|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20211E7151999-08-20020 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Many Generic Improvements Agreed Upon Between Industry & NRC Since GGNS Conversion to ITS ML20196K0831999-06-29029 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Page 3.4-3,reflecting Implementation of BWROG Enhanced Option I-A,reactor Stability long-term Solution ML20196G7131999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising TS Associated with Various Esfss Which Need No Longer Be Credited Following Design Basis Fuel Handling Accident ML20206K5361999-05-0606 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Changing SLMCPR ML20206R9351999-01-12012 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Refueling Equipment Interlocks Required Actions ML20154Q4511998-10-16016 October 1998 TS Bases Update for Period of 970410 Through 981015 ML20236T1661998-07-20020 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.2.4,3.3.1.1,3.3.1.3,3.4.1,5.6.5, B 3.2.4,B 3.3.1.1,B 3.3.1.3 & B 3.4.1,enabling Full Implementation of Enhanced Option I-A Long Term Solution to Address Neutronic/Thermal Hydraulic Instability Issue ML20198J3581998-01-0909 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Certain Clarifications to Amend & Adding Restriction to Allowed Interval Extensoions ML20198N3941997-10-28028 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Implementing Option B & Ref SE Issued by NRR for Ggns'S App J Exemption as Implementing Document for performance-based Leakage Testing Program ML20211M8481997-10-0606 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Replacement Bases Pages Associated W/Proposed Amend to License Re Response Time Testing ML20210V5581997-09-18018 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Decrease of Two Recirculation Loop SLMCPR Limit to 1.11 & Single Recirculation Loop SLMCPR Limit to 1.12 ML20210H0871997-08-0606 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Changing TS 3.8.1, AC Sources Operating. Removal of Accelerated Testing Requirements for Standby DGs as Advised by GL 94-01 ML20141A1681997-05-0707 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Eliminating Selected Response Time Testing Requirements ML20140E3211997-04-18018 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS Bases to Include Changes Made Since Rev 1 Was Sent to NRC 960201 ML20134N7841996-11-21021 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Pp 5.0-20 & 5.0-21,revised by Adding Footnote Indicating Proposed Change Applicable Only for Cycle 9 ML20134N7611996-11-20020 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re MCPR Limits for Two Recirculation Loop Operation ML20134E1261996-10-22022 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising TS Figure 3.4.11-1, Minimum Reactor Vessel Metal Temperature Vs Reactor Vessel Procedure, Curves Using Methodology of NRC Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2, Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Matls ML20128M5681996-10-0909 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.8.1.14 Re Surveillance Requirements ML20117P4461996-09-19019 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Containment Purge Valves W/Resilient Seals on Performance Based Leakage Testing Frequency ML20117M7021996-09-0505 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Min Critical Power Safety Limit ML20117G6781996-08-27027 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Surveillance Requirements for Safety/Relief Valves ML20116F0211996-07-31031 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Required to Support Cycle 9,reload 8 ML20113B7381996-06-20020 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Redefining Secondary Containment Boundary to Allow Encl Bldg to Be Inoperable During Upcoming Refueling Outage ML20117L2581996-06-0404 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Replacement Page for Ltr RBG-42764, Proposed Tech Specs 3.9.1 Re Refueling Equipment Interlocks1996-05-31031 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.9.1 Re Refueling Equipment Interlocks ML20117F4661996-05-0909 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying SRV Surveillance Test for Relief Mode of Operation ML20117D6941996-05-0909 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Required to Support Unit 1 Cycle 9, Including Changes to SLMCPR & Ref for Analytical Methods Used to Determine Core Operating Limits.Addl Methodology Ref in Various TS Bases Revised to Reflect GE Methodologies ML20111B2701996-05-0808 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Placing Containment Purge Valves W/ Resilient Seals on Performance Based Leakage Testing Frequency ML20108E3591996-05-0606 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Change in Co Name from Mississipi Power & Light to Entergy Mississippi,Inc ML20107E4681996-04-18018 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Fuel Loading W/Control Rods Withdrawn or Removed from Defueled Core Cells ML20100J8391996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Safety Setpoint Tolerance Requirements for Safety/Relief Valves ML20097C3541996-02-0101 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS Bases to