ML20083E200
| ML20083E200 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1983 |
| From: | NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18038A616 | List: |
| References | |
| ENVR-831231, NUDOCS 8312280516 | |
| Download: ML20083E200 (123) | |
Text
.- - -_ . .
O ENVIROXyp%YA[
b R T DN ATING LICENSE STAGE NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION - UNIT 2 g
o, hih ll$i!hhhi ll l di
' .r-~L /
nnd Mu!Ill!Illilililillilll!ii!!ilittle""""L"12""
- s
/$ /)pg
~\ V MDA@ ARA 1 V V@MAWE
, SUPPLEMENT 5 \M
~
- O -
!!g22ggg;6,gggg;,
l C PDR
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 NIAGARA M0 HAWK POWER CORPORATION ER-OLS SUPPLEMENT RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I acknowledge receipt of: Supplement 5 My copy has been updated, and superseded pages have been removed and destroyed. Set Reassignment and/or Set Holder Change of Address (if necessary) Please reassign this manual to, and/or change my address as follows: Please furnish all requested information and return to: A. L. Monahan Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation 3 Executive Campus P.O. Box 5200 Cherry Hill, NJ 08034 Name of set holder Set No. Company Signature Date O C2/1217718/2/2RH
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS INSERTION INSTRUCTIONS The following instructions are for the insertion of the current Supple-ment into the Unit 2 ER-OLS. Remove pages, tables, and/or figures listed in the REMOVE column and replace them with the pages, tables, and/or figures listed in the INSERT column. Dashes (---) in either column indicate no action required. Vertical bars have been placed in the margins of inserted pages and tables to indicate revision locations. O
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS INSERTION INSTRUCTIONS lf VOLUME 1 Remove Insert 2-iii/2-iv 2-iii/2-iv 2-vii/2-viii 2-vii/2-viii 2-ix/2-x 2-ix/2-x 2-xiii/2-xiv 2-xiii/2-xiv Figure 2.1-3 Figure 2.1-3 2.2-3/2.2-4 2.2-3/2.2-4 2.5-1/2.5-2 2.5-1/2.5-2 2.5-3/2.5-4 2.5-3/2.5-4 2.5-4a/2.5-4b 2.5-5/2.5-6 2.5-5/2.5-6 2.5-6a/2.5-6b 2.5-11/2.5-12 2.5-11/2.5-12 2.5-13/--- Table 2.5-1 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-1 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-2 (Sb 1 of 1) Table 2.5-2 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-3 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-3 Table 2.5-4 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-4 Table 2.5-5 (Lh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-5 Table 2.5-6 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-6 Table 2.5-7 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-7 Table 2.5-8 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-8 Table 2.5-9 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-9 Table 2.5-10 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-10 Table 2.5-11 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-11 Table 2.5-12 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-12 Table 2.5-13 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-13 Table 2.5-14 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-14 Table 2.5-15 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-15 Table 2.5-16 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 2.5-16 Figure 2.5-1 Figure 2.5-1 Figure 2.5-2 Figure 2.5-2 Figure 2.5-3 Figure 2.5-3 Figure 2.5-4 Figure 2.5-4 Figure 2.5-5 Figure 2.5-5 Figure 2.5-6 Figure 2.5-6 Figure 2.5-7 ~ Figure 2.5-7 Figure 2.5-8 Figure 2.5-8 Figure 2.5-9 Figure 2.5-9 Figure 2.5-10 Figure 2.5-10 Supplement 5 EII-2 December 1983 I l l
4 1 j Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS ll l 1 INSERTION INSTRUCTIONS , VOLUME I (Cont) i ' i Remove Insert i l Figure 2.5-11 Figure 2.5-11 4 Figure 2.5-12 Figure 2.5-12 - ! Figure 2.5-13 Figure 2.5-13 l Figure 2.5-14 Figure 2,5-14 i Figure 2.5-15 Figure 2.5-15 f i Figure 2.5-16 Figure 2.5-16 Figure 2.5-17 Figure 2.5-17 ) I i d i i i I ; l i i t l , t i l i l t i I I
,t r
i L i Supplement 5 EII-3 December 1983 i l l l I I. ! l [.,--..,,v--,,--,---n--,--,nn. , . _ . .----_w-- _ .- . - . . - - - .
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS INSERTION INSTRUCTIONS VOLUME 2 Remove Insert 3-vii/--- 3-vii/--- 3.5-1/3.5-2 3.5-1/3.5-la 3.5-1b/3.5-2 T3.5-6 (Sh 1 of 1) T3.5-6 (Sh 1 of 1) 3.7-1/3.7-2 3.7-1/3.7-2 3.7-3/3.7-4 3.7-3/3.7-4 Figure 3.7-3 Figure 3.7-3 O S,, _.t Eu-4 0.c . , 1,e3 e
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS () INSERTION INSTRUCTIONS VOLUME 3 Remove Insert 7C-i/7C-il 7C-i/7C-il 7C-1/7C-2 7C-1/7C-2 Table 7C-1 (Sh I of 1) Table 7C-1 (Sh 1 and Sh 2 of 2) Table 7C-2 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-2 (Sh I and Sh 2 of 2) Table 7C-3 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-3 (Sh I and Sh 2 of 2) Table 7C-4 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-4 (Sh I and Sh 2 of 2) Table 7C-5 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-5 (Sh 1 and Sh 2 of 2) Table 7C-6 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-6 (Sh I and Sh 2 of 2) Table 7C-7 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-7 (Sh 1 and Sh 2 of 2) Table 7C-8 (Sh I of 1) Table 7C-8 (Sh 1 and Sh 2 of 2) Table 7C-9 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-9 (Sh 1 and Sh 2 of 2) Table 7C-10 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-10 Table 7C-11 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-11 Table 7C-12 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-12 Table 7C-13 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-13 Table 7C-14 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-14 Table 7C-15 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-15 Table 7C-16 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-16 Table 7C-17 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-17 Table 7C-18 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-18 Table 7C-19 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-19 Table 7C-20 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-20 Table 7C-21 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-21 Table 7C-22 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-22 Table 7C-23 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-23 Table 7C-24 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-24 Table 7C-25 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-25 Table 7C-26 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-26 Table 7C-27 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-27 Table 7C-28 (Sh 1 of 1) Table 7C-28 Figure 7C-1 Figure 7C-1 Figure 7C-2 Figure 7C-2 O Supplement 5 EII-5 December 1983
)
Nine Mile Point l'ait 2 ER-OLS INSERTION INSTRUCTIONS QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES VOLUME Remove Insert EQR-i/EQR-ii EQR-1/EQR-ii Q&R E240.1-1 Q&R E240.1-1 Q&R E240.4-1 Q&R E240.4-1 Q&R E451.18-1 Q&R E451.18-1 Q&R E460.25-1 Q&R E460.25-1 O Supplement 5 EII-6 December 1983
l Nina Milo Point Unit 2 ER-OLS
/ i CHAPTER 2 LJ TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT)
Section Title Page 2.4.2.1.4 Ichthyoplankton 2.4-25 2.4.2.1.5 Benthic Organisms 2.4-27 2.4.2.1.6 Fish 2.4-29 2.4.2.2 Transmission Corridors and Offsite Areas 2.4-35 2.4.3 References 2.4-38 2.5 SOCIOECONOMICS 2.5-1 2.5.1 Demography 2.5-1 2.5.1.1 Population Within 20 Km (12.4 Mi) 2.5-1 2.5.1.2 Population Between 20 and 80 Km (12.4 and 50 Mi) 2.5-3 2.5.2 Community Characteristics of Region 2.5-4 2.5.2.1 Employment and Economic Base 2.5-4 2.5.2.2 Taxation 2.5-5 2.5.2.3 Zoning 2.5-5 2.5.2.4 Social Services and Public Facilities 2.5-5 2.5.2.5 Transportation 2.5-6 2.5.2.6 Demography 2.5-6a f-~3 ( i 2.5.2.7 Housing 2.5-6a 3
\ 2.5.2.8 Education 2.5-7 2.5.2.9 Recreation 2.5-7 2.5.3 Historical and Archeological Sites and Natural Landmarks 2.5-9 2.5.4 References 2.5-11 2.6 GEOLOGY 2.6-1 2.7 METEOROLOGY 2.7-1 2.7.1 General Description of Regional Climate 2.7-1 2.7.2 Seasonal and Annual Frequencies of Severe Weather Phenomena 2.7-1 2.7.3 Description of Local Airflow Patterns and Characteristics 2.7-2 2.7.4 Long-Term (Routine) Diffusion Estimates 2.7-3 2.7.5 Reference 2.7-4 2.8 RELATED FEDERAL PROJECT ACTIVITIES 2.8-1 2.9 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY 2.9-1 2.9.1 Air Quality Data Base 2.9-1 gS Supplement 5 2-111 December 1983 C
i .
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS C11 APTER 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont) Section Title Page 2.9.2 Analysis of Sulfur Dioxide-Monitoring Data 2.9-2 2.9.3 Analysis of Total Suspended Particulates-Monitoring Data 2.9-2 2.9.4 Analysis of Nitrogen Dioxide-Monitoring Data 2.9-3 2.9.5 Analysis of Settleable Particulates-Monitoring Data 2.9-3 2.9.6 Analysis of Ozone-Monitoring Data 2.9-3 2.9.7 Conclusions 2.9-3 2.9.8 References 2.9-5 2.10 NOISE 2.10-1 2.10.1 Site Characteristics 2.10-1 2.10.2 Ambient Sound Levels 2.10-2 2.10.3 Federal and State Standards 2.10-5 2.10.4 References 2.10-7 O 2-iv O
Nine Milo Point Unit 2 ER-OLS n CHAPTER 2 (%s) LIST OF TABLES (Cont) Table Number Title 2.3-14 MONTHLY VARIATION IN SELECTED WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF NINE MILE POINT, 197C 2.3-15 TRACE CONSTITUENTS LISTED IN NEW YORK STATE STANDARDS FOR CLASS A - SPECIAL WATERS 2.4-1 PHYLOGENETIC SPECIES LIST OF PLANTS RECORDED DURING 1979 FIELD SURVEY UNIT 2 SITE AND ENVIRONS 2.4-2
SUMMARY
OF OVERSTORY VEGETATION EARLY SECOND-GROWTH FOREST COVER TYPE - TRANSECT 1 2.4-3
SUMMARY
OF OVERSTORY VEGETATION
- /~N MIXED FOREST AND SHRUBLANDS COVER TYPE -
l I ,) TRANSECT 2 l l 2.4-4
SUMMARY
OF OVERSTORY VEGETATION MIXED HARDWOOD FOREST COVER TYPE - TRANSECT 3 2.4-5 SMALL-MAMMAL TRAPPING RESULTS 2.4-6 MAMMALIAN SPECIES AND MAJOR HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS IN OSWEGO COUNTY COASTAL ZONE, 1976 2.4-7 GAME AND FURBEARER SPECIES OF IMPORTANCE IN OSWEGO COUNTY 2.4-8 CHECKLIST OF AVIAN SPECIES AND THEIR OCCURRENCE IN OSWEGO COUNTY COASTAL ZONE 2.4-9 GENERALIZED HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OF MAJOR BREEDING SPECIES IN THE VICINITY OF UNIT 2 2.4-10 HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS FOR AVIAN SPECIES OCCURRING DURING NONBREEDING SEASONS IN THE VICINITY OF UNIT 2 f) G 2-vii l
Nino Milo Point Unit 2 ER-OLS CHAPTER 2 LIST OF TABLES (Cont) Table Number Title 2.4-11 ROADSIDE COUNT AND BREEDING BIRD CENSUS FOR AREAS ADJACENT TO UNIT 2 SITE, 1976 2.4-12 BIRD OF PREY NESTING LOCATIONS 2.4-13 HERPETOFAUNA COMMONLY OCCURRING IN THE OSWEGO COUNTY COASTAL ZONE 2.4-14 COMMON VEGETATION SPECIES LIKELY TO OCCUR WITHIN THE UNIT 2-VOLNEY 345-KV RIGHT-OF-WAY 2.4-15 PRELIMINARY VEGETATION ANALYSIS SURVEY OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE UNIT 2-VOLNEY 345-KV TRANSMISSION FACILITY 2.4-16 NEW YORK STATE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED FISH SPECIES 2.5-1 1980 POPULATION AND POPULATION DENSITIES FOR TOWNS AND CITIES WITHIN 16 KM (10 MI) OF UNIT 2 2.5-2 1970-1980 POPULATION GROWTH FOR TOWNS AND CITIES WITHIN 16 KM (10 MI) OF UNIT 2 2.5-3 DELETED 2.5-4 DELETED 5 2.5-5 DELETED 2.5-6 DELETED 2.5-7 DELETED 2.5-8 DELETED 2.5-9 DELETED 2.5-10 DELETED 2.5-11 DELETED 2.5-12 DELETED Supplement 5 2-viii December 1983
l Nina Mile Point Unit 2 ER-GLS [J L t CHAPTER 2 LIST OF TABLES (Cont) Table Number Title 2.5-13 DELETED 2.5-14 DELETED 3 2.5-15 DELETED 2.5-16 DELETED 2.5-17 CIVIL DIVISIONS WITH OVER 10,000 PEOPLE IN 1980 WITHIN 80 KM (50 MI) OF UNIT 2 2.5-18 EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY OSWEGO COUNTY - 1970 2.5-19 EMPLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION OSWEGO COUNTY - 1970 rx 2.5-20 LABOR FORCE AND EMPLOYMENT BY AREA - 1970 U 2.5-21 MEDIAN INCOME FOR CITIES AND TOWNS IN THE VICINITY OF NINE MILE POINT STATION - 1970 2.5-22 SCHOOL DISTRICT TAX RATES FOR CITIES AND TOWNS IN THE VICINITY OF NINE MILE POINT STATION - 1976-1977 2.5-23 OSWEGO COUNTY REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES - 1976 2.5-24 1976 PROPERTY TAX STATISTICS RATES AND REVENUES FOR CITIES AND TOWNS IN THE VICINITY OF NINE MILE POINT STATION 2.5-25 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS FOR CITIES AND TOWNS SURROUNDING NINE MILE POINT STATION - 1970 2.5-26 LOCATION AND ENROLLMENT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN OSWEGO COUNTY - SEPTEMBER 1982 2.5-27 SCHOOL DISTRICTS SERVING CITIES AND TOWNS IN THE VICINITY OF NINE MILE POINT STATION Supplement 5 2-ix December 1983 a i
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS CHAPTER 2 LIST OF TABLES (Cont) Table Number Title 2.5-28 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF NINE MILE POINT STATION 2.5-29 MAJOR CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF NINE MILE POINT STATION 2.5-30
SUMMARY
OF OUTDOOR RECREATION AREAS AND OPEN SPACE IN OSWEGO COUNTY 2.5-31 MARINAS IN OSWEGO COUNTY 2.5-32 OSWEGO COUNTY GOLF COURSES 2.5-33 COMMEFCIAL CAMPGROUNDS IN OSWEGO COUNTY 2.5-34 HISTORIC SITES WITHIN 15 KM OF UNIT 2 2.5-35 CULTURAL RESOURCE SITES WITHIN 15 KM OF UNIT 2 2.9-1 AIR QUALITY MONITORING STATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF THE UNIT 2 SITE 2.9-2 NEW YORK STATE AND FEDERAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS 2.9-3 SO2 -MONITORING RESULTS 2.9-4 TSP-MONITORING RESULTS 2.9-5 NO2 -MONITORING RESULTS t 2.9-6 SETTLEABLE PARTICULATES-MONITORING DATA 2.9-7 OZONE-MONITORING RESULTS 2.10-1 NINE MILE POINT AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS 2.10-2 NINE MILE POINT RESIDUAL SOUND LEVELS 2.10-3 NINE MILE POINT AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY 2-x 0 l
-. . . - ~ _ - - - _ - _ - - _ - - _
. . - . . . . . ---- - - - - =.. .
