding integrity Safety Limit is established by other means. This is done by establishing a limiting condition on core THERMAL POWER with the following basis. Since the pressure drop in the bypass region is essentially all elevation head, the core pressure drop at low power and flows will always be greater than 4.5 psi. Analyses show that with a bundle flow of 28 x 103 lb/hr, bundle pressure drop is nearly independent of bundle power and has a value of 3.5 psi. Thus, the bundle flow with a 4.5 psi driving l head will be greater than 28 x 103lb/hr. Full-scale ATLAS test data taken at pressuros from 14.7 psia to 800 psia indicate that the fuel assembly critical power at this flow is approximately 3.35 MWt. With the design peaking factors, this corresponds to a THERMAL POWER of more than 50% of RATED THERMAL POWER. Thus, a THERMAL POWER limit of 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER for reactor pressure below 785 psig is conservative.
l
- MCPR values are applicable to Cycle 7 operation only. l NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 B2-1 Amendment No. /d, dd
t l
ATTACIIMENT B NIAGARA MOIIAWK POWER CORPORATION LICENSE NO. NPF-69 l l
DOCKET .NO. 50-410 1
I Marked-up Cony of Proposed Channe to Current Technical Snecifications The current version of pages 2-1, 3/4 4-1, and B2-1 of the NMP2 Technical Specifications have been hand marked-up to reflect the proposed changes. These marked up pages 2-1,3/4 4-1, and B2-1 replace the previously submitted marked-up pages 2-1, 3/4 4-1, and B2-1 contained within Attachment C of NMPC's December 15,1997 submittal.
J l
l l
]
2.0 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS ,
2.1 . SAFETY LIMITS THERMAL POWER. Low Pressure or low Flow 2.1.1 THERMAL POWER 'shall not exceed 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER with the reactor. vessel steam done pressure less than 785 psig or core flow less than 10% of-rated flow.
APPLICA8ILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 and 2.
ACTION: .
With THERMAL POWER exceeding 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER and the reactor vessel steam done pressure less.than 785 psig or core flow less than 10% of rated flow, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and comply with the require- ,
ments of Specification 6.7. 1 THERMAL POWER, High Pressure and High Flow
. I l.09 2.1.2 TheMINIMUMCRITICALPOWERRATIO(MCPRbg shall not be ' than?-1-W with two recirculation loop operation and shall not be less than with s ngle recirculation loop operation with the reactor vessel steam pressure greater ;
than 785 psig and core flow greater than 10% of rated flow, i APPLICABILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 and 2.
ACTION:
Sith_MCP ess than with two recirculation loop operation or less than h feGEi/with single loop operation, the reactor vessel steam done pressure greater ,
than 785 psig, and core flow greater than 10% of rated flow, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and comply with the requirements of Specification 6.7.
3EACTORCOOLANTSYSTEMPRESSURE 2.1.3 The reactor coolant system pressure, as measured in the reactor vessel steam done,'shall not exceed 1325 psig.
APPLICABILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1, 2, 3, and 4.
ACTION:
With the reactor coolant system pressure as measured in the reactor vessel steam done above 1325 psig, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN with reactor coolant system pressure less than or equal to 1325 psig within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and cosply with the requirements of Specification 6.7.
REACTOR VESSEL WATER LEVEL 2.1.4 The reactor vessel water level shall be above the top of the active irradiated fuel.
- Meht values are a plic46/s. -h Cycle 7 o en4ien enly .
NINE MILE P0 INT - UNIT 2 2-1 Amendment No. g
.. - I
'l; l
t 3/4.'4 REA'CTOR COOLANT SYSTEM i 3/4.4.1 RECIRCULATION' SYSTEM
-RECIRCULATION LOOM i
LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION 3.4.1.1- Two reactor. coolant system recirculation loops shall be in operation with:
- a. Total core flow greater than'or equal to 45% of rated core flow, or- !
- b. THERMAL' POWER within the' unrestricted zone of Figure 3.4.1.1-1. I APPLICA8ILITY: OPERATIONAL' CONDITIONS 1* and 2*. !