Include Changes Since 950221 Approval of TS Bases ML20094M8001995-11-20020 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Drywell Leak Rate Testing Requirements ML20087B5061995-08-0404 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Assoc W/Various ESF Sys Following Design Basis Fuel Handling Accident ML20082K3451995-04-13013 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Change to Be Reduced to Leave in TS Requirement to Test Outboard MSIV LCS Blowers ML20078S5141995-02-14014 February 1995 Proposed TS Consisting of Changes to SR 4.4.1.4.a.1 & 4.6.1.4.a.2 ML20078N6611995-02-10010 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Supporting Performance of Drywell Bypass Leakage Rate Surveillance on Performance Based Interval ML20079B4501994-11-0909 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Associated W/Various ESF Systems Following Design Basis Fuel Handling Accident ML20070C9751994-06-24024 June 1994 Proposed TS Pages 3/4 6-4 & 3/4 6-6 Associated W/Proposed Exemption to 10CFR50,App J ML20065L4971994-04-15015 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Controls ML20059H6061994-01-13013 January 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Removing 2,324 Spent Fuel Pool Storage Limit ML20058D3911993-11-23023 November 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Pages Re Cycle 7 Reload ML20059A4871993-10-22022 October 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Testing Frequencies for Drywell Test & Airlock Tests ML20059B0351993-10-15015 October 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Converting Current GGNS TS to TS Based Largely on NUREG-1434,Rev 0 ML20057C7281993-09-23023 September 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Removing Surveillance Requirement 4.4.1.2.2 Due to Problems Encountered W/Jet Pump Differential Pressure Instrumentation Measurements ML20056E4511993-08-12012 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4 6-3,6-4,6-4a,6-6,6-12 Re Exemption to 10CFR50,App J, Primary Reactor Containment..., for Local Leak Rate ML20056D5621993-08-11011 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.3.7.5 Reflecting Relocation of Certain Accident Monitoring Instrumentation to Administrative Control ML20046D2081993-08-11011 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.3.7.10, Loose Part Detection Sys, Relocating Loose Part Detection Instrumentation from TS to Administrative Control ML20046D1961993-08-11011 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Supporting Compliance W/New Requirements of 10CFR20 & 10CFR50.36a ML20056C7141993-07-15015 July 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Removing Operability Requirements for auto-test Feature of Load Shedding & Sequencing Sys & Increase AOT for Inoperable Load Shedding & Sequencing Sys from Eight to Twelve 1999-08-20
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20211E7151999-08-20020 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Many Generic Improvements Agreed Upon Between Industry & NRC Since GGNS Conversion to ITS ML20196K0831999-06-29029 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Page 3.4-3,reflecting Implementation of BWROG Enhanced Option I-A,reactor Stability long-term Solution ML20196G7131999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising TS Associated with Various Esfss Which Need No Longer Be Credited Following Design Basis Fuel Handling Accident ML20206K5361999-05-0606 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Changing SLMCPR ML20206R9351999-01-12012 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Refueling Equipment Interlocks Required Actions ML20154Q4511998-10-16016 October 1998 TS Bases Update for Period of 970410 Through 981015 ML20236T1661998-07-20020 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.2.4,3.3.1.1,3.3.1.3,3.4.1,5.6.5, B 3.2.4,B 3.3.1.1,B 3.3.1.3 & B 3.4.1,enabling Full Implementation of Enhanced Option I-A Long Term Solution to Address Neutronic/Thermal Hydraulic Instability Issue ML20198J3581998-01-0909 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Certain Clarifications to Amend & Adding Restriction to Allowed Interval Extensoions ML20210F6651997-12-22022 December 1997 Redeacted Version of Test Rept M-J5.08-Q1-45161-0-8.0-1-0, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding Test Program on Two Gate Valves with Limitorque Actuators for Entergy Operations ML20217H6211997-12-15015 December 1997 Rev 21 to Odcm ML20199L5711997-11-26026 November 1997 Rev 8 to Program Plan GGNS-M-189.1, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Pump & Valve IST Program - Safety Related ML20198N3231997-11-0606 November 1997 Rev 11 to GGNS-M-489.1, Program Plan for ASME Section XI ISI Plan ML20198N3941997-10-28028 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Implementing Option B & Ref SE Issued by NRR for Ggns'S App J Exemption as Implementing Document for performance-based Leakage Testing Program ML20211M8481997-10-0606 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Replacement Bases Pages Associated W/Proposed Amend to License Re Response Time Testing ML20210V5581997-09-18018 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Decrease of Two Recirculation Loop