,e Nin'a Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS i ;
1 W O ' ' CHAPTER 2 . LIST OF'hIGURES (Cont) e Figure
- Number Title 2.5-1 TOWNS OF OSWEGO COUNTY WITHIN 16 KM OF SITE 2.5-2 POLITICAL BOUNDARIES OF COUNTIES AND POPULATION CENTERS WITHIN 80 KM 2.5-3 DELETED 2.5-4 DELETED <
l 2.5-5 DELETED 2.5-6 DELETED j 2.5-7 DELETED 2.5-8 DELETED ,
/ 2.5-9 DELETED ,
2.5-10 -DELETED 2.5-11 DELETED =~ 2.5-12 DELETED , y ,
~
, 2.5-13 DELETED 2.5-14 DELETED 2.5-15 DELETED -- 2.5-16 DELETED , 2.5-17 DELETED . 2.5-18 RIVERS AND LAKES IN OSWEGO COUNTY 2.5-19 HISTORICAL SITES AND CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN 15 KM OF UNIT 2 2.9-1 LOCATION OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING SITES Supplement 5 2-xiii December 1983 (} 1 d, ** n-- - - - ,y-, +-n-- p.--, - - - - - -- ---- r- , , , < , - , - , , m,__mn,---. 4-n , ---r ,,,m_a,-,--,---v~me--w-e- ---w,w,---,~ o wew-,r--
2 , s Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS s CHAPTER 2 LIST OF FIGURES (Cont) Figure Number Title 2.10-1 AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS 2.10-2 AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY CNA HOURLY STATISTICAL NOISE DATA SITE NO. 1
- 2.10-3 AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY CNA HOURLY STATISTICAL NOISE DATA SITE NO. 2 2.10-4 AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY CNA HOURLY STATISTICAL NOISE DATA SITE NO. 3 3
2.10-5 AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY CNA HOURLY STATISTICAL NOISE DATA SITE NO. 4 O i l l l k i Supplement 2 2-xiv June 1983 0
.4*
A R I O N T } O K E A L ) UNIT 2 -
,d '
BjPLANT 's :
. i. ,b : .- -
f a :.? p'r-sl
'q ' :
', G ,\ ~,\ \ ,j
'Y
\ bnTa E t ',
O ;
._ -. -)*. :x !=
Lokeview *
, NINE MILE PolhT SITE g
- FIT 2 PATRICK SITE
\\ .
,f < i
\ fa '+, -- POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK o
3.,**g /
- l PRODERTY LINE i l
) 4 5 5
NIAGARA MOHAWK ,a POWER CORP 1 I i PROPERTY UNE
- MINE R DO -
(EXCLUSION AREA BOUNDARY) W I'0 " y,
# l &
,5W l1 f
- l:
O \ \, e , NO,,, f x {i i Scribo
\\'
'?
i
\ '
?, s
\\ s
\
l i n0&O p i
~
to t O DL E g 6 i O
..~
1
\
\ re n ,, wasva,.n.
FIGURE 2.1-3 9 i , ! SCALE - MILE S SITE BOUNDARIES AND
?
SC A L E - ItlLO M E T E R S TRANSPORTATION ROUTES NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT S DECEMBER 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 1,840 vehicles on Route 1A, 4 km (2.5 mi) southwest of the (~'}
\ _ ,/ site. Within 10 km (6.2 mi) of the site are 11 county roads and 2 state highways. The two state highways are Routes 104 and 104B, 6.2 km (3.9 mi) and 8 km (5 mi) southeast of the site, respectively. County Route 29 connects with Route 104 at approximately 6 km (3.7 mi) south-southeast of the site.
Daily traffic volume for Route 104 was 5,841 vehicles in 1979 and 7,000 vehicles in 1976(2'. Table 2.2-5 provides daily traffic volumes of county roads within the vicinity of the site. Figure 2.2-4 identifies major transportation cor-ridors within the 10-km (6.2-mi) radius of Unit 2. The nearest air field to the site is Lakeside Airstrip, a private facility which operates primarily as a maintenance s airstrip and is located east of Route 176, approximately 10 km (6.2 mi) south of Unit 2. Approximately 72 km (45 mi) of the New York State Barge Canal system are located within Oswego County. The Oswego Canal, which is composed of the Oswego River and the Oneida River, flows north 38 km (24 mi) to Lake Ontario. The con-fluence of the Oswego River and Lake Ontario lies in the vicinity of the Nine Mile Point site. The canal drops over 0.036 km (120 ft) from Oneida Lake to
- Lake Ontario through the use of seven locks, located at
( ; Brewerton, Phoenix, Fulton, Minetto, and Oswego. Lock 7 is
\/ located in the city of Oswego and within the site vicinity.
The lock dimensions are 14 by 90 m (45 by 300 ft). Commercial boats have priority over pleasure boats for pas-sage through the canal. No other restrictions, however, are imposed on pleasure boat travel on the canal. The average operating season begins in mid-April and extends to the first week in December. Terminals for freight handling are located in the city of Oswego. Within the 10-km (6.2-mi) radius of Unit 2 are four trans-mission corridors. Three of the corridors lead from Unit 1 and the JAF plant. Running south from Unit 1 are two 115-kV and two 345-kV lines. From the JAF plant is one 115-kV line running in a southerly direction and one 345-kV line running in a southeasterly direction. 2.2.1.3 Local and Regional Land Use Plans for Site and Vicinity The site and its immediate area have been designated for continued expansion of the electric power generating indus-try by the Oswego County Planning Board and zoning regulations. Other industrial growth is anticipated by the 73 Oswegc County Planning Board for the Oswego River Corridor ('-' ) Supplement 5 2.2-3 December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS and in the vicinity of the cities of Oswego and Fulton. Ac-cording to the 1985 and 2000 Land Use Plans for Oswego County, the area in the site vicinity has been designated primarily for rural / agricultural land uses. Future residen-tial development in Oswego County has been designated along the Oswego River Corridor and the county's southern 2l border (2) . According to the New York Statewide Comprehensive Recreation Plan, no state facilities are proposed within 10 km (6.2 mi) of the power station. The only future recreational ac-tivitias proposed for Oswego County are park expansions at Selkirk Shores State Park and at Salmon River Reservoir in the town of Orwell'38 The 10-km (6.2-mi) radius from-Unit 2 encompasses portions of the towns of Scriba and New Haven, and a small portion of the city of Oswego. The towns of Scriba and New Haven presently have no zoning restrictions. The only existing land use controls for the two towns are building codes and floodplain regulations. The city of Oswegc has zoning as well as building codes that apply to the use of city water and floodplain regulations'18 . As discussed in Section 2.2.1.2, the towns of Scriba and New Haven are part of agricultural districts in which designated agricultural lands are eligible for tax incentives if the land is kept in agricultural production. 2.2.2 Land Use: Transmission Corridors and Offsite Areas 2.2.2.1 Transmission Corridors The new transmiccion line will extend from Unit 2 to the existing 345-kV Volney Station, 15 km (9.4 mi) south-southeast of the power plant. The new transmission line will parallel four existing lines: two 115-kV and two 345-kV new lines. Two other 115-kV lines run perpendicular to the line 1 km (0.62 mi) south of State Highway 104. The two transmission lines of the JAF plant are located ap-proximately 1 km (0.62 mi) east of the new line. Figure 2.2-7 identifies the location of the existing and proposed transmission lines. The existing transmission corridor has a width of 152.4 m This right-of-way (ROW) is owned by NMPC. The (500 ft). 30.5 m centerl;ne of the new transmission line is located Supplement 2 2.2-4 June 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS
) 2.5 SOCIOECONOMICS 2.5.1 Demography Unit 2 is located on Lake Ontario in the town of Scriba, in the north central portion of Oswego County, approximately 10 km (6.2 mi) northeast of the city of Oswego. In 1980, Oswego County had an estimated population of 113,901, at an average density of 43 people /sq km (111 people /sq mi)(1) .