~
ACTION:
- a. With one reactor coolant system recirculation loop not in operation:
- 1. Within four hours:. I a) Place the recirculation flow control system in the Loop i Manual'(Position Control) mode, and '
b) Reduce THERMAL POWER to_1 70% of RATED THERMAL POWER, and, c) . Increase the MINI ICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR)fSafety Limit'by 0.01 to per Specification 2.1.2, and, 1.1 d) Reduce the Maximum erage Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate 7
_(MAPLHGR) limit per Specification 3.2.1, and, f V_
e) Reduce the Average Power Range Monitor (APRM). Scram and Rod
' Block-and Rod Block Monitor Trip Setpoints'and Allowable Values
.to'those applicable for single recirculation loop operation per
. Specifications 2.2.1, 3.2.2 and 3.3.6.
f). Reduce the volumetric drive flow rate of the operating recirculation' loop to's 41,800**:gpe.
- See Special-Test Exception 3.10.4.
- This value represents the volumetric recirculation loop drive flow which
. produces 1 05 core flow at 100% THERMAL POWER.
^ ^ ^ i; .. _ ....., . ..-.. ., ..., . ... .,. ...; tr.r;.;t tt; "' :t :;:::tk.;-
cye?:.
%%%. McPC values are ay(IIcable. % Cyele. 7 - ~oftra% onIy.
NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 3/4 4-1 AmendmentNo.16,//
Ci.,iiai.ed My C, 1 ;;0
l
.' l
'2.1 BASES FOR SAFETY LIMITS _]
2.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The fuel cladding, reactor pressure vessel, and primary system piping are the principal barriers to the release of radioactive materials to the environs. Safety Limits are l established to protect the integrity of these barriers during normal plant operations and . '
y an!.icipated transients. The fuel cladding integrity Safety Limit is set so that no fuel damage is calculated to' occur if the limit is not violated. Because fuel damage is not -
directly observable, a ek approach is used to establish a Safety Lmit so that the_
l.M WCPR"is not less tha _ for tw ecirculation operation andWMNor single 7.70
~ recirculation 1.000 operation! MCP rester than for two recirculaTson loop /,ay peration an or single recirculation loop opedtibn represents a conservativ margin relati@ve to the conditions required to maintain fuel cladding integrity. T cladding is one of the physical barriers that separate the radioactive materials from the environs. The integrity of this cladding' barrier is related to its relative freedom from perforations or cracking. Although some corrosion or use-related cracking may occur during the life of the cladding, fission product migration from this source is incrementally cumulative and continuously measurable. Fuel cladding perforations, however, can result from thermal stresses that occur from reactor operation significantly above design conditions and the Limiting Safety System Settings. Although fission product migration from cladding perforation is just as measurable as that from use-related cracking, the thermally caused cladding perforations signal a threshold beyond which still greater thermal stresses may cause gross rather than incremental cladding deterioration. Therefore, the fuel cladding Safety Limit is defined with a margin to the conditions that would produce onset of transition boiling, MCPR of 1.0. These conditions represent a significant departure from the condition intended by design for planned operation.
2.1.1 THERMAL POWER. Low Pressure or Low Flow The use of critical power correlations is not valid for all critical power calculations N i performed at reduced pressures below 785 psig or core flows less than 10% of rated i flow. Therefore, the fuel cladding integrity Safety Limit is established by other means. v This is done by establishing a limiting condition on core THERMAL POWER with the ;
following basis. Since the pressure drop in the bypass region is essentially all elevation I head, the core pressure drop at low power and flows will always be greater than 4.5 psi. Analyses show that with a bundle flow of 28 x 10' lb/hr, bundle pressure drop is nearly independent of bundle power and has a value of 3.5 psi. Thus, the bundle flow ,
with a 4.5fpsi driving head will be greater than 28 x 108 lb/hr. Full scale ATLAS test l
data taken at pressures from 14.7 psia to 800 psia indicate that the fuel assembly critical power at this flow is approximately 3.35 MWt. With the design peaking factors, this corresponds to a THERMAL POWER of more than 50% of RATED THERMAL POWER. Thus, a THERMAL POWER limit of 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER for reactor pressure below 785 psig is conservative.
M Mcf& valuu are ay Mble. I 40 Cye.it. 7 N. y NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 B2-1 Amendment No. 34 /J(