SLMCPR Limit to 1.11 & Single Recirculation Loop SLMCPR Limit to 1.12 ML20210H0871997-08-0606 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Changing TS 3.8.1, AC Sources Operating. Removal of Accelerated Testing Requirements for Standby DGs as Advised by GL 94-01 ML20141A1681997-05-0707 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Eliminating Selected Response Time Testing Requirements ML20140E3211997-04-18018 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS Bases to Include Changes Made Since Rev 1 Was Sent to NRC 960201 ML20134N7841996-11-21021 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Pp 5.0-20 & 5.0-21,revised by Adding Footnote Indicating Proposed Change Applicable Only for Cycle 9 ML20134N7611996-11-20020 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re MCPR Limits for Two Recirculation Loop Operation ML20134E1261996-10-22022 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising TS Figure 3.4.11-1, Minimum Reactor Vessel Metal Temperature Vs Reactor Vessel Procedure, Curves Using Methodology of NRC Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2, Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Matls ML20128M5681996-10-0909 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.8.1.14 Re Surveillance Requirements ML20117P4461996-09-19019 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Containment Purge Valves W/Resilient Seals on Performance Based Leakage Testing Frequency ML20117M7021996-09-0505 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Min Critical Power Safety Limit ML20117G6781996-08-27027 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Surveillance Requirements for Safety/Relief Valves ML20116F0211996-07-31031 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Required to Support Cycle 9,reload 8 ML20113B7381996-06-20020 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Redefining Secondary Containment Boundary to Allow Encl Bldg to Be Inoperable During Upcoming Refueling Outage ML20117L2581996-06-0404 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Replacement Page for Ltr RBG-42764, Proposed Tech Specs 3.9.1 Re Refueling Equipment Interlocks1996-05-31031 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.9.1 Re Refueling Equipment Interlocks ML20117D6941996-05-0909 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Required to Support Unit 1 Cycle 9, Including Changes to SLMCPR & Ref for Analytical Methods Used to Determine Core Operating Limits.Addl Methodology Ref in Various TS Bases Revised to Reflect GE Methodologies ML20117F4661996-05-0909 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying SRV Surveillance Test for Relief Mode of Operation ML20111B2701996-05-0808 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Placing Containment Purge Valves W/ Resilient Seals on Performance Based Leakage Testing Frequency ML20108E3591996-05-0606 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Change in Co Name from Mississipi Power & Light to Entergy Mississippi,Inc ML20107E4681996-04-18018 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Fuel Loading W/Control Rods Withdrawn or Removed from Defueled Core Cells ML20100J8391996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Safety Setpoint Tolerance Requirements for Safety/Relief Valves ML20097C3541996-02-0101 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS Bases to Include Changes Since 950221 Approval of TS Bases ML20094M8001995-11-20020 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Drywell Leak Rate Testing Requirements ML20087B5061995-08-0404 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Assoc W/Various ESF Sys Following Design Basis Fuel Handling Accident ML20082K3451995-04-13013 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Change to Be Reduced to Leave in TS Requirement to Test Outboard MSIV LCS Blowers ML20108A2691995-03-10010 March 1995 Rev 17 to ODCM ML20078S5141995-02-14014 February 1995 Proposed TS Consisting of Changes to SR 4.4.1.4.a.1 & 4.6.1.4.a.2 ML20078N6611995-02-10010 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Supporting Performance of Drywell Bypass Leakage Rate Surveillance on Performance Based Interval ML20079B4501994-11-0909 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Associated W/Various ESF Systems Following Design Basis Fuel Handling Accident ML20070C9751994-06-24024 June 1994 Proposed TS Pages 3/4 6-4 & 3/4 6-6 Associated W/Proposed Exemption to 10CFR50,App J ML20065L4971994-04-15015 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Controls ML20059H6101994-01-14014 January 1994 Cycle 7 Startup Physics Test Summary Rept for Physics Testing Completed on 931220 ML20059H6061994-01-13013 January 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Removing 2,324 Spent Fuel Pool Storage Limit ML20029D6451993-11-30030 November 1993 Reactor Containment Bldg 1993 Integrated Leakage Rate Test. ML20058D3911993-11-23023 November 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Pages Re Cycle 7 Reload ML20059A4871993-10-22022 October 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Testing Frequencies for Drywell Test & Airlock Tests 1999-08-20
[Table view] |
Text
. - - . . . . - - - - _ . - . . _ . - . .