This population density is considerably lower than the state average of 137 people /sq km (356 people /sq mi). The 1980 population and the population density for the 8 towns and 1 5 city within 16 km (10 mi) of Unit 2 are listed in Table 2.5-1. Town and city boundaries are shown on Figure 2.5-1. The 80-km (50-mi) area surrounding the station contains all or portions of 10 New York State counties and portions of Can.7da. Also within 80 km (50 mi) is the Syracuse Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA). Political boundaries of counties and population centers within 80 km (50 mi) are shown on Figure 2.5-2. 2.5.1.1 Population Within 16 Km (10 Mi) /~'N The total 1980 population within 16 km (10 mi) of Unit 2 is (_) estimated to be 35,467. This population is projected to increase to approximately 48,165 by the year 2000 and to ap-3 proximately 74,082 by 2030828 The 16-km (10-mi) area con-tains all or portions of 1 city and 8 towns: the city of Oswego and the towns of Minetto, Scriba, New Haven, Oswego, Mexico, Palermo, Volney, and Granby. City and town boundaries are shown on Figure 2.5-1. Of the 8 towns and 1 city in the 16-km (10-mi) area, the city of Oswego is the largest in 8 population size, containing approximately 19,793 people in 1980. Next, in order of population, are Granby, Scriba, and Volney, with estimated 1980 populations of 6,341, 5,455, and 5,358, respectively(18 Population growth and the Supplement 5 2.5-1 December 1983 O O
Nint Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 1970-1980 percent change in population for the towns and city partially or entirely within the 16-km (10-mi) area are l 5l listed in Table 2.5-2. It is expected that a large portion of the population growth sl in the 16-km (10-mi) area will occur around the southeastern fringes of the city of Oswego, with the surrounding towns of Scriba, Palermo, New Haven, and Volney absorbing much of the city's satellite growth <2> , Population distribution within 6 km (3.7 mi) of the station s is based on a field survey conducted in May 1982. Between 6 and 16 km (3.7 and 10 mi), population distribution is based on a house count taken from U.S. Geological Survey maps (photorevised 1978) on which houses have been symbolically identified and on field verification <a> . Houses were used to estimate the area population by applying town-specific 5 people per household factors derived from 1980 census data factors. Population figures within 10 km (6.2 mi) of the site were then projected by multiplying the base-year population by the Oswego County growth factor, supplied by the New York State Department of Commerce, Economic Develop-ment Board, which used the cohort-component method to obtain projections'*'. Population distribution within a 16-km s (10 mi) radius of the station is listed in Tables 7C-1 through 7C-7 in Appendix 7C. sl Transient population within 16 km (10 mi) of Unit 2 is limited due to the rural, undeveloped character of the area. There are, however, a number of school, industrial, and recreational facilities in the area that create small, daily Supplement 5 2.5-2 December 1983 O
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS ( and seasonal changes in sector populations. Facilities at-tracting transient population associated with educational and industrial institutions, as well as marinas and commer-cial campgrounds, are discussed in Section 2.5.2; those as-sociated with other recreational areas are discussed in Sec-tion 2.2.3 (Table 2.2-12). Data on distribution of tran-sient population associated with marinas are not available. Age distribution of the populatione in the towns and city within 16 km (10 mi) of the station are in general conform- ls ance with the proportional population distributions of the state of New York and the United States'2,s) , 2.5.1.2 Population Between 16 and 80 Km (10 and 50 Mi) ls The total population for the area within 80 km (50 mi) of Unit 2, which was approximately 927,624 in 1980, is expected to grow to approximately 1,082,865 in the year 2000, and reach a total of approximately 1,558,957 by s 2030<t,as,27,as> . Population distribution in the 80-km (50-mi) area for 1980, 1986, 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020, and 2030 is listed in Tables 7C-1 through 7C-7 in Appendix 7C. The 80-km (50-mi) area contains portions of three Canadian census divisions located in the Province of Ontario: Prince Edward, Frontenac, and Addington and Lenox. The 1981 (9 e _/ population statistics for these census divisions are in-cluded in Tables 7C-1 through 7C-7 of Appendix 7C. ls The 80-km (50-mi) region is moderately populated. In 1980, only the population in the city of Syracuse and its satel-lite towns exceeded 100,000, and only seven other population centers contained more than 10,000 people (18 Table 2.5-17 lists civil divisions with over 10,000 people. , Three SMSAs are partially located within an 80-km (50-mi) radius of the station: the Syracuse SMSA, the Rochester SMSA, and the Utica-Rome SMSA. The Syracuse SMSA, including l the counties of Onondaga, Oswego, and Madison, contained ap-proximately 643,000 people in 1980, at an average density of s 103 people /sq km (266 people /sq mi). This SMSA is expected to reach a total population of approximately 782,000 by the year 2000'*). The Rochester SMSA includes five counties; only one, Wayne County, falls within the 80-km (50-mi) region. In 1980, approximately 971,000 people lived in the Rochester SMSA, at an average density of 126 people /sq km s (327 people /sq mi)'8) . By the year 2000, the Rochester SMSA is expected to support approximately 1,194,000, Supplement 5 2.5-3 December 1983 v _ ~ - _ - . _ _ -_ __ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . ,
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS _ respectively'48 Finally, the Utica-Rome SMSA contains only two counties, Oneida and Herkimer, and only part of Oneida County is located within the 80-km (50-mi) region. In 1980, 5 approximately 320,000 people resided in the Utica-Rome SMSA, at an average density of 47 people /sq km (123 people /sq mi)'8'. Polar-grid sector populations between 16 and 80 km (10 and 50 mi) are based on 1980 U.S. Census data, New York State population projections, and 1981 Canadian data and projec-tion statistics. Sector populations were determined by as-suming' that the population of a minor civil division (i.e., 5 a town) is evenly distributed over its land area. The proportion of each civil division's area in each grid sector was then determined and applied to each civil division's total population, yielding the population in each grid sector. Population projections were applied to each civil division, assuming that each portion would maintain its relative share of any population change. Population density was calculated by dividing the population in each sector by its land area'5'. 2.5.2 Community Characteristics of Region This section describes the employment, economic base, taxation, and other pertinent characteristics of the town of Scriba and the surrounding cities and towns within 15 km (9.3 mi) of Unit 2, including: New Haven, Volney, Mexico, Richland, Palermo, Oswego Town, Oswego City, and Minetto. Where a broader context is relevant, data on Oswego County, the Syracuse SMSA, and New York State are included. Figure 2.5-17 shows the location of these cities and towns relative to Unit 2. 2.5.2.1 Employment and Economic Base Table 2.5-18 shows employment by industry for Oswego County <2> . Employment by occupation for the county in 1970 is shown in Table 2.5-19. In 1980, the civilian l'bor a force in Oswego County totaled 53,400. Of this labor force, 5,300 were unemployed, thus accounting for a 10-percent unemployment rate'88 Oswego County had a higher unemployment rate than both the regional Syracuse SMSA and the New York State unemployment rates. Table 2.5-20 lists county versus regional and state em-ployment statistics. The major industries within 15 km (9.3 mi) of Unit 2 are in-dustrial manufacturers, paper product manufacturers and Supplement 5 2.5-4 December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS l printers, food distributors, and electric utilities. The major employers in the vicinity are: Alcan Aluminum Corporation, with approximately 1,000 employees; Cyclotherm, with between 100 and 199; Copperweld Corporation, with 142; Oswego Castings Corporation, with between 100 and 199; Power Authority of the State of New York, with between 150 and 200; and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC), with ap-proximately 400 to 450 employees (288 Median income for Oswego County residents equaled $9,254 in 1970. The average annual income for Scriba residents, o () Supplement 5 2.5-4a December 1983
l Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS O THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK O Supplement 5 2.5-4b December 1983 O
I l Nina Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS
# $8,966, was below the county average, while for Oswego City
) residents it was approximately average at $9,255.
Table 2.5-21 lists median income data for communities in the vicinity of Unit 2. 2.5.2.2 Taxation The county levies a school tax by municipality and school districts. Such taxes for the towns, villages, and cities within the vicinity of Unit 2 are shown in Table 2.5-22. Major sources of county revenues include: property taxes, school taxes, state aid, federal aid, federal transfer payments, and federal revenue sharing. Table 2.5-23 lists revenue and expenditure categories for Oswego County for 1976. All property in the county is assessed based on county, town, and village rates on the value of buildings, equipment, and land. The property taxes for Unit 2 are paid to Oswego County and the town of Scriba. Table 2.5-24 lists property tax bases, rates, and revenues for cities and towns within the vicinity of Unit 2. 2.5.2.3 Zoning ( ( ,) Fifteen of the 32 villages and towns and both cities of Oswego and Fulton in Oswego County have adopted zoning ordinances. The town of Scriba has not adopted zoning ordinances. Since the boundaries for NMPC property at Nine Mile Point Station fall within Scriba, no zoning restric-tions apply (28 2.5.2.4 Social Services and Public Facilities Many public water systems supplement independent means of providing drinking water in Oswego County. The service area within 10 km (6.2 mi) of Unit 2 includes the town of Scriba and the city of Oswego. The city of Oswego and portions of the towns of Oswego, Minetto, Scriba, and Volney are served by the city's public water facilities. The water is drawn from Lake Ontario, treated, and distributed by the city to its customers and the outlying water districts. The city's intake and pumping facilities are more than adequate for current demands (11) . The town of Scriba is served by the Hall Road, Middle Road, North Road, and Seneca Hill Water Districts. Approximately 40 percent of the population in the town of scriba in nerved by these districts. The Seneca Hill District is a joint
~
2.5-5 s_ ,
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS district, serving portions of the towns of Scriba and Volney. The water is provided to these districts by the h city of Oswego and resold by the town of Scriba to its customers (22) . The two major users in Scriba the Alcan Aluminum plant and Unit 2, purchase water directly from the city of Oswego. The 1979 average daily demand in the town of Scriba was 908,400 1/d (240,000 gpd)<2,st) . Additional storage and system strengthening will probably be required to meet the town's future water supply requirements (22) . The city of Oswego operates a secondary sewage treatment plant, the East Side Sewage Treatment Plant, that serves residents and industry located on the east side of the Oswego River and portions of the town of Scriba. The majority of solid waste in the county is disposed of through county-operated facilities. Police protection in Oswego County is provided by three sources: the Oswego Police Department, the Oswego County Sheriff, and the New York State Police. The Oswego Sheriff's Department operates the Oswego County Jail, a 5 facility with capacity for 96 people, which is located in the city of Oswego. Fire protection for Oswego County is provided by several volunteer departments as well as by two professional departments. Oswego County is well served with medical facilities ct2> , The Oswego Hospital is located in the city of Oswego and operates 132 certified beds. The Albert Lindley Lee Memorial Hospital in Fulton is licensed to operate 67 beds. The Oswego County Community Mental Health Services facility is located in the city of Oswego. Six nursing homes operate in Oswego County. The Andrew Michaud Nursing Home in Fulton operates 81 cer-tified beds; the Harr-Wood Nursing Home in Oswego City operates 120 certified beds; the Hillcrest Nursing Home in s Oswego City operates 80 certified beds; the Oswego Hospital Extended Care Facility in Oswego City operates 38 certified beds; the Pontiac Nursing Home in Oswego City operates 80 certi fied beds; and Saint Luke Nursing Home Company, Inc., in Oswego City operates 120 certified beds <t2) , 2.5.2.5 Transportation Transportation facilities are discussed in Sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.3. There are no modifications planned due to Unit 2 operation that would affect traffic flow. Supplement 5 2.5-6 December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS () 2.5.2.6 Demography Population forecasts for the site vicinity are provided in Section 2.5.1, which also includes a discussion of social s structure elements, such as age, and institutional and tran-sient populations. 2.5.2.7 Housing Housing characteristics for cities, villages, and towns in the vicinity of Nine Mile Point Station are listed in Table 2.5-25. Although many communities in Oswego County O supp1em.nt e 2.5 ea m.c.mser 1983 c;)
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS O THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK O Supplement 5 2.5-6b December 1983 0
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS O ig 2.5.4 References
- 1. Bureau of the Census. Number of Inhabitants, New York.
5 PC80-1-34, U.S. Department of Commerce, February 1982.
- 2. Oswego County Planning Board. Oswego County Data Book, 1977. Oswego, NY.
- 3. U.S. Geological Survey. 7.5 minute quadrangles:
Oswego West, Texas, West of Texas, New Haven, and Oswego East. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
- 4. 1978 Official Population Projections for New York State Counties. New York State Department of Commerce, Economic Development Board, September 1980. l5
- 5. Population Distribution Program EN-061. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, Boston, MA, November 1981.
- 6. Bureau of the Census. County and City Data Book 1977.
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1978. DELETED 7. ls N G. State of New York Department of Commerce. Annual Report s ) 1979-1980, Economic Development, Trade and Tourism, Albany, NY.
- 9. New York State Department of Commerce. Business l Statistics, New York State Annual Summary 1971-1979.
Albany, NY.
- 10. Oswego Chamber of Commerce. Major Industries in Oswego County. Oswego, NY, 1980.
- 11. Central New York Regional Planning and Development Board. Central New York Water Quality Management Program: Final Oswego County Subplan, 1979. Syracuse, NY.
- 12. State of New York, Office of Health Systems Management.
Health Facilities Directory, 1980. Albany, NY.
- 13. New York State Department of Commerce. Profile of People, Jobs, and Housing, Syracuse Area, 1974 edition, Albany, NY.
- 14. Information Center on Education. Public School Enroll-ment and Staff, New York State 1979-1980. Albany, NY.
Supplement 5 2.5-11 December 1983 {v}
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS
- 15. Information Center on Education. Directory of Public Schools and Administrators, New York State 1980-1981.
The State Education Department,-Albany, NY.
- 16. Oswego County Planning Board. Preliminary Land Use Plan, 1976. Oswego, NY.
- 17. Bogner, J. A Natural Resources Inventory for the Town of Scriba, New York, 1979. Oswego County Planning Board and Environmental Management Council and Massachusetts Audubon Society.
- 18. Oswego County Planning Board. Preliminary Outdoor Re-creation Plan, 1979. Oswego, NY.
- 19. Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service. National Register of Historic Places. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC , April 14, 1981.
- 20. Transmittal from Ms. Carol Kingsbury, Project Review Assistant. Historic Preservation Field Services, New York State Parks and Recreation, Albany, NY, December 12, 1978.
- 21. National Park Service. National Registry of Natural Landmarks, Federal Registry of Natural Landmarks, 46FR17891, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, March 20, 1981.
- 22. Pratt & Pratt Archeological Consultants. Background and Literature Search for the Cultural Resources Survey of the Proposed Nine Mile 2-Volney 765 kV Electric Trans-mission Project, 1977.
- 23. New York State Department of Recreation. New York State Outdoor Recreation Facilities Inventory, 1978.
- 24. New York State Department of Recreation. Parks Capacities for Oswego County, 1977.
- 25. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation. Nine Mile Point Nu-clear Station - Unit 2 Environmental Report - Construc-tion Permit State, Appendix C, 1972.
- 26. Ministry of Treasury and Economics, Central Statistical Services, Ontario: Population Projections by Regions 5
and Counties for Years 1981, 1986, 1996, 2001. Toronto, Canada, February 1979. Supplement 5 2.5-12 December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS
- 27. Ministry of Treasury and Economics, Central Statistical Services, Ontario: Population Projections for Counties of 10,000 Population and Over (in 1976) 1981, 1986, 1996, 2001 (concluded). Toronto, Canada, April 1980. s
- 28. Statistics Canada, 1976 Final Population, 1981 Population and Dwellings; Canada, Provinces, Census Divisions and Subdivisions. Ottawa, Canada, 1982.
O Supplement 5 2.5-13 December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS () TABLE 2.5-1 1980 POPULATION AND POPULATION DENSITIES FOR TOWNS AND CITIES WITHIN 16 KM (10 MI) OF UNIT 2* ls Approximate Population Density i 1980 Population (people /sq km) City of Oswego 19,793 1,029 Oswego (town) 7,865 117 Granby 6,341 55 l3 Scriba 5,455 53 Volney 5,358 46 Mexico 4,790 42 l, Palermo 3,253 32 New Haven 2,421 32 Minetto 1,905 126 SOURCE: Reference 1
*These numbers represent the entire population of the 5 respective town or city.
Supplement 5 1 of 1 December 1983
Nina Milo Point Unit 2 ER-OLS () TABLE 2.5-2 1970-1980 POPULATION GROWTH FOR TOWNS AND CITIES WITHIN 16 KM (10 MI) OF UNIT 2* l5 1970-1980 1970 1980 Percent Change City of Oswego 20,913 19,793 -5.4 Oswego (town) 6,514 7,865 20.7 Granby 4,718 6,341 34.4 Scriba 3,619 5,455 50.7 Volney 4,520 5,358 18.5 Mexico 4,174 4,790 14.8 5 Palermo 2,321 3,253 40.2 New Haven 1,845 2,421 31.2 Minetto 1,688 1,905 12.9 O) N-SOURCE: Reference 1
*These numbers represent population and growth in the entire 3 town or city.
Supplement 5 1 of 1 December 1983 1 __ - _ o
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.5-3 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. s
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.5-4 g 1se 1meeseszzem es reis esos ess ezes ezczzee. . Supplement 5 December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS O TABLE 2.5-5 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED, s f l Supplement 5 December 1983 O
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.5-6 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. 5 Supplement 5 December 1983 0
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.5-7 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. s S ...n s o.c... 1ees iii .i r
' i i
} Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 1
, t TABLE 2.5-8 f 1
i , I J i i l ,i ! 2 i I i 1 8 i. l THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. s i i l i i i l l i i t
! i
! L i ! 1 i Supplement 5 December 1983 I@ I I ]
~,, - , . .,,-, - , . - - - - .- ---- ~ . - ,.- -
l Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.5-9 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. s O S. - ....t 5 D.c... 1ees
til
#84 e
m L 9 4 5 W O O W
>=
W
.J W
O m 2 J W O W e O M W O 4 N Z O a e- W
- 4 Q C D 4 3
- L N
a @ C W -
~ A Z 0 C >=
A 4
>= 2 S 0
- E i E O C
- {
E Z O 6 Z Z
>=
a C O E C G l "3 i O '
l Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.5-11 l i l i l I 4 i i 1 l ( ., THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. a l5 1 1 4 ,i l 1 I I l
\ l 1 t t
4, l Oupplement 5 December 1983 ' i i i
-mim i a s
{ E 4 i s . i .-
)
s 6 p s I @ i m b 9
' 4
~~ k E o
U N 9 Q 6 k s I w O I O w
- e-5 W
, d hJ
' O
- M Z d a / W u - cy w 9 CD C: .
. .J > r M s
- c. ' -N 6 , i <
Z s - t w
= 6 O C e* 4 3 4 5 ,N p 4 .Y Un C -& =
- J s. I 4 C 32 &
. % A 'g (
> Z t, e t s
o ll - t z z
, o C ,
.C-b s
g o 6 1 z w Z 4 4> _ 4 5 i
't g 5 k k '
t
- 2 9
4 ( (
\
i s I\ ** g i 4 A
-1 ;; s s
i
'\' C f
4 i i E i, _e h a g A - , CL s 3 s 4 + M i 1' ; t 1 i +
M C 0% e= b O S e U O W W W
.J W
Q N E d W O W e go E W M 4 N M d W - "9 O C D 4 D
- L N
& W C W
- J g O CD g A 4
- g 4 O
~ E E O C Z a O w Z. Z
>=
a C C E e a 3 0 1 1
M m e L 9 D G G U Q 6 0 0 W W W J W Q M J Z O W e W M M N 4 Z a 3
- e W C e O D
$ k a a C M y -
O .J Z Ch. dI) M 4
> Z
.e. Q O ~~O C *
~
=
m O w
.Z.
Z a C C E
.O.
CL 3 to
In P5 O O e= b O a E O U Q O W W W
.J W
Q W .J Z O W s W E C W O N 4 s = e e
.= W C e 4 3 4
- e. A d N C @
- a ~ O J Z A gn > e > Z = 0 K Z O 9 - C W - 4 Z E E O w Z. W Z A a C O E O a 3 W
m M 80 Ch e L C D E o U Q O w
>=
W J w O M J Z Q W e W M W W O N 4 Z a y
- e W C e O D 4 A. A a cy
-C M
- y ~
O J - L m
- 4 O >= Z O
Z O g C 6"-
=
0 w Z Z
>=
D a C O R c a 3 M
9 O i t i
,, mat 5
- u. -*c <=c
... r,4' ' ', , H
=
- / r 's ,
t I 1. RICH L A ND
\ ,
i \ l \ I i \ N N E \%
/
o'.).h g,[ i: 1
*5" t !* H A v '
; ij? i
- lil;j}};,' lj sCRI8A I l MEX1C0
- r. 3 I
g / 's l
.. s j ~~ se
~~~~~~
j oswEoo\ ) %, N- /
's
; g / s I \
/sst
/
[ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ha /
/
P AL ER MO / s f VOL NEY (7 O
/
/ /
l l /
/
/
l / 0 2 4 M aL L - ettis x.....-,i., FIGURE 2.5-1 . TOWNS OF OSWEGO COUNTY WITHIN 16 km OF SITE NtAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ' ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT S DECEMBER 1983
FRONTENAC C js H A STINGS \ AD NGTON \ CO. \ - CO.NN
~~~
NNE h J F E R S O N CO. NW -
'f / g NE 4 PRINCE R/
EDWARD CO ARDBAY
/_.__ -
~
9-s N (J Y a ,/ j x tertown ,
%o /
o h l \ d WNW P OV NCE
/ /
ONTARI '
/
/
I - ENE {\
,/ /,'4 N \ \
CAN
/ DA/ / / '
'"E x
A( N T r ' ~ . - - l\
\ LE
{ \ IS C
\.
--- . i
,7/ 8
; \
N j it I E SOM 45 40 35 30 25 20 125:5 175 W l' 1 i' 'I p E\
\
\ R ON
\ \;
~
- lTE
/ **-
/
-q/
" t' '
- i
\0 s \ \
i
'I\x r ,2 ,,
/- // - ( ,
gJ \1 x 7 c l ASW x ( ; D"O ILAKb
/ < . ESE
**Y '
'N AYUGA l E l_ _ _ c , N s
~
,I ~
J LAKE
.N'ji!.
{ / \ ONTARIO O.
-~e SENE A C s
N. ~ ' Aubur ONONDA A Syra use d'
- e. /
/ SE l i
Wat rioo -
$\ L__
. Canondolquo D \ prf co / SON CO.
Geneva Seneco\ lls ; t 'N [_ s L TE t-SSW i ,. __ S s_E4 q g , i
? *?
scatt -witts FIGURE 2.5-2 POLITICAL BOUNDARIES OF COUNTIES AND POPULATION CENTERS WITHIN 80km NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
l 1 O THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED O . FIGURE 2.5-3 O NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
O THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED O - FIGURE 2.5-4
'O NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
r O THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED O FIGURE 2.5-5 O NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
O THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED O FIGURE 2.5-6 O NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
l lO l t l THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED
,O ,
FIGURE 2.5-7 l O NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS l SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983 L- - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . . ____ _ ____ _ _ _ . _
O THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED O FIGURE 2.5-8 O NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
O THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED , O FIGURE 2.5-9 O NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
l O THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED O FIGURE 2.5-10 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
O THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED O FIGURE 2.5-11 j O NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
O THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED O FIGURE 2.5-12 O NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
O THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED O FIGURE 2.5-13 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
O THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED O 4 FIGURE 2.5-14 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION l NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
O THIS FIGURE HAS GEEN DELETED O i FIGURE 2.5-15 NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
O THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED O FIGURE 2.5-16 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
_ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . - _ .m.4 m- - _. _ -.. + A.. _-h- -3 _. 4. & __ W5 O : THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED
- O l
1 l l FIGURE 2.5-17 O NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
Nino Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS () CHAPTER 3 LIST OF FIGURES (Cont) Figure Number Title 3.4-9 COOLING TOWER 3.7-1 UNIT 2 - VOLNEY 345-KV TRANSMISSION FACILITY 3.7-2 TWO POLE TANGENT "H" FRAME, 345 KV 3.7-3 345 SINGLE CIRCUIT 3 STEEL POLE STRUCTURE 3 TYPE 345 KV ST 1.4 DE-TS-3P 3.7-4 SYSTEM RELATIONSHIP 3.7-5 EXISTING UNIT 2 - VOLNEY RIGHT-OF-WAY O Supplement 5 3-vii December 1983 0
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS () 3.5 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS The expected reactor coolant and main steam activities form the basis for estimating the average quantity of radioactive material released to the envirc.nment and reflect normal operating conditions including operational occurrences. These data (FSAR Table 11.1-1) are based on methods that are s consistent with NUREG-0016, Revision 1, and represent failed fuel conditions corresponding to an off-gas release rate of 0.05 Ci/sec at 30 min delay. Plant parameters used to determine the expected source terms are listed in Table 3.S-6. 3.5.1 Radioactive Liquid Waste System The radioactive liquid waste system (LWS) collects, monitors, and processes for reuse or disposal all liquids received from the reactor coolant system or liquids that can become contaminated from contact with the reactor coolant system. The LWS is capable of processing the anticipated quantities and activities of liquid waste resulting from normal operation and maintenance, as listed in Table 3.5-1. The LWS is capable of processing the maximum daily input from , all sources, except for regenerant chemical wastes, within 24 hr. Tanks are provided for storage of the regenerant chemical wastes not processed within 24 hr. The majority of the processed effluent is reused. The waste effluent discharged from the station is within the limits of 10CFR20 and meets the guidelines of Appendix I to 10CFR50. The system is divided into three major subsystems and one I minor subsystem. The waste collector, floor drain, and regenerant chemical subsystems are tha three major subsystems, and the phase separator is the minor subsystem. A piping and instrumentation flow diagram for the LWS is shown on FSAR Figure 11.2-1. 3.5.1.' Waste Collector Subsystem Wastes entering the waste collector subsystem have variable activity levels, depending on their source and conductivity (less than 50 umho/cm). There are three waste collector tanks plus one waste collector surge tank receiving liquid wastes from designated systems. Radioactive materials are removed from these wastes by filtration (insolubles removal) and ion exchange (soluble and colloidal removal). The filter backwash is decanted and the sludge transferred to the solid radwaste system. Mixed-resin deep-bed Supplement 5 3.5-1 December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS demineralizers purify the filter effluent. Spent resin is transferred to the condensate demineralizer regeneration system for cleanup. Following batch sampling and analysis, the processed liquids are either returned to the condensate storage tank or recycled to the waste collector tank for reprocessing. Inflow to the wacto collector subsystem includes drains from piping and equipment containing high-quality water that cannot be returned directly to the condenser hotwell and O Supplement 5 3.5-la December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS O THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 1 O
""'" " " "' ' ~'" " " " * " ' " '
O
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS wastes from the reactor coolant system, condensate system, feedwater system, off-gas system drains, and associated auxiliary systems. It also includes low-conductivity wastes from the condensate demineralizer regeneration system (resin transfer and backwash water), and ultrasonic resin cleaning waste. Off-standard process effluents, such as water of relatively high-radioactive concentration, are recycled to the waste collector tank or other appropriate subsystems for reprocessing. Sample analysis will indicate the most appropriate method. 3.5.1.2 Floor Drain Subsystem Potentially high-conductivity wastes in the floor drain subsystem are collected in the floor drain collector tanks. Floor drain waste is either filtered and demineralized or evaporated and demineralized. The wastes come from radwaste building floor sumps, reacter building floor drain sumps, drywell floor drains, turbine building floor drain sumps, laboratory drains, and decontamination area drains. Normally, floor drains will be a source of recoverable water, if not contaminated with chemicals or oil prior to collection. Chemical wastes are normally processed in the waste evaporator or packaged at the point of use. The waste evaporator is a forced-circulating design, with a vertical external reboiler and an overhead rectifying tower. The concentrated bottoms are partially cooled and stored prior to transfer to the waste solidification system for disposal. Evaporator overhead is routed to the waste collector tanks for demineralization prior to reuse as condensate, or to the floor drain collector tanks for reuse as condensate, or to the discharge sample tanks for discharge. The floor drain filter is a flat bed, precoat type, capable of discharging filter cake slurry to the solid radwaste sludge tank for waste solidification. 3.5.1.3 Regenerant Chemical Was:e Subsystem Chemicals resulting from regeneration of condensate demineralizers are collected, neutralized, and sampled in the regenerant waste tank. The neutralized chemical solution (approximately 1 percent solids) is then processed through the regenerant evaporator. Periodically, the evaporator bottoms are partially cooled and directed to the evaporator bottoms tank for storage prior to transfer to the 3.5-2
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS ( TABLE 3.5-6 LWS ANNUAL RELEASE DATA Realistic Basis Assumption Parameter Maximum core thermal power 3,489 MWt Total steam flow rate 1.50x10'lb/hr ls Mass of coolant in reactor 6'015x105 lb pressure vessel , RWCU system flow rate 3.4x105 1b/hr s RWCU filter /demineralizer Type 4 deep-bed resin Size 220 cu ft each Regeneration frequency 1 vessel /1.5 days Regeneration backwash volume 1,482 gal (including solids) Condensate Demivtializers Type , 9 deep-bed resin Size 220 cu ft each Regeneration frequency 1 vessel / week Regeneration backwash volume 22,050 gal per event Condensate demineralizer flow 1.05x107 lb/hr 5 rate Ultrasonic resin rinse volume 15,000 gpd a 4
j -> Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS
,4~
) 3.7 POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS
. r_-'r i The power transmissi6n system consists of a new single-j s circuit 345-kV transmission line extending from Unit 2 to y the new Sdriba Station, and from Scriba Station to Niagara ls
. Mohawk Power Ccrporation's (NMPC) existing Volney Station.