'~
Attachment 3 to GNRO-96/00100
~
< Total 2 pages including this page J
b Replacement Page of the Affected Technical Specifications 4
4 l
4 I
l i
1 9609170612 960905 PDR ADOCK 05000416 P PDR i
= - . . - ~ - . - - . - - . . - - . .- ..- - - - .- --- -
l
. Reporting Requirements 5.6
- 5.6 Reporting Requirements 5.6.5 Core Operatina limits Report (COLR) (continued)
, 10. XN-NF-85-74(P)(A), "RODEX2A (BWR): Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Response Evaluation Model," Exxon Nuclear j- Company, Inc., Richland, WA.
- 11. XN-CC-33(P)(A), "HUXY: A Generalized Multirod Heatup Code g with 10CFR50 Appendix K Heatup Option," Exxon Nuclear g( ,, Company, Inc., Richland, WA.
$k '
- 12. XN-NF-825(P)(A), "BWR/6 Generic Rod Withdrawal Error jg 3
4 E
Analysis, MCPR, for Plant Operation Within the Extended Operating Domain," Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc., Richland, i
j .5 y g6 y WA.
l'51.a5 ;$ 13. XN-NF-81-51(P)(A), "LOCA-Seismic Structural Response of j]T x j an Exxon Nuclear Company BWR Jet Pump Fuel Assembly,"
E s[ f!
e Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc., Richland, WA. .
<a { 14. XN-NF-84-97(P)(A), "LOCA-Seismic Structural Response of
]j j5 u an ENC 9x9 BWR Jet Pump Fuel Assembly," Advanced Nuclear E Fuels Corporation, Richland, WA.
m G 1 j33 .
1
- 15. XN-NF-86-37(P), " Generic LOCA Break Spectrum Analysis for !
g BWR/6 Plants," Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc., Richland, WA.
[ B h :j 16. XN-NF-82-07(P)(A), " Exxon Nuclear Company ECCS Cladding D
8 g Swelling and Rupture Model," Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc:,
Richland, WA.
$(y o 8-h 3
s4 17. XN-NF-80-19(A), Volumes 2, 2A, 2B, & 2C, " Exxon Nuclear-As s a
Ji 2 Methodclogy for Boiling Water Reactors EXEM BWR ECCS I y
1 l552 tzlld Ei Evaluation Model," Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc., Richland, WA.
l Ls ~
s J 18. XN-NF-79-59(P)(A), " Methodology for Calculation for Pressure Drop in BWR Fuel Assemblies," Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc., Richland, WA.- .
- c. The core operating limits shall be determined such that all applicable limits (e.g., fuel thermal mechanical limits, core thermal hydraulic limits, Emergency Core Cooling i Systems (ECCS) limits, nuclear limits such as SDM, transient l analysis limits, and accident analysis limits) of the safety :
analysis are met.
I (continued)
GRAND GULF 5.0-20 Amendment No. 120
Attachment 4 to GNRO-96/00100
, Total 4 pages including this page i
J 1
i General Electric Affidavit to Support Withholding Information
).
l l
1
m GENuclearEnergy GeneralBeetnc Company P 0. Son 180, H6lmmgton, NC 28402 Affidavit I, Ralph J. Reds, being duly sworn, depose and state as follows:
- (1) I am Manager, Fuels and Facility Licensing, General Electric Company ("GE") and have been delegated the function of reviewing the information described in paragraph (2) which is sought to be withheld, and have been authorized to apply for its withholding.
(2) The information sought to be withheld is contained in the document Responses to NRC Requestfor AdditionalInformation (RAI) regarding GGNS Proposed Amendment to the Operating Limit, dated August 30,1996, and is indicated by " brackets" drawn in the margin of the text.
(3) In making this application for withholding of proprietary information of which it is the owner, GE relies upon the exemption from disclosure set forth in the Freedom of
. Information Act ("FOIA"),5 USC Sec'. 552(b)(4), and the Trade Secrets Act,18 USC Sec.
1905, and NRC regulations 10 CFR 9.17(a)(4) and 2.790(a)(4) for " trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential" (Exemption 4). The material for which exemption from disclosure is here sought is all ,
" confidential commercial information," and some portions also qualify under the narrower definition of" trade secret," within the meanings assigned to those terms for purposes of FOIA Exemption 4 in, respectively, Critical Macc Energy Proiect v. Nuclear Regulatorv l Commission 975F2d871 (DC Cir.1992), and Public Citi7en Health Research Groun v. !