t jThe line iis needed to provide a generator lead from Unit 2 p to the New York Power Pool interconnected electric system. s p The Nine Mile 2-Volney 345-kV transmission line will be constructed adjacent and parallel to an existing transmission facility, along its entire length within an existing right-of-way (ROW). The line will traverse in a southerly direction approximately 15 km (9.4 mi), passing ' through the town of Scriba, and terminating in the town of Volney at the existing Volney Station (Figure 3.7-1). 3.7.1 Basic Electrical Parameters i Designed to operate at a nominal voltage of 345 kV, the line's power conductors will consist of six individual 1,192.5 KCM, steel-reinforced aluminum cables in bundles of two per phase. Spacing of 7.9 m (26 ft) will be provided between phases. Two overhead ground wires will be employed. ("') (s ,/ A minimum maintained over fields and roads, at a temperature of 125*C conductor clearance of 8.5 m (28 ft) will be (257 F). This temperature corresponds to the New York Power Pool short-term emergency transmission line loading criteria. The maximum predicted electric field strength associated with the operation of the proposed transmission line at 1m (3.3 ft) above ground will be <7 kV/m (2.1 kV/ft) over public roads and <11 kV/m (3.4 kV/ft) over all other areas. The predicted electric field strength at 1 m (3.3 ft) above ground at all locations along the eastern edge of the ROW will be <1.6 kV/m (0.49 kV/ft). The predicted sound levels at the edge of the ROW are minimal (approximately 52 dBA) and are consistent with those found on other 345-kV ROWS that are successfully operated by N'4PC and other utilities in the U.S. At Unit 2, the new transmission line will terminate directly at a structure for the high-voltage terminals of the generator step-up transformer. The proposed Scriba Station, which will serve as an intermediate transmission station, will be constructed (n)
\s' Supplement 5 3.7-1 December 1983
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS approximately 305 m (1,000 ft) south of Lake Road and within the ROW for the Nine Mile 2-Volney 345-kV transmission line. Within the Scriba switchyard will be a 345-kV breaker and half transmission station, which will terminate transmission lines from Nine Mile Point Units 1 and 2, plus two transmission lines from Volney Station. One of the Scriba-Volney transmission lines and the transmission line from Unit 2 will be new construction. Also included at Scriba Station will be a 345/115-kV transformer bank, with associated 115-kV equipment, to supply offsite power to Unit 2 and the James A. FitzPatrick Plant via overhead 115-kV transmission lines. After exiting the proposed Scriba Station, the new transmission line will proceed in a southerly direction for 14.35 km (8.9 mi) and terminate at the existing Volney Station. 3.7.2 Basic Structural Design Parameters The principal supporting structures of the proposed Nine Mile 2-Volney 345-kV transmission line will be wood-pole, H-frame structures. Tubular steel poles will be utilized at 5 angle locations. These structure types are illustrated on Figures 3.7-2 and 3.7-3. The foundation material for the wood-pole, H-frame structures will consist of an auger-dug hole, backfilled with crushed stone. Foundations for the s tubular steel pole angle structures will consist of reinforced concrete-drilled cassions. The design standards for the structures of the line (wood or steel) will meet or exceed all requirements of the National Electric Safety Code (NESC) for Grade B construction (1) . The structures will be spaced at intervals on the average of 213 m (700 ft), requiring approximately seven structures per circuit mile. Typical structure height will be approximately 26 m (85 ft), with taller poles installed where necessary to maintain required clearances. Actual spans will vary in length depending upon topographical conditions, with minimum spacinr of approximately 183 m (600 ft) and maximum spacing of approximately 305 m (1,000 ft). The conductor will be 1,192.5 KCM 26/7 aluminum, steel-reinforced conductor containing 26 strands of aluminum and 7 strunds of steel, and will have an overall diameter of 3.3 cm (1.3 in) with an ultimate strength of 15,059 kg (33,200 lb). Six conductors (two per phase) will be Supplement 5 3.7-2 . December 1983
Nina Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS installed on the transmission line. The conductor tension C'4 will be 4,536 kg (10,000 lb) per subconductor under NESC heavy-loading conditions. The overhead ground wire (shield wire) will be 1.12 cm (0.44 in) extra-high-strength, 7-wire galvanized steel strand, which has an ultimate stength of 9,435 kg (20,800 lb). Two overhead ground wires will have a tension of 2,722 kg (6,000 lb) under NESC heavy-loading conditions. The insulator assembly will employ brown-glaze porcelain suspension insulators on wood-cole structures and on tan 8 tubular steel poles and gray glaze on gray tubular steel poles. The insulator design will conform with the appropriate standards of the American National Standards Institute. 3.7.3 Right-of-Way Description The proposed Nine Mile 2-Volney 345-kV transmission line will be part of an er.isting transmission line corridor cccupied by the following lines:
- 1. Nine Mile Point-Clay No. 9 345-kV line.
- 2. Nine Mile Point-Clay No. 8 345-kV line.
() 3. Nine Mile Point-Lighthouse Hill No. 4 115-kV line. Oswego-Nine Mile Point No. 1 115-kV line. 4. The relationship between this corridor and other electric and gas corridors in the region is illustrated on Figure 3.7-4. The existing Unit 2-Volney ROW consists of a fee-owned, 152-m (500-ft) wide corridor (Figure 3.7-5). The existing lines are generally located on the center and western portions of this ROW. There exists, therefore, available area along the eastern edge of the 152-m (500-ft) corridor for the new line. For a distance of approximately 6.45 km (4 mi) south from the Unit 2 site, the-western portion of the existing ROW is occupied by the two 115-kV lines identified previously, which provide offsite power capability to NMPC's Nine Mile Point Unit 1. It has been proposed that the Nine Mile 2-Volney 345-kV line utilize the available area along the eastern edge of the existing corridor for its entire length. The new 345-kV line will directly parallel the two existing 345-kV lines 30.5 m (100 ft) to the east of the eastern most Supplement 5 3.7-3 December 1983 1
i Nine Milo Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 345-kV centerline from Unit 2 to the Volney Station. This alignment will not require acquisition of additional ROW. 3.7.4 Compliance with Local, State, and Federal Regulations In April 1982, NMPC filed an amended application with the New York State Public Service Commission (PSC) for a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need, pursuant to Article VII of the Public Service Law. Certification of the Nine Mile 2-Volney 345-kV transmission line by the PSC is anticipated by April 1983. No other local, state, or federal approvals are required with respect to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed transmission facilities. 3.7.5 Environmental Management and Construction Plans Article VII of the Public Service Law [Part 36.5(3)-86.5(9)] requires information concerning the environmental impact of construction, restoration, and n.anagement of the transmission facility. Details on the environmental impact of construction, restoration, and management of the transmission facility are provided in the Environmental Management and Construction Plan (EM&CP), which was filed with the New York State Public Service Commission in September 1983. A general discussion addressing these requirements is provided in Section 5.6.1.3. Supplement 5 3.7-4 December 1983 O
O in V A "3 St S2 3] ag N o F
- e. C3 y
$ .[ U "T Ak I E b
a l-- s
& h h 2
- E E m o 8 i-x adm o sMAY BE INCREASED y4$
o WHEN CLEARANCE GREATER THAN 33' pgg oNw y IS REQUIRED Sj$ o 5 g 35 o 2 3 z e iii 2 3 0 y NAME PLATE
^ '
c O GROUNDING D N (T,V P) y r 1 r r 1 y FIGURE 3.7-3 345 SINGLE CIRCUlT
- 3 STEEL POLE STRUCTURE TYPE 345 KV ST 1.4 DE-TS-3P NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT S DECEMBER 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS h APPENDIX 7C LIST OF TABLES Table Number Title 7C-1 POPULATION DISTRIBUIION FOR 1980 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS 7C-2 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION FOR 1986 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS 7C-3 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION FOR 1990 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS 7C-4 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION FOR 2000 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS 7C-5 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION FCR 2010 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS 7C-6 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION FOR 2020 ' O- TO 50-MILE RADIUS 7C-7 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION FOR 2030 O- TO 50-MILE RADIUS 7C-8 POPULATION DENSITY FOR 1986 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS 7C-9 POPULATION DENSITY FOR 2030 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS - 7C-10 DELETED 7C-11 DELETED 7C-12 DELETED 7C-13 DELETED 7C-14 DELETED Supplement 5 7C-i December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS APPENDIX 7C LIST OF TABLES (Cont) Table i Number Title 7C-15 DELETED l l 7C-16 DELETED 7C-17 DELETED 7C-18 DELETED 7C-19 DELETED 7C-20 DELETED 7C-21 DELETED 5 7C-22 DELETED 7C-23 DELETED 7C-24 DELETED 7C-25 DELETED 7C-26 DELETED 7C-27 DELETED 7C-28 DELETED Supplement 5 7C-ii December 1983 j
Nine MC.e Point Unit 2 ER-OLS ll APPENDIX 7C POPULATION DISTRIBUTION - CLASS 9 ACCIDENTS , Population distribution within an 80-km (50-mi) radius of Nine Mile Point Unit 2 is listed by distance and direction e in Tables 7C-1 through 7C-7. Population densities are 5 listed in Tables 7C-8 and 7C-9. Figures 7C-1 and 7C-2 show the 16- and 80-km (10- and 50-mi) areas with sector overlays
- corresponding to the tables.
Population distribution between 0 and 6 km (0-3.7 mi) was determined through a door-to-door survey conducted by Stone
& Webster Engineering Corporation on May 9 through 13, 1982.
Population distribution beyond 6 km (3.7 mi) was calculated using the same methods as those described in Section 2.5.1. Data from the 1980 U.S. Census of Population and the 1981 Canadian Census of Population provided the basis for the estimates. 5 O Supplement 5 7C-1 December 1983
s Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS Bibliography
- 1. Bureau of the Census. 1980 Census of Population, Advance Reports, U.S. Department of Commerce, New York, 1981.
- 2. New York Department of Commerce. 1978 Official Population Projections by Age and Sex for New York State Co unti e s*, September 1980.
- 3. Statistics Canada. Interim Population Counts for Census Divisions and Census Subdivisions, 1981, Ottawa, Canada, 1982.
- 4. Statistics Canada. Population: Geographic Distributions. 1976 Census, Census Divisions and Subdivisions: Ontario, Ottawa, Canada, June 1977. -
- 5. Envirodata Corp. Digitized Maps of Area Within 50 Miles of Nine Mile Point, 1982.
- 6. Ministry of Treasury and Economics, Central Statistical 5
Services, Ontario: Population Projections by Regions and Counties for Years 1981, 1986, 1996, 2001. Toronto, Canada, February, 1979.
- 7. Ministry of Treasury and Economics, Central Statistical Services, Ontario: Population Projections for Counties of 10,000 Population and Over (in 1976) 1981, 1986, 1991, 1996, 2003 (Concluded). Toronto, Canada, April 1980.
- 8. Statistics Canada, 1976 Final Population, 1981 Population and Dwellings, Canada, Provinces, Census Divisions and Subdivisions. Ottawa, Canada, 1982.
Supplement 5 7C-2 December 1983 O
f% s \ Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-1 POPULATION DISTRIT!UTION FOR 1980 0- TO 50-MILE FADIUS l5 Distance (mi) 0.0- 0.5- 1.0- 1.5- 2.0- 2.5- 3.0- 3.5- 4.0- 4.5- 5.0- 6.0- 7.0- 8.5-Direction Q,1_ 1.0 Li. 2J L1,. LR_. L.1_ ILD._ hjL h,(L 6.J._ LS D 1_ lQ D Total N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O l NNE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ! NE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O E O O 3 21 30 13 0 53 136 127 96 0 421 220 1,120 LSE O O 8 24 55 13 74 96 118 123 364 158 193 1,618 2,844 SE O O O 45 50 82 65 66 13 44 197 79 131 180 952 SSE O O O 25 101 87 17 109 249 110 115 107 191 176 1,287 S 0 0 0 7 45 22 81 132 60 56 176 212 229 217 1,237 SSW 0 0 8 4 36 75 147 146 196 180 436 172 758 1,817 3,975 SW 0 0 44 38 32 28 51 126 160 272 2,904 8,959 7,081 1,765 21,460 WSW 0 0 0 16 2 8 0 8 4 0 3 491 1,106 954 2,592 l5 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,467 Total 0 0 63 180 351 328 435 736 936 912 4,291 10,178 10,110 6,947 l5 Supplement 5 1 of 2 December 1983
[] [' /^N
\
\.) / ,
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-1 (Cont) Distance (mil Total 12.5-15,0 15.0-17.5 17.5-20.0 20.0-25.0 25.0-30.0 30. 0- 35J 317.0-40.0 40.0-45.0 45.0-50.0 0-50,0 Direction 10,0-12J N O O O O O O 24 341 1,699 25,985 28,049 l O O O 42 956 771 23614 1,604 4 2,799 2,801 14,337 NNE O 56 396 711 1,911 3,872 2,199 21,085 15,3f94 6,910 52,489 NE ENE 232 2,282 1,061 2,130 879 449 242 176 1,086 5,554 14,091 703 1 , 3843 729 760 1,393 758 421 615 1,086 1,895 10,823 E ESE 1,024 1,069 1,210 881 1,5fe9 1,976 3,518 5,103 11,287 22,726 53,187 SE 899 1,151 1,880 2,320 6,489 7,246 9,746 10,058 19,254 17,549 77,544 S$E 1,242 1,368 1,976 2,698 26,358 48,390 132,885 141,059 20,648 7,100 385,011 S 1,546 14,068 2,712 2,511 8,470 15,181 22,645 16,621 25,329 4,750 115,070 SSW 1,687 1,403 1,891 1,259 2,060 3,347 6,201 6,165 19,616 20,648 68,252 S SW 1,482 1,234 767 929 3,121 4,062 3,541 7,089 9,583 18,091 71,359 W5W 0 0 0 0 31 1,104 4 4,286 6,196 4 10,308 25,'32 15 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 624 323 1487 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 233 1,221 7,309 8,763 fW 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 211 2,819 3,030 NNW ( 8,830 23,974 12,622 14,241 53,186 86,083 185,190 217,435 135,828 154,768 927,624 Totals Supplement 5 2 or 2 December 1983
O O O Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-2 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION FOR 1986 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS l5 Distance fail 1.0- 1.5- 2.0- 2.5- 3.0- 3.5- 4.0- 4.5- 5.0- 6.0- 7.0- 8.5-0.0- 0.5-Direction n O 1.0 h 2_ O_ h h h h h id._ h h h IQ.a Total O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NME O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ENE O O O O 3 23 33 15 0 58 150 141 107 0 467 244 1,241 l E O O 9 27 61 14 82 107 131 136 403 175 214 '1,791 3,150 f ESE O 89 72 73 15 49 218 87 146 199 1,054 SE O O O 50 56 18 120 276 122 128 '118 211 194 1,422 SSE O O O 27 112 96 O O 8 50 24 90 146 66 62 195 235 254 240 1,370 S O 83 163 162 217 199 483 191 840' 2,012 4,403 SSW 0 0 9 4 40 56 140 177 302 3.216 9,923 7,842 1.956 23,769 SW 0 0 49 42 35 31 2 9 0 9 4 0 3 544 1,224 1,057 2,870 l5 WSW O O O 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 O O O O D 0 0 0 0 0 0 MW O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NNW O O O O O Total 0 0 70 199 389 361 481 815 1,036 1,011 4,753 11,273 11,198 7,693 39,279 'l5 l l f Supplement 5 i or 2 ecem W N l-l l L w
O O O j
.Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-2 (Cont)
Distance [ mil Total 15.0-17.5 17,5-?_0_,9 20.0-25.0 25.0-30.0 30.0-35.0 35.0-40.0 40.0-45.0 45.0-50.0 0-50.0 Dirceflon 10.0-12 5 12.5-15.0 O O O O O O 24 552 1,762 26,337 28,475 N O O 43 990 797 2,443 4,760 2,895 2,895 .14,823 NNE O 62 428 739 1,976 4,002 2,274 21,798 15,890 7,162 54,331 NE O 2,528 1,173 2,359 963 482 259 185 1,155 5.898 15,259 ENE 257 841 1,542 836 440 635 1,130 1,972 11,713 E 778 1.489 809 1,133 1,341 977 1,715 2,157 3,556 5,103 11,293 22,738 54,348 ESE 1,135 1,275 2,082 2,569 7,141 7.648 10,274 10,679 20,778 18,925 83,420 SE 995 1,515 2,188 2,983 27,775 50,483 138,635 147,163 21,544 7,426 402,510 SSE 1,376 15,581 3,005 2,780 8,837 15,827 23,593 17,204 25,850 4,863 120,622 S 1,712 1,869 1,554 2,094 1,371 2,092 3,393 6,317 6,281 19,807 20,319 69,500 SSW 5 1,346 802 .942 3,220 4,270 3,727 7,459 10,058 19,090 76,324 SW 1,641 0 0 0 0 32 1,478 4,510 6,837 10,849 26,592 WSW 16 O O O O O O O O W O O O O O O O O O O 168 331 499 WNW O 0 0 0 0 240 1,253 7,504 8,997 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 2,904 3,120 NNW 0 0 0 13,922 15,604 56,251 89,927 193,020 226,369 140,636 159,213 970,533 Totals 9,779 26,533 2 of 2 December 1983 Supplement 5
Nino Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-3 POPULATION DISTFIBUTION TOR 1990 l5 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS i Distance (mi) 0.0- 0.5- 1.0- 1.5- 2.0- 2.5- 3.0- 3.5- 4.0- 4.5- 5.0- 6.0- 7.0- 8.5-Direction QJ._ L_Q L.3 _ Z,.9_. 2J_ id_ ld L.D.,_ L.3 LD ft.d_. L.9_ D.d ID A TotaI { 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O l h o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ENE O O O 4 25 36 16 0 63 162 151 115 0 501 261 1,334 E ESE o 0 10 29 65 15 88 115 141 146 432 188 230 1,924 3.383 O O O 53 60 97 77 78 16 52 234 94 156 214 1,131 SE SSE O O O 29 120 103 20 129 297 131 137 127 228 209 1,530 S O O O 8 54 26 96 157 71 67 209 252 273 258 1,471 10 43 89 175 173 233 214 519 205 903 2,161 4,730 SSW 0 0 5 38 33 60 150 190- 323 3,454 10,657 8,423 2,100 25,525 SW 0 0 52 45 WSW 0 0 0 19 2 10 0 10 5 0 3 584 1,315 1,135 3,083 l8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 O O O O O O O O O O O NW O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 Total 0 0 76 213 418 389 516 875 1,115 1,084 5,103 12,107 12,029 8,262 46,187 l5 Supplement 5 1 or 2 December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-3 (Cont) Distance imites) Total 20.0-25.0 25.0-30.0 30.0-35.0 35.0-40.0 40.0-45.0 45.0-50.0 0-50.,0 Direction 10.0-12A 12,5-l hD 15.0-17.5 17.5-20.0 N O O O O O O 25 363 1,811 27,176 29,375 NNE O O O 44 1,017 820 2,513 4,893 2,977 2,978 15,242 NE o 67 453 761 2,032 4,115 2,340 22,416 16,352 7,373 55,909 277 2,715 1,261 2,532 1,027 508 273 195 1,205 6,151 16,144 ENE 836 1,599 869 903 1,657 896 458 655 1,166 2,037 12,410 E 1,218 1,271 1,439 1,047 1,842 2,299 3,626 5,169 11,437 23,030 55,761 ESE SE 1,069 1,370 2,236 2,760 7,645 8,025 10,777 11,259 22,117 20,130 88,519 SSE 1,478 1,627 2,350 3,200 29,117 52,652 144,589 153,485 22,468 7,755 420,251 1,839 16,735 3,228 2,984 9,214 16,493 24,570 17,783 26,283 4,965 125,565 5 S SSW 2,007 1,669 2,249 1,855 8 2,113 3,423 6,396 6,363 19,927 20,148 70,480 SW 1,762 1,433 827 949 3,294 4,435 3,871 7,748 10,432 19,869 80.145 WSW 17 0 0 0 0 34 1,536 4,685 7,103 11,271 27,729 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 335 505 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 242 1,265 7,572 9,079 NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 219 2,912 3,131 10,503 28,486 14,912 16,635 58,958 93,700 200,974 235,256 144,932 163,702 1,010,245 Totsis l l Supplement 5 2 of 2 December 1983
O 4 Niree Nile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE TC-4 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION FOR 2000 S. 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS l Distance imi) 4.5- 5.0- 6.0- 7.0- 8.5-0"Il- 0.5- 1.0- 1.5- 2.0- 2.5- 3.0- 3.5- 4.0-L_Q, R 1Q, Q Total D i rec t ion Q,.fi _ 1.0 Q R h L_0Q h. 4.0 Li_ L_0_ h O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NNE O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NE o 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O 4 28 41 18 0 71 184 173 131 0 572 299 1,521 j E 18 101 131 161 167 494 214 262 2,197 3,864 l ESE O O 11 33 75 O O 61 68 111 87 89 18 59 268 107 178 244 1,290 SE O 118 23 148 338 150 151 144 259 239 1,747 SSE o 0 0 34 137 110 179 81 76 239 288 311 294 1,680 S 0 0 0 10 62 30 0 0 11 5 49 101 200 198 266 244 592 234 1,031 2,468 5.399 SSW 38 69 171 217 370 3,944 12,167 9,616 2,398 29,144 SW 0 0 60 51 43 WSW 0 0 0 22 ? 11 0 11 5 0 4 667 1,501 1,296 3,520l 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 86 244 478 445 590 998 1,270 1,239 5,829 13,821 13,730 9,435 48,165 l 5 1 or 2 December 1983 Supplement 5 l l l
V s v Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-4 (Cont) Disignce fmil Total Direction 10.0-12.5 12.5-15.0 15.0-17.5 17.5-20.0 20.0-25.0 25.0-30.0 30.0-35.0 35.0-40.0 M.0-45.0 45.0-50.0 0-50.0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 361 1,824 27,272 29,482 o 0 0 44 1,014 817 2,506 4,881 2,970 2,971 15,203 NNE O 76 493 767 2,026 4,104 2,333 22,364 16,341 7,378 55,032 NE 2,888 1,150 549 289 199 1,240 6,334 17,504 ENE 315 3.100 1,440 954 1,824 991 1,031 1,890 1,019 479 664 1,188 2,074 13,635 E 1,392 1,451 1,645 1,196 2,104 2,583 3,658 5,125 If,340 22,833 57,191 ESE 1,221 1,562 2,553 3,150 8,676 8.756 11,714 12,231 24,172 21,893 97,218 SE SSE 1,687 1,857 2,683 3,646 31,719 56,769 155,897 165,485 24.225 8,371 454,086 2,099 19,104 3,684 3,404 9,936 17,765 26,447 18,985 27,539 5,226 135,869 S
?,292 1,905 2,568 1,635 2,199 3,559 6,703 6,677 20,597 20,236 73,770 SSW 2,012 1,615 891 984 3,531 4,905 4,288 8,583 11,511 21,979 89,443 SW 20 0 0 0 0 37 1,700 5.189 7,865 12,479 30,810 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 W
WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 336 506 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 243 1,271- 7,607 9,121 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 219 2,926 3,145 NNW 11,992 32,494 16,948 18,745 64,245 100,863 216,039 250,987 152,472 169,915 1,082,865 Totals 7 Supplement 5 2 of 2 December 1983
O O O Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-5 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION FOR 2010 5 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS Distance (mi) 0.0- 0.5- .1.0- 1.5- 2.0- 2.5- 3.0- 3.5- 4.0- 4.5- 5.0- 6.0- 7.0- 8.5-Direction A O L O_ h 2 1 h LO h b_0_ bL LfL M L.[L Q IQJ Total f4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ENE o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E O O 5 33 47 21 0 83 214 200 152 0 665 347 1,767 ESE O O 13 33 87 21 117 152 187 194 574 249 304 2,552 4,488 SE O O O 71 79 128 101 104 21 69 311 124 207 284 1,499 SSE O O O 40 160 137 27 172 393 174 181 169 301 278 2,032 S 0 0 0 11 71 35 128 208 95 88 278 334 362 342 1,952 SSW 0 0 13 6 57 118 232 231 309 .284 688 271 1,197 2,867 6,273 SW 0 0 69 60 51 44 80 198 252 429 4,581 14,135 11,173 2,786 33,858 WSW 0 0 0 25 3 13 0 13 6 0 4 775 1,744 1,505 4,088 15 W O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 100 284 555 517 685 1,161 1,477 1,438 6,769 16,057 15,953 10,961 55,957 l3 Supplement 5 1 of 2 December 1983
o J v Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-5 (cont)
' Distance.(miles 5 Total 25.0-30.0 30.0-35.0 35.0-40.0 '40.0-45.0 45.0-50.0 0-50.0 Direction 10.0-12.5 12.5-15.0 15.0-17,5 17.5-20.0 20.0-25.0 O O O 26 373 1,875 30,382 32,656 N O O O 1,043 841 2,580 5,024 3,056 1,058 15,647 NNE O O O 45 2,085 4,225 2,401 23,022 16,833 7,607 57,612 NE o 89 552 798 3,353 1,314 609 316 209 1,297 6,632 19,369 ENE 366 3,600 1,673 1,198 2,196 1,181 522 697 1,246 2,176 15,366 E 1,110 2,121 1,152 1,389 7,442 2,971 3,902 5,400 11,948 24,056 61,808 ESE 1,617 1,686 1,909 3,661 10,061 10,026 13,394 14,025 27,827 25,092 111,785 SE 1,418 1,816 2,966 1,960 2,157 3,117 4,234 36,299 64,745 177,797 188,734 27,627 9,555 518 257 SSE 5