EDA,704F2d1280 (DC Cir.1983). l (4) Some examples of categories ofinformation which fit into the definition of proprietary - ;
information are.
- a. Information that discloses a process, method, or apparatus, including.
supporting data and analyses, where prevention of its use by General Electric's competitors without license from General Electric constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies;
- b. Information which, if used by a competitor, would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product;
- c. . Information which reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of General Electric, its customers, or -
its suppliers;
- d. Information which reveals aspects of past, present, or future General Electric -)
customer-funded development plans and programs, of potential commercial .
value to General Electric; I
I '. - :
l' AWidevit
- e. Information which discloses patentable subject matter for which it may be desirable to obtain patent protection.
- f. - The information sought to be withheld is considered to be proprietary for the reasons set forth in both paragraphs (4)a. and (4)b., above.
(5) The information sought to be withheld is being submitted to NRC in confidence. The information is of a sort customarily held in confidence by GE, and is in fact so held. Its initial designation as proprietary information, and the subsequent steps taken to prevent its unauthorized disclosure, are as set forth in (6) and (7) following. The information sought to be withheld has, to the best of my knowledge and belief, consistently been held in confidence by GE, no public disclosure has been made, and it is not available in public sources. All disclosures to third parties including any required transmittals to NRC, have
' been made, or must be made, pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements which provide for maintenance of the information in confidence.
(6) Initial approval of proprietary treatment of a document is made by the manager of the originating component, the person most likely to be acquainted with the value and sensitivity
- of the information in relation to industry knowledge. Access to such documents within GE is limited on a "need to know" basis.
(7) The procedure for approval of external release of such a document typically requires review by the staff manager, project manager, principal scientist or other equivalent authority, by the manager of the cognizant marketing function (or his delegate), and by the Legal .
Operation, for technical content, competitive effect, and determination of the accuracy of the proprietary designation. Disclosures outside GE ere limited to regulatory bodies, custo ners, and potential customers, and their agents, suppliers, and licensees, and others with a legitimate need for the information, and then only in accordance with appropriate regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements.
(8) The information identified in paragraph (2) is classified as proprietary because it contains details of GE's Safety Limit MCPR analysis and the corresponding results which GE has applied to GGNS's actual core design with GE's Gell fuel.
The development of the methods used in these analysis, along with the testing, development and approval of the supporting critical power correlation was achieved at a significant cost, on the order of several million dollars, to GE.
(9) Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to GE's competitive position and foreclose or reduce the availability of profit-making opportunities. The fuel design is part of GE's comprehensive BWR safety and technology base, and its commercial value extends beyond the original development cost. The value of -
the technology base goes beyond the extensive physical database and analytical methodology and includes development of the expertise to determine and apply the appropriate evaluation process. In addition, the technology base includes the value derived from providing analyses done with NRC-approved methods.
Page 2
T....
- i AWidevit l
t
. The research, development, engineering, analytical, and NRC review costs comprise a - l substantial investment of time and money by GE. '
The precise value of the expertise to devise an evaluation process and apply the correct analytical methodology is difficult to quantify, but it clearly is substantial.
GE's competitive advantage will be lost ifits competitors are able to use the results of the GE experience to normalize or verify their own process or if they are able to claim an i equivalent underttanding by demonstrating that they can arrive at the same or similar .
conclusso.is.
The value of this information to GE would be lost if the information were disclosed to the public. Making such information available to competitors without their having been required to undertake a similar expenditure of resources would unfairly provide competitors with a windfall, and deprive GE of the opportunity to exercise its competitive advantage to seek an adequate return on its large investment in developing these very valuable analytical tools. I 1
State ofNorth Carolina ) SS:
County of New Hanover )
Ralph J. Reda, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
That he has read the foregoing affidavit and the matters stated therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief.
Executed at Wilmington, North Carolina, this D ay of $4.5k .19 74 ;
l i
l Ra ph J. Reda General Electric Company I
Subscribed and sworn before me this de day of dem/ ,19 0 e 71f, h4u d i
No ry Public, State of North Caroi...a My commission expires /0/0//M
/ /
Page 3