3,953 11,306 20,219 30,043- 21,142 29,246 5,616 152,392 S 2,439 22,195 4,281 1,864 2,281 3,686. 7,020 7.014 21,233 20,558 77,789 SSW 2,662 2,214 2,984 1,018 3,808 5,493 4,809 9,627 12,873 24,655 101,294 SW 2,337 1,849 967 0 42 1,909 5,821 8,823 13,999 34,704 WSW 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 325 490 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 235 1,231 7,331 8,797 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 207 2,706 2,913 NNW 0 0 0 0 19,601 21,513 72,835 114,038 244,718 281,323 165,487 183,748 1,210,879 Totals 13,912 37,727 2 or 2 December 1983 Supplement 5
I
' v Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FR-OLS TABLE 7C-6 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION FOR 2020 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS l5 Distance f ail 1.0- 1.5- 2.0- 2.5- 3.0- 3.5- 4.0- 4.5- 5.0- 6.0- 7.0- 8.5-0.0- 0.5- Total Direction OA Lp_ Q Q Q Q Q L.O Q Q Q J_d_ Q Jgg 1
O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O q 0 0 0 i NNE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NE O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENE 0 0 0 24 0 96 247 231 175 0 767 401 2,039 E O O 5 38 55 24 135 175 215 223 662 287 351 2,945 5,177 ESE O O 15 44 101 O 82 91 148 118 120 24 80 359 143 239 327 1,731 SE O O 31 199 453 201 210 194 348 320 2,344 SSE O O O 46 184 158 0 0 13 82 40 147 240 109 102 320 386 417 395 2,251 S 0 268 266 357 328 793 313 1,360 3,307 7,236 SSW 0 0 15 7 66 136 229 291 495 5,285 16,304 12,886 3,212 39,053 SW 0 0 80 69 58 51 93 4,717 WSW 0 0 0 29 4 15 0 15 7 0 5 894 2,012 1,736 l5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O NNW O O O O O O 7,809 18,521 18,400 12,643 64,548 Total 0 0 115 328 641 596 792 1,340 1,703 1,660 l5 1 of 2 December 1983 Supplement 5
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-6 (Cont) Distance _[ mil . Total l Di rect ion 10.0-1;M 12.5-15.0 15.0-17.5 17.5-20.0 20.0-25.0 25.0-30.0 30.0-35.0 35.0-40.0 10.0-45.0 4 15.0-50.0 4 0-50,0 1 O O O O O O 26 381 1,910 3 ts ,863 37,180 N O O O 47 1,068 861 2,639 5,140 3,127 3,128 16,010 NNE O 102 616 824 2,133 4,323 2,457 23,552 17,227 7,788 59,022 NE 422 4,153 1,930 3,866 1,494 674 3414 215 1,336 6,829 21,263 ENE 1,279 2,1144 41 1,328 1,382 2,533 1,360 571 732 1,302 2,274 17,24f4 E 1,86f4 1,945 2 , 2 014 1,602 2,819 3.402 1,249 4 5,821 12,879 25,'933 67,895 ESE 1,635 2,095 3,421 f,222 11,608 11,601 15,f82 4 16,219 32,117 28,821 128,952 SE 4 2,261 2,489 3,595 4,885 42,005 74,977 205,394 218,560 31,99'4 11,064 600,068 SSE 2,813 25,601 4,938 4,558 13,061 23,364 34,654 23,884 31,342 6,101 172,567 5 S 3,071 2,553 3,441 2,118 2,375 3,831 7,387 7,409 21,992 21,252 82,665 SSW 2,108 1,051 1,056 4,135 6,194 5,431 10,868 14,498 27,801 114,891 SW 2,696 0 0 0 0 47 2,154 6,569 9,959 15,804 30,277 WSW 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W WNW O O O O O O O O 154 304 158 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 220 1,148 6,780 8,148 l NW 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 183 2,314 2,497 l NNW 0 16,068 13,490 22,524 24,560 83,231 130,63t4 281.288 319,570 181,168 201,056 1,368,137 Totals 4 Supplement 5 2 of 2 December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-7 POPULATION DISIRIBUTION FOR 2030 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS 5 Distance (mi) l 0.0- 0.5- 1.0- 1.5- 2.0- 2.5- 3.0- 3.5- 4.0- 4.5- 5.0- 6.0- 7.0- 8.5- l Direction 01 1.0 Li_ 2.0 2 1 Lp_ L1_ LL Q L_0__ 0 6m_. 7.0 Q 10.0 Total l N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NhE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O E O O 6 44 63 28 0 110 284 265 201 0 880 460 2,341 ESE o 0 17 30 115 27 155 201 214 7 256 759 329 402 3,380 5,938 SE O O O 94 105 171 135 137 27 91 412 165 274 375 1,986 SSE O O O 52 211 182 35 228 520 230 214 0 222 399 367 2,686 S 0 0 0 15 94 46 169 276 125 117 368 443 478 453 2,584 SSW 0 0 17 8 73 157 307 305 409 376 911 359 1,585 3,795 8,304 SW 0 0 92 79 67 58 106 2614 334 568 6,067 18,715 114,793 3,688 44,831 l WSW 0 0 0 33 4 17 0 17 8 0 5 1,026 2,309 1,993 5,412 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 VNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total O o 132 375 734 686 907 1,538 1,9584 1,903 8,963 21,259 21,120 114,511 74,082 l5 l l l Supplement 5 1 of 2 December 198 l l
% m I ,%
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-7 (Cont) Distance fail Total Direction 10.0-12.5 12.5-15.0 15.0-17.5 17.5-20.0 20.0-25.0 25.0-30.0 30.0-35.0 35.0-40.0 40.0-45.0 45.0-50.0 0-50.0 N O O O O O O 27 390 1,938 40,990 43,345 NNE O O O 45 1,093 881 2,699 5,257 3,198 3,199 16,375 NE O 118 686 853 2,182 4,421 2,513 24,095 17,621 7,965 60,454 ENE 485 4,768 2,215 4,435 1,696 744 374 219 1,361 6,965 23,262 E 1,468 2,806 1,525 1,587 2,909 1,560 631 772 1,364 2,378 19,341 ESE 2,139 2,233 2,529 1,840 3,235 3,891 4,712 6,417 14,201 28,594 75,729 SE 1,877 2,404 3,926 4.846 13,351 13,518 18,034 18,883 37,203 33,237 149,265 SSE 2,595 2,856 4,127 5,610 48,978 87,730 240,924 255,743 37,436 12,937 701,622 s S 3,229 29,388 5,667 5,230 15,243 27,281 40,395 27,277 33,841 6,686 196,821 SSW 3,526 2,930 3,951 2,401 2,477 3,992 7,799 7,856 22,848 22,302 88,386 SW 3,095 2,394 1,144 1,096 4,508 7,006 6,150 12,307 16,389 31,433 130,353 WSW 31 0 0 0 0 53 2,438 7,441 11,278 17,897 44,550 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 270 407 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 196 1,023 5,943 7,162 NNW O O O O O O O O 148 1,737 1,885 Totals 18,445 49,897 25,770 27,946 95,672 151,077 326,696 366,853 199,986 222,533 1,558,957 Supplement 5 2 of 2 December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TACLE 7C-8 POPULATION DENSITY FOR 1986 0- TO 50-MILE RADIUS Distance ( ml] 3.5- 6.0- 8.5-0.0- 0.5- 1.0- 1.5- 2.0- 2.5- 3.0- 4.0- 4.5- 5.0- I.0-Direction L3_ la_ L3_ 2.0 A 2 .LfL L3_ L O__ 4,5 L OL 6.0 7.0 A 8 109 Ave rale O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ENE E O O 13 81 115 138 0 3,412 7,500 1,226 451 0 160 52 139 O O 37 79 132 26 130 146 158 146 187 69 47 329 162 ESE SE O O O 146 127 165 113 99 18 53 101 34 32 37 55 SSE O O O 79 254 178 28 163 131 131 119 99 46 36 85 S o 0 0 23 113 44 141 198 79 66 90 92 56 44 71 5 SSW 0 0 37 12 91 154 255 220 260 213 224 75 184 369 227 0 200 122 79 57 86 190 212 333 1,495 4,339 1,718 359 1,242 SW 0 WSW 0 0 0 126 15 49 0 50 73 0 150 4,000 1,819 912 1,099 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW Ave rage 0 0 72 80 127 102 126 177 204 178 392 815 361 200 315 Supplement 5 1 of 2 December 1983 l l l l
. - _ - - - . . _ . - . . _-... .~ .- -.. - . - ~ , _ . .
O > 0 l } , Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-8 (Cont) 4 Distanco (mil i Ave rage j Direction 10.0-12.5 12.5-15.0 15.0-17.5 17.5-20.0 20.0-25.0 2L O-30,0 30.0-35.0 L O-40.0 14 0.0-145.0 45.0-50.0 0-50.0 l N O O O O O O 21 20 39 626 268 1 NNE O O O 34 34 38 65 95 37 37 50 f l NE O 55 45 14 14 45 74 36 296 190- 77 124 ENE 70 200 7 84 128 22 11 14 3 14 65 35 E 72 110 51 184 37 17 7 9 14 21 25 i ESE 103 88 84 58 51 10 4 56 73 139 214 6 115 I SE 90 95 131 140 178 233 322 222 262 208 208 l 1 l SSE 125 112 137 162 653 977 2,308 2,018 259 80 884 0 , 4 i j S 159 1, 2147 189 154 221 309 370 2 314 352 61 263 i SSW 169 115 131 714 17 4 614 108 87 274 2141 150 i SW 152 104 63 78 97 86 63 101 121 205 166 5 WSW 1848 0 0 0 0 57 473 178 16? 195 205 1 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 } WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 314 33 1 ] NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 29 97 70 ) NNW D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 58 51 f Totals 122 2149 1 014 100 1843 195 339 312 149 142 201 2 l I i I l j Supplement 5 2 of 2 December 1983 r i 1
. . ___ _, .. _ _ . _ . _ . . - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _~ . - - _ - . . . . _ _ . - _
~
I \ ( J i 1
} Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS I
i 3 TABLE 7C-9 1 I POPULATION DENSITY FOR 2030 0- TO $0-MILE RADIUS 4 Distance (ml) 3 0.0- 0.5- 1. 0- - 1.5- 2.0- 2.5- 3.0- 3.5- 4.0- 4.5- 5.0- 6.0- 7.0- 8.5-j D i rec t i on h 1,0 LjL, 2.dL 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 6.0 7.0 Q 1Q2) Average N O O O *$0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNE O O O O O- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I NE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 ,
! E O O 25 155 219 257 0 6,471 14,200 2,304 848 0 302 98 262 .,;
4 ESE O O 69 146 260 50 246 275 297 274 351 129 88 620 306 SE O O O 274 238 317 212 186 32 98 191 65 60 69 103 , SSE O O O 151 478 337 55 310 623 247 223 185 87 67 160 ; 4 j S 0 0 0 44 213 85 265 375 150 125 170 174 105 83 135 s l t SSW 0 0 69 23 170 291 481 414 490 403 422 141 347 696 427 i l SW 0 0 375 230 152 107 166 359 400 626 2,821 8,183 3,240 677 2,342 , WSW G 0 0 231 29 93 0 95 145 0 250 7,544 3,431 1,832 2,072 V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l j NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i j NMW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i Ave ra ge 0 0 136 151 239 194 237 334 385 335 739 1,537 682 377 594 i ( Supplement 5 1 of 2 December 1983 l 1
&tf *t>&@
d*g
/
IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3)
///// g, k//
l.0 l#m an 9 m $ =2 2 cw l,l h,M !!!b
~
~
1.8 l 1.25 I.6 l 1.4_ 150mm > 4 4 6" > h,i /Aa
+Q)4
+*4* ,
/ <
+
_x -_ - -
$9 o b IMAGE EVALUATION [ g[ddg,g' k/// i>Tk/
y
/v,> g TEST TARGET (MT-3)
& ff, 1.0 d EM M p @ 3E i,i s in N e 1.8 I.25 I.4 1.6
< 150mm ~*
6" # 4
- I
%% +<$ +
hf>et ,, '4d.,;+[
^}
i i Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS i TABLE 7C-9 (Cont) i Distance (mil 10.0- 12.5- 15.0- 17.5- 20.0- 25.0- 30.0- 35.0- 40.0- 45.0- Ave rage
, Di rect i on 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 25,0 3 ') . 0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50 0 0 *)0,Q N O O O O O O 2fs 23 42 975 409 NNE O O O 37 37 42 72 105 41 41 56 ; NE O 104 72 51 49 82 39 327 211 86 138 ENE 132 377 139 241 38 17 6 3 17 77 '53 "
I i E 135 208 96 90 70 31 10 10 16 25 41 i
; ESE 194 165 159 109 95 72 75 92 174 310 161 1
170 246 263 333 411 566 393 469 365 372 SE 179 SSE 235 212 259 305 1,151 1,698 4,011 3,506 450 139 1,464 S 301 2,352 357 290 381 535 633 371 460 83 429
) ! SSW 319 217 248 130 56 79 133 108 316 265 191 SW 286 186 90 91 135 142 103 167 196 337 283 l WSW 288 0 0 0 0 94 780 294 268 3 P'. 344 li w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 28 27 1
NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 24 77 56 l NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 35 31 i j Ave ra ge 229 468 192 179 243 328 575 505 211 198 323 i i l i ] Supplement 5 2 of 2 December 1983 l I s 4
e 5 3 8 9 1 r e b m e c e D D E T E L E D S L N O E
- E R B E
S 2 A H t 0 i 1 E n - G U C A 7 P t n E S i L I o B H P A T T e N l i O M N O e I T in A N M R O F N I E H T 5 t n e m l e p p u S I
9 4 l Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-11 I i 1 i l 2 l 1 1 i i 1 5 l THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. 1 a 1 t l I ! Supplement 5 December 1983 j I i l
t I i G O O ' a >
).
1 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-12 e .A
'l 1
t i I i 4 i THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. 5 l i l f l t Supplement 5 December 1983 r
- O O G Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-13 i
4 j I 1 l I THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. 5 t l l i l i i i l i Supplement 5 December 1983 ! 6 i --- i
1 , ' . 5 - 3 8 9 9 1 r . e b m e c e D D E T E L E D - S L N O E
- E R B E
S 2 A H t 4 i 1 E n - G U C A 7 P t n E S i L I o B H P A T T e N l i O M N _ - e O I n T N A M R O F - N I E H T 5 t n e m le p p u S lq jii!!. j ,1 iI(1 n1i il!l:1I .! !1l1llil,
i . Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS r l TABLE 7C-15 i l a i I ] ! I l t i Tile INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE ilAS BEEN DELETED. 5 , i l 1 1 I i 1 1 2 1 ; l i i Supplement 5 December 1983 i , l 4 I i l _ . .- _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
]
4 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS i j TABLE 7C-16 i a ] 1 .l 1 ? 5 4 1 J i t 1 i 5 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. I l l i ) Supplement 5 December 1983
1 4 ) i i Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS ) TABLE 7C-17 1 l THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. 5 I l l i ! Supplement 5 December 1983 ( l
i l Nine Mile Foint Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-18 , 1 l t i l l l 5 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. l l i Supplement 5 December 1983 1 ! 2 i i
1 1
} 'l Nine Mile Point Unit ? ER-OLS l
l TABLE 70-19 j 1 4 l l t a l i I 5 ) THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. l 8 1 l l l l l l Supplement 5 December 1983 l l I l
4 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 7C-20 i i e I ] I i 1 4 1 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. 5 i i, I i I l l l l l Supplement 5 December 1983 , l
i 1 l 5 ? Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS i TABLE 7C-21 1 l l I i l t i 5 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. l I < i, l i I i l l l l l Supplement 5 December 1983
3 8 9 1 _ r e b m _ e c _ D e D f T E L E D S L N O E
- E R B E
S 2 A H t 2 i 2 E n - G U C A 7 P t n E S i L I o B H P A T T e N l O _. i M N _ O e I n T . i A N M R O F N I E H T 5 t n e m l e p _ p u S IJ
.I(13 ii); }i!
1 l l O O O l l 1 Hine Mile Point Unit 2 Eh-OLS i TABLE 7C-23 l \ 5 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. 1 4 I i i l Supplement 5 December 1983
d
- G G G i i
?
i Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS , i TABLE 7C-214 I l , i l : I i i i l THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. 5 B i > c l l 1 i I
?
I t Supplement 5 December 1963 f i i t. r I i _ _______.._r m. . . - , . _ _ _ _,, _ e- , . , , . _ . . . - _ . , _ , _ . , _ , _ .my ,,c.. .., , , , ,, __,., ,_ - - -_
1 i i O O O l i I J Nino Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS ! l i TABLE 7C-25 1 I 1 l THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. 5 i l l Supplement 5 December 1983 L l . , - . - - - . . .. . - - _
i- - . . -
! O i
d Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS t i TABLE 7C-26 } 5 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. l l i 1 I i I l I , i l l l i Supplement 5 December 1983 '
. - - - . - . - - . . - - . - . . - . . - - - - . . - . - - . . - ~ - - - - . . - . . - . - . . - - . . . .- . . . . . . - . - . . . _ _ . - _ . . . . . . . _ - - -
1 O O O Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS l TABLE 7C-27 i I l I l Tif E INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED. 5 l 1 I Supplement 5 December 1983
.-__.__...-.-.__.._..,_...-._.-._____._.._._.,--._k
G O O 1 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS I l TABLE 7C-28 L t l l I i l t i. t i t i THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS DEEN DELETED. l 5 t I i l l t f I l t I t i I i Supplement 5 December 1983 l i i I i
O s 3
?
,c uts ]
.. m p 3g 3 Si
' [ '
'y E
- ~ f
( RICHLAND
)
l \ I I
\
' \
A ; \ he'.'.,'o ~ Ai::llbi j j/n E % y
*S* f \ h A V E I E 5E
~
......s
,( /
/ f x
~,
H. SCRD l l
! / M E xic0
. ' hx i
\ / s i 'rs 's I f
5* ' cx . __ ______a
- /
p s 3 os*Eoo ) N s f s 1 8 '7 I / ssE
' - - - - - - - __ _ _ _ _ lus ._ _ _ /
s
/ P A L ER MO
/
v0L NE Y ) /
/ /
/ /
k / T / / l
/
& 4i $
' 4. ( a ., v. r .
1 FIGURE 7C-1 0-10 MILE POPULATION ROSE NlAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATlON NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT S DECEMBER 1983
FRONTENAC CO s H ASTINGS \ C O. \ D NGTON \ \
^^ '- ~
C O. N N g NNE h J F E R S O N CO. / NW ~ PRINCE RIN
/ q NE EDWARD CO L_ N j ,e E ARBBA ~ f ofertown
/ N ,,
/ / /
i (( p-
/ \ g E 0 VIN C E ONT RI '
l\ . ENE
- ~4 s
/ j 4r / - - - - x l\
\ r -
'LE IS CO.
CANA A/ /, -' - ~
's- g
- - - - - . - - - _ __ _/_/ , r W j , ,
I soui 43 40 3s i 30 as i zo -
\\{i I
o ire i2 s is as
!i, !
A i st ~
/
E kp,E
\ \
\
>\'
x
/ 0 W 0- ' C O.
f/ [.f \ lN
'\
\0 // C i
i x f O N,,ElO
\
\
~
v S* \ 'N / ONE/B
't e "
R rne I
,4 i
gi YUGA - j , 4 \ s
) A L _ _- , x y i t oyoAs -
y j ~, s l - ,r - > ' S ,x sev ' '
~ -
ONTARIO O. IS E '
/
C Aubur ONONDA A CO SE I
. Conando quo D k I o r/ c o M SON CC g Senecol. l LA t___._.
Geneva ohs ; SS' I _,_. _ __S S S 0 10 20 t t 1 SCALE - MILES FIGURE 7C-2 50 MILE POPULATION ROSE k- NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 5 DECEMBER 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS i QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES O ~ Question Supplement
' Series Number Number E100 - -
E240 E240.1 5 E240.2 2 i E240.3 1 E240.4 5 E240.5 3
, E240.6 2 i
j E290 E290.1 2 i E290.2 2 E290.3 2
, E290.4 2
- E290.5 2 j E291 E291.1 3 i
E291.2 1 E291.3 2 E291.4 1 E291.5 2 l E291.6 2 E291.7 4 E291.8 1 E291.9 3 i E291.10 1 E291.11 2 E291.12 2 E291.13 3 E291.14 3 E291.15 2 !
- E291.16 2 i E291.17 2 E291.18 2
, E291.20 2 { E291.21 4 l E291.22 4 E310 E310.1 1 , E310.2 1 E310.3 2 , E310.4 2 E310.5 2 E310.6 2 E320 E320.1 3 E320.2 3 E320.3 2 1 ' Supplement 5 EQR-i December 1983 i i e,- v, . - , - , , ,+ ----w,, v.---..,,,-a- -,-,ww,me,,, .w-_. , , _ ,n__- -a,m,-,v,---,-,..ww.em - . c ,,- = --- - . - --,
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES (CONT) O Question Supplement Series Number Number E450 E450.1 2 E450.2 2 E450.3 2 E450.4 4 E451 E451.1 3 E451.2 2 E451.3 2 E451.4 2 E451.5 2 E451.6 2 E451.16(a) 4 E451.16(b) 4 E451.17 4 E451.18 5 E460 E460.25 5 E470 E470.1 2 E470.2 2 E470.3 4 E470.4 4 E470.5 4 E470.6 4 1 l l l I Ol Supplement 5 EQR-ii December 1983
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS QUESTION E240.1 (3.3) Update the water use data (including temperature in Table 3.3-1) to include historical meteorologic and hydrologic data recorded up to calendar year 1082 (or for as recently as available data will. permit).
RESPONSE
The water use data (Table 3.3-1) is being updated, using current meteorological and hydrological data, and will be provided in an ER-OLS supplement during the first quarter of s 1984. O l l b l l Supplement 5 Q&R E240.1-1 December 1983 L
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS QUESTION E240.4 (7.1) Calculate the radiological consequences of a liquid pathway - release-from a postulated core melt accident. The analysis should assume, unless otherwise justified, that there has been a penetration of the reactor basement by the molten core mass, and that a substantial portion of radioactively contaminated suppression pool water was released to the ground. Doses should be compared to those calculated in the Liquid Pathway Generic Study (NUREG-0440, 1978). Provide a summary of your analysis procedures and the values of parameters used (such as permeabilities, gradients, populations affected, water use). It is suggested that meetings with the staff of the Hydrologic Engineering Section be arranged so that we may share with you the body of information necessary to perform this analysis.
RESPONSE
As agreed during a meeting held with the NRC's Hydraulic s Engineering Section on November 17, 1983, a response to this question will be submitted in the second quarter of 1984. D () Supplement 5 Q&R E240.4-1 December 1983 O
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS
/n)
LJ QUESTION E451.18 (6.8, Regulatory Guide 1.23)
- 1. Explain what corrective action was taken to resolve the poor data recovery (less than 90%) for measures of atmospheric moisture prior to 1978. What maintenance and calibration procedures are currently being used to insure adequate data recovery?
- 2. Present the most recent available onsite measurements of atmospheric moisture (dew point) since 1978. The data summaries should chow diurnal and monthly averages and extremes, including the data recovery by month.
RESPONSE
Prior to June 1978, relative humidity was measured by Xeritron humidity sensors. Data recovery for these sensors when in service was over 90 percent, as shown in FSAR Table 2B-42A. In September 1975, the 30-ft instrument was taken out of service and the 200-ft instrument continued to operate at over 90 percent data recovery. At least one sensor remained in service until June 1978, when a chilled mirror system was installed. Subsequently, this instrumentation has been
, w, replaced by a new General Eastern chilled mirror system.
( The dew point system's recorders are checked once per day, s and the electronics are checked once per month. The dew point controller and sensor are calibrated twice a year, assuming normal operations. I If, however, the daily or monthly checks indicate a problem, additional calibration and/or maintenance are performed. The most receat available onsite summaries of atmospheric moisture content with over 90 percent data recovery are compiled from the 1974 through 1976 tower data. l l Monthly data recoveries for the onsite atmospheric moisture measurements from 1978 through October 1980 are listed in , Table 2B-52A. After October 1980, no valid moisture l measurements have been obtained. l t 1 1 Supplement 5 Q&R E451.18-1 December 1983 l (~) g
\-
l
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS [VT QUESTION E460.25 (ER 3.5) Provide the input parameter used for the fraction of feedwater processed through the condensate demineralizers to calculate expected annual gaseous and liquid effluent releases (BWR-GALE Code) from Nine Mile Point, Unit No. 2 (NMP-2). For a BWR with pumped forward feedwater heater drain design (such as NMP-2), the BWR-GALE Code executes the ratio of condensate demineralizer flow rate to steam flow rate of 0.18 for iodines and 0.01 for other nuclides. It appears that you have used a ratio value of 1.0 (full flow condensate demineralizers) in the BWR-GALE Code while your actual designed ratio value is approximately O.7 for which the BWR-GALE Code automatically executes 0.18 and 0.01 instead.
RESPONSE
See revised Section 3.5. The ratio of condensate demineralizer flow rate to steam flow rate of 0.7 is in 5 i agreement with the actual designed ratio value. O l I